Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 100 references

Time-domain field correlation measurements enable tomography of highly multimode quantum states of light

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Time-delay scans can reconstruct the unknown modes of multimode quantum light.

desk verdict A promising tomography scheme whose central reconstruction equation has a basis error that must be fixed before the method can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.10483 v1 pith:7HNJ6PDS submitted 2025-06-12 quant-ph physics.optics

Emanuel Hubenschmid , Guido Burkard This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.optics MSC 81P5081V80 PACS 03.65.Wj42.50.Xa42.65.Ky
keywords quantumstatetomographyquadraturecorrelationmeasurementsmultimodeGaussianstateselectro-opticsamplingtime-domainmeasurementsingularvaluedecompositionsubcycleresolutiontemporalmodes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the complete second-moment information of a highly multimode Gaussian state of light can be reconstructed from time-domain quadrature correlation measurements, without knowing the optical mode basis in advance. The key move is to use two short local-oscillator pulses that are independently time-delayed against the quantum pulse, so that each measurement picks out a different, overlapping temporal window. A singular value decomposition performed on the measured correlation matrix orthogonalizes those overlapping windows in post-processing and yields the covariance matrix projected onto the accessible mode subspace. The number of reconstructable modes is set by the number of time delays and the bandwidth of the local oscillator. If correct, this supplies a full tomography route for multimode Gaussian light and, via electro-optic sampling, extends subcycle-resolution measurements into the THz-to-mid-infrared range.

What carries the argument

The central object is the singular value decomposition of the matrix Z_LO of time-delayed local-oscillator phase-space vectors. Because the two local-oscillator pulses overlap in time, the measured correlators mix the underlying orthogonal modes; the SVD orthogonalizes these overlapping vectors, the projector P = Sigma Sigma^+ selects the numerically well-conditioned directions, and singular values below $10^{-3}$ times the maximum are set to zero to avoid instability. The same formalism covers both homodyne detection and electro-optic sampling, with the electro-optic case replacing the local-oscillator vector by its image under the symplectic transformation M_NL($\alpha$) generated by the nonlinear crystal.

What would settle it

Prepare a multimode squeezed vacuum whose third principal mode is centered outside the local-oscillator bandwidth and scan only delays that cover the first two modes. If the algorithm's recovered covariance matrix is claimed to be complete, it will instead return rank two, and the measured correlation matrix will contain residuals above the shot-noise floor that cannot be explained by the reconstructed state; demonstrating such residuals would falsify the completeness of the reconstruction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for a multimode Gaussian state, whose Wigner function is entirely fixed by its covariance matrix, the covariance matrix can be recovered from correlation measurements of two simultaneously detected quadratures at many time delays. Writing the measured correlation matrix as corr = Z_LO^T cov_rho Z_LO - Z_LO^T cov_vac Z_LO, where Z_LO collects the time-delayed local-oscillator phase-space vectors, the singular value decomposition Z_LO = U Sigma V^T and the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse give P cov_rho,U P = (V Sigma^+)^T corr V Sigma^+ + (1/2) U P U^T. This recovers the covariance matrix projected onto the subspace spanned by the local-oscillator states, with the rank of the projector equal to the number of resolved temporal modes, and it does not require prior knowledge of the mode basis of the quantum state.

Load-bearing premise

The reconstruction assumes that the measured set of time-delayed local-oscillator states spans the subspace containing every mode that contributes significantly to the quantum state; if the delay grid or the local-oscillator bandwidth misses a significant mode, the SVD projector silently discards it and the recovered covariance is incomplete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A highly multimode Gaussian state can be tomographed from time-domain data alone, with no prior mode basis, by scanning N time delays and reading out the resulting rank(P) modes.
  • The number of reconstructable modes grows linearly with the number of time delays until a plateau set by the local-oscillator bandwidth and the SVD cutoff, so shorter local oscillators resolve more modes.
  • In the electro-optic-sampling implementation, the reconstructed modes are shifted toward lower frequencies, reaching the THz-to-mid-infrared range and potentially resolving subcycle dynamics.
  • Time-local measurements are insufficient for strongly squeezed or thermal states because detection thermalises the state through entanglement breaking; two-time correlation measurements are necessary, and they reveal quantum correlations such as discord even when entanglement vanishes.
  • The derived full joint statistics also allow spectral information about pulsed Fock states to be extracted, since the compatibility of the two quadrature measurements oscillates with twice the carrier frequency of the quantum pulse.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension is to feed the algorithm a known state engineered with modes outside the chosen delay grid; the recovered covariance should match the true projection, and the residual unmeasured correlations should reveal exactly which modes were missed.
  • Because the SVD cutoff effectively imposes a low-rank approximation, the scheme could be combined with compressive or adaptive delay-grid strategies to minimize the number of measurements when only a few modes carry significant variance.
  • The joint-statistics formalism developed for Fock states suggests that the same correlation setup could be used to reconstruct wavefunctions of non-Gaussian THz sources, not just their spectral information.
  • The mode-independent entanglement discussion in the methods hints that correlation data could certify entanglement in a way that does not require choosing a mode basis in advance.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes 'correlation tomography,' a Gaussian-state reconstruction scheme based on time-domain quadrature correlation measurements with two independently time-delayed local-oscillator pulses. The central idea is to assemble the measurement correlation matrix from many delay settings and then orthogonalize the local-oscillator states in post-processing via SVD, recovering the covariance matrix of a highly multimode Gaussian state projected onto the spanned temporal-mode subspace. The scheme is developed for both homodyne detection and electro-optic sampling, the latter including a nonperturbative treatment of the nonlinear detection interaction and optimization of the probe amplitude. The paper further analyzes thermalization and quantum correlations in the detected state, and derives the joint measurement statistics for non-Gaussian states, showing how correlation measurements can extract spectral information about pulsed Fock states.

Significance. If the central reconstruction formula is correct, the paper offers a useful conceptual advance: it avoids the need for a priori knowledge of the mode basis, which is a known bottleneck in multimode continuous-variable tomography. The detailed symplectic derivations, the Magnus-expansion treatment of electro-optic sampling, and the closed-form Fock-state joint statistics are valuable and go beyond previous work. The claimed scaling of the number of reconstructable modes with the number of time delays and LO bandwidth is falsifiable and testable. However, the core reconstruction equation contains a basis/sign error in the rank-deficient case, and the numerical section does not actually demonstrate reconstruction of a known multimode state; the significance is therefore conditional on these points being fixed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II, Eq. (7)] Equation (7) is not correct as written when Z_LO is rank deficient. With Z_LO = U\Sigma V^T and P = \Sigma\Sigma^+, the left-hand side P cov_{\rho,U} P is expressed in the U-rotated basis, while the vacuum term (1/2) U P U^T is expressed in the original basis. Since U P U^T \neq P when P \neq I, this term couples measured and unmeasured coordinates. The correct identity is P cov_{\rho,U} P = (V\Sigma^+)^T corr V\Sigma^+ + (1/2) P if corr is the raw measurement correlation matrix, or with no additive term if corr already has the vacuum contribution subtracted as in Eq. (6). Please correct this equation and re-derive the reconstruction step; it is the central formula of the paper.
  2. [Sec. II, Fig. 2] The numerical demonstration does not include an end-to-end reconstruction test. The paper shows the rank of the projector P and the reconstructed mode functions, but never generates a known multimode squeezed state, applies the protocol, and compares the reconstructed covariance matrix with the true one (e.g., via fidelity or trace distance). Without such a test, the claim that the scheme 'reconstructs' highly multimode Gaussian states is not fully supported, especially because the singular-value cutoff in step 3 projects the state onto a subspace. Please add a numerical reconstruction experiment with a known input state and report the reconstruction error.
  3. [Sec. II, step 3, and Fig. 2a] The paper correctly notes that only the projection onto the span of the time-delayed local-oscillator vectors is recovered, and that singular values below 10^-3 times the maximum are discarded. For an unknown state, however, there is no self-check that the chosen delay grid and LO bandwidth cover all significant modes. The claim of 'full' tomography is therefore stronger than what the algorithm guarantees. Please either provide a convergence criterion (for example, increasing the number of delays and checking stabilization of the reconstructed covariance) or explicitly state that the scheme performs partial tomography of the spanned subspace; this limitation should be acknowledged in the abstract and conclusions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (5)] Please clarify that Z_LO is assembled from column vectors and state its dimensions explicitly; the notation (\zeta_LO(\Gamma_i) | i \leq 2N) is ambiguous.
  2. [Eq. (7)] The symbol cov_{\rho,U} is introduced only in this equation. Please define it explicitly in the text and, after correcting Eq. (7), state whether the reconstructed matrix is in the U-rotated basis or in the original basis.
  3. [Sec. IV and Methods C] The symbols \sigma_x and \sigma_p are used both for singular values of the Schur complement and for quadrature variances. Please use distinct notation to avoid confusion.
  4. [Fig. 2] The two panels in Fig. 2a (homodyne and electro-optic sampling) are visually crowded; separate color bars and clearer panel labels would improve readability.
  5. [Note added] The related work in Ref. [84] is mentioned only in a note. Since it appears close in content, please briefly discuss its relation to the present scheme in the introduction or conclusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central reconstruction is an algebraic inversion of a stated forward measurement model, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction; self-citations are background and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central reconstruction chain is linear algebra applied to a clearly stated forward model. Equation (6) defines the measured correlation matrix as corr = Z_LO^T cov_rho Z_LO minus Z_LO^T (1/2) Z_LO, and Equation (7) is intended to be the algebraic inversion of this relation on the subspace selected by the SVD of Z_LO. The reconstructed object is the projected covariance P cov_{rho,U} P, which is obtained from the data corr and the independently characterized local-oscillator vectors Z_LO; no state-dependent parameter is fitted and then renamed as a prediction. The paper explicitly states that the result corresponds to the marginal distribution on the reconstructable subspace (Sec. II, text after Eq. (7)), so the completeness assumption about the delay grid and the local-oscillator bandwidth is a stated limitation rather than a circular step. The thermalisation and Fock-state results are consistency studies using the same nonlinear model, not fitted predictions. Self-citations [40,49,66] support background concepts such as the POVM description of multichannel electro-optic sampling, entanglement-breaking thermalisation, and half-wave-plate suppression, while the mode basis and interaction kernels are defined in the Methods and Supplementary sections; those self-citations are therefore not load-bearing. A separate mathematical concern, not a circularity, is that the vacuum term 1/2 U P U^T in Eq. (7) appears to be written in the original basis while the remaining terms are in the U-rotated basis; for rank-deficient P this term may not reduce to 1/2 P, which would mean the equation does not return the projected covariance. If confirmed, that is a correctness risk in the central formula, but it is an inversion error rather than an equivalence between input and output by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central reconstruction derivation rests on standard quantum-optical modeling of homodyne detection and electro-optic sampling. The main hand-chosen inputs are the mode-basis truncation, the singular value cutoff, the delay grid, and the electro-optic probe amplitude; these affect the demonstrated performance but are not fitted to a target state. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • imax (mode basis truncation index) = not stated in main text
    The continuous field is discretized using imax subcycle modes; the reconstruction and all figures depend on this truncation, but the exact value used in numerics is not reported.
  • singular value cutoff = 1e-3 times maximal singular value
    Set in Sec. II step 3 to avoid numerical instability; it directly sets rank(P) and therefore the reported number of reconstructable modes in Fig. 2a.
  • time-delay sampling interval = homodyne [-12 fs, 12 fs], EOS [-17 fs, 17 fs]
    The number of independent LO vectors, and thus the reconstructed mode count, depends on the chosen delay grid; these intervals are chosen for the numerical examples.
  • probe amplitude for electro-optic sampling = alpha_DX = -1.94e6 (p-quadrature) and +1.78e6 (x-quadrature)
    Chosen by the Schur-decomposition optimization in Supplement X to suppress unwanted frequency contributions; not fitted to the target state.
  • subcycle basis parameters sigma0, k0 = sigma0 = 100 THz, k0 = 0.5
    Parameters of the mode basis used throughout; chosen to represent subcycle dynamics, not derived from the target state.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The pulsed field can be represented in a finite Hilbert space of imax temporal modes via the subcycle basis and generalized Laguerre polynomials.
    Introduced in Methods A and Supplement VI; all calculations use this truncation.
  • domain assumption The nonlinear interaction in electro-optic sampling is accurately described to first order in the Magnus expansion, with second-order contributions negligible for probe amplitudes below about 2e10.
    Supplement IX compares prefactors and estimates the threshold; this justifies the symplectic matrix MNL(alpha).
  • domain assumption The local oscillator can be treated as a strong classical coherent pulse, so the photon-count difference is linear in the quadrature operators (Eq. 2, Supplement VII).
    The quadrature linearization neglects terms beyond first order in the LO amplitude.
  • standard math Standard Gaussian quantum information tools are valid: Wigner function, symplectic transformations, von Neumann entropy, logarithmic negativity, and quantum discord.
    Used throughout the paper; references [3,32,87,88] provide the underlying results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Time-domain field correlation measurements enable tomography of highly multimode quantum states of light." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7HNJ6PDS

@misc{pith2026250610483,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Time-domain field correlation measurements enable tomography of highly multimode quantum states of light},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7HNJ6PDS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.10483}
}
read the original abstract

Recent progress in ultrafast optics facilitates the investigation of the dynamics of highly multimode quantum states of light, as demonstrated by the application of electro-optic sampling to quantum states of the electromagnetic field. Yet, the complete tomographic reconstruction of optical quantum states with prior unknown statistics and dynamics is still challenging, since state-of-the-art tomographic methods require the measurement of many orthogonal, distinguishable modes. Here, we propose a tomography scheme based on time-domain quadrature correlation measurements and theoretically demonstrate its ability to reconstruct highly multimode Gaussian states. In contrast to (eight-port) homodyne detection, the two local oscillator pulses are shorter in time and are (independently) time-delayed against the pulsed quantum state. The distinguishable mode structure is obtained in post-processing from the correlation measurement data by orthogonalization. We show that the number of reconstructable modes increases with the number of time delays used and decreases with the temporal extent of the local oscillator. We extend and optimise our proposed correlation measurement to electro-optic sampling by adding a nonlinear crystal prior to the homodyne detection, potentially achieving subcycle resolution in the mid-infrared to THz regime. By analysing the (quantum) correlations present in the measurement data, we show how thermalisation of the quantum state during detection leads to the requirement of correlation measurements. The thermalisation is especially pronounced in the strong squeezing limit, for which we developed a non-perturbative theory. Furthermore, we open an avenue to extending our tomography scheme to non-Gaussian states by theoretically establishing the complete measurement statistics and showing how to obtain spectral information about pulsed Fock states from the joint statistics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.10483 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: b. At a difference between the time delays corresponding to even multiples of half an optical cycle of 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparison between the prefactors in the first order and second order Magnus expansion as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: shows an example of time local sampling of the single mode squeezed states as well as the signal obtained from the reconstructed state using the above algorithm, showing good agreement of the two signals. Squeezing is necessary since otherwise (i.e., σx = σp = σ) we g…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. The time domain correlated signal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [49]

    Leonhardt and H

    U. Leonhardt and H. Paul, High-accuracy optical homodyne detection with low-efficiency detectors: ”preampli- fication” from antisqueezing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 4086 (1994). 45

    work page 1994

  2. [1]

    Using ζT LO(0, π/2)˜ζx = 0 and ζT LO(0, 0)˜ζp = 0, as well as assuming ∥ζLO(∆t, φ)∥ = 1, we can calculate the squeezing ratio r = g (0, 0, 0, 0)− 1/2 g (0, 0, π/2, π/2) − 1/2 = σx − 1/2 σp − 1/2 , (125) independent of the overlap between the local oscillator and the state

  3. [2]

    The sign has to be chosen accordingly

    Now we can calculate the scaled modulus of the overlap of the local oscillator with one of the broadband quadratures r [g (∆t, ∆t, 0, 0)− 1 2 ] − r [g (∆t, ∆t, π/2, π/2) − 1 2 ] = ±κζT LO(∆t, 0)ζp, (126) with κ = q [1 − ( σx −1/2 σp−1/2 )2](σp − 1 2 ). The sign has to be chosen accordingly

  4. [3]

    )T and σ = ( g (∆t1, ∆t1, 0, 0) − 1/2, g (∆t2, ∆t2, 0, 0) − 1/2,

    Making measurements for different ∆ti and collecting them in a matrix XLO = (ζT LO(∆t1, 0), ζT LO(∆t2, 0), . . .)T and σ = ( g (∆t1, ∆t1, 0, 0) − 1/2, g (∆t2, ∆t2, 0, 0) − 1/2, . . .)T, we can obtain a scaled projection, 36 −10 0 10 −1 0 1 2 g(∆ t, ∆ t, ϕ a, ϕ b) −10 0 10 −1 0 1 2 Time delay ∆ t (ps) ϕ a = ϕ b = 0 ϕ a = ϕ b = π/ 2 ϕ a = 0 , ϕ b = π/ 2 Rec...

  5. [4]

    If XLO is of full rank, we can calculate ζp by normalizing X + LOσ

  6. [5]

    2 {ζT d,ph(xa, pb)e x }2 σ2 x − 4σx # L (− 1 2 ) n−i

    Now we can calculate σx , σp and in a similar manner to ˜ζx . Fig. 13 shows an example of time local sampling of the single mode squeezed states as well as the signal obtained from the reconstructed state using the above algorithm, showing good agreement of the two signals. Squeezing is necessary since otherwise (i.e., σx = σp = σ) we get a signal g (∆t, ...

  7. [6]

    This occurs for example for time local detection, i.e., ∆ta = ∆tb

    Let us consider the case with σx = σp = σ. This occurs for example for time local detection, i.e., ∆ta = ∆tb. In this case we can define the detection probability p = σx /4, the binomial distribution bin(k; p, n) = n k (1 − p)n−kpk and the Husimi function of a Fock state, Qn(x, p) = x 2 + p2 2 n 1 πn! exp − 1 2 x 2 + p2 2 . (161) With these definitions th...

  8. [7]

    The second case occurs for correlations measurements with ∆ta ̸= ∆tb if σx ≈ 2. In this case the probability distribution along the phase-space line defined by ζT d,ph(xa, pb)e p = 0 can be written as p(xa, pb) = N(xa, pb) 2−n √ 2πn! Z |Hn(x)|2 exp h xζT d,ph(xa, pb)e x − σx 2 x 2 i dx. (163) There are two cases with σp ≈ 2. (a) The intermediate case, in ...

Show all 100 references
  1. [8]

    Gulla, K

    J. Gulla, K. Ryen, and J. Skaar, Limits for realizing single photons (2021), arXiv:2109.06472 [quant-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Yanagimoto, E

    R. Yanagimoto, E. Ng, M. Jankowski, R. Nehra, T. P. McKenna, T. Onodera, L. G. Wright, R. Hamerly, A. Marandi, M. M. Fejer, and H. Mabuchi, Mesoscopic ultrafast nonlinear optics—the emergence of multimode quantum non-gaussian physics, Optica 11, 896 (2024)

    2024

  3. [10]

    Weedbrook, S

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc ´ ıa-Patr´ on, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaussian quantum information, Reviews of Modern Physics 84, 621 (2012)

    2012

  4. [11]

    S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, Quantum information with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005)

    2005

  5. [12]

    Weedbrook, A

    C. Weedbrook, A. M. Lance, W. P. Bowen, T. Symul, T. C. Ralph, and P. K. Lam, Quantum cryptography without switching, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 170504 (2004)

    2004

  6. [13]

    A. M. Lance, T. Symul, V. Sharma, C. Weedbrook, T. C. Ralph, and P. K. Lam, No-switching quantum key distribution using broadband modulated coherent light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 180503 (2005)

    2005

  7. [14]

    L. S. Madsen, V. C. Usenko, M. Lassen, R. Filip, and U. L. Andersen, Continuous variable quantum key distribution with modulated entangled states, Nat. Commun. 3, 10.1038/ncomms2097 (2012)

    2012 doi

  8. [15]

    V. C. Usenko and F. Grosshans, Unidimensional continuous-variable quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. A 92, 062337 (2015)

    2015

  9. [16]

    Diamanti and A

    E. Diamanti and A. Leverrier, Distributing secret keys with quantum continuous variables: Principle, security and implementations, Entropy 17, 6072 (2015). 43

    2015

  10. [17]

    Hosseinidehaj, Z

    N. Hosseinidehaj, Z. Babar, R. Malaney, S. X. Ng, and L. Hanzo, Satellite-based continuous-variable quantum communications: State-of-the-art and a predictive outlook, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21, 881 (2019)

    2019

  11. [18]

    Silberhorn, T

    C. Silberhorn, T. C. Ralph, N. L¨ utkenhaus, and G. Leuchs, Continuous variable quantum cryptography: Beating the 3 db loss limit, Physical Review Letters 89, 167901 (2002)

    2002

  12. [19]

    Hillery, Quantum cryptography with squeezed states, Physical Review A 61, 022309 (2000)

    M. Hillery, Quantum cryptography with squeezed states, Physical Review A 61, 022309 (2000)

    2000

  13. [20]

    R. E. Slusher, P. Grangier, A. LaPorta, B. Yurke, and M. J. Potasek, Pulsed squeezed light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2566 (1987)

    1987

  14. [21]

    Hirano and M

    T. Hirano and M. Matsuoka, Broadband squeezing of light by pulse excitation, Opt. Lett. 15, 1153 (1990)

    1990

  15. [22]

    D. T. Smithey, M. Beck, M. Belsley, and M. G. Raymer, Sub-shot-noise correlation of total photon number using macroscopic twin pulses of light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2650 (1992)

    1992

  16. [23]

    D. T. Smithey, M. Beck, J. Cooper, and M. G. Raymer, Measurement of number-phase uncertainty relations of optical fields, Phys. Rev. A 48, 3159 (1993)

    1993

  17. [24]

    D. T. Smithey, M. Beck, M. G. Raymer, and A. Faridani, Measurement of the Wigner distribution and the density matrix of a light mode using optical homodyne tomography: Application to squeezed states and the vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1244 (1993)

    1993

  18. [25]

    Zavatta, M

    A. Zavatta, M. Bellini, P. L. Ramazza, F. Marin, and F. T. Arecchi, Time-domain analysis of quantum states of light: noise characterization and homodyne tomography, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 19, 1189 (2002)

    2002

  19. [26]

    Zavatta, S

    A. Zavatta, S. Viciani, and M. Bellini, Non-classical field characterization by high-frequency, time-domain quantum homodyne tomography, Laser Phys. Lett. 3, 3 (2005)

    2005

  20. [27]

    Haderka, V

    O. Haderka, V. Mich´ alek, V. Urb´ aˇ sek, and M. Jeˇ zek, Fast time-domain balanced homodyne detection of light, Appl. Optics 48, 2884 (2009)

    2009

  21. [28]

    Okubo, M

    R. Okubo, M. Hirano, Y. Zhang, and T. Hirano, Pulse-resolved measurement of quadrature phase amplitudes of squeezed pulse trains at a repetition rate of 76 MHz, Opt. Lett. 33, 1458 (2008)

    2008

  22. [29]

    Ansari, G

    V. Ansari, G. Harder, M. Allgaier, B. Brecht, and C. Silberhorn, Temporal-mode measurement tomography of a quantum pulse gate, Phys. Rev. A 96, 063817 (2017)

    2017

  23. [30]

    Tiedau, V

    J. Tiedau, V. S. Shchesnovich, D. Mogilevtsev, V. Ansari, G. Harder, T. J. Bartley, N. Korolkova, and C. Sil- berhorn, Quantum state and mode profile tomography by the overlap, New J. Phys. 20, 033003 (2018)

    2018

  24. [31]

    Ansari, J

    V. Ansari, J. M. Donohue, M. Allgaier, L. Sansoni, B. Brecht, J. Roslund, N. Treps, G. Harder, and C. Silberhorn, Tomography and purification of the temporal-mode structure of quantum light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 213601 (2018)

    2018

  25. [32]

    Gil-Lopez, Y

    J. Gil-Lopez, Y. S. Teo, S. De, B. Brecht, H. Jeong, C. Silberhorn, and L. L. S´ anchez-Soto, Universal compressive tomography in the time-frequency domain, Optica 8, 1296 (2021)

    2021

  26. [33]

    Kalash and M

    M. Kalash and M. V. Chekhova, Wigner function tomography via optical parametric amplification, Optica 10, 44 1142 (2023)

    2023

  27. [34]

    Serino, J

    L. Serino, J. Gil-Lopez, M. Stefszky, R. Ricken, C. Eigner, B. Brecht, and C. Silberhorn, Realization of a multi-output quantum pulse gate for decoding high-dimensional temporal modes of single-photon states, PRX Quantum 4, 020306 (2023)

    2023

  28. [35]

    Mr´ owczy´ nski and B

    S. Mr´ owczy´ nski and B. M¨ uller, Wigner functional approach to quantum field dynamics, Physical Review D50, 7542 (1994)

    1994

  29. [36]

    F. S. Roux and N. Fabre, Wigner functional theory for quantum optics (2019)

    2019

  30. [37]

    Virally and B

    S. Virally and B. Reulet, Unidimensional time-domain quantum optics, Physical Review A 100, 023833 (2019)

    2019

  31. [38]

    F. S. Roux, Erratum: Combining spatiotemporal and particle-number degrees of freedom [phys. rev. a 98, 043841 (2018)], Physical Review A 101, 019903 (2020)

    2018

  32. [39]

    Adesso, S

    G. Adesso, S. Ragy, and A. R. Lee, Continuous variable quantum information: Gaussian states and beyond, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 21, 1440001 (2014) 10.1142/S1230161214400010 (2014), arXiv:1401.4679 [quant-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  33. [40]

    M. G. Raymer and I. A. Walmsley, Temporal modes in quantum optics: then and now, Physica Scripta 95, 064002 (2020)

    2020

  34. [41]

    Brecht, D

    B. Brecht, D. V. Reddy, C. Silberhorn, and M. G. Raymer, Photon temporal modes: A complete framework for quantum information science, Physical Review X 5, 041017 (2015)

    2015

  35. [42]

    N. G. Walker and J. E. Carroll, Multiport homodyne detection near the quantum noise limit, Opt. Quant. Electron. 18, 355 (1986)

    1986

  36. [43]

    Freyberger, K

    M. Freyberger, K. Vogel, and W. P. Schleich, From photon counts to quantum phase, Phys. Lett. A 176, 41 (1993)

    1993

  37. [44]

    Leonhardt and H

    U. Leonhardt and H. Paul, Realistic optical homodyne measurements and quasiprobability distributions, Phys. Rev. A 48, 4598 (1993)

    1993

  38. [45]

    Zucchetti, W

    A. Zucchetti, W. Vogel, and D.-G. Welsch, Quantum-state homodyne measurement with vacuum ports, Phys. Rev. A 54, 856 (1996)

    1996

  39. [46]

    ˇReh´ aˇ cek, Y

    J. ˇReh´ aˇ cek, Y. S. T., Z. Hradil, and S. Wallentowitz, Surmounting intrinsic quantum-measurement uncertainties in Gaussian-state tomography with quadrature squeezing, Sci. Rep. 5, 10.1038/srep12289 (2015)

    2015 doi

  40. [47]

    Hubenschmid, T

    E. Hubenschmid, T. L. M. Guedes, and G. Burkard, Complete positive operator-valued measure description of multichannel quantum electro-optic sampling with monochromatic field modes, Phys. Rev. A 106, 043713 (2022)

    2022

  41. [48]

    Vogel and H

    K. Vogel and H. Risken, Determination of quasiprobability distributions in terms of probability distributions for the rotated quadrature phase, Phys. Rev. A 40, 2847 (1989)

    1989

  42. [50]

    Wallentowitz and W

    S. Wallentowitz and W. Vogel, Unbalanced homodyning for quantum state measurements, Phys. Rev. A 53, 4528 (1996)

    1996

  43. [51]

    Breitenbach, S

    G. Breitenbach, S. Schiller, and J. Mlynek, Measurement of the quantum states of squeezed light, Nature 387, 471 (1997)

    1997

  44. [52]

    A. Luis, J. Sperling, and W. Vogel, Nonclassicality phase-space functions: More insight with fewer detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 103602 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    Bohmann, J

    M. Bohmann, J. Tiedau, T. Bartley, J. Sperling, C. Silberhorn, and W. Vogel, Incomplete detection of nonclas- sical phase-space distributions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 063607 (2018)

    2018

  46. [54]

    Knyazev, K

    E. Knyazev, K. Y. Spasibko, M. V. Chekhova, and F. Y. Khalili, Quantum tomography enhanced through parametric amplification, New J. Phys. 20, 013005 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    Olivares, A

    S. Olivares, A. Allevi, G. Caiazzo, M. G. A. Paris, and M. Bondani, Quantum tomography of light states by photon-number-resolving detectors, New J. Phys. 21, 103045 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    Hubenschmid, T

    E. Hubenschmid, T. L. M. Guedes, and G. Burkard, Optical time-domain quantum state tomography on a subcycle scale, Physical Review X 14, 041032 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    G. Yang, M. Kizmann, A. Leitenstorfer, and A. S. Moskalenko, Subcycle tomography of quantum light (2023), arXiv:2307.12812 [quant-ph]

    2023

  50. [58]

    S. Onoe, S. Virally, and D. V. Seletskiy, Direct measurement of the husimi-q function of the electric-field in the time-domain (2023), arXiv:2307.13088 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Lordi, E

    N. Lordi, E. J. Tsao, A. J. Lind, S. A. Diddams, and J. Combes, Quantum theory of temporally mismatched homodyne measurements with applications to optical-frequency-comb metrology, Physical Review A109, 033722 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Benea-Chelmus, J

    I.-C. Benea-Chelmus, J. Faist, A. Leitenstorfer, A. S. Moskalenko, I. Pupeza, D. V. Seletskiy, and K. L. Vodopy- anov, Electro-optic sampling of classical and quantum light, Optica 12, 546 (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    C. Riek, D. V. Seletskiy, A. S. Moskalenko, J. F. Schmidt, P. Krauspe, S. Eckart, S. Eggert, G. Burkard, and A. Leitenstorfer, Direct sampling of electric-field vacuum fluctuations, Science 350, 420 (2015)

    2015

  54. [62]

    C. Riek, P. Sulzer, M. Seeger, A. S. Moskalenko, G. Burkard, D. V. Seletskiy, and A. Leitenstorfer, Subcycle quantum electrodynamics, Nature 541, 376 (2017)

    2017

  55. [63]

    Benea-Chelmus, F

    I.-C. Benea-Chelmus, F. F. Settembrini, G. Scalari, and J. Faist, Electric field correlation measurements on the electromagnetic vacuum state, Nature 568, 202 (2019)

    2019

  56. [64]

    A. S. Moskalenko, C. Riek, D. V. Seletskiy, G. Burkard, and A. Leitenstorfer, Paraxial theory of direct electro- optic sampling of the quantum vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 263601 (2015)

    2015

  57. [65]

    Kizmann, T

    M. Kizmann, T. L. M. Guedes, D. V. Seletskiy, A. S. Moskalenko, A. Leitenstorfer, and G. Burkard, Subcycle squeezing of light from a time flow perspective, Nat. Phys. 15, 960 (2019). 46

    2019

  58. [66]

    T. L. M. Guedes, M. Kizmann, D. V. Seletskiy, A. Leitenstorfer, G. Burkard, and A. S. Moskalenko, Spectra of ultrabroadband squeezed pulses and the finite-time Unruh-Davies effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 053604 (2019)

    2019

  59. [67]

    Kizmann, A

    M. Kizmann, A. S. Moskalenko, A. Leitenstorfer, G. Burkard, and S. Mukamel, Quantum susceptibilities in time-domain sampling of electric field fluctuations, Laser Photonics Rev. 16, 2100423 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    S. Onoe, T. L. M. Guedes, A. S. Moskalenko, A. Leitenstorfer, G. Burkard, and T. C. Ralph, Realizing a rapidly switched Unruh-DeWitt detector through electro-optic sampling of the electromagnetic vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 105, 056023 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    T. L. M. Guedes, I. Vakulchyk, D. V. Seletskiy, A. Leitenstorfer, A. S. Moskalenko, and G. Burkard, Back action in quantum electro-optic sampling of electromagnetic vacuum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Research 5, 013151 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    Namba, Electro-optical effect of zincblende, J

    S. Namba, Electro-optical effect of zincblende, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 76 (1961)

    1961

  63. [71]

    Gallot and D

    G. Gallot and D. Grischkowsky, Electro-optic detection of terahertz radiation, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 16, 1204 (1999)

    1999

  64. [72]

    Leitenstorfer, S

    A. Leitenstorfer, S. Hunsche, J. Shah, M. C. Nuss, and W. H. Knox, Detectors and sources for ultrabroadband electro-optic sampling: Experiment and theory, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1516 (1999)

    1999

  65. [73]

    Sulzer, K

    P. Sulzer, K. Oguchi, J. Huster, M. Kizmann, T. L. M. Guedes, A. Liehl, C. Beckh, A. S. Moskalenko, G. Burkard, D. V. Seletskiy, and A. Leitenstorfer, Determination of the electric field and its Hilbert transform in femtosecond electro-optic sampling, Phys. Rev. A 101, 033821 (2020)

    2020

  66. [74]

    Kempf, A

    H. Kempf, A. Muraviev, F. Breuning, P. G. Schunemann, R. Tenne, A. Leitenstorfer, and K. Vodopyanov, Direct sampling of femtosecond electric-field waveforms from an optical parametric oscillator, APL Photonics 9, 10.1063/5.0189059 (2024)

    2024 doi

  67. [75]

    Lindel, R

    F. Lindel, R. Bennett, and S. Y. Buhmann, Theory of polaritonic quantum-vacuum detection, Physical Review A 102, 041701 (2020)

    2020

  68. [76]

    Lindel, R

    F. Lindel, R. Bennett, and S. Y. Buhmann, Macroscopic quantum electrodynamics approach to nonlinear optics and application to polaritonic quantum-vacuum detection, Phys. Rev. A 103, 033705 (2021)

    2021

  69. [77]

    Virally, P

    S. Virally, P. Cusson, and D. V. Seletskiy, Enhanced electro-optic sampling with quantum probes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 270504 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    Beckh, P

    C. Beckh, P. Sulzer, N. Fritzsche, C. Riek, and A. Leitenstorfer, Analysis of subcycle electro-optic sampling without background, J Infrared Millim Terahertz Waves 42, 701 (2021)

    2021

  71. [79]

    F. F. Settembrini, F. Lindel, A. M. Herter, S. Y. Buhmann, and J. Faist, Detection of quantum-vacuum field correlations outside the light cone, Nat. Commun. 13, 10.1038/s41467-022-31081-1 (2022)

    2022 doi

  72. [80]

    F. F. Settembrini, A. Herter, and J. Faist, Third order nonlinear correlation of the electromagnetic vacuum at near-infrared frequencies (2023). 47

    2023

  73. [81]

    Lindel, A

    F. Lindel, A. M. Herter, J. Faist, and S. Y. Buhmann, Probing vacuum field fluctuations and source radiation separately in space and time, Physical Review Research 5, 043207 (2023)

    2023

  74. [82]

    Lindel, A

    F. Lindel, A. Herter, V. Gebhart, J. Faist, and S. Y. Buhmann, Entanglement harvesting from electromagnetic quantum fields, Physical Review A 110, 022414 (2024)

    2024

  75. [83]

    Schubert, M

    O. Schubert, M. Hohenleutner, F. Langer, B. Urbanek, C. Lange, U. Huttner, D. Golde, T. Meier, M. Kira, S. W. Koch, and R. Huber, Sub-cycle control of terahertz high-harmonic generation by dynamical bloch oscillations, Nature Photonics 8, 119 (2014)

    2014

  76. [84]

    Langer, M

    F. Langer, M. Hohenleutner, C. P. Schmid, C. Poellmann, P. Nagler, T. Korn, C. Sch¨ uller, M. S. Sherwin, U. Huttner, J. T. Steiner, S. W. Koch, M. Kira, and R. Huber, Lightwave-driven quasiparticle collisions on a subcycle timescale, Nature 533, 225 (2016)

    2016

  77. [85]

    D. A. Kopylov, T. Meier, and P. R. Sharapova, Theory of multimode squeezed light generation in lossy media (2024)

    2024

  78. [86]

    Tziperman, V

    O. Tziperman, V. R. Christiansen, I. Kaminer, and K. Mølmer, Parametric amplification of a quantum pulse, Physical Review A 110, 053712 (2024)

    2024

  79. [87]

    Yurke and J

    B. Yurke and J. S. Denker, Quantum network theory, Physical Review A 29, 1419 (1984)

    1984

  80. [88]

    M. A. Weiss, A. Herbst, J. Schlegel, T. Dannegger, M. Evers, A. Donges, M. Nakajima, A. Leitenstorfer, S. T. B. Goennenwein, U. Nowak, and T. Kurihara, Discovery of ultrafast spontaneous spin switching in an antiferromagnet by femtosecond noise correlation spectroscopy, Nature...

    2023 doi

  81. [89]

    E. H. Moore, On the reciprocal of the general algebraic matrix, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 26, 394 (1920)

    1920

  82. [90]

    Penrose, A generalized inverse for matrices, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 51, 406 (1955)

    R. Penrose, A generalized inverse for matrices, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 51, 406 (1955)

    1955

  83. [91]

    G. Yang, S. Sharma, and A. S. Moskalenko, Electro-optic sampling of the electric-field operator for ultrabroad- band pulses of gaussian quantum light (2025), arXiv:2506.01730 [quant-ph]

    2025

  84. [92]

    R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear optics (Elsevier Science & Technology, 2019)

    2019

  85. [93]

    D. T. F. Marple, Refractive index of ZnSe, ZnTe, and CdTe, J. Appl. Phys. 35, 539 (1964)

    1964

  86. [94]

    Adesso, A

    G. Adesso, A. Serafini, and F. Illuminati, Extremal entanglement and mixedness in continuous variable systems, Physical Review A 70, 022318 (2004)

    2004

  87. [95]

    Adesso and A

    G. Adesso and A. Datta, Quantum versus classical correlations in gaussian states, Physical Review Letters 105, 030501 (2010)

    2010

  88. [96]

    Sperling, A

    J. Sperling, A. Perez-Leija, K. Busch, and C. Silberhorn, Mode-independent quantum entanglement for light, Physical Review A 100, 062129 (2019). 48

    2019

  89. [97]

    C. K. Law, I. A. Walmsley, and J. H. Eberly, Continuous frequency entanglement: Effective finite hilbert space and entropy control, Physical Review Letters 84, 5304 (2000)

    2000

  90. [98]

    Bernstein and W

    D. Bernstein and W. So, Some explicit formulas for the matrix exponential, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 38, 1228 (1993)

    1993

  91. [99]

    D. B. Horoshko, M. I. Kolobov, V. Parigi, and N. Treps, Few-mode squeezing in type-i parametric downconversion by complete group velocity matching, Optics Letters 49, 4078 (2024)

    2024

  92. [100]

    Roman-Rodriguez, B

    V. Roman-Rodriguez, B. Brecht, S. K, C. Silberhorn, N. Treps, E. Diamanti, and V. Parigi, Continuous variable multimode quantum states via symmetric group velocity matching, New Journal of Physics 23, 043012 (2021). 49

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.