Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 134 references

Trajectory Prediction in Dynamic Object Tracking: A Critical Study

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This critical survey argues that dynamic object tracking and trajectory prediction should form a closed feedback loop that cuts computational time and improves accuracy and reliability in complex scenarios.

desk verdict A serviceable survey of DOT and TP whose central feedback-loop claim is asserted, not supported; useful as a map, not as a contribution. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.19341 v1 pith:R6V7UO45 submitted 2025-06-24 cs.CV

Zhongping Dong , Liming Chen , Mohand Tahar Kechadi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords dynamicobjecttrackingtrajectorypredictionsinglemultiplefeedbackloopmultimodalfusioncontext-awareprivacypreserving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a critical survey of dynamic object tracking (DOT) and trajectory prediction (TP), and its central argument is that the two fields have been wrongly studied in isolation. The authors propose that DOT and TP should be wired into a closed feedback loop: tracking supplies position and velocity data, TP forecasts the next moves, and that forecast feeds back to adjust tracking parameters. They claim this joint design significantly reduces computational time and improves accuracy and reliability, especially in complex scenarios such as occlusions and dense crowds. The survey backs this with a taxonomy of tracking models and prediction models, a comparison of single-object versus multi-object tracking, a catalog of datasets and metrics, and an evaluation of 20 studies across five tracking scenarios. The paper also identifies three gaps—missing synergies, insufficient SOT/MOT differentiation, and neglect of context-awareness, multimodality, semantics, and privacy—and proposes future directions around those themes.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the four-step feedback loop between DOT and TP: (1) track an object's position, velocity, and other parameters; (2) collect trajectory data over time; (3) feed that data into TP to forecast subsequent movements; (4) use the forecast to adjust tracking parameters before the object moves out of sight. This loop is what converts the two fields from separate pipelines into one system. The paper also uses comparative tables as analytic machinery: Table 2 separates SOT from MOT, Table 6 standardizes accuracy, fairness, robustness, and calibration metrics across SOT, MOT, and TP, and Table 7 organizes 20 studies into five scenarios (S1–S5) by object-identity complexity. Together these tables are the instruments through which the survey identifies the gaps that its feedback-loop proposal is meant to close.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment on an occlusion-heavy benchmark such as MOT17 or KITTI: run the same tracker with and without a TP feedback loop, holding detection inputs fixed, and compare MOTA, identity switches, and per-frame compute. If the loop does not reduce compute or does not improve accuracy during occlusion, the paper's central claim fails. A second check would audit the tables: if any cited accuracy number in Tables 4, 5, or 7 cannot be reproduced from the original papers, the gap analysis built on those numbers loses support.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated in the paper's own terms, is that integrating DOT and TP creates a dynamic feedback loop whose four steps—track, collect data, predict, adjust—'significantly reduces the computational time of both DOT and TP techniques but also improves the accuracy and reliability of prediction and real-time object tracking in complex scenarios.' The paper argues that TP is not an optional add-on to tracking but an internal component: when an object moves out of sight, prediction keeps the track alive and lets the system proactively adjust. It treats the feedback loop as the unifying model that connects SOT and MOT to TP, and it supports the claim by surveying how recent methods already converge on this pattern, from Siamese trackers with trajectory selection networks to MOT systems that forecast in bird's-eye view space. The survey's original contributions are the explicit SOT-versus-MOT comparison, the five-scenario evaluation structure (S1–S5), and the call for context-aware, multimodal, semantic, and privacy-preserving designs.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the numbers reported in the cited papers are accurate and comparable enough to support the gap analysis, and that the proposed DOT–TP feedback loop can be built without instability or added latency, neither of which the authors demonstrate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Integrated DOT+TP systems should maintain track continuity when an object is temporarily occluded, because prediction can bridge the gap.
  • Pairing prediction with tracking should lower computational cost, since a predicted region narrows the search space for the tracker.
  • Evaluation needs a unified protocol: accuracy, fairness, robustness, and calibration metrics should be reported together for SOT, MOT, and TP.
  • Multi-modal, context-aware, semantic, and privacy-preserving methods should be treated as core system characteristics rather than optional extras.
  • Future systems should be assessed in the five scenarios S1–S5, from single-object tracking to multiple SOT algorithms running in parallel.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the feedback-loop claim holds, benchmark tracks could be re-scored jointly—MOTA or IoU plus ADE/FDE on the same clip—to reveal whether prediction actually improves tracking during occlusions.
  • Beyond the paper: a concrete test of the loop is a stress scenario with recurring occlusions; if the predicted position keeps the track alive without identity switches, the integration is doing real work rather than just adding compute.
  • Beyond the paper: the loop could be unstable under noisy detections, so a natural extension is to study convergence and latency bounds of the closed-loop system, which the survey does not address.
  • Beyond the paper: the five-scenario taxonomy suggests a standardization opportunity for the community to define a common protocol that reports fairness and calibration in tracking, not just accuracy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a survey-cum-critical-study of dynamic object tracking (DOT) and trajectory prediction (TP). It reviews DOT model families (generative, discriminative, Siamese, deep, graph-based, data association), TP model families (physics-based, classical ML, deep, RL), datasets, metrics, and a five-scenario evaluation of works that combine tracking and prediction (Tables 2–7). The paper's central contribution is presented in §1.3 and §2: a 'unified model' in which DOT and TP operate in a four-step feedback loop (Figure 2) that is claimed to 'significantly reduce the computational time of both DOT and TP techniques' while improving accuracy and reliability. The survey also identifies research gaps (lack of DOT–TP synergy, insufficient SOT/MOT differentiation, neglect of context-awareness and privacy) and proposes future directions. The abstract and introduction frame these claims as the study's main output, alongside an overview of applications in autonomous vehicles, surveillance, healthcare, and industry.

Significance. If the feedback-loop claim were substantiated, the paper would offer a compelling argument for a new architectural direction in tracking systems, and its synthesized tables (especially Table 6's metrics organized by accuracy, fairness, robustness, and calibration, and Table 7's five-scenario evaluation) would be a useful reference for researchers seeking to combine DOT and TP. The survey covers a broad literature and includes several helpful distinctions (e.g., SOT vs. MOT in Tables 2 and 3; historical vs. streamed data in Table 5). However, the central quantitative claim in §2 is asserted without derivation, simulation, or experimental evidence, and the paper's own §6.4 concedes that the long-term efficacy of integrated systems 'remains under-explored.' The absence of a stated study-selection methodology and the presence of citation errors (notably in Table 4) further reduce the reliability of the survey as a critical reference. The paper's value as a synthesis is real, but its headline contribution is currently unsupported.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Figure 2; §1.3] The central claim that the proposed DOT–TP feedback loop 'significantly reduces the computational time of both DOT and TP techniques' and 'improves the accuracy and reliability of prediction and real-time object tracking' is asserted without any quantitative or algorithmic support. Adding TP to a tracking pipeline introduces per-frame computation, so a net reduction in computational time requires a concrete mechanism (e.g., prediction-gated search windows, detector scheduling, or selective re-initialization) along with a complexity analysis or experimental measurement; none is provided. The loop also raises an unaddressed stability concern: tracker errors feed into TP, and TP predictions feed back into tracker state updates, yet no conditions (e.g., contraction, Lipschitz bounds, or bounded error propagation) are given to rule out oscillation or divergence. The paper's own §6.4 states that 'the long-term efficacy of integrated DOT and TP systems remains under-explored,' which directly contradicts the strong, unqualified claim in §2. Because this claim is the paper's main advertised contribution, it must either be supported by evidence or reframed as a hypothesis for future work.
  2. [Table 4] Table 4 misattributes reference [28]: it lists the tracking technology as 'Siamese Network based THOR tracker,' but reference [28] is Wang et al., 'Dynamic attention guided multi-trajectory analysis for single object tracking' (IEEE TCSVT, 2021), which is not the THOR tracker. THOR is mentioned in §7 as a future integration direction and in the abbreviations as 'a high-precision tracking solution,' but no primary reference for THOR is provided. This is a load-bearing reliability error because Table 4 is one of the survey's key comparative tables, and the mislabeling makes it impossible for readers to trace the claimed properties (datasets, metrics, results) to the correct source.
  3. [General survey methodology (no dedicated section)] The paper presents itself as a 'critical study' and draws conclusions about research gaps from the quantitative results in Tables 4, 5, and 7, yet it nowhere states a study-selection methodology: no search databases, search terms, inclusion/exclusion criteria, publication time window, or quality assessment are given. This omission is load-bearing for a survey whose gap claims (e.g., the triad in §1.2 and the scenario-specific gaps in §6.3) depend on the completeness and comparability of the reviewed literature. Without a reproducible protocol, readers cannot assess whether the selection of the 134 references is representative or biased, and the tabulated numeric results (e.g., 'EAO of 0.514' for [32], '0.98 F-measure' for [39]) cannot be independently verified or updated. A survey claiming to identify gaps should document its search and selection process explicitly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§6.1] The text says 'As illustrated in Figure 5,' but the only figures in the manuscript are Figures 1–4; the flowchart of historical and streamed data is labeled Figure 3. Please correct the cross-reference.
  2. [§6.3.1] The phrase 'studies like Lituan et al. [116]' misidentifies reference [116], which is Wang, L., Zhang, L., and Yi, Z., 'Trajectory predictor by using recurrent neural networks in visual tracking.' Please correct the author attribution.
  3. [Typos throughout] Several typographical errors should be fixed: 'Dateset' in the §6.1 heading, 'Wring' in the Author contributions section, 'uture' at the start of the last sentence in §5.2, 'between between' in §6.2.1, 'Trajectory Perdition' in the Table 5 title, and 'UA V' in Table 1 and the abbreviations list.
  4. [§5.2] The sentence starting 'uture research directions may include' is an incomplete sentence fragment; it should be merged with the preceding sentence.
  5. [Abbreviations] The abbreviation 'THOR' is defined as 'A high-precision tracking solution integrated into multimodal systems for enhanced contextual data analysis,' but no reference is given for this system; if THOR is an existing method, a citation is needed, and if it is the authors' proposal, that should be stated explicitly in the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey makes no fitted predictions and its load-bearing claims rest on external cited work, not on the authors' own prior results or on self-cited theorems.

full rationale

This is a survey and critical study, not a derivation with fitted parameters. The paper's central proposal, the DOT-TP feedback loop in Section 2 and Figure 2, is a conceptual framework; the claims that it 'significantly reduces the computational time' and 'improves the accuracy and reliability' are asserted without derivation or experiment. That makes the claim unsupported, but unsupported assertion is a correctness risk, not circularity under the rubric, because the claim is not shown to be equivalent to its inputs by construction. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed as a prediction; no equation in the paper maps its outputs back into its premises; and no 'uniqueness theorem' or other load-bearing result is imported from the authors' own prior work. The survey's gap statements inherit the reliability of the external cited measurements in Tables 4, 5, and 7, but reliability inheritance is not circularity. The mild framing concern that the feedback loop is proposed as the solution to a gap defined by the absence of integration is a matter of goal-setting, not a formal circular reduction, since no quantity or result is defined in terms of the conclusion. Section 6.4's concession that 'the long-term efficacy of integrated DOT and TP systems... remains under-explored' further confirms that the integration claim is an open hypothesis rather than a derived result. Therefore the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or new entities; its central claims rest on the reliability of the cited literature and on an unverified conceptual model.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Cited studies report their methods and quantitative results accurately.
    The survey's gap analysis (Sections 1.2 and Tables 4, 5, 7) compiles results from many papers without independent verification, so the conclusions inherit any inaccuracies in those reports.
  • ad hoc to paper The feedback-loop integration of DOT and TP shown in Figure 2 improves accuracy, robustness, and computational efficiency.
    Section 2 asserts this improvement without a formal model, experiments, or analysis of stability and latency, so the benefit is taken as an assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Trajectory Prediction in Dynamic Object Tracking: A Critical Study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R6V7UO45

@misc{pith2026250619341,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Trajectory Prediction in Dynamic Object Tracking: A Critical Study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R6V7UO45}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.19341}
}
read the original abstract

This study provides a detailed analysis of current advancements in dynamic object tracking (DOT) and trajectory prediction (TP) methodologies, including their applications and challenges. It covers various approaches, such as feature-based, segmentation-based, estimation-based, and learning-based methods, evaluating their effectiveness, deployment, and limitations in real-world scenarios. The study highlights the significant impact of these technologies in automotive and autonomous vehicles, surveillance and security, healthcare, and industrial automation, contributing to safety and efficiency. Despite the progress, challenges such as improved generalization, computational efficiency, reduced data dependency, and ethical considerations still exist. The study suggests future research directions to address these challenges, emphasizing the importance of multimodal data integration, semantic information fusion, and developing context-aware systems, along with ethical and privacy-preserving frameworks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

134 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology31(12), 4895–4908 31 (2021)

    Wang, X., Chen, Z., Tang, J., Luo, B., Wang, Y., Tian, Y., Wu, F.: Dynamic attention guided multi-trajectory analysis for single object tracking. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology31(12), 4895–4908 31 (2021)

    2021

  2. [32]

    Context-aware Visual Tracking with Joint Meta-updating

    Shen, Q., Li, X., Meng, F., Liang, Y.: Context-aware visual tracking with joint meta-updating. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.01513 (2022)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  3. [39]

    Pervasive and Mobile Computing100, 101914 (2024)

    Ohno, M., Ukyo, R., Amano, T., Rizk, H., Yamaguchi, H.: Privacy-preserving pedestrian tracking with path image inpainting and 3d point cloud features. Pervasive and Mobile Computing100, 101914 (2024)

    2024

  4. [1]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 37(3), pp

    Zhong, F., Bi, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, Y.: Rspt: reconstruct sur- roundings and predict trajectory for generalizable active object tracking. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 37(3), pp. 3705–3714 (2023)

    2023

  5. [2]

    Vehicular Communications, 100733 (2024)

    Bharilya, V., Kumar, N.: Machine learning for autonomous vehicle’s trajectory prediction: A comprehensive survey, challenges, and future research directions. Vehicular Communications, 100733 (2024)

    2024

  6. [3]

    Acm computing 29 surveys (CSUR)38(4), 13 (2006)

    Yilmaz, A., Javed, O., Shah, M.: Object tracking: A survey. Acm computing 29 surveys (CSUR)38(4), 13 (2006)

    2006

  7. [4]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters7(2), 2716–2723 (2022)

    Wang, C., Wang, Y., Xu, M., Crandall, D.J.: Stepwise goal-driven networks for trajectory prediction. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters7(2), 2716–2723 (2022)

    2022

  8. [5]

    IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 53(3), 1968–1981 (2022)

    Cao, X., Ren, L., Sun, C.: Dynamic target tracking control of autonomous under- water vehicle based on trajectory prediction. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 53(3), 1968–1981 (2022)

    2022

Show all 134 references
  1. [6]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research39(8), 895–935 (2020)

    Rudenko, A., Palmieri, L., Herman, M., Kitani, K.M., Gavrila, D.M., Arras, K.O.: Human motion trajectory prediction: A survey. The International Journal of Robotics Research39(8), 895–935 (2020)

    2020

  2. [7]

    Kings Road Publishing, ??? (2019)

    Biermann, C.: Football Hackers: The Science and Art of a Data Revolution. Kings Road Publishing, ??? (2019)

    2019

  3. [8]

    Neural Computing and Applications32, 13155–13171 (2020)

    Ng, M.-K., Chong, Y.-W., Ko, K.-m., Park, Y.-H., Leau, Y.-B.: Adaptive path finding algorithm in dynamic environment for warehouse robot. Neural Computing and Applications32, 13155–13171 (2020)

    2020

  4. [9]

    International journal of critical infrastructure protection26, 100310 (2019)

    Ali, B.S.: Traffic management for drones flying in the city. International journal of critical infrastructure protection26, 100310 (2019)

    2019

  5. [10]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Adeli, V., Ehsanpour, M., Reid, I., Niebles, J.C., Savarese, S., Adeli, E., Rezatofighi, H.: Tripod: Human trajectory and pose dynamics forecasting in the wild. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 13390–13400 (2021)

    2021

  6. [11]

    Drones5(3), 62 (2021)

    Conte, C., Alteriis, G., Schiano Lo Moriello, R., Accardo, D., Rufino, G.: Drone trajectory segmentation for real-time and adaptive time-of-flight prediction. Drones5(3), 62 (2021)

    2021

  7. [12]

    Promet- Traffic&Transportation35(4), 462–484 (2023)

    Yang, L., Bin Mohamed, A.S.A., Ali, M.K.B.M.: An improved object detec- tion and trajectory prediction method for traffic conflicts analysis. Promet- Traffic&Transportation35(4), 462–484 (2023)

    2023

  8. [13]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 29, 8355–8367 (2020)

    Wu, M., Ling, H., Bi, N., Gao, S., Hu, Q., Sheng, H., Yu, J.: Visual tracking with multiview trajectory prediction. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 29, 8355–8367 (2020)

    2020

  9. [14]

    International Journal of Computer Vision129, 845–881 (2021)

    Dendorfer, P., Osep, A., Milan, A., Schindler, K., Cremers, D., Reid, I., Roth, S., Leal-Taix´ e, L.: Motchallenge: A benchmark for single-camera multiple target tracking. International Journal of Computer Vision129, 845–881 (2021)

    2021

  10. [15]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research32(11), 1231–1237 30 (2013)

    Geiger, A., Lenz, P., Stiller, C., Urtasun, R.: Vision meets robotics: The kitti dataset. The International Journal of Robotics Research32(11), 1231–1237 30 (2013)

    2013

  11. [16]

    In: 2017 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO), pp

    Balaji, S., Karthikeyan, S.: A survey on moving object tracking using image processing. In: 2017 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO), pp. 469–474 (2017). IEEE

    2017

  12. [17]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03098 (2018)

    Fiaz, M., Mahmood, A., Jung, S.K.: Tracking noisy targets: A review of recent object tracking approaches. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03098 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  13. [18]

    Journal of New Media1(2), 63 (2019)

    Bi, F., Ma, X., Chen, W., Fang, W., Chen, H., Li, J., Assefa, B.: Review on video object tracking based on deep learning. Journal of New Media1(2), 63 (2019)

    2019

  14. [19]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.11410 (2022)

    Han, R., Feng, W., Guo, Q., Hu, Q.: Single object tracking research: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.11410 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  15. [20]

    Artificial Intelligence Review56(Suppl 1), 1417–1477 (2023)

    Fu, C., Lu, K., Zheng, G., Ye, J., Cao, Z., Li, B., Lu, G.: Siamese object tracking for unmanned aerial vehicle: A review and comprehensive analysis. Artificial Intelligence Review56(Suppl 1), 1417–1477 (2023)

    2023

  16. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.04639 (2018)

    Georgiou, H., Karagiorgou, S., Kontoulis, Y., Pelekis, N., Petrou, P., Scarlatti, D., Theodoridis, Y.: Moving objects analytics: Survey on future location & trajectory prediction methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.04639 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  17. [22]

    Sensors21(22), 7543 (2021)

    Sighencea, B.I., Stanciu, R.I., C˘ aleanu, C.D.: A review of deep learning-based methods for pedestrian trajectory prediction. Sensors21(22), 7543 (2021)

    2021

  18. [23]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles7(3), 652–674 (2022)

    Huang, Y., Du, J., Yang, Z., Zhou, Z., Zhang, L., Chen, H.: A survey on trajectory-prediction methods for autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles7(3), 652–674 (2022)

    2022

  19. [24]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2023)

    Golchoubian, M., Ghafurian, M., Dautenhahn, K., Azad, N.L.: Pedestrian trajec- tory prediction in pedestrian-vehicle mixed environments: A systematic review. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2023)

    2023

  20. [25]

    Robotics13(1), 1 (2023)

    Schuetz, E., Flohr, F.B.: A review of trajectory prediction methods for the vulnerable road user. Robotics13(1), 1 (2023)

    2023

  21. [26]

    Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing39(2), 611–630 (2020)

    Elhoseny, M.: Multi-object detection and tracking (modt) machine learning model for real-time video surveillance systems. Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing39(2), 611–630 (2020)

    2020

  22. [27]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (2023)

    Cong, P., Xiao, Y., Wan, X., Deng, M., Li, J., Zhang, X.: Dacr-amtp: adaptive multi-modal vehicle trajectory prediction for dynamic drivable areas based on collision risk. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (2023)

    2023

  23. [29]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning, pp

    Zhang, L., Su, P.-H., Hoang, J., Haynes, G.C., Marchetti-Bowick, M.: Map- adaptive goal-based trajectory prediction. In: Conference on Robot Learning, pp. 1371–1383 (2021). PMLR

    2021

  24. [30]

    Electronics10(1), 43 (2020)

    Mehmood, K., Jalil, A., Ali, A., Khan, B., Murad, M., Khan, W.U., He, Y.: Context-aware and occlusion handling mechanism for online visual object tracking. Electronics10(1), 43 (2020)

    2020

  25. [31]

    IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 51(12), 6066–6079 (2020)

    Wang, W., Zhang, K., Lv, M., Wang, J.: Hierarchical spatiotemporal context- aware correlation filters for visual tracking. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 51(12), 6066–6079 (2020)

    2020

  26. [33]

    Multimedia Tools and Applications79, 15095–15115 (2020)

    Zhang, J., Jin, X., Sun, J., Wang, J., Sangaiah, A.K.: Spatial and semantic convolutional features for robust visual object tracking. Multimedia Tools and Applications79, 15095–15115 (2020)

    2020

  27. [34]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(2), 3066–3073 (2020)

    Sun, Y., Zuo, W., Liu, M.: See the future: A semantic segmentation network predicting ego-vehicle trajectory with a single monocular camera. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(2), 3066–3073 (2020)

    2020

  28. [35]

    In: Proc

    Morton, P., Douillard, B., Underwood, J.: An evaluation of dynamic object tracking with 3d lidar. In: Proc. of the Australasian Conference on Robotics & Automation (ACRA), p. 38 (2011)

    2011

  29. [36]

    International Journal of Computer Vision127, 302–321 (2019)

    Zhou, B., Zhao, H., Puig, X., Xiao, T., Fidler, S., Barriuso, A., Torralba, A.: Semantic understanding of scenes through the ade20k dataset. International Journal of Computer Vision127, 302–321 (2019)

    2019

  30. [37]

    IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security16, 5381–5396 (2021)

    Tian, X., Zheng, P., Huang, J.: Robust privacy-preserving motion detection and object tracking in encrypted streaming video. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security16, 5381–5396 (2021)

    2021

  31. [38]

    Giorgi, G., Abbasi, W., Saracino, A.: Privacy-preserving analysis for remote video anomaly detection in real life environments. J. Wirel. Mob. Networks Ubiquitous Comput. Dependable Appl.13(1), 112–136 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Applied Intelligence50(10), 3201–3218 (2020) 32

    Kumar, A., Walia, G.S., Sharma, K.: A novel approach for multi-cue feature fusion for robust object tracking. Applied Intelligence50(10), 3201–3218 (2020) 32

    2020

  33. [41]

    IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2023)

    Wang, H., Liu, J., Su, Y., Yang, X.: Trajectory guided robust visual object tracking with selective remedy. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp

    Vincent, J., Labb´ e, M., Lauzon, J.-S., Grondin, F., Comtois-Rivet, P.-M., Michaud, F.: Dynamic object tracking and masking for visual slam. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 4974–4979 (2020). IEEE

    2020

  35. [43]

    In: 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Kim, Z.: Real time object tracking based on dynamic feature grouping with background subtraction. In: 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1–8 (2008). IEEE

    2008

  36. [44]

    Robotica42(3), 891–910 (2024)

    Ma, T., Jiang, G., Ou, Y., Xu, S.: Semantic geometric fusion multi-object tracking and lidar odometry in dynamic environment. Robotica42(3), 891–910 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Sensors 21(23), 7888 (2021)

    Lo, L.-Y., Yiu, C.H., Tang, Y., Yang, A.-S., Li, B., Wen, C.-Y.: Dynamic object tracking on autonomous uav system for surveillance applications. Sensors 21(23), 7888 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Sensors18(5), 1506 (2018)

    Yang, K., Wang, K., Bergasa, L.M., Romera, E., Hu, W., Sun, D., Sun, J., Cheng, R., Chen, T., L´ opez, E.: Unifying terrain awareness for the visually impaired through real-time semantic segmentation. Sensors18(5), 1506 (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    ICT Express (2024)

    Moon, J., Bukhari, M., Kim, C., Nam, Y., Maqsood, M., Rho, S.: Object detec- tion under the lens of privacy: A critical survey of methods, challenges, and future directions. ICT Express (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.06000 (2015)

    D’Acquisto, G., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Kikiras, P., Torra, V., Montjoye, Y.-A., Bourka, A.: Privacy by design in big data: an overview of privacy enhancing technologies in the era of big data analytics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.06000 (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation64, 102603 (2019)

    Yan, B., Xiao, L., Zhang, H., Xu, D., Ruan, L., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y.: An adaptive template matching-based single object tracking algorithm with parallel acceler- ation. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation64, 102603 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Sun, M., Xiao, J., Lim, E.G., Zhang, B., Zhao, Y.: Fast template matching and update for video object tracking and segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 10791–10799 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Optical engineering46(8), 087202–087202 (2007) 33

    Zhang, B., Tian, W., Jin, Z.: Efficient hybrid appearance model for object tracking with occlusion handling. Optical engineering46(8), 087202–087202 (2007) 33

    2007

  44. [52]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Bhat, G., Danelljan, M., Gool, L.V., Timofte, R.: Learning discriminative model prediction for tracking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 6182–6191 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Kart, U., Lukezic, A., Kristan, M., Kamarainen, J.-K., Matas, J.: Object track- ing by reconstruction with view-specific discriminative correlation filters. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1339–1348 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing24(12), 5723–5738 (2015)

    Zhang, S., Zhao, S., Sui, Y., Zhang, L.: Single object tracking with fuzzy least squares support vector machine. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing24(12), 5723–5738 (2015)

    2015

  47. [55]

    Computational Visual Media3, 325–335 (2017)

    Li, J., Zhou, X., Chan, S., Chen, S.: Object tracking using a convolutional net- work and a structured output svm. Computational Visual Media3, 325–335 (2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    In: 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Bolme, D.S., Beveridge, J.R., Draper, B.A., Lui, Y.M.: Visual object tracking using adaptive correlation filters. In: 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2544–2550 (2010). IEEE

    2010

  49. [57]

    IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement71, 1–14 (2022)

    Ma, S., Zhao, Z., Hou, Z., Zhang, L., Yang, X., Pu, L.: Correlation filters based on multi-expert and game theory for visual object tracking. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement71, 1–14 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Computers & Electrical Engineering86, 106755 (2020)

    Xu, H., Zhu, Y.: Real-time object tracking based on improved fully-convolutional siamese network. Computers & Electrical Engineering86, 106755 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    IEEE Sensors Journal21(4), 4995–5011 (2020)

    Fang, Z., Zhou, S., Cui, Y., Scherer, S.: 3d-siamrpn: An end-to-end learning method for real-time 3d single object tracking using raw point cloud. IEEE Sensors Journal21(4), 4995–5011 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14, pp

    Held, D., Thrun, S., Savarese, S.: Learning to track at 100 fps with deep regres- sion networks. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14, pp. 749–765 (2016). Springer

    2016

  53. [61]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12202 (2022)

    Yang, F., Zhang, X., Liu, B.: Video object tracking based on yolov7 and deepsort. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12202 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Nam, H., Han, B.: Learning multi-domain convolutional neural networks for visual tracking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4293–4302 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    In: 2020 International Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA), pp

    Ma, S., Zhang, L., Pu, L., Yang, X., Hou, Z.: An adaptive model update object tracking algorithm based on densenet features. In: 2020 International Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA), pp. 321–325 (2020). IEEE 34

    2020

  56. [64]

    Neurocomputing410, 229–236 (2020)

    Lu, Y., Yuan, Y., Wang, Q.: A dense connection based network for real-time object tracking. Neurocomputing410, 229–236 (2020)

    2020

  57. [65]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence33(9), 1806–1819 (2011)

    Berclaz, J., Fleuret, F., Turetken, E., Fua, P.: Multiple object tracking using k- shortest paths optimization. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence33(9), 1806–1819 (2011)

    2011

  58. [66]

    In: 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp

    Zheng, D., Xiong, H., Zheng, Y.F.: A structured learning-based graph match- ing for dynamic multiple object tracking. In: 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 2333–2336 (2011). IEEE

    2011

  59. [67]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Schulter, S., Vernaza, P., Choi, W., Chandraker, M.: Deep network flow for multi- object tracking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 6951–6960 (2017)

    2017

  60. [68]

    In: 2016 6th International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET), pp

    Sahbani, B., Adiprawita, W.: Kalman filter and iterative-hungarian algorithm implementation for low complexity point tracking as part of fast multiple object tracking system. In: 2016 6th International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET), pp. 109–115 (2016). IEEE

    2016

  61. [69]

    Expert Systems with Applications39(16), 12319– 12331 (2012)

    Zulkifley, M.A., Moran, B.: Robust hierarchical multiple hypothesis tracker for multiple-object tracking. Expert Systems with Applications39(16), 12319– 12331 (2012)

    2012

  62. [70]

    In: 2005 First International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grid, pp

    Liu, J., Chen, H., Hu, J.: A study on batch processing model in workflow. In: 2005 First International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grid, pp. 13–13 (2005). IEEE

    2005

  63. [71]

    In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp

    Wojke, N., Bewley, A., Paulus, D.: Simple online and realtime tracking with a deep association metric. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 3645–3649 (2017). IEEE

    2017

  64. [72]

    IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology25(3), 367–386 (2014)

    Li, T., Chang, H., Wang, M., Ni, B., Hong, R., Yan, S.: Crowded scene analysis: A survey. IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology25(3), 367–386 (2014)

    2014

  65. [73]

    IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology8(3), 508–518 (2000)

    Lin, C.-F., Ulsoy, A.G., LeBlanc, D.J.: Vehicle dynamics and external distur- bance estimation for vehicle path prediction. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology8(3), 508–518 (2000)

    2000

  66. [74]

    In: 2006 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp

    Pepy, R., Lambert, A., Mounier, H.: Reducing navigation errors by planning with realistic vehicle model. In: 2006 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 300–307 (2006). IEEE

    2006

  67. [75]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10(4), 678–687 (2009) 35

    Kaempchen, N., Schiele, B., Dietmayer, K.: Situation assessment of an autonomous emergency brake for arbitrary vehicle-to-vehicle collision scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10(4), 678–687 (2009) 35

    2009

  68. [76]

    In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2004, pp

    Kaempchen, N., Weiss, K., Schaefer, M., Dietmayer, K.C.: Imm object tracking for high dynamic driving maneuvers. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2004, pp. 825–830 (2004). IEEE

    2004

  69. [77]

    IF AC-PapersOnLine 50(1), 13860–13865 (2017)

    Okamoto, K., Berntorp, K., Di Cairano, S.: Driver intention-based vehicle threat assessment using random forests and particle filtering. IF AC-PapersOnLine 50(1), 13860–13865 (2017)

    2017

  70. [78]

    In: Summer School on Machine Learning, pp

    Rasmussen, C.E.: Gaussian processes in machine learning. In: Summer School on Machine Learning, pp. 63–71. Springer, ??? (2003)

    2003

  71. [79]

    In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol

    Mandalia, H.M., Salvucci, M.D.D.: Using support vector machines for lane- change detection. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 49, pp. 1965–1969 (2005). SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA

    2005

  72. [80]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems16(1), 284–296 (2014)

    Qiao, S., Shen, D., Wang, X., Han, N., Zhu, W.: A self-adaptive parame- ter selection trajectory prediction approach via hidden markov models. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems16(1), 284–296 (2014)

    2014

  73. [81]

    PhD thesis, UC Berkley, Dept

    Murphy, K.P.: Dynamic bayesian networks: Representation, inference and learning, dissertation. PhD thesis, UC Berkley, Dept. Comp. Sci (2002)

    2002

  74. [82]

    In: 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp

    Diehl, F., Brunner, T., Le, M.T., Knoll, A.: Graph neural networks for modelling traffic participant interaction. In: 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 695–701 (2019). IEEE

    2019

  75. [83]

    In: 2023 Inter- national Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Communication and Computers (ELEXCOM), pp

    Bharilya, V., Kumar, N.: A survey of the state-of-the-art reinforcement learning- based techniques for autonomous vehicle trajectory prediction. In: 2023 Inter- national Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Communication and Computers (ELEXCOM), pp. 1–6 (2023). IEEE

    2023

  76. [84]

    IEEE Signal Processing Magazine38(1), 87–96 (2020)

    Fernando, T., Denman, S., Sridharan, S., Fookes, C.: Deep inverse reinforcement learning for behavior prediction in autonomous driving: Accurate forecasts of vehicle motion. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine38(1), 87–96 (2020)

    2020

  77. [85]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems24(3), 2874–2887 (2022)

    Bhattacharyya, R., Wulfe, B., Phillips, D.J., Kuefler, A., Morton, J., Senanayake, R., Kochenderfer, M.J.: Modeling human driving behavior through generative adversarial imitation learning. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems24(3), 2874–2887 (2022)

    2022

  78. [86]

    In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Xu, Y., Chakhachiro, T., Kathuria, T., Ghaffari, M.: Solo t-dirl: Socially-aware dynamic local planner based on trajectory-ranked deep inverse reinforcement learning. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 12045–12051 (2023). IEEE

    2023

  79. [87]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Danelljan, M., Hager, G., Shahbaz Khan, F., Felsberg, M.: Learning spatially 36 regularized correlation filters for visual tracking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 4310–4318 (2015)

    2015

  80. [88]

    In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2016 Workshops: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 8-10 and 15-16, 2016, Proceedings, Part II, pp

    Roffo, G., Melzi, S.,et al.: The visual object tracking vot2016 challenge results. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2016 Workshops: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 8-10 and 15-16, 2016, Proceedings, Part II, pp. 777–823 (2016). Springer International Publishing

    2016

  81. [89]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Alamri, H., Cartillier, V., Das, A., Wang, J., Cherian, A., Essa, I., Batra, D., Marks, T.K., Hori, C., Anderson, P.,et al.: Audio visual scene-aware dialog. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7558–7567 (2019)

    2019

  82. [90]

    In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14, pp

    Mueller, M., Smith, N., Ghanem, B.: A benchmark and simulator for uav track- ing. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14, pp. 445–461 (2016). Springer

    2016

  83. [91]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles8(2), 1863–1873 (2022)

    Andle, J., Soucy, N., Socolow, S., Sekeh, S.Y.: The stanford drone dataset is more complex than we think: An analysis of key characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles8(2), 1863–1873 (2022)

    2022

  84. [92]

    In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp

    Wang, G., Wang, Y., Zhang, H., Gu, R., Hwang, J.-N.: Exploit the connectiv- ity: Multi-object tracking with trackletnet. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 482–490 (2019)

    2019

  85. [93]

    In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops, pp

    Kristan, M., Leonardis, A., Matas, J., Felsberg, M., Pflugfelder, R., ˇCehovin Zajc, L., Vojir, T., Bhat, G., Lukezic, A., Eldesokey, A.,et al.: The sixth visual object tracking vot2018 challenge results. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Wor...

    2018

  86. [94]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence43(5), 1562–1577 (2019)

    Huang, L., Zhao, X., Huang, K.: Got-10k: A large high-diversity benchmark for generic object tracking in the wild. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence43(5), 1562–1577 (2019)

    2019

  87. [95]

    International Journal of Computer Vision129, 439–461 (2021)

    Fan, H., Bai, H., Lin, L., Yang, F., Chu, P., Deng, G., Yu, S., Harshit, Huang, M., Liu, J.,et al.: Lasot: A high-quality large-scale single object tracking benchmark. International Journal of Computer Vision129, 439–461 (2021)

    2021

  88. [96]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Caesar, H., Bankiti, V., Lang, A.H., Vora, S., Liong, V.E., Xu, Q., Krish- nan, A., Pan, Y., Baldan, G., Beijbom, O.: nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11621–11631 (2020)

    2020

  89. [97]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.09003 (2020) 37

    Dendorfer, P., Rezatofighi, H., Milan, A., Shi, J., Cremers, D., Reid, I., Roth, S., Schindler, K., Leal-Taix´ e, L.: Mot20: A benchmark for multi object tracking in crowded scenes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.09003 (2020) 37

    2020 arXiv

  90. [98]

    In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part V 16, pp

    Dave, A., Khurana, T., Tokmakov, P., Schmid, C., Ramanan, D.: Tao: A large- scale benchmark for tracking any object. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part V 16, pp. 436–454 (2020). Springer

    2020

  91. [99]

    10849–10859 (2021)

    Fabbri, M., Bras´ o, G., Maugeri, G., Cetintas, O., Gasparini, R., Oˇ sep, A., Calderara, S., Leal-Taix´ e, L., Cucchiara, R.: Motsynth: How can synthetic data help pedestrian detection and tracking? In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, ...

    2021

  92. [100]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.00038 (2020)

    Schwall, M., Daniel, T., Victor, T., Favaro, F., Hohnhold, H.: Waymo public road safety performance data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.00038 (2020)

    2020 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Drones3(4), 82 (2019)

    Perera, A.G., Law, Y.W., Chahl, J.: Drone-action: An outdoor recorded drone video dataset for action recognition. Drones3(4), 82 (2019)

    2019

  94. [102]

    In: 2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA), pp

    Karagkioules, T., Tsilimantos, D., Valentin, S., Wamser, F., Zeidler, B., Seufert, M., Loh, F., Tran-Gia, P.: A public dataset for youtube’s mobile streaming client. In: 2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA), pp. 1–6 (2018). IEEE

    2018

  95. [103]

    Scientific data5(1), 1–14 (2018)

    Kujala, R., Weckstr¨ om, C., Darst, R.K., Mladenovi´ c, M.N., Saram¨ aki, J.: A collection of public transport network data sets for 25 cities. Scientific data5(1), 1–14 (2018)

    2018

  96. [104]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Rezatofighi, H., Tsoi, N., Gwak, J., Sadeghian, A., Reid, I., Savarese, S.: Gener- alized intersection over union: A metric and a loss for bounding box regression. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 658–666 (2019)

    2019

  97. [105]

    Applied Mathematics and Computation175(2), 1716–1729 (2006)

    K¨ oksoy, O.: Multiresponse robust design: Mean square error (mse) criterion. Applied Mathematics and Computation175(2), 1716–1729 (2006)

    2006

  98. [106]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Wang, Z., Zheng, L., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Wang, S.: Towards real-time multi-object tracking. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 107–122 (2020). Springer

    2020

  99. [107]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Luo, W., Yang, B., Urtasun, R.: Fast and furious: Real time end-to-end 3d detection, tracking and motion forecasting with a single convolutional net. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3569–3577 (2018)

    2018

  100. [108]

    Pattern Recognition111, 107679 (2021)

    Zhao, S., Xu, T., Wu, X.-J., Zhu, X.-F.: Adaptive feature fusion for visual object tracking. Pattern Recognition111, 107679 (2021)

    2021

  101. [109]

    IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems34(9), 38 5497–5516 (2021)

    Jiao, L., Wang, D., Bai, Y., Chen, P., Liu, F.: Deep learning in visual tracking: A review. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems34(9), 38 5497–5516 (2021)

    2021

  102. [110]

    In: Handbook of Income Distribution vol

    Roemer, J.E., Trannoy, A.: Equality of opportunity. In: Handbook of Income Distribution vol. 2, pp. 217–300. Elsevier, ??? (2015)

    2015

  103. [111]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2022)

    Jiang, Z., Han, X., Fan, C., Yang, F., Mostafavi, A., Hu, X.: Generalized demo- graphic parity for group fairness. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2022)

    2022

  104. [112]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 38(19), pp

    Cao, C., Chen, X., Wang, J., Song, Q., Tan, R., Li, Y.-H.: Cctr: Calibrating tra- jectory prediction for uncertainty-aware motion planning in autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 38(19), pp. 20949–20957 (2024)

    2024

  105. [113]

    Calibration and validation of analytical methods: a sampling of current approaches109 (2018)

    Moosavi, S.M., Ghassabian, S.: Linearity of calibration curves for analytical methods: A review of criteria for assessment of method reliability. Calibration and validation of analytical methods: a sampling of current approaches109 (2018)

    2018

  106. [114]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2023)

    Feng, C., Zhou, H., Lin, H., Zhang, Z., Xu, Z., Zhang, C., Zhou, B., Shen, S.: Macformer: Map-agent coupled transformer for real-time and robust trajectory prediction. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2023)

    2023

  107. [115]

    In: 2006 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems, pp

    Weser, M., Westhoff, D., Huser, M., Zhang, J.: Multimodal people tracking and trajectory prediction based on learned generalized motion patterns. In: 2006 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems, pp. 541–546 (2006). IEEE

    2006

  108. [116]

    IEEE transactions on cybernetics47(10), 3172–3183 (2017)

    Wang, L., Zhang, L., Yi, Z.: Trajectory predictor by using recurrent neural networks in visual tracking. IEEE transactions on cybernetics47(10), 3172–3183 (2017)

    2017

  109. [117]

    Applied Intelligence, 1–15 (2022)

    Xu, L., Diao, Z., Wei, Y.: Non-linear target trajectory prediction for robust visual tracking. Applied Intelligence, 1–15 (2022)

    2022

  110. [118]

    In: 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Leibe, B., Schindler, K., Van Gool, L.: Coupled detection and trajectory esti- mation for multi-object tracking. In: 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1–8 (2007). IEEE

    2007

  111. [119]

    In: 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), pp

    Fernando, T., Denman, S., Sridharan, S., Fookes, C.: Tracking by prediction: A deep generative model for mutli-person localisation and tracking. In: 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), pp. 1122–1132 (2018). IEEE

    2018

  112. [120]

    In: 2019 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), pp

    Li, X., Liu, Y., Wang, K., Yan, Y., Wang, F.-Y.: Multi-target tracking with tra- jectory prediction and re-identification. In: 2019 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), pp. 5028–5033 (2019). IEEE 39

    2019

  113. [121]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10950 (2021)

    Girbau, A., Gir´ o-i-Nieto, X., Rius, I., Marqu´ es, F.: Multiple object track- ing with mixture density networks for trajectory estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10950 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Dendorfer, P., Yugay, V., Osep, A., Leal-Taix´ e, L.: Quo vadis: Is trajectory forecasting the key towards long-term multi-object tracking? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems35, 15657–15671 (2022)

    2022

  115. [123]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Jeon, Y., Tran, D.Q., Park, M., Park, S.: Leveraging future trajectory prediction for multi-camera people tracking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 5398–5407 (2023)

    2023

  116. [124]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.12887 (2019)

    Fuchs, F.B., Kosiorek, A.R., Sun, L., Jones, O.P., Posner, I.: End-to-end recur- rent multi-object tracking and trajectory prediction with relational reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.12887 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  117. [125]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems23(6), 5668–5677 (2021)

    Wu, H., Han, W., Wen, C., Li, X., Wang, C.: 3d multi-object tracking in point clouds based on prediction confidence-guided data association. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems23(6), 5668–5677 (2021)

    2021

  118. [126]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Weng, X., Ivanovic, B., Kitani, K., Pavone, M.: Whose track is it anyway? improving robustness to tracking errors with affinity-based trajectory prediction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 6573–6582 (2022)

    2022

  119. [127]

    Electronics12(23), 4720 (2023)

    Zhang, P., Jing, Q., Zhao, X., Dong, L., Lei, W., Zhang, W., Lin, Z.: A multi-object tracking approach combining contextual features and trajectory prediction. Electronics12(23), 4720 (2023)

    2023

  120. [128]

    In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp

    Wan, X., Zhou, S., Wang, J., Meng, R.: Multiple object tracking by trajectory map regression with temporal priors embedding. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 1377–1386 (2021)

    2021

  121. [129]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.10543 (2021)

    Kesa, O., Styles, O., Sanchez, V.: Joint learning architecture for multiple object tracking and trajectory forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.10543 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  122. [130]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Chen, X., Shi, S., Zhang, C., Zhu, B., Wang, Q., Cheung, K.C., See, S., Li, H.: Trajectoryformer: 3d object tracking transformer with predictive trajec- tory hypotheses. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 18527–18536 (2023)

    2023

  123. [131]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.01059 (2017)

    He, Q., Wu, J., Yu, G., Zhang, C.: Sot for mot. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.01059 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Knowledge and Information Systems63(8), 2109–2127 (2021) 40

    Liang, T., Lan, L., Zhang, X., Luo, Z.: A generic mot boosting framework by combining cues from sot, tracklet and re-identification. Knowledge and Information Systems63(8), 2109–2127 (2021) 40

    2021

  125. [133]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Zheng, L., Tang, M., Chen, Y., Zhu, G., Wang, J., Lu, H.: Improving multiple object tracking with single object tracking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2453–2462 (2021)

    2021

  126. [134]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing61, 1–14 (2023) 41

    Zhang, J., Zhang, X., Huang, Z., Cheng, X., Feng, J., Jiao, L.: Bidirectional multiple object tracking based on trajectory criteria in satellite videos. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing61, 1–14 (2023) 41

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.