Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 minor 1 cited by

The Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array Local Group L-band Survey (LGLBS)

T0 review · 0 major / 10 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A new VLA+GBT survey images atomic hydrogen in six Local Group galaxies at about 120 pc resolution and releases the data publicly.

desk verdict Solid data-release paper for LGLBS: the CD+GBT HI cubes, QA framework, and honest caveats support the central claims; the 'highest quality' header is broader than what is demonstrated here. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11792 v1 pith:IISTH2WF submitted 2025-06-13 astro-ph.GA

Eric W. Koch , Adam K. Leroy , Erik W. Rosolowsky , Laura Chomiuk , Julianne J. Dalcanton , Nickolas M. Pingel , Sumit K. Sarbadhicary , Snežana Stanimirović
show 40 more authors
Fabian Walter Haylee N. Archer Alberto D. Bolatto Michael P. Busch Hongxing Chen Ryan Chown Harrisen Corbould Serena A. Cronin Jeremy Darling Thomas Do Jennifer Donovan Meyer Cosima Eibensteiner Deidre Hunter Rémy Indebetouw Preshanth Jagannathan Amanda A. Kepley Chang-Goo Kim Shin-Jeong Kim Timea O. Kovacs Joshua Marvil Eric J. Murphy Claire E. Murray Jürgen Ott D.J. Pisano Mary Putman Daniel R. Rybarczyk Julia Roman-Duval Karin Sandstrom Eva Schinnerer Evan D. Skillman Adam Smercina Ioana Stelea Jay Strader Jiayi Sun Devisree Tallapaneni Elizabeth Tarantino Vicente Villanueva Daniel R. Weisz Thomas G. Williams Tony Wong
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords 21-cmlineradiocontinuumLocalGroupgalaxiesneutralhydrogenVeryLargeArrayGreenBankTelescopeshort-spacingcorrectioninterstellarmedium
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents the Local Group L-Band Survey (LGLBS), built on the claim that it produces the highest-quality 21-cm and 1–2 GHz radio continuum images to date of the six star-forming Local Group galaxies visible to the VLA. By combining all four VLA array configurations with single-dish Green Bank Telescope data, the survey reaches $\sim$10–20 pc resolution for the 21-cm line and $\sim$5–10 pc for the continuum at column-density sensitivities near $10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$. The paper releases the first wide-field HI cubes (C+D configurations combined with GBT data) for M31, M33, IC10, IC1613, NGC6822, and WLM, reaching about 20 arcsec ($\approx$120 pc) resolution with 5$\sigma$ column-density limits of $1.4\text{--}4.1\times10^{19}$ cm$^{-2}$ per 10 km s$^{-1}$. If these products hold up, they give external galaxies a resolved view of cold atomic clouds, turbulence, and stellar feedback comparable to what is currently possible only in the Milky Way and Magellanic Clouds.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the survey's spatial-frequency coverage: all four VLA configurations (A, B, C, and D) are combined with single-dish Green Bank Telescope cubes by short-spacing correction, the procedure that adds single-dish data to interferometric data to recover emission on angular scales larger than the interferometer can see. The relative flux scale between the two telescopes is set by fitting the distribution of flux ratios on the angular scales sampled by both (the compact C and D configurations), and the calibrated cubes are then merged with feathering. Mosaics are designed for uniform noise, imaging uses a wide-field spectral-line pipeline with multi-scale cleaning and signal masks, and a distributed quality-assurance system manually flags more than 1,800 hours of observations. Together these choices produce the claimed combination of sensitivity and resolution.

What would settle it

Compare the combined VLA+GBT integrated HI maps of WLM or IC1613, smoothed to the roughly 9-arcmin single-dish beam, against the single-dish-only maps: if the fitted flux-scaling factors are wrong, the difference map will show a systematic bowl-shaped residual that grows with the factor's deviation from unity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

LGLBS claims to deliver the highest-quality 21-cm and 1–2 GHz radio continuum imaging to date for the six VLA-accessible, star-forming Local Group galaxies: M31, M33, IC10, IC1613, NGC6822, and WLM. The central demonstration is that a four-configuration VLA campaign combined with Green Bank Telescope short-spacing data recovers atomic gas structure across all angular scales, reaching $<5''$ ($10\text{--}20$ pc) resolution for the 21-cm line and $<2''$ ($5\text{--}10$ pc) for the continuum, with 0.4 km s$^{-1}$ velocity resolution. The released CD+GBT HI cubes reach about 20 arcsec ($\approx$120 pc) resolution and 5$\sigma$ column-density sensitivities of $1.4\text{--}4.1\times10^{19}$ cm$^{-2}$ over 10 km s$^{-1}$, and the maps trace HI down to individual clouds of roughly $2\text{--}5\times10^{3}$ solar masses. The same observations simultaneously record 1–2 GHz polarized continuum, four OH lines, and radio recombination lines, and the paper reports total HI masses for all six targets that generally agree with—and in several cases improve on—previous single-dish and interferometric measurements.

Load-bearing premise

The correction factors that put the single-dish data on the interferometer's flux scale are measured using only the compact array configurations, and the same factors are assumed to apply when the sharper extended configurations are added to make the full-resolution cubes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The released 120-pc cubes detect individual atomic clouds of a few thousand solar masses, reaching column densities below the traditional edge of the HI disk and into the regime predicted for photodissociation regions.
  • The 0.4 km s$^{-1}$ velocity resolution resolves the line profiles of cold, roughly 100 K gas, allowing separate kinematic components to be identified along single sight lines.
  • Because the same observations record the full 1–2 GHz band, the 5–10 pc continuum images will resolve most supernova remnants and HII regions in these galaxies, including embedded regions missed by optical surveys.
  • The HI mass comparisons reported in the paper show that the short-spacing correction recovers extended emission missed by earlier interferometric surveys, most dramatically for IC1613, where the measured mass is 59% larger than an earlier value.
  • The survey is positioned as a preview of future SKA and ngVLA 21-cm capabilities, with full-resolution ABCD and continuum products to follow in companion papers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the paper does not carry out is to combine the released HI cubes with existing CO and dust maps to measure the atomic-to-molecular transition and the CO-dark molecular gas fraction across the sample's roughly 1.5 dex metallicity range; the 120-pc resolution matches the size scale of individual molecular clouds.
  • The 21-cm absorption detection already reported for NGC6822 could be extended to the whole sample wherever bright background continuum sources exist, yielding spin temperatures and cold-gas fractions for galaxies beyond the Magellanic Clouds; this would directly test the cold-cloud abundance questions the survey motivates.
  • The manual flagging labels produced during quality assurance could be used as training data for automated radio-frequency-interference identification, a need the paper notes for next-generation instruments; a concrete test would be to hold out a subset of observing tracks and see whether an automated classifier reproduces the human flags.
  • If the assumed configuration-independent flux scaling holds, the upcoming ABCD release should provide a nearly continuous set of beam sizes from a few to tens of arcseconds from a single data set; comparing the final ABCD total fluxes to the single-dish-only masses reported in the paper would check that assumption directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 10 minor

Summary. This paper presents the Local Group L-Band Survey (LGLBS), a VLA plus GBT program targeting six star-forming Local Group galaxies. It describes the scientific motivation, sample selection, spectral setup, mosaic design, data reduction and quality assurance procedures, and it releases the first wide-field 21-cm HI cubes made from the compact C+D configurations combined with GBT short-spacing data. The authors quantify the achieved sensitivity using IC10 imaging tests, report flagging statistics from 337 tracks, measure HI masses, and compare them with previous surveys. They also publicly release the ReductionPipeline and QAPlotter software packages and the CANFAR data products.

Significance. If the released products are as described, LGLBS occupies a valuable niche in the HI survey landscape: roughly 120 pc physical resolution with 5-sigma column-density sensitivities of 1.4-4.1e19 cm^-2 over 10 km/s for six well-studied Local Group galaxies. The paper's quantitative quality assurance is a clear strength, including the IC10 sensitivity tests in Figure 9, the flagging statistics in Section 5.2.3, and the cross-checks of total HI masses against independent measurements in Section 6. The public release of the reduction and QA software and of the CD+GBT data cubes is also commendable and will make the survey reproducible and immediately usable by the community.

minor comments (10)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence claiming "the highest quality 21-cm and 1-2 GHz radio continuum images to date" is not yet supported for the continuum part: this paper presents no continuum images, continuum sensitivity measurements, or comparisons to prior continuum surveys, and the continuum products are explicitly deferred to Sarbadhicary et al. (in preparation). Please qualify the continuum claim, for example by stating that the survey is designed to produce such images or that they will be presented in companion papers.
  2. [Abstract and Section 6] The abstract's statement of "angular resolutions of <5 arcsec for the 21-cm line" refers to the future ABCD products, whereas the currently released CD+GBT cubes have synthesized beams of 27-48 arcsec (Table 5). Add a sentence distinguishing the released products from the future high-resolution products so readers do not expect 5 arcsec cubes in the current release.
  3. [Table 1, note a] The note contains unit typos: "0.7 kpc to IC10" and "0.7 kpc to IC1613" should read "0.7 Mpc", and "1.0 to kpc to WLM" should read "1.0 Mpc to WLM".
  4. [Section 5.1.2] The phrase "the frequency range the we excluded" should read "the frequency range that we excluded".
  5. [Section 4.2] The phrase "evenuvcoverage" should read "even uv coverage" with a space.
  6. [References] Leroy et al. (2019a) and Leroy et al. (2019b) are listed with identical bibliographic data (ApJS 244, 24), and the same appears true for Koch et al. (2021a) and (2021b). If each pair refers to the same paper, please consolidate the duplicate entries and citations.
  7. [Section 5.2.2 and Section 7] Section 5.2.2 states that 60 M31 A-configuration tracks are still undergoing QA iteration, while Section 7 says that more than 430 tracks have been calibrated and manually quality assured; please clarify whether the 60 tracks are included in the 430 or are additional.
  8. [Section 6, M31 paragraph] The measured M31 HI mass of 5.7e9 solar masses is 30% larger than the Chemin et al. (2009) value even though the LGLBS field does not cover the full extended disk; a sentence explaining this offset (e.g., distance or calibration differences) would help readers interpret the comparison.
  9. [Appendix A] The GBT re-reduction description covers IC10, IC1613, NGC6822, and WLM, but M31 and M33 use GBT data from Lockman et al. (2012) and Putman et al. (2009); please state explicitly whether those cubes are re-reduced or used as-is, for reproducibility.
  10. [Table 5] For M33, the VLA+GBT and GBT-only masses are identical (2.0e9 solar masses) despite the 1.10 flux scaling factor in Table 6; please state whether this equality is a coincidence or an artifact of rounding.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: LGLBS is an observational data paper whose central claims are measured sensitivities, resolutions, and released data products, not derivations from fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claims concern the quality, resolution, and sensitivity of newly released HI data products. These are empirical quantities measured from synthesized beams and rms noise in signal-free channels (Section 5.4, Table 5), with no parameter fitted to the claimed result. The VLA-to-GBT flux scaling factors in Appendix B are standard relative-calibration factors derived from uv-overlap between VLA C/D and GBT; they are calibration steps, not theory inputs, and the resulting masses are checked against independent published values (e.g., M33 within 3% of Putman et al. 2009; IC10 agrees with LITTLE THINGS). Self-citations to pilot projects (Koch et al. 2018b, 2021a) are archival data incorporated transparently, with the paper explicitly documenting differences such as the revised M33 flux ratio. The stated caveat that C/D-derived scaling factors are applied to future A/B combinations is an extrapolation assumption, explicitly acknowledged by the authors, and does not affect the released CD+GBT products. No prediction or derivation reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As an observational survey and data-release paper, the ledger consists of calibration and distance assumptions rather than theoretical free parameters. The main fitted quantities are the per-galaxy VLA-to-GBT flux scaling factors, which directly affect the released HI masses. The adopted distances and standard ISM assumptions are drawn from the cited literature.

free parameters (6)
  • VLA-to-GBT flux scaling factor (M31) = 1.00
    Fitted to VLA C/D and GBT flux ratios (Appendix B, Table 6); applied to GBT cube before feathering.
  • VLA-to-GBT flux scaling factor (M33) = 1.10
    Fitted to VLA C/D and GBT flux ratios (Appendix B, Table 6); applied to GBT cube before feathering.
  • VLA-to-GBT flux scaling factor (NGC6822) = 0.92
    Fitted to VLA C/D and GBT flux ratios (Appendix B, Table 6); applied to GBT cube before feathering.
  • VLA-to-GBT flux scaling factor (IC10) = 0.96
    Fitted to VLA C/D and GBT flux ratios (Appendix B, Table 6); applied to GBT cube before feathering.
  • VLA-to-GBT flux scaling factor (IC1613) = 0.89
    Fitted to VLA C/D and GBT flux ratios (Appendix B, Table 6); applied to GBT cube before feathering.
  • VLA-to-GBT flux scaling factor (WLM) = 1.14
    Fitted to VLA C/D and GBT flux ratios (Appendix B, Table 6); applied to GBT cube before feathering.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Adopted distances to the six galaxies (Table 1) are correct.
    Physical resolutions (e.g., 10-20 pc for HI) and HI masses scale with distance; IC10's distance has the largest uncertainty.
  • domain assumption The 21-cm HI emission is optically thin, so integrated intensity converts directly to HI column density and mass.
    Used to compute HI masses in Section 6 and Table 5; standard for external galaxies but an assumption.
  • domain assumption VLA-to-GBT flux scaling factors derived from C/D configurations apply to all configuration combinations.
    Stated in Appendix B; if false, the short-spacing correction for future ABCD products would be biased.
  • domain assumption The CloudClean local pixel-wise infilling correctly models and removes the Galactic HI foreground toward NGC6822.
    Appendix C; an incorrect foreground model would bias the NGC6822-only cube and its HI mass.
  • domain assumption The absolute VLA flux calibration follows Perley and Butler (2017) with an assumed 5% systematic uncertainty.
    Assumed in the flux scaling and mass uncertainty budget (Table 5).
  • domain assumption The GBT beam FWHM (9.1 arcmin) and gain (1.86 K/Jy) used to grid the single-dish data are accurate.
    Appendix A; errors would affect the absolute scale of the single-dish maps before feathering.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array Local Group L-band Survey (LGLBS)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IISTH2WF

@misc{pith2026250611792,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array Local Group L-band Survey (LGLBS)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IISTH2WF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11792}
}
abstract

We present the Local Group L-Band Survey (LGLBS), a Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA) survey producing the highest quality 21-cm and 1-2 GHz radio continuum images to date for the six VLA-accessible, star-forming, Local Group galaxies. Leveraging the VLA's spectral multiplexing power, we simultaneously survey the 21-cm line at high 0.4 km/s velocity resolution, the 1-2 GHz polarized continuum, and four OH lines. For the massive spiral M31, the dwarf spiral M33, and the dwarf irregular galaxies NGC6822, IC10, IC1613, and the Wolf-Lundmark-Melotte Galaxy (WLM), we use all four VLA configurations and the Green Bank Telescope to reach angular resolutions of $< 5''$ ($10{-}20$~pc) for the 21-cm line with $<10^{20}$~cm$^{-2}$ column density sensitivity, and even sharper views ($< 2''$; $5{-}10$~pc) of the continuum. Targeting these nearby galaxies ($D\lesssim1$ Mpc) reveals a sharp, resolved view of the atomic gas, including 21-cm absorption, and continuum emission from supernova remnants and HII regions. These datasets can be used to test theories of the abundance and formation of cold clouds, the driving and dissipation of interstellar turbulence, and the impact of feedback from massive stars and supernovae. Here, we describe the survey design and execution, scientific motivation, data processing, and quality assurance. We provide a first look at and publicly release the wide-field 21-cm HI data products for M31, M33, and four dwarf irregular targets in the survey, which represent some of the highest physical resolution 21-cm observations of any external galaxies beyond the LMC and SMC.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.11792 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Three-color optical images showing the six northern hemisphere local galaxies ordered by decreasing stellar mass (image credits: DESI Legacy Survey, Abbott et al. 2018; Morganson et al. 2018; Flaugher et al. 2015) overlaid with the VLA pointings. The scale bars on the lower right corners indicate about one radius (for M31 and M33) and a half of the radius (for IC10, NGC6822, IC1613, and WLM) of one VLA pointing. The… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Star formation rate versus stellar mass of the LGLBS targets, the SMC, LMC, and Milky Way relative to the local galaxy population (d < 50 Mpc) from z0MGS (an archival project combining WISE and GALEX images of nearby galaxies that is complete to M⋆ > 109 M⊙; Leroy et al. 2019b). Right: H I mass versus distance for Local Group galaxies with H I detections from the sample compiled in Putman et al. (2021). The LG… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. LGLBS H I column density sensitivity and physical resolution relative to comparable nearby galaxy and Local Group surveys. The LGLBS points show the range of sensitivity and resolution within the target velocity resolution, and the labels indicate the combination of VLA configurations combined to reach these targets. The dashed gray lines indicate constant 5σ H I mass sensitivity. LGLBS fills an important gap in the… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: VLA correlator setup used for LGLBS (VLA Project ID 20A-346). The black, gray, and blue regions represent individual spectral windows (SPWs) used in the LGLBS setup. The primary LGLBS data products are the H I and 4 OH lines (black regions), and the Stokes I L-band con…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example of an interactive plot used to quality assure LGLBS visibility data. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A subset of quicklook imaging for a single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of the percent of flagged data split by SPW over 337 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Measured H I intensity (left), column density (center), and mass per beam sensitivity (right) using observations of our central IC10 pointing. Each color corresponds to a different array configuration or combination of array configurations (see legend). The points conn…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: H I peak brightness temperature maps for combined CD and GBT imaging over the full LGLBS field of view for each target. The images show the extent of emission and complex morphology visible in the bright H I at high ∼ 100 pc resolution. data releases of the high resol…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: H I integrated intensity maps of the four LGLBS dwarf galaxy targets at their native angular resolution. These maps show the wide-field extent combining CD configuration and GBT observations. The morphology of the H I varies between these four galaxies, and we highlig…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: H I centroid velocity maps of the four LGLBS dwarf galaxies at a common physical resolution of 120 pc. The colormaps are centered at the galaxy’s systemic velocity indicated by the vertical black line in each colorbar and extend to ±Vmax (the maximum rotation velocity…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: H I centroid velocity maps of M31 and M33 at a common physical resolution of 120 pc. The colormaps are centered at the galaxy’s systemic velocity indicated by the vertical black line in each colorbar and extend to ±Vmax (the maximum rotation velocity). (https://doi.or…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: H I line width maps of the four LGLBS dwarf galaxies, as measured with the effective width, defined as σ = IHI/ √ 2π Tpeak. Each map is shown at a common physical resolution of 120 pc. Regions with recent massive star formation in NGC6822 and IC10 tend to show larger …
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: H I line width maps of M31 and M33, as measured with the effective width, defined as σ = IHI/ √ 2π Tpeak. Each map is shown at a common physical resolution of 120 pc. Both M31 and M33 have regions of larger line widths relative to the dwarf galaxies ( [PITH_FULL_IMAG…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Foreground Galactic H I separation in NGC6822 using CloudClean.jl (Saydjari & Finkbeiner 2022b). We show the original GBT cube (left column), the Galactic H I only model produced with CloudClean.jl (center column), and the NGC6822 only cube from subtracting the Galact…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Modeling Cosmic Ray Electron Spectra and Synchrotron Emission in the Multiphase ISM

    astro-ph.HE 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A post-processed MHD simulation of a solar-neighborhood galactic disk reproduces the observed steepening of the cosmic-ray electron spectrum from 1-100 GeV and shows that radio spectral indices can recover the electro...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

189 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    a t Heidelberg, Interdisziplin\

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Abbott , T. M. C., Abdalla , F. B., Allam , S., et al. 2018, , 239, 18, 10.3847/1538-4365/aae9f0

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aae9f0 2018

  5. [5]

    J., Le Bourlot , J., Lequeux , J., Pineau des Forets , G., & Roueff , E

    Allen , R. J., Le Bourlot , J., Lequeux , J., Pineau des Forets , G., & Roueff , E. 1995, , 444, 157, 10.1086/175590

    doi:10.1086/175590 1995

  6. [6]

    D., Bania , T

    Anderson , L. D., Bania , T. M., Balser , D. S., et al. 2014, , 212, 1, 10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/1

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/1 2014

  7. [7]

    J., Koch , E

    Anna-Thomas , R., Law , C. J., Koch , E. W., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.02947, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.02947

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.02947 2025

  8. [8]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

Show all 189 references
  1. [9]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    2011, , 142, 139, 10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/139

    Azimlu , M., Marciniak , R., & Barmby , P. 2011, , 142, 139, 10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/139

    2011 doi

  4. [12]

    2015, , 24, 4, 10.1007/s00159-015-0084-4

    Beck , R. 2015, , 24, 4, 10.1007/s00159-015-0084-4

    2015 doi

  5. [13]

    M., & Hoernes , P

    Beck , R., Berkhuijsen , E. M., & Hoernes , P. 1998, , 129, 329, 10.1051/aas:1998187

    1998 doi

  6. [14]

    1989, , 222, 58

    Beck , R., Loiseau , N., Hummel , E., et al. 1989, , 222, 58

    1989

  7. [15]

    G., & V \"o lk , H

    Berezhko , E. G., & V \"o lk , H. J. 2004, , 427, 525, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041111

    2004 doi

  8. [17]

    2016, , 595, A32, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629143

    Beuther , H., Bihr , S., Rugel , M., et al. 2016, , 595, A32, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629143

    2016 doi

  9. [18]

    G., Joncas , G., et al

    Blagrave , K., Martin , P. G., Joncas , G., et al. 2017, , 834, 126, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/126

    2017 doi

  10. [19]

    1990 a , , 72, 761, 10.1086/191432

    Braun , R. 1990 a , , 72, 761, 10.1086/191432

    1990 doi

  11. [20]

    1990 b , , 72, 755, 10.1086/191431

    ---. 1990 b , , 72, 755, 10.1086/191431

    1990 doi

  12. [21]

    A., Keane , E., & Wagg , J

    Braun , R., Bourke , T., Green , J. A., Keane , E., & Wagg , J. 2015, in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), 174, 10.22323/1.215.0174

    2015 doi

  13. [22]

    Braun , R., & Thilker , D. A. 2004, , 417, 421, 10.1051/0004-6361:20034423

    2004 doi

  14. [23]

    A., Walterbos , R

    Braun , R., Thilker , D. A., Walterbos , R. A. M., & Corbelli , E. 2009, , 695, 937, 10.1088/0004-637X/695/2/937

    2009 doi

  15. [24]

    A., Gieren , W., Pietrzy \'n ski , G., & Kudritzki , R.-P

    Bresolin , F., Urbaneja , M. A., Gieren , W., Pietrzy \'n ski , G., & Kudritzki , R.-P. 2007, , 671, 2028, 10.1086/522571

    2007 doi

  16. [25]

    Brinks , E., & Shane , W. W. 1984, , 55, 179

    1984

  17. [26]

    L., Lockman , F

    Brown , R. L., Lockman , F. J., & Knapp , G. R. 1978, , 16, 445, 10.1146/annurev.aa.16.090178.002305

    1978

  18. [27]

    Busch , M. P. 2024, , 967, 148, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3af6

    2024 doi

  19. [28]

    L., & Walter , F

    Carilli , C. L., & Walter , F. 2013, , 51, 105, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140953

    2013 doi

  20. [29]

    2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    CASA Team , Bean , B., Bhatnagar , S., et al. 2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    2022 doi

  21. [30]

    2009, , 705, 1395, 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1395

    Chemin , L., Carignan , C., & Foster , T. 2009, , 705, 1395, 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1395

    2009 doi

  22. [31]

    M., Chastenet , J., et al

    Chiang , I.-D., Sandstrom , K. M., Chastenet , J., et al. 2021, , 907, 29, 10.3847/1538-4357/abceb6

    2021 doi

  23. [32]

    Chomiuk , L., & Wilcots , E. M. 2009, , 703, 370, 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/370

    2009 doi

  24. [33]

    H., Kenney , J

    Chung , A., van Gorkom , J. H., Kenney , J. D. P., Crowl , H., & Vollmer , B. 2009, , 138, 1741, 10.1088/0004-6256/138/6/1741

    2009 doi

  25. [34]

    Condon , J. J. 1992, , 30, 575, 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.003043

    1992

  26. [36]

    2010, , 511, A89, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913297

    Corbelli , E., Lorenzoni , S., Walterbos , R., Braun , R., & Thilker , D. 2010, , 511, A89, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913297

    2010 doi

  27. [37]

    2000, , 311, 441, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03075.x

    Corbelli , E., & Salucci , P. 2000, , 311, 441, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03075.x

    2000

  28. [38]

    Corbelli , E., & Schneider , S. E. 1997, , 479, 244, 10.1086/303849

    1997 doi

  29. [39]

    A., Sandstrom , K., et al

    Cosens , M., Wright , S. A., Sandstrom , K., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.09020, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.09020

    2024 doi arXiv

  30. [40]

    J., Williams , B

    Dalcanton , J. J., Williams , B. F., Melbourne , J. L., et al. 2012, , 198, 6, 10.1088/0067-0049/198/1/6

    2012 doi

  31. [41]

    M., Koper , E., Israel , F

    Dame , T. M., Koper , E., Israel , F. P., & Thaddeus , P. 1993, , 418, 730, 10.1086/173430

    1993 doi

  32. [42]

    R., Breen , S

    Dawson , J. R., Breen , S. L., & Gaskap-Oh Team . 2024, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 380, Cosmic Masers: Proper Motion Toward the Next-Generation Large Projects, ed. T. Hirota , H. Imai , K. Menten , & Y. Pihlstr \"o m , 486--490, 10.1017/S1743921323002405

    2024 doi

  33. [43]

    de Blok , W. J. G., & Walter , F. 2006, , 131, 343, 10.1086/497829

    2006 doi

  34. [44]

    de Blok , W. J. G., Healy , J., Maccagni , F. M., et al. 2024, , 688, A109, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348297

    2024 doi

  35. [45]

    2018, , 479, 5035, 10.1093/mnras/sty1614

    Dell'Agli , F., Di Criscienzo , M., Ventura , P., et al. 2018, , 479, 5035, 10.1093/mnras/sty1614

    2018 doi

  36. [46]

    R., & van der Hulst , J

    Deul , E. R., & van der Hulst , J. M. 1987, , 67, 509

    1987

  37. [47]

    R., Dodorico , S., & Silverman , A

    Dickel , J. R., Dodorico , S., & Silverman , A. 1985, , 90, 414, 10.1086/113747

    1985 doi

  38. [48]

    M., McClure-Griffiths , N., Gibson , S

    Dickey , J. M., McClure-Griffiths , N., Gibson , S. J., et al. 2013, , 30, e003, 10.1017/pasa.2012.003

    2013 doi

  39. [49]

    L., Krumholz , M

    Dobbs , C. L., Krumholz , M. R., Ballesteros-Paredes , J., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther , R. S. Klessen , C. P. Dullemond , & T. Henning , 3--26, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch001

    2014 doi

  40. [50]

    T., Aniano , G., Krause , O., et al

    Draine , B. T., Aniano , G., Krause , O., et al. 2014, , 780, 172, 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/172

    2014 doi

  41. [51]

    G., Palou s , J., & Ehlerov \'a , S

    Elmegreen , B. G., Palou s , J., & Ehlerov \'a , S. 2002, , 334, 693, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05559.x

    2002

  42. [52]

    G., & Scalo , J

    Elmegreen , B. G., & Scalo , J. 2004, , 42, 211, 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094859

    2004 arXiv

  43. [53]

    I., & Purcell , E

    Ewen , H. I., & Purcell , E. M. 1951, , 168, 356, 10.1038/168356a0

    1951 doi

  44. [54]

    Ferri \`e re , K. M. 2001, Reviews of Modern Physics, 73, 1031, 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.1031

    2001 doi

  45. [55]

    Field , G. B. 1958, Proceedings of the IRE, 46, 240, 10.1109/JRPROC.1958.286741

    1958

  46. [56]

    T., Honscheid , K., et al

    Flaugher , B., Diehl , H. T., Honscheid , K., et al. 2015, , 150, 150, 10.1088/0004-6256/150/5/150

    2015 doi

  47. [57]

    2017, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol

    Fraternali , F. 2017, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 430, Gas Accretion onto Galaxies, ed. A. Fox & R. Dav \'e , 323, 10.1007/978-3-319-52512-9_14

    2017 doi

  48. [58]

    Gerbrandt , S. A. N., McConnachie , A. W., & Irwin , M. 2015, , 454, 1000, 10.1093/mnras/stv2029

    2015 doi

  49. [59]

    2014, image\_registration v0.2.1 , v0.2.1, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.12528

    Ginsburg , A., Giessel , A., & Chef , B. 2014, image\_registration v0.2.1 , v0.2.1, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.12528

    2014 doi

  50. [60]

    2019, radio-astro-tools/spectral-cube: Release v0.4.5 , v0.4.5, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3558614

    Ginsburg , A., Koch , E., Robitaille , T., et al. 2019, radio-astro-tools/spectral-cube: Release v0.4.5 , v0.4.5, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3558614

    2019 doi

  51. [61]

    J., et al

    Gratier , P., Braine , J., Rodriguez-Fernandez , N. J., et al. 2010 a , , 512, A68, 10.1051/0004-6361/200911722

    2010 doi

  52. [62]

    2010 b , , 522, A3, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014441

    ---. 2010 b , , 522, A3, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014441

    2010 doi

  53. [63]

    D., Howe, D

    Gray, M. D., Howe, D. A., & Lewis, B. M. 2005, , 364, 783, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09591.x

    2005

  54. [64]

    E., Heitsch , F., et al

    Hacar , A., Clark , S. E., Heitsch , F., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 153, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09562

    2023 doi arXiv

  55. [65]

    2011, , 526, A118, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015938

    Heald , G., J \'o zsa , G., Serra , P., et al. 2011, , 526, A118, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015938

    2011 doi

  56. [66]

    Heiles , C., & Troland , T. H. 2003, , 586, 1067, 10.1086/367828

    2003 doi

  57. [67]

    A., Afonso , C., & Dolphin , A

    Holtzman , J. A., Afonso , C., & Dolphin , A. 2006, , 166, 534, 10.1086/507074

    2006 doi

  58. [68]

    K., Annibali , F., Cuillandre , J

    Hunt , L. K., Annibali , F., Cuillandre , J. C., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.13499, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.13499

    2024 doi

  59. [69]

    Hunter , D. A. 2001, , 559, 225, 10.1086/322399

    2001 doi

  60. [70]

    A., Elmegreen , B

    Hunter , D. A., Elmegreen , B. G., & Madden , S. C. 2024, , 62, 113, 10.1146/annurev-astro-052722-104109

    2024 doi

  61. [71]

    A., Zahedy , F., Bowsher , E

    Hunter , D. A., Zahedy , F., Bowsher , E. C., et al. 2011, , 142, 173, 10.1088/0004-6256/142/5/173

    2011 doi

  62. [73]

    2012 b , , 144, 134, 10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/134

    ---. 2012 b , , 144, 134, 10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/134

    2012 doi

  63. [74]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  64. [75]

    Ianjamasimanana , R., Namumba , B., Ramaila , A. J. T., et al. 2020, , 497, 4795, 10.1093/mnras/staa1967

    2020 doi

  65. [76]

    C., Skillman , E

    Jackson , D. C., Skillman , E. D., Cannon , J. M., & C \^o t \'e , S. 2004, , 128, 1219, 10.1086/423292

    2004 doi

  66. [77]

    H., Chester , T., Cutri , R., Schneider , S

    Jarrett , T. H., Chester , T., Cutri , R., Schneider , S. E., & Huchra , J. P. 2003, , 125, 525, 10.1086/345794

    2003 doi

  67. [78]

    2013, , 145, 146, 10.1088/0004-6256/145/6/146

    Johnson , M. 2013, , 145, 146, 10.1088/0004-6256/145/6/146

    2013 doi

  68. [79]

    C., Boyer , M

    Jones , O. C., Boyer , M. L., McDonald , I., Meixner , M., & van Loon , J. T. 2023, , 525, 3693, 10.1093/mnras/stad2472

    2023 doi

  69. [80]

    C., Sharma , K., Gangopadhyay , A., Gokhale , R., & Misra , K

    Joshi , Y. C., Sharma , K., Gangopadhyay , A., Gokhale , R., & Misra , K. 2019, , 158, 175, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab39e9

    2019 doi

  70. [81]

    Z., Carignan , C., Chemin , L., et al

    Kam , S. Z., Carignan , C., Chemin , L., et al. 2017, , 154, 41, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa79f3

    2017 doi

  71. [82]

    D., Karachentseva , V

    Karachentsev , I. D., Karachentseva , V. E., Huchtmeier , W. K., & Makarov , D. I. 2004, , 127, 2031, 10.1086/382905

    2004 doi

  72. [83]

    D., Makarov , D

    Karachentsev , I. D., Makarov , D. I., & Kaisina , E. I. 2013, , 145, 101, 10.1088/0004-6256/145/4/101

    2013 doi

  73. [84]

    C., Davies , J

    Keenan , O. C., Davies , J. I., Taylor , R., & Minchin , R. F. 2016, , 456, 951, 10.1093/mnras/stv2684

    2016 doi

  74. [85]

    A., Wilcots , E

    Kepley , A. A., Wilcots , E. M., Hunter , D. A., & Nordgren , T. 2007, , 133, 2242, 10.1086/513716

    2007 doi

  75. [86]

    J., Hindman , J

    Kerr , F. J., Hindman , J. F., & Robinson , B. J. 1954, Australian Journal of Physics, 7, 297, 10.1071/PH540297

    1954 doi

  76. [87]

    2022, uvcombine: Combine images with different resolutions , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2208.014

    Koch , E., & Ginsburg , A. 2022, uvcombine: Combine images with different resolutions , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2208.014

    2022

  77. [88]

    C., Kepley , A

    Koch , E., Rosolowsky , E., Johnson , M. C., Kepley , A. A., & Leroy , A. 2018 a , Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 2, 24, 10.3847/2515-5172/aaac33

    2018 doi

  78. [89]

    W., Chiang , I.-D., Utomo , D., et al

    Koch , E. W., Chiang , I.-D., Utomo , D., et al. 2020, , 492, 2663, 10.1093/mnras/stz3582

    2020 doi

  79. [91]

    2018 c , , 479, 2505, 10.1093/mnras/sty1674

    ---. 2018 c , , 479, 2505, 10.1093/mnras/sty1674

    2018 doi

  80. [93]

    2021 b , , 504, 1801, 10.1093/mnras/stab981

    ---. 2021 b , , 504, 1801, 10.1093/mnras/stab981

    2021 doi

  81. [94]

    S., Wang , J., Kamphuis , P., et al

    Koribalski , B. S., Wang , J., Kamphuis , P., et al. 2018, , 478, 1611, 10.1093/mnras/sty479

    2018 doi

  82. [95]

    Krumholz , M. R. 2014, , 539, 49, 10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.001

    2014 doi

  83. [96]

    R., Leroy , A

    Krumholz , M. R., Leroy , A. K., & McKee , C. F. 2011, , 731, 25, 10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/25

    2011 doi

  84. [97]

    Lake , G., & Skillman , E. D. 1989, , 98, 1274, 10.1086/115215

    1989 doi

  85. [98]

    J., Bower , G

    Law , C. J., Bower , G. C., Burke-Spolaor , S., et al. 2018, , 236, 8, 10.3847/1538-4365/aab77b

    2018 doi

  86. [99]

    J., Freedman , W

    Lee , A. J., Freedman , W. L., Madore , B. F., et al. 2021, , 907, 112, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd253

    2021 doi

  87. [100]

    J., Monson , A

    Lee , A. J., Monson , A. J., Freedman , W. L., et al. 2024, , 967, 22, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad32c7

    2024 doi

  88. [101]

    D., & Venn , K

    Lee , H., Skillman , E. D., & Venn , K. A. 2005, , 620, 223, 10.1086/427019

    2005 doi

  89. [102]

    2006, , 642, 813, 10.1086/500568

    ---. 2006, , 642, 813, 10.1086/500568

    2006 doi

  90. [103]

    H., & Lee , M

    Lee , J. H., & Lee , M. G. 2014, , 786, 130, 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/130

    2014 doi

  91. [104]

    2006, , 643, 825, 10.1086/503024

    Leroy , A., Bolatto , A., Walter , F., & Blitz , L. 2006, , 643, 825, 10.1086/503024

    2006 doi

  92. [105]

    K., Walter , F., Brinks , E., et al

    Leroy , A. K., Walter , F., Brinks , E., et al. 2008, , 136, 2782, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2782

    2008 doi

  93. [107]

    2019 b , , 244, 24, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab3925

    ---. 2019 b , , 244, 24, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab3925

    2019 doi

  94. [109]

    2021 b , , 255, 19, 10.3847/1538-4365/abec80

    ---. 2021 b , , 255, 19, 10.3847/1538-4365/abec80

    2021 doi

  95. [110]

    C., & Newman , J

    Licquia , T. C., & Newman , J. A. 2015, , 806, 96, 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/96

    2015 doi

  96. [111]

    1999, , 511, 235, 10.1086/306667

    Lockett, P., Gauthier, E., & Elitzur, M. 1999, , 511, 235, 10.1086/306667

    1999 doi

  97. [112]

    J., Free , N

    Lockman , F. J., Free , N. L., & Shields , J. C. 2012, , 144, 52, 10.1088/0004-6256/144/2/52

    2012 doi

  98. [113]

    A., & Podorvanyuk , N

    Lozinskaya , T. A., & Podorvanyuk , N. Y. 2009, Astronomy Letters, 35, 375, 10.1134/S1063773709060024

    2009 doi

  99. [114]

    Lucchini , S., D'Onghia , E., & Fox , A. J. 2021, , 921, L36, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac3338

    2021 doi

  100. [115]

    Mac Low , M.-M., & Klessen , R. S. 2004, Reviews of Modern Physics, 76, 125, 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.125

    2004 doi

  101. [116]

    M., & de Blok , W

    Maccagni , F. M., & de Blok , W. J. G. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.03166, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.03166

    2024 doi arXiv

  102. [117]

    2014, , 570, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201423496

    Makarov , D., Prugniel , P., Terekhova , N., Courtois , H., & Vauglin , I. 2014, , 570, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201423496

    2014 doi

  103. [118]

    W., Braatz , J

    Marganian , P., Garwood , R. W., Braatz , J. A., Radziwill , N. M., & Maddalena , R. J. 2013, GBTIDL: Reduction and Analysis of GBT Spectral Line Data , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1303.019

    2013

  104. [119]

    Mateo , M. L. 1998, , 36, 435, 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.435

    1998 doi

  105. [120]

    M., Stanimirovi \'c , S., & Rybarczyk , D

    McClure-Griffiths , N. M., Stanimirovi \'c , S., & Rybarczyk , D. R. 2023, , 61, 19, 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-104851

    2023 doi

  106. [121]

    McConnachie , A. W. 2012, , 144, 4, 10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/4

    2012 doi

  107. [122]

    K., Babler , B

    Mittal , A. K., Babler , B. L., Stanimirovi \'c , S., & Pingel , N. 2023, , 958, 192, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0464

    2023 doi

  108. [123]

    A., Menanteau , F., et al

    Morganson , E., Gruendl , R. A., Menanteau , F., et al. 2018, , 130, 074501, 10.1088/1538-3873/aab4ef

    2018 doi

  109. [124]

    2023, , 953, 164, 10.3847/1538-4357/ace4bd

    Muraoka , K., Konishi , A., Tokuda , K., et al. 2023, , 953, 164, 10.3847/1538-4357/ace4bd

    2023 doi

  110. [125]

    J., Bolatto , A., Chatterjee , S., et al

    Murphy , E. J., Bolatto , A., Chatterjee , S., et al. 2018, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 517, Science with a Next Generation Very Large Array, ed. E. Murphy , 3. 1810.07524

    2018 arXiv

  111. [126]

    E., Stanimirovi \'c , S., Goss , W

    Murray , C. E., Stanimirovi \'c , S., Goss , W. M., et al. 2018, , 238, 14, 10.3847/1538-4365/aad81a

    2018 doi

  112. [127]

    E., Lindner , R

    Murray , C. E., Lindner , R. R., Stanimirovi \'c , S., et al. 2014, , 781, L41, 10.1088/2041-8205/781/2/L41

    2014 doi

  113. [128]

    E., Stanimirovi \'c , S., Goss , W

    Murray , C. E., Stanimirovi \'c , S., Goss , W. M., et al. 2015, , 804, 89, 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/89

    2015 doi

  114. [129]

    2019, , 490, 3365, 10.1093/mnras/stz2737

    Namumba , B., Carignan , C., Foster , T., & Deg , N. 2019, , 490, 3365, 10.1093/mnras/stz2737

    2019 doi

  115. [131]

    2017 b , , 472, 3761, 10.1093/mnras/stx2256

    ---. 2017 b , , 472, 3761, 10.1093/mnras/stx2256

    2017 doi

  116. [132]

    L., Ashley , T., Slater , C

    Nidever , D. L., Ashley , T., Slater , C. T., et al. 2013, , 779, L15, 10.1088/2041-8205/779/2/L15

    2013 doi

  117. [133]

    2006, , 453, 459, 10.1051/0004-6361:20035672

    Nieten , C., Neininger , N., Gu \'e lin , M., et al. 2006, , 453, 459, 10.1051/0004-6361:20035672

    2006 doi

  118. [134]

    A., Brinks , E., et al

    Oh , S.-H., Hunter , D. A., Brinks , E., et al. 2015, , 149, 180, 10.1088/0004-6256/149/6/180

    2015 doi

  119. [135]

    1993, , 45, L21

    Ohta , K., Tomita , A., Saito , M., Sasaki , M., & Nakai , N. 1993, , 45, L21

    1993

  120. [137]

    2012 b , , 144, 123, 10.1088/0004-6256/144/4/123

    ---. 2012 b , , 144, 123, 10.1088/0004-6256/144/4/123

    2012 doi

  121. [138]

    V., Barr , E

    Padmanabh , P. V., Barr , E. D., Sridhar , S. S., et al. 2023, , 524, 1291, 10.1093/mnras/stad1900

    2023 doi

  122. [139]

    2022, , 164, 82, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7c1b

    Park , H.-J., Oh , S.-H., Wang , J., et al. 2022, , 164, 82, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7c1b

    2022 doi

  123. [140]

    2003, , 412, 45, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031411

    Paturel , G., Petit , C., Prugniel , P., et al. 2003, , 412, 45, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031411

    2003 doi

  124. [141]

    Peek , J. E. G., Heiles , C., Douglas , K. A., et al. 2011, , 194, 20, 10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/20

    2011 doi

  125. [142]

    G., et al

    Peltonen , J., Rosolowsky , E., Williams , T. G., et al. 2024, , 527, 10668, 10.1093/mnras/stad3879

    2024 doi

  126. [143]

    A., & Butler , B

    Perley , R. A., & Butler , B. J. 2017, , 230, 7, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6df9

    2017 doi

  127. [144]

    A., Chandler , C

    Perley , R. A., Chandler , C. J., Butler , B. J., & Wrobel , J. M. 2011, , 739, L1, 10.1088/2041-8205/739/1/L1

    2011 doi

  128. [145]

    M., Pisano , D

    Pingel , N. M., Pisano , D. J., Heald , G., et al. 2018, , 865, 36, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad816

    2018 doi

  129. [146]

    M., Dempsey , J., McClure-Griffiths , N

    Pingel , N. M., Dempsey , J., McClure-Griffiths , N. M., et al. 2022, , 39, e005, 10.1017/pasa.2021.59

    2022 doi

  130. [147]

    M., Chen , H., Stanimirovi \'c , S., et al

    Pingel , N. M., Chen , H., Stanimirovi \'c , S., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.13829, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.13829

    2024 doi arXiv

  131. [148]

    E., Peek , J

    Putman , M. E., Peek , J. E. G., & Joung , M. R. 2012, , 50, 491, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125612

    2012 doi

  132. [149]

    E., Staveley-Smith , L., Freeman , K

    Putman , M. E., Staveley-Smith , L., Freeman , K. C., Gibson , B. K., & Barnes , D. G. 2003, , 586, 170, 10.1086/344477

    2003 doi

  133. [150]

    E., Zheng , Y., Price-Whelan , A

    Putman , M. E., Zheng , Y., Price-Whelan , A. M., et al. 2021, , 913, 53, 10.3847/1538-4357/abe391

    2021 doi

  134. [151]

    E., Peek , J

    Putman , M. E., Peek , J. E. G., Muratov , A., et al. 2009, , 703, 1486, 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/1486

    2009 doi

  135. [152]

    C., Galliano , F., et al

    R \'e my-Ruyer , A., Madden , S. C., Galliano , F., et al. 2014, , 563, A31, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322803

    2014 doi

  136. [153]

    Rogers , N. S. J., Skillman , E. D., Pogge , R. W., et al. 2022, , 939, 44, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac947d

    2022 doi

  137. [154]

    G., Hunter , D

    Rubio , M., Elmegreen , B. G., Hunter , D. A., et al. 2015, , 525, 218, 10.1038/nature14901

    2015 doi

  138. [155]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2202.00690

    Saintonge , A., & Catinella , B. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2202.00690. 2202.00690

    2022 arXiv

  139. [156]

    2008, , 15, 189, 10.1007/s00159-008-0010-0

    Sancisi , R., Fraternali , F., Oosterloo , T., & van der Hulst , T. 2008, , 15, 189, 10.1007/s00159-008-0010-0

    2008 doi

  140. [157]

    B., et al

    Sanna , N., Bono , G., Stetson , P. B., et al. 2008, , 688, L69, 10.1086/595551

    2008 doi

  141. [158]

    J., Pingel , N

    Sardone , A., Pisano , D. J., Pingel , N. M., et al. 2021, , 910, 69, 10.3847/1538-4357/abde45

    2021 doi

  142. [159]

    2012, , 544, A144, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219025

    Sasaki , M., Pietsch , W., Haberl , F., et al. 2012, , 544, A144, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219025

    2012 doi

  143. [160]

    R., Skillman , E

    Savino , A., Weisz , D. R., Skillman , E. D., et al. 2022, , 938, 101, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac91cb

    2022 doi

  144. [162]

    2022 b , , 933, 155, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6875

    ---. 2022 b , , 933, 155, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6875

    2022 doi

  145. [163]

    Schinnerer , E., & Leroy , A. K. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.19843, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.19843

    2024 doi arXiv

  146. [164]

    K., Walter , F., et al

    Schruba , A., Leroy , A. K., Walter , F., et al. 2011, , 142, 37, 10.1088/0004-6256/142/2/37

    2011 doi

  147. [165]

    K., Kruijssen , J

    Schruba , A., Leroy , A. K., Kruijssen , J. M. D., et al. 2017, , 835, 278, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/278

    2017 doi

  148. [166]

    S., & Skillman , E

    Shostak , G. S., & Skillman , E. D. 1989, , 214, 33

    1989

  149. [167]

    2006, , 448, 123, 10.1051/0004-6361:20053326

    Silich , S., Lozinskaya , T., Moiseev , A., et al. 2006, , 448, 123, 10.1051/0004-6361:20053326

    2006 doi

  150. [169]

    1999 b , , 302, 417, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02013.x

    ---. 1999 b , , 302, 417, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02013.x

    1999

  151. [170]

    F., Mazzarella , J

    Steer , I., Madore , B. F., Mazzarella , J. M., et al. 2017, , 153, 37, 10.3847/1538-3881/153/1/37

    2017 doi

  152. [171]

    2014, , 790, 10, 10.1088/0004-637X/790/1/10

    Sternberg , A., Le Petit , F., Roueff , E., & Le Bourlot , J. 2014, , 790, 10, 10.1088/0004-637X/790/1/10

    2014 doi

  153. [172]

    K., Schruba , A., et al

    Sun , J., Leroy , A. K., Schruba , A., et al. 2018, , 860, 172, 10.3847/1538-4357/aac326

    2018 doi

  154. [173]

    Sun , J., et al. 2022,

    2022

  155. [174]

    S., Beck , R., Kr \"u gel , E., et al

    Tabatabaei , F. S., Beck , R., Kr \"u gel , E., et al. 2007, , 475, 133, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078174

    2007 doi

  156. [175]

    S., Cotton , W., Schinnerer , E., et al

    Tabatabaei , F. S., Cotton , W., Schinnerer , E., et al. 2022, , 517, 2990, 10.1093/mnras/stac2514

    2022 doi

  157. [176]

    J., Genzel , R., & Sternberg , A

    Tacconi , L. J., Genzel , R., & Sternberg , A. 2020, , 58, 157, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141034

    2020 doi

  158. [177]

    G., Dalcanton , J

    Telford , O. G., Dalcanton , J. J., Williams , B. F., et al. 2020, , 891, 32, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab701c

    2020 doi

  159. [178]

    A., Braun , R., & Walterbos , R

    Thilker , D. A., Braun , R., & Walterbos , R. A. M. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 276, Seeing Through the Dust: The Detection of HI and the Exploration of the ISM in Galaxies, ed. A. R. Taylor , T. L. Landecker , & A. G. Willis , 370

    2002

  160. [179]

    A., Braun , R., Walterbos , R

    Thilker , D. A., Braun , R., Walterbos , R. A. M., et al. 2004, , 601, L39, 10.1086/381703

    2004 doi

  161. [180]

    A., & Heckman , T

    Thompson , T. A., & Heckman , T. M. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.08561, 10.48550/arXiv.2406.08561

    2024 doi arXiv

  162. [181]

    2019, , 871, 17, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf582

    Utomo , D., Blitz , L., & Falgarone , E. 2019, , 871, 17, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf582

    2019 doi

  163. [182]

    van de Hulst , H. C. 1945, Nederlandsch Tijdschrift voor Natuurkunde, 11, 210

    1945

  164. [183]

    1999, , 9, 273, 10.1007/s001590050019

    van den Bergh , S. 1999, , 9, 273, 10.1007/s001590050019

    1999 doi

  165. [184]

    E., et al

    Virtanen , P., Gommers , R., Oliphant , T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  166. [186]

    2008 b , , 136, 2563, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2563

    ---. 2008 b , , 136, 2563, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2563

    2008 doi

  167. [187]

    2020, , 902, 111, 10.3847/1538-4357/abb82e

    Walter , F., Carilli , C., Neeleman , M., et al. 2020, , 902, 111, 10.3847/1538-4357/abb82e

    2020 doi

  168. [188]

    S., Serra , P., et al

    Wang , J., Koribalski , B. S., Serra , P., et al. 2016, , 460, 2143, 10.1093/mnras/stw1099

    2016 doi

  169. [189]

    2017, mwaskom/seaborn: v0.8.1 (September 2017), 10.5281/zenodo.883859

    Waskom, M., Botvinnik, O., O'Kane, D., et al. 2017, mwaskom/seaborn: v0.8.1 (September 2017), 10.5281/zenodo.883859

    2017 doi

  170. [190]

    R., Dolphin , A

    Weisz , D. R., Dolphin , A. E., Savino , A., et al. 2024, , 271, 47, 10.3847/1538-4365/ad2600

    2024 doi

  171. [191]

    Weldrake , D. T. F., de Blok , W. J. G., & Walter , F. 2003, , 340, 12, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06170.x

    2003

  172. [192]

    J., et al

    Westcott , J., Brinks , E., Beswick , R. J., et al. 2017, , 467, 2113, 10.1093/mnras/stx188

    2017 doi

  173. [193]

    2005, , 436, 101, 10.1051/0004-6361:20052867

    Westmeier , T., Braun , R., & Thilker , D. 2005, , 436, 101, 10.1051/0004-6361:20052867

    2005 doi

  174. [194]

    L., Long , K

    White , R. L., Long , K. S., Becker , R. H., et al. 2019, , 241, 37, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab0e89

    2019 doi

  175. [195]

    M., & Miller , B

    Wilcots , E. M., & Miller , B. W. 1998, , 116, 2363, 10.1086/300595

    1998 doi

  176. [196]

    F., Durbin , M

    Williams , B. F., Durbin , M. J., Dalcanton , J. J., et al. 2021, , 253, 53, 10.3847/1538-4365/abdf4e

    2021 doi

  177. [197]

    G., Vallini , L., & Chevance , M

    Wolfire , M. G., Vallini , L., & Chevance , M. 2022, , 60, 247, 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-010254

    2022 doi

  178. [198]

    Yang , H., & Skillman , E. D. 1993, , 106, 1448, 10.1086/116738

    1993 doi

  179. [199]

    2022, , 660, L11, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243307

    Yang , Y., Ianjamasimanana , R., Hammer , F., et al. 2022, , 660, L11, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243307

    2022 doi

  180. [200]

    L., Prantzos , N., et al

    Yin , J., Hou , J. L., Prantzos , N., et al. 2009, , 505, 497, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912316

    2009 doi

  181. [201]

    2012, , 427, 1463, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22075.x

    Zurita , A., & Bresolin , F. 2012, , 427, 1463, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22075.x

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.