Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 285 references

Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Agentic AI safety needs value alignment at three nested levels

desk verdict A useful, well-organized survey of value alignment in LLM-based multi-agent systems; the macro/meso/micro taxonomy is plausible but the generalizability-to-level mapping in §3.2 is asserted, not established, and needs revision before I'd rely on it. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.09656 v2 pith:5M7UJICR submitted 2025-06-11 cs.AI

Wei Zeng , Hengshu Zhu , Chuan Qin , Han Wu , Yihang Cheng , Sirui Zhang , Xiaowei Jin , Yinuo Shen
show 3 more authors
Zhenxing Wang Feimin Zhong Hui Xiong
This is my paper
classification cs.AI
keywords valuealignmentagenticAImulti-agentsystemsLLM-basedagentsmulti-levelframeworkgovernanceevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey argues that value alignment for agentic AI systems cannot be a single universal standard. It proposes a three-level value hierarchy—macro, meso, and micro—and claims that the number of levels a system must satisfy is set by how general its application scenario is. High-generalizability agents, such as general tool users, need only macro-level universal ethics; specialized systems, such as hospital or finance agents, must also satisfy national, industry, and organizational norms. If this correspondence holds, it gives developers and regulators a structured way to decide which values to encode, and it reframes alignment as a governance problem rather than a purely technical one.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the three-level value framework itself, built top-down from macro to meso to micro, coupled to a general-to-specific continuum of application scenarios. The framework is what lets the survey organize over 200 publications: value principles are classified by tier, applications are classified by generalizability, and alignment methods and benchmarks are assessed by which tier they address. The correspondence claim—lower generalizability requires finer-grained value norms—is the mechanism that turns the taxonomy into a design rule.

What would settle it

One concrete test: take a general-purpose agent aligned only on macro-level principles and deploy it in a hospital setting without medical-specific meso or micro norms; if it produces unsafe or privacy-violating recommendations, the claimed correspondence between high generalizability and macro-only alignment would fail. A benchmark study across several such domains would settle the matter.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that value alignment in agentic AI systems should be organized by a nested hierarchy of value principles. At the macro level sit universal ethical values—compliance, safety, harmlessness, fairness—that all systems should obey. At the meso level sit national policies, cultural dimensions, and industry-specific norms. At the micro level sit the values of a particular organization or task context, such as fair hiring or patient-data privacy. The paper asserts that the degree of generalizability of an agent's application determines how many levels apply: broadly applicable systems need only macro values, while narrowly scoped systems must satisfy macro, meso, and micro norms simultaneously. It then maps alignment methods and evaluation datasets onto these tiers and identifies value coordination across multiple agents as the key open problem.

Load-bearing premise

The framework's central premise is that the granularity of values an agent must follow is set by how general its application is, so a broadly usable agent can ignore national, industry, and organizational norms as long as it follows universal ethics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Developers of general-purpose agent platforms can focus alignment effort on macro-level universal values, while domain-specific deployments must layer national, industry, and organizational norms on top.
  • Evaluation benchmarks should be organized and interpreted by value tier, since a dataset that tests macro-level ethics says little about micro-level compliance in a particular organization.
  • Multi-agent value alignment has to be treated as a coordination design problem—interaction mechanisms, organizational structure, and communication protocols—not just a per-model training objective.
  • Governance bodies and enterprises need a multi-level evaluation system and shared open datasets before value alignment can be certified across macro, meso, and micro levels.
  • Aligning values within a single agent is insufficient; value conflicts and goal misalignment in multi-agent systems require game-theoretic interaction design and organizational models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension of the paper's correspondence: a general-purpose agent deployed unmodified in a hospital or court should show measurable misalignment on micro-level norms, which would confirm that generalizability alone is insufficient unless meso and micro values are added.
  • The framework could be operationalized as a compliance checklist: define the application's generalizability, enumerate the value tiers that apply, and select alignment methods and benchmarks accordingly; this goes beyond the paper's survey and is a natural next step.
  • If the correspondence is treated as a strict rule, it predicts that a high-generalizability agent in a specialized context will be value-aligned purely through macro ethics; the paper presents this as a conceptual mapping without empirical validation, so that prediction is what future work should test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper is a survey of value alignment for LLM-based agentic AI systems, organized around a proposed "multi-level value" framework. The authors classify human values into macro, meso, and micro levels (Section 2.4), categorize agent application scenarios by degree of generalizability (Section 3.1), and assert a correspondence between generalizability and the granularity of value norms that must be satisfied (Section 3.2). The survey reviews value-alignment methods and evaluation datasets, maps them to the three levels, discusses value coordination in multi-agent systems, and proposes future research directions including game-theoretic interaction design, organizational structures, communication protocols, and multi-level evaluation frameworks.

Significance. If the proposed framework were validated, it would provide a useful organizing structure for a fragmented literature, connecting value alignment to application governance in a way that prior surveys have not. The paper's strengths include its broad coverage (over 200 references), the systematic dataset table in Appendix B, and the thoughtful discussion of multi-agent coordination mechanisms and communication protocols in Sections 5.2 and 5.3. The central contribution, however, is a conceptual taxonomy with a load-bearing but unvalidated mapping between generalizability and value levels. The survey is valuable as a structured perspective, but the framework's predictive and governance claims require either empirical support or an explicit re-framing as a hypothesis for future testing.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2] The paper's central organizing principle, that required value granularity is determined by application generalizability, is underdetermined as stated. Generalizability is defined in Section 3.1 as the extent to which a system can be applied across diverse scenarios, so a high-generalizability system deployed in a single specific context (for example, a general dialogue agent deployed in a hospital) retains high generalizability as a property. Under the Section 3.2 mapping, that deployment would require only macro-level values, yet the same section's caveat that "when agentic AI systems are applied in diverse contexts, their value alignment objectives must be adapted accordingly" would require meso-level medical regulations and micro-level organizational norms. The paper gives no rule for resolving this conflict, so the mapping is not a function of generalizability alone and cannot serve as the framework's central organizing principle without additional assumptions or empirical validation.
  2. [Section 4.1.3, Execution and Tool Use] The claim that execution and tool use "serves as a key interface for ensuring alignment with human values" is supported by reference [150], which is the manuscript's own arXiv record (arXiv:2506.09656). A self-citation of the same survey cannot provide independent support for a substantive claim. Replace this citation with independent work or remove the claim.
  3. [Section 2.4 and Figure 2] The macro/meso/micro taxonomy is asserted rather than derived, and its boundary conditions are unclear. For example, privacy appears as a macro-level principle in Figure 2, as part of national and industry-level values in the meso-level discussion, and again in micro-level recruitment examples, with no stated criterion for assigning a value to a level or for deciding when a context requires a given level. If the framework is to support the governance rule proposed in Section 3.2, the authors should provide assignment rules or explicitly present the taxonomy as a working hypothesis rather than a settled classification.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figures 1 and 2] There are typos in the figures: "Marco" should be "Macro" in Figures 1 and 3, and "Turst" should be "Trust" in Figure 2.
  2. [Appendix A] The methodology in Appendix A states that only papers from top-tier journals and conferences were included, but Table A-I lists several arXiv preprints (for example, references [209] and [212]). Please clarify whether preprints were included despite the stated criteria, or adjust the methodology description.
  3. [Section 4.2.2] The sentence "Evaluation methods for value alignment largely depend on the format of assessment questions" appears twice in consecutive paragraphs; one occurrence should be removed.
  4. [Section 2.4.3] The surname "Rünb-Kettler" appears to be a typo for "Rąb-Kettler"; please correct it and check the associated reference.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor self-citation in §4.1.3: the claim that execution and tool use is a key value-alignment interface is supported by reference [150], which is this same survey; the central macro/meso/micro framework is otherwise self-contained.

  1. other [Section 4.1.3, 'Execution and Tool Use' (reference [150])]
    "In LLM-based agent systems, it is one of the core mechanisms enabling autonomy and interaction with the environment. It also serves as a key interface for ensuring alignment with human values [150]."

    Reference [150] is 'W. Zeng et al., Application-driven value alignment in agentic AI systems: Survey and perspectives, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09656, 2025', which is the present paper itself (same arXiv identifier and survey title). The sentence uses this self-citation as the support for the claim that execution and tool use is a key value-alignment interface, and the same reference is later cited for the claim that value judgments are hard to unify across cultures. This is a self-referential support loop rather than independent evidence. It is not load-bearing for the paper's central organizing framework: the macro/meso/micro value taxonomy in Section 2.4 is built on external sources (e.g., Moral Foundations Theory, Schwartz's value theory, and the AI ethics principles of Jobin et al.

full rationale

This is a survey with no formal derivation chain, fitted parameters, or benchmark predictions, so most circularity patterns (self-definitional equations, fitted-input predictions, imported uniqueness theorems, ansatz-by-citation) do not apply. The central claim—that value alignment decomposes into macro, meso, and micro levels mirroring the generalizability of agentic AI applications—is introduced by definition and by citation to external ethical frameworks; it is an organizational taxonomy rather than a derived result. The absence of empirical validation for the generalizability-to-value-level mapping is a correctness and robustness concern, not a circularity. The one verifiable circular step is reference [150], which is the paper citing itself (same arXiv ID 2506.09656) to support the peripheral claim in Section 4.1.3 that execution and tool use is a key value-alignment interface and that value judgments are culturally hard to unify. Because this claim is not load-bearing for the macro/meso/micro framework and is supported by surrounding external literature on agent architectures, the appropriate score is 2: one minor self-citation that is not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a survey, so there are no fitted numerical parameters and no new physical or conceptual entities. The framework relies on several modeling assumptions about value levels and their mapping to applications, which are explicit in the text but not empirically validated.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The top-down approach to value alignment is appropriate.
    Section 2.3: 'This paper adopts the top-down approach to examine the ethical principles that agents should follow across different levels.' This excludes bottom-up approaches as the primary lens.
  • domain assumption Values are multi-level (macro, meso, micro) and exclude individual-level values.
    Section 2.2: 'This paper does not address individual-level values. These value layers are nested, with higher-level values constraining and guiding lower-level ones.' This is a modeling choice.
  • domain assumption Application generalizability maps to value granularity.
    Section 3.2: 'The degree of generalizability of agentic AI systems corresponds to the multi-level of values.' This correspondence is asserted without empirical validation.
  • domain assumption The literature selection (881 to 144 papers) by an 11-expert panel is representative.
    Appendix A describes the screening but does not provide inter-rater agreement or the full list of excluded papers, so representativeness is assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5M7UJICR

@misc{pith2026250609656,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5M7UJICR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.09656}
}
read the original abstract

The ongoing evolution of AI paradigms has propelled AI research into the agentic AI stage. Consequently, the focus of research has shifted from single agents and simple applications towards multi-agent autonomous decision-making and task collaboration in complex environments. As Large Language Models (LLMs) advance, their applications become more diverse and complex, leading to increasing situational and systemic risks. This has brought significant attention to value alignment for agentic AI systems, which aims to ensure that an agent's goals, preferences, and behaviors align with human values and societal norms. Addressing socio-governance demands through a Multi-level Value framework, this study comprehensively reviews value alignment in LLM-based multi-agent systems as the representative archetype of agentic AI systems. Our survey systematically examines three interconnected dimensions: First, value principles are structured via a top-down hierarchy across macro, meso, and micro levels. Second, application scenarios are categorized along a general-to-specific continuum explicitly mirroring these value tiers. Third, value alignment methods and evaluation are mapped to this tiered framework through systematic examination of benchmarking datasets and relevant methodologies. Additionally, we delve into value coordination among multiple agents within agentic AI systems. Finally, we propose several potential research directions in this field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.09656 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An Overview of Our Survey more, researchers are increasingly exploring the coordination of multi-agent systems to achieve collective intelligence. AI agents are increasingly evolving towards autonomous systems, forming a new paradigm: Agentic AI. Characterized by multi-agent collaboration, dynamic task decomposition, persistent memory, and autonomous decision-making ca￾pabilities, agentic AI is becoming a central fo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Multi-Level Value Alignment Principles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An Overview of Classification of Agentic AI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An Overview of Methods for Value Alignment in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A Conceptual Framework for Future Directions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

285 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [150]

    Application-driven value alignment in agentic ai systems: Survey and perspectives,

    W. Zenget al., “Application-driven value alignment in agentic ai systems: Survey and perspectives,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09656, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    The rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey,

    Z. Xiet al., “The rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey,”Sci. China Inf. Sci., vol. 68, no. 2, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-024-4222-0

    doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4222-0 2025

  3. [2]

    A comprehensive overview of large language models,

    H. Naveedet al., “A comprehensive overview of large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.06435, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  4. [3]

    Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early ex- periments with gpt-4. arxiv 2023,

    S. Bubecket al., “Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early ex- periments with gpt-4. arxiv 2023,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712, vol. 10, 2024

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    A survey on alignment for large language model agents,

    D. Zhou, J. Zhang, T. Feng, and Y. Sun, “A survey on alignment for large language model agents,”UIUC Spring 2025 CS598 LLM Agent Workshop, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Multi-agent collaboration mechanisms: A survey of llms,

    K.-T. Tran, D. Dao, M.-D. Nguyen, Q.-V . Pham, B. O’Sullivan, and H. D. Nguyen, “Multi-agent collaboration mechanisms: A survey of llms,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.06322, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Large language model based multi-agents: A survey of progress and challenges,

    T. Guoet al., “Large language model based multi-agents: A survey of progress and challenges,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01680, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    A survey on large language model based autonomous agents,

    L. Wanget al., “A survey on large language model based autonomous agents,”Frontiers Comput. Sci., vol. 18, no. 6, p. 186345, 2024

    2024

Show all 285 references
  1. [9]

    AI alignment: A comprehensive survey,

    J. Jiet al., “AI alignment: A comprehensive survey,” CoRR, vol. abs/2310.19852, 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.19852

    2023 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    From instructions to intrinsic human values–a survey of alignment goals for big models,

    J. Yao, X. Yi, X. Wang, J. Wang, and X. Xie, “From instructions to intrinsic human values–a survey of alignment goals for big models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12014, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Large language model alignment: A survey,

    T. Shenet al., “Large language model alignment: A survey,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15025, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Unpacking the ethical value alignment in big models,

    X. Yi and X. Xie, “Unpacking the ethical value alignment in big models,”Journal of Computer Research and Development, vol. 60, no. 09, pp. 1926–1945, 2023

    1926

  5. [13]

    Trustworthy llms: a survey and guideline for evaluating large language models’ alignment,

    Y. Liuet al., “Trustworthy llms: a survey and guideline for evaluating large language models’ alignment,”CoRR, vol. abs/2308.05374, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.2308.05374

    2023 doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    Towards bidirectional human-ai alignment: A systematic review for clarifications, framework, and future directions,

    H. Shenet al., “Towards bidirectional human-ai alignment: A systematic review for clarifications, framework, and future directions,”CoRR, vol. abs/2406.09264, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.09264

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Value alignment in ai large models: Curren status, key issues, and normative strategies,

    X. Zeng, “Value alignment in ai large models: Curren status, key issues, and normative strategies,”E-Government, no. 02, pp. 34–44, 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    Trustagent: Towards safe and trustworthy llm- based agents through agent constitution,

    W. Huaet al., “Trustagent: Towards safe and trustworthy llm- based agents through agent constitution,” inTrustworthy Multi- modal Foundation Models and AI Agents (TiFA), 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Large language model-based agents for software engineering: A survey,

    J. Liuet al., “Large language model-based agents for software engineering: A survey,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02977, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    To- wards friendly ai: A comprehensive review and new perspectives on human-ai alignment,

    Q. Sun, Y. Li, E. Alturki, S. M. K. Murthy, and B. W. Schuller, “To- wards friendly ai: A comprehensive review and new perspectives on human-ai alignment,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15114, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Dunleavy,Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government

    P . Dunleavy,Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford University Press, 2006

    2006

  12. [21]

    Artificial intelligence, values, and alignment,

    I. Gabriel, “Artificial intelligence, values, and alignment,”Minds and machines, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 411–437, 2020

    2020

  13. [22]

    A survey on large language model based autonomous agents,

    L. Wanget al., “A survey on large language model based autonomous agents,”Frontiers of Computer Science, vol. 18, no. 6, p. 186345, 2024

    2024

  14. [23]

    Large language model based multi-agents: A survey of progress and challenges,

    T. Guoet al., “Large language model based multi-agents: A survey of progress and challenges,” inProceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2024, Jeju, South Korea, August 3-9, 2024. ijcai.org, 2024, pp. 8048–8057. [Online]....

    2024

  15. [24]

    A survey on llm-based multi-agent system: Recent advances and new frontiers in application,

    S. Chen, Y. Liu, W. Han, W. Zhang, and T. Liu, “A survey on llm-based multi-agent system: Recent advances and new frontiers in application,”Preprint at https://doi. org/10.48550/arXiv, vol. 2412, 2025

    2025 doi

  16. [25]

    A survey on context-aware multi-agent systems: techniques, challenges and future directions,

    H. Du, S. Thudumu, R. Vasa, and K. Mouzakis, “A survey on context-aware multi-agent systems: techniques, challenges and future directions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01968, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  17. [26]

    Casevo: A cognitive agents and social evolution simulator,

    Z. Jianget al., “Casevo: A cognitive agents and social evolution simulator,”CoRR, vol. abs/2412.19498, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.19498

    2024 doi arXiv

  18. [27]

    A theory of value,

    W. R. Catton Jr, “A theory of value,”American Sociological Review, pp. 310–317, 1959

    1959

  19. [28]

    Personal values in human life,

    L. Sagiv, S. Roccas, J. Cieciuch, and S. H. Schwartz, “Personal values in human life,”Nature human behaviour, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 630–639, 2017

    2017

  20. [29]

    The value concept in sociology,

    F. Adler, “The value concept in sociology,”American journal of sociology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 272–279, 1956

    1956

  21. [30]

    Social change with respect to culture and original,

    W. F. Ogburn, “Social change with respect to culture and original,” Nature, pp. 240–5, 1922

    1922

  22. [31]

    S. J. Russell and P . Norvig,Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. pearson, 2016

    2016

  23. [32]

    From instructions to intrinsic human values - A survey of alignment goals for big models,

    J. Yao, X. Yi, X. Wang, J. Wang, and X. Xie, “From instructions to intrinsic human values - A survey of alignment goals for big models,”CoRR, vol. abs/2308.12014, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.12014

    2023 doi arXiv

  24. [33]

    Russell,Human compatible: AI and the problem of control

    S. Russell,Human compatible: AI and the problem of control. Penguin Uk, 2019

    2019

  25. [34]

    The alignment problem: Machine learning and human values,

    B. Christian, “The alignment problem: Machine learning and human values,”Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 274–276, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://jaapl.org/content/52/2/274

    2024

  26. [35]

    Moral mimicry: Large language models produce moral rationalizations tailored to political identity,

    G. Simmons, “Moral mimicry: Large language models produce moral rationalizations tailored to political identity,” inProceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop, ACL 2023, Toronto, Canada, July 9-14, 2023, V...

    2023 doi

  27. [36]

    The political biases of chatgpt,

    D. Rozado, “The political biases of chatgpt,”Social Sciences, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 148, 2023

    2023

  28. [37]

    Toxicity in chatgpt: Analyzing persona- assigned language models,

    A. Deshpande, V . Murahari, T. Rajpurohit, A. Kalyan, and K. Narasimhan, “Toxicity in chatgpt: Analyzing persona- assigned language models,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, Singapore, December 6-10, 2023, H. Bouamor, J. Pino, and K. Bal...

    2023 doi

  29. [38]

    The global landscape of ai ethics guidelines,

    A. Jobin, M. Ienca, and E. Vayena, “The global landscape of ai ethics guidelines,”Nature machine intelligence, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 389–399, 2019

    2019

  30. [39]

    A unified framework of five principles for ai in society,

    L. Floridi and J. Cowls, “A unified framework of five principles for ai in society,”Machine learning and the city: Applications in architecture and urban design, pp. 535–545, 2022

    2022

  31. [40]

    Ethics of ai: A systematic literature review of principles and challenges,

    A. A. Khanet al., “Ethics of ai: A systematic literature review of principles and challenges,” inProceedings of the 26th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering, 2022, pp. 383–392

    2022

  32. [41]

    Towards realistic evaluation of cultural value alignment in large language models: Diversity enhancement for survey response simulation,

    H. Liuet al., “Towards realistic evaluation of cultural value alignment in large language models: Diversity enhancement for survey response simulation,”Information Processing & Management, vol. 62, no. 4, p. 104099, 2025

    2025

  33. [42]

    Achieving fairness in multi-agent mdp using reinforcement learning,

    P . Ju, A. Ghosh, and N. Shroff, “Achieving fairness in multi-agent mdp using reinforcement learning,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  34. [43]

    Beavertails: Towards improved safety alignment of llm via a human-preference dataset,

    J. Jiet al., “Beavertails: Towards improved safety alignment of llm via a human-preference dataset,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 24 678–24 704, 2023

    2023

  35. [44]

    Improving factuality and reasoning in language models through multiagent debate,

    Y. Du, S. Li, A. Torralba, J. B. Tenenbaum, and I. Mordatch, “Improving factuality and reasoning in language models through multiagent debate,” inForty-first International Conference on Ma- chine Learning, 2023

    2023

  36. [45]

    Dailydilemmas: Revealing value preferences of llms with quandaries of daily life,

    Y. Y. Chiu, L. Jiang, and Y. Choi, “Dailydilemmas: Revealing value preferences of llms with quandaries of daily life,” inThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, Singapore, April 24-28, 2025. OpenReview.net, 2025. [Online]. Available: htt...

    2025

  37. [46]

    Value compass leaderboard: A platform for funda- mental and validated evaluation of llms values,

    J. Yaoet al., “Value compass leaderboard: A platform for funda- mental and validated evaluation of llms values,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.07071, 2025. 22

    2025 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Shaping the ethical governance path of artificial intelligence in the chinese context—based on value- instrument rationality,

    Y. Wu and C. Fan, “Shaping the ethical governance path of artificial intelligence in the chinese context—based on value- instrument rationality,”Studies in Science of Science, 2025

    2025

  39. [48]

    Hydragan: A cooperative agent model for multi-objective data generation,

    C. N. DeSmet and D. J. Cook, “Hydragan: A cooperative agent model for multi-objective data generation,”ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 60:1–60:21, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3653982

    2024 doi

  40. [49]

    Empowering users in digital privacy management through interactive llm-based agents,

    B. Sun, Y. Zhou, and H. Jiang, “Empowering users in digital privacy management through interactive llm-based agents,” inThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, Singapore, April 24-28, 2025. OpenReview.net, 2025. [Online]. Available: http...

    2025

  41. [50]

    olkopf, M. Sachan, and R. Mihalcea, “Cooperate or collapse: Emergence of sustainable cooperation in a society of LLM agents,

    G. Piatti, Z. Jin, M. Kleiman-Weiner, B. Sch ¨"olkopf, M. Sachan, and R. Mihalcea, “Cooperate or collapse: Emergence of sustainable cooperation in a society of LLM agents,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processi...

    2024

  42. [51]

    Training socially aligned language models on simulated social interactions,

    R. Liu, R. Yang, C. Jia, G. Zhang, D. Yang, and S. Vosoughi, “Training socially aligned language models on simulated social interactions,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024. OpenReview.net, 2024. [Onl...

    2024

  43. [52]

    Safesora: Towards safety alignment of text2video generation via a human preference dataset,

    J. Daiet al., “Safesora: Towards safety alignment of text2video generation via a human preference dataset,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 17 161–17 214, 2024

    2024

  44. [55]

    Biodiscoveryagent: An ai agent for designing genetic perturbation experiments,

    Y. Roohaniet al., “Biodiscoveryagent: An ai agent for designing genetic perturbation experiments,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17631, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  45. [56]

    Unpacking the ethical value alignment in big models,

    X. Yi, J. Yao, X. Wang, and X. Xie, “Unpacking the ethical value alignment in big models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.17551, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  46. [57]

    House,Blueprint for an ai bill of rights: Making automated systems work for the american people

    W. House,Blueprint for an ai bill of rights: Making automated systems work for the american people. Nimble Books, 2022

    2022

  47. [58]

    Science and T

    N. Science and T. C. U. S. C. on Artificial Intelligence,The national artificial intelligence research and development strategic plan: 2023 update. National Science and Technology Council (US), Select Committee on Artificial . . . , 2023

    2023

  48. [59]

    High-level expert group on artificial intelligence,

    H. Ai, “High-level expert group on artificial intelligence,”Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI, vol. 6, 2019

    2019

  49. [60]

    Artificial intelligence act,

    T. Madiega, “Artificial intelligence act,” 2021

    2021

  50. [61]

    Measures for the ethical review of science and technology(trial),

    C. A. of Sciences, “Measures for the ethical review of science and technology(trial),” 2023

    2023

  51. [62]

    Standardization of ai ethical governance (2023 edition),

    A. I. S. o. t. N. T. C. National Artificial Intelligence Standardization General Group, “Standardization of ai ethical governance (2023 edition),” 2023

    2023

  52. [63]

    The interim measures for the administration of generative artificial intelligence services,

    C. A. of China, “The interim measures for the administration of generative artificial intelligence services,” 2023

    2023

  53. [64]

    Holmes, F

    W. Holmes, F. Miaoet al.,Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO Publishing, 2023

    2023

  54. [65]

    Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: Guidance on large multi-modal models,

    W. H. Organizationet al., “Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: Guidance on large multi-modal models,” inEthics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: guidance on large multi-modal models, 2024

    2024

  55. [66]

    The ethics of ai in games,

    D. Melhart, J. Togelius, B. Mikkelsen, C. Holmgård, and G. N. Yannakakis, “The ethics of ai in games,”IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 79–92, 2023

    2023

  56. [67]

    Dimensionalizing cultures: The hofstede model in context,

    G. Hofstede, “Dimensionalizing cultures: The hofstede model in context,”Online readings in psychology and culture, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 8, 2011

    2011

  57. [68]

    Cdeval: A benchmark for measuring the cul- tural dimensions of large language models,

    Y. Wanget al., “Cdeval: A benchmark for measuring the cul- tural dimensions of large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16421, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  58. [69]

    How well do llms represent values across cultures? empirical analysis of llm responses based on hofstede cultural dimensions,

    J. Kharchenko, T. Roosta, A. Chadha, and C. Shah, “How well do llms represent values across cultures? empirical analysis of llm responses based on hofstede cultural dimensions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14805, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  59. [70]

    Llm-globe: A benchmark evaluating the cultural values embedded in llm output,

    E. Karinshaket al., “Llm-globe: A benchmark evaluating the cultural values embedded in llm output,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.06032, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  60. [71]

    Recruitment in the times of machine learning,

    K. R ˛ ab-Kettler and B. Lehnervp, “Recruitment in the times of machine learning,”Management Systems in Production Engineering, 2019

    2019

  61. [72]

    Hr analytics and ethics,

    K. Simbeck, “Hr analytics and ethics,”IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 63, no. 4/5, pp. 9–1, 2019

    2019

  62. [73]

    Ethics of ai-enabled re- cruiting and selection: A review and research agenda,

    A. L. Hunkenschroer and C. Luetge, “Ethics of ai-enabled re- cruiting and selection: A review and research agenda,”Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 977–1007, 2022

    2022

  63. [74]

    Lawluo: A chinese law firm co-run by llm agents,

    J. Sun, C. Dai, Z. Luo, Y. Chang, and Y. Li, “Lawluo: A chinese law firm co-run by llm agents,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16252, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  64. [75]

    Operationalising ai governance through ethics-based auditing: an industry case study,

    J. Mökander and L. Floridi, “Operationalising ai governance through ethics-based auditing: an industry case study,”AI and Ethics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 451–468, 2023

    2023

  65. [76]

    Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism,

    J. Grahamet al., “Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism,” inAdvances in experimental social psychology. Elsevier, 2013, vol. 47, pp. 55–130

    2013

  66. [77]

    Basic human values: Theory, methods, and application,

    S. H. Schwartz, “Basic human values: Theory, methods, and application,”Risorsa Uomo, no. 2007/2, 2007

    2007

  67. [78]

    Moral foundations and political orientation: Systematic review and meta-analysis

    J. M. Kivikangas, B. Fernández-Castilla, S. Järvelä, N. Ravaja, and J.-E. Lönnqvist, “Moral foundations and political orientation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.”Psychological bulletin, vol. 147, no. 1, p. 55, 2021

    2021

  68. [79]

    Artificial intelligence and public values: value impacts and governance in the public sector,

    Y.-C. Chen, M. J. Ahn, and Y.-F. Wang, “Artificial intelligence and public values: value impacts and governance in the public sector,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 4796, 2023

    2023

  69. [80]

    Role of the state and responsibility in governing artificial intelligence: a comparative analysis of ai strategies,

    C. Djeffal, M. B. Siewert, and S. Wurster, “Role of the state and responsibility in governing artificial intelligence: a comparative analysis of ai strategies,”Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1799–1821, 2022

    2022

  70. [81]

    The market state,

    P . Bisson, R. Kirkland, and E. Stephenson, “The market state,” McKinsey quarterly, 2010

    2010

  71. [82]

    The entrepreneurial state,

    M. Mazzucato, “The entrepreneurial state,”Soundings, vol. 49, no. 49, pp. 131–142, 2011

    2011

  72. [83]

    217the regulatory state?

    J. Braithwaite, “217the regulatory state?” inThe Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Oxford University Press, 07 2011. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013. 0011

    2011

  73. [84]

    From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance,

    G. Majone, “From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance,”Journal of public policy, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 139–167, 1997

    1997

  74. [85]

    The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems’ transformation,

    S. Borrás and J. Edler, “The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems’ transformation,”Research Policy, vol. 49, no. 5, p. 103971, 2020

    2020

  75. [86]

    Factors that influence new generation candidates to engage with and complete digital, ai-enabled recruiting,

    P . Van Esch and J. S. Black, “Factors that influence new generation candidates to engage with and complete digital, ai-enabled recruiting,”Business horizons, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 729–739, 2019

    2019

  76. [87]

    Building ethical ai for talent management,

    T. Chamorro-Premuzic, F. Polli, and B. Dattner, “Building ethical ai for talent management,”Harvard Business Review, vol. 21, no. November, pp. 1–15, 2019

    2019

  77. [88]

    Video games in job interviews: Using algorithms to minimize discrimination and unconscious bias,

    D. D. Savage and R. Bales, “Video games in job interviews: Using algorithms to minimize discrimination and unconscious bias,” ABAJ Lab. & Emp. L., vol. 32, p. 211, 2016

    2016

  78. [89]

    Hiring algorithms are not neutral,

    G. Mann and C. O’Neil, “Hiring algorithms are not neutral,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 9, p. 2016, 2016

    2016

  79. [90]

    Using ai to eliminate bias from hiring,

    F. Polli, “Using ai to eliminate bias from hiring,”Harvard Business Review, vol. 29, 2019

    2019

  80. [91]

    Data-driven discrimination at work,

    P . T. Kim, “Data-driven discrimination at work,”Wm. & Mary L. Rev., vol. 58, p. 857, 2016

    2016

  81. [92]

    The legal and ethical implications of using ai in hiring,

    B. Dattner, T. Chamorro-Premuzic, R. Buchband, and L. Schettler, “The legal and ethical implications of using ai in hiring,”Harvard Business Review, vol. 25, pp. 1–7, 2019

    2019

  82. [93]

    Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward,

    P . Tambe, P . Cappelli, and V . Yakubovich, “Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward,” California Management Review, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 15–42, 2019

    2019

  83. [94]

    GTA: A benchmark for general tool agents,

    J. Wanget al., “GTA: A benchmark for general tool agents,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December 10 - 15, 2024, A. Globersonset al., Eds., 2024. [On...

    2024

  84. [98]

    AI hiring with llms: A context-aware and explainable multi-agent framework for resume screening,

    F. P . Loet al., “AI hiring with llms: A context-aware and explainable multi-agent framework for resume screening,” CoRR, vol. abs/2504.02870, 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.02870

    2025 doi arXiv

  85. [99]

    Ethical considerations in ai-based recruitment,

    D. F. Mujtaba and N. R. Mahapatra, “Ethical considerations in ai-based recruitment,” in2019 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society, ISTAS 2019, Medford, MA, USA, November 15-16, 2019. IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–7. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS48451....

    2019

  86. [100]

    On prompt-driven safeguarding for large language models,

    C. Zhenget al., “On prompt-driven safeguarding for large language models,” inProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024, pp. 61 593–61 613

    2024

  87. [101]

    Safety pretraining: Toward the next generation of safe ai,

    P . Mainiet al., “Safety pretraining: Toward the next generation of safe ai,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16980, 2025

    2025

  88. [102]

    Pretraining language models with human pref- erences,

    T. Korbaket al., “Pretraining language models with human pref- erences,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 17 506–17 533

    2023

  89. [103]

    Ppt: Pre-trained prompt tuning for few-shot learning. arxiv 2021,

    Y. Gu, X. Han, Z. Liu, and M. Huang, “Ppt: Pre-trained prompt tuning for few-shot learning. arxiv 2021,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.04332, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  90. [104]

    Mitigating bias in large language models: A multi- task training approach using bert,

    S. Chen, “Mitigating bias in large language models: A multi- task training approach using bert,”Applied and Computational Engineering, vol. 105, pp. 30–37, 2024

    2024

  91. [105]

    Adding instructions during pretraining: Effective way of control- ling toxicity in language models,

    S. Prabhumoye, M. Patwary, M. Shoeybi, and B. Catanzaro, “Adding instructions during pretraining: Effective way of control- ling toxicity in language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.07388, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  92. [106]

    Guardrails for trust, safety, and ethical development and deployment of large language models (llm),

    A. Biswas and W. Talukdar, “Guardrails for trust, safety, and ethical development and deployment of large language models (llm),”Journal of Science & Technology, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 55–82, 2023

    2023

  93. [107]

    Curriculum learning for language modeling,

    D. Campos, “Curriculum learning for language modeling,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02170, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  94. [108]

    Learning and forgetting unsafe examples in large language models,

    J. Zhao, Z. Deng, D. Madras, J. Zou, and M. Ren, “Learning and forgetting unsafe examples in large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.12736, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  95. [109]

    Self-instruct: Aligning language models with self-generated instructions,

    Y. Wanget al., “Self-instruct: Aligning language models with self-generated instructions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10560, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  96. [110]

    Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback,

    L. Ouyanget al., “Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 35, pp. 27 730–27 744, 2022

    2022

  97. [111]

    Principle-driven self-alignment of language models from scratch with minimal human supervision,

    Z. Sunet al., “Principle-driven self-alignment of language models from scratch with minimal human supervision,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 2511–2565, 2023

    2023

  98. [112]

    Chain of hindsight aligns language models with feedback,

    H. Liu, C. Sferrazza, and P . Abbeel, “Chain of hindsight aligns language models with feedback,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02676, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  99. [113]

    Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback,

    Y. Baiet al., “Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.05862, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  100. [115]

    Aligning large language models through synthetic feedback,

    S. Kimet al., “Aligning large language models through synthetic feedback,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13735, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  101. [116]

    Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators,

    W. Saunderset al., “Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.05802, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  102. [117]

    Aligning language models with preferences through f- divergence minimization,

    D. Go, T. Korbak, G. Kruszewski, J. Rozen, N. Ryu, and M. Dymet- man, “Aligning language models with preferences through f- divergence minimization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.08215, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  103. [118]

    Training socially aligned language models in simulated human society,

    R. Liuet al., “Training socially aligned language models in simulated human society,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16960, vol. 2, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  104. [119]

    Constitutional ai: Harmlessness from ai feedback,

    Y. Baiet al., “Constitutional ai: Harmlessness from ai feedback,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08073, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  105. [120]

    Collective constitutional ai: Aligning a language model with public input,

    S. Huanget al., “Collective constitutional ai: Aligning a language model with public input,” inProceedings of the 2024 ACM Confer- ence on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2024, pp. 1395– 1417

    2024

  106. [121]

    Toward responsible federated large language models: Leveraging a safety filter and constitutional ai,

    E. Noh and J. Baek, “Toward responsible federated large language models: Leveraging a safety filter and constitutional ai,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16691, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  107. [122]

    Iteralign: Iterative constitutional alignment of large language models,

    X. Chenet al., “Iteralign: Iterative constitutional alignment of large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18341, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  108. [123]

    Exploring laws of robotics: A synthesis of constitutional ai and constitutional economics,

    A. Küsters and M. Wörsdörfer, “Exploring laws of robotics: A synthesis of constitutional ai and constitutional economics,” Digital Society, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 46, 2025

    2025

  109. [124]

    Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self- feedback,

    A. Madaanet al., “Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self- feedback,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 46 534–46 594, 2023

    2023

  110. [125]

    Self-rag: Learning to retrieve, generate, and critique through self-reflection,

    A. Asai, Z. Wu, Y. Wang, A. Sil, and H. Hajishirzi, “Self-rag: Learning to retrieve, generate, and critique through self-reflection,” 2024

    2024

  111. [126]

    Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,

    J. Weiet al., “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 35, pp. 24 824–24 837, 2022

    2022

  112. [127]

    Self-refine instruction-tuning for align- ing reasoning in language models,

    L. Ranaldi and A. Freitas, “Self-refine instruction-tuning for align- ing reasoning in language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.00402, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  113. [128]

    Aligning llm agents by learning latent preference from user edits,

    G. Gao, A. Taymanov, E. Salinas, P . Mineiro, and D. Misra, “Aligning llm agents by learning latent preference from user edits,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 136 873–136 896, 2024

    2024

  114. [129]

    Online learning from strategic human feedback in llm fine-tuning,

    S. Hao and L. Duan, “Online learning from strategic human feedback in llm fine-tuning,” inICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5

    2025

  115. [130]

    A survey on autonomy-induced security risks in large model-based agents,

    H. Suet al., “A survey on autonomy-induced security risks in large model-based agents,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.23844, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  116. [131]

    Personal llm agents: Insights and survey about the capability, efficiency and security,

    Y. Liet al., “Personal llm agents: Insights and survey about the capability, efficiency and security,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.05459, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  117. [132]

    Can llm agents maintain a persona in dis- course?

    P . Bhandariet al., “Can llm agents maintain a persona in dis- course?”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11843, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  118. [133]

    Llm-agent-umf: Llm-based agent unified modeling framework for seamless integration of multi active/passive core-agents,

    A. B. Hassouna, H. Chaari, and I. Belhaj, “Llm-agent-umf: Llm-based agent unified modeling framework for seamless integration of multi active/passive core-agents,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11393, 2024

    2024

  119. [134]

    Be more real: Travel diary generation using llm agents and individual profiles,

    X. Li, F. Huang, J. Lv, Z. Xiao, G. Li, and Y. Yue, “Be more real: Travel diary generation using llm agents and individual profiles,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.18932, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  120. [135]

    Motif: A framework for enhancing the profiling module of generative agents that simulate human behavior

    T. Cerqueira and P . Bezerra, “Motif: A framework for enhancing the profiling module of generative agents that simulate human behavior.”

  121. [136]

    Agentic ai-the rise of autonomous intelligent agents in the era of llms

    S. T. Erukude, S. R. Veluru, and V . C. Marella, “Agentic ai-the rise of autonomous intelligent agents in the era of llms.”

  122. [137]

    The cognitive core: An integrated cognitive architecture

    C. Royse and B. Caudill, “The cognitive core: An integrated cognitive architecture.”

  123. [138]

    Memos: An operating system for memory-augmented generation (mag) in large language models,

    Z. Liet al., “Memos: An operating system for memory-augmented generation (mag) in large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22101, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  124. [139]

    Ai agents vs. agentic ai: A conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges,

    R. Sapkota, K. I. Roumeliotis, and M. Karkee, “Ai agents vs. agentic ai: A conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10468, 2025

    2025

  125. [140]

    G- memory: Tracing hierarchical memory for multi-agent systems,

    G. Zhang, M. Fu, G. Wan, M. Yu, K. Wang, and S. Yan, “G- memory: Tracing hierarchical memory for multi-agent systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.07398, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  126. [141]

    Cognitive weave: Synthesizing abstracted knowledge with a spatio-temporal resonance graph,

    A. Vishwakarmaet al., “Cognitive weave: Synthesizing abstracted knowledge with a spatio-temporal resonance graph,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08098, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  127. [142]

    A survey on llm-based agents for social simulation: Taxonomy, evaluation and applications

    Z. Wanget al., “A survey on llm-based agents for social simulation: Taxonomy, evaluation and applications.” 24

  128. [143]

    Llm-based agents for tool learning: A survey,

    W. Xu, C. Huang, S. Gao, and S. Shang, “Llm-based agents for tool learning: A survey,”Data Science and Engineering, pp. 1–31, 2025

    2025

  129. [144]

    Heal: An empirical study on hallucinations in embodied agents driven by large language models,

    T. Chakrabortyet al., “Heal: An empirical study on hallucinations in embodied agents driven by large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15065, 2025

    2025

  130. [145]

    Improving llm agent planning with in-context learning via atomic fact augmentation and lookahead search,

    S. Holt, M. R. Luyten, T. Pouplin, and M. van der Schaar, “Improving llm agent planning with in-context learning via atomic fact augmentation and lookahead search,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09171, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  131. [146]

    Cost-efficient serv- ing of llm agents via test-time plan caching,

    Q. Zhang, M. Wornow, and K. Olukotun, “Cost-efficient serv- ing of llm agents via test-time plan caching,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.14852, 2025

    2025

  132. [147]

    Sop-bench: Complex industrial sops for evaluating llm agents,

    S. Nandiet al., “Sop-bench: Complex industrial sops for evaluating llm agents,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08119, 2025

    2025

  133. [148]

    Wgsr-bench: Wargame-based game-theoretic strate- gic reasoning benchmark for large language models,

    Q. Yinet al., “Wgsr-bench: Wargame-based game-theoretic strate- gic reasoning benchmark for large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10264, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  134. [149]

    Stride: A tool-assisted llm agent framework for strategic and interactive decision-making,

    C. Liet al., “Stride: A tool-assisted llm agent framework for strategic and interactive decision-making,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.16376, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  135. [151]

    A survey on alignment for large language model agents,

    D. Zhou, J. Zhang, T. Feng, and Y. Sun, “A survey on alignment for large language model agents,” inUIUC Spring 2025 CS598 LLM Agent Workshop, 2025

    2025

  136. [153]

    Coreaagents: A collaboration and reasoning framework based on llm-powered agents for complex reasoning tasks,

    Z. Hanet al., “Coreaagents: A collaboration and reasoning framework based on llm-powered agents for complex reasoning tasks,”Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 10, p. 5663, 2025

    2025

  137. [154]

    A framework for benchmarking and aligning task-planning safety in llm-based embodied agents,

    Y. Huanget al., “A framework for benchmarking and aligning task-planning safety in llm-based embodied agents,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.14650, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  138. [156]

    A survey on llm-based agents for social simulation: Taxonomy, evaluation and applications

    Z. Wanget al., “A survey on llm-based agents for social simulation: Taxonomy, evaluation and applications.”

  139. [157]

    A survey of llm-based agents: Theories, technologies, applications and suggestions,

    X. Dong, X. Zhang, W. Bu, D. Zhang, and F. Cao, “A survey of llm-based agents: Theories, technologies, applications and suggestions,” in2024 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things and Cloud Computing Technology (AIoTC). IEEE, 2024, pp. 407–413

    2024

  140. [158]

    Exploring the necessity of reasoning in llm-based agent scenarios,

    X. Zhouet al., “Exploring the necessity of reasoning in llm-based agent scenarios,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11074, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  141. [159]

    Making sense of the unsensible: Reflection, survey, and challenges for xai in large language models toward human- centered ai,

    F. Herrera, “Making sense of the unsensible: Reflection, survey, and challenges for xai in large language models toward human- centered ai,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20305, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  142. [160]

    Agent-pro: Learning to evolve via policy-level reflection and optimization,

    W. Zhanget al., “Agent-pro: Learning to evolve via policy-level reflection and optimization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17574, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  143. [161]

    Hada: Human-ai agent decision alignment architecture,

    T. Pitkäranta and L. Pitkäranta, “Hada: Human-ai agent decision alignment architecture,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04253, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  144. [162]

    Agentmisalignment: Measuring the propensity for misaligned behaviour in llm-based agents,

    A. Naiket al., “Agentmisalignment: Measuring the propensity for misaligned behaviour in llm-based agents,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04018, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  145. [163]

    From llm reasoning to autonomous ai agents: A comprehensive review,

    M. A. Ferrag, N. Tihanyi, and M. Debbah, “From llm reasoning to autonomous ai agents: A comprehensive review,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19678, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  146. [164]

    A survey on human preference learning for large language models,

    R. Jianget al., “A survey on human preference learning for large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11191, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  147. [165]

    Scalable alignment of large language models towards truth seeking, complex reasoning, and human values,

    Z. Sun, “Scalable alignment of large language models towards truth seeking, complex reasoning, and human values,” Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, 2025

    2025

  148. [166]

    Agentic reward modeling: Integrating human preferences with verifiable correctness signals for reliable reward systems,

    H. Peng, Y. Qi, X. Wang, Z. Yao, and L. Hou, “Agentic reward modeling: Integrating human preferences with verifiable correctness signals for reliable reward systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19328, 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2502.19328

    2025 arXiv

  149. [167]

    Ali-agent: Assessing llms’ alignment with human values via agent-based evaluation,

    H. Wang, A. Zhang, N. Duy Tai, J. Sun, T.-S. Chuaet al., “Ali-agent: Assessing llms’ alignment with human values via agent-based evaluation,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 99 040–99 088, 2024

    2024

  150. [168]

    Verila: A human-centered evaluation framework for interpretable verification of llm agent failures,

    Y. Y. Sung, H. Kim, and D. Zhang, “Verila: A human-centered evaluation framework for interpretable verification of llm agent failures,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12651, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  151. [169]

    Moral alignment for llm agents,

    E. Tennant, S. Hailes, and M. Musolesi, “Moral alignment for llm agents,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.01639, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  152. [170]

    A survey on llm-based multi-agent systems: workflow, infrastructure, and challenges,

    X. Li, S. Wang, S. Zeng, Y. Wu, and Y. Yang, “A survey on llm-based multi-agent systems: workflow, infrastructure, and challenges,” Vicinagearth, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 9, 2024

    2024

  153. [171]

    Aligning individual and collective objectives in multi-agent cooperation,

    Y. Liet al., “Aligning individual and collective objectives in multi-agent cooperation,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 44 735–44 760, 2024

    2024

  154. [172]

    Towards a distributed platform for normative reasoning and value alignment in multi-agent systems,

    M. Garcia-Bohigues, C. Cordova, J. Taverner, J. Palanca, E. del Val, and E. Argente, “Towards a distributed platform for normative reasoning and value alignment in multi-agent systems,” in International Workshop on Value Engineering in AI. Springer, 2023, pp. 237–250

    2023

  155. [173]

    Code: Communication delay-tolerant multi-agent collaboration via dual alignment of intent and timeliness,

    S. Songet al., “Code: Communication delay-tolerant multi-agent collaboration via dual alignment of intent and timeliness,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, no. 22, 2025, pp. 23 304–23 312

    2025

  156. [174]

    Traf-align: Trajectory-aware feature alignment for asynchronous multi-agent perception,

    Z. Song, L. Yang, F. Wen, and J. Li, “Traf-align: Trajectory-aware feature alignment for asynchronous multi-agent perception,” in Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 12 048–12 057

    2025

  157. [175]

    Minimizing hallucinations and communication costs: Adversarial debate and voting mechanisms in llm-based multi-agents,

    Y. Yang, Y. Ma, H. Feng, Y. Cheng, and Z. Han, “Minimizing hallucinations and communication costs: Adversarial debate and voting mechanisms in llm-based multi-agents,”Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 3676, 2025

    2025

  158. [176]

    Gpt-4: a new era of artificial intelligence in medicine,

    E. Waisberget al., “Gpt-4: a new era of artificial intelligence in medicine,”Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971-), vol. 192, no. 6, pp. 3197–3200, 2023

    1971

  159. [177]

    On large language models in national security applications,

    W. N. Caballero and P . R. Jenkins, “On large language models in national security applications,”Stat, vol. 14, no. 2, p. e70057, 2025

    2025

  160. [178]

    Improving multi-agent debate with sparse communi- cation topology,

    Y. Liet al., “Improving multi-agent debate with sparse communi- cation topology,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11776, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  161. [179]

    Gradual vigilance and interval communication: Enhancing value alignment in multi-agent debates,

    R. Zou, M. Wei, J. Feng, Q. Wan, J. Sun, and S. Liu, “Gradual vigilance and interval communication: Enhancing value alignment in multi-agent debates,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13471, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  162. [180]

    Project riley: Multimodal multi-agent llm collab- oration with emotional reasoning and voting,

    A. R. Ortigoso, G. Vieira, D. Fuentes, L. Frazão, N. Costa, and A. Pereira, “Project riley: Multimodal multi-agent llm collab- oration with emotional reasoning and voting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20521, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  163. [181]

    Multiple llm agents debate for equitable cultural alignment,

    D. Ki, R. Rudinger, T. Zhou, and M. Carpuat, “Multiple llm agents debate for equitable cultural alignment,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.24671, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  164. [182]

    Exploring multi- agent debate for zero-shot stance detection: A novel approach,

    J. Ma, C. Wang, L. Rong, B. Wang, and Y. Xu, “Exploring multi- agent debate for zero-shot stance detection: A novel approach,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 9, p. 4612, 2025

    2025

  165. [183]

    Camel: Communicative agents for

    G. Li, H. Hammoud, H. Itani, D. Khizbullin, and B. Ghanem, “Camel: Communicative agents for" mind" exploration of large language model society,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 51 991–52 008, 2023

    2023

  166. [184]

    Metagpt: Meta programming for multi-agent collaborative framework,

    S. Honget al., “Metagpt: Meta programming for multi-agent collaborative framework,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00352, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 6, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  167. [185]

    Halo: Hierarchical autonomous logic-oriented orchestration for multi-agent llm systems,

    Z. Hou, J. Tang, and Y. Wang, “Halo: Hierarchical autonomous logic-oriented orchestration for multi-agent llm systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13516, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  168. [186]

    Talk structurally, act hierarchically: A collabo- rative framework for llm multi-agent systems,

    Z. Wang, S. Moriyama, W.-Y. Wang, B. Gangopadhyay, and S. Takamatsu, “Talk structurally, act hierarchically: A collabo- rative framework for llm multi-agent systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11098, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  169. [187]

    Balancing autonomy and alignment: a multi- dimensional taxonomy for autonomous llm-powered multi-agent architectures,

    T. Händler, “Balancing autonomy and alignment: a multi- dimensional taxonomy for autonomous llm-powered multi-agent architectures,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03659, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  170. [188]

    The coming crisis of multi-agent misalignment: Ai alignment must be a dynamic and social process,

    F. Carichon, A. Khandelwal, M. Fauchard, and G. Farnadi, “The coming crisis of multi-agent misalignment: Ai alignment must be a dynamic and social process,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01080, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  171. [189]

    Alfworld: Aligning text and embodied envi- ronments for interactive learning,

    M. Shridhar, X. Yuan, M.-A. Côté, Y. Bisk, A. Trischler, and M. Hausknecht, “Alfworld: Aligning text and embodied envi- ronments for interactive learning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03768, 2020

    2010 arXiv

  172. [190]

    Human-level play in the game of diplomacy by combining language models with strategic reasoning,

    M. F. A. R. D. T. (FAIR)†et al., “Human-level play in the game of diplomacy by combining language models with strategic reasoning,”Science, vol. 378, no. 6624, pp. 1067–1074, 2022. 25

    2022

  173. [191]

    Bbq: A hand-built bias benchmark for ques- tion answering,

    A. Parrishet al., “Bbq: A hand-built bias benchmark for ques- tion answering,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, 2022, pp. 2086–2105

    2022

  174. [192]

    Aligning ai with shared human values,

    D. Hendryckset al., “Aligning ai with shared human values,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021

    2021

  175. [193]

    Stereoset: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models,

    M. Nadeem, A. Bethke, and S. Reddy, “Stereoset: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models,” inProceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Vo...

    2021

  176. [194]

    When to make exceptions: Exploring language models as accounts of human moral judgment,

    Z. Jinet al., “When to make exceptions: Exploring language models as accounts of human moral judgment,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 35, pp. 28 458–28 473, 2022

    2022

  177. [195]

    The moral integrity corpus: A benchmark for ethical dialogue systems,

    C. Ziems, J. Yu, Y.-C. Wang, A. Halevy, and D. Yang, “The moral integrity corpus: A benchmark for ethical dialogue systems,” inProceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 2022, pp. 3755– 3773

    2022

  178. [196]

    Bold: Dataset and metrics for measuring biases in open-ended language generation,

    J. Dhamalaet al., “Bold: Dataset and metrics for measuring biases in open-ended language generation,” inProceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, 2021, pp. 862–872

    2021

  179. [197]

    Multi-agent, human-agent and beyond: A survey on cooperation in social dilemmas,

    C. Muet al., “Multi-agent, human-agent and beyond: A survey on cooperation in social dilemmas,”Neurocomputing, vol. 610, p. 128514, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. neucom.2024.128514

    2024

  180. [198]

    Foundations of cooperative AI,

    V . Conitzer and C. Oesterheld, “Foundations of cooperative AI,” inThirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2023, Thirty-Fifth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2023, Thirteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Ar...

    2023 doi

  181. [199]

    Vicuna: An open-source chatbot impressing gpt-4 with 90%* chatgpt quality,

    W.-L. Chianget al., “Vicuna: An open-source chatbot impressing gpt-4 with 90%* chatgpt quality,”See https://vicuna. lmsys. org (accessed 14 April 2023), vol. 2, no. 3, p. 6, 2023

    2023

  182. [200]

    GPT-4 technical report,

    OpenAI, “GPT-4 technical report,”CoRR, vol. abs/2303.08774,

    arXiv

  183. [201]

    Recmind: Large language model powered agent for recommendation,

    Y. Wanget al., “Recmind: Large language model powered agent for recommendation,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024, Mexico City, Mexico, June 16-21, 2024, K. Duh, H. Gómez-Adorno, and S. Bethard, Eds. Association for Computational Linguist...

    2024 doi

  184. [202]

    Multi-agent collaboration: Harnessing the power of intelligent LLM agents,

    Y. Talebirad and A. Nadiri, “Multi-agent collaboration: Harnessing the power of intelligent LLM agents,”CoRR, vol. abs/2306.03314,

    arXiv

  185. [203]

    Theory of mind,

    C. Frith and U. Frith, “Theory of mind,”Current biology, vol. 15, no. 17, pp. R644–R645, 2005

    2005

  186. [204]

    On blame attribution for accountable multi-agent sequential decision making,

    S. Triantafyllou, A. Singla, and G. Radanovic, “On blame attribution for accountable multi-agent sequential decision making,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2021, NeurIPS 2021, December 6-14, 2...

    2021

  187. [205]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306. 03314

    doi

  188. [206]

    Mintzberg,The structuring of organizations

    H. Mintzberg,The structuring of organizations. Springer, 1989

    1989

  189. [207]

    Mechanistic and organic systems,

    T. Burns and G. Stalker, “Mechanistic and organic systems,” London: Tavistock Publications, 1961

    1961

  190. [208]

    S. P . Robbins, R. Bergman, I. Stagg, and M. Coulter,Management. Pearson Australia, 2014

    2014

  191. [209]

    GTA: A benchmark for general tool agents,

    J. Wanget al., “GTA: A benchmark for general tool agents,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December 10 - 15, 2024, A. Globersonset al., Eds., 2024. [On...

    2024

  192. [210]

    Injecagent: Benchmarking indirect prompt injections in tool-integrated large language model agents,

    Q. Zhan, Z. Liang, Z. Ying, and D. Kang, “Injecagent: Benchmarking indirect prompt injections in tool-integrated large language model agents,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting, August 11-16, 2024, L. K...

    2024 doi

  193. [211]

    Agentnet: Decentralized evolutionary coordination for llm-based multi-agent systems,

    Y. Yanget al., “Agentnet: Decentralized evolutionary coordination for llm-based multi-agent systems,”CoRR, vol. abs/2504.00587,

    arXiv

  194. [212]

    Please donate to save a life: Inducing politeness to handle resistance in persuasive dialogue agents,

    K. Mishra, M. Firdaus, and A. Ekbal, “Please donate to save a life: Inducing politeness to handle resistance in persuasive dialogue agents,”IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process., vol. 32, pp. 2202–2212, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP .2024.3357032

    2024

  195. [213]

    Agent instructs large language models to be general zero-shot reasoners,

    N. Crispino, K. Montgomery, F. Zeng, D. Song, and C. Wang, “Agent instructs large language models to be general zero-shot reasoners,” inForty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. OpenReview.net, 2024. [Online]. Avail...

    2024

  196. [214]

    Improving factuality and reasoning in language models through multiagent debate,

    Y. Du, S. Li, A. Torralba, J. B. Tenenbaum, and I. Mordatch, “Improving factuality and reasoning in language models through multiagent debate,” inForty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. OpenReview.net, 2024. [Onli...

    2024

  197. [215]

    Inside out: Emotional multiagent multimodal dialogue systems,

    A. V . Savchenko and L. V . Savchenko, “Inside out: Emotional multiagent multimodal dialogue systems,” inProceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2024, Jeju, South Korea, August 3-9, 2024. ijcai.org, 2024, pp. 8784–8788. ...

    2024

  198. [216]

    User behavior simulation with large language model-based agents,

    L. Wanget al., “User behavior simulation with large language model-based agents,”ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 55:1– 55:37, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3708985

    2025 doi

  199. [218]

    Autoguide: Automated generation and selection of context-aware guidelines for large language model agents,

    Y. Fuet al., “Autoguide: Automated generation and selection of context-aware guidelines for large language model agents,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canad...

    2024

  200. [219]

    Magdi: Structured distillation of multi-agent interaction graphs improves reasoning in smaller language models,

    J. C. Chen, S. Saha, E. Stengel-Eskin, and M. Bansal, “Magdi: Structured distillation of multi-agent interaction graphs improves reasoning in smaller language models,” inForty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. Ope...

    2024

  201. [220]

    A multimodal automated interpretability agent,

    T. R. Shahamet al., “A multimodal automated interpretability agent,” inForty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. OpenReview.net,

    2024

  202. [221]

    Urbankgent: A unified large language model agent framework for urban knowledge graph construction,

    Y. Ning and H. Liu, “Urbankgent: A unified large language model agent framework for urban knowledge graph construction,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada...

    2024

  203. [222]

    ICA-CRMAS: intelligent context-awareness approach for citation recommendation based on multi-agent system,

    H. E. Degha and F. Z. Laallam, “ICA-CRMAS: intelligent context-awareness approach for citation recommendation based on multi-agent system,”ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 13:1–13:52, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3680287

    2024 doi

  204. [223]

    Ali-agent: Assessing llms’ alignment with human values via agent-based evaluation,

    J. Zheng, H. Wang, A. Zhang, T. D. Nguyen, J. Sun, and T. Chua, “Ali-agent: Assessing llms’ alignment with human values via agent-based evaluation,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS...

    2024

  205. [224]

    Medagents: Large language models as collaborators for zero-shot medical reasoning,

    X. Tanget al., “Medagents: Large language models as collaborators for zero-shot medical reasoning,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting, August 11-16, 2024, L. Ku, A. Martins, and V . Srikumar, Eds. Assoc...

    2024 doi

  206. [225]

    Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id= mDw42ZanmE

    [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id= mDw42ZanmE

  207. [226]

    Econagent: Large language model-empowered agents for simulating macroeconomic activities,

    N. Li, C. Gao, M. Li, Y. Li, and Q. Liao, “Econagent: Large language model-empowered agents for simulating macroeconomic activities,” inProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand,...

    2024 doi

  208. [227]

    A multimodal foundation agent for financial trading: Tool-augmented, diversified, and generalist,

    W. Zhanget al., “A multimodal foundation agent for financial trading: Tool-augmented, diversified, and generalist,” inProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2024, Barcelona, Spain, August 25-29, 2024, R. Baeza-Yates and F. Bon...

    2024

  209. [228]

    OSDA agent: Leveraging large language models for de novo design of organic structure directing agents,

    Z. Huet al., “OSDA agent: Leveraging large language models for de novo design of organic structure directing agents,” inThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, Singapore, April 24-28, 2025. OpenReview.net, 2025. [Online]. Available: http...

    2025

  210. [230]

    Biodiscoveryagent: An AI agent for designing genetic perturbation experiments,

    Y. H. Roohaniet al., “Biodiscoveryagent: An AI agent for designing genetic perturbation experiments,” inThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, Singapore, April 24-28, 2025. OpenReview.net, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.n...

    2025

  211. [231]

    Multi-modal agent tuning: Building a vlm-driven agent for efficient tool usage,

    Z. Gaoet al., “Multi-modal agent tuning: Building a vlm-driven agent for efficient tool usage,” inThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, Singapore, April 24-28, 2025. OpenReview.net, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/for...

    2025

  212. [232]

    Agent smith: A single image can jailbreak one million multimodal LLM agents exponentially fast,

    X. Guet al., “Agent smith: A single image can jailbreak one million multimodal LLM agents exponentially fast,” in Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. OpenReview.net, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://openrevi...

    2024

  213. [233]

    Fincon: A synthesized LLM multi-agent system with conceptual verbal reinforcement for enhanced financial decision making,

    Y. Yuet al., “Fincon: A synthesized LLM multi-agent system with conceptual verbal reinforcement for enhanced financial decision making,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vanco...

    2024

  214. [234]

    Archer: Training language model agents via hierarchical multi-turn RL,

    Y. Zhou, A. Zanette, J. Pan, S. Levine, and A. Kumar, “Archer: Training language model agents via hierarchical multi-turn RL,” in Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. OpenReview.net, 2024. [Online]. Available: ...

    2024

  215. [236]

    Secom: On memory construction and retrieval for personalized conversational agents,

    Z. Panet al., “Secom: On memory construction and retrieval for personalized conversational agents,” inThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, Singapore, April 24-28, 2025. OpenReview.net, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net...

    2025

  216. [237]

    STYLE: improving domain transferability of asking clarification questions in large language model powered conversational agents,

    Y. Chenet al., “STYLE: improving domain transferability of asking clarification questions in large language model powered conversational agents,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting, August 11-16, 2024, L...

    2024 doi

  217. [238]

    Spider2-v: How far are multimodal agents from automating data science and engineering workflows?

    R. Caoet al., “Spider2-v: How far are multimodal agents from automating data science and engineering workflows?” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Decemb...

    2024

  218. [239]

    AGILE: A novel reinforcement learning framework of LLM agents,

    P . Fenget al., “AGILE: A novel reinforcement learning framework of LLM agents,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December 10 - 15, 2024, A. Globersonse...

    2024

  219. [240]

    KEEP chatting! an attractive dataset for continuous conversation agents,

    Y. Wang, J. Liu, Y. Wan, Y. Li, Z. Liu, and W. Chen, “KEEP chatting! an attractive dataset for continuous conversation agents,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting, August 11-16, 2024, L. Ku, A. Martins, ...

    2024 doi

  220. [241]

    Incharacter: Evaluating personality fidelity in role-playing agents through psychological interviews,

    X. Wanget al., “Incharacter: Evaluating personality fidelity in role-playing agents through psychological interviews,” in Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand, August 11-16,...

    2024 doi

  221. [242]

    Plug- and-play policy planner for large language model powered dialogue agents,

    Y. Deng, W. Zhang, W. Lam, S. Ng, and T. Chua, “Plug- and-play policy planner for large language model powered dialogue agents,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024. OpenReview.net, 2024. [Online]. Avai...

    2024

  222. [243]

    Talk with human-like agents: Empathetic dialogue through perceptible acoustic reception and reaction,

    H. Yanet al., “Talk with human-like agents: Empathetic dialogue through perceptible acoustic reception and reaction,” inProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand, August 11-16, 2...

    2024 doi

  223. [244]

    Socialbench: Sociality evaluation of role- playing conversational agents,

    H. Chenet al., “Socialbench: Sociality evaluation of role- playing conversational agents,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting, August 11-16, 2024, L. Ku, A. Martins, and V . Srikumar, Eds. Association fo...

    2024 doi

  224. [246]

    MLLM as retriever: Interactively learning multimodal retrieval for embodied agents,

    J. Yue, X. Xu, B. F. Karlsson, and Z. Lu, “MLLM as retriever: Interactively learning multimodal retrieval for embodied agents,” inThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, Singapore, April 24-28, 2025. OpenReview.net, 2025. [Online]. Avail...

    2025

  225. [247]

    Doraemongpt: Toward understanding dynamic scenes with large language models (exemplified as A video agent),

    Z. Yang, G. Chen, X. Li, W. Wang, and Y. Yang, “Doraemongpt: Toward understanding dynamic scenes with large language models (exemplified as A video agent),” inForty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. OpenReview.net...

    2024

  226. [248]

    Probing the uniquely identifiable linguistic patterns of conversational AI agents,

    I. Zahid, T. Madusanka, R. Batista-Navarro, and Y. Sun, “Probing the uniquely identifiable linguistic patterns of conversational AI agents,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting, August 11-16, 2024, L. Ku,...

    2024 doi

  227. [249]

    Exploring collaboration mechanisms for LLM agents: A social psychology view,

    J. Zhang, X. Xu, N. Zhang, R. Liu, B. Hooi, and S. Deng, “Exploring collaboration mechanisms for LLM agents: A social psychology view,” inProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailan...

    2024 doi

  228. [250]

    Speaker verification in agent-generated conversations,

    Y. Yang, P . Achananuparp, H. Huang, J. Jiang, and E. Lim, 27 “Speaker verification in agent-generated conversations,” in Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand, August 11-16,...

    2024 doi

  229. [251]

    Fuzzy feedback multiagent reinforcement learning for adversarial dynamic multiteam competitions,

    Q. Fu, Z. Pu, Y. Pan, T. Qiu, and J. Yi, “Fuzzy feedback multiagent reinforcement learning for adversarial dynamic multiteam competitions,”IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 2811–2824, 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2024.3363053

    2024

  230. [252]

    Entity divider with language grounding in multi-agent reinforcement learning,

    Z. Ding, W. Zhang, J. Yue, X. Wang, T. Huang, and Z. Lu, “Entity divider with language grounding in multi-agent reinforcement learning,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2023, 23-29 July 2023, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Rese...

    2023

  231. [253]

    Adasociety: An adaptive environment with social structures for multi-agent decision-making,

    Y. Huanget al., “Adasociety: An adaptive environment with social structures for multi-agent decision-making,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December ...

    2024

  232. [254]

    Experiential co-learning of software-developing agents,

    C. Qianet al., “Experiential co-learning of software-developing agents,” inProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand, August 11-16, 2024, L. Ku, A. Martins, and V . Srikumar, Eds...

    2024 doi

  233. [255]

    Maximum entropy heterogeneous-agent reinforcement learning,

    J. Liuet al., “Maximum entropy heterogeneous-agent reinforcement learning,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024. OpenReview.net, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=tmqOhBC4a5

    2024

  234. [256]

    Learning to cooperate with humans using generative agents,

    Y. Liang, D. Chen, A. Gupta, S. S. Du, and N. Jaques, “Learning to cooperate with humans using generative agents,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Dece...

    2024

  235. [257]

    Long-horizon planning for multi- agent robots in partially observable environments,

    S. Nayaket al., “Long-horizon planning for multi- agent robots in partially observable environments,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December 10 - 15...

    2024

  236. [258]

    Collaborative dynamic scheduling in a self-organizing manufacturing system using multi-agent reinforcement learning,

    Y. Gui, Z. Zhang, D. Tang, H. Zhu, and Y. Zhang, “Collaborative dynamic scheduling in a self-organizing manufacturing system using multi-agent reinforcement learning,”Adv. Eng. Informatics, vol. 62, p. 102646, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102646

    2024

  237. [259]

    Cobjeason: Reasoning covered object in image by multi-agent collaboration based on informed knowledge graph,

    H. Rong, M. Qian, T. Ma, D. Jin, and V . S. Sheng, “Cobjeason: Reasoning covered object in image by multi-agent collaboration based on informed knowledge graph,”ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 116:1–116:56, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3643565

    2024 doi

  238. [260]

    Swe-agent: Agent-computer interfaces enable automated software engineering,

    J. Yanget al., “Swe-agent: Agent-computer interfaces enable automated software engineering,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December 10 - 15, 2024, A....

    2024

  239. [261]

    Restoreagent: Autonomous image restoration agent via multimodal large language models,

    H. Chenet al., “Restoreagent: Autonomous image restoration agent via multimodal large language models,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December 10 - 1...

    2024

  240. [262]

    Scenecraft: An LLM agent for synthesizing 3d scenes as blender code,

    Z. Huet al., “Scenecraft: An LLM agent for synthesizing 3d scenes as blender code,” inForty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. OpenReview.net, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=gAyzjHw2ml

    2024

  241. [263]

    360°rea: Towards A reusable experience accumulation with 360° assessment for multi-agent system,

    S. Gaoet al., “360°rea: Towards A reusable experience accumulation with 360° assessment for multi-agent system,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting, August 11-16, 2024, L. Ku, A. Martins, and V . Srikuma...

    2024 doi

  242. [264]

    A human- inspired reading agent with gist memory of very long contexts,

    K. Lee, X. Chen, H. Furuta, J. F. Canny, and I. Fischer, “A human- inspired reading agent with gist memory of very long contexts,” in Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. OpenReview.net, 2024. [Online]. Availab...

    2024

  243. [265]

    Genartist: Multimodal LLM as an agent for unified image generation and editing,

    Z. Wang, A. Li, Z. Li, and X. Liu, “Genartist: Multimodal LLM as an agent for unified image generation and editing,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, De...

    2024

  244. [266]

    Optimizing text-to-sql conversion techniques through the integration of intelligent agents and large language models,

    S. Ojuri, T. A. Han, R. Chiong, and A. D. Stefano, “Optimizing text-to-sql conversion techniques through the integration of intelligent agents and large language models,”Inf. Process. Manag., vol. 62, no. 5, p. 104136, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2...

    2025

  245. [267]

    Xmc-agent : Dynamic navigation over scalable hierarchical index for incremental extreme multi-label classification,

    Y. Liuet al., “Xmc-agent : Dynamic navigation over scalable hierarchical index for incremental extreme multi-label classification,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting, August 11-16, 2024, L. Ku, A. Marti...

    2024 doi

  246. [268]

    Kgagent: Learning a deep reinforced agent for keyphrase generation,

    Y. Yao, P . Yang, G. Zhao, and G. Yin, “Kgagent: Learning a deep reinforced agent for keyphrase generation,”IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process., vol. 32, pp. 1928–1940, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP .2024.3375630

    1928

  247. [269]

    Transagent: Transfer vision-language foundation models with heterogeneous agent collaboration,

    Y. Guo, S. Zhuang, K. Li, Y. Qiao, and Y. Wang, “Transagent: Transfer vision-language foundation models with heterogeneous agent collaboration,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 202...

    2024

  248. [270]

    Text2db: Integration- aware information extraction with large language model agents,

    Y. Jiao, S. Li, S. Zhou, H. Ji, and J. Han, “Text2db: Integration- aware information extraction with large language model agents,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting, August 11-16, 2024, L. Ku, A. Martin...

    2024 doi

  249. [271]

    Sociodojo: Building lifelong analytical agents with real-world text and time series,

    J. Cheng and P . Chin, “Sociodojo: Building lifelong analytical agents with real-world text and time series,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024. OpenReview.net, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://open...

    2024

  250. [272]

    Agent planning with world knowledge model,

    S. Qiaoet al., “Agent planning with world knowledge model,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December 10 - 15, 2024, A. Globersonset al., Eds., 2024. [O...

    2024

  251. [273]

    A two-agent game for zero-shot relation triplet extraction,

    T. Xu, H. Yang, F. Zhao, Z. Wu, and X. Dai, “A two-agent game for zero-shot relation triplet extraction,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024, 28 Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting, August 11-16, 2024, L. Ku, A. Martins, and V . Srikumar, E...

    2024 doi

  252. [274]

    Social learning through interactions with other agents: A survey,

    D. Hillier, C. Tan, and J. Jiang, “Social learning through interactions with other agents: A survey,” inProceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2024, Jeju, South Korea, August 3-9, 2024. ijcai.org, 2024, pp. 8067–8076. [...

    2024

  253. [275]

    AVIS: autonomous visual information seeking with large language model agent,

    Z. Huet al., “AVIS: autonomous visual information seeking with large language model agent,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023, NeurIPS 2023, New Orleans, LA, USA, December 10 - 16, 2023, A. O...

    2023

  254. [276]

    Travelplanner: A benchmark for real-world planning with language agents,

    J. Xieet al., “Travelplanner: A benchmark for real-world planning with language agents,” inForty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. OpenReview.net, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=l5XQzNkAOe

    2024

  255. [277]

    Trial and error: Exploration-based trajectory optimization of LLM agents,

    Y. Song, D. Yin, X. Yue, J. Huang, S. Li, and B. Y. Lin, “Trial and error: Exploration-based trajectory optimization of LLM agents,” inProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand, ...

    2024 doi

  256. [278]

    Automanual: Constructing instruction manuals by LLM agents via interactive environmental learning,

    M. Chen, Y. Li, Y. Yang, S. Yu, B. Lin, and X. He, “Automanual: Constructing instruction manuals by LLM agents via interactive environmental learning,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, Neur...

    2024

  257. [279]

    Grounded decoding: Guiding text generation with grounded models for embodied agents,

    W. Huanget al., “Grounded decoding: Guiding text generation with grounded models for embodied agents,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023, NeurIPS 2023, New Orleans, LA, USA, December 10 - 16,...

    2023

  258. [280]

    Online continual learning for interactive instruction following agents,

    B. Kim, M. Seo, and J. Choi, “Online continual learning for interactive instruction following agents,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024. OpenReview.net, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://openreview....

    2024

  259. [281]

    Language agents with reinforcement learning for strategic play in the werewolf game,

    Z. Xu, C. Yu, F. Fang, Y. Wang, and Y. Wu, “Language agents with reinforcement learning for strategic play in the werewolf game,” in Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. OpenReview.net, 2024. [Online]. Availabl...

    2024

  260. [282]

    Omnijarvis: Unified vision-language-action tokenization enables open-world instruction following agents,

    Z. Wanget al., “Omnijarvis: Unified vision-language-action tokenization enables open-world instruction following agents,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canad...

    2024

  261. [283]

    Distilling internet-scale vision-language models into embodied agents,

    T. R. Sumers, K. Marino, A. Ahuja, R. Fergus, and I. Dasgupta, “Distilling internet-scale vision-language models into embodied agents,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2023, 23-29 July 2023, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Resea...

    2023

  262. [284]

    Embodied agent interface: Benchmarking llms for embodied decision making,

    M. Liet al., “Embodied agent interface: Benchmarking llms for embodied decision making,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December 10 - 15, 2024, A. Glo...

    2024

  263. [285]

    Robotouille: An asynchronous planning benchmark for LLM agents,

    G. Gonzalez-Pumariega, L. S. Yean, N. Sunkara, and S. Choudhury, “Robotouille: An asynchronous planning benchmark for LLM agents,” inThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, Singapore, April 24-28, 2025. OpenReview.net, 2025. [Online]. Av...

    2025

  264. [286]

    Swiftsage: A generative agent with fast and slow thinking for complex interactive tasks,

    B. Y. Linet al., “Swiftsage: A generative agent with fast and slow thinking for complex interactive tasks,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023, NeurIPS 2023, New Orleans, LA, USA, December 10 ...

    2023

  265. [287]

    On the effects of data scale on UI control agents,

    W. Liet al., “On the effects of data scale on UI control agents,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December 10 - 15, 2024, A. Globersonset al., Eds., 20...

    2024

  266. [288]

    Understanding the weakness of large language model agents within a complex android environment,

    M. Xing, R. Zhang, H. Xue, Q. Chen, F. Yang, and Z. Xiao, “Understanding the weakness of large language model agents within a complex android environment,” inProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2024, Barcelona, Spain, Augus...

    2024

  267. [289]

    Division-of-thoughts: Harnessing hybrid language model synergy for efficient on-device agents,

    C. Shao, X. Hu, Y. Lin, and F. Xu, “Division-of-thoughts: Harnessing hybrid language model synergy for efficient on-device agents,” inProceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, WWW 2025, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 28 April 2025- 2 May 2025, G. Long, M. Blumestein, Y. Chang, L...

    2025

  268. [290]

    Tool learning in the wild: Empowering language models as automatic tool agents,

    Z. Shiet al., “Tool learning in the wild: Empowering language models as automatic tool agents,” inProceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, WWW 2025, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 28 April 2025- 2 May 2025, G. Long, M. Blumestein, Y. Chang, L. Lewin-Eytan, Z. H. Huang, and E. Y...

    2025

  269. [291]

    Tailoring with targeted precision: Edit-based agents for open-domain procedure customization,

    Y. K. Lal, L. Zhang, F. Brahman, B. P . Majumder, P . Clark, and N. Tandon, “Tailoring with targeted precision: Edit-based agents for open-domain procedure customization,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meet...

    2024 doi

  270. [292]

    Worldcoder, a model-based LLM agent: Building world models by writing code and interacting with the environment,

    H. Tang, D. Key, and K. Ellis, “Worldcoder, a model-based LLM agent: Building world models by writing code and interacting with the environment,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 20...

    2024

  271. [293]

    Rada: Retrieval-augmented web agent planning with llms,

    M. Kim, V . S. Bursztyn, E. Koh, S. Guo, and S. Hwang, “Rada: Retrieval-augmented web agent planning with llms,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting, August 11-16, 2024, L. Ku, A. Martins, and V . Srikum...

    2024 doi

  272. [294]

    An llm-enhanced agent-based simulation tool for information propagation,

    Y. Huet al., “An llm-enhanced agent-based simulation tool for information propagation,” inProceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2024, Jeju, South Korea, August 3-9, 2024. ijcai.org, 2024, pp. 8679–8682. [Online]. Avail...

    2024

  273. [295]

    Mapcoder: Multi-agent code generation for competitive problem solving,

    M. A. Islam, M. E. Ali, and M. R. Parvez, “Mapcoder: Multi-agent code generation for competitive problem solving,” inProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), ACL 2024, 29 Bangkok, Thailand, August 11-16, 2...

    2024 doi

  274. [298]

    undler, M. N. M ¨

    N. M ¨"undler, M. N. M ¨"uller, J. He, and M. T. Vechev, “Swt-bench: Testing and validating real-world bug-fixes with code agents,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver,...

    2024

  275. [300]

    Can large language model agents simulate human trust behavior?

    C. Xieet al., “Can large language model agents simulate human trust behavior?” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December 10 - 15, 2024, A. Globersonset ...

    2024

  276. [2023]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303. 08774

    doi

  277. [2025]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504. 00587

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.