Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Kinematic Imprints of vortex-lines of BEC Dark Matter on Baryonic Matter

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dark matter vortex lines can seed gas condensation and leave ring imprints on baryons.

desk verdict The paper adds a genuinely new coupled simulation—vortex line plus baryonic gas—but the ring-like 'imprint' claim rests on an unmatched no-vortex control and an internal contradiction about which mass ratio condenses gas best. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.17535 v1 pith:KQNOTGTL submitted 2025-06-21 astro-ph.GA

Iván Álvarez-Rios , Carlos Tena-Contreras , Francisco S. Guzmán This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords Bose-EinsteincondensatedarkmattervortexlinesGross-Pitaevskii-Poisson-EulersystembaryonicgascondensationidealmodelLaplacian-of-Gaussianfilterself-interactinggalaxymorphology
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that quantized vortex lines in Bose-Einstein Condensate dark matter (BECDM) are not passive curiosities: when baryonic matter is modeled as a gravitationally coupled compressible ideal gas, the vortex's gravity pulls that gas into a localized concentration, and the gas retains a ring-shaped morphological imprint of the vortex that survives nonlinear evolution. The authors claim this happens even with no imposed symmetry or rotation, starting from a randomly distributed gas. They also find that condensation is most efficient when the gas dominates the total mass and has low initial velocity dispersion, and that strong bosonic self-interaction can destabilize rather than protect the vortex. These are numerical results from simulations of the Gross-Pitaevskii-Poisson-Euler system, not analytic proofs.

What carries the argument

The central object is a self-consistent vortex-line solution of the stationary Gross-Pitaevskii-Poisson (GPP) equations with winding number m = 1, embedded in a three-dimensional periodic domain and coupled through the Poisson equation to an ideal gas obeying the Euler equations, forming the full GPPE system. The vortex's vanishing central density and quantized circulation create a gravitational potential structure that funnels nearby gas. To detect the vortex's imprint, the paper applies the Laplacian-of-Gaussian (LoG) filter, a standard edge-enhancement technique, to the projected gas density; this isolates ring-like gradients that align spatially with the vortex. The parameter space of self-interaction strength, mass ratio between condensate and gas, and maximum initial gas velocity is what produces the map of stable versus unstable regimes.

What would settle it

Run equivalent GPPE simulations with realistic baryonic physics—cooling, heating, magnetic fields, and star-formation feedback—and compare LoG-filtered gas maps; if the ring-like features disappear or no longer align with vortex locations, the proposed observational tracer would fail. Alternatively, search high-resolution HI images of dwarf and low-surface-brightness galaxies for ring- or crescent-shaped features centered on dark-matter-dominated cores; absence of such features in systems where vortices are expected, or identical features in collisionless-CDM control simulations, would falsify the claim that rings distinguish vortices.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a vortex line in BECDM acts as a gravitational seed for baryonic matter. Despite a randomly seeded, initially homogeneous gas distribution with no global rotation or symmetry, the ideal gas collapses preferentially around the vortex core for all tested mass ratios, forming a persistent quasi-stationary concentration. The authors identify a specific morphological tracer: in Laplacian-of-Gaussian-filtered equatorial density maps, the gas shows ring- or crescent-shaped features aligned with the BECDM vortex isocontours, features that are absent in a spherically symmetric no-vortex control. They also report a regime map: stability and imprint are strongest for moderate self-interaction strength (g = 1), for gas-dominated or comparable mass ratios, and for lower initial velocity dispersion; at g = 100 most configurations become dynamically unstable. The paper concludes that vortex lines are dynamical attractors that can influence baryonic evolution and are potentially testable through luminous tracers.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing modeling assumption is that baryonic matter behaves as an inviscid, non-radiating ideal gas with a polytropic equation of state and no cooling, star formation, magnetic fields, or feedback, so if a realistic interstellar medium responds differently, the claimed vortex imprint and condensation need not survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If vortex lines are present in BECDM halos, surrounding baryonic gas will develop localized overdensities at vortex cores, making vortices active agents in structuring luminous matter.
  • Ring-like or crescent-shaped features in high-resolution projected gas maps become a candidate observational signature of quantum vortices in dark matter halos.
  • Observational searches should target gas-dominated, low-velocity-dispersion systems such as dwarf and low-surface-brightness galaxies, where the imprint is predicted to be strongest.
  • Strong bosonic self-interaction, often assumed to stabilize vortices, can instead trigger dynamical instabilities when coupled to baryonic collapse, so stability predictions for self-interacting BECDM should be revisited in coupled environments.
  • Because the gas imprint survives nonlinear evolution, it could provide indirect constraints on the boson mass and vortex prevalence in BECDM halos.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension the authors do not make: if vortices seed persistent gas concentrations, they could act as preferential sites for star or cluster formation, meaning BECDM vortices might leave imprints in stellar populations, not just gas maps.
  • The simulations use a non-radiating ideal gas with no cooling, magnetic fields, or star-formation feedback; in a realistic interstellar medium, cooling could amplify condensation while feedback could disrupt it, so repeating the runs with a more complete baryonic physics package is a natural test of whether the ring signature survives.
  • The paper's no-vortex control uses a different homogeneous setup, so the cleanest falsification of the tracer would be a matched control: the same random-phase gas distribution around a spherical, non-rotating BECDM core of equal mass, filtered identically.
  • The vortex lines are initialized, not formed self-consistently from rotating halo collapse, so these observable consequences apply only to BECDM models in which such vortices actually form, as earlier work suggests requires repulsive self-interaction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the nonlinear evolution of a vortex-line configuration in Bose-Einstein Condensate Dark Matter (BECDM) gravitationally coupled to an inviscid, non-radiating ideal gas (IG). The authors solve the dimensionless Gross-Pitaevskii-Poisson-Euler (GPPE) system with their CAFE-FDM code, initializing a self-consistent m=1 vortex line (Appendix A) and a gas with random-phase density and random velocity fields (Eq. 19). They run 12 simulations varying the self-interaction strength g (1 and 100), the mass ratio MBEC/MIG (0.1, 1, and 10), and the maximum initial gas speed vm (0.5 and 1.0), and diagnose stability through maximum densities, energy components, and virial quantities. The central claims are that vortex lines remain dynamically stable under baryonic perturbations, that they act as gravitational seeds inducing localized gas condensation, and that they leave persistent ring-like morphological signatures in Laplacian-of-Gaussian (LoG)-filtered projected gas density maps (Appendix B), potentially serving as an observational probe of BECDM.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper would provide a concrete, falsifiable baryonic observable for vortex structures in BECDM, a topic that has been mostly confined to dark-matter-only studies. The paper has clear strengths: it works directly from the coupled GPPE system, explores a nontrivial parameter space, includes diagnostics beyond snapshots, explicitly constructs the vortex initial condition, and attempts a control test in Appendix B. The work is also largely parameter-free in the sense that no constants are fitted to data, and the code and equations are stated with enough detail to be reproduced. However, the significance is currently limited by the idealized gas model (no cooling, star formation, magnetic fields, or feedback) and, more importantly, by the absence of a matched no-vortex control, which leaves the causal role of the vortex unproven. The contradiction between the abstract's efficiency claim and the body's mass-ratio dependence further weakens the quantitative takeaway.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix B / Section III.B] The no-vortex control reported in Appendix B is not a matched control and therefore does not isolate the causal role of the vortex. The production runs initialize the gas with a random-phase density field (Eq. 19) and a random velocity field with |v| ≤ vm, whereas the Appendix B control uses a homogeneous gas and a spherically symmetric, non-vortex condensate that evolves into a fermion-boson star. Because the control differs from the vortex runs in the gas initialization, the velocity dispersion, and the global symmetry, the absence of ring-like features in Figure 12 could be due to the imposed spherical symmetry or the different gas state rather than to the absence of a vortex. Since all 12 production runs contain a vortex line, no simulation in the paper isolates the vortex contribution while holding gas randomness, mass ratio, and velocity dispersion fixed; this is the load-bearing gap for the central claim that vortex lines 'act as gravitational seeds' and drive the morphological signature.
  2. [Abstract and Section III.B] The paper's efficiency claim is internally inconsistent. The abstract states that gas condensation is 'most efficient when the IG mass dominates over the BECDM' (MBEC/MIG = 0.1), but Section III.B states that the gas settles into a higher equilibrium central density for larger mass ratios MBEC/MIG, and Section III.C and the Conclusions attribute the most efficient condensation to the most massive and stable condensate (MBEC/MIG = 10). The maximum-density curves in Figure 2 should in principle resolve this, but the text never defines what is meant by 'efficiency.' As written, the abstract's quantitative efficiency claim is not supported by the diagnostics presented and directly contradicts the body of the paper.
  3. [Section III.B, Figures 3-4, Appendix B] The claimed ring-like morphological signature is assessed only visually through LoG-filtered maps with a fixed width σ = 1; no quantitative measure is provided of the alignment between the filtered features and the vortex core, nor of the statistical significance relative to random or inhomogeneous non-vortex fields. The control in Figure 12 is likewise evaluated visually. A quantitative diagnostic—for example, the azimuthal correlation between the LoG response and the BECDM density contours, a matched-filter significance computation, or a comparison against a set of random-phase no-vortex runs—is needed to establish the 'persistent morphological signature' that is central to the paper's observational claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II.E] The physical mapping of the dimensionless parameters is incomplete: the boson mass m22 and scale λ appear in the scaling factors of Section II.B, but the paper never states which (m22, λ) values correspond to the simulations, making it difficult to judge whether the domain L=80, resolution N=128, and filter width σ=1 represent a realistic galactic scale. Please provide the conversion or explicitly state that the results are scale-free within the adopted rescalings.
  2. [Section II.C] The random-phase construction in Eq. (19) yields a Gaussian-random-field gas density whose spatial correlation length is not discussed; a sentence on the correlation scale and its relation to the domain size and vortex core would aid reproducibility and interpretation.
  3. [Appendix B] The control run is described only by reference to [32]; the initial gas and condensate parameters for that run should be listed explicitly so the reader can verify which variables are held equal to the vortex runs and which are changed.
  4. [Abstract] The phrase 'in the absence of imposed symmetries or rotation' is misleading because the initial vortex ansatz in Eq. (18) imposes axial symmetry on the condensate; clarify that the statement refers to the gas component only.
  5. [General] Minor typographical issues include 'v ortex' in Section IV and inconsistent spacing in 'M BEC/MIG' in Appendix B; these do not affect the physics.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the vortex-seeding and ring-signature claims are outputs of a self-contained numerical integration, not reductions of the inputs; the unmatched no-vortex control is a validity limitation, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's chain is: specify the GPPE equations (12)-(17), construct a stationary vortex solution (Eq. 18 and Appendix A) and a random-phase gas (Eq. 19), evolve numerically for 12 parameter choices, and diagnose gas condensation and LoG-filtered morphology. No parameter is fitted to the output being predicted, and no 'prediction' is mathematically forced by the definitions: the gas could in principle fail to condense or could condense at locations unrelated to the vortex, and the LoG filter is applied to the actual evolved density rather than to a quantity built from the vortex phase. Self-citations to the CAFE-FDM code [30,37] and gas-initialization prescription [32] are methodological and not load-bearing for the central claim. The main weakness is the Appendix B control: it differs from the vortex runs in gas initialization and symmetry, so it does not fully isolate the vortex as the cause of the ring morphology. This is a control/validity issue, not a circularity, and under the rules it is not counted as a circular step. The internal discrepancy about which mass ratio gives most efficient condensation (abstract vs Sec. III.B) is likewise an inconsistency, not a circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted constants and no new particles or forces are introduced; the free parameters are hand-chosen initial-condition values. The main unstated burdens are the ideal-gas modeling for baryons, single-realization sampling, boundary-condition adequacy, and the suitability of the no-vortex control baseline.

free parameters (7)
  • Self-interaction strength g = 1 and 100
    Two values chosen to test the effect of repulsive bosonic self-interaction on vortex stability; central to the stability findings in Section II.E.
  • Mass ratio MBEC/MIG = 0.1, 1, 10
    Chosen initial ratios spanning gas-dominated to BECDM-dominated systems; the reported condensation efficiency depends on this ratio.
  • Maximum initial gas speed vm = 0.5 and 1.0
    Controls the initial kinetic energy of the baryonic gas; low-dispersion cases are said to condense more efficiently.
  • Polytropic constant K = 0.1
    Sets the initial gas internal energy scale and is held fixed across all runs.
  • Vortex winding number m = 1
    Set to the most stable and energetically favorable configuration; only m=1 is explored, per Section II.E.
  • LoG filter width sigma = 1
    Hand-picked spatial scale for the claimed ring detection in Appendix B; the morphological tracer is defined by this choice.
  • BECDM core mass MBEC = 18.85
    Fixed dimensionless mass of the initial vortex solution; all mass ratios are defined relative to it.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Baryonic matter is adequately modeled by the Euler equations for an inviscid ideal gas with a polytropic equation of state, with no cooling, star formation, magnetic fields, or feedback.
    Used throughout Section II.A; the claimed observational tracer is calculated within this idealized model.
  • domain assumption A single random-phase realization per parameter set is sufficient to draw the qualitative conclusions.
    The initial gas field is generated from random phases (Eq. 19), but no ensemble averaging or seed variation is reported.
  • ad hoc to paper The Appendix B no-vortex control, which evolves a homogeneous gas and a non-vortex condensate into a fermion-boson star, adequately isolates the vortex-induced signature.
    This control differs from the vortex runs in initial symmetry and in the presence of a vortex line, so it does not separate the vortex degree of freedom from the effect of any central mass concentration.
  • domain assumption Periodic boundary conditions on a cube of side L=80 do not materially alter the collapse or vortex dynamics.
    All runs use periodic FFT-based Poisson and periodic gas evolution; no boundary-convergence study is shown for the coupled runs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kinematic Imprints of vortex-lines of BEC Dark Matter on Baryonic Matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KQNOTGTL

@misc{pith2026250617535,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kinematic Imprints of vortex-lines of BEC Dark Matter on Baryonic Matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KQNOTGTL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.17535}
}
read the original abstract

Our results demonstrate that vortex lines in Bose-Einstein Condensate Dark Matter (BECDM) can act as gravitational seeds that induce the condensation of baryonic matter, leading to localized gas accumulation even in the absence of imposed symmetries or rotation. Our analysis is based on the numerical solution of the system of equations for the BECDM gravitationally coupled to Euler equations for a compressible ideal gas (IG) that we use as a model of baryonic matter. Numerical simulations are constructed for various scenarios that start with a vortex solution for the BECDM and a randomly distributed ideal gas, with the aim of investigating whether the matter distribution and dynamics of the vortex influences the dynamics and distribution of the gas. We find that the gas condensation process is most efficient when the IG mass dominates over the BECDM, and when the IG has low initial velocity dispersion. We also find that strong bosonic self-interaction does not guarantee the vortex stability, instead, it can trigger dynamical instabilities that disrupt both the vortex structure and the surrounding gas. An interesting finding is that the vortex drives a persistent morphological signature on the gas, often in the form of ring-like features visible in projected density maps. These patterns survive nonlinear evolution and may serve as indirect tracers of vortex structures in BECDM halos, potentially offering a novel and testable observational probe of the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.17535 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Evolution of a vortex-line configuration embedded [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Time evolution of the maximum densities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG)-filtered density maps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Evolution of the energy components and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Evolution of the energy components and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Radial profiles of the wave function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Radial profiles of the normalized wave function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Radial profiles of the wave function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Application of the Laplacian-of-Gaussian (LoG) fil [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Laplacian-of-Gaussian filter applied to a spherically [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Vortex-reconnection energy bounds in Bose-Einstein-condensed and superfluid dark matter halos

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Vortex reconnections in BEC/superfluid dark matter halos produce dark-sector heating at a rate that is secular but sub-virial for relaxed non-interacting soliton cores, with the dominant uncertainty being the true vor...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    C. J. Pethick and H. Smith, Bose–Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases , 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2008)

    2008

  2. [2]

    Rotating trapped bose–einstein conden- sates,

    A. L. Fetter, “Rotating trapped bose–einstein conden- sates,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 647 (2009)

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Vortices in a bose-einstein condensate,

    M. R. Matthews, B. P. Anderson, P. C. Haljan, D. S. Hall, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, “Vortices in a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2498– 2501 (1999)

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    Watching dark solitons decay into vortex rings in a bose-einstein condensate,

    B. P. Anderson, P. C. Haljan, C. A. Regal, D. L. Feder, L. A. Collins, C. W. Clark, and E. A. Cornell, “Watching dark solitons decay into vortex rings in a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2926–2929 (2001)

    2001

  5. [5]

    Imprint- ing vortices in a bose-einstein condensate using topolog- ical phases,

    A. E. Leanhardt, A. G¨ orlitz, A. P. Chikkatur, D. Kielpin- ski, Y. Shin, D. E. Pritchard, and W. Ketterle, “Imprint- ing vortices in a bose-einstein condensate using topolog- ical phases,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 190403 (2002)

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Spontaneous symmetry breaking in a quenched ferromagnetic spinor bose–einstein condensate,

    L. E. Sadler, J. M. Higbie, S. R. Leslie, M. Ven- galattore, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, “Spontaneous symmetry breaking in a quenched ferromagnetic spinor bose–einstein condensate,” Nature 443, 312–315 (2006)

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Rapidly rotating bose-einstein condensates in and near the lowest landau level,

    V. Schweikhard, I. Coddington, P. Engels, V. P. Mogen- dorff, and E. A. Cornell, “Rapidly rotating bose-einstein condensates in and near the lowest landau level,” Phys. 9 Rev. Lett. 92, 040404 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Quintessence and scalar dark matter in the Universe,

    T. Matos and L. A. Ure˜ na-L´ opez, “Quintessence and scalar dark matter in the Universe,” Classical and Quan- tum Gravity 17, L75–L81 (2000), astro-ph/0004332

    arXiv 2000

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    New cosmological model of quintessence and dark matter,

    Varun Sahni and Limin Wang, “New cosmological model of quintessence and dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 62, 103517 (2000)

    2000

  2. [10]

    Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Par- ticles,

    W. Hu, R. Barkana, and A. Gruzinov, “Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Par- ticles,” Physical Review Letters 85, 1158–1161 (2000), astro-ph/0003365

    2000 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter,

    Lam Hui, Jeremiah P. Ostriker, Scott Tremaine, and Edward Witten, “Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 95, 043541 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Axion dark matter, solitons and the cusp-core problem,

    David J. E. Marsh and Ana-Roxana Pop, “Axion dark matter, solitons and the cusp-core problem,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 451, 2479–2492 (2015), arXiv:1502.03456 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Bose-Einstein condensation of dark matter solves the core/cusp problem,

    T. Harko, “Bose-Einstein condensation of dark matter solves the core/cusp problem,” JCAP 1105, 022 (2011), arXiv:1105.2996 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Where Are the Missing Galactic Satellites?

    A. Klypin, A. V. Kravtsov, O. Valenzuela, and F. Prada, “Where Are the Missing Galactic Satellites?” apj 522, 82–92 (1999), astro-ph/9901240

    1999 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Cosmic Structure as the Quantum Interference of a Co- herent Dark Wave,

    Hsi-Yu Schive, Tzihong Chiueh, and Tom Broadhurst, “Cosmic Structure as the Quantum Interference of a Co- herent Dark Wave,” Nature Phys. 10, 496–499 (2014a), arXiv:1406.6586 [astro-ph.GA]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Galaxy formation with becdm i. turbu- lence and relaxation of idealized haloes,

    Philip Mocz, Mark Vogelsberger, Victor H. Robles, Jes´ us Zavala, Michael Boylan-Kolchin, Anastasia Fialkov, and Lars Hernquist, “Galaxy formation with becdm i. turbu- lence and relaxation of idealized haloes,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 471, 4559–4570 (2017), arXiv:1705.0584...

    2017 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Stable vortex in bose-einstein condensate dark matter,

    Y. O. Nikolaieva, A. O. Olashyn, Y. I. Kuriatnikov, S. I. Vilchynskii, and A. I. Yakimenko, “Stable vortex in bose-einstein condensate dark matter,” Low Tempera- ture Physics 47, 684–692 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Stable vortex structures in colliding self-gravitating bose-einstein con- densates,

    Y. O. Nikolaieva, Y. M. Bidasyuk, K. Korshynska, E. V. Gorbar, Junji Jia, and A. I. Yakimenko, “Stable vortex structures in colliding self-gravitating bose-einstein con- densates,” Physical Review D 108 (2023), 10.1103/phys- revd.108.023503

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    Cosmic filament spin from dark matter vortices,

    Stephon Alexander, Christian Capanelli, Elisa G. M. Fer- reira, and Evan McDonough, “Cosmic filament spin from dark matter vortices,” Phys. Lett. B 833, 137298 (2022), arXiv:2111.03061 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Angular mo- mentum and vortex formation in bose-einstein-condensed cold dark matter haloes: Angular momentum in bec-cdm haloes,

    Tanja Rindler-Daller and Paul R. Shapiro, “Angular mo- mentum and vortex formation in bose-einstein-condensed cold dark matter haloes: Angular momentum in bec-cdm haloes,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical So- ciety 422, 135–161 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    Angular momentum and the absence of vortices in the cores of fuzzy dark matter haloes,

    Sonja O. Schobesberger, Tanja Rindler-Daller, and Paul R. Shapiro, “Angular momentum and the absence of vortices in the cores of fuzzy dark matter haloes,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 505, 802–829 (2021), arXiv:2101.04958 [astro-ph.GA]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Vortices in bose-einstein condensate dark matter,

    Ben Kain and Hong Y. Ling, “Vortices in bose-einstein condensate dark matter,” Physical Review D 82 (2010), 10.1103/physrevd.82.064042

    2010 doi

  15. [23]

    Scalar dark matter vortex stabilization with black holes,

    Noah Glennon, Anthony E. Mirasola, Nathan Musoke, Mark C. Neyrinck, and Chanda Prescod-Weinstein, “Scalar dark matter vortex stabilization with black holes,” JCAP 07, 004 (2023), arXiv:2301.13220 [astro- ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Revealing turbulent dark matter via merging of self-gravitating condensates,

    Anirudh Sivakumar, Pankaj Kumar Mishra, Ahmad A. Hujeirat, and Paulsamy Muruganandam, “Revealing turbulent dark matter via merging of self-gravitating condensates,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 083511 (2025), arXiv:2501.13689 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Cosmolog- ical constraints on Bose-Einstein-condensed scalar field dark matter,

    B. Li, T. Rindler-Daller, and P. R. Shapiro, “Cosmolog- ical constraints on Bose-Einstein-condensed scalar field dark matter,” prd 89, 083536 (2014), arXiv:1310.6061

    2014 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Understanding the Core-Halo Relation of Quantum Wave Dark Matter from 3D Simulations,

    Hsi-Yu Schive, Ming-Hsuan Liao, Tak-Pong Woo, Shing- Kwong Wong, Tzihong Chiueh, Tom Broadhurst, and W. Y. Pauchy Hwang, “Understanding the Core-Halo Relation of Quantum Wave Dark Matter from 3D Simulations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 261302 (2014), arXiv:1407.7762 [astro-ph.GA]

    2014 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Things: The h i nearby galaxy survey,

    Fabian Walter, Elias Brinks, W. J. G. de Blok, Frank Bigiel, Robert C. Kennicutt, Michele D. Thornley, and Adam Leroy, “Things: The h i nearby galaxy survey,” The Astronomical Journal 136, 2563–2647 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    Little things,

    Deidre A. Hunter, Dana Ficut-Vicas, Trisha Ashley, Elias Brinks, Phil Cigan, Bruce G. Elmegreen, Volker Heesen, Kimberly A. Herrmann, Megan Johnson, Se-Heon Oh, Michael P. Rupen, Andreas Schruba, Caroline E. Simp- son, Fabian Walter, David J. Westpfahl, Lisa M. Young, and Hong...

    2012

  21. [29]

    Oscillation modes of ultralight bec dark matter cores,

    F. S. Guzm´ an, “Oscillation modes of ultralight bec dark matter cores,” Physical Review D 99 (2019), 10.1103/physrevd.99.083513

    2019 doi

  22. [30]

    Explo- ration of simple scenarios involving fuzzy dark matter cores and gas at local scales,

    Iv´ an´Alvarez-Rios and Francisco S Guzm´ an, “Explo- ration of simple scenarios involving fuzzy dark matter cores and gas at local scales,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 518, 3838–3849 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Station- ary solutions of the schr¨ odinger-poisson-euler system and their stability,

    Iv´ an´Alvarez-Rios and Francisco S. Guzm´ an, “Station- ary solutions of the schr¨ odinger-poisson-euler system and their stability,” Physics Letters B 843, 137984 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Fermion-boson stars as attractors in fuzzy dark matter and ideal gas dynamics,

    Ivan Alvarez-Rios, Francisco S. Guzman, and Jens Niemeyer, “Fermion-boson stars as attractors in fuzzy dark matter and ideal gas dynamics,” (2024), arXiv:2412.13382 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  25. [33]

    Construction of ground-state solutions of the gross–pitaevskii–poisson system using genetic algo- rithms,

    Carlos Tena-Contreras, Iv´ an Alvarez-R´ ıos, and Fran- cisco S. Guzm´ an, “Construction of ground-state solutions of the gross–pitaevskii–poisson system using genetic algo- rithms,” Universe 10 (2024), 10.3390/universe10080309

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    Black holes as condensa- tion points of fuzzy dark matter cores,

    Curicaveri Palomares-Chavez, Ivan Alvarez-Rios, and Francisco S. Guzman, “Black holes as condensa- tion points of fuzzy dark matter cores,” (2024), arXiv:2412.15465 [astro-ph.GA]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Gravita- tional bose-einstein condensation in the kinetic regime,

    D. G. Levkov, A. G. Panin, and I. I. Tkachev, “Gravita- tional bose-einstein condensation in the kinetic regime,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 151301 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    New insights into the formation and growth of boson stars in dark matter ha- los,

    Jiajun Chen, Xiaolong Du, Erik W. Lentz, David J. E. Marsh, and Jens C. Niemeyer, “New insights into the formation and growth of boson stars in dark matter ha- los,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 083022 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Effect of boundary conditions on structure for- mation in fuzzy dark matter,

    Iv´ an´Alvarez-Rios, Francisco S. Guzm´ an, and Paul R. Shapiro, “Effect of boundary conditions on structure for- mation in fuzzy dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 107, 123524 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Evolution of the schr¨ odinger-newton system for a self-gravitating scalar field,

    F. S. Guzm´ an and L. Arturo Ure˜ na L´ opez, “Evolution of the schr¨ odinger-newton system for a self-gravitating scalar field,” Phys. Rev. D 69, 124033 (2004). 10

    2004

  31. [39]

    Theory of edge detec- tion,

    David Marr and Ellen Hildreth, “Theory of edge detec- tion,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 207, 187–217 (1980). Appendix A: V ortex Lines: Ground-State Solution We consider the dimensionless, stationary GPP sub- system Eqs. (12) and ...

    1980

  32. [40]

    As m increases, the centrifugal barrier term m2/r2 ⊥ strengthens, widen- ing the central depletion in the density profile and giving 11 FIG

    Impact of the vortex number m The vortex numberm determines the quantized angu- lar momentum of the condensate and has a direct im- pact on the core structure of the vortex. As m increases, the centrifugal barrier term m2/r2 ⊥ strengthens, widen- ing the central depletion in t...

  33. [41]

    For g > 0, the interaction is repulsive, which favors more extended and less concentrated profiles

    Impact of the self-interaction strength g The parameter g governs the strength and nature of self-interactions within the condensate. For g > 0, the interaction is repulsive, which favors more extended and less concentrated profiles. As g increases, the wave func- tion becomes...

  34. [42]

    Higher masses increase the self- gravity of the system, yielding more compact profiles with steeper central peaks

    Impact of the total mass M The total mass M sets the overall normalization of the wave function and controls the gravitational binding of the configuration. Higher masses increase the self- gravity of the system, yielding more compact profiles with steeper central peaks. This ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.