pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2506.06497 · v3 · submitted 2025-06-06 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.IM

Recognition: unknown

New Methods for Offline GstLAL Analyses

Aaron Viets, Alexander Pace, Alvin K. Y. Li, Amanda Baylor, Anarya Ray, Becca Ewing, Bryce Cousins, Chad Hanna, Cody Messick, Cort Posnansky, Debnandini Mukherjee, Divya Singh, Duncan Meacher, Heather Fong, James Kennington, Jolien D. E. Creighton, Kipp Cannon, Koh Ueno, Leo Tsukada, Leslie Wade, Madeline Wade, Noah Zhang, Patrick Godwin, Prathamesh Joshi, Pratyusava Baral, Rachael Huxford, Reiko Harada, Richard N. George, Ron Tapia, Ryan Magee, Sarah Caudill, Shio Sakon, Shomik Adhicary, Soichiro Kuwahara, Soichiro Morisaki, Stefano Schmidt, Surabhi Sachdev, Urja Shah, Wanting Niu, Yun-Jing Huang, Zach Yarbrough

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.IM
keywords methodsgstlalofflineresultsanalysissensitivitygravitationalwave
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this work, we present new methods implemented in the GstLAL offline gravitational wave search. These include a technique to reuse the matched filtering data products from a GstLAL online analysis, which hugely reduces the time and computational resources required to obtain offline results; a technique to combine these results with a separate search for heavier black hole mergers, enabling detections from a larger set of gravitational wave sources; changes to the likelihood ratio which increases the sensitivity of the analysis; and two separate changes to the background estimation, allowing more precise significance estimation of gravitational wave candidates. Some of these methods increase the sensitivity of the analysis, whereas others correct previous mis-estimations of sensitivity by eliminating false positives. These methods have been adopted for GstLAL's offline results during the fourth observing run of LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA (O4). To test these new methods, we perform an offline analysis over one chunk of O3 data, lasting from May 12 19:36:42 UTC 2019 to May 21 14:45:08 UTC 2019, and compare it with previous GstLAL results over the same period of time. We show that cumulatively these methods afford around a 50% - 100% increase in sensitivity in the highest mass space, while simultaneously increasing the reliability of results, and making them more reusable and computationally cheaper.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The first informative astrophysical calibration of gravitational-wave detectors is reported using GW240925 and GW250207.

  2. GW250114: testing Hawking's area law and the Kerr nature of black holes

    gr-qc 2025-09 accept novelty 5.0

    GW250114 data confirm the remnant black hole ringdown frequencies lie within 30% of Kerr predictions and that the final horizon area is larger than the sum of the progenitors' areas to high credibility.

  3. Searches for Binary Mergers with Sub-solar Mass Components in Data from the First Part of LIGO--Virgo--KAGRA's Fourth Observing Run

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 accept novelty 4.0

    No sub-solar mass binary merger candidates found in LIGO data from May 2023 to January 2024, yielding merger rate upper limits of 110-10000 Gpc^{-3}yr^{-1} and constraints on primordial black hole dark matter fractions.