Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 94 references

Pavo: Stellar feedback in action in a low-mass dwarf galaxy

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read MeerKAT shows that the isolated dwarf Pavo holds the smallest neutral hydrogen reservoir measured in an isolated galaxy, and that its lopsided, disorganized gas is the aftermath of a star formation episode about 150 million years ago.

desk verdict First HI detection and radial velocity for Pavo; the record-low isolated HI mass is well measured but the headline claim hangs on an unpublished TRGB distance, and the feedback interpretation is plausible but not unique. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06424 v2 pith:UR2K5YBF submitted 2025-06-06 astro-ph.GA

Michael G. Jones , Martin P. Rey , David J. Sand , Kristine Spekkens , Burcin Mutlu-Pakdil , Elizabeth A. K. Adams , Paul Bennet , Denija Crnojevic
show 8 more authors
Amandine Doliva-Dolinsky Richard Donnerstein Catherine E. Fielder Julia Healy Laura C. Hunter Ananthan Karunakaran Deepthi S. Prabhu Dennis Zaritsky
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords DwarfirregulargalaxiesLowsurfacebrightnessGalaxyevolutionInterstellaratomicgasStellarfeedbackNeutralhydrogenMeerKATobservationsLow-mass
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports MeerKAT observations of Pavo, an extremely low-mass, star-forming dwarf galaxy at 2.16 Mpc, and measures its neutral hydrogen (HI) mass as $\log M_{\mathrm{HI}}/\mathrm{M}_\odot = 5.79 \pm 0.05$. That makes Pavo the lowest-mass HI reservoir currently known in an isolated galaxy with a well-measured distance, and it is strikingly gas-poor, with $\log M_{\mathrm{HI}}/M_* = -0.3$. Despite having no known neighbor within 700 kpc, Pavo's HI is lopsided, clumpy, offset from the stellar body by up to 320 pc, and shows no clear rotation. The authors interpret this as a snapshot of the bursty star-formation cycle in tiny galaxies: a star formation episode about 150 Myr ago, supernova feedback that disrupted and partially expelled the gas, and gas that now appears to be falling back toward the stellar body. If correct, Pavo provides a direct observational anchor for the boom-and-bust feedback cycle predicted in the lowest-mass star-forming dwarfs.

What carries the argument

The central object is Pavo's HI reservoir itself, measured with MeerKAT and compared against a time-ordered sequence of simulated low-mass dwarf galaxies. The comparison works by matching two observables: the projected offset between the HI and stellar centers (320 pc for the center of mass, 82 pc for the peak) and the absence of ordered rotation, against a simulation timeline that runs from a quiescent settled disk, through a supernova-driven outflow phase, to a re-accreting, still-lopsided phase. The mechanism is the bursty feedback cycle: in a galaxy this small the dynamical time, the disk-crossing time, and the lifetimes of core-collapse supernova progenitors are all comparable, roughly 20 Myr, so a single star formation episode can scramble the gas on short timescales, and the HI morphology becomes a phase indicator rather than an equilibrium tracer.

What would settle it

Measure Pavo's distance independently, for example with Cepheid variables or a second tip-of-the-red-giant-branch determination in different filters; because HI mass scales as the square of distance, a modestly larger distance would move Pavo up in HI mass and could remove its record-low status. Deeper, higher-resolution HI imaging could also falsify the feedback interpretation if it revealed a smooth, regularly rotating disk aligned with the stellar body rather than a lopsided post-burst remnant.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Pavo's neutral hydrogen reservoir has a mass of $\log M_{\mathrm{HI}}/\mathrm{M}_\odot = 5.79 \pm 0.05$, the lowest HI mass ever measured in an isolated galaxy with a reliable distance, and that this reservoir is strongly disturbed despite Pavo's isolation. The HI does not follow the stellar body: it is concentrated on the western side, has multiple peaks, and its center of mass lies 320 pc (in projection) from the stellar center, while its peak lies 82 pc away. There is no clear rotational signature. The paper argues that this morphology matches a specific phase of the bursty feedback cycle in low-mass dwarfs: roughly 150 Myr after a star formation episode, supernova-driven outflows have disrupted and ionized much of the gas, and the remaining HI is falling back toward the galaxy. It also shows that Pavo still lies on the HI size-mass relation, consistent with the expectation that only almost completely disrupted HI reservoirs deviate from that relation.

Load-bearing premise

The entire quantitative story rests on Pavo's adopted distance of 2.16 Mpc, which comes from a separate Hubble Space Telescope measurement that is not presented or verified in this paper; if that distance is wrong, the HI mass, the physical offsets, and the record-low claim all shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pavo becomes the benchmark for the gas-poor end of isolated dwarf galaxies: any model of low-mass galaxy formation must produce a post-burst phase with $\log M_{\mathrm{HI}}/M_* \approx -0.3$ and a disturbed, rotationless HI morphology.
  • Pavo's gas cannot be used to measure its dark matter halo, so future cusp-versus-core tests in this mass regime should target isolated dwarfs that have not formed stars for several hundred million years, where HI is most likely to be a settled disk.
  • The HI size-mass relation appears to extend unbroken to the lowest-mass star-forming galaxies, meaning the relation can serve as a check on such systems even when their gas is morphologically disturbed.
  • Leo P, Pavo, and Leo T can be read as three phases of the same feedback cycle: a galaxy currently forming stars, one roughly 150 Myr after the burst with disrupted infalling gas, and one whose gas has long since re-settled into a quiescent disk.
  • Wide-area HI surveys should be able to find more Pavo-like galaxies if the post-burst gas-poor phase is common, which would turn this single object into a population.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not make this statistical prediction, but if its feedback-cycle reading is right, the fraction of isolated low-mass dwarfs with lopsided, offset HI should correlate inversely with the age of the youngest stellar population; a survey pairing HI imaging with color-magnitude-diagram ages could test that directly.
  • If Pavo's gas is genuinely falling back, there may be ionized or extraplanar gas associated with the inflow that is invisible in HI; deep H-alpha or UV imaging could detect it and distinguish infall from residual outflow.
  • The record-low status of Pavo is fragile by construction: the same selection techniques that found it should find more objects in this mass regime in upcoming wide-field surveys, so the claim is best understood as defining a new regime rather than a permanent record.
  • By showing that HI morphology in this mass range is a short-lived phase, the paper implies that HI-selected samples are systematically biased against the quiescent disk phase most useful for dark-matter studies, so target selection should combine HI data with star-formation histories.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports MeerKAT 21-cm observations of Pavo, an extremely low-mass isolated dwarf galaxy at a claimed distance of 2.16 Mpc. The authors detect H i with an integrated flux of 0.56 ± 0.02 Jy km/s, giving log M_HI/M_sun = 5.79 ± 0.05, which they argue makes Pavo the lowest-mass H i reservoir known in an isolated galaxy with a robust distance. The H i is morphologically disturbed: lopsided, clumpy, with its center of mass offset by 320 pc and its peak offset by 82 pc from the stellar center, and with no clear rotation signature. The paper places Pavo on the H i size–mass relation and finds it consistent within the scatter once inclination is accounted for as an upper limit. The interpretation is that Pavo is observed roughly 100–150 Myr after a star formation episode, with stellar feedback having disrupted and partially ejected its gas, and that the gas is now falling back. The comparison with EDGE simulations (Rey et al.) is used to support a boom-and-bust cycle in which Leo P, Pavo, and Leo T represent different phases.

Significance. The MeerKAT flux measurement and the standard H i mass conversion are straightforward and appear reliable; if the adopted distance and stellar properties hold, Pavo is an important addition to the tiny sample of extremely low-mass star-forming dwarfs, and its very low H i mass and disturbed morphology would provide a useful test of feedback models in shallow potential wells. The comparison with EDGE simulations is a strength: the simulations predate the observation and are not fitted to it, so the qualitative match is meaningful rather than circular. However, the paper's headline claims rest on an unpublished companion paper, and the feedback interpretation is not uniquely determined by the present data. These issues are fixable with more cautious language and by making the distance-dependent quantities auditable.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2; Table 1; Section 3.2] The entire distance-dependent analysis—H i mass, H i diameter, the 82 pc and 320 pc offsets, and the 700 kpc isolation criterion—uses D = 2.16^{+0.08}_{-0.07} Mpc from Mutlu-Pakdil et al. (in prep.), but that paper is not available for inspection. Since M_HI ∝ D^2, a 15% distance error changes log M_HI by about 0.13 dex, which is comparable to the difference between Pavo and other claimed low-mass isolated systems. The paper labels the distance as 'robust' while citing an unpublished source; this is a verification gap, not an internal inconsistency, but it is load-bearing. The authors should either include the TRGB measurement, photometry, and fitting details in this paper or an appendix, or explicitly state that the record-low claim is provisional pending publication of the companion paper.
  2. [Section 4.1; Section 5] The conclusion that Pavo is 'stellar feedback in action' and specifically in a fallback phase is stronger than the data support. The paper itself states in Section 4.1 that 'it is difficult to conclusively tell whether the disturbances reflect outflows from the last SF episode or inflows starting to rebuild a smooth H i reservoir.' The timing argument depends on the youngest stars being ~150 Myr old, but the CMD constraint is described only as 'consistent with having formed as much as 150 Myr ago,' which is not a precise epoch and partly comes from the same unpublished work. The qualitative match to EDGE in Figure 5 is suggestive, but no quantitative comparison is made between Pavo's morphological/kinematic metrics and the full EDGE sample. A concrete test would be higher-resolution H i observations to search for an expanding or infalling velocity component; without such a test, the title and conclusion should be moderated to 'consistent with feedback' rather than claiming the process is established.
  3. [Section 3.3; Figure 4] The H i size–mass consistency argument is presented as 'extremely likely' on the basis of an upper limit on D_HI with an inclination correction that the authors themselves call an overestimate. While the direction of the correction is correct (the true face-on diameter is smaller than the observed value), the statement of probability is not quantified and the diameter is measured with a synthesized beam only ~3.5 times smaller than the source size. The authors should either provide a quantitative statement of how robust the consistency is (e.g., the fraction of the plausible D_HI-inclination parameter space that lies within the Wang et al. 3σ scatter) or soften the wording to 'consistent with the relation, given the uncertainties.'
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.1] There is an unresolved cross-reference 'Appendix ??' in the text; this should be fixed before publication.
  2. [Figure 5] The labels in the upper panels appear to have a missing subscript and unit: 'M = 4.7 × 10^5 M' should presumably read 'M_* = 4.7 × 10^5 M_sun'; please correct.
  3. [Abstract; Section 5] The abstract says 'lowest mass H i reservoir currently known in an isolated galaxy,' while Section 5 says 'lowest mass ever detected in any isolated galaxy beyond the LG.' These are different claims; please harmonize the wording and specify the comparison sample.
  4. [Section 4.1] The phrase 'consistent with having formed as much as 150 Myr ago' is ambiguous: it is unclear whether 150 Myr is an upper limit on the age of the youngest stars or a lower limit on the time since star formation. Please rephrase.
  5. [Section 3.4] When comparing the observed projected offsets to EDGE simulations, the text refers to 'figure 3' of Rey et al. (2022) but does not specify whether the simulated offsets were computed with the same moment definition (intensity-weighted center vs. peak) and the same projection. Please add a brief description of the comparison method.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the HI mass and morphology are observational measurements, and the EDGE simulation comparison is independent prior work not fitted to Pavo.

full rationale

The central quantitative claim, log M_HI/M_sun = 5.79 ± 0.05, is derived from the measured MeerKAT integrated flux (0.56 ± 0.02 Jy km/s) via the standard distance-dependent conversion; no equation in the paper redefines an input as an output. The adopted distance (2.16 Mpc) and stellar parameters are taken from Mutlu-Pakdil et al. (in prep.), which is an unverifiable-in-preprint input, but it is not constructed from the HI data, so this is a verification gap rather than circularity. The interpretation of the disturbed HI as post-starburst feedback relies on EDGE simulations (Rey et al. 2020, 2022, 2024) that include a co-author, but those simulations are published predictions with their own assumptions and were not fitted to Pavo's HI mass, offset, or morphology; comparing observed offsets (82 and 320 pc) to simulation ranges is an independent consistency check. The size-mass comparison uses the externally published Wang et al. (2016) relation. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness claim or ansatz is imported solely through self-citation. Thus no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measurement depends on externally measured distance and stellar properties (in prep.), plus standard HI conversion assumptions. The interpretation additionally assumes the EDGE simulations capture the feedback physics. No free parameters are fitted to make the HI mass claim, aside from an assumed intrinsic axial ratio used only for the size-mass upper-limit correction.

free parameters (1)
  • Intrinsic axial ratio for inclination correction = 0.2 (assumed edge-on ratio)
    Used to estimate Pavo's inclination (64 deg) from the stellar axial ratio of 0.48 in Section 3.3. The authors state this is likely an overestimate and use it only to set an upper limit on the HI diameter correction for the size-mass relation.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Distance to Pavo is 2.16 Mpc from HST TRGB measurement.
    Adopted in Section 2 and used for all absolute quantities (HI mass, linear sizes, offsets). Measurement is described in an unpublished companion paper (Mutlu-Pakdil et al. in prep.).
  • domain assumption Pavo has no known neighbor within 700 kpc, so it is isolated.
    Used in the Abstract and Section 4 to argue the disturbed HI morphology is internal (feedback) rather than interaction-driven. Depends on completeness of current distance and redshift surveys in the Local Volume.
  • domain assumption The HI line is optically thin, so the standard 21-cm flux-to-mass conversion applies.
    Implicitly assumed in Section 3.2 when converting integrated flux (0.56 Jy km/s) to HI mass. This is standard for HI observations but not verified for Pavo.
  • domain assumption Stellar mass, stellar center, and youngest-stellar-age (~150 Myr) come from HST imaging analysis by Mutlu-Pakdil et al. (in prep.).
    These values underpin the gas fraction ratio, the HI-stellar offset measurements, and the timing interpretation in Sections 3.4 and 4.1.
  • domain assumption The EDGE simulations (Rey et al. 2022, 2024) reproduce the relevant physics of low-mass dwarf feedback.
    Used in Section 4.1 to interpret Pavo's HI morphology as a post-feedback state. The simulation predictions are compared qualitatively, not fitted.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pavo: Stellar feedback in action in a low-mass dwarf galaxy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UR2K5YBF

@misc{pith2026250606424,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pavo: Stellar feedback in action in a low-mass dwarf galaxy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UR2K5YBF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06424}
}
abstract

MeerKAT observations of the recently discovered, extremely low mass galaxy, Pavo, have revealed a neutral gas (HI) reservoir that was undetected in archival HI single dish data. We measure Pavo's HI mass as $\log M_\mathrm{HI}/\mathrm{M_\odot} = 5.79 \pm 0.05$, making it the lowest mass HI reservoir currently known in an isolated galaxy (with a robust distance measurement). Despite Pavo's extreme isolation, with no known neighbor within over 700 kpc, its HI reservoir is highly disturbed. It does not show clear signs of rotation and its center of mass is offset from the stellar body center by 320 pc, while its peak is offset by 82 pc (both in projection). Despite this disturbed morphology, Pavo still appears to be consistent with the HI size--mass relation, although it is not possible to accurately determine a suitable inclination correction. Such disturbed, offset and disorganized HI reservoirs are predicted by simulations of low-mass, star-forming dwarfs in which supernova-driven outflows efficiently disrupt the interstellar medium after a star formation event. It is likely that we are witnessing Pavo in precisely this period, tens to a few hundred Myr after a star formation episode, when internal feedback has disrupted its gas reservoir.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.06424 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. MeerKAT H i moment zero contours overlaid on a DECaLS griz image of Pavo. The green star and dashed ellipse show the center and half-light extent of Pavo’s old stellar component (from HST imaging; Mutlu-Pakdil et al. in prep.), while the blue × and + show the peak of the H i distribution and its center of mass, respectively. Note that the bright point source near the center of Pavo is a foreground star with non-zero… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. H i channel maps of Pavo overlaid on a DECaLS griz image. The green dashed ellipse represents the stellar body (as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spectral profile of Pavo’s H i line emission. The dashed vertical line shows the flux-weighted line center (at 224 km s−1 ). The grey shading indicates the flux density uncertainty in each channel. The velocity axis follows the optical convention (i.e. v = cz) and is in the barycentric frame. 5 6 7 8 9 10 log MHI/M −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 log DHI /kpc Wang+2016 Leo T Pavo Leo P [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Pavo (blue star), Leo P (light blue hexagon), and Leo T (purple circle) on the H i size–mass relation (black solid line) of J. Wang et al. (2016), with the thin dashed black lines showing the 3σ scatter about the relation. The H i diameter values for Pavo and Leo P are…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time sequence of H i maps (top) and line-of-sight gas velocity fields (bottom) from an edge simulated low-mass dwarf similar to Pavo (at an inclination of 60◦ ). Before a SF event (left), the galaxy’s H i content is centrally concentrated, aligned with the stellar body…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Adams, E. A. K., & Oosterloo, T. A. 2018, Deep neutral hydrogen observations of Leo T with the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope, A&A, 612, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732017

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732017 2018

  2. [2]

    Adams, E. A. K., Adebahr, B., de Blok, W. J. G., et al. 2022, First release of Apertif imaging survey data, A&A, 667, A38, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244007

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244007 2022

  3. [3]

    I., et al

    Agertz, O., Pontzen, A., Read, J. I., et al. 2020, EDGE: the mass-metallicity relation as a critical test of galaxy formation physics, MNRAS, 491, 1656, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3053

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3053 2020

  4. [4]

    2019, The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1902.05569, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1902.05569 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Akeson, R., Armus, L., Bachelet, E., et al. 2019, The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1902.05569, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1902.05569 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 As...

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.05569 2019

  5. [5]

    Package, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

  6. [6]

    J., & Sullivan, D

    Banks, T., Dodd, R. J., & Sullivan, D. J. 1995, Moment analysis applied to LMC star clusters, MNRAS, 272, 821, doi: 10.1093/mnras/272.4.821

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/272.4.821 1995

  7. [7]

    G., Staveley-Smith, L., de Blok, W

    Barnes, D. G., Staveley-Smith, L., de Blok, W. J. G., et al. 2001, The HI Parkes All Sky Survey: southern observations, calibration and robust imaging, MNRAS, 322, 486, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04102.x

    arXiv 2001

  8. [8]

    N., Karachentsev, I

    Begum, A., Chengalur, J. N., Karachentsev, I. D., Kaisin, S. S., & Sharina, M. E. 2006, Gas distribution, kinematics and star formation in faint dwarf galaxies, MNRAS, 365, 1220, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09817.x

    arXiv 2006

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    N., Karachentsev, I

    Begum, A., Chengalur, J. N., Karachentsev, I. D., Sharina, M. E., & Kaisin, S. S. 2008, FIGGS: Faint Irregular Galaxies GMRT Survey - overview, observations and first results, MNRAS, 386, 1667, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13150.x

    2008

  2. [10]

    Z., Cannon, J

    Bernstein-Cooper, E. Z., Cannon, J. M., Elson, E. C., et al. 2014, ALF ALF A Discovery of the Nearby Gas-rich Dwarf Galaxy Leo P. V. Neutral Gas Dynamics and Kinematics, AJ, 148, 35, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/148/2/35

    2014 doi

  3. [11]

    2020, astropy/photutils: 1.0.0,, 1.0.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4044744

    Bradley, L., Sip˝ ocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2020, astropy/photutils: 1.0.0,, 1.0.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4044744

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    H., & Rhee, M

    Broeils, A. H., & Rhee, M. H. 1997, Short 21-cm WSRT observations of spiral and irregular galaxies. HI properties., A&A, 324, 877

    1997

  5. [13]

    S., & Boylan-Kolchin, M

    Bullock, J. S., & Boylan-Kolchin, M. 2017, Small-Scale Challenges to the ΛCDM Paradigm, ARA&A, 55, 343, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    M., Giovanelli, R., Haynes, M

    Cannon, J. M., Giovanelli, R., Haynes, M. P., et al. 2011, The Survey of H I in Extremely Low-mass Dwarfs (SHIELD), ApJL, 739, L22, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/739/1/L22

    2011 doi

  7. [15]

    M., Saintonge, A., et al

    Chamba, N., Marcum, P. M., Saintonge, A., et al. 2024, A Break in the Size–Stellar Mass Relation: Evidence for Quenching and Feedback in Dwarf Galaxies, ApJ, 974, 247, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7377

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    H., Kenney, J

    Chung, A., van Gorkom, J. H., Kenney, J. D. P., Crowl, H., & Vollmer, B. 2009, VLA Imaging of Virgo Spirals in Atomic Gas (VIV A). I. The Atlas and the H I Properties, AJ, 138, 1741, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/6/1741 de Blok, W. J. G. 2010, The Core-Cusp Problem, Advances in A...

    2009 doi

  9. [17]

    1986, The Origin of Dwarf Galaxies, Cold Dark Matter, and Biased Galaxy Formation, ApJ, 303, 39, doi: 10.1086/164050

    Dekel, A., & Silk, J. 1986, The Origin of Dwarf Galaxies, Cold Dark Matter, and Biased Galaxy Formation, ApJ, 303, 39, doi: 10.1086/164050

    1986 doi

  10. [18]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys, AJ, 157, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d Di Cintio, A., Brook, C. B., Macci` o, A. V., et al. 2014, The dependence of dark matter profiles on the stellar-to-halo mass ratio: a pred...

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    R., & Oman, K

    Downing, E. R., & Oman, K. A. 2023, The many reasons that the rotation curves of low-mass galaxies can fail as tracers of their matter distributions, MNRAS, 522, 3318, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad868 Euclid Collaboration, Mellier, Y., Abdurro’uf, et al. 2025, Euclid: I. Overview of...

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Giovanelli, R., & Haynes, M. P. 2015, Extragalactic HI surveys, A&A Rv, 24, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-015-0085-3 12

    2015 doi

  13. [21]

    P., Kent, B

    Giovanelli, R., Haynes, M. P., Kent, B. R., et al. 2005, The Arecibo Legacy Fast ALF A Survey. I. Science Goals, Survey Design, and Strategy, AJ, 130, 2598, doi: 10.1086/497431

    2005 doi

  14. [22]

    P., Adams, E

    Giovanelli, R., Haynes, M. P., Adams, E. A. K., et al. 2013, ALF ALF A Discovery of the Nearby Gas-rich Dwarf Galaxy Leo P. I. H I Observations, AJ, 146, 15, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/1/15

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    P., Giovanelli, R., Kent, B

    Haynes, M. P., Giovanelli, R., Kent, B. R., et al. 2018, The Arecibo Legacy Fast ALF A Survey: The ALF ALF A Extragalactic H I Source Catalog, ApJ, 861, 49, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac956

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    S., Salzer, J

    Hirschauer, A. S., Salzer, J. J., Skillman, E. D., et al. 2016, ALF ALF A Discovery of the Most Metal-poor Gas-rich Galaxy Known: AGC 198691, ApJ, 822, 108, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/822/2/108

    2016 doi

  17. [25]

    A., Ficut-Vicas, D., Ashley, T., et al

    Hunter, D. A., Ficut-Vicas, D., Ashley, T., et al. 2012, Little Things, AJ, 144, 134, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/134

    2012 doi

  18. [26]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics

    2007

  19. [27]

    Environment, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  20. [28]

    J., Belokurov, V., Evans, N

    Irwin, M. J., Belokurov, V., Evans, N. W., et al. 2007, Discovery of an Unusual Dwarf Galaxy in the Outskirts of the Milky Way, ApJL, 656, L13, doi: 10.1086/512183 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipa...

    2007 doi

  21. [29]

    G., Mutlu-Pakdil, B., Sand, D

    Jones, M. G., Mutlu-Pakdil, B., Sand, D. J., et al. 2023, Pavo: Discovery of a Star-forming Dwarf Galaxy Just Outside the Local Group, ApJL, 957, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0130

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    G., Sand, D

    Jones, M. G., Sand, D. J., Mutlu-Pakdil, B., et al. 2024, Corvus A: A Low-mass, Isolated Galaxy at 3.5 Mpc, ApJL, 971, L37, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad676e

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    A., & Mandel, E

    Joye, W. A., & Mandel, E. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 295, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XII, ed. H. E

    2003

  24. [32]

    Payne, R. I. Jedrzejewski, & R. N. Hook, 489 J´ ozsa, G. I. G., White, S. V., Thorat, K., et al. 2020, CARACal: Containerized Automated Radio Astronomy Calibration pipeline,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2006.014

    2020

  25. [33]

    Koribalski, B. S. 2008, in Astrophysics and Space Science

    2008

  26. [34]

    5, Galaxies in the Local Volume, ed

    Proceedings, Vol. 5, Galaxies in the Local Volume, ed. H. Jerjen & B. S. Koribalski, 41, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6933-8 7

    doi

  27. [35]

    S., Staveley-Smith, L., Westmeier, T., et al

    Koribalski, B. S., Staveley-Smith, L., Westmeier, T., et al. 2020, W ALLABY - an SKA Pathfinder HI survey, Ap&SS, 365, 118, doi: 10.1007/s10509-020-03831-4 Kovaˇ c, K., Oosterloo, T. A., & van der Hulst, J. M. 2009, A blind HI survey in the Canes Venatici region, MNRAS, 400, 7...

    2020

  28. [36]

    S., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al

    Lazar, A., Bullock, J. S., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al. 2020, A dark matter profile to model diverse feedback-induced core sizes of ΛCDM haloes, MNRAS, 497, 2393, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2101

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    C., Gil de Paz, A., Tremonti, C., et al

    Lee, J. C., Gil de Paz, A., Tremonti, C., et al. 2009, Comparison of H α and UV Star Formation Rates in the Local Volume: Systematic Discrepancies for Dwarf

    2009

  30. [38]

    Galaxies, ApJ, 706, 599, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/599

    doi

  31. [39]

    C., Gil de Paz, A., Kennicutt, Jr., R

    Lee, J. C., Gil de Paz, A., Kennicutt, Jr., R. C., et al. 2011, A GALEX Ultraviolet Imaging Survey of Galaxies in the Local Volume, ApJS, 192, 6, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/6

    2011 doi

  32. [40]

    2014, Dynamics of starbursting dwarf galaxies

    Lelli, F., Verheijen, M., & Fraternali, F. 2014, Dynamics of starbursting dwarf galaxies. III. A H I study of 18 nearby objects, A&A, 566, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322657

    2014 doi

  33. [41]

    A., Kilborn, V

    Lutz, K. A., Kilborn, V. A., Koribalski, B. S., et al. 2018, The H IX galaxy survey - II. H I kinematics of H I eXtreme galaxies, MNRAS, 476, 3744, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty387

    2018 doi

  34. [42]

    Martinsson, T. P. K., Verheijen, M. A. W., Bershady, M. A., et al. 2016, The DiskMass Survey. X. Radio synthesis imaging of spiral galaxies, A&A, 585, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527067

    2016 doi

  35. [43]

    M., & Kunth, D

    Mas-Hesse, J. M., & Kunth, D. 1999, A comprehensive study of intense star formation bursts in irregular and compact galaxies, A&A, 349, 765, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9812072

    1999 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    T., Teich, Y

    McNichols, A. T., Teich, Y. G., Nims, E., et al. 2016, SHIELD: Neutral Gas Kinematics and Dynamics, ApJ, 832, 89, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/89

    2016 doi

  37. [45]

    P., & Kelley, T

    Mitchell, N. P., & Kelley, T. 2018, Galactic outflows, star formation histories, and time-scales in starburst dwarf galaxies from STARBIRDS, MNRAS, 477, 3164, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty839

    2018 doi

  38. [46]

    McQuinn, K. B. W., Skillman, E. D., Cannon, J. M., et al. 2010, The Nature of Starbursts. II. The Duration of Starbursts in Dwarf Galaxies, ApJ, 724, 49, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/49 Pavo H i 13

    2010 doi

  39. [47]

    Imaging, ApJ, 802, 66, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/802/1/66

    doi

  40. [48]

    McQuinn, K. B. W., Skillman, E. D., Dolphin, A., et al. 2015b, Leo P: An Unquenched Very Low-mass Galaxy, ApJ, 812, 158, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/158

    doi

  41. [49]

    McQuinn, K. B. W., Newman, M. J. B., Skillman, E. D., et al. 2024, The Ancient Star Formation History of the Extremely Low-mass Galaxy Leo P: An Emerging Trend of a Post-reionization Pause in Star Formation, ApJ, 976, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8158

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    J., & Aivazis, M

    Millman, K. J., & Aivazis, M. 2011, Python for Scientists and Engineers, Computing in Science and Engineering, 13, 9, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.36

    2011 doi

  43. [51]

    I., et al

    Muni, C., Pontzen, A., Read, J. I., et al. 2025, EDGE: dark matter core creation depends on the timing of star formation, MNRAS, 536, 314, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2748

    2025 doi

  44. [52]

    J., Crnojevi´ c, D., et al

    Mutlu-Pakdil, B., Sand, D. J., Crnojevi´ c, D., et al. 2021, Resolved Dwarf Galaxy Searches within 5 Mpc with the Vera Rubin Observatory and Subaru Hyper

    2021

  45. [53]

    Suprime-Cam, ApJ, 918, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0db8

    doi

  46. [54]

    M., Sancisi, R., Swaters, R

    Noordermeer, E., van der Hulst, J. M., Sancisi, R., Swaters, R. A., & van Albada, T. S. 2005, The Westerbork HI survey of spiral and irregular galaxies. III. HI observations of early-type disk galaxies, A&A, 442, 137, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053172

    2005 doi

  47. [55]

    Oliphant, T. E. 2007, Python for Scientific Computing, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 10, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.58

    2007 doi

  48. [56]

    Orkney, M. D. A., Read, J. I., Rey, M. P., et al. 2021, EDGE: two routes to dark matter core formation in ultra-faint dwarfs, MNRAS, 504, 3509, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1066 pandas development team, T. 2020, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas,, latest Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    2014, Cold dark matter heats up, Nature, 506, 171, doi: 10.1038/nature12953

    Pontzen, A., & Governato, F. 2014, Cold dark matter heats up, Nature, 506, 171, doi: 10.1038/nature12953

    2014 doi

  50. [58]

    2013, pynbody: N-Body/SPH analysis for python,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1305.002

    Pontzen, A., Roˇ skar, R., Stinson, G., & Woods, R. 2013, pynbody: N-Body/SPH analysis for python,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1305.002

    2013

  51. [59]

    2018, TANGOS: The Agile Numerical Galaxy Organization System, ApJS, 237, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aac832

    Pontzen, A., & Tremmel, M. 2018, TANGOS: The Agile Numerical Galaxy Organization System, ApJS, 237, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aac832

    2018 doi

  52. [60]

    E., Zheng, Y., Price-Whelan, A

    Putman, M. E., Zheng, Y., Price-Whelan, A. M., et al. 2021, The Gas Content and Stripping of Local Group Dwarf Galaxies, ApJ, 913, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe391

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    I., Iorio, G., Agertz, O., & Fraternali, F

    Read, J. I., Iorio, G., Agertz, O., & Fraternali, F. 2016, Understanding the shape and diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves in ΛCDM, MNRAS, 462, 3628, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1876

    2016 doi

  54. [62]

    P., Pontzen, A., Agertz, O., et al

    Rey, M. P., Pontzen, A., Agertz, O., et al. 2020, EDGE: from quiescent to gas-rich to star-forming low-mass dwarf galaxies, MNRAS, 497, 1508, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1640

    2020 doi

  55. [63]

    P., Pontzen, A., Agertz, O., et al

    Rey, M. P., Pontzen, A., Agertz, O., et al. 2022, EDGE: What shapes the relationship between H I and stellar observables in faint dwarf galaxies?, MNRAS, 511, 5672, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac502

    2022 doi

  56. [64]

    P., Orkney, M

    Rey, M. P., Orkney, M. D. A., Read, J. I., et al. 2024, EDGE - Dark matter or astrophysics? Breaking dark matter heating degeneracies with H I rotation in faint dwarf galaxies, MNRAS, 529, 2379, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae718

    2024 doi

  57. [65]

    P., Taylor, E., Gray, E

    Rey, M. P., Taylor, E., Gray, E. I., et al. 2025, EDGE: The emergence of dwarf galaxy scaling relations from cosmological radiation-hydrodynamics simulations, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.03813, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.03813

    2025 doi arXiv

  58. [66]

    L., Salzer, J

    Rhode, K. L., Salzer, J. J., Haurberg, N. C., et al. 2013, ALF ALF A Discovery of the Nearby Gas-rich Dwarf Galaxy Leo P. II. Optical Imaging Observations, AJ, 145, 149, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/145/6/149

    2013 doi

  59. [67]

    2020, reproject: Python-based astronomical image reprojection, http://ascl.net/2011.023

    Robitaille, T., Deil, C., & Ginsburg, A. 2020, reproject: Python-based astronomical image reprojection, http://ascl.net/2011.023

    2020

  60. [68]

    2013, RAMSES-RT: radiation hydrodynamics in the cosmological context, MNRAS, 436, 2188, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1722

    Teyssier, R. 2013, RAMSES-RT: radiation hydrodynamics in the cosmological context, MNRAS, 436, 2188, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1722

    2013 doi

  61. [69]

    V., Wetzel, A., & Fattahi, A

    Sales, L. V., Wetzel, A., & Fattahi, A. 2022, Baryonic solutions and challenges for cosmological models of dwarf galaxies, Nature Astronomy, 6, 897, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01689-w

    2022 doi

  62. [70]

    J., Spekkens, K., Crnojevi´ c, D., et al

    Sand, D. J., Spekkens, K., Crnojevi´ c, D., et al. 2015, Antlia B: A Faint Dwarf Galaxy Member of the NGC 3109

    2015

  63. [71]

    Association, ApJL, 812, L13, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/812/1/L13

    doi

  64. [72]

    S., Hopkins, P

    Sands, I. S., Hopkins, P. F., Shen, X., et al. 2024, Confronting the Diversity Problem: The Limits of Galaxy Rotation Curves as a tool to Understand Dark Matter Profiles, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.16247, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.16247 14

    2024 doi arXiv

  65. [73]

    2012, The ATLAS3D project - XIII

    Serra, P., Oosterloo, T., Morganti, R., et al. 2012, The ATLAS3D project - XIII. Mass and morphology of H I in early-type galaxies as a function of environment, MNRAS, 422, 1835, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20219.x

    2012

  66. [74]

    2014, The ATLAS3D project - XXVI

    Serra, P., Oser, L., Krajnovi´ c, D., et al. 2014, The ATLAS3D project - XXVI. H I discs in real and simulated fast and slow rotators, MNRAS, 444, 3388, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2496

    2014 doi

  67. [75]

    2015, SOFIA: a flexible source finder for 3D spectral line data, MNRAS, 448, 1922, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv079

    Serra, P., Westmeier, T., Giese, N., et al. 2015, SOFIA: a flexible source finder for 3D spectral line data, MNRAS, 448, 1922, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv079

    2015 doi

  68. [76]

    D., Salzer, J

    Skillman, E. D., Salzer, J. J., Berg, D. A., et al. 2013, ALF ALF A Discovery of the nearby Gas-rich Dwarf Galaxy Leo P. III. An Extremely Metal Deficient Galaxy, AJ, 146, 3, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/1/3

    2013 doi

  69. [77]

    Spaans, M., & Norman, C. A. 1997, Cosmological Evolution of Dwarf Galaxies: The Influence of Star Formation and the Multiphase Interstellar Medium, ApJ, 483, 87, doi: 10.1086/304231

    1997 doi

  70. [78]

    Aguirre, J. E. 2014, The Dearth of Neutral Hydrogen in Galactic Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies, ApJL, 795, L5, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/795/1/L5

    2014 doi

  71. [79]

    Stevens, A. R. H., Diemer, B., Lagos, C. d. P., et al. 2019, Origin of the galaxy H I size-mass relation, MNRAS, 490, 96, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2513

    2019 doi

  72. [80]

    S., Dalcanton, J

    Stinson, G. S., Dalcanton, J. J., Quinn, T., Kaufmann, T., & Wadsley, J. 2007, Breathing in Low-Mass Galaxies: A Study of Episodic Star Formation, ApJ, 667, 170, doi: 10.1086/520504

    2007 doi

  73. [81]

    Stopyra, S., Pontzen, A., Peiris, H., Roth, N., & Rey, M. P. 2021, GenetIC—A New Initial Conditions Generator to Support Genetically Modified Zoom Simulations, ApJS, 252, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abcd94

    2021 doi

  74. [82]

    2002, The Westerbork HI survey of spiral and irregular galaxies

    Sancisi, R. 2002, The Westerbork HI survey of spiral and irregular galaxies. I. HI imaging of late-type dwarf galaxies, A&A, 390, 829, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011755

    2002 doi

  75. [83]

    2002, Cosmological hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement

    Teyssier, R. 2002, Cosmological hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement. A new high resolution code called RAMSES, A&A, 385, 337, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011817

    2002 doi

  76. [84]

    Teyssier, R., Pontzen, A., Dubois, Y., & Read, J. I. 2013, Cusp-core transformations in dwarf galaxies: observational predictions, MNRAS, 429, 3068, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts563 van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical

    2013 doi

  77. [85]

    Computation, Computing in Science and Engineering, 13, 22, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37

    2011 doi

  78. [86]

    Verheijen, M. A. W., & Sancisi, R. 2001, The Ursa Major cluster of galaxies. IV. HI synthesis observations, A&A, 370, 765, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010090

    2001 doi

  79. [87]

    Walter, F., Brinks, E., de Blok, W. J. G., et al. 2008, THINGS: The H I Nearby Galaxy Survey, AJ, 136, 2563, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2563

    2008 doi

  80. [88]

    S., Serra, P., et al

    Wang, J., Koribalski, B. S., Serra, P., et al. 2016, New lessons from the H I size-mass relation of galaxies, MNRAS, 460, 2143, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1099

    2016 doi

  81. [89]

    Wang, J., Kauffmann, G., J´ ozsa, G. I. G., et al. 2013, The Bluedisks project, a study of unusually H I-rich galaxies - I. H I sizes and morphology, MNRAS, 433, 270, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt722

    2013 doi

  82. [90]

    2024, FEASTS Combined with Interferometry

    Wang, J., Lin, X., Staveley-Smith, L., et al. 2024, FEASTS Combined with Interferometry. II. Significantly Changed H I Surface Densities and Even More Inefficient Star Formation in Galaxy Outer Disks, ApJ, 973, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6763

    2024 doi

  83. [91]

    R., Zucker, D

    Weisz, D. R., Zucker, D. B., Dolphin, A. E., et al. 2012, The Star Formation History of Leo T from Hubble Space Telescope Imaging, ApJ, 748, 88, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/748/2/88

    2012 doi

  84. [92]

    2021a, SOFIA 2 - an automated, parallel H I source finding pipeline for the W ALLABY survey, MNRAS, 506, 3962, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1881

    Westmeier, T., Kitaeff, S., Pallot, D., et al. 2021a, SOFIA 2 - an automated, parallel H I source finding pipeline for the W ALLABY survey, MNRAS, 506, 3962, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1881

    doi

  85. [93]

    2025, F AST Discovery of a Gas-rich and Ultrafaint Dwarf Galaxy: KK153, ApJL, 982, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adbe7e

    Xu, J.-L., Zhu, M., Yu, N.-P., et al. 2025, F AST Discovery of a Gas-rich and Ultrafaint Dwarf Galaxy: KK153, ApJL, 982, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adbe7e

    2025 doi

  86. [94]

    2024, The F AST all sky H I survey (F ASHI): The first release of catalog, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 67, 219511, doi: 10.1007/s11433-023-2219-7

    Zhang, C.-P., Zhu, M., Jiang, P., et al. 2024, The F AST all sky H I survey (F ASHI): The first release of catalog, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 67, 219511, doi: 10.1007/s11433-023-2219-7

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.