Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies

As of 19 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 35 of 35 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2506.11587.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2506.11587 v1

Coverage vector

measured 35 of 35 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:56.300998Z

measured 36 of 36 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00

measured 1 of 1 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-05-12T04:32:21.624429Z

measured 1 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Reference resolution

35 of 35 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy31
unresolved4
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

0
arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Outbound references

Observation ad87b27d-2333-48d7-a54b-db2d72798160 · outbound

This paper cites Use of External Comparators for Health Technology Assessment Submissions Based on Single-Arm Trials.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Use of External Comparators for Health Technology Assessment Submissions Based on Single-Arm Trials

Reference 1

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:08:01.849928Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 1a6497f1-97e7-4f92-aedf-5f0d45489f58 · outbound

This paper cites CO163 The Increasing Use of Population- Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in the NICE Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Submission Process and the Response to These Methods.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies CO163 The Increasing Use of Population- Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in the NICE Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Submission Process and the Response to These Methods

Reference 2

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:08:01.647660Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 3e1e779b-29e9-4354-a501-dc43f3e396ce · outbound

This paper cites Data Standards for Drug and Biological Product Submissions Containing Real-World Data - Guidance for Industry.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Data Standards for Drug and Biological Product Submissions Containing Real-World Data - Guidance for Industry

Reference 3

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:08:01.459404Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 2bf04213-a505-411a-8b1f-a7ca502bb2a9 · outbound

This paper cites Real-World Data: Assessing Registries to Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Drug and Biological Products.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Real-World Data: Assessing Registries to Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Drug and Biological Products

Reference 4

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:08:01.150455Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation f68440ce-2d3d-44a2-9333-c18165a1d20a · outbound

This paper cites Indirect comparisons: Methods and validity.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Indirect comparisons: Methods and validity

Reference 5

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:08:00.822899Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 67b726e2-d859-420f-a563-1c9958f31438 · outbound

This paper cites Guide méthodologique : Choix méthodologiques pour l’évaluation économique à la HAS.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Guide méthodologique : Choix méthodologiques pour l’évaluation économique à la HAS

Reference 6

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:08:00.560036Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation ca845b10-a743-45a4-a949-e502af900bc8 · outbound

This paper cites Guide méthodologique « Etudes en vie réelle pour l’évaluation des médicaments et dispositifs médicaux ».

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Guide méthodologique « Etudes en vie réelle pour l’évaluation des médicaments et dispositifs médicaux »

Reference 7

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:08:00.203840Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 877d7852-c35d-402c-af0c-263e1f7b87b8 · outbound

This paper cites Rapid access to innovative medicinal products while ensuring relevant health technology assessment.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Rapid access to innovative medicinal products while ensuring relevant health technology assessment

Reference 8

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:59.943498Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation c792bf2d-2eca-40a0-8c2f-2ae9e58e7172 · outbound

This paper cites Doctrine de la commission de la transparence (CT) Principes d’évaluation de la CT relatifs aux médicaments en vue de leur accès au remboursement.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Doctrine de la commission de la transparence (CT) Principes d’évaluation de la CT relatifs aux médicaments en vue de leur accès au remboursement

Reference 9

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:59.780726Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 1ed711be-8c6d-409c-843f-2590a425f94f · outbound

This paper cites Guideline on Clinical Trials in Small Populations.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Guideline on Clinical Trials in Small Populations

Reference 10

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:59.609116Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 65a7dbf9-fc82-4257-a271-ab991e03cceb · outbound

This paper cites Guideline on the clinical evaluation of anticancer medicinal products.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Guideline on the clinical evaluation of anticancer medicinal products

Reference 11

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:59.442510Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 1ccd03a0-39ac-473e-9313-5910f3bacec7 · outbound

This paper cites Reflection paper on establishing efficacy based on single-arm trials submitted as pivotal evidence in a marketing authorisation - Considerations on evidence from single-arm trials.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Reflection paper on establishing efficacy based on single-arm trials submitted as pivotal evidence in a marketing authorisation - Considerations on evidence from single-arm trials

Reference 12

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:59.303273Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 02523119-cd37-4c6f-a15b-b096ff65a471 · outbound

This paper cites Methods Guideline-D4.3.2-Methodological-Guideline-on-Direct-and-indirect- comparisons-V1.0.pdf.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Methods Guideline-D4.3.2-Methodological-Guideline-on-Direct-and-indirect- comparisons-V1.0.pdf

Reference 13

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:59.138462Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation c9c66fd2-d598-43c8-8769-cc7b5ae4ce42 · outbound

This paper cites EUnetHTA 21 - Individual Practical Guideline Document D4.3.1: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COMPARISONS [Internet].

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies EUnetHTA 21 - Individual Practical Guideline Document D4.3.1: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COMPARISONS [Internet]

Reference 14

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:58.968045Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation b16ea342-387c-42d2-bb02-bc5ed7d8f599 · outbound

This paper cites Practical Guideline for Quantitative Evidence Synthesis: Direct and Indirect Comparisons.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Practical Guideline for Quantitative Evidence Synthesis: Direct and Indirect Comparisons

Reference 15

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:54.651849Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 3af03397-9a87-4de4-81d6-1a0854e580d5 · outbound

This paper cites Methodological Guideline for Quantitative Evidence Synthesis: Direct and Indirect Comparisons.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Methodological Guideline for Quantitative Evidence Synthesis: Direct and Indirect Comparisons

Reference 16

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:54.757507Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 9c54118e-b37c-4998-9e02-4bec06e68d4e · outbound

This paper cites Use of indirect and mixed treatment comparisons for technology assessment.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Use of indirect and mixed treatment comparisons for technology assessment

Reference 17

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:58.797620Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 85fc8dbb-9509-423f-ab28-a5e58a17ae80 · outbound

This paper cites Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis

Reference 18

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:58.670872Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation e34f28bc-06d1-4e8e-9492-adfc6e5f0746 · outbound

This paper cites Evidence Synthesis of Treatment Efficacy in Decision Making: A Reviewer’s Checklist.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Evidence Synthesis of Treatment Efficacy in Decision Making: A Reviewer’s Checklist

Reference 19

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:58.574226Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 8ff3fac2-7bdc-43e6-a32d-099c52d92a14 · outbound

This paper cites NICE DSU Technical Support Document 3: Heterogeneity: subgroups, meta-regression,bias and bias-adjustment.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies NICE DSU Technical Support Document 3: Heterogeneity: subgroups, meta-regression,bias and bias-adjustment

Reference 20

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:58.472106Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation bf1ef224-e7f1-4601-af02-2b50c86a8045 · outbound

This paper cites Guide to the methods of technology appraisal.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Guide to the methods of technology appraisal

Reference 21

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:58.340801Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation cfa1fe55-b997-4504-8085-22034927339a · outbound

This paper cites NICE DSU Technical Support Document 4: Inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomised controlled trials.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies NICE DSU Technical Support Document 4: Inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomised controlled trials

Reference 22

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:58.208488Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation e3c43813-2906-41c5-8262-133af11c196c · outbound

This paper cites Appendix K: Network meta-analysis reporting standards | Tools and resources | Developing NICE guidelines: the manual | Guidance | NICE.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Appendix K: Network meta-analysis reporting standards | Tools and resources | Developing NICE guidelines: the manual | Guidance | NICE

Reference 23

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:58.088605Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation d67c2e67-a593-47f5-ba26-cde4dec31da4 · outbound

This paper cites NICE DSU Technical Support Document 2 : A general linear modelling framework for pair-wise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies NICE DSU Technical Support Document 2 : A general linear modelling framework for pair-wise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Reference 24

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:57.966026Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation ed64954f-ba9b-49dc-b5d9-fbddd6f5c091 · outbound

This paper cites Assessing evidence inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Assessing evidence inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons

Reference 25

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:57.857353Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 858b8ecd-b074-4100-b99d-f8d13afb1bf0 · outbound

This paper cites Methods for Population- Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Health Technology Appraisal.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Methods for Population- Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Health Technology Appraisal

Reference 26

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:57.769138Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 7203368e-e5f8-4916-a93b-eae8f17a878b · outbound

This paper cites Population Adjustment Methods for Indirect Comparisons: A Review of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Population Adjustment Methods for Indirect Comparisons: A Review of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals

Reference 27

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:57.664497Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 29a84bc1-5d7d-4426-94f4-3f135879e39f · outbound

This paper cites real-world evidence framework.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies real-world evidence framework

Reference 28

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:57.544956Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 0cd22b82-65b2-466c-bada-4feaa63bdbd5 · outbound

This paper cites Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials to Evaluate the Safety of Human Drugs or Biological Products Guidance for Industry.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials to Evaluate the Safety of Human Drugs or Biological Products Guidance for Industry

Reference 29

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:57.414933Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 25556a6c-d866-467e-ad79-5fcec91da5b0 · outbound

This paper cites Considerations for the Design and Conduct of Externally Controlled Trials for Drug and Biological Products (Draft guidance).

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Considerations for the Design and Conduct of Externally Controlled Trials for Drug and Biological Products (Draft guidance)

Reference 30

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:57.308103Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation fa000288-cd3c-4502-8461-8eac0a603ee0 · outbound

This paper cites Conducting indirect- treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Conducting indirect- treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2

Reference 31

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:57.139108Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 01921fda-5c87-4168-b43f-b793fc06af3c · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Unresolved cited work

Reference 32

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:57.008018Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 62aa4781-d134-45b0-b162-d5076a7d2ca7 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Unresolved cited work

Reference 33

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:56.846247Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation c4c62e90-aeeb-49d8-9ced-91964bbedf6a · outbound

This paper cites ISPOR | International Society For Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies ISPOR | International Society For Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research

Reference 34

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:56.616408Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation c7dac18f-7dec-4519-8a2a-7a95264b5c71 · outbound

This paper cites Yes”,”No.

Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies Yes”,”No

Reference 35

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T04:07:56.468739Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Pith citing papers

Observation 4e04c44c-de76-40d0-8fbd-cfc60af2f79e · inbound

Indirect Comparisons For Health Technology Assessment: A Practical Methodological Guide And Tips With Insights From The French Transparency Commission cites this paper.

Indirect Comparisons For Health Technology Assessment: A Practical Methodological Guide And Tips With Insights From The French Transparency Commission Methodological Advances and Challenges in Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of International Guidelines and HAS TC Case Studies

Reference 8

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-12T04:36:21.671457Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.