Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 176 references

Spontaneous emission and Purcell effect: some aspects

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review chapter sets out to establish that spontaneous emission is not a fixed atomic property: the surrounding electromagnetic environment changes the decay rate, and engineered media can suppress it, enhance it by orders of…

desk verdict A competent review chapter with no new science; Eq. (7.19) is dimensionally wrong and the percolation enhancement rests on a shaky local effective-medium premise. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.10210 v1 pith:SXO6VCHT submitted 2025-06-11 cond-mat.mes-hall physics.optics

P. P. Abrantes , D. Szilard , C. Farina This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics
keywords spontaneousemissionPurcelleffectlocaldensityofstatesGreen'sfunctiongoldenruleeffectivemediumtheorypercolationthresholdphosphorenestrain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review chapter's central claim is that spontaneous emission is not an intrinsic property of a quantum emitter but a joint property of the emitter and its electromagnetic surroundings. The authors derive the decay rate from the golden rule of perturbation theory using field modes that satisfy the boundary conditions imposed by nearby bodies, which makes the role of the environment visible: plates, cavities, composite media, phase-change materials, and strained two-dimensional crystals all reshape the local density of states and thereby the decay rate. The practical stakes are that the same environment which can silence an emitter between two plates can amplify its rate by five to six orders of magnitude near a percolating metal–dielectric composite, imprints thermal hysteresis across a material phase transition, and lets mechanical strain toggle emission on and off. In this way the chapter connects a foundational quantum-vacuum phenomenon to nano-optics and quantum technology.

What carries the argument

Two equivalent expressions carry the argument. The first is the golden rule of time-dependent perturbation theory, Eq. (7.5): $\Gamma(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{\pi\omega_0}{\epsilon_0\hbar}\sum_{\zeta} |\mathbf{d}\cdot\mathbf{A}_\zeta(\mathbf{r})|^2 \delta(\omega_\zeta-\omega_0)$, where the $\mathbf{A}_\zeta$ are orthonormal solutions of the Helmholtz equation satisfying the boundary conditions; this makes the environment dependence visible through the modes. The second is the dyadic Green's function identity, Eq. (7.14): $\Gamma(\mathbf{r})/\Gamma^{(0)} = \frac{6\pi c}{\omega_0}\,\mathrm{Im}\{\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{G}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r};\omega_0)\cdot\mathbf{n}\}$, which turns the problem into the imaginary part of the scattered field at the emitter's position, with planar interfaces described by Fresnel reflection coefficients. For composite and phase-change media, effective-medium averaging supplies the local dielectric constant that enters those coefficients, and the quasi-static limit produces the near-field scaling $\Gamma_\perp/\Gamma^{(0)} \simeq 2\Gamma_\parallel/\Gamma^{(0)} \simeq \frac{3}{4 z^3}\,\frac{\mathrm{Im}[\varepsilon_e]}{|\varepsilon_e+1|^2}$.

What would settle it

Measure the decay rate of a cesium emitter held about 100 nm above a gold-in-dielectric composite while sweeping the metal filling fraction through the percolation value 1/3; the chapter predicts a five-to-six-order-of-magnitude enhancement peaking at that fraction, so observing a smaller, shifted, or suppressed peak would show the local effective-medium description is inadequate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Stated explicitly in Section 7.3.1, the central claim is that 'the SE rate of a quantum emitter is not an intrinsic property, but rather depends on the surrounding atomic environment.' The chapter demonstrates this first with exact mode-sum expressions for an atom near one or two perfectly conducting plates, where the decay rate oscillates with distance and a parallel dipole is completely suppressed when the plate separation is below half the transition wavelength. It then extends the claim to engineered media: a plasmonic shell can cancel the Purcell effect so the emitter decays at its free-space rate regardless of distance; a metal–dielectric composite at the percolation threshold enhances the near-field decay rate by five to six orders of magnitude; a VO2 film gives the decay rate a thermal hysteresis across its metal–insulator transition; and uniaxial strain in phosphorene can enhance the electric Purcell effect by up to 1300% or nearly suppress it while shifting the dominant decay channel among propagating, total-internal-reflection, and lossy-surface-wave modes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a metal–dielectric mixture near its percolation threshold, and a VO2 film during its phase transition, can be treated as homogeneous materials with a single local dielectric constant determined by effective-medium averaging; if that premise fails at nanoscale emitter–surface distances, the predicted enhancements, peaks, and hysteresis in the decay rate would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Between two parallel conducting plates separated by less than half the transition wavelength, an emitter whose dipole is parallel to the plates stops emitting entirely, while a perpendicular dipole keeps decaying; the chapter notes this was observed with Rydberg atoms.
  • A plasmonic shell around a dielectric sphere can make the sphere invisible to the emitter in the dipole approximation, so the decay rate returns to its free-space value at every emitter–sphere distance.
  • Near a metal–dielectric composite at the percolation threshold, the decay rate of a cesium atom at about 100 nm is enhanced by five to six orders of magnitude, with the maximum at the metal filling fraction $f_c = 1/3$.
  • Across the VO2 metal–insulator transition, the decay rate follows the material's thermal hysteresis, with peaks up to about $10^3$ times the free-space value for emitters with $\lambda_0 \lesssim 10\,\mu$m.
  • Uniaxial strain in phosphorene can increase the electric Purcell effect by 1300% or nearly suppress it, and it changes which decay channel—propagating, total internal reflection, or lossy surface wave—dominates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the same Green's function identity also governs resonance energy transfer, radiative heat transfer, and two-photon emission, the percolation, phase-change, and strain controls described here plausibly transfer to those phenomena; the chapter only names that wider family in its closing remarks.
  • The percolation prediction rests on a local effective permittivity, so an emitter placed well below 100 nm from the composite, or extremely close to the critical filling fraction, would be a natural place to look for nonlocal corrections that move or broaden the predicted peak.
  • The strain-based switching in phosphorene offers a mechanical, hysteresis-free route to on-demand control of single-photon emission that avoids the Zeeman shifts of magneto-optical schemes mentioned in the chapter.
  • The cloaking result suggests that a single emitter's decay rate can serve as a quantum-local probe of invisibility, complementing far-field scattering-cross-section measurements in the dipole regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This chapter provides a pedagogical review of spontaneous emission (SE) and the Purcell effect, ranging from a historical survey of QED vacuum effects to a derivation of the SE rate via Fermi's golden rule and mode expansion for free space, a single perfectly conducting plate, and two parallel plates. It then presents several advanced scenarios: plasmonic cloaking, composite media near the percolation threshold, VO2 phase transitions, and strained phosphorene. The central claim is that the SE rate of a quantum emitter is not an intrinsic atomic property but depends on the surrounding electromagnetic environment, supported by textbook derivations and the cited experiments of Drexhage and Hulet.

Significance. As a review chapter, the manuscript succeeds in presenting a coherent and readable overview, and the standard derivations of the free-space and plate results are correct and consistent with the literature. Its strengths include the transparent citation of the original peer-reviewed papers for the advanced sections, the explicit connection to landmark experiments, and the clear historical narrative. The advanced sections report potentially large effects (orders-of-magnitude enhancement, suppression, and switching of SE), which would be significant for quantum technology if they hold up experimentally. However, the quantitative claims in the percolation section (Section 7.4.2) rely on an effective-medium assumption that the chapter itself undercuts near the critical point, and one of the analytic expressions in that section contains a dimensional error.

major comments (2)
  1. [7.4.2, Eq. (7.19)] Equation (7.19) is dimensionally inconsistent: the right-hand side, (3/4) z^{-3} Im[\epsilon_e]/|\epsilon_e+1|^2, has units of inverse cubic length, whereas the left-hand side \Gamma_\perp/\Gamma(0) is dimensionless. The quasi-static limit of Eqs. (7.16) and (7.17) must contain a factor k_0^{-3}, i.e., an expression of the form (3/4)(k_0 z)^{-3} Im[\epsilon_e]/|\epsilon_e+1|^2. As written, the equation cannot be correct, and since it is presented as the analytic explanation for the five-to-six-orders-of-magnitude enhancement at the percolation threshold, it needs to be fixed and the surrounding discussion adjusted accordingly.
  2. [7.4.2] The quantitative predictions at z ~ 100 nm near the percolation threshold use a local Bruggeman effective permittivity in the Fresnel coefficients of Eq. (7.18). This is in tension with the chapter's own statements that near percolation the field fluctuations become scale-invariant and highly localized, because homogenization is only valid at scales much larger than the inhomogeneities. The authors should either provide evidence (e.g., from nonlocal or full-wave calculations) that the local effective-medium description remains accurate at these distances and filling fractions, or explicitly state this limitation and qualify the claimed enhancement.
minor comments (4)
  1. [7.3.2, Eq. (7.2)] Equation (7.2) for the free-space SE rate is dimensionally inconsistent in SI units; the standard result is \Gamma(0) = |d|^2 \omega_0^3 / (3 \pi \epsilon_0 \hbar c^3). Please specify the unit system (e.g., Gaussian with c = 1) or insert the missing factors so that the equation is consistent with the SI expressions used elsewhere in the chapter.
  2. [References [51]] Reference [51] gives an incorrect title for Lifshitz's 1956 paper; the actual title is "The theory of molecular attractive forces between solids" (Sov. Phys. JETP 2, 73 (1956)). The current title appears to be from a much later, unrelated paper.
  3. [Eqs. (7.16)-(7.17) and (7.20)-(7.25)] The square roots are typeset as 'q' in Eqs. (7.16) and (7.17), and the integrals in Eqs. (7.20)-(7.25) appear as 'Z d2k\|' instead of \int d^2k_\parallel; these typographical issues should be corrected.
  4. [7.4.2] The statement that the SE rate 'scales as 1/Im[\epsilon_e]' for a metallic medium is imprecise: the dimensionless combination is Im[\epsilon_e]/|\epsilon_e+1|^2, which for a good metal behaves as Im[\epsilon_e]/|\epsilon_e|^2, not as 1/Im[\epsilon_e]. Please rephrase for accuracy.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the environment-dependence of spontaneous emission is derived from boundary-condition-dependent modes and benchmarked against independent experiments; advanced sections are transparent reviews of prior peer-reviewed work.

full rationale

The chapter's central claim is not circular. Equation (7.5), Γ(r) = (πω0/ε0ℏ) Σ|d·Aζ(r)|²δ(ωζ−ω0), is presented as a Fermi-golden-rule consequence in which the field modes Aζ(r) are constrained by boundary conditions; the conclusion that the SE rate depends on the surrounding environment follows from the equations rather than being assumed. The canonical plate and cavity results (Eqs. 7.9–7.12) are checked against the Drexhage and Hulet experiments independently. Sections 7.4.1–7.4.4 summarize the authors' own prior peer-reviewed papers (Refs. 101, 109, 114, 126) transparently, and those underlying results are externally falsifiable parameter-free calculations (BEMT, Fresnel coefficients, optical conductivity), not fits to the SE data being 'predicted'. The substantive weaknesses are physical-correctness concerns, not circularity: Eq. (7.19) is dimensionally inconsistent because a factor of k0³ is missing, and Section 7.4.2 itself notes the highly localized, subwavelength-confined resonant plasmon fluctuations near percolation, which undercut the local-homogenization premise at nanoscale emitter–surface separations. These issues affect confidence in quantitative enhancement claims but do not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted in this chapter; the standard derivations use textbook results, and the advanced scenarios borrow parameters (filling fraction, Fermi energy, strain) from the cited papers. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Fermi's golden rule and the Markovian approximation govern the decay dynamics of the two-level emitter.
    Used in Section 7.3.1 to obtain Eq. (7.5) from the interaction Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption The emitter is treated as a two-level system with a nonvanishing electric dipole transition; spontaneous emission proceeds via one-photon electric dipole transitions.
    Stated in Section 7.3.1; two-photon and magnetic-dipole processes are excluded from the general formulas.
  • standard math Electromagnetic modes form a complete orthonormal set satisfying the Helmholtz equation and the boundary conditions imposed by surrounding bodies.
    Needed for the mode-sum expression Eq. (7.5) and its application to conducting plates.
  • domain assumption Composite media are described by a local, scalar effective permittivity derived from Bruggeman effective medium theory.
    Adopted in Sections 7.4.2 and 7.4.3; used in the Fresnel coefficients, Eq. (7.18), and in the quasi-static near-field expression Eq. (7.19).
  • domain assumption Boundaries such as perfectly conducting plates impose E_parallel = 0.
    Used in Sections 7.3.3 and 7.3.4 to construct the field modes Eqs. (7.7) and (7.8).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spontaneous emission and Purcell effect: some aspects." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SXO6VCHT

@misc{pith2026250610210,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spontaneous emission and Purcell effect: some aspects},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SXO6VCHT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.10210}
}
read the original abstract

This chapter, part of the Proceedings of the III International Workshop on Quantum Nonstationary Systems (eds. Alexandre Dodonov and Lucas Chibebe Celeri), held in Brasilia in August 2024, offers a comprehensive overview of spontaneous emission (SE) and the Purcell effect within the broader context of quantum electrodynamics (QED) and vacuum fluctuations. It begins with a historical and theoretical review, tracing the development of classical and quantum electromagnetic theories. The chapter then examines how the SE rate of a quantum emitter is fundamentally influenced by its electromagnetic environment, the so-called Purcell effect, through canonical examples, such as emitters near perfectly conducting plates and inside cavities, as well as more advanced scenarios. Special attention is given to modern strategies for tailoring SE using engineered environments, including plasmonic cloaks, composite media near percolation thresholds, metal-insulator phase transitions, and strain-induced modulation in phosphorene. Analytical techniques, such as mode summation and Green's function formalism, are employed to describe how surrounding materials and boundary conditions affect local field modes and the local density of states. The findings underscore both the theoretical depth and experimental relevance of SE modulation, paving the way for innovations in nano-optics, quantum technologies, and advanced material design.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.10210 by the authors.

Figure 7
Figure 7. shows Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7.1
Figure 7.1. SE rates Γ⊥/Γ (0), Γ∥/Γ (0), and Γiso/Γ (0) as functions of k0z. Insets (a) and (b) illustrate the classical analogues of a quantum emitter with the transition dipole moment per￾pendicular or parallel to the perfectly conducting plane. with transverse magnetic modes. This effect on atomic lifetime was experimentally veri￾fied by Drexhage, Kuhn, and Sh¨afer [93, 94]. 7.3.4 Atom near two parallel and infinite conducti… view at source ↗
Figure 7.2
Figure 7.2. SE rates Γ⊥/Γ (0) and Γ∥/Γ (0) as functions of 2L/λ0 with the atom placed at z = L/2. 7.4 Purcell effect in some non-trivial situations Over the past decades, advances in nano-optics, plasmonics, and metamaterials have led to significant progress in controlling SE. Researchers have employed intricate nanostruc￾tures, such as optical cavities, photonic crystals, metallic nanostructures, and plasmonic devices, to mani… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 7.3
Figure 7.3. Figure 7.3: (a) Dielectric sphere of radius a1, permittivity ε1, and permeability µ1 covered by a spherical shell of inner radius a1 and outer radius a2, permittivity ε2, and permeability µ2. (b) Schematic diagram representing the cancellation of the core sphere and outer shell …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) illustrates this situation. The green line shows the case where the spher [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 7.4
Figure 7.4. Figure 7.4: (a) |c TM 1 | as a function of a2/a1. (b) Relative SE rate ∆Γ(r)/Γ (0) as a function of a2/a1 for the atom-sphere distance k0r0 = 10. (c) ∆Γ(r)/Γ (0) as a function of both a2/a1 and k0r, with ε2 = 0.5ε0. In all plots, a1 = λ0/10 and ε1 = 10ε0. Adapted from Ref. [101]…
Figure 7.5
Figure 7.5. Figure 7.5: Quantum emitter close to a composite medium, formed by randomly distributed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: computes the SE rate as a function of the distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 7.6
Figure 7.6. Figure 7.6: Normalized SE rate Γ∥/Γ (0) as a function of (a) z for different filling fractions f and (b) f for different distances z. In both cases, the composite medium consists of gold spherical inclusions. Adapted from Ref. [109]. to BEMT for spherical inclusions, the composi…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: also illustrates how the transition from far-field to near-field effects depends [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 7.7
Figure 7.7. Figure 7.7: (a) System under study. (b) Dielectric constant of VO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7_7.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows how the SE rates vary with distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]
Figure 7.8
Figure 7.8. Figure 7.8: Quantum emitter close to a phosphorene/SiC medium, subjected to uniaxial strain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7_8.png]
Figure 7.9
Figure 7.9. Figure 7.9: SE rates as functions of the distance d, considering uniaxial strain ϵy with differ￾ent intensities, and transition wavelengths (a)-(c) 4.1 µm, and (d)-(f) 10 µm. Adapted from Ref. [126]. (ϵy = 0%). However, when strain is applied, the SE rates may be substantially m…
Figure 7.10
Figure 7.10. Figure 7.10: Percentage variation in the electric SE rates as functions of (a)-(b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7_10.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the decay channel probabilities for both values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png]
Figure 7.11
Figure 7.11. Figure 7.11: Decay channels probabilities as functions of (a)-(b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

176 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. C. Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism (Clarendon press, Oxford, 1873)

  2. [2]

    − Γν(ϵy = 0)]/Γν(ϵy = 0), where ν = {x, y, z} and Γ ν(ϵy ̸= 0) [Γ ν(ϵy = 0)] stands for the SE rate near strained (relaxed) phosphorene. In Fig. 7.10, we exhibit the percentage variation in SE rates for both values of λ0. Figures 7.10(a) and (b) show these variations as functions of d, while Figs. 7.10(c) and (d) are calculations as functions of ϵy. In Fi...

    2022

  3. [3]

    E. T. Whittaker, A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity (Oxford City Press, Oxford, 1951)

    1951

  4. [4]

    Einstein

    A. Einstein. On the electrodynamics of moving bodies. Ann. Phys. 17, 891 (1905)

    1905

  5. [5]

    H. A. Bethe. The electromagnetic shift of energy levels. Phys. Rev. 72, 241 (1947)

    1947

  6. [6]

    P. A. M. Dirac. The quantum theory of emission and absorption of radiation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 114, 243 (1927)

    1927

  7. [7]

    P. W. Milonni, The Quantum Vacuum: An Introduction to Quantum Electrodynam- ics (Academic press, 1994)

    1994

  8. [8]

    W. E. Lamb Jr. and R. C. Retherford. Fine structure of the hydrogen atom by a microwave method. Phys. Rev. 72, 241 (1947)

    1947

Show all 176 references
  1. [9]

    Beringer et al

    J. Beringer et al. Review of particle physics. Phys. Rev. D, 86, 010001 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Schwinger

    J. Schwinger. On quantum-electrodynamics and the magnetic moment of the electron. Phys. Rev. 73, 416 (1948)

    1948

  3. [11]

    H. M. Foley and P. Kusch. On the intrinsic moment of the electron. Phys. Rev. 73, 412 (1948)

    1948

  4. [12]

    Kusch and H

    P. Kusch and H. M. Foley. Precision measurement of the ratio of the atomic ‘g values’ in the 2P 3 2 and 2P 1 2 states of gallium. Phys. Rev. 72, 1256 (1947)

    1947

  5. [13]

    S. M. C. Atara. An introduction to some QED vacuum effects. Master thesis, Uni- versidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Barn´ othy

    J. Barn´ othy. On the Intrinsic Moment of the Electron. Phys. Rev. 74, 250 (1948)

    1948

  7. [15]

    F. J. Dyson. The radiation theories of Tomonaga, Schwinger, and Feynman. Phys. Rev. 75, 486 (1949)

    1949

  8. [16]

    S. S. Schweber, QED and the Men who Made it: Dyson, Feynman, Schwinger and Tomonaga (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994)

    1994

  9. [17]

    H. Euler. ¨Uber die streuung von Licht an Licht nach der diracschen theorie. Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 26, 398 (1936)

    1936

  10. [18]

    Euler and B

    H. Euler and B. Kockel. ¨Uber die streuung von Licht an Licht nach der diracschen theorie. Naturwiss. 23, 246 (1935)

    1935

  11. [19]

    Dittrich and M

    W. Dittrich and M. Reuter, Effective Lagrangians in quantum electrodynamics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1985)

    1985

  12. [20]

    Heisenberg and H

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler. Folgerungen aus der Diracschen Theorie des Positrons. Z. Phys. 98, 714 (1936)

    1936

  13. [21]

    Jarlskog, et al

    G. Jarlskog, et al. Measurement of Delbruck scattering and observation of photon splitting at high energies. Phys. Rev. D 8, 3813 (1973)

    1973

  14. [22]

    Meitner and H

    L. Meitner and H. K¨ osters. ¨Uber die Streuung kurzwelliger γ-Strahlen. Z. Phys. 84, 137 (1933) (with a comment of M. Delbr¨ uck)

    1933

  15. [23]

    Rullhusen et al

    P. Rullhusen et al. Test of vacuum polarization by precise investigation of Delbruck scattering. Phys. Rev. C 23, 1375 (1981)

    1981

  16. [24]

    Muckenheim and M

    W. Muckenheim and M. Schumacher. Delbruck and Rayleigh scattering by uranium investigated at photon energies between 0.1 and 1.5 MeV. J. Phys. G 6, 1237 (1980)

    1980

  17. [25]

    Evidence for light-by-light scattering in heavy-ion collisions 22 P

    ATLAS Collaboration. Evidence for light-by-light scattering in heavy-ion collisions 22 P. P. Abrantes, D. Szilard, and C. Farina with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Nat. Phys. 13, 852 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Dittrich

    W. Dittrich. The Heisenberg Euler Lagrangian as an example of an effective field theory. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1430052 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    E. A. Uehling. Polarization effects in the positron theory. Phys. Rev. 48, 55 (1935)

    1935

  20. [28]

    J. Furtado. Sobre a a¸ c˜ ao de Euler-Heisenberg e o espalhamento da luz pela luz. Rev. Bras. Ens. Fis. 41, e20180253 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Peskin and D

    M. Peskin and D. Schroeder, Introduction to quantum field theory (CRC Press, 2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Greiner and J

    W. Greiner and J. Reinhart, Quantum Electrodynamics (Springer Verlag, 2010)

    2010

  23. [31]

    Medeiros, F

    M. Medeiros, F. E. Barone and F. A. Barone. Effects of the fermionic vacuum polar- ization in QED. Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 1 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    A. E. Frolov and D. M. Wardlaw. Analytical formula for the Uehling potential. Eur. Phys. J. B 85, 348 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Weisskopf

    V. Weisskopf. ¨Uber die Elektrodynamik des Vakuums auf Grund der Quantentheorie des Elektrons. Dan. Mat. Fys. Medd. 24, 3 (1936)

    1936

  26. [34]

    F. Sauter. ¨Uber das Verhalten eines Elektrons im homogenen elektrischen Feld nach der relativistischen Theorie Diracs. Z. Phys. 69, 742 (1931)

    1931

  27. [35]

    Greiner, B

    W. Greiner, B. M¨ uller and J. Rafelski, Quantum Electrodynamics of Strong Fields (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1985)

    1985

  28. [36]

    Schwinger

    J. Schwinger. On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization. Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951)

    1951

  29. [37]

    G. V. Dunne, Heisenberg-Euler effective Lagrangians: Basics and extensions, in From Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics. Ian Kogan Memorial Col- lection (3 volume set). edited by M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, and J. Wheater (World Scientific Pub. Co, 2005), pp...

    2005

  30. [38]

    F. C. Salgado el al. Towards pair production in the non-perturbative regime. New J. Phys. 23, 105002 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    H. B. G. Casimir. On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates. Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. 51, 793 (1948)

    1948

  32. [40]

    Holstein

    B. Holstein. Strong field pair production. Am. J. Phys. 67, 499 (1999)

    1999

  33. [41]

    F. London. Zur Theorie und Systematik der Molekularkr¨ afte. Z. Phys.63, 245 (1930)

    1930

  34. [42]

    Eisenschitz and F

    R. Eisenschitz and F. London. ¨Uber das Verhaltnis der van der Waalsschen Krafte zu den homopolaren Bindungskraften. Z. Phys. 60, 491 (1930)

    1930

  35. [43]

    H. B. G. Casimir and D. Polder. Influence of retardation in the London-van der Waals force. Nature 158, 787 (1946)

    1946

  36. [44]

    E. J. W. Verwey and J. Th. G. Overbeek, Theory of the Stability of Lyophobic Colloids (Dover Publications, 1999)

    1999

  37. [45]

    J. A. Wheeler. The scattering of alpha-particles in helium. Phys. Rev. 59, 16 (1941)

    1941

  38. [46]

    H. B. G. Casimir and D. Polder. The influence of retardation on the London-van der Waals forces. Phys. Rev. 73, 360 (1948)

    1948

  39. [47]

    M. J. Sparnaay. Measurements of attractive forces between flat plates. Physica 24, 751 (1958)

    1958

  40. [48]

    H. B. G. Casimir. Sur les forces Van der Waals-London. J. Chim. Phys. 46, 407 (1946)

    1946

  41. [49]

    Mohideen and A

    U. Mohideen and A. Roy. Precision measurement of the Casimir force from 0 .1 to 0.9 µm. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4549 (1998)

    1998

  42. [50]

    Lamoreaux

    S. Lamoreaux. Demonstration of the Casimir force in the 0 .6 to 6 µm range. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5 (1997)

    1997

  43. [51]

    E. M. Lifshitz. Probing atom-surface interactions by diffraction of Bose-Einstein condensates. Sov. Phys. JETP 2, 73 (1956)

    1956

  44. [52]

    Bimonte et al

    G. Bimonte et al. Measurement of the Casimir force between 0 .2 and 8 µm: experi- Spontaneous emission and Purcell effect: some aspects 23 mental procedures and comparison with theory. Universe 7, 93 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Reuter and W

    M. Reuter and W. Dittrich. Regularization schemes for the Casimir effect. Eur. J. Phys. 6, 33 (1985)

    1985

  46. [54]

    I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii. The general theory of van der Waals forces. Adv. Phys. 10, 165 (1961)

    1961

  47. [55]

    P. W. Milonni and M.-L. Shih. Casimir forces. Contemp. Phys. 33, 313 (1992)

    1992

  48. [56]

    Elizalde and A

    E. Elizalde and A. Romeo. Essentials of the Casimir effect and its computation. Am. J. Phys. 59, 711 (1991)

    1991

  49. [57]

    K. A. Milton, The Casimir Effect: Physical Manifestation of Zero-Point Energy (World Scientific, 2001)

    2001

  50. [58]

    C. Farina. The Casimir effect: some aspects. Braz. J. Phys. 36, 1137 (2006)

    2006

  51. [59]

    S. Y. Buhmann, Dispersion forces (Springer, 2013)

    2013

  52. [60]

    Bordag, G

    M. Bordag, G. I. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen and V. M. Mostepanenko, Advances in the Casimir Effect (Oxford University Press, 2009)

    2009

  53. [61]

    Schwinger

    J. Schwinger. Casimir light: a glimpse. PNAS 90, 958 (1993)

    1993

  54. [62]

    Yablonovitch

    E. Yablonovitch. Accelerating reference frame for electromagnetic waves in a rapidly growing plasma: Unruh-Davies-Fulling-DeWitt radiation and the nonadiabatic Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1742 (1989)

    1989

  55. [63]

    D. M. Tibaduiza. On the quantum harmonic oscillator with variable frequency and the dynamical Casimir effect with time-dependent Robin boundary condition. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (2019)

    2019

  56. [64]

    D. M. Tibaduiza, L. Pires, D. Szilard, C. A. D. Zarro, C. Farina and A. L. C. Rego. A time-dependent harmonic oscillator with two frequency jumps: an exact algebraic solution. Braz. J. Phys. 50, 634 (2020)

    2020

  57. [65]

    S. A. Fulling and P. C. W. Davies. Radiation from a moving mirror in two dimensional space-time: conformal anomaly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 348, 393 (1976)

    1976

  58. [66]

    G. T. Moore. Quantum theory of the electromagnetic field in a variable-length one- dimensional cavity. J. Math. Phys. 11, 2679 (1970)

    1970

  59. [67]

    P. A. Maia Neto. Vacuum radiation pressure on moving mirrors. J. Phys. A 27, 2167 (1994)

    1994

  60. [68]

    L. H. Ford and A. Vilenkin. Quantum radiation by moving mirrors. Phys. Rev. D 25, 2569 (1982)

    1982

  61. [69]

    D. F. Mundarain and P. A. Maia Neto. Quantum radiation in a plane cavity with moving mirrors. Phys. Rev. A 57, 1379 (1998)

    1998

  62. [70]

    P. A. Maia Neto and L. A. S. Machado. Quantum radiation generated by a moving mirror in free space. Phys. Rev. A 54, 3420 (1996)

    1996

  63. [71]

    Mintz, C

    B. Mintz, C. Farina, P. A. Maia Neto and R. B. Rodrigues. Casimir forces for moving boundaries with Robin conditions. J. Phys. A 39, 6559 (2006)

    2006

  64. [72]

    Mintz, C

    B. Mintz, C. Farina, P. A. Maia Neto and R. B. Rodrigues. Particle creation by a moving boundary with a Robin boundary condition. J. Phys. A 39, 11325 (2006)

    2006

  65. [73]

    H. O. Silva and C. Farina. Simple model for the dynamical Casimir effect for a static mirror with time-dependent properties. Phys. Rev. D 84, 045003 (2011)

    2011

  66. [74]

    C. M. Wilson et al. Observation of the dynamical Casimir effect in a superconducting circuit. Nature 479, 376 (2011)

    2011

  67. [75]

    R. M. Souza, F. Impens and P. A. M. Neto. Microscopic dynamical Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. A 97, 032514 (2017)

    2017

  68. [76]

    J. R. Johansson, G. Johansson, C. M. Wilson and F. Nori. Dynamical Casimir effect 24 P. P. Abrantes, D. Szilard, and C. Farina in a superconducting coplanar waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 147003 (2009)

    2009

  69. [77]

    C. D. Fosco, F. C. Lombardo and F. D. Mazzitelli. Motion-induced radiation due to an atom in the presence of a graphene plane. Universe 7, 158 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    M. B. Far ´ ıas, C. D. Fosco, F. C. Lombardo and F. D. Mazzitelli. Motion induced radiation and quantum friction for a moving atom. Phys. Rev. D100, 036013 (2019)

    2019

  71. [79]

    J. D. L. Silva, A. N. Braga, A. L. C. Rego and D. T. Alves. Motion induced by asymmetric excitation of the quantum vacuum. Phys. Rev. D 102, 125019 (2020)

    2020

  72. [80]

    J. D. L. Silva, A. N. Braga and D. T. Alves. Dynamical Casimir effect with δ − δ′ mirrors. Phys. Rev. D 94, 105009 (2016)

    2016

  73. [81]

    D. A. R. Dalvit and W. J. M. Kort-Kamp. Shaping dynamical Casimir photons. Universe 7, 189 (2021)

    2021

  74. [82]

    A. L. C. Rego, A. N. Braga, J. D. L. Silva and D. T. Alves. Dynamical Casimir effect enhanced by decreasing the mirror reflectivity. Phys. Rev. D 105, 025013 (2022)

    2022

  75. [83]

    V. Dodonov. Fifty years of the dynamical Casimir effect. Physics 2, 67 (2020)

    2020

  76. [84]

    Dalvit, P

    D. Dalvit, P. W. Milonni, D. Roberts and F. S. S. Rosa, Casimir physics (Springer, 2011)

    2011

  77. [85]

    G. N. Lewis. The conservation of photons. Nature 118, 874 (1926)

    1926

  78. [86]

    Einstein

    A. Einstein. Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung. Phys. Z. 18, 121 (1917). English translation: The Quantum Theory of Radiation, in D. T. Haar, The Old Quantum Theory (Pergamon Press, 1967)

    1917

  79. [87]

    M. Planck. On an improvement of Wien’s equation for the spectrum. Verh. Deut. Phys. Ges. 2, 202 (1900)

    1900

  80. [88]

    Kleppner

    D. Kleppner. Rereading Einstein on radiation. Phys. Today 58, 30 (2005)

    2005

  81. [89]

    Y. Muniz. Quantum light-matter interactions in low-dimensional materials. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (2021)

    2021

  82. [90]

    E. M. Purcell. Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies. Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946)

    1946

  83. [91]

    Goppert-Mayer

    M. Goppert-Mayer. ¨Uber Elementarakte mit zwei Quantenspr¨ ungen. Ann. Phys.401, 273 (1931)

    1931

  84. [92]

    D. Szilard. Spontaneous emission in the presence of phase transitions. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (2017)

    2017

  85. [93]

    K. H. Drexhage. Beeinflussung der Fluoreszenz eins Europiumchelates durch einen Spiegel. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 70, 1179 (1966)

    1966

  86. [94]

    Weisskopf and E

    V. Weisskopf and E. Wigner. Berechnung der nat¨ urlichen Linienbreite auf Grund der Diracschen Lichttheorie. Z. Phys. 63, 54 (1930)

    1930

  87. [95]

    R. J. Hulet, E. S. Hilfer and D. Kleppner. Inhibited spontaneous emission by a Rydberg atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2137 (1985)

    1985

  88. [96]

    K. H. Drexhage, H. Kuhn and F. P. Sh¨ afer. Variation of the fluorescence decay time of a molecule in front of a mirror. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 72, 329 (1968)

    1968

  89. [97]

    J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn and R. D. Meade, Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light (Princeton University Press, 2008)

    2008

  90. [98]

    J. D. Joannopoulos, P. R. Villeneuve and S. Fan. Photonic crystals: putting a new twist on light. Nature 386, 143 (1997)

    1997

  91. [99]

    Al` u and N

    A. Al` u and N. Engheta. Polarizabilities and effective parameters for collections of spherical nanoparticles formed by pairs of concentric double-negative, single- negative, and/or double-positive metamaterial layers. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 094310 (2005)

    2005

  92. [100]

    Yablonovitch

    E. Yablonovitch. Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electron- ics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2059 (1987). Spontaneous emission and Purcell effect: some aspects 25

    1987

  93. [101]

    (see also Ref. [102]). By calculating the scattered field modes for this cloaking device, they used Eq. (7.5), concluding that the suppression of the Purcell effect occurs exactly under the same invisibility condition described above for classical radiation. Spontaneous emissi...

  94. [102]

    Al` u and N

    A. Al` u and N. Engheta. Achieving transparency with plasmonic and metamaterial coatings. Phys. Rev. E 72, 016623 (2005)

    2005

  95. [103]

    W. J. M. Kort-Kamp et al. Spontaneous emission in the presence of a spherical plasmonic metamaterial. Phys. Rev. A 87, 023837 (2013)

    2013

  96. [104]

    W. J. M. Kort-Kamp. Novel approaches to tailor and tune light-matter interactions at the nanoscale. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (2015)

    2015

  97. [105]

    C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (John Wiley & Sons, 1983)

    1983

  98. [106]

    W. C. Chew, Waves and fields in inhomogeneous media (IEEE Press, 1995)

    1995

  99. [107]

    H. E. Stanley. Scaling, universality, and renormalization: Three pillars of modern critical phenomena. Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, S358 (1999)

    1999

  100. [108]

    Zheng et al

    C. Zheng et al. Enabling active nanotechnologies by phase transition: from elec- tronics, photonics to thermotics. Chem. Rev. 122, 15450 (2022)

    2022

  101. [109]

    Huang and K

    J. Huang and K. Yu. Enhanced nonlinear optical responses of materials: Composite effects. Phys. Rep. 431, 87 (2006)

    2006

  102. [110]

    T. C. Choy, Effective Medium Theory: Principles and Applications (Oxford Uni- versity Press, 1999)

    1999

  103. [111]

    Szilard et al

    D. Szilard et al. Purcell effect at the percolation transition. Phys. Rev. B 94, 134204 (2016)

    2016

  104. [112]

    Novotny and B

    L. Novotny and B. Hecht, Principles of Nano-Optics (Cambridge University Press, 2006)

    2006

  105. [113]

    W. J. M. Kort-Kamp, F. S. S. Rosa, F. A. Pinheiro and C. Farina. Active magneto- optical control of spontaneous emission in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 92, 205415 (2015)

    2015

  106. [114]

    Sahimi, Applications of Percolation Theory (CRC Press, 1993)

    M. Sahimi, Applications of Percolation Theory (CRC Press, 1993)

    1993

  107. [115]

    A. K. Sarychev and V. M. Shalaev. Electromagnetic field fluctuations and optical nonlinearities in metal-dielectric composites. Phys. Rep. 335, 275 (2000)

    2000

  108. [116]

    Szilard et al

    D. Szilard et al. Hysteresis in the spontaneous emission induced by VO 2 phase change. JOSA B 36, C46 (2019)

    2019

  109. [117]

    F. J. Morin. Oxides which show a metal-to-insulator transition at the Neel temper- ature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 34 (1959)

    1959

  110. [118]

    H. W. Verleur, A. S. Barker and C. N. Berglund. Optical properties of VO2 between 0.25 and 5 eV. Phys. Rev. 172, 788 (1968)

    1968

  111. [119]

    Yang and S

    Z. Yang and S. Ramanathan. Breakthroughs in photonics 2014: phase change ma- terials for photonics. IEEE Photonics J. 7, 0700305 (2015)

    2015

  112. [120]

    Pergament, G

    A. Pergament, G. Stefanovich and A. Velichko. Oxide electronics and vanadium dioxide perspective: a review. J. Sel. Top. Nano Electron. Comput. 1, 24 (2013)

    2013

  113. [121]

    W. J. M. Kort-Kamp, S. Kramadhati, A. K. Azad, M. T. Reiten and D. A. R. Dalvit. Passive radiative ‘thermostat’ enabled by phase change photonic nanostructures. ACS Photonics 5, 4554 (2018)

    2018

  114. [122]

    Jin et al

    L. Jin et al. VO 2-based switchable thermal emitters using magnetic polaritons. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 317, 108937 (2024)

    2024

  115. [123]

    Peterseim, M

    T. Peterseim, M. Dressel, M. Dietrich and A. Polity. Optical properties of VO2 films at the phase transition: Influence of substrate and electronic correlations. J. Appl. 26 P. P. Abrantes, D. Szilard, and C. Farina Phys. 120, 075102 (2016)

    2016

  116. [124]

    Cueff et al

    S. Cueff et al. Dynamic control of light emission faster than the lifetime limit using VO2 phase-change. Nat. Commun. 6, 8636 (2015)

    2015

  117. [125]

    Cueff et al

    S. Cueff et al. VO 2 nanophotonics. APL Photonics 5, 110901 (2020)

    2020

  118. [126]

    Cunningham, H

    S. Cunningham, H. Calin and A. L. Bradley. Plasmonic nanodiscs on vanadium dioxide thin films for tunable luminescence enhancement. Opt. Express 29, 22288 (2021)

    2021

  119. [127]

    Liu et al

    Y. Liu et al. Temperature-modulated superradiance near phase transition material. Opt. Mater. 137, 113568 (2023)

    2023

  120. [128]

    P. P. Abrantes, W. J. M. Kort-Kamp, F. S. S. Rosa, C. Farina, F. A. Pinheiro and T. P. Cysne. Controlling electric and magnetic Purcell effects in phosphorene via strain engineering. Phys. Rev. B 108, 155427 (2023)

    2023

  121. [129]

    E. T. Sisakht, F. Fazileh, M. H. Zare, M. Zarenia and F. M. Peeters. Strain-induced topological phase transition in phosphorene and in phosphorene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. B 94, 085417 (2016)

    2016

  122. [130]

    Midtvedt, C

    D. Midtvedt, C. H. Lewenkopf and A. Croy. Strain-displacement relations for strain engineering in single-layer 2D materials. 2D Mater. 3, 011005 (2016)

    2016

  123. [131]

    Midtvedt, C

    D. Midtvedt, C. H. Lewenkopf and A. Croy. Multi-scale approach for strain- engineering of phosphorene. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 185702 (2017)

    2017

  124. [132]

    Wei and X

    Q. Wei and X. Peng. Superior mechanical flexibility of phosphorene and few-layer black phosphorus. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 251915 (2014)

    2014

  125. [133]

    X. Peng, Q. Wei and A. Copple. Strain-engineered direct-indirect band gap transi- tion and its mechanism in two-dimensional phosphorene. Phys. Rev. B 90, 085402 (2014)

    2014

  126. [134]

    Huang et al

    S. Huang et al. Strain-tunable van der Waals interactions in few-layer black phos- phorus. Nat. Commun. 10, 2447 (2019)

    2019

  127. [135]

    Quereda et al

    J. Quereda et al. Strong modulation of optical properties in black phosphorus through strain-engineered rippling. Nano Lett. 16, 2931 (2016)

    2016

  128. [136]

    Nemilentsau, T

    A. Nemilentsau, T. Low and G. Hanson. Anisotropic 2D materials for tunable hy- perbolic plasmonics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 066804 (2016)

    2016

  129. [137]

    S. Das, M. Demarteau and A. Roelofs. Ambipolar phosphorene field effect transistor. ACS Nano 8, 11730 (2014)

    2014

  130. [138]

    H. Lu, G. M. Carroll, N. R. Neale and M. C. Beard. Infrared quantum dots: progress, challenges, and opportunities. ACS Nano 13, 939 (2019)

    2019

  131. [139]

    Muniz, F

    Y. Muniz, F. S. S. da Rosa, C. Farina, D. Szilard and W. J. M. Kort-Kamp. Quan- tum two-photon emission in a photonic cavity. Phys. Rev. A 100, 023818 (2019)

    2019

  132. [140]

    Hayat, P

    A. Hayat, P. Ginzburg and M. Orenstein. Observation of two-photon emission from semiconductors. Nat. Photonics 2, 238 (2008)

    2008

  133. [141]

    Nevet et al

    A. Nevet et al. Plasmonic nanoantennas for broad-band enhancement of two-photon emission from semiconductors. Nano Lett. 10, 1848 (2010)

    2010

  134. [142]

    A. N. Poddubny, P. Ginzburg, P. A. Belov, A. V. Zayats and Y. S. Kivshar. Tai- loring and enhancing spontaneous two-photon emission using resonant plasmonic nanostructures. Phys. Rev. A 86, 033826 (2012)

    2012

  135. [143]

    Rivera, G

    N. Rivera, G. Rosolen, J. D. Joannopoulos, I. Kaminer and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c. Making two- photon processes dominate one-photon processes using mid-IR phonon polaritons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 13607 (2017)

    2017

  136. [144]

    Muniz, A

    Y. Muniz, A. Manjavacas, C. Farina, D. A. R. Dalvit and W. J. M. Kort-Kamp. Spontaneous emission and Purcell effect: some aspects 27 Two-photon spontaneous emission in atomically thin plasmonic nanostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 033601 (2020)

    2020

  137. [145]

    Muniz, P

    Y. Muniz, P. P. Abrantes, L. Martin-Moreno, F. A. Pinheiro, C. Farina and W. J. M. Kort-Kamp. Entangled two-plasmon generation in carbon nanotubes and graphene- coated wires. Phys. Rev. B 105, 165412 (2022)

    2022

  138. [146]

    Weitzel, Y

    L. Weitzel, Y. Muniz, C. Farina and C. A. D. Zarro. Two-photon spontaneous emission of an atom in a cosmic string background. Phys. Rev. D106, 045020 (2022)

    2022

  139. [147]

    Whisler, G

    C. Whisler, G. Holdman, D. D. Yavuz and V. W. Brar. Enhancing two-photon spontaneous emission in rare earths using graphene and graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. B 107, 195420 (2023)

    2023

  140. [148]

    Cysne, W

    T. Cysne, W. J. M. Kort-Kamp, D. Oliver, F. A. Pinheiro, F. S. S. Rosa and C. Fa- rina. Tuning the Casimir-Polder interaction via magneto-optical effects in graphene. Phys. Rev. A 90, 052511 (2014)

    2014

  141. [149]

    Jiang and F

    Q.-D. Jiang and F. Wilczek. Chiral Casimir forces: Repulsive, enhanced, tunable. Phys. Rev. B 99, 125403 (2019)

    2019

  142. [150]

    Fuchs, R

    S. Fuchs, R. Bennett, R. V. Krems and S. Y. Buhmann. Nonadditivity of optical and Casimir-Polder potentials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 083603 (2018)

    2018

  143. [151]

    T. Haug, S. Y. Buhmann and R. Bennett. Casimir-Polder potential in the presence of a Fock state. Phys. Rev. A 99, 012508 (2019)

    2019

  144. [152]

    Silvestre, T

    M. Silvestre, T. P. Cysne, D. Szilard, F. A. Pinheiro and C. Farina. Tuning quantum reflection in graphene with an external magnetic field. Phys. Rev. A 100, 033605 (2019)

    2019

  145. [153]

    Fiscelli, L

    G. Fiscelli, L. Rizzuto and R. Passante. Dispersion interaction between two hydro- gen atoms in a static electric field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 013604 (2020)

    2020

  146. [154]

    P. P. Abrantes, T. P. Cysne, D. Szilard, F. S. S. Rosa, F. A. Pinheiro and C. Farina. Probing topological phase transitions via quantum reflection in the graphene family materials. Phys. Rev. B 104, 075409 (2021)

    2021

  147. [155]

    P. P. Abrantes, V. Pessanha, R. M. Souza and C. Farina. Controlling the atom- sphere interaction with an external electric field. Phys. Rev. A 104, 022820 (2021)

    2021

  148. [156]

    P. P. Abrantes. Different strategies to harness quantum electrodynamics phenomena at low energies. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (2021)

    2021

  149. [157]

    B.-S. Lu. The Casimir effect in topological matter. Universe 7, 237 (2021)

    2021

  150. [158]

    Laliotis, B.-S

    A. Laliotis, B.-S. Lu, M. Ducloy and D. Wilkowski. Atom-surface physics: A review. A VS Quantum Sci.3, 043501 (2021)

    2021

  151. [159]

    Rodriguez-Lopez, W

    P. Rodriguez-Lopez, W. J. M. Kort-Kamp, D. A. R. Dalvit and L. M. Woods. Casimir force phase transitions in the graphene family. Nat. Commun. 8, 14699 (2017)

    2017

  152. [160]

    Muniz, C

    Y. Muniz, C. Farina and W. J. M. Kort-Kamp. Casimir forces in the flatland: Interplay between photoinduced phase transitions and quantum Hall physics. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023061 (2021)

    2021

  153. [161]

    Kilianski and R

    R. Kilianski and R. Bennett. Designer quantum reflection from a micropore. Phys. Rev. A 109, 032812 (2024)

    2024

  154. [162]

    R. M. Ab. Ekeroth, P. B. Abdallah, J. C. Cuevas and A. Garc ´ ıa-Mart ´ ın. Anisotropic thermal magnetoresistance for an active control of radiative heat transfer. ACS Pho- tonics 5, 705 (2018)

    2018

  155. [163]

    Ghanekar, M

    A. Ghanekar, M. Ricci, Y. Tian, O. Gregory and Y. Zheng. Strain-induced modu- lation of near-field radiative transfer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 241104 (2018). 28 P. P. Abrantes, D. Szilard, and C. Farina

    2018

  156. [164]

    H. Wu, Y. Huang, L. Cui and K. Zhu. Active magneto-optical control of near-field radiative heat transfer between graphene sheets. Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 054020 (2019)

    2019

  157. [165]

    L. Ge, K. Gong, Y. Cang, Y. Luo, X. Shi and Y. Wu. Magnetically tunable multi- band near-field radiative heat transfer between two graphene sheets. Phys. Rev. B 100, 035414 (2019)

    2019

  158. [166]

    Pascale, M

    M. Pascale, M. Giteau and G. T. Papadakis. Perspective on near-field radiative heat transfer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 122, 100501 (2023)

    2023

  159. [167]

    Tang et al

    L. Tang et al. Corner- and edge-mode enhancement of near-field radiative heat transfer. Nature 629, 67 (2024)

    2024

  160. [168]

    Rinc´ on-Garc ´ ıa, D

    L. Rinc´ on-Garc ´ ıa, D. Thompson, R. Mittapally, N. Agra ¨ ıt, E. Meyhofer and P. Reddy. Enhancement and Saturation of Near-Field Radiative Heat Transfer in Nanogaps between Metallic Surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 145901 (2022)

    2022

  161. [169]

    Mittapally, J

    R. Mittapally, J. W. Lim, E. Meyhofer, P. Reddy and B. Song. Quantifying the effect of nanofilms on near-field radiative heat transfer. ACS Photonics, 10, 2474 (2023)

    2023

  162. [170]

    Salihoglu, J

    H. Salihoglu, J. Shi, Z. Li, Z. Wang, X. Luo, I. V. Bondarev, S.-A. Biehs and S. Shen. Nonlocal near-field radiative heat transfer by transdimensional plasmonics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 086901 (2023)

    2023

  163. [171]

    P. P. Abrantes, D. Szilard, F. S. S. Rosa and C. Farina. Resonance energy transfer at percolation transition. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35, 2040022 (2020)

    2020

  164. [172]

    P. P. Abrantes, G. Bastos, D. Szilard, C. Farina and F. S. S. Rosa. Tuning resonance energy transfer with magneto-optical properties of graphene. Phys. Rev. B 103, 174421 (2021)

    2021

  165. [173]

    Lee and L.-Y

    M.-W. Lee and L.-Y. Hsu. Polariton-assisted resonance energy transfer beyond res- onant dipole-dipole interaction: A transition-current-density approach. Phys. Rev. A 107, 053709 (2023)

    2023

  166. [174]

    H. Liu, C. Li, J. Li, Y. Cheng, J. Zhao, J. Chen and M. Sun. Plasmon-enhanced fluorescence resonance energy transfer in different nanostructures and nanomaterials. Appl. Mater. Today 30, 101731 (2023)

    2023

  167. [175]

    S. H. Nayem, B. Sikder and S. Z. Uddin. Anisotropic energy transfer near multi-layer black phosphorus. 2D Mater. 10, 045022 (2023)

    2023

  168. [176]

    Oliveira-Cony, P

    J. Oliveira-Cony, P. P. Abrantes, C. Farina and T. P. Cysne. Anisotropic resonance energy transfer with strained phosphorene. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.07121 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.