REVIEW 2 cited by
Understanding GUI Agent Localization Biases through Logit Sharpness
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have enabled GUI agents to interact with operating systems by grounding language into spatial actions. Despite their promising performance, these models frequently exhibit hallucinations-systematic localization errors that compromise reliability. We propose a fine-grained evaluation framework that categorizes model predictions into four distinct types, revealing nuanced failure modes beyond traditional accuracy metrics. To better quantify model uncertainty, we introduce the Peak Sharpness Score (PSS), a metric that evaluates the alignment between semantic continuity and logits distribution in coordinate prediction. Building on this insight, we further propose Context-Aware Cropping, a training-free technique that improves model performance by adaptively refining input context. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework and methods provide actionable insights and enhance the interpretability and robustness of GUI agent behavior.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Routing Is Least Learnable Where It Is Most Valuable: Bounds on Representation Routing for Web Agents
Per-task routing between text, image, and hybrid observations of a browser page does not currently beat one fixed choice, because the labels needed to learn routing exist only where the agent already succeeds; only a ...
-
DiMo-GUI: Advancing Test-time Scaling in GUI Grounding via Modality-Aware Visual Reasoning
Separating text and icon grounding with iterative zooming improves GUI-element localization accuracy of existing vision-language models without retraining.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.