Intelligent Rotatable Antenna for Integrated Sensing, Communication, and Computation: Challenges and Opportunities

Beixiong Zheng; Miaowen Wen; Shaoe Lin; Weihua Zhu; Wen Wu; Xue Xiong; Yong Zeng

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 15 references

Intelligent Rotatable Antenna for Integrated Sensing, Communication, and Computation: Challenges and Opportunities

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper makes the case that rotating a small number of directional antennas can give integrated sensing, communication, and computation systems the spatial adaptability that large fixed arrays lack, and backs it with a working…

desk verdict A credible overview of rotatable antennas for ISCC whose experiment overreaches: it shows beam tracking, not integrated ISCC. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.13586 v1 pith:7JSDCUAT submitted 2025-06-16 cs.IT math.IT

Xue Xiong , Beixiong Zheng , Wen Wu , Weihua Zhu , Miaowen Wen , Shaoe Lin , Yong Zeng This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.ITmath.IT

keywords intelligentrotatableantennaintegratedsensingcommunicationandcomputationdirectionalbeamsteeringboresightalignment6Gnetworksspatialdegreesoffreedomprototypeexperiment

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that future 6G networks that fuse sensing, communication, and computation ('ISCC') are poorly served by fixed antenna arrays, which need many elements to steer beams and still lose performance as users move or channels change. The proposed alternative is the intelligent rotatable antenna, a directional antenna whose boresight can be rotated in three dimensions, giving the system extra spatial degrees of freedom without a large array. The authors lay out how IRA benefits each ISCC function—sensing resolution, communication link quality, and computation offloading—and identify the main design problems: orientation-dependent channel modeling, interference management, boresight optimization, and trade-offs among the three tasks. A prototype at 5.8 GHz shows that a servo-rotated IRA keeps received SNR stable while a fixed antenna's SNR degrades as the receiver moves, supporting the claim that IRA-enabled ISCC is feasible and worth pursuing.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the intelligent rotatable antenna, a directional antenna whose boresight—the axis of maximum radiation—can be rotated in 3D mechanically (servo motors, MEMS), electronically (multi-feed or parasitic-element switching), or both. Rotation adds a boresight alignment gain to the usual beamforming gain, so a few elements can concentrate energy on a target, user, or edge server. Because rotation happens about a fixed position, the channel depends on orientation angles rather than position, which keeps spatial modeling closer to fixed-antenna systems than movable-antenna designs while still offering reconfigurability.

What would settle it

Run the same 5.8 GHz prototype again but derive the receiver's angle from the radio echo of the transmitted ISAC signal instead of from LiDAR, and move the receiver at realistic speed; the central claim collapses if the servo cannot keep the boresight aligned well enough to preserve the SNR advantage over a fixed antenna.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors claim that replacing a fixed antenna array with a small number of intelligent rotatable antennas—directional antennas whose boresight can be steered in three dimensions—adds spatial degrees of freedom that let one system sense targets, communicate with users, and offload computation without the hardware cost of a large array. Because each IRA can point at a different direction, the same array can spatially decouple the three tasks, and the rotation provides a boresight alignment gain on top of ordinary beamforming. Their prototype demonstrates the communication half of this claim: with the receiver moved across an azimuth range, the IRA tracks it and holds received SNR nearly constant, while a fixed antenna's SNR falls sharply.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the LiDAR-based angle estimate behaves like radio sensing and that the servo mechanism can rotate the antenna fast and accurately enough to track a moving receiver in real time.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A small IRA array can provide spatial degrees of freedom comparable to much larger fixed arrays, cutting RF chains and signal-processing overhead.
Real-time boresight tracking keeps received signal quality stable across a wide azimuth range where a fixed antenna's SNR drops sharply.
Independent boresight control lets one array separate sensing, communication, and computation beams in space, reducing cross-task interference.
Boresight optimization with discrete rotation states is non-convex and NP-hard in general, so practical systems need relaxation or heuristic search.
Sensing, communication, and computation compete for shared time, angle, power, and frequency resources, so task-prioritized or Pareto-optimal coordination is needed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the experiment's sensing comes from LiDAR rather than from the same radio waveform used for communication, the result actually demonstrates 'rotatable antenna with external sensing feedback' more than a fully integrated ISCC link; closing that gap would require echo-based angle estimation on the ISAC signal itself.
The rotation-only design keeps antenna positions fixed, which simplifies channel modeling relative to movable antennas; a natural extension is a hybrid IRA that adds fast electronic beam switching for fine corrections on top of slow mechanical rotation for wide-angle tracking.
The claimed benefits imply a testable scaling law: with M independently rotatable elements, the system should resolve M spatially separated tasks without M full RF chains, a claim that could be checked in a multi-IRA array prototype.
If servo latency is the bottleneck, task scheduling could be reformulated as a predictive control problem that anticipates target motion, which the paper lists as future work rather than a solved design.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Take it as a survey-plus-prototype, not as a demonstration of ISCC. The abstract claims the experiment shows the potential of an IRA-enabled ISCC system, but what the experiment actually shows is a servo-driven directional antenna tracking a receiver with LiDAR-provided angles and holding SNR flat. That is a useful, credible beam-alignment result; it is not integrated sensing, communication, and computation.

What the paper does well: it gives a clear taxonomy of sensing-, communication-, and computation-oriented ISCC tasks, and it discusses the main design issues (orientation-dependent channel modeling, interference management, boresight optimization, and performance trade-offs) in a way that is easy for a newcomer to follow. The prototype section is simple and reproducible in principle.

The soft spots are real, and the stress-test note is on target. The sensing function is performed by LiDAR, not by the same radio waveform; the computation function is just a PC running the control loop, with no offloading latency, no inference accuracy, no computation rate reported. No error bars, no repeated trials, no comparison with movable antennas, fluid antennas, or a fixed phased array. So the broad claim in the title and abstract overreaches the evidence. The novelty is also moderate: the IRA concept, channel modeling, and earlier prototypes come from the authors' own preprints (refs [8]-[11]); this paper adds the ISCC framing and a task taxonomy. That is a legitimate extension, but it should be presented as a vision paper with a preliminary beam-tracking demo, not as a verified ISCC result.

Who is this for: someone entering the flexible-antenna or ISCC area who wants a compact overview and pointers to the previous IRA work. It is not a paper that changes any technical conclusion in wireless systems.

Recommendation: send it to peer review, but insist the authors either (a) run a demonstration where the same radio signal performs sensing, communication, and reports a measurable computation task, or (b) rewrite the experimental section and abstract to claim only beam alignment with external localization and aim the paper as a review/challenges article. The taxonomy is worth preserving; the current abstract overstates the evidence.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an intelligent rotatable antenna (IRA) as a spatial-degree-of-freedom enabler for integrated sensing, communication, and computation (ISCC) in 6G networks. It reviews IRA hardware architectures (mechanical, electrical, and hybrid), lists benefits for sensing, communication, and computation, classifies task-oriented ISCC systems, discusses design challenges (channel modeling, interference management, boresight optimization, and performance trade-offs), and reports an indoor prototype in which a servo-rotated directional antenna at 5.8 GHz uses LiDAR-derived angle-of-arrival information to track a fixed-antenna receiver. The experimental result compares received SNR versus azimuth angle for the IRA-based transmitter against a fixed-antenna transmitter, showing a more stable SNR for the rotatable antenna.

Significance. If the ISCC integration were actually demonstrated, the paper would make a useful contribution by highlighting a low-hardware-complexity alternative to large fixed arrays, with clear potential for spatial task decoupling. The survey portions are clear, well-structured, and cover a sensible set of design issues and candidate solutions. The prototype is a valuable first step for mechanical beam tracking, and the paper explicitly provides a quantitative SNR comparison (Fig. 5), which is more than many position papers offer. However, the experimental section validates only external-localization-aided beam steering; it does not demonstrate radio sensing, dual-functional waveforms, or computation offloading. The abstract's and conclusion's claims that the experiments demonstrate great potential for an IRA-enabled ISCC system therefore overreach the presented evidence. The underlying technology and framework remain plausible and worth reporting with appropriate caveats, so the paper is correctable through revision.

major comments (3)

[Section IV, Fig. 5] The experiment described in Section IV is not an integrated sensing, communication, and computation loop. Sensing is performed by an external LiDAR ('The LiDAR mounted on the TX detects the position of the RX'), the communication link is a separate USRP transmission, and 'computation' is a PC control step with no reported task metric (no offloading latency, inference accuracy, or computation rate). Consequently, Fig. 5 demonstrates that a servo-driven directional antenna can maintain received SNR when a receiver's azimuth is varied, but it does not support the abstract's claim that 'experimental results are provided to demonstrate the great potential of IRA-enabled ISCC system.' I recommend either reframing Section IV as a beam-tracking prototype with external sensing and explicitly stating that radio sensing and computation integration are future work, or adding a radio-echo sensing step and a computation task with measured metrics.
[Sections II-B and III] Several load-bearing performance claims, such as 'IRA can significantly enhance the computation efficiency and responsiveness' and 'IRA significantly contributes to task-level performance optimization,' are supported only by qualitative reasoning and by refs. [8]–[11], which are primarily the authors' own preprints. The manuscript provides no analytical result, simulation, or independent benchmark that quantifies the gains of IRA over fixed arrays, movable antennas, or fluid antenna systems. Because the central contribution is an ISCC framework built on these asserted gains, the paper should either include a quantitative comparison (even a simple array-gain or coverage analysis) or explicitly label these as previously reported results and open research hypotheses rather than demonstrated properties of the proposed framework.
[Section IV (experimental methodology)] The experimental evaluation lacks the measurement detail needed to assess the 'stable SNR' claim in Fig. 5: no error bars or repeated trials are reported, the antenna's radiation pattern (gain, half-power beamwidth, sidelobe level) is not specified, and the servo rotation speed and control-loop latency are not given. It is also unclear whether the receiver moved continuously or was placed at discrete azimuth positions. These details matter because the claims of 'dynamic' tracking and 'real-time sensing feedback' depend on the closed-loop time constant and angular resolution, neither of which is characterized.

minor comments (5)

[Section II-C] The phrase 'In this regards' should be 'In this regard.'
[Section IV] '16-quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM)' should be written as '16-ary quadrature amplitude modulation (16-QAM)' or simply '16-QAM' to avoid ambiguity about the modulation order.
[Fig. 5] The azimuth angle axis in Fig. 5 should specify units (radians or degrees) and the receiver positions should be clearly indicated, especially if the measurement was done at discrete angles rather than by continuous motion.
[References] Refs. [8]–[11] are arXiv preprints that carry much of the technical justification for IRA benefits; if the manuscript is intended for archival publication, consider updating to peer-reviewed versions where available, and make explicit which results in the present paper are new versus drawn from those preprints.
[Section III-A] The statement that 'the absence of standard datasets for IRA system remains an unresolved issue' is a useful observation; citing existing beam-forming or sensing dataset efforts would help readers act on it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the paper is a qualitative framework/review with a self-contained beam-tracking demo; self-citations are contextual, not load-bearing reductions.

full rationale

The paper makes no mathematical derivation whose output equals its input. Its central claims are qualitative proposals that IRA rotation can improve SNR, coverage, and spatial adaptability in ISCC. These are supported by references [8]-[11], which include the authors' own preprints, but the article does not reduce any result to those citations: no uniqueness theorem, no fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction, and no equation-level self-reference. The experiment in Section IV is a self-contained measurement of received SNR versus azimuth for a servo-rotated directional antenna versus a fixed antenna. The reported SNR stability follows from mechanically aligning a high-gain antenna to a LiDAR-estimated AoA; that is a physical demonstration of beam tracking, not a circular derivation. The main weakness is scope, not circularity: sensing is performed by an external LiDAR rather than the radio signal, and computation is a PC control loop with no task metric, so the demo does not substantiate an integrated ISCC loop. This is a correctness/overreach concern and should be scored under validity, not under circularity. Self-citations to the IRA preprints are present but contextual; in a magazine-style review, citing prior work by the same group to define an emerging technology is normal and does not constitute load-bearing circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No fitted parameters are used; the article is a qualitative review plus a single hardware demo. The axioms capture unquantified assumptions about hardware agility and about substituting LiDAR for radio sensing.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Radiation pattern and intrinsic parameters remain constant while boresight is rotated
Section II-A; no antenna pattern measurements or modeling provided.
domain assumption Servo-controlled rotation can track a moving receiver fast and accurately enough
Section IV; no timing, latency, or accuracy data.
ad hoc to paper AoA information from an external LiDAR sensor can substitute for radio sensing in the ISCC loop
Section IV; the prototype does not implement radio sensing.
domain assumption Spatially decoupling tasks with independent boresight directions improves ISCC performance
Section II-C; qualitative, with no multi-task experiment.

invented entities (1)

Intelligent Rotatable Antenna (IRA) as a new system concept
purpose: To provide dynamic 3D boresight control for directional antennas in ISCC systems
IRA is framed as new but is a combination of existing mechanically and electronically steered antennas; cited prototypes are same-author preprints, not independent validation.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Intelligent Rotatable Antenna for Integrated Sensing, Communication, and Computation: Challenges and Opportunities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7JSDCUAT

@misc{pith2026250613586,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Intelligent Rotatable Antenna for Integrated Sensing, Communication, and Computation: Challenges and Opportunities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7JSDCUAT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.13586}
}

read the original abstract

Integrated sensing, communication, and computation (ISCC) has emerged as a promising paradigm for enabling intelligent services in future sixth-generation (6G) networks. However, existing ISCC systems based on fixed-antenna architectures inherently lack spatial adaptability to cope with the signal degradation and dynamic environmental conditions. Recently, non-fixed flexible antenna architectures, such as fluid antenna system (FAS), movable antenna (MA), and pinching antenna, have garnered significant interest. Among them, intelligent rotatable antenna (IRA) is an emerging technology that offers significant potential to better support the comprehensive services of target sensing, data transmission, and edge computing. This article investigates a novel IRA-enabled ISCC framework to enhance received signal strength, wider coverage, and spatial adaptability to dynamic wireless environments by flexibly adjusting the boresight of directional antennas. Building upon this, we introduce the fundamentals of IRA technology and explore IRA's benefits for improving system performance while providing potential task-oriented applications. Then, we discuss the main design issues and provide solutions for implementing IRA-based ISCC systems. Finally, experimental results are provided to demonstrate the great potential of IRA-enabled ISCC system, thus paving the way for more robust and efficient future wireless networks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.13586 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Architectures of IRA. bility of IRA enables task-driven allocation of spatial resources, thus facilitating efficient scheduling of directional beams for optimized ISCC systems. The aforementioned benefits of IRA motivate us to further explore and unlock the full potential of IRA in ISCC networks. Therefore, this article provides a comprehensive review of IRA-enabled ISCC systems, focusing on their fundamental princ… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** IRA-enabled ISCC system. lution by enabling real-time directional control and spatial task separation, thereby significantly enhancing environmental adaptability, spatial resource efficiency, and system robustness under dynamic conditions. The core idea of IRA-enabled ISCC system is to flexibly reconfigure IRA’s boresight direction for creating more favorable channel conditions and increasing the probability of lin… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Prototype of IRA-enabled ISCC system. sensing resolution might reduce the available capacity for computational task offloading. This results in a multi-task competition for resources such as time, angle, power, and frequency. Moreover, practical ISCC applications with …

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Constellation graphs and the received SNR versus azimuth angle of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

[8]

Rotatable antenna enabled wire- less communication: Modeling and optimization,

B. Zheng, Q. Wu, and R. Zhang, “Rotatable antenna enabled wire- less communication: Modeling and optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02595, 2025

arXiv 2025
[11]

A Demo of Radar Sensing Aided Rotatable Antenna for Wireless Communication System

Q. Dai, B. Zheng, Q. Wang, X. Xiong, X. Shao, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “A demo of radar sensing aided rotatable antenna for wireless commu- nication system,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.21036 , 2025

work page Pith review arXiv 2025
[1]

Holistic network virtualization and pervasive network intelligence for 6G,

X. Shen, J. Gao, W. Wu, M. Li, C. Zhou, and W. Zhuang, “Holistic network virtualization and pervasive network intelligence for 6G,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 1st. Quart. 2022

work page 2022
[2]

Pushing AI to wireless network edge: An overview on integrated sensing, communication, and computation towards 6G,

G. Zhu, Z. Lyu, X. Jiao, P. Liu, M. Chen, J. Xu, S. Cui, and P. Zhang, “Pushing AI to wireless network edge: An overview on integrated sensing, communication, and computation towards 6G,” Sci. China Inf. Sci, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1–19, Feb. 2023

work page 2023
[3]

Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,

L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6234–6250, Jun. 2023

work page 2023
[4]

Fluid antenna systems,

K.-K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, Mar. 2020

work page 1950
[5]

Flexible-position MIMO for wireless communications: Fundamentals, challenges, and future directions,

J. Zheng, J. Zhang, H. Du, D. Niyato, S. Sun, B. Ai, and K. B. Letaief, “Flexible-position MIMO for wireless communications: Fundamentals, challenges, and future directions,” IEEE Wireless Commun., pp. 18–26, Mar. 2024

work page 2024
[6]

Movable antennas for wireless commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,

L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable antennas for wireless commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 114–120, Jun. 2024

2024

Show all 15 references

[7]

6D movable antenna based on user distribution: Modeling and optimization,

X. Shao, Q. Jiang, and R. Zhang, “6D movable antenna based on user distribution: Modeling and optimization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 355–370, Jan. 2025

2025
[9]

Rotatable antenna enabled wireless communication and sensing: Opportunities and challenges,

B. Zheng, T. Ma, C. You, J. Tang, R. Schober, and R. Zhang, “Rotatable antenna enabled wireless communication and sensing: Opportunities and challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16828 , 2025

2025 arXiv
[10]

Rotatable antenna enabled wireless communication system with visual recognition: A prototype implementation,

L. Dai, B. Zheng, Y . Tan, L. Zhu, F. Chen, and R. Zhang, “Rotatable antenna enabled wireless communication system with visual recognition: A prototype implementation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17097 , 2025

2025 arXiv
[12]

A V-band micromachined 2-D beam-steering antenna driven by magnetic force with polymer-based hinges,

C.-W. Baek, S. Song, J.-H. Park, S. Lee, J.-M. Kim, W. Choi, C. Cheon, Y .-K. Kim, and Y . Kwon, “A V-band micromachined 2-D beam-steering antenna driven by magnetic force with polymer-based hinges,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 325–331, Jan. 2003

2003
[13]

Beam-switching antennas for 5G millimeter-wave wireless terminals,

K. M. Morshed, D. K. Karmokar, K. P. Esselle, and L. Matekovits, “Beam-switching antennas for 5G millimeter-wave wireless terminals,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 14, p. 6285, Jul. 2023

2023
[14]

Electronically steered metasurface antenna,

M. Boyarsky, T. Sleasman, M. F. Imani, J. N. Gollub, and D. R. Smith, “Electronically steered metasurface antenna,” Sci. Rep. , vol. 11, no. 1, p. 4693, Feb. 2021

2021
[15]

A survey on integrated sensing, communication, and computation,

D. Wen, Y . Zhou, X. Li, Y . Shi, K. Huang, and K. B. Letaief, “A survey on integrated sensing, communication, and computation,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, Dec. 2024, Early access. BIOGRAPHIES Xue Xiong (ftxuexiong@mail.scut.edu.cn) is with the School of Future Technology, ...

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [8]

Rotatable antenna enabled wire- less communication: Modeling and optimization,

B. Zheng, Q. Wu, and R. Zhang, “Rotatable antenna enabled wire- less communication: Modeling and optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02595, 2025

arXiv 2025

[2] [11]

A Demo of Radar Sensing Aided Rotatable Antenna for Wireless Communication System

Q. Dai, B. Zheng, Q. Wang, X. Xiong, X. Shao, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “A demo of radar sensing aided rotatable antenna for wireless commu- nication system,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.21036 , 2025

work page Pith review arXiv 2025

[3] [1]

Holistic network virtualization and pervasive network intelligence for 6G,

X. Shen, J. Gao, W. Wu, M. Li, C. Zhou, and W. Zhuang, “Holistic network virtualization and pervasive network intelligence for 6G,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 1st. Quart. 2022

work page 2022

[4] [2]

Pushing AI to wireless network edge: An overview on integrated sensing, communication, and computation towards 6G,

G. Zhu, Z. Lyu, X. Jiao, P. Liu, M. Chen, J. Xu, S. Cui, and P. Zhang, “Pushing AI to wireless network edge: An overview on integrated sensing, communication, and computation towards 6G,” Sci. China Inf. Sci, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1–19, Feb. 2023

work page 2023

[5] [3]

Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,

L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6234–6250, Jun. 2023

work page 2023

[6] [4]

Fluid antenna systems,

K.-K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, Mar. 2020

work page 1950

[7] [5]

Flexible-position MIMO for wireless communications: Fundamentals, challenges, and future directions,

J. Zheng, J. Zhang, H. Du, D. Niyato, S. Sun, B. Ai, and K. B. Letaief, “Flexible-position MIMO for wireless communications: Fundamentals, challenges, and future directions,” IEEE Wireless Commun., pp. 18–26, Mar. 2024

work page 2024

[8] [6]

Movable antennas for wireless commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,

L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable antennas for wireless commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 114–120, Jun. 2024

2024