Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 110 references

Topological Transitions in Orbital-Symmetry-Controlled Chemical Reactions

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that symmetry-forbidden electrocyclizations are marked by Green's-function zeros crossing zero frequency, while allowed paths show no such crossing, and a winding-number invariant classifies the reaction.

desk verdict A genuinely new application of the many-body pole-zero winding invariant to organic reactions, with a clean demonstration on butadiene electrocyclization, but the geometry-dependent chemical potential gauge is untested and could shift the claimed zero crossings. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.18984 v2 pith:YI24XQ3A submitted 2025-06-23 cond-mat.str-el physics.chem-ph

Ziren Xie , Amir Mirzanejad , Lukas Muechler This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elphysics.chem-ph
keywords Green'sfunctionzerostopologicalinvariantorbital-symmetryselectionruleselectrocyclizationstrongelectroniccorrelationsreactioncoordinateCASSCF
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Orbital-symmetry selection rules classify a reaction as allowed or forbidden by whether occupied and unoccupied molecular orbitals cross along the reaction path, but those orbitals are ill-defined precisely when the reaction is forbidden and correlations are strong. This paper claims that the distinction survives in the many-body Green's function: for the $4\pi$ electrocyclization of butadiene to cyclobutene, a symmetry-forbidden disrotatory pathway shows zeros crossing $\omega=0$ before the transition state, with symmetry-resolved invariants changing by $\Delta N_+=+1$ and $\Delta N_-=-1$, while the symmetry-allowed conrotatory pathway shows no pole or zero crossing and $\Delta N_+=0$. The classifying object is $N(R)=\oint \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\,\partial_\omega \ln \det G(\omega|R)$, a winding number computed separately in each symmetry sector. The result matters because single-reference and molecular-orbital pictures fail at the near-degeneracies that define forbidden reactions; Green's-function zeros restore a well-defined topological signal.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the many-body Green's function $G(\omega|R)$ for a fixed molecular geometry $R$, defined through the spectral representation over states with $N$, $N+1$, and $N-1$ electrons. Its determinant defines the invariant $N(R)=\oint_C \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\,\partial_\omega \ln \det G(\omega|R)$, a winding number whose value changes by $\pm1$ whenever a pole or zero of the Green's function crosses $\omega=0$; zeros appear where the self-energy diverges and encode static correlation. Spatial symmetry block-diagonalizes $G$ into $G_+\oplus G_-$, giving invariants $N_+(R)$ and $N_-(R)$ that can only change at a pole or zero crossing at $\omega=0$. The crossing of zeros at $\omega=0$ is therefore the interacting counterpart of the HOMO-LUMO level crossing of molecular-orbital theory.

What would settle it

Recompute the symmetry-resolved Green's functions for the disrotatory pathway with the chemical potential shifted by a small constant and with a larger active space and basis set, and follow the zeros near $\omega=0$; if the crossing geometry shifts or the invariant changes $\Delta N_+=+1$ and $\Delta N_-=-1$ are not reproduced, the zero-crossing diagnostic is an artifact of the chosen reference and level of theory rather than a stable topological classification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the orbital crossing predicted by one-electron theory for a symmetry-forbidden reaction is replaced, in a correlated Green's function, by a crossing of Green's function zeros at $\omega=0$, while the allowed path has neither poles nor zeros crossing $\omega=0$. The zeros appear where the natural-orbital occupation numbers of the HOMO and LUMO become degenerate, and they are protected by the same spatial symmetry that protected the molecular-orbital crossing. Symmetry block-diagonalizes the Green's function as $G_+\oplus G_-$; the winding invariants $N_+(R)$ and $N_-(R)$ change by $\Delta N_+=+1$ and $\Delta N_-=-1$ across the forbidden reaction and by $\Delta N_+=0$ across the allowed one, so comparing reactants and products is sufficient to classify the reaction. A substituted planar $4\pi$ photoswitch with no spatial symmetry still shows the zero crossing, indicating that static correlation can dominate over symmetry-breaking in such systems.

Load-bearing premise

The classification fixes the zero of frequency by a geometry-dependent chemical potential $\mu(R)=-(IP+EA)/2$ (the negative average of the ionization potential and electron affinity); if a different chemical potential or reservoir were used, the number and location of $\omega=0$ zero crossings could change, and the paper does not test this gauge dependence or convergence with active-space size or basis set.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Reactant and product geometries alone suffice: computing $N_+(R)$ and $N_-(R)$ at the two endpoints yields $\Delta N_+=+1$ and $\Delta N_-=-1$ for the forbidden path and $\Delta N_+=0$ for the allowed path, so a full scan of the reaction coordinate is unnecessary for classification.
  • A nonzero value of $\Delta N_+ - \Delta N_-$ forces at least one pole or zero to cross $\omega=0$ between the two geometries, so a symmetry-forbidden reaction necessarily passes through a geometry where one symmetry sector loses its gapped single-particle description.
  • The framework replaces molecular-orbital correlation diagrams with Green's-function zeros, so it applies to strongly correlated reactions where single-reference methods and well-defined molecular orbitals do not exist.
  • The same invariant construction can be transferred to spin-resolved or excited-state reactions by treating spin or state sectors as the symmetry blocks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the paper does not make is to search for a chemical-potential-independent invariant, because the zero crossings are defined relative to $\mu(R)=-(IP+EA)/2$; the current data do not test whether a shifted reference would preserve the classification.
  • If the zero-crossing geometry coincides with degeneracy of the HOMO and LUMO natural-orbital occupation numbers, those occupation numbers alone could serve as a cheaper diagnostic for forbiddenness in larger systems; the paper reports the coincidence but does not propose it as a criterion.
  • The survival of the zero crossing in the substituted photoswitch suggests the classification may remain meaningful for asymmetric reactions when static correlation dominates the symmetry-breaking scale, a scale competition the paper does not quantify.
  • A nonzero invariant difference between reactant and product implies the two endpoints are not adiabatically connected in the correlated sense, which hints at a link between this classification and nonadiabatic reaction dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a Green's-function-based topological invariant for classifying orbital-symmetry-controlled chemical reactions. The central object is N(R) = ∮ dω/(2πi) ∂_ω ln Det G(ω|R), whose symmetry-resolved versions N_+(R) and N_-(R) count Green's-function poles and zeros above ω=0 in each symmetry sector. For the 4π electrocyclization of butadiene, the authors compute CASSCF(4,4)/def2-SVP Green's functions along conrotatory and disrotatory IRCs and find that the symmetry-forbidden disrotatory pathway exhibits a crossing of Green's-function zeros at ω=0 (with ΔN_+=+1 and ΔN_-=-1), whereas the symmetry-allowed conrotatory pathway shows no such crossing (ΔN=0). The paper also applies the formalism to an asymmetric photoswitch where spatial symmetry is broken, reporting a maintained zero crossing at CASSCF(8,8) level.

Significance. If the diagnostic is robust, this work provides a conceptually novel way to identify symmetry-forbidden reactions in strongly correlated regimes where molecular-orbital crossings are not well defined. The external benchmark against the Woodward-Hoffmann classification is appropriate, and the paper contains enough computational detail (Cartesian coordinates, active-space definitions, winding-number evaluation procedure) to be reproducible. The main value lies in connecting modern topological invariants for Green's functions to mainstream quantum chemistry; the presentation is clear and the illustrative examples are well chosen.

major comments (4)
  1. [SI Eq. (S4) and Sec. II.D] The entire classification is defined relative to a geometry-dependent chemical potential μ(R)=-(IP+EA)/2. The zero-crossing events and the values of N_+(R), N_-(R) and their differences are evaluated at ω=0 in this shifted frequency frame. The authors do not test whether a different equally valid reference, such as a fixed μ_0 or another point inside the HOMO-LUMO gap, changes the number or location of zero crossings and hence the claimed ΔN_+=+1, ΔN_-=-1 versus ΔN=0 distinction. This is load-bearing because the invariant's meaning changes when the frequency origin moves with geometry; a numerical scan over μ is needed to establish that the classification is not an artifact of the Mulliken convention.
  2. [Sec. II.B and Sec. II.C] The central calculations for the main reaction use a minimal CASSCF(4,4)/def2-SVP active space. Since the Green's-function zeros are presented as a consequence of static correlation, their position near ω=0 could shift with active-space size or basis set; no convergence test with a larger active space or basis is reported. The photoswitch calculation uses CASSCF(8,8) but there is no systematic comparison between the two levels, so the robustness of the zero-crossing diagnostic across levels of theory is unestablished.
  3. [Eq. (2) and SI Sec. I.A] The invariant involves a frequency cutoff C, but the paper does not report how N_+ and N_- depend on C. The text says the contour is the complex upper half plane, while the SI integrates along [−C,C] with a semicircular closure; the resulting winding number is a function of C unless convergence is demonstrated. Since the difference between allowed and forbidden pathways is the whole claim, the cutoff dependence should be checked and stated.
  4. [Eq. (2) and surrounding text] The sentence 'The topological invariant counts the number of zeros and poles on the real line contained within the plane' is imprecise: a winding number along a contour in the upper half-plane counts zeros minus poles enclosed by the contour, not simply those on the real line. This becomes relevant when the charge-conservation statement ΔN≡0 is invoked, because the relation between the invariant and the electron number requires a fixed frequency origin; the paper should clarify this point given the geometry-dependent μ(R).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption refers to 'multireference' Green's functions but the main text distinguishes 'no interactions' and 'multireference'; a phrase such as 'with interactions' would be clearer for readers not familiar with the terminology.
  2. [Sec. II.D, Eq. (3)] The notation 'ΔN_+− ΔN_- ≠ 0' would benefit from an explicit definition of what 'switching of poles (zeros) between two different molecular geometries' means quantitatively, e.g., a statement that the pole/zero that crosses ω=0 changes symmetry sector.
  3. [Sec. II.D] The sentence 'It is therefore sufficient to compute the change of one block' should specify whether this sufficiency relies on the exact relation ΔN_+ + ΔN_- = 0, which is only exact in the limit of a converged contour; this qualification would prevent misinterpretation.
  4. [Sec. I] The phrase 'poles are replaces by zeros' in the paragraph before Fig. 3 contains a typo; it should read 'poles are replaced by zeros'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Green's-function invariant is computed, not fitted, and the allowed/forbidden distinction is benchmarked against, not derived from, the Woodward-Hoffmann rules.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The topological invariant in Eq. (2) is the standard winding number of det G(ω|R), adopted from the cited literature (refs. 70 and 90), and it is evaluated on Green's functions obtained from explicit CASSCF calculations rather than from any parameter fitted to the reaction outcome. The claim that the forbidden disrotatory pathway shows a zero crossing at ω=0 while the allowed conrotatory pathway does not is a computed result of those Green's functions, not an input assumption. The Woodward-Hoffmann classification is used as an external benchmark for comparison, not as a fitted target. The geometry-dependent chemical potential μ(R)=-(IP+EA)/2 (SI Eq. S4) is a convention for choosing the frequency origin, but the zero-crossing events are not manufactured by this convention; they are features of the computed many-body Green's function. The paper does not test the sensitivity of the zero crossings to this gauge choice or to active-space size, but that is a robustness/correctness concern, not a circular reduction. The few self-citations (e.g., ref. 41 for symmetry protection and ref. 97 for the planar photoswitch) are not load-bearing: the symmetry argument is independently checkable group theory, and the photoswitch Green's-function calculation is a new computation rather than a restatement of the earlier proposal. No equation or fitted parameter is reused as a prediction, so the derivation chain is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard complex analysis plus a series of domain assumptions: a singlet ground state, a symmetry-preserving reaction path, the Mulliken chemical potential as frequency origin, and the adequacy of small active-space CASSCF Green's functions. No invented entities are introduced; the two free parameters are reference conventions, namely the chemical potential and the integration cutoff, not fitted constants.

free parameters (2)
  • Chemical potential reference μ(R)=-(IP+EA)/2 = not a fit; geometry-dependent and not tabulated
    Defines the frequency origin ω=0 for the Green's function, spectral plots, and invariant. The zero-crossing diagnostic and N± values are relative to this choice; a different reservoir or μ convention could move zero crossings. Introduced in SI Eq. S4.
  • Winding-number frequency cutoff C = not reported
    The invariant is evaluated by integrating Det G over [-C,C] with a semicircular contour in the complex plane (SI). The winding numbers N± depend on C if the cutoff excludes poles or zeros; the paper does not state C or show cutoff independence.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The ground state is a non-degenerate singlet with fixed electron number N, so G admits a Lehmann representation with poles at addition and removal energies.
    Equation (1) and Section II.A; the whole formalism assumes this starting point.
  • standard math The argument-principle winding number N(R)=∮ dω/(2πi) ∂ ln Det G/∂ω counts zeros minus poles in the chosen half-plane.
    Equation (2); this is a standard result from complex analysis given the stated contour.
  • ad hoc to paper The Mulliken chemical potential μ=-(IP+EA)/2 is the correct frequency origin for diagnosing HOMO/LUMO crossings.
    SI Eq. S4; the zero-crossing at ω=0 and the invariants N± are only meaningful relative to this choice, which is not tested for robustness.
  • domain assumption C2 (conrotatory) or σv mirror (disrotatory) symmetry is exactly preserved along the IRC, so G block-diagonalizes as G+⊕G-.
    SI Eq. S5 and Section II.D; if CAS orbitals break symmetry at near-degenerate geometries, the N± decomposition is not well-defined.
  • domain assumption The CASSCF active-space Hamiltonian plus TRIQS exact diagonalization yields a Green's function whose pole-zero structure near ω=0 is quantitatively reliable.
    Section IV and SI; no convergence checks against larger active spaces or higher-level methods are provided.
  • ad hoc to paper For the asymmetric photoswitch, the symmetry-breaking energy scale Δ is smaller than the static correlation scale U, so the zero crossing remains well defined without symmetry protection.
    Section III and Fig. 8; the paper argues this from observing the crossing, but does not independently estimate Δ or U.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological Transitions in Orbital-Symmetry-Controlled Chemical Reactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YI24XQ3A

@misc{pith2026250618984,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological Transitions in Orbital-Symmetry-Controlled Chemical Reactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YI24XQ3A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.18984}
}
abstract

Topological band theory has transformed our understanding of crystalline materials by classifying the connectivity and crossings of electronic energy levels. Extending these concepts to molecular systems has therefore attracted significant interest. Reactions governed by orbital symmetry conservation are ideal candidates, as they classify pathways as symmetry-allowed or symmetry-forbidden depending on whether molecular orbitals cross along the reaction coordinate. However, the presence of strong electronic correlations in these reactions invalidate the framework underlying topological band theory, preventing direct generalization. Here, we introduce a formalism in terms of Green's functions to classify orbital symmetry controlled reactions even in the presence of strong electronic correlations. Focusing on prototypical 4$\pi$ electrocyclizations, we show that symmetry-forbidden pathways are characterized by crossings of Green's function zeros, in stark contrast to the crossings of poles as predicted by molecular-orbital theory. We introduce a topological invariant that identifies these symmetry protected crossings of both poles and zeros along a reaction coordinate and outline generalizations of our approach to reactions without any conserved spatial symmetries along the reaction path. Our work lays the groundwork for systematic application of modern topological methods to chemical reactions and can be extended to reactions involving different spin states or excited states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.18984 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Summary of main results of this paper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Spectral functions and Green’s functions plotted as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Ground state and first excited state reaction coor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Sketch of the molecular orbital correlation diagram [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Green’s function plotted as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    \ Chiu , author J

    author author C.-K. \ Chiu , author J. C. Y. \ Teo , author A. P. \ Schnyder , \ and\ author S. Ryu ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.88.035005 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 88 ,\ pages 035005 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.035005 2016

  2. [2]

    Bradlyn , author L

    author author B. Bradlyn , author L. Elcoro , author J. Cano , author M. Vergniory , author Z. Wang , author C. Felser , author M. I. \ Aroyo , \ and\ author B. A. \ Bernevig ,\ 10.1038/nature23268 journal journal Nature \ volume 547 ,\ pages 298 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nature23268

  3. [3]

    Watanabe , author H

    author author H. Watanabe , author H. C. \ Po , \ and\ author A. Vishwanath ,\ 10.1126/sciadv.aat8685 journal journal Sci. Adv. \ volume 4 ( year 2018 ),\ 10.1126/sciadv.aat8685 NoStop

    doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat8685 2018

  4. [4]

    Po , author A

    author author H. Po , author A. Vishwanath , \ and\ author H. Watanabe ,\ 10.1038/s41467-017-00133-2 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 50 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00133-2 2017

  5. [5]

    Kruthoff , author J

    author author J. Kruthoff , author J. de Boer , author J. van Wezel , author C. L. \ Kane , \ and\ author R.-J. \ Slager ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.041069 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 7 ,\ pages 041069 NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.041069

  6. [6]

    author author M. G. \ Vergniory , author L. Elcoro , author C. Felser , author N. Regnault , author B. A. \ Bernevig , \ and\ author Z. Wang ,\ 10.1038/s41586-019-0954-4 journal journal Nature \ volume 566 ,\ pages 480 ( a ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0954-4

  7. [7]

    Zhang , author Y

    author author T. Zhang , author Y. Jiang , author Z. Song , author H. Huang , author Y. He , author Z. Fang , author H. Weng , \ and\ author C. Fang ,\ 10.1038/s41586-019-0944-6 journal journal Nature \ volume 566 ,\ pages 475 NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0944-6

  8. [8]

    author author M. G. \ Vergniory , author B. J. \ Wieder , author L. Elcoro , author S. S. P. \ Parkin , author C. Felser , author B. A. \ Bernevig , \ and\ author N. Regnault ,\ 10.1126/science.abg9094 journal journal Science \ ,\ pages eabg9094 ( b ) NoStop

    doi:10.1126/science.abg9094

Show all 110 references
  1. [9]

    author author M. V. \ Berry ,\ 10.1098/rspa.1984.0023 journal journal Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. \ volume 392 ,\ pages 45 NoStop

    1984

  2. [10]

    Bansil , author H

    author author A. Bansil , author H. Lin , \ and\ author T. Das ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.88.021004 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 88 ,\ pages 021004 NoStop

    doi

  3. [11]

    Manna , author Y

    author author K. Manna , author Y. Sun , author Muechler, L. , author J. Kübler , \ and\ author C. Felser ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Rev. Mater. \ volume 3 ,\ pages 244 NoStop

  4. [12]

    Xiao \ and\ author B

    author author J. Xiao \ and\ author B. Yan ,\ 10.1038/s42254-021-00292-8 journal journal Nature Reviews Physics \ volume 3 ,\ pages 283 NoStop

    doi

  5. [13]

    author author B. Q. \ Lv , author T. Qian , \ and\ author H. Ding ,\ 10.1103/revmodphys.93.025002 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 93 ,\ pages 025002 NoStop

    doi

  6. [14]

    Kumar , author S

    author author N. Kumar , author S. N. \ Guin , author K. Manna , author C. Shekhar , \ and\ author C. Felser ,\ 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00732 journal journal Chem. Rev. \ volume 121 ,\ pages 2780 NoStop

    doi

  7. [15]

    \ Chiu \ and\ author A

    author author C.-K. \ Chiu \ and\ author A. P. \ Schnyder ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.205136 journal journal Phys. Rev. B. \ volume 90 ,\ pages 205136 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  8. [16]

    Bradlyn , author J

    author author B. Bradlyn , author J. Cano , author Z. Wang , author M. G. \ Vergniory , author C. Felser , author R. J. \ Cava , \ and\ author B. A. \ Bernevig ,\ 10.1126/science.aaf5037 journal journal Science \ volume 353 ,\ pages aaf5037 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  9. [17]

    Song , author T

    author author Z. Song , author T. Zhang , author Z. Fang , \ and\ author C. Fang ,\ 10.1038/s41467-018-06010-w journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 9 ,\ pages 3530 NoStop

    doi

  10. [18]

    author author H. C. \ Po ,\ 10.1088/1361-648X/ab7adb journal journal J. Phys. Condens. Matter \ volume 32 ,\ pages 263001 NoStop

    doi

  11. [19]

    author author B. J. \ Wieder , author B. Bradlyn , author J. Cano , author Z. Wang , author M. G. \ Vergniory , author L. Elcoro , author A. A. \ Soluyanov , author C. Felser , author T. Neupert , author N. Regnault , \ and\ author B. A. \ Bernevig ,\ 10.1038/s41578-021-00380-...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Tang , author H

    author author F. Tang , author H. C. \ Po , author A. Vishwanath , \ and\ author X. Wan ,\ 10.1038/s41586-019-0937-5 journal journal Nature \ volume 566 ,\ pages 486 NoStop

    doi

  13. [21]

    Faure \ and\ author B

    author author F. Faure \ and\ author B. Zhilinskii ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.960 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 85 ,\ pages 960 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  14. [22]

    Zhilinskií ,\ 10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00089-2 journal journal Phys

    author author B. Zhilinskií ,\ 10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00089-2 journal journal Phys. Rep. \ volume 341 ,\ pages 85 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  15. [23]

    Faure \ and\ author B

    author author F. Faure \ and\ author B. Zhilinskii ,\ 10.1016/s0375-9601(02)01171-4 journal journal Phys. Lett. A \ volume 302 ,\ pages 242 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  16. [24]

    Muechler , author J

    author author L. Muechler , author J. Maciejko , author T. Neupert , \ and\ author R. Car ,\ 10.1103/physrevb.90.245142 journal journal Phys. Rev. B. \ volume 90 ,\ pages 245142 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  17. [25]

    Dhont , author T

    author author G. Dhont , author T. Iwai , \ and\ author B. Zhilinskií ,\ 10.3842/SIGMA.2017.054 journal journal SIGMA \ volume 13 ,\ pages 054 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    Wu , author G

    author author Y. Wu , author G. Miao , \ and\ author J. E. \ Subotnik ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c04562 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. A \ volume 124 ,\ pages 7355 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    Wu \ and\ author J

    author author Y. Wu \ and\ author J. E. \ Subotnik ,\ 10.1038/s41467-020-20831-8 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 12 ,\ pages 700 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    Bian , author T

    author author X. Bian , author T. Qiu , author J. Chen , \ and\ author J. E. \ Subotnik ,\ 10.1063/5.0093092 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 156 ,\ pages 234107 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    Culpitt , author L

    author author T. Culpitt , author L. D. M. \ Peters , author E. I. \ Tellgren , \ and\ author T. Helgaker ,\ 10.1063/5.0055388 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 155 ,\ pages 024104 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    Culpitt , author E

    author author T. Culpitt , author E. I. \ Tellgren , author L. D. M. \ Peters , \ and\ author T. Helgaker ,\ 10.1063/5.0229854 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 161 ,\ pages 184109 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    Morreale \ and\ author M

    author author D. Morreale \ and\ author M. Persico ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpca.3c07042 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. A \ volume 128 ,\ pages 1707 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    author author R. F. \ Ribeiro \ and\ author J. Yuen-Zhou ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02592 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. Lett. \ volume 9 ,\ pages 242 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  25. [33]

    author author I. G. \ Ryabinkin , author L. Joubert-Doriol , \ and\ author A. F. \ Izmaylov ,\ 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00220 journal journal Acc. Chem. Res. \ volume 50 ,\ pages 1785 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  26. [34]

    author author L. M. \ Ibele , author E. Sangiogo Gil , author B. F. E. \ Curchod , \ and\ author F. Agostini ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02672 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. Lett. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 11625 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    Requist , author F

    author author R. Requist , author F. Tandetzky , \ and\ author E. K. U. \ Gross ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.042108 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 93 ,\ pages 042108 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  28. [36]

    Requist , author C

    author author R. Requist , author C. R. \ Proetto , \ and\ author E. K. U. \ Gross ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.062503 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 96 ,\ pages 062503 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  29. [37]

    author author C. H. \ Valahu , author V. C. \ Olaya-Agudelo , author R. J. \ MacDonell , author T. Navickas , author A. D. \ Rao , author M. J. \ Millican , author J. B. \ Pérez-Sánchez , author J. Yuen-Zhou , author M. J. \ Biercuk , author C. Hempel , author T. R. \ Tan , \ ...

    doi

  30. [38]

    author author R. B. \ Woodward \ and\ author R. Hoffmann ,\ 10.1002/anie.196907811 journal journal Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 781 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

    1969 doi

  31. [39]

    author author G. C. G. \ Waschewsky , author P. W. \ Kash , author T. L. \ Myers , author D. C. \ Kitchen , \ and\ author L. J. \ Butler ,\ 10.1039/FT9949001581 journal journal J. Chem. Soc. , Faraday Trans. \ volume 90 ,\ pages 1581 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    doi

  32. [40]

    author author L. J. \ Butler ,\ 10.1146/annurev.physchem.49.1.125 journal journal Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. \ volume 49 ,\ pages 125 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  33. [41]

    Muechler ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.045123 journal journal Phys

    author author L. Muechler ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.045123 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 101 ,\ pages 045123 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    Zhou , author G

    author author Q. Zhou , author G. Kukier , author I. Gordiy , author R. Hoffmann , author J. I. \ Seeman , \ and\ author K. N. \ Houk ,\ 10.1021/acs.joc.3c02103 journal journal J. Org. Chem. \ volume 89 ,\ pages 1018 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  35. [43]

    author author M. T. \ Ong , author J. Leiding , author H. Tao , author A. M. \ Virshup , \ and\ author T. J. \ Martínez ,\ 10.1021/ja8095834 journal journal J. Am. Chem. Soc. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 6377 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  36. [44]

    author author G. S. \ Kochhar , author A. Bailey , \ and\ author N. J. \ Mosey ,\ 10.1002/anie.201003978 journal journal Angew. Chem. Int. Ed Engl. \ volume 49 ,\ pages 7452 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  37. [45]

    author author C. L. \ Brown , author B. H. \ Bowser , author J. Meisner , author T. B. \ Kouznetsova , author S. Seritan , author T. J. \ Martinez , \ and\ author S. L. \ Craig ,\ 10.1021/jacs.0c12088 journal journal J. Am. Chem. Soc. \ volume 143 ,\ pages 3846 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  38. [46]

    Boguslawski , author P

    author author K. Boguslawski , author P. Tecmer , author G. Barcza , author \"O . Legeza , \ and\ author M. Reiher ,\ 10.1021/ct400247p journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 9 ,\ pages 2959 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  39. [47]

    author author A. I. \ Krylov ,\ title The quantum chemistry of open-shell species , \ in\ https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119356059.ch4 booktitle Reviews in Computational Chemistry \ ( year 2017 )\ Chap. chapter 4 , pp.\ pages 151--224 NoStop

    2017 doi

  40. [48]

    author author J. W. \ Park , author R. Al-Saadon , author M. K. \ MacLeod , author T. Shiozaki , \ and\ author B. Vlaisavljevich ,\ 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00496 journal journal Chem. Rev. \ volume 120 ,\ pages 5878 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  41. [49]

    author author H. C. \ Longuet-Higgins \ and\ author E. W. \ Abrahamson ,\ 10.1021/ja01087a033 journal journal J. Am. Chem. Soc. \ volume 87 ,\ pages 2045 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

    1965 doi

  42. [50]

    author author W. A. \ Goddard , III ,\ @noop journal journal J. Am. Chem. Soc. \ volume 94 ,\ pages 793 ( year 1972 ) NoStop

    1972

  43. [51]

    Ross , author G

    author author J. Ross , author G. M. \ Whitesides , \ and\ author H. Metiu ,\ 10.1002/anie.197903771 journal journal Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. \ volume 18 ,\ pages 377 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    1979 doi

  44. [52]

    Cederbaum \ and\ author W

    author author L. Cederbaum \ and\ author W. Domcke ,\ @noop journal journal Adv. Chem. Phys. \ volume 36 ,\ pages 205 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    1977

  45. [53]

    Schirmer , author L

    author author J. Schirmer , author L. S. \ Cederbaum , \ and\ author O. Walter ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A. \ volume 28 ,\ pages 1237 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    1983

  46. [54]

    von Niessen , author J

    author author W. von Niessen , author J. Schirmer , \ and\ author L. S. \ Cederbaum ,\ @noop journal journal Comput. Phys. Rep. \ volume 1 ,\ pages 57 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984

  47. [55]

    author author A. A. \ Rusakov \ and\ author D. Zgid ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 144 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  48. [56]

    author author J. J. \ Phillips , author A. A. \ Kananenka , \ and\ author D. Zgid ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 142 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  49. [57]

    Jacquemin , author I

    author author D. Jacquemin , author I. Duchemin , \ and\ author X. Blase ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. Chem. Lett. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 1524 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  50. [58]

    author author M. J. \ Van Setten , author F. Caruso , author S. Sharifzadeh , author X. Ren , author M. Scheffler , author F. Liu , author J. Lischner , author L. Lin , author J. R. \ Deslippe , author S. G. \ Louie , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ v...

    2015

  51. [59]

    Golze , author M

    author author D. Golze , author M. Dvorak , \ and\ author P. Rinke ,\ @noop journal journal Front. Chem. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 377 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  52. [60]

    author author M. J. \ van Setten , author F. Weigend , \ and\ author F. Evers ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 9 ,\ pages 232 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  53. [61]

    Laughon , author J

    author author K. Laughon , author J. M. \ Yu , \ and\ author T. Zhu ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02534 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. Lett. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 9122 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  54. [62]

    author author J. J. \ Phillips \ and\ author D. Zgid ,\ 10.1063/1.4884951 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 140 ,\ pages 241101 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  55. [63]

    author author J. M. \ Luttinger ,\ 10.1103/physrev.119.1153 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 119 ,\ pages 1153 ( year 1960 ) NoStop

    1960 doi

  56. [64]

    Georges , author G

    author author A. Georges , author G. Kotliar , author W. Krauth , \ and\ author M. J. \ Rozenberg ,\ 10.1103/revmodphys.68.13 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 68 ,\ pages 13 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  57. [65]

    Onida , author L

    author author G. Onida , author L. Reining , \ and\ author A. Rubio ,\ 10.1103/revmodphys.74.601 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 74 ,\ pages 601 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  58. [66]

    Zgid \ and\ author G

    author author D. Zgid \ and\ author G. K. \ Chan ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 134 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  59. [67]

    Lin , author C

    author author N. Lin , author C. A. \ Marianetti , author A. J. \ Millis , \ and\ author D. R. \ Reichman ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 106 ,\ pages 096402 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  60. [68]

    Shee \ and\ author D

    author author A. Shee \ and\ author D. Zgid ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00603 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 6010 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  61. [69]

    author author G. D. \ Mahan ,\ 10.1007/978-1-4757-5714-9 title Many-particle physics ,\ Physics of Solids and Liquids\ ( publisher Springer ,\ address New York, NY ,\ year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  62. [70]

    Gurarie ,\ @noop journal journal Phys

    author author V. Gurarie ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter \ volume 83 ,\ pages 085426 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  63. [71]

    \ Slager , author L

    author author R.-J. \ Slager , author L. Rademaker , author J. Zaanen , \ and\ author L. Balents ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.085126 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 92 ,\ pages 085126 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  64. [72]

    Seki \ and\ author S

    author author K. Seki \ and\ author S. Yunoki ,\ 10.1103/physrevb.96.085124 journal journal Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter \ volume 96 ,\ pages 1058 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  65. [73]

    Lessnich , author S

    author author D. Lessnich , author S. M. \ Winter , author M. Iraola , author M. G. \ Vergniory , \ and\ author R. Valent \' ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter \ volume 104 ,\ pages 085116 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  66. [74]

    Iraola , author N

    author author M. Iraola , author N. Heinsdorf , author A. Tiwari , author D. Lessnich , author T. Mertz , author F. Ferrari , author M. H. \ Fischer , author S. M. \ Winter , author F. Pollmann , author T. Neupert , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter ...

    2021

  67. [75]

    Misawa \ and\ author Y

    author author T. Misawa \ and\ author Y. Yamaji ,\ 10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023177 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 023177 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  68. [76]

    author author M. O. \ Soldini , author N. Astrakhantsev , author M. Iraola , author A. Tiwari , author M. H. \ Fischer , author R. Valent \' , author M. G. \ Vergniory , author G. Wagner , \ and\ author T. Neupert ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 107 ,\ pages 245...

    2023

  69. [77]

    Peralta Gavensky , author S

    author author L. Peralta Gavensky , author S. Sachdev , \ and\ author N. Goldman ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.236601 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 236601 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  70. [78]

    Queiroz , author R

    author author R. Queiroz , author R. Ilan , author Z. Song , author B. Andrei Bernevig , \ and\ author A. Stern ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03529 journal journal arXiv [cond-mat.mes-hall] \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03529 arXiv:2406.03529 [cond-mat.mes-hall] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    author author I. W. \ Bulik , author T. M. \ Henderson , \ and\ author G. E. \ Scuseria ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00422 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 11 ,\ pages 3171 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  72. [80]

    Jensen ,\ @noop title Introduction to computational chemistry \ ( publisher John wiley & sons ,\ year 2017 ) NoStop

    author author F. Jensen ,\ @noop title Introduction to computational chemistry \ ( publisher John wiley & sons ,\ year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  73. [81]

    Here, we calculate G_0( | R ) from single-particle part of the Hamiltonian obtained from CAS calculations NoStop

    note The self-energy depends on the definition of G_0( | R ) . Here, we calculate G_0( | R ) from single-particle part of the Hamiltonian obtained from CAS calculations NoStop

  74. [82]

    Dzyaloshinskii ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.085113 journal journal Phys

    author author I. Dzyaloshinskii ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.085113 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 68 ,\ pages 085113 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  75. [83]

    author author T. D. \ Stanescu , author P. Phillips , \ and\ author T.-P. \ Choy ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.104503 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 75 ,\ pages 104503 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  76. [84]

    author author K. B. \ Dave , author P. W. \ Phillips , \ and\ author C. L. \ Kane ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.090403 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 110 ,\ pages 090403 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  77. [85]

    Kozik , author M

    author author E. Kozik , author M. Ferrero , \ and\ author A. Georges ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.156402 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 114 ,\ pages 156402 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  78. [86]

    author author J. T. \ Heath \ and\ author K. S. \ Bedell ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/ab890e journal journal New J. Phys. \ volume 22 ,\ pages 063011 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  79. [87]

    Fabrizio ,\ 10.1038/s41467-022-29190-y journal journal Nat

    author author M. Fabrizio ,\ 10.1038/s41467-022-29190-y journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 1561 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  80. [88]

    Wagner , author L

    author author N. Wagner , author L. Crippa , author A. Amaricci , author P. Hansmann , author M. Klett , author E. J. \ König , author T. Schäfer , author D. D. \ Sante , author J. Cano , author A. J. \ Millis , author A. Georges , \ and\ author G. Sangiovanni ,\ 10.1038/s4146...

    doi

  81. [89]

    Bollmann , author C

    author author S. Bollmann , author C. Setty , author U. F. P. \ Seifert , \ and\ author E. J. \ König ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.136504 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 133 ,\ pages 136504 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  82. [90]

    Zhou \ and\ author J

    author author Y. Zhou \ and\ author J. Liu ,\ 10.1088/1742-5468/ab74cc journal journal J. Stat. Mech. \ volume 2020 ,\ pages 033101 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  83. [91]

    Wang \ and\ author Y.-Z

    author author J. Wang \ and\ author Y.-Z. \ You ,\ 10.3390/sym14071475 journal journal Symmetry (Basel) \ volume 14 ,\ pages 1475 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  84. [92]

    Blason \ and\ author M

    author author A. Blason \ and\ author M. Fabrizio ,\ 10.1103/physrevb.108.125115 journal journal Phys. Rev. B. \ volume 108 ,\ pages 125115 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  85. [93]

    Mai , author J

    author author P. Mai , author J. Zhao , author T. A. \ Maier , author B. Bradlyn , \ and\ author P. W. \ Phillips ,\ 10.1103/physrevb.110.075105 journal journal Phys. Rev. B. \ volume 110 ,\ pages 075105 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  86. [94]

    Setty , author S

    author author C. Setty , author S. Sur , author L. Chen , author F. Xie , author H. Hu , author S. Paschen , author J. Cano , \ and\ author Q. Si ,\ 10.1103/physrevresearch.6.l032018 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 6 ,\ pages L032018 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  87. [95]

    Fukui ,\ @noop journal journal Acc

    author author K. Fukui ,\ @noop journal journal Acc. Chem. Res. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 363 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    1981

  88. [96]

    Fukui ,\ @noop journal journal J

    author author K. Fukui ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. Chem. \ volume 74 ,\ pages 4161 ( year 1970 ) NoStop

    1970

  89. [97]

    Mirzanejad \ and\ author L

    author author A. Mirzanejad \ and\ author L. Muechler ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202400786 journal journal ChemPhysChem \ volume 26 ,\ pages e202400786 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  90. [98]

    Monino , author M

    author author E. Monino , author M. Boggio-Pasqua , author A. Scemama , author D. Jacquemin , \ and\ author P.-F. \ Loos ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpca.2c02480 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. A \ volume 126 ,\ pages 4664 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  91. [99]

    Bright Wilson \ and\ author P

    author author E. Bright Wilson \ and\ author P. S. C. \ Wang ,\ 10.1016/0009-2614(72)80199-4 journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 400 ( year 1972 ) NoStop

    1972 doi

  92. [100]

    Kapustin \ and\ author L

    author author A. Kapustin \ and\ author L. Spodyneiko ,\ 10.1103/physrevb.101.235130 journal journal Phys. Rev. B. \ volume 101 ,\ pages 235130 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  93. [101]

    Chen \ and\ author G

    author author W. Chen \ and\ author G. von Gersdorff ,\ 10.21468/scipostphyscore.5.3.040 journal journal SciPost Phys. Core \ volume 5 ( year 2022 ),\ 10.21468/scipostphyscore.5.3.040 NoStop

    2022 doi

  94. [102]

    Morihashi , author O

    author author K. Morihashi , author O. Kikuchi , \ and\ author K. Suzuki ,\ 10.1016/0009-2614(82)83066-2 journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 90 ,\ pages 346 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    1982 doi

  95. [103]

    Sun , author T

    author author Q. Sun , author T. C. \ Berkelbach , author N. S. \ Blunt , author G. H. \ Booth , author S. Guo , author Z. Li , author J. Liu , author J. McClain , author E. R. \ Sayfutyarova , author S. Sharma , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.08223 ...

    2007 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Sun , author X

    author author Q. Sun , author X. Zhang , author S. Banerjee , author P. Bao , author M. Barbry , author N. S. \ Blunt , author N. A. \ Bogdanov , author G. H. \ Booth , author J. Chen , author Z.-H. \ Cui , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 153 ( year 202...

    2020

  97. [105]

    Parcollet , author M

    author author O. Parcollet , author M. Ferrero , author T. Ayral , author H. Hafermann , author I. Krivenko , author L. Messio , \ and\ author P. Seth ,\ @noop journal journal Comput. Phys. Commun. \ volume 196 ,\ pages 398 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  98. [106]

    author author G. M. J. \ Barca , author C. Bertoni , author L. Carrington , author D. Datta , author N. De Silva , author J. E. \ Deustua , author D. G. \ Fedorov , author J. R. \ Gour , author A. O. \ Gunina , author E. Guidez , author T. Harville , author S. Irle , author J....

  99. [107]

    Sun , author X

    author author Q. Sun , author X. Zhang , author S. Banerjee , author P. Bao , author M. Barbry , author N. S. \ Blunt , author N. A. \ Bogdanov , author G. H. \ Booth , author J. Chen , author Z.-H. \ Cui , author J. J. \ Eriksen , author Y. Gao , author S. Guo , author J. Her...

  100. [108]

    Helgaker , author P

    author author T. Helgaker , author P. Jorgensen , \ and\ author J. Olsen ,\ 10.1002/9781119019572 title Molecular electronic-structure theory NoStop

    doi

  101. [109]

    Parcollet , author M

    author author O. Parcollet , author M. Ferrero , author T. Ayral , author H. Hafermann , author I. Krivenko , author L. Messio , \ and\ author P. Seth ,\ 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.04.023 journal journal Comput. Phys. Commun. \ volume 196 ,\ pages 398 NoStop

    2015 doi

  102. [110]

    Needham \ and\ author R

    author author T. Needham \ and\ author R. Penrose ,\ 10.1093/oso/9780192868916.001.0001 title Visual Complex Analysis: 25th anniversary edition , \ NoStop

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.