Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Synesthesia of Machines (SoM)-Enhanced Sub-THz ISAC Transmission for Air-Ground Network

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read By coupling RGB-D cameras with a small number of squint-aware radio probes, this paper claims, a sub-THz base station can align its communication and sensing channels in beamspace and achieve higher frame-level ISAC efficiency than…

desk verdict The integrated framework is genuinely useful, but Proposition 1's unproven monotonicity chain is a real soft spot that should be fixed or reframed as a heuristic. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.12831 v1 pith:3YCAXK4E submitted 2025-06-15 eess.SP cs.AI

Zonghui Yang , Shijian Gao , Xiang Cheng , Liuqing Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SPcs.AI
keywords integratedsensingandcommunicationsub-terahertzair-groundnetworkhybridprecodingbeamsquinttruetimedelayvision-RFfusionISACefficiency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that sub-THz integrated sensing and communication in air-ground networks can be made both faster to set up and more effective by fusing camera images with a small number of radio measurements. Its central proposition is that raising the correlation between the communication and sensing channels, measured in beamspace, monotonically improves both the achievable spectral efficiency and the angle-estimation Cramér-Rao bound; if true, this makes "make the two channels look alike" a design objective. The paper then shows a concrete way to pursue that objective: use the true-time-delay layers of a hybrid precoder to rotate the equivalent channels, guide the process with a neural network that maps RGB-D images and a positioning spectrum to precoder parameters, and replace exhaustive beam training with a squint-aware cross-pattern beam tracking that exploits the frequency-dependent squint of sub-THz beams. The payoff the authors report is that their SoM-ISAC scheme nearly halves the per-frame running time of a radio-only near-optimal benchmark while keeping a competitive SE-CRB trade-off, and it outperforms radio-only schemes under the new ISAC efficiency metric that accounts for time overhead. A sympathetic reader would care because the claim, if correct, turns sub-THz hardware limitations into an actionable degree of freedom and points toward zero-pilot, vision-aided ISAC operation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the C-S channel correlation $\mathrm{Cor}(H,G)$, defined in Eq. (13) as the reciprocal of the Kullback-Leibler divergence between normalized beamspace power distributions of the communication and sensing channels aggregated over subcarriers. Proposition 1 asserts that this scalar controls the Pareto-optimal SE-CRB pair; the proof links it to the overlap $S(H,G)$ of beamspace peaks. The hardware that converts correlation into a tunable quantity is the true-time-delay (TTD) layer of the hybrid precoder: TTDs introduce frequency-dependent phase shifts, so at sub-THz bandwidths the otherwise harmful beam squint can be directed along angular trajectories or used to align equivalent channels. The squint-aware cross-pattern beam tracking (SA-CP-BT) mechanism exploits this by partitioning a visually obtained angular range and sweeping squint beams in horizontal and vertical passes, so a user or target angle is read off from the subcarrier with maximal array gain. Finally, the ViR-Net architecture (spectrum encoder, vision encoder, feature-fusion transformer, and precoding head) maps the positioning spectrum and RGB-D images to TTD, phase-shifter, and digital precoder values, trained by the loss in Eq. (24) that rewards both high correlation and good SE and CRB, and the ISAC efficiency metric in Eqs. (25)-(26) weights these performance gains by the time spent to obtain them.

What would settle it

Run a Monte Carlo sweep over user-target angular separations in the paper's channel model, computing $\mathrm{Cor}(H,G)$, the beamspace peak overlap $S(H,G)$, and the Pareto-optimal SE-CRB pair from Eqs. (27)-(31); if any channel pair has higher $\mathrm{Cor}(H,G)$ but lower $S(H,G)$, or higher $S(H,G)$ but a worse SE-CRB trade-off, then Proposition 1 is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Proposition 1: as the communication-sensing channel correlation $\mathrm{Cor}(H,G)$ grows, the achievable spectral efficiency improves and the Cramér-Rao bound on target angle estimation decreases in a monotonic way. Here $\mathrm{Cor}(H,G)$ is the inverse KL divergence between the normalized beamspace power distributions of the aggregated communication and sensing channels, so it is a measure of how much the strongest communication and sensing directions overlap. Relying on this monotonicity, the authors treat the TTD-delay network of a standard hybrid precoder as a channel modulator: by choosing delays that raise the correlation, the equivalent communication and sensing channels are rotated toward each other without adding hardware. The rest of the framework — visual detection of users and low-altitude targets from RGB-D images, squint-aware cross-pattern beam tracking for angle refinement, and the ViR-Net that outputs TTD, phase-shifter, and digital precoder values under a correlation-weighted loss — is a way to realize this correlation gain quickly. The reported simulations conclude that the proposed scheme achieves significantly higher ISAC efficiency than RF-only schemes at the frame level, while remaining close to a radio-only near-optimal benchmark in the absolute SE-CRB trade-off.

Load-bearing premise

The whole design rests on the unproven step that when the communication and sensing beamspace distributions look more similar, their strongest beams actually overlap more, and that this overlap alone improves both data rate and sensing accuracy; the paper asserts this link rather than deriving it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any design knob that raises $\mathrm{Cor}(H,G)$ — not just TTD delays — should improve the SE-CRB trade-off, making beamspace channel correlation a primary target for ISAC precoder design.
  • Skipping the synchronization-signal block, initial beam training, and instantaneous channel estimation lets the saved time be spent in data transmission and sensing, which is why the proposed frame structure yields higher time-averaged SE and lower time-averaged CRB at the frame level.
  • The ablation results indicate that vision alone is not enough in sub-THz: the vision-only variant performs poorly, so sparse RF refinement through SA-CP-BT is a necessary complement to visual priors.
  • The number of beam-tracking slots, the number of pilots, and the number of TTDs each exhibit an optimum under the efficiency metric, so the framework provides a concrete criterion for trading estimation accuracy against operational latency.
  • In quasi-static settings with long subframe periods the radio-only near-optimal scheme becomes competitive or better, so the proposed scheme's advantage is specific to dynamic air-ground scenarios where positions change quickly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Proposition 1's monotonicity holds in general, then other means of increasing beamspace overlap, such as subcarrier assignment or reconfigurable-surface phase profiles, could substitute for TTD-based rotation; the paper does not test this, but it follows from treating correlation rather than hardware as the fundamental resource.
  • The SA-CP-BT principle effectively uses OFDM subcarriers as spatial indices within a single beam, which suggests a testable extension: a two-dimensional squint pattern that resolves both azimuth and elevation from one slot, at the price of handling ambiguity near grid boundaries.
  • The reported efficiency numbers come from ray-traced simulations of one intersection; field experiments would need to show that camera depth errors and object-detection misses, which are absent in simulation, do not erase the time savings.
  • The ISAC efficiency metric treats SE and CRB as a pair but does not say how a network should weight communication versus sensing value; choosing such weights could change the optimal number of slots and pilots.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a vision-RF fused ISAC transmission framework for sub-THz air-ground networks. It uses RGB-D cameras for coarse user/target localization, a squint-aware cross-pattern beam tracking (SA-CP-BT) scheme with true-time-delay (TTD) arrays for fine angle refinement, and a transformer-based ViR-Net that maps positioning spectra and images to TTD/PS/digital precoder parameters. The training loss (Eq. (24)) rewards high communication-sensing channel correlation Cor(H,G)=1/KL(beamspace power distributions), and the evaluation metric "ISAC efficiency" combines time-averaged SE and CRB with frame-structure overhead. Simulations in Figs. 7-13 compare SoM-ISAC against RF-only, vision-only, BCD, squint-elimination, and squint-sensing baselines, reporting better ISAC efficiency boundaries, lower runtime, and robustness to spatial distributions, TTD count, pilot count, and subframe duration.

Significance. If the main proposition holds, the framework is a credible way to exploit sub-THz hardware DoF and out-of-band visual data, with a useful efficiency metric and extensive simulation support. Strengths: the paper provides a detailed system model, an explicit frame-structure overhead model, ablation studies (Table V), and a wide set of comparisons; the central simulation results are internally consistent. However, the theoretical justification for the correlation-based loss and TTD regulation rests on Proposition 1, whose proof in Appendix A has a missing monotonicity argument. Since the loss function in Eq. (24) directly optimizes Cor(H,G), the reported gains could be an artifact of optimizing a proxy that is not established to track the SE-CRB boundary. The contribution is therefore conditional on closing that proof gap or replacing it with numerical validation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section II-D and Appendix A (Proposition 1, Eqs. (13), (31))] The proof of Proposition 1 does not establish the claimed monotonic chain. Eq. (31) defines the xi terms in terms of exact peak-coincidence indicators I(psi_{c,m}=psi_{s,k,m}); it shows that both xi terms depend on S(H,G), but not that R* and CRB* are monotone in Cor(H,G). The statement "It can be proved that a higher Cor(H,G) gives rise to a higher S(H,G)" is cited to [43], which addresses KL divergence approximation for Gaussian mixture models and does not imply a monotone relation between inverse KL and the number of coincident beamspace peaks. Moreover, Cor(H,G) can increase by concentrating probability mass within a fixed beam index while S(H,G) remains unchanged, and S(H,G) can jump discontinuously under an arbitrarily small change in Cor(H,G). Because the loss in Eq. (24) directly rewards Cor(H,G)/Cor^*(H,G), the training objective may optimize a quantity that does not provably track the actual SE-CRB boundary. Please either supply a rigorous derivation of both implications or state Proposition 1 as a conjecture and support it with numerical evidence.
  2. [Section IV-C, Eq. (24)] The loss function normalizes by Cor^*(H,G), described as the maximum achievable correlation for each sample, but Cor^* is never defined or computed. Without a precise definition, the normalization is ambiguous: Cor^* could depend on the TTD configuration, making the loss's optimization landscape unclear, or it could be a theoretical maximum that is not available at training time. Please define Cor^*, explain how it is obtained, and state whether it is updated during training or fixed beforehand.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II-D, Eq. (13)] The KL divergence in the definition of Cor(H,G) is asymmetric and can be infinite when the sensing beamspace distribution has zero mass on a bin where the communication distribution is positive. Please clarify how zero entries are handled in the numerical implementation and whether this affects the smoothness of the training loss.
  2. [Section III-C, Appendix B] In the proof of Proposition 2, the monotonicity of phi_m and theta_m with the subcarrier index is asserted with "It is easy to prove" and the extension from Q_t=N_t to general Q_t is stated without derivation. Please provide the explicit monotonicity argument and justify the averaging step for subarrays of size L_h x L_v.
  3. [Section V-A, Fig. 7(a)] The curve labeled "Perfect Prior" is not described in the comparison-methods list in Section V-C. Please state how this bound is computed and whether it uses the same precoder optimization as SA-Opt-ISAC but with perfect channel knowledge.
  4. [Section V-E, Figs. 10-13] The horizontal-axis label in Fig. 12 is inconsistent with the caption and the clause in the text: the axis reads "number of TTDs Qt" with ticks 0 to 300, while Table I sets Q_t=256 and the text compares Q_t=N_t with N_t=256. Please align the axis, the caption, and the parameter range.
  5. [Notation, Section II-A] In the sentence defining the TTD operation in Eq. (2), the expression uses vec(T ⊗ 1_{L_h x L_v}), but T is a Q_th x Q_tv matrix and the Kronecker product with the all-one matrix gives dimensions that are not explicitly mapped to the N_t x N_RF phase-shifter array. Please clarify the exact indexing used to place the TTD delays in the diagonal matrix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported SE/CRB gains are measured from actual simulation, and the correlation-based loss is an additional objective rather than a fitted prediction; Proposition 1 contains an unproven monotonicity bridge but no definitional reduction.

full rationale

The central claim that higher C-S correlation improves SE and CRB is Proposition 1, proved in Appendix A. The proof derives Pareto-boundary expressions (29)-(30) from [42] and then asserts: 'It can be proved that a higher Cor(H,G) gives rise to a higher S(H,G)[43].' This bridge is not established by [43], which is a GMM-KL approximation paper, and it is not a consequence of the definitions of Cor (inverse KL) and S (exact beam-index peak coincidences); lower KL can leave the argmax peaks unchanged or change them discontinuously. This is a substantive correctness gap, but it is not circularity: Cor is defined independently of R and CRB, and the simulated SE/CRB in Figs. 7-13 are computed from the actual precoded channels, not from the correlation metric. The loss function (24) also directly contains CRB and SE terms, so the training objective is not merely maximizing its own evaluation metric. Self-citations [5], [23], [27], and [31] supply the SoM concept, baselines, and beamspace sparsity; none is the sole load-bearing proof of the main result, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Score 2 reflects minor non-load-bearing self-citation and the unsupported Proposition 1 bridge, not circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on standard ISAC channel and CRB models, plus an unproven monotonicity assertion that links the invented correlation metric to performance. The loss function in Eq. (24) is a heuristic guided by this assertion.

free parameters (2)
  • SE threshold Gamma (loss parameter)
    Appears in the ReLU penalty of the loss function in Eq. (24); chosen by the authors, value not reported in the tables, and no sensitivity analysis is given.
  • Weighting coefficient eta_c (loss parameter)
    Controls the weight of the SE penalty relative to the CRB in Eq. (24); value not reported, no sensitivity analysis.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Communication channel model in Eq. (3) with path gains, distances, and far-field steering vectors from [28].
    Underlies all SE computations; assumes known ray-tracing and free-space path loss.
  • domain assumption Target response model in Eq. (7) and CRB in Eqs. (9)-(10) from [29].
    Assumes point targets and whitened noise; the CRB is used as the sensing performance metric.
  • ad hoc to paper Higher Cor(H,G) implies higher peak overlap S(H,G), and higher S(H,G) implies better Pareto-optimal SE and CRB.
    Stated in Appendix A without proof; this is the critical unproven link used to justify the correlation-maximizing loss.
  • domain assumption Users and targets are within the camera FOV and their depth is measurable enough to initialize the angular ranges.
    The vision pipeline in Section III-B assumes that RGB-D data gives reliable bounding boxes and depth.
  • domain assumption The beam tracking works with a dominant LoS path; nLoS paths do not break the peak-search in Eqs. (22) and (23).
    The array-gain monotonicity in Proposition 2 is derived for a single steering vector; the channel model includes P_u multipath components.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Synesthesia of Machines (SoM)-Enhanced Sub-THz ISAC Transmission for Air-Ground Network." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3YCAXK4E

@misc{pith2026250612831,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Synesthesia of Machines (SoM)-Enhanced Sub-THz ISAC Transmission for Air-Ground Network},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3YCAXK4E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.12831}
}
read the original abstract

Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) within sub-THz frequencies is crucial for future air-ground networks, but unique propagation characteristics and hardware limitations present challenges in optimizing ISAC performance while increasing operational latency. This paper introduces a multi-modal sensing fusion framework inspired by synesthesia of machine (SoM) to enhance sub-THz ISAC transmission. By exploiting inherent degrees of freedom in sub-THz hardware and channels, the framework optimizes the radio-frequency environment. Squint-aware beam management is developed to improve air-ground network adaptability, enabling three-dimensional dynamic ISAC links. Leveraging multi-modal information, the framework enhances ISAC performance and reduces latency. Visual data rapidly localizes users and targets, while a customized multi-modal learning algorithm optimizes the hybrid precoder. A new metric provides comprehensive performance evaluation, and extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed scheme significantly improves ISAC efficiency.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.12831 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A diagram of ISAC systems in air-ground network. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A diagram of hybrid precoding structure in sub-THz systems. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Frame structure comparison between RF-only and vision-aided schemes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An illustration of the initial beam training and the proposed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An illustration of the architecture of the proposed ViR-Net. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Network training. E. Comparative Study We first validate the performance of the proposed ViR-Net model during the training process in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: ISAC performance comparison among different schemes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Running time comparison among different precoding schemes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparisons of ISAC efficiency among various schemes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Time-averaged CRB versus number of slots in SA-CP-BT. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Time-averaged CRB versus number of TTDs Qt. 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Sub-frame duration [s] 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time-averaged SE [bit/s/Hz] SoM-ISAC SA-Opt-ISAC Vi-ISAC BCD-ISAC [16] DPP [9] YOLO [11] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [43]

    Approximating the Kullback Leibler divergence between gaussian mixture models,

    J. R. Hershey and P. A. Olsen, “Approximating the Kullback Leibler divergence between gaussian mixture models,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., vol. 4, 2007, pp. 317–320

    work page 2007

  2. [23]

    Synesthesia of machines (SoM)- enhanced ISAC precoding for vehicular networks with double dynamics,

    Z. Yang, S. Gao, X. Cheng, and L. Yang, “Synesthesia of machines (SoM)- enhanced ISAC precoding for vehicular networks with double dynamics,”IEEE Trans. Commun., 2025, early access

    work page 2025

  3. [27]

    Synesthesia of Machine (SoM)-Driven Analog Precoder Optimization for Enhanced ISAC Performance in Sub-THz Systems

    Z. Yang, S. Gao, and X. Cheng, “Synesthesia of machine (SoM)-driven analog precoder optimization for enhanced ISAC performance in sub-THz systems,” 2024,arXiv:2412.13532

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  4. [1]

    A comprehensive overview on 5G-and-beyond networks with UA Vs: From communications to sensing and intelligence,

    Q. Wu, J. Xu, Y . Zeng, D. W. K. Ng, N. Al-Dhahir, R. Schober, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “A comprehensive overview on 5G-and-beyond networks with UA Vs: From communications to sensing and intelligence,”IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 2912–2945, Oct. 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [2]

    Integrated sensing and communi- cations (ISAC) for vehicular communication networks (VCN),

    X. Cheng, D. Duan, S. Gao, and L. Yang, “Integrated sensing and communi- cations (ISAC) for vehicular communication networks (VCN),”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 9, no. 23, pp. 23 441–23 451, Dec. 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [3]

    Integrated sensing and communication signals toward 5G-A and 6G: A survey,

    Z. Wei, H. Qu, Y . Wang, X. Yuan, H. Wu, Y . Du, K. Han, N. Zhang, and Z. Feng, “Integrated sensing and communication signals toward 5G-A and 6G: A survey,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 11 068–11 092, Jul. 2023. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2025 13

    work page 2023

  7. [4]

    THz ISAC: A physical-layer perspective of terahertz integrated sensing and communication,

    C. Han, Y . Wu, Z. Chen, Y . Chen, and G. Wang, “THz ISAC: A physical-layer perspective of terahertz integrated sensing and communication,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 102–108, Feb. 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [5]

    Intelligent multi-modal sensing-communication integration: Synesthesia of machines,

    X. Chenget al., “Intelligent multi-modal sensing-communication integration: Synesthesia of machines,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 258– 301, 1st Quart. 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 43 references
  1. [6]

    Vision-aided 6G wireless commu- nications: Blockage prediction and proactive handoff,

    G. Charan, M. Alrabeiah, and A. Alkhateeb, “Vision-aided 6G wireless commu- nications: Blockage prediction and proactive handoff,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 10 193–10 208, Oct. 2021

    2021

  2. [7]

    Hybrid arrays: How many RF chains are required to prevent beam squint?

    H. Do, N. Lee, R. W. Heath, and A. Lozano, “Hybrid arrays: How many RF chains are required to prevent beam squint?”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11 708–11 722, Sept. 2024

    2024

  3. [8]

    Spatial- and frequency-wideband effects in millimeter-wave massive MIMO systems,

    B. Wang, F. Gao, S. Jin, H. Lin, and G. Y . Li, “Spatial- and frequency-wideband effects in millimeter-wave massive MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Signal Pro- cess., vol. 66, no. 13, pp. 3393–3406, Jul. 2018

    2018

  4. [9]

    Delay-phase precoding for wideband THz massive MIMO,

    L. Dai, J. Tan, Z. Chen, and H. V . Poor, “Delay-phase precoding for wideband THz massive MIMO,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 7271– 7286, Sept. 2022

    2022

  5. [10]

    Joint delay-phase precoding under true-time delay constraints in wideband sub-THz hybrid massive MIMO systems,

    D. Q. Nguyen and T. Kim, “Joint delay-phase precoding under true-time delay constraints in wideband sub-THz hybrid massive MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 6633–6646, Oct. 2024

    2024

  6. [11]

    YOLO: An efficient terahertz band integrated sensing and communications scheme with beam squint,

    H. Luo, F. Gao, H. Lin, S. Ma, and H. V . Poor, “YOLO: An efficient terahertz band integrated sensing and communications scheme with beam squint,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 9389–9403, Aug. 2024

    2024

  7. [12]

    Unsupervised learning for joint beamforming design in RIS-aided ISAC systems,

    J. Ye, L. Huang, Z. Chen, P. Zhang, and M. Rihan, “Unsupervised learning for joint beamforming design in RIS-aided ISAC systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 2100–2104, Aug. 2024

    2024

  8. [13]

    Estimating doubly-selective channels for hybrid mmWave massive MIMO systems: A doubly-sparse approach,

    S. Gao, X. Cheng, and L. Yang, “Estimating doubly-selective channels for hybrid mmWave massive MIMO systems: A doubly-sparse approach,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 5703–5715, Sept. 2020

    2020

  9. [14]

    Estimation of wideband dynamic mmWave and THz channels for 5G systems and beyond,

    A. Brighente, M. Cerutti, M. Nicoli, S. Tomasin, and U. Spagnolini, “Estimation of wideband dynamic mmWave and THz channels for 5G systems and beyond,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 2026–2040, Sept. 2020

    2026

  10. [15]

    Beamforming optimization for robust sensing and communication in dynamic mmwave MIMO networks,

    L. Li, J. Zhang, and T.-H. Chang, “Beamforming optimization for robust sensing and communication in dynamic mmwave MIMO networks,”IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1354–1370, Apr. 2025

    2025

  11. [16]

    Low-complexity joint transceiver optimization for MmWave/THz MU-MIMO ISAC systems,

    P. Wang, J. Fang, X. Zeng, Z. Chen, and H. Li, “Low-complexity joint transceiver optimization for MmWave/THz MU-MIMO ISAC systems,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 5289–5304, Mar. 2025

    2025

  12. [17]

    Terahertz ultra-massive MIMO-based aeronautical communica- tions in space-air-ground integrated networks,

    A. Liaoet al., “Terahertz ultra-massive MIMO-based aeronautical communica- tions in space-air-ground integrated networks,”IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1741–1767, Jun. 2021

    2021

  13. [18]

    A unified 3D beam training and tracking procedure for terahertz communication,

    B. Ning, Z. Chen, Z. Tian, C. Han, and S. Li, “A unified 3D beam training and tracking procedure for terahertz communication,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 2445–2461, Apr. 2022

    2022

  14. [19]

    Wideband beam tracking in THz massive MIMO systems,

    J. Tan and L. Dai, “Wideband beam tracking in THz massive MIMO systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1693–1710, Jun. 2021

    2021

  15. [20]

    Spatial-chirp codebook-based hierarchical beam training for extremely large-scale massive MIMO,

    X. Shi, J. Wang, Z. Sun, and J. Song, “Spatial-chirp codebook-based hierarchical beam training for extremely large-scale massive MIMO,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2824–2838, Apr. 2024

    2024

  16. [21]

    3-D hybrid beamforming for terahertz broadband communication system with beam squint,

    Y . Wu, G. Song, H. Liu, L. Xiao, and T. Jiang, “3-D hybrid beamforming for terahertz broadband communication system with beam squint,”IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 264–275, Mar. 2023

    2023

  17. [22]

    Bayesian predictive beamforming for vehicular networks: A low- overhead joint radar-communication approach,

    W. Yuanet al., “Bayesian predictive beamforming for vehicular networks: A low- overhead joint radar-communication approach,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1442–1456, Mar. 2021

    2021

  18. [24]

    A LiDAR-aided channel model for vehicular intelligent sensing-communication integration,

    Z. Huang, L. Bai, M. Sun, and X. Cheng, “A LiDAR-aided channel model for vehicular intelligent sensing-communication integration,”IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 20 105–20 119, Dec. 2024

    2024

  19. [25]

    Integrated sensing and communi- cations toward proactive beamforming in mmWave V2I via multi-modal feature fusion (MMFF),

    H. Zhang, S. Gao, X. Cheng, and L. Yang, “Integrated sensing and communi- cations toward proactive beamforming in mmWave V2I via multi-modal feature fusion (MMFF),”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 15 721– 15 735, Jun. 2024

    2024

  20. [26]

    Deep learning based channel covariance matrix estimation with user location and scene images,

    W. Xu, F. Gao, J. Zhang, X. Tao, and A. Alkhateeb, “Deep learning based channel covariance matrix estimation with user location and scene images,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 8145–8158, Dec. 2021

    2021

  21. [28]

    Propagation modeling for wireless communications in the terahertz band,

    C. Han and Y . Chen, “Propagation modeling for wireless communications in the terahertz band,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 96–101, Jun. 2018

    2018

  22. [29]

    Integrated sensing and communication with mmwave massive MIMO: A com- pressed sampling perspective,

    Z. Gao, Z. Wan, D. Zheng, S. Tan, C. Masouros, D. W. K. Ng, and S. Chen, “Integrated sensing and communication with mmwave massive MIMO: A com- pressed sampling perspective,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1745–1762, Mar. 2023

    2023

  23. [30]

    Cram ´er-Rao bound optimization for joint radar-communication beamforming,

    F. Liu, Y .-F. Liu, A. Li, C. Masouros, and Y . C. Eldar, “Cram ´er-Rao bound optimization for joint radar-communication beamforming,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 70, pp. 240–253, Dec. 2022

    2022

  24. [31]

    Mutual information maximizing wideband multi-user (wMU) mmwave massive MIMO,

    S. Gao, X. Cheng, and L. Yang, “Mutual information maximizing wideband multi-user (wMU) mmwave massive MIMO,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 3067–3078, May 2021

    2021

  25. [32]

    RIS-assisted integrated sensing and communications: A subspace rotation approach,

    X. Meng, F. Liu, S. Lu, S. P. Chepuri, and C. Masouros, “RIS-assisted integrated sensing and communications: A subspace rotation approach,” inProc. IEEE Radar Conf. (RadarConf23), San Antonio, TX, USA, 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  26. [33]

    5G new radio: Waveform, frame structure, multiple access, and initial access,

    S.-Y . Lien, S.-L. Shieh, Y . Huang, B. Su, Y .-L. Hsu, and H.-Y . Wei, “5G new radio: Waveform, frame structure, multiple access, and initial access,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 64–71, Jun. 2017

    2017

  27. [34]

    An overview of 5G advanced evolution in 3GPP release 18,

    X. Lin, “An overview of 5G advanced evolution in 3GPP release 18,”IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 77–83, Sept. 2022

    2022

  28. [35]

    Automatic camera and range sensor calibration using a single shot,

    A. Geiger, F. Moosmann, O. Car, and B. Schuster, “Automatic camera and range sensor calibration using a single shot,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2012, pp. 3936–3943

    2012

  29. [36]

    Towards collaborative robotics in top view surveillance: A framework for multiple object tracking by detection using deep learning,

    I. Ahmed, S. Din, G. Jeon, F. Piccialli, and G. Fortino, “Towards collaborative robotics in top view surveillance: A framework for multiple object tracking by detection using deep learning,”IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1253–1270, Jul. 2021

    2021

  30. [37]

    Self- supervised RF signal representation learning for NextG signal classification with deep learning,

    K. Davaslioglu, S. Boztas ¸, M. C. Ertem, Y . E. Sagduyu, and E. Ayanoglu, “Self- supervised RF signal representation learning for NextG signal classification with deep learning,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 65–69, Jan. 2023

    2023

  31. [38]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,

    A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, and N. Houlsby, “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” 2020

    2020

  32. [39]

    Microscopic traffic simulation using SUMO,

    P. A. Lopezet al., “Microscopic traffic simulation using SUMO,” inThe 21st IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2018

    2018

  33. [40]

    AirSim: High-fidelity visual and physical simulation for autonomous vehicles,

    S. Shah, A. Kapoor, D. Dey, and C. Lovett, “AirSim: High-fidelity visual and physical simulation for autonomous vehicles,”Field and Service Robotics, pp. 621–635, Nov. 2017

    2017

  34. [41]

    Wireless InSite,

    Remcom., “Wireless InSite,” Accessed: Mar. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.remcom.com/wireless-insite-em-propagation-software

    2022

  35. [42]

    On the performance gain of integrated sensing and communications: A subspace correlation perspective,

    S. Lu, X. Meng, Z. Du, Y . Xiong, and F. Liu, “On the performance gain of integrated sensing and communications: A subspace correlation perspective,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., 2023, pp. 2735–2740

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.