Pseudo-chiral phonon splitting from octupolar magnetic order

Arun Paramekanti; Kathleen Hart; Ruairidh Sutcliffe; Swati Chaudhary

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Pseudo-chiral phonon splitting from octupolar magnetic order

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Hidden octupolar order splits phonon doublets by about 1 meV.

desk verdict A new, plausibly correct proposal for a Raman probe of hidden octupolar order; the FO/AFQ contrast is solid, but the headline 1 meV splitting rests on a self-cited coupling constant and may be optimistic. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.18978 v2 pith:43AQNGJA submitted 2025-06-23 cond-mat.str-el

Ruairidh Sutcliffe , Kathleen Hart , Swati Chaudhary , Arun Paramekanti This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.str-el

keywords pseudo-chiralphononsoctupolarordermultipolarmagnetsphononsplittingRamanspectroscopynon-KramersdoubletBa2CaOsO6PrV2Al20

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that hidden ferro-octupolar order in certain magnets can be detected through the lattice vibrations it leaves behind. The authors study non-Kramers $\Gamma_3$ doublets whose quadrupolar moments couple linearly to the doubly degenerate $E_g$ phonon doublet, and show that ferro-octupolar order splits that doublet into two pseudo-chiral modes separated by about 1 meV, while competing antiferro-quadrupolar order produces only a small redshift that realistic damping hides. The calculation treats fast phonons as living in a static, slowly varying background of pseudospins, and Monte Carlo averages the resulting spectral functions over spin configurations. If correct, Raman spectroscopy of phonons becomes an optical probe of octupolar order in materials such as Ba$_2$CaOsO$_6$ and PrV$_2$Al$_{20}$, whose octupolar order is otherwise difficult to see.

What carries the argument

The mathematical engine is a second-order cumulant expansion of the spin-phonon action, which yields a $2\times2$ local inverse phonon Green function $G^{-1}(r,i\nu_n)$ for the $(Q_x,Q_z)$ doublet at each site. The off-diagonal $G^{-1}_{zx}$ term containing $\gamma_r = 2i\sin\theta_r\sin\phi_r$ is what breaks time reversal and generates the large pseudo-chiral splitting in ferro-octupolar order; because it depends on the direction of the local Weiss field rather than its magnitude, the mode splitting tracks but is not proportional to the octupolar order parameter. The static background of 'slow' pseudospins is described by Holstein-Primakoff bosons rotated into a local frame, and the final spectral functions $A(\omega)$ and pump-probe $A_{\mathrm{pp}}(\omega)$ are obtained by averaging the site-resolved Green functions over Monte Carlo spin configurations.

What would settle it

Measure helicity- and polarization-resolved Raman spectra of the $E_g$ phonon doublet across the ordering transition in a Ba$_2$CaOsO$_6$ single crystal whose octupolar order is independently confirmed by resonant X-ray or NMR. If no two-peak structure with splitting near 1 meV and opposite pseudo-angular-momentum selection rules appears below $T_{\mathrm{FO}}$, the prediction is falsified. Alternatively, a first-principles calculation of $\lambda$ from strain-induced splitting that yields a value well below 5 meV would falsify the quantitative claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the pseudospin-phonon coupling, though linear only in the time-reversal-even quadrupole components, carries a time-reversal-odd imprint once the pseudospins order: in the ferro-octupolar phase the effective inverse phonon Green function develops an off-diagonal term proportional to $\gamma_r = 2i\sin\theta_r\sin\phi_r$, which mixes $Q_x$ and $Q_z$ and produces eigenmodes $Q_\pm = Q_x \pm i Q_z$ with frequencies split by $\Delta\Omega \approx 4\lambda^2/\Omega_0 \approx 1$ meV. The paper shows these modes are pseudo-chiral rather than truly chiral: the oxygen displacements remain linear and carry no circular motion or ordinary angular momentum, but the modes acquire opposite quantized pseudo-angular momentum under threefold rotations about the cubic [111] axes. It further finds that the competing antiferro-quadrupolar ordering splits the doublet by an order of magnitude less, with one mode redshifted by $\approx 0.2$ meV, so the splitting is washed out by realistic phonon damping $2\pi\eta/\Omega_0 \sim 0.07$. The result is proposed as a means to distinguish ferro-octupolar from quadrupolar order and to detect hidden octupolar order in candidate materials.

Load-bearing premise

The predicted observable splitting scales as $\lambda^2/\Omega_0$ with the linear quadrupole-phonon coupling $\lambda \approx 5$ meV; if the true coupling is smaller, or if the candidate material orders antiferro-quadrupolar rather than ferro-octupolar, the splitting shrinks below the phonon linewidth and the proposed probe goes silent.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A Raman experiment below $T_{\mathrm{FO}}$ in Ba$_2$CaOsO$_6$ should show two resolvable $E_g$ peaks split by roughly 1 meV even with realistic damping, whereas the competing AFQ phase would show a single broadened peak; phonon spectra can therefore discriminate the two orders.
The split modes $Q_\pm = Q_x \pm iQ_z$ carry opposite pseudo-angular momentum along the cubic body diagonals, which imposes distinguishable selection rules in helicity- or polarization-resolved Raman scattering.
The temperature dependence of the splitting tracks the octupolar order parameter qualitatively but is not proportional to it, because the splitting comes from local Weiss-field directions; this offers an explanation for similar order-parameter-versus-splitting discrepancies seen in dipolar magnets.
An optical pump exciting one $E_g$ component in the ferro-octupolar phase should transfer energy into the other component on the timescale $2\pi/\Delta\Omega$, a beat signature that disappears above $T_{\mathrm{FO}}$.
In the antiferro-quadrupolar phase the prediction is a redshifted second mode of order 0.2 meV, which realistic damping masks; observation of such a weak shift would not be evidence for octupolar order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the 1 meV splitting is confirmed, the same symmetry argument should transfer to any material with a $\Gamma_3$ non-Kramers doublet and Raman-active $E_g$ phonons, making phonon spectroscopy a generic screen for hidden octupolar order beyond the two named families.
The undamped spectral functions show a 'pseudogap' of split peaks persisting above $T_{\mathrm{FO}}$ to about $1.2T_{\mathrm{FO}}$, suggesting that short-range octupolar correlations or domain walls may leave phonon signatures even without long-range order; this regime deserves a targeted search with low-damping samples or pump-probe setups.
Because the splitting mechanism requires only time-reversal symmetry breaking in a pseudospin background and not circular ionic motion, it may apply to other rotationless phonons in time-reversal-broken phases, such as altermagnets or the pseudogap regime of cuprates, as the paper itself hints; that extension is speculative until a concrete model is built.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bottom line: this is a worthwhile theory paper that makes a genuinely new prediction — that ferro-octupolar (FO) order should split the Eg phonon doublet in non-Kramers doublet systems into pseudo-chiral modes with a measurable splitting, while antiferro-quadrupolar (AFQ) order should not. The contrast is derived cleanly from symmetry and the structure of the phonon self-energy, and it is not something you’ll find in the earlier chiral-phonon literature. If the splitting is real, it gives Raman spectroscopy a way to attack a long-standing hidden-order problem in Ba2CaOsO6 and PrV2Al20.

What they do well: the cumulant expansion to second order in spin-phonon coupling is worked out carefully, and the static-background averaging over Monte Carlo spin configurations is a sensible way to get temperature dependence. They also correctly point out that these modes are 'pseudo-chiral' — they carry quantized pseudo-angular momentum but no circular motion, which distinguishes them from the dipolar chiral phonon work. The FO versus AFQ contrast is a genuinely useful fingerprint: in the FO state the splitting scales as 4λ²/Ω0, while in the AFQ state it is further suppressed by an extra factor of hr/Ω0, so the qualitative distinction should survive even if the overall scale is off.

Soft spots: the quantitative detectability is hostage to λ. The paper takes λ ≈ 5 meV from the authors' own earlier DFT-based strain calculations; the splitting scales as λ², and with the assumed linewidth 2πη/Ω0 ≈ 0.07, a λ of 3 meV drops the splitting to roughly 0.45 meV, which is hidden under the ~0.9 meV linewidth. That is not a fatal flaw — the FO/AFQ contrast remains — but the headline 'detectable splitting' is conditional on λ being at the upper end of plausible values. A referee should ask for either an independent estimate of λ or an explicit sensitivity analysis. The spin-wave treatment at S=1/2 is also uncontrolled, though it is a standard approximation and probably not the dominant uncertainty. And, as the authors acknowledge, the candidate materials have not yet been shown to actually realize FO order; that is a scope condition rather than an internal error.

Who it's for: anyone working on multipolar order, chiral phonons, or Raman probes of hidden order. The proposed probe is concrete and falsifiable — a Raman experiment on Ba2CaOsO6 could confirm or kill the idea. It deserves a serious referee. My recommendation: send it to review. The quantitative worry is real but addressable; the core mechanism is solid and the prediction is new.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the effect of multipolar order on the Raman-active E_g phonon doublet of non-Kramers Γ₃ doublet systems, motivated by the osmate double perovskites Ba₂CaOsO₆ and Ba₂MgOsO₆ and by PrV₂Al₂₀. The authors introduce a symmetry-allowed linear coupling λ between the local quadrupolar pseudospin components (τ_x, τ_z) and the E_g phonon coordinates (Q_x, Q_z), treat the pseudospins as a static background for the fast Einstein phonons, integrate out transverse spin fluctuations in a second-order cumulant expansion, and average the local phonon spectral function over Monte Carlo Weiss-field configurations. The central claim is that both ferro-octupolar (FO) and antiferro-quadrupolar (AFQ) order lift the phonon degeneracy, but only the FO phase produces pseudo-chiral eigenmodes Q_± = Q_x ± iQ_z with a sizable splitting ΔΩ ≈ 4λ²/Ω₀ ≈ 1 meV, while the AFQ splitting (≈0.2 meV) is masked by realistic phonon damping. The paper proposes the splitting, its anomalous temperature dependence, and pump-probe beat dynamics as diagnostics of hidden octupolar order. The derivation in Eqs. (9)–(18) is internally consistent, and the FO/AFQ contrast follows from the structure of the phonon self-energy rather than from any fitting to the target observable.

Significance. If the quantitative prediction holds, this is a genuinely new and experimentally actionable probe of hidden T-odd multipolar order: it requires no applied field, no net magnetization, and no circular atomic motion, and it introduces pseudo-chiral (rotationless but pseudo-angular-momentum-carrying) phonon eigenmodes as a diagnostic concept. Credit is due for several concrete strengths: the phonon self-energy is derived in closed form rather than parametrized (Eqs. 16–18), the FO versus AFQ contrast is a structural consequence of the antisymmetric γ_r term, Fig. 4 makes the falsifiable statement that the splitting tracks the octupolar order parameter only qualitatively, and the pump-probe extension gives an independent experimental handle. The main fragility, identified below, is that the headline 'detectable' splitting inherits its entire magnitude from the magnetoelastic coupling λ, which is taken from same-group DFT work without an uncertainty estimate; the qualitative diagnostic contrast is more robust than the quantitative detectability claim.

major comments (2)

[Main text, after Eq. (3) and in the discussion of Fig. 2(a,b)] The central quantitative claim — that FO order produces a detectable pseudo-chiral splitting ΔΩ ≈ 4λ²/Ω₀ ≈ 1 meV — is controlled by a single input, λ ≈ 5 meV, which is inferred from the 'DFT splitting of the non-Kramers doublet under a strain field' in Refs. [44, 79]. Both references involve the present group, and no uncertainty, spread, or independent benchmark for λ is given. Because the splitting scales as λ², and because the realistic damping adopted in Figs. 2(b,d) and 3(b) (2πη/Ω₀ ≈ 0.07, i.e., η ≈ 0.9 meV at Ω₀ = 80 meV) is already comparable to the quoted splitting, a reduction of λ from 5 to 3 meV would lower ΔΩ to about 0.4 meV, putting the two peaks below the linewidth and invalidating the Raman-detectability proposal while leaving the qualitative FO-versus-AFQ contrast intact. I request: (i) a statement of the estimated accuracy of λ from the strain-DFT calculation, ideally with an independent corroboration; (ii) a plot of the FO peak separation versus λ with the damping-limited resolution threshold marked; and (iii) a reformulated detectability claim that explicitly states the λ range over which it holds.
[Main text Eqs. (5)–(7) and SM §II] The spin sector is treated in a Holstein-Primakoff expansion truncated at quadratic order, and the effective phonon action keeps only the second-order cumulant built from noninteracting spin-wave Green functions (SM Eqs. (11)–(22)). For a pseudospin-1/2 Γ₃ doublet, the dropped 1/S and anharmonic terms are a priori of order one, and the Weiss fields h_r entering Eqs. (16)–(18) are extracted from classical Monte Carlo configurations of the same S = 1/2 Hamiltonian, so the quantitative value of ΔΩ and the quoted phase boundaries (T_FO ≈ 3.2 J₀) carry an unquantified semiclassical error. The effect itself is plausibly robust, because the FO splitting originates in the antisymmetric, commutator-type part of the transverse spin correlation, which survives at zero temperature and does not depend on spin-wave occupation; nevertheless, the manuscript should estimate the leading 1/S or anharmonic correction to the prefactor of ΔΩ, or otherwise justify confidence in the numerical factor in Eqs. (16)–(18) at the level implied by the ≈1 meV claim.

minor comments (5)

[Throughout, including SM §II and §III] Please fix typographical errors: 'T j T_FO' should be 'T ≪ T_FO' (two occurrences), '∼ 105' should be '∼10⁵', 'Matusbara' should be 'Matsubara', 'pesudogap' should be 'pseudogap', and '1MeV' should be '1 meV'.
[SM §I, around Eq. (4)] The definitions of the four three-fold axes contain a duplication: n̂₂ and n̂₃ are both given as (x̂+ŷ−ẑ)/√3. The third axis should presumably be (x̂−ŷ+ẑ)/√3, and the C₃ eigenvalue assignments for n̂₂–n̂₄ in Eq. (6) should be rechecked once the axis is corrected.
[Main text, discussion of Fig. 2] Please clarify the relation between the quoted ΔΩ ≈ 4λ²/Ω₀ ≈ 1 meV and the actual peak separation obtained from Eqs. (16)–(18). Solving the 2×2 pole condition for a uniform FO configuration with Ω₀ = 80 meV, λ = 5 meV, and h_r ≈ 12 meV gives an off-diagonal self-energy magnitude ≈1.4 meV at the phonon frequency and a peak-to-peak separation closer to 2.7 meV, roughly twice the quoted value; either ΔΩ denotes the half-splitting, or the exact expression used for Fig. 4 should be stated explicitly.
[Main text, 'Phonon spectral function' paragraph] The damping convention is under-specified: the text states that damping is implemented by Ω₀ → Ω₀ + iη with 2πη/Ω₀ ≈ 0.07, but the resulting peak FWHM is never given. With that convention the FWHM is approximately 1.8 meV at Ω₀ = 80 meV, which makes the quoted 1 meV splitting only marginally resolvable; stating the FWHM in meV alongside the peak separation would materially help the reader assess the detectability claim.
[SM §III and Fig. S2] The criterion defining the pseudogap regime ('spectral weight 10% more than at ω = 0' in the main text; 'differ in spectral weight by more than 10% from the spectral weight at Ω₀' in the SM) is stated differently in the two places, and the precise way in which the weight difference is computed is not defined; please make the definition unambiguous and consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the phonon splitting is a derived output of the model, not a fitted input or a renamed prior result.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that ferro-octupolar order produces a pseudo-chiral splitting of the Eg phonon doublet—is an output of a well-defined calculation. Starting from the pseudospin-phonon Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1-3), the authors perform a second-order cumulant expansion of the phonon action (Eqs. 9-18) and obtain an explicit inverse phonon Green function whose off-diagonal γr term yields ΔΩ ≈ 4λ²/Ω0 (Eq. 17 and text after Fig. 2). Nothing in this derivation presupposes the magnitude or even the existence of the splitting; it follows from the model. The coupling constant λ ≈ 5 meV is taken from prior DFT calculations of the strain splitting of the non-Kramers doublet (Refs. [44,79]), which are independent of the phonon spectral function being predicted and are not fitted to Raman data. The Monte Carlo averaging uses spin configurations generated from the same pseudospin Hamiltonian, but the phonon spectral function is computed from those configurations, not used to define the Hamiltonian. The pseudo-angular-momentum characterization of the Q± modes is a group-theoretic classification derived in the Supplementary Material from the three-fold rotational symmetry, not an assumed conclusion. Several cited works (Refs. [13,44,75,79]) share authors with this paper, but they supply model ingredients or interpretive tools, not the target result itself. The quantitative 'detectable' claim is sensitive to the value of λ, since ΔΩ scales as λ²; however, parameter sensitivity is a robustness or correctness concern, not circularity. The derivation is self-contained and the claimed effect is not equivalent to any input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No experimental data are fitted in this paper. The free parameters are material inputs from prior literature (some co-authored), and the central prediction depends most sensitively on λ and the assumption that FO order is realized. The analysis is a self-consistent model calculation rather than a derivation of a previously unknown constant, so the ledger is dominated by model assumptions rather than invented entities.

free parameters (5)

λ (quadrupole-phonon coupling) = ≈ 5 meV
Sets the splitting scale ΔΩ ≈ 4λ²/Ω0. Inferred from DFT strain splitting reported in refs. [44,79], one of which is the authors' own prior paper; not re-derived here.
Ω0 (Eg phonon frequency) = ≈ 80 meV
Material input for Ba2CaOsO6; enters the denominator of the splitting formula and justifies the adiabatic separation Ω0 >> J0.
J0 (pseudospin exchange) = ≈ 1 meV
Exchange scale of Hsp taken from Ref. [78]; sets TFO ≈ 3.2J0 and the Weiss field scale hr ≈ 12J0.
J1/J0 and γ (exchange anisotropy) = J1/J0 ≈ 0.5, γ ≈ -0.4 for FO; J1/J0 = 2.3 for AFQ test
Chosen from Ref. [78] to stabilize FO order; the AFQ comparison uses a hand-set larger J1/J0 to switch the ground state.
η (phonon damping) = 2πη/Ω0 ≈ 0.07
Realistic linewidth from Refs. [36,82]; controls whether the small AFQ splitting is resolvable.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Local Γ3 non-Kramers doublet with pseudospin (τx,τz quadrupoles, τy octupole) describes the magnetic ion.
Crystal-field model for PrV2Al20 and Ba2CaOsO6 referenced to Refs. [64,75,78]; the whole calculation is built on this level scheme.
domain assumption Time-reversal-odd octupole has no linear on-site coupling to Eg phonons; only quadrupoles couple, via Hsp-ph = -λΣ(b+b†)τ.
Symmetry argument stated around Eq. (3); the T-odd octupole is assumed to enter only through the magnetic ground state and quadrupole fluctuations.
domain assumption Phonons are dispersionless Einstein modes with Ω0 >> J0, so fast phonons sense a static local Weiss field.
Used in 'Static pseudospin background'; central adiabatic approximation, justified by the quoted 80 meV versus ~1 meV energy scales.
standard math Pseudospins are treated as Holstein-Primakoff bosons around the local Weiss-field direction, truncated at harmonic order.
Eqs. (5)-(7); standard spin-wave expansion but uncontrolled for S=1/2 and for disordered high-temperature configurations.
domain assumption Second-order cumulant expansion in λ gives the phonon self-energy; higher orders are dropped.
SM Section II; standard weak-coupling approximation. Phonon damping is added by hand as Ω0→Ω0+iη.
domain assumption Classical Monte Carlo sampling of the pseudospin background yields the distribution P({h_r}).
Used for all spectral averages; the pseudospins are treated as classical variables despite the underlying quantum doublet.

invented entities (1)

Pseudo-chiral phonon eigenmodes Q± = Qx ± iQz with quantized pseudo-angular momentum (PAM) independent evidence
purpose: Explain the two split Eg phonon peaks in the ferro-octupolar phase and provide a symmetry label for Raman selection rules.
Not a new degree of freedom, but a newly identified physical object for multipolar magnets: the modes carry no circular atomic motion, yet split by a predicted ~1 meV observable in Raman spectroscopy. The predicted splitting is the falsifiable handle.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pseudo-chiral phonon splitting from octupolar magnetic order." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/43AQNGJA

@misc{pith2026250618978,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pseudo-chiral phonon splitting from octupolar magnetic order},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/43AQNGJA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.18978}
}

abstract

Motivated by the recent discovery of anomalously large magnetic response of chiral phonons in dipolar magnets, we explore an extension to study Einstein quantum phonon modes coupled to multipolar moments. We consider the case of non-Kramers $\Gamma_3$ doublets which encapsulate quadrupolar and Ising octupolar degrees of freedom, and which feature a symmetry-allowed linear coupling between local quadrupolar moments and Raman active $E_g$ phonon modes $(d_{x^2-y^2},d_{3z^2-r^2})$. We show that either octupolar or quadrupolar ordering leads to degeneracy breaking of the $E_g$ phonon doublet, with ferro-octupolar order favoring pseudo-chiral phonon eigenmodes with a detectable energy splitting. We describe this physics using a path integral approach in the limit where `fast' phonon modes sense the `slow' pseudospins as a static background which we average over using Monte Carlo simulations. We discuss implications for materials such as Ba$_2$CaOsO$_6$ and PrV$_2$Al$_{20}$ where Raman spectroscopy of phonons could be used as a potential probe of hidden octupolar order. Our work extends the important concept of chiral phonons to a large class of multipolar magnets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.18978 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** (b) shows the temperature dependent A(ω) incorporating realistic phonon damping 2πη/Ω0 ∼ 0.07 [36, 82]. Notably, we see that split peaks in the FO phase remain resolvable despite the broadening, which could serve as a signature of FO order. However, the large phonon linewidth masks the ‘pseudogap’ regime, so A(ω) exhibits a single peak at ω = Ω0 for T > TFO. We contrast these spectra in the FO phase with the corre… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Phonon spectral function relevant to pump-probe ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temperature dependence of the pseudo-chiral phonon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Phononic enhancement and detection of hidden spin-nematicity and dynamics in quantum magnets
cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Bond phonons in a spin-1 triangular-lattice magnet enlarge the spin-nematic and supersolid-nematic phases and imprint magnetic-field-tunable avoided crossings onto the phonon spectrum, giving a possible Raman / inelas...
Chern-Simons type cross-correlations and geometric Born effective charge of phonons
cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Gapped Dirac electrons generate a valley-Chern-number-dependent photon-phonon coupling and a frequency-induced chiral phonon splitting that survives at zero total Chern number.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

H. Chen, W. Zhang, Q. Niu, and L. Zhang, Chiral phonons in two-dimensional materials, 2D Mater. 6, 012002 (2019). 6

2019
[2]

T. Wang, H. Sun, X. Li, and L. Zhang, Chiral phonons: Prediction, veriﬁcation, and application, Nano Letters 24, 4311 (2024)

2024
[3]

Zhang, Z

S. Zhang, Z. Huang, M. Du, T. Ying, L. Du, and T. Zhang, The chirality of phonons: Deﬁnitions, symmetry constraints, and experimental observation, arXiv:2503.22794 (2025)

arXiv 2025
[4]

Zhang, Y

T. Zhang, Y. Liu, H. Miao, and S. Murakami, New ad- vances in phonons: From band topology to quasiparticle chirality, arXiv:2505.06179 (2025)

arXiv 2025
[5]

Y. Yang, Z. Xiao, Y. Mao, Z. Li, Z. Wang, T. Deng, Y. Tang, Z.-D. Song, Y. Li, H. Yuan, et al. , Catalogue of chiral phonon materials, arXiv:2506.13721 (2025)

arXiv 2025
[7]

H. Zhu, J. Yi, M.-Y. Li, J. Xiao, L. Zhang, C.-W. Yang, R. A. Kaindl, L.-J. Li, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Obser- vation of chiral phonons, Science 582, 579 (2018)

2018
[8]

H. Ueda, M. Garc ´ia-Fern´ andez, S. Agrestini, C. P. Ro- mao, J. van den Brink, N. A. Spaldin, K.-J. Zhou, and U. Staub, Chiral phonons in quartz probed by X-rays, Nature 618, 946 (2023)

2023
[9]

Ishito, H

K. Ishito, H. Mao, Y. Kousaka, Y. Togawa, S. Iwasaki, T. Zhang, S. Murakami, J.-i. Kishine, and T. Satoh, Truly chiral phonons in α -HgS, Nature Physics 19, 35 (2023)

2023

Show all 98 references

[10]

H. Ueda, A. Nag, C. P. Romao, M. Garc ´ia-Fern´ andez, K.- J. Zhou, and U. Staub, Chiral phonons in polar LiNbO 3, arXiv:2504.03330 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[11]

K. Ohe, H. Shishido, M. Kato, S. Utsumi, H. Matsuura, and Y. Togawa, Chirality-induced selectivity of phonon angular momenta in chiral quartz crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056302 (2024)

2024
[12]

Minakova, C

O. Minakova, C. Paiva, M. Frenzel, M. S. Spencer, J. M. Urban, C. Ringkamp, M. Wolf, G. Mussler, D. M. Juraschek, and S. F. Maehrlein, Direct observation of an- gular momentum transfer among crystal lattice modes, arXiv:2503.11626 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[14]

Y. Ren, C. Xiao, D. Saparov, and Q. Niu, Phonon Mag- netic Moment from Electronic Topological Magnetiza- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 186403 (2021)

2021
[15]

F. G. Hernandez, A. Baydin, S. Chaudhary, F. Tay, I. Katayama, J. Takeda, H. Nojiri, A. K. Okazaki, P. H. Rappl, E. Abramof, et al. , Observation of interplay be- tween phonon chirality and electronic band topology, Sci- ence advances 9, eadj4074 (2023)

2023
[16]

Zhang, Y

X.-W. Zhang, Y. Ren, C. Wang, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Gate-tunable phonon magnetic moment in bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 226302 (2023)

2023
[17]

Cheng, T

B. Cheng, T. Schumann, Y. Wang, X. Zhang, D. Bar- balas, S. Stemmer, and N. P. Armitage, A large eﬀective phonon magnetic moment in a dirac semimetal, Nano Letters 20, 5991 (2020)

2020
[18]

Chen, X.-W

W. Chen, X.-W. Zhang, Y. Su, T. Cao, D. Xiao, and S.- Z. Lin, Gauge theory of giant phonon magnetic moment in doped dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 111, 035126 (2025)

2025
[19]

Baydin, F

A. Baydin, F. G. G. Hernandez, M. Rodriguez-Vega, A. K. Okazaki, F. Tay, G. T. Noe, I. Katayama, J. Takeda, H. Nojiri, P. H. O. Rappl, E. Abramof, G. A. Fiete, and J. Kono, Magnetic Control of Soft Chiral Phonons in PbTe, Physical Review Letters 128, 075901 (2021)

2021
[20]

Chaudhary, D

S. Chaudhary, D. M. Juraschek, M. Rodriguez-Vega, and G. A. Fiete, Giant eﬀective magnetic moments of chiral phonons from orbit-lattice coupling, Phys. Rev. B 110, 094401 (2024)

2024
[21]

Lujan, J

D. Lujan, J. Choe, S. Chaudhary, G. Ye, C. Nnokwe, M. Rodriguez-Vega, J. He, F. Y. Gao, T. N. Nunley, E. Baldini, et al., Spin–orbit exciton–induced phonon chi- rality in a quantum magnet, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2304360121 (2024)

2024
[22]

Mustafa, C

H. Mustafa, C. Nnokwe, G. Ye, M. Fang, S. Chaudhary, J.-A. Yan, K. Wu, C. J. Cunningham, C. M. Hemesath, A. J. Stollenwerk, et al. , Origin of large eﬀective phonon magnetic moments in monolayer mos2, ACS nano 19, 11241 (2025)

2025
[24]

Chen, X.-W

W. Chen, X.-W. Zhang, T. Cao, S.-Z. Lin, and D. Xiao, Geometric origin of phonon magnetic moment in dirac materials, arXiv:2505.09732 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[25]

Bistoni, F

O. Bistoni, F. Mauri, and M. Calandra, Intrinsic Vibra- tional Angular Momentum from Nonadiabatic Eﬀects in Noncollinear Magnetic Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 225703 (2021)

2021
[26]

S. Ren, J. Bonini, M. Stengel, C. E. Dreyer, and D. Vanderbilt, Adiabatic dynamics of coupled spins and phonons in magnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011041 (2024)

2024
[27]

F. Wang, X. Liu, H. Sun, H. Wang, S. Murakami, L. Zhang, H. Zhang, and D. Xing, Ab initio theory of large phonon magnetic moments induced by electron- phonon coupling in magnetic materials, arXiv:2503.10160 (2025)

2025
[28]

M. Che, J. Liang, Y. Cui, H. Li, B. Lu, W. Sang, X. Li, X. Dong, L. Zhao, S. Zhang, T. Sun, W. Jiang, E. Liu, F. Jin, T. Zhang, and L. Yang, Magnetic order induced chiral phonons in a ferromagnetic weyl semimetal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 196906 (2025)

2025
[29]

Yang, Y.-Y

R. Yang, Y.-Y. Zhu, M. Steigleder, Y.-C. Liu, C.-C. Liu, X.-G. Qiu, T. Zhang, and M. Dressel, Inherent circu- lar dichroism of phonons in magnetic weyl semimetal Co3Sn2S2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 196905 (2025)

2025
[30]

Bonini, S

J. Bonini, S. Ren, D. Vanderbilt, M. Stengel, C. E. Dreyer, and S. Coh, Frequency splitting of chiral phonons from broken time-reversal symmetry in CrI 3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 086701 (2023)

2023
[31]

F. Wu, J. Zhou, S. Bao, L. Li, J. Wen, Y. Wan, and Q. Zhang, Magnetic switching of phonon angular mo- mentum in a ferrimagnetic insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 236701 (2025)

2025
[32]

F. Wu, S. Bao, J. Zhou, Y. Wang, J. Sun, J. Wen, Y. Wan, and Q. Zhang, Fluctuation-enhanced phonon magnetic moments in a polar antiferromagnet, Nature Physics 19, 1868 (2023)

2023
[33]

J. Cui, E. V. Bostr¨ om, M. Ozerov, F. Wu, Q. Jiang, J.-H. Chu, C. Li, F. Liu, X. Xu, A. Rubio, et al. , Chiral- ity selective magnon-phonon hybridization and magnon- induced chiral phonons in a layered zigzag antiferromag- net, Nature Communications 14, 3396 (2023)

2023
[34]

D. M. Juraschek, T. c. v. Neuman, and P. Narang, Gi- 7 ant eﬀective magnetic ﬁelds from optically driven chiral phonons in 4 f paramagnets, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013129 (2022)

2022
[35]

T. F. Nova, A. Cartella, A. Cantaluppi, M. F¨ orst, D. Bossini, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, A. V. Kimel, R. Merlin, and A. Cavalleri, An eﬀective magnetic ﬁeld from opti- cally driven phonons, Nature Physics 13, 132 (2017)

2017
[36]

J. Luo, T. Lin, J. Zhang, X. Chen, E. R. Blackert, R. Xu, B. I. Yakobson, and H. Zhu, Large eﬀective magnetic ﬁelds from chiral phonons in rare-earth halides, Science 382, 698 (2023)

2023
[37]

Basini, M

M. Basini, M. Pancaldi, B. Wehinger, M. Udina, V. Unikandanunni, T. Tadano, M. Hoﬀmann, A. Bal- atsky, and S. Bonetti, Terahertz electric-ﬁeld-driven dy- namical multiferroicity in SrT iO3, Nature 628, 534 (2024)

2024
[38]

C. S. Davies, F. G. N. Fennema, A. Tsukamoto, I. Raz- dolski, A. V. Kimel, and A. Kirilyuk, Phononic switching of magnetization by the ultrafast Barnett eﬀect, Nature 628, 540544 (2024)

2024
[39]

C. P. Romao and D. M. Juraschek, Light makes atoms behave like electromagnetic coils (2024)

2024
[41]

Shabala and R

N. Shabala and R. M. Geilhufe, Phonon inverse Faraday eﬀect from electron-phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 266702 (2024)

2024
[42]

D. M. Juraschek, M. Fechner, A. V. Balatsky, and N. A. Spaldin, Dynamical multiferroicity, Physical Review Ma- terials 1, 014401 (2017)

2017
[43]

R. M. Geilhufe, V. Juriˇ ci´ c, S. Bonetti, J.-X. Zhu, and A. V. Balatsky, Dynamically induced magnetism in KT aO3, Physical Review Research 3, L022011 (2021)

2021
[44]

K. Hart, R. Sutcliﬀe, G. Refael, and A. Paramekanti, Phonon-driven multipolar dynamics in a spin-orbit cou- pled mott insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 246701 (2025)

2025
[45]

Xiong, H

G. Xiong, H. Chen, D. Ma, and L. Zhang, Eﬀective mag- netic ﬁelds induced by chiral phonons, Phys. Rev. B 106, 144302 (2022)

2022
[46]

X. Li, J. Zhong, J. Cheng, H. Chen, H. Wang, J. Liu, D. Sun, L. Zhang, and J. Zhou, Chiral phonon activated spin Seebeck eﬀect in chiral materials, Sci. China Phys., Mech. Astron 67, 237511 (2024)

2024
[47]

B. Ma, Z. D. Wang, and G. v. Chen, Chiral phonons in- duced from spin dynamics via magnetoelastic anisotropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 246604 (2024)

2024
[48]

Yao and S

D. Yao and S. Murakami, Theory of spin magnetiza- tion driven by chiral phonons, Phys. Rev. B 111, 134414 (2025)

2025
[49]

Nishimura, T

N. Nishimura, T. Funato, M. Matsuo, and T. Kato, Theory of chiral-phonon-activated spin seebeck eﬀect, arXiv:2505.23083 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[50]

K. Kim, E. Vetter, L. Yan, C. Yang, Z. Wang, R. Sun, Y. Yang, A. H. Comstock, X. Li, J. Zhou, et al. , Chiral- phonon-activated spin Seebeck eﬀect, Nat. Mater. 22, 322 (2023)

2023
[51]

L. H. Hu, I. Yu, J.and Garate, and C. X. Liu, Phonon Helicity Induced by Electronic Berry Curvature in Dirac Materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 125901 (2021)

2021
[52]

Schaack, Observation of circularly polarized phonon states in an external magnetic ﬁeld, J

G. Schaack, Observation of circularly polarized phonon states in an external magnetic ﬁeld, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 9, 297 (1976)

1976
[53]

Schaack, Magnetic Field Dependent Splitting of Dou- bly Degenerate Phonon States in Anhydrous Cerium- Trichloride, Z

G. Schaack, Magnetic Field Dependent Splitting of Dou- bly Degenerate Phonon States in Anhydrous Cerium- Trichloride, Z. Physik B 26, 49 (1977)

1977
[54]

Santini, S

P. Santini, S. Carretta, N. Magnani, G. Amoretti, and R. Caciuﬀo, Hidden order and low-energy excitations in npo2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 207203 (2006)

2006
[55]

Santini, S

P. Santini, S. Carretta, G. Amoretti, R. Caciuﬀo, N. Magnani, and G. H. Lander, Multipolar interactions in f -electron systems: The paradigm of actinide dioxides, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 807 (2009)

2009
[56]

Chandra, P

P. Chandra, P. Coleman, J. Mydosh, and V. Tripathi, Hidden orbital order in the heavy fermion metal uru2si2, Nature 417, 831 (2002)

2002
[57]

Cricchio, F

F. Cricchio, F. Bultmark, O. Gr ˚ an¨ as, and L. Nordstr¨ om, Itinerant magnetic multipole moments of rank ﬁve as the hidden order in URu 2Si2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 107202 (2009)

2009
[58]

Haule and G

K. Haule and G. Kotliar, Arrested kondo eﬀect and hid- den order in uru 2si2, Nature Physics 5, 796 (2009)

2009
[59]

J. A. Mydosh and P. M. Oppeneer, Colloquium: Hidden order, superconductivity, and magnetism: The unsolved case of uru 2si2, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1301 (2011)

2011
[60]

Shiina, H

R. Shiina, H. Shiba, and P. Thalmeier, Magnetic-ﬁeld eﬀects on quadrupolar ordering in a γ 8-quartet system ceb 6, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 66, 1741 (1997), https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.66.1741

1997 doi
[61]

Ye, H.-H

M. Ye, H.-H. Kung, P. F. S. Rosa, E. D. Bauer, Z. Fisk, and G. Blumberg, Raman spectroscopy of f -electron metals: An example of ceb 6, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 065003 (2019)

2019
[62]

Otsuki, K

J. Otsuki, K. Yoshimi, H. Shinaoka, and H. O. Jeschke, Multipolar ordering from dynamical mean ﬁeld theory with application to ceb 6, Phys. Rev. B 110, 035104 (2024)

2024
[63]

Khmelevskyi and L

S. Khmelevskyi and L. V. Pourovskii, Non-collinear mag - netism driven by a hidden multipolar order in pro2, Com- munications Physics 7, 12 (2024)

2024
[64]

where the Pr 3+ 4f 2 conﬁguration leads to a J = 4 multiplet which is split by the Td crystal ﬁeld. Similar Γ 3 doublets on the face-centered cubic lattice arise in double perovskite Ba 2M OsO6 (M =Ca,Mg) from split- ting the J = 2 multiplet of 5 d2 Os6+ in an octahedral Oh cr...
[65]

Matsumoto, M

Y. Matsumoto, M. Tsujimoto, T. Tomita, A. Sakai, and S. Nakatsuji, Strong orbital ﬂuctuations in multipolar or- dered states of prv2al20, Journal of Magnetism and Mag- netic Materials 400, 66 (2016)

2016
[66]

Shimura, M

Y. Shimura, M. Tsujimoto, B. Zeng, L. Balicas, A. Sakai, and S. Nakatsuji, Field-induced quadrupolar quantum criticality in prv 2al20, Phys. Rev. B 91, 241102 (2015)

2015
[67]

S. Lee, S. Trebst, Y. B. Kim, and A. Paramekanti, Lan- dau theory of multipolar orders in pr (y) 2 x 20 kondo materials (y= ti, v, rh, ir; x= al, zn), Physical Review B 98, 134447 (2018)

2018
[68]

Ishitobi and K

T. Ishitobi and K. Hattori, Triple-q quadrupole-octupole order scenario for prv 2 al 20, Physical Review B 104, L241110 (2021)

2021
[69]

G. Chen, R. Pereira, and L. Balents, Exotic phases in- duced by strong spin-orbit coupling in ordered double perovskites, Phys. Rev. B 82, 174440 (2010)

2010
[70]

Hattori and H

K. Hattori and H. Tsunetsugu, Antiferro quadrupole orders in non-kramers doublet systems, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 83, 034709 (2014)

2014
[71]

Hirai, H

D. Hirai, H. Sagayama, S. Gao, H. Ohsumi, G. Chen, T.- h. Arima, and Z. Hiroi, Detection of multipolar orders in the spin-orbit-coupled 5 d Mott insulator Ba 2MgReO6, 8 Physical Review Research 2, 022063 (2020)

2020
[72]

L. Lu, M. Song, W. Liu, A. P. Reyes, P. Kuhns, H. O. Lee, I. R. Fisher, and V. F. Mitrovi´ c, Magnetism and local symmetry breaking in a mott insulator with strong spin orbit interactions, Nature Communications 8, 14407 (2017)

2017
[73]

Fiore Mosca, C

D. Fiore Mosca, C. Franchini, and L. V. Pourovskii, Inter- play of superexchange and vibronic eﬀects in the hidden order of Ba 2MgReO6 from ﬁrst principles, Phys. Rev. B 110, L201101 (2024)

2024
[74]

J.-R. Soh, M. E. Merkel, L. V. Pourovskii, I. ˇZivkovi´ c, O. Malanyuk, J. P´ asztorov´ a, S. Francoual, D. Hirai, A. Urru, D. Tolj, D. Fiore Mosca, O. V. Yazyev, N. A. Spaldin, C. Ederer, and H. M. Rønnow, Spectroscopic signatures and origin of hidden order in Ba 2MgReO6, Nat...

2024
[75]

Voleti, A

S. Voleti, A. Haldar, and A. Paramekanti, Octupolar or- der and ising quantum criticality tuned by strain and dimensionality: Application to d-orbital Mott insulators, Physical Review B 104, 174431 (2021)

2021
[76]

Chen and L

G. Chen and L. Balents, Spin-orbit coupling in d2 ordered double perovskites, Phys. Rev. B 84, 094420 (2011)

2011
[77]

Kuramoto, H

Y. Kuramoto, H. Kusunose, and A. Kiss, Multipole or- ders and ﬂuctuations in strongly correlated electron sys- tems, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 78, 072001 (2009)

2009
[78]

Churchill and H.-Y

D. Churchill and H.-Y. Kee, Competing multipolar orders in a face-centered cubic lattice: Application to the os- mium double perovskites, Physical Review B 105, 014438 (2022)

2022
[79]

Voleti, K

S. Voleti, K. Pradhan, S. Bhattacharjee, T. Saha- Dasgupta, and A. Paramekanti, Probing octupolar hid- den order via janus impurities, npj Quantum Materials 8, 42 (2023)

2023
[80]

L. V. Pourovskii, D. F. Mosca, and C. Franchini, Ferro- octupolar order and low-energy excitations in d2 dou- ble perovskites of osmium, Physical Review Letters 127, 237201 (2021)

2021
[81]

for details), the eﬀective phonon action is given by Sph eﬀ = ∑ r,n ( b∗ rx(n) b∗ rz(n)) · G −1(r, iν n) · ( brx(n) brz(n) ) (15) where n labels the Matsubara frequency iνn = 2 nπT , and G−1(r, iν n) is the 2 × 2 inverse local phonon Green function matrix which depends on the ...

2021
[82]

Paramekanti, D

A. Paramekanti, D. D. Maharaj, and B. D. Gaulin, Oc- tupolar order in d-orbital Mott insulators, Physical Re- view B 101, 054439 (2020)

2020
[83]

See Supplementary Material for details about: (i) Eg modes in Ba 2MgOsO6, (ii) the derivation of the eﬀective phonon action, and (iii) the high-temperature phonon spectral function and pseudogap
[84]

Maehrlein, A

S. Maehrlein, A. Paarmann, M. Wolf, and T. Kampfrath, Terahertz sum-frequency excitation of a raman-active phonon, Physical Review Letters 119, 127402 (2017)

2017
[85]

A. S. Patri, A. Sakai, S. Lee, A. Paramekanti, S. Nakat- suji, and Y. B. Kim, Unveiling hidden multipolar orders with magnetostriction, Nature Communications 10, 4092 (2019)

2019
[86]

A. S. Patri, M. Hosoi, S. Lee, and Y. B. Kim, Theory of magnetostriction for multipolar quantum spin ice in py- rochlore materials, Physical Review Research 2, 033015 (2020)

2020
[87]

S. W. Lovesey and D. D. Khalyavin, Lone octupole and bulk magnetism in osmate 5 d2 double perovskites, Phys. Rev. B 102, 064407 (2020)

2020
[88]

Tokunaga, D

Y. Tokunaga, D. Aoki, Y. Homma, S. Kambe, H. Sakai, S. Ikeda, T. Fujimoto, R. Walstedt, H. Yasuoka, E. Ya- mamoto, et al. , Nmr evidence for higher-order multipole order parameters in NpO 2, Physical Review Letters 97, 257601 (2006)

2006
[89]

W. Liu, R. Cong, E. Garcia, A. Reyes, H. Lee, I. Fisher, and V. Mitrovi, Phase diagram of ba2naoso6, a mott in- sulator with strong spin orbit interactions, Physica B: Condensed Matter 536, 863 (2018)

2018
[90]

R. Cong, E. Garcia, P. C. Forino, A. Tassetti, G. Allodi, A. P. Reyes, P. M. Tran, P. M. Woodward, C. Fran- chini, S. Sanna, and V. F. Mitrovi´ c, Eﬀects of charge doping on mott insulator with strong spin-orbit coupling, ba2na1− xcaxoso6, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 084409 (2023)

2023
[91]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

2022
[92]

Jungwirth, R

T. Jungwirth, R. M. Fernandes, J. Sinova, and L. Sme- jkal, Altermagnets and beyond: Nodal magnetically- ordered phases (2024), arXiv:2409.10034 [cond-mat.mtrl- sci]

2024 arXiv
[93]

Jungwirth, R

T. Jungwirth, R. M. Fernandes, E. Fradkin, A. H. Mac- Donald, J. Sinova, and L. Smejkal, Altermagnetism: an unconventional spin-ordered phase of matter (2025), arXiv:2411.00717 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

2025 arXiv
[94]

Grissonnanche, S

G. Grissonnanche, S. Th´ eriault, A. Gourgout, M.-E. Boulanger, E. Lefrancois, A. Ataei, F. Lalibert´ e, M. Dion, J.-S. Zhou, S. Pyon, et al. , Chiral phonons in the pseudo- gap phase of cuprates, Nature Physics 16, 1108 (2020)

2020
[95]

Grissonnanche, A

G. Grissonnanche, A. Legros, S. Badoux, E. Lefran- cois, V. Zatko, M. Lizaire, F. Lalibert´ e, A. Gourgout, J. S. Zhou, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, S. Ono, N. Doiron-Leyraud, and L. Taillefer, Giant thermal Hall conductivity in the pseudogap phase of cuprate super- conduc...

2019
[96]

Chaudhary, C

S. Chaudhary, C. P. Romao, and D. M. Juraschek, Anomalous pho non magnetic moments, arXiv:2504.19121 (2025)

2025
[97]

Zhang and Q

L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Chiral phonons at high-symmetry points in monolayer hexagonal lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 115502 (2015)

2015
[98]

H. Zhu, J. Yi, M.-Y. Li, J. Xiao, L. Zhang, C.-W. Yang, R. A. Kaindl, L.-J. Li, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Observation of chiral phonons, Science 582, 579 (2018)

2018
[99]

X. Chen, X. Lu, S. Dubey, Q. Yao, S. Liu, X. Wang, Q. Xiong, L. Zhang, and A. Srivastava, Entanglement of single-photons and chiral phonons in atomically thin WSe 2, Nat. Phys. 15, 221 (2019)

2019
[100]

H. Ueda, M. Garc ´ia-Fern´ andez, S. Agrestini, C. P. Romao, J. van den Brink, N. A. Spaldin, K.-J. Zhou, and U. Staub, Chiral phonons in quartz probed by X-rays, Nature 618, 946 (2023)

2023
[101]

Ishito, H

K. Ishito, H. Mao, Y. Kousaka, Y. Togawa, S. Iwasaki, T. Zh ang, S. Murakami, J.-i. Kishine, and T. Satoh, Truly chiral phonons in α -HgS, Nature Physics 19, 35 (2023)

2023
[102]

K. Hart, R. Sutcliﬀe, G. Refael, and A. Paramekanti, Phonon- driven multipolar dynamics in a spin-orbit coupled mott insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 246701 (2025). 6 FIG. S2. (a) Phonon spectral function A(ω ) corresponding to the technique shown in Fig. 2 of the main text , ...

2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

H. Chen, W. Zhang, Q. Niu, and L. Zhang, Chiral phonons in two-dimensional materials, 2D Mater. 6, 012002 (2019). 6

2019

[2] [2]

T. Wang, H. Sun, X. Li, and L. Zhang, Chiral phonons: Prediction, veriﬁcation, and application, Nano Letters 24, 4311 (2024)

2024

[3] [3]

Zhang, Z

S. Zhang, Z. Huang, M. Du, T. Ying, L. Du, and T. Zhang, The chirality of phonons: Deﬁnitions, symmetry constraints, and experimental observation, arXiv:2503.22794 (2025)

arXiv 2025

[4] [4]

Zhang, Y

T. Zhang, Y. Liu, H. Miao, and S. Murakami, New ad- vances in phonons: From band topology to quasiparticle chirality, arXiv:2505.06179 (2025)

arXiv 2025

[5] [5]

Y. Yang, Z. Xiao, Y. Mao, Z. Li, Z. Wang, T. Deng, Y. Tang, Z.-D. Song, Y. Li, H. Yuan, et al. , Catalogue of chiral phonon materials, arXiv:2506.13721 (2025)

arXiv 2025

[6] [7]

H. Zhu, J. Yi, M.-Y. Li, J. Xiao, L. Zhang, C.-W. Yang, R. A. Kaindl, L.-J. Li, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Obser- vation of chiral phonons, Science 582, 579 (2018)

2018

[7] [8]

H. Ueda, M. Garc ´ia-Fern´ andez, S. Agrestini, C. P. Ro- mao, J. van den Brink, N. A. Spaldin, K.-J. Zhou, and U. Staub, Chiral phonons in quartz probed by X-rays, Nature 618, 946 (2023)

2023

[8] [9]

Ishito, H

K. Ishito, H. Mao, Y. Kousaka, Y. Togawa, S. Iwasaki, T. Zhang, S. Murakami, J.-i. Kishine, and T. Satoh, Truly chiral phonons in α -HgS, Nature Physics 19, 35 (2023)

2023