Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Generation of high power spatially-structured laser pulses via forward Raman amplification in plasma

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that forward Raman amplification in plasma can amplify any paraxial spatially-structured laser beam—LG, BG, and Airy—by 10^4 to 10^5 in intensity while self-compressing it to near-single-cycle duration, verified by 2D…

desk verdict A solid simulation-based proposal for amplifying structured beams in plasma, but the 'universal' theory overreaches: the transverse-profile cancellation is asserted, not derived, and the simulations cover only favorable flat-top pump cases. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.21979 v1 pith:AA4HSNL3 submitted 2025-06-27 physics.plasm-ph physics.optics

Zhi-Yu Lei , Su-Ming Weng , Min Chen , Jie Zhang , Zheng-Ming Sheng This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-phphysics.optics PACS 52.38.-r52.65.Rr
keywords forwardRamanamplificationplasmaspatially-structuredlightLaguerre-GaussianbeamBessel-GaussianAiryorbitalangularmomentumparticle-in-cellsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that forward Raman amplification in plasma can amplify spatially-structured laser beams, including Laguerre-Gaussian vortex beams, Bessel-Gaussian beams, and Airy beams, by $10^{4}$ to $10^{5}$ in intensity while self-compressing them to near-single-cycle duration. The authors argue that under the paraxial approximation the three-wave coupling equations reduce to the same one-dimensional form regardless of transverse profile, so the amplification laws derived for Gaussian beams apply unchanged to structured beams. Using 2D and 3D particle-in-cell simulations, they show an initial seed of about $10^{12}$ W/cm² at 1.8 micrometers reaching $10^{16}$ to $10^{17}$ W/cm², with output durations around 10 fs, in under 500 micrometers of plasma. If correct, this removes the damage-threshold bottleneck of solid-state optics and offers a route to petawatt-class structured light for high-field and ultrafast science.

What carries the argument

The analytical backbone is the three-wave coupling system for the pump, seed, and electron plasma wave, with each envelope separated into longitudinal and transverse parts. Under the paraxial approximation, with the assumption that the transverse profiles stay fixed, the equations reduce to exactly the one-dimensional FRA equations; the linear solution a1 = a10 I0(2g $\sqrt$(zeta tau)) and the nonlinear scaling a1 ≈ $a00^{2}$ a10 delta tau omega0/(omega0 - omega_pe) then apply to arbitrary transverse profiles. The same derivation yields the OAM phase-matching condition l0 = $\ell^1$ + $\ell^2$ and predicts both plasma-wave OAM and new seed OAM modes when the pump is circularly polarized.

What would settle it

A 2D PIC simulation of an Airy seed whose transverse acceleration length is small enough that the main lobe shifts by several transverse scales over 500 micrometers of plasma, compared against the one-dimensional scaling of Equation (13): if the measured peak gain falls substantially below the Gaussian-seed prediction, the claimed universality is violated. A tabletop experiment that amplifies a Bessel-Gaussian seed in a 2.2 × $10^{20}$ $cm^{-3}$ plasma and finds a growth rate differing from the Gaussian-seed rate would falsify the model in a similar way.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that forward Raman amplification is a universal amplifier for paraxial structured beams: any transverse profile T(x, r_perp) obeys the same one-dimensional three-wave evolution as a Gaussian beam. For Laguerre-Gaussian beams, orbital angular momentum is conserved via l0 = $\ell^1$ + $\ell^2$, the electron plasma wave acquires the difference OAM, and a circularly polarized pump can generate a new OAM component in the orthogonal polarization. PIC simulations confirm intensity amplification factors of $10^{4}$ to $10^{5}$ for LG (l = 1, 2, 3), BG, and Airy seeds, together with self-phase-modulation compression to near-single-cycle pulses, while retaining the structured transverse profile.

Load-bearing premise

The scheme is universal only if every structured beam keeps its transverse shape during the short plasma transit, an assumption that is clearly strained for Airy beams whose main peak curves sideways as they propagate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A weak 10^12 W/cm² structured seed can be amplified to 10^16 to 10^17 W/cm² in under 500 micrometers and a few hundred femtoseconds, so experiments require only compact plasma lengths and femtosecond-scale timing.
  • The amplified LG beam retains its topological charge while its plasma wave carries OAM, giving a way to generate and diagnose OAM-carrying plasma waves.
  • Self-phase modulation compresses the amplified seed to roughly 10 fs for LG beams and sub-cycle for Airy beams with an intense pump, so intensity enhancement continues after the amplification stage.
  • The same formalism applies to other paraxial structured beams such as Hermite-Gaussian and vector beams, and cascaded FRA steps can push the wavelength from 1.0 to 1.8 to 3.3 micrometers.
  • Compared with backward SRS and SBS amplification, the forward scheme achieves comparable or better amplification with a weaker seed and shorter pump, while avoiding head-on collision alignment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the universality claim holds, forward Raman amplification could become the standard final amplifier for structured-light beamlines, replacing damage-prone transmissive optics with a plasma stage that is itself the gain medium.
  • The predicted OAM transfer to the electron plasma wave suggests FRA could be used to prepare structured plasma wakes for particle acceleration, an application the paper mentions but does not develop.
  • A testable extension would be to measure the amplified Airy beam's peak position versus propagation distance; if the transverse shift exceeds the FRA interaction length for realistic parameters, the universal model would need a two-dimensional correction term.
  • The co-propagating geometry and short interaction also suppress plasma instabilities enough that high-repetition-rate operation may be practical, though repetition-rate behavior was not simulated.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes using forward Raman amplification (FRA) in plasma to amplify spatially structured seed pulses, specifically Laguerre-Gaussian, Bessel-Gaussian, and Airy beams, by co-propagating them with a Gaussian or super-Gaussian pump pulse. The authors develop an analytical three-wave coupling model that is reduced to a one-dimensional form by assuming the transverse beam profiles are frozen during propagation, and they then present 2D and 3D PIC simulations showing intensity amplification factors of roughly 1e4--1e5, self-compression to near-single-cycle or sub-cycle durations, OAM conservation in the plasma wave, and generation of new OAM components in the seed. The paper also compares the FRA scheme with backward Raman and Brillouin amplification approaches.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the scheme is an attractive route to high-power structured light because it avoids solid-state damage thresholds, operates in a compact sub-millimeter plasma, and could support petawatt-class outputs with few-cycle durations. The paper's strengths include multi-dimensional PIC simulations for LG and BG beams, a concrete OAM-matching analysis with a demonstration of new OAM mode generation, and a direct comparison table with prior plasma amplification work. The main weakness is that the analytical claim of transverse-profile independence is only justified under restrictive conditions that are not stated quantitatively, so the 'universal applicability' conclusion currently overreaches the evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Eqs. (7)-(11)] The reduction to the 1D equations is formally consistent if a_j is defined as the full envelope including T_j, since the transverse factors then drop from each normalized equation under the stated assumptions ∂_{x,t}T=0 and ∇⊥²A∥=0. The load-bearing issue is the physical assumption itself: no condition is given under which T_j remains frozen for arbitrary structured beams. For a finite-size Gaussian pump that is not transversely flat over the seed, the local growth rate in Eqs. (9)-(11) depends on the local pump amplitude, so the seed transverse profile will be distorted. The simulations use super-Gaussian or very broad pumps, but the theory as written applies to any pump. The paper should state and quantify the required conditions (pump flatness over the seed, propagation length much smaller than the relevant diffraction or acceleration length) and adjust the 'independent of T' claim accordingly.
  2. [Abstract and Section 3.1] The output duration claim is internally inconsistent. The LG seed is compressed from 90 fs to 10 fs at λ1=1.8 µm, which is approximately 1.7 optical cycles (one cycle is about 6 fs), not a sub-cycle pulse as stated in the abstract. The conclusion says 'nearly a single optical cycle', which is more accurate. Please characterize the output duration in optical cycles consistently for each case, and support the 'sub-cycle' statement for the Airy case with the actual duration value.
  3. [Section 3.3 and Section 5] For Airy beams, the accelerating transverse trajectory implies ∂_xT≠0 over sufficiently long propagation, which the paper acknowledges only by saying that amplification works within limited spatial and temporal scales. Since the analytical model assumes ∂_{x,t}T=0, the manuscript should provide an estimate of the maximum interaction length over which the Airy transverse shift, Δy ≈ x²/(4k²y0³), is negligible, and state explicitly that the 'universal' claim is limited to that range. Without such a bound, the analytical model's applicability to Airy beams is not established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eqs. (16)-(17)] The notation a00 is used both for the initial pump amplitude in Eqs. (12)-(13) and for the vector pump amplitude in the OAM analysis; please disambiguate these symbols.
  2. [Table 1] The column headed 'r (µm)' is not defined in the caption; please specify what r represents, for example the output spot size or the interaction transverse scale.
  3. [Fig. 6] The phrase 'insert plot' should be 'inset plot'.
  4. [Section 2] The derivation states linear polarization but later treats circularly polarized pumps; please clarify that the vector-component formulation covers both cases.
  5. [Section 3] The manuscript does not report numerical parameters such as cell size, particles per cell, or convergence checks for the PIC runs; a brief statement would help support the quantitative intensity and duration claims.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Section 2 T-factor cancellation is algebraically valid under the stated approximations, and the self-cited scaling laws are parameter-free and further verified by the paper's PIC simulations.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. In Section 2, the paper decomposes the envelopes as A'_j = A∥,j T_j and assumes ∂_{x,t}T = 0, paraxial transverse profiles, and ∇⊥²A∥ = 0. Because the normalized variables are defined from the full envelopes via A'_j = (m_e c^2/2e) a_j, the transverse factors T_j commute with the one-dimensional envelope operators and cancel algebraically, so Eqs. (9)–(11) are genuinely independent of the transverse profile under the stated conditions. This resolves the concern that T_1 T_2/T_0 must separately cancel: the normalization absorbs the full transverse envelope, not just the longitudinal part. The analytical scaling relations (12) and (13) are quoted from the authors' prior PRL [50], but they are closed-form, parameter-free solutions of the standard three-wave system, published independently and not fitted to the present data; moreover, the present 2D/3D PIC simulations with the EPOCH code independently corroborate those scaling laws in Fig. 6. The OAM phase-matching and new-mode analysis (Eqs. 15–17) is derived analytically and then checked against PIC results, not assumed. The Airy-beam limitation regarding the curved trajectory and finite interaction length is explicitly acknowledged in Sec. 3.3. No fitted input is relabeled as a prediction, and the self-citation to Ref. [50] is load-bearing only in the sense of using a previously established, externally validated result. Therefore no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on the 1D three-wave coupling model and the assumption that transverse beam profiles do not evolve. No free parameters are fitted; simulation parameters are design choices. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Paraxial approximation is valid for the pump and seed beams during FRA.
    Used in Section 2 to simplify the three-wave coupling equations; requires propagation distance much less than the Rayleigh length.
  • ad hoc to paper Transverse envelopes of pump and seed beams are unchanged during propagation (∂_x,t T = 0).
    This is the key assumption that reduces the 3D equations to the 1D FRA model, making the scheme appear universal. It is stated in Section 2 and challenged by beams like Airy that have moving intensity peaks.
  • domain assumption Cold plasma and homogeneous plasma density.
    The plasma is treated as cold and uniform in the theoretical model, and the simulations use a uniform slab. Real plasmas have temperature and density gradients that could affect the process.
  • standard math The three-wave coupling model for forward Raman scattering is applicable.
    Standard model in plasma physics, used in Section 2 to derive the coupled equations (Eqs. 9-11).
  • standard math The analytical growth and scaling laws from the authors' previous PRL [50] are valid.
    Eq. (12) and Eq. (13) are taken from prior work and applied directly to structured beams. They are assumed to hold under the same conditions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generation of high power spatially-structured laser pulses via forward Raman amplification in plasma." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AA4HSNL3

@misc{pith2026250621979,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generation of high power spatially-structured laser pulses via forward Raman amplification in plasma},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AA4HSNL3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.21979}
}
read the original abstract

Spatially-structured light with tunable intensity, wavelength, and spatiotemporal profiles has demonstrated significant potentials for fundamental and applied science, including the ultrafast and high-field physics. Nevertheless, the generation or amplification of such light towards extremely high power remains challenging due to the limitations of conventional gain media. Building upon our recently proposed forward Raman amplification (FRA) mechanism [Lei et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 255001 (2025)], here we develop a universal plasma-based amplification scheme that is capable of generating high-power structured laser beams, including vortex, Bessel, and Airy beams. Through theoretical modeling and multi-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations, we demonstrate that a near-infrared structured seed laser with an initial intensity of 1e12 W/cm2 can achieve 1e4~1e5-fold intensity amplification via FRA, and subsequently be self-compressed to sub-cycle duration with petawatt-level peak power. Benefiting from its exceptionally high amplification growth rate, the FRA process requires only femtosecond-scale interaction time and submillimeter propagation distance in plasma, effectively suppressing concomitant plasma instabilities. The high output intensity 1e17 W/cm2, compactness (<500 um), high temporal contrast, universal applicability to diverse structured beams, and relatively easy implementation with the co-propagating configuration combine to make the FRA a disruptive approach to the generation of petawatt-class spatially-structured light, enabling unprecedented applications in high-field physics and ultrafast science.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nature 187(4736), 493–494 (1960)

    Maiman, T.H.: Stimulated optical radiation in ruby. Nature 187(4736), 493–494 (1960)

    work page 1960

  2. [2]

    Journal of Optics 19(1), 013001 (2016)

    Rubinsztein-Dunlop, H., Forbes, A., Berry, M.V., Dennis, M.R., Andrews, D.L., Mansuripur, M., Denz, C., Alpmann, C., Banzer, P., Bauer, T., et al.: Roadmap on structured light. Journal of Optics 19(1), 013001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Nature Photonics 15(4), 253–262 (2021)

    Forbes, A., De Oliveira, M., Dennis, M.R.: Structured light. Nature Photonics 15(4), 253–262 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Optica 12(6), 732–752 (2025)

    Piccardo, M., Cernaianu, M.O., Palastro, J.P., Arefiev, A., Thaury, C., Vieira, J., Froula, D.H., Malka, V.: Trends in relativistic laser–matter interaction: the promises of structured light. Optica 12(6), 732–752 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Physical Review Letters 58(15), 1499 (1987)

    Durnin, J., Miceli Jr, J., Eberly, J.H.: Diffraction-free beams. Physical Review Letters 58(15), 1499 (1987)

    work page 1987

  6. [6]

    Optics Express 16(17), 12880–12891 (2008)

    Broky, J., Siviloglou, G.A., Dogariu, A., Christodoulides, D.N.: Self-healing properties of optical airy beams. Optics Express 16(17), 12880–12891 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Optics Letters 33(3), 207–209 (2008)

    Siviloglou, G., Broky, J., Dogariu, A., Christodoulides, D.: Ballistic dynamics of airy beams. Optics Letters 33(3), 207–209 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Physical Review A 45(11), 8185 (1992)

    Allen, L., Beijersbergen, M.W., Spreeuw, R., Woerdman, J.: Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of laguerre-gaussian laser modes. Physical Review A 45(11), 8185 (1992)

    work page 1992

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Light: Science & Applications 8(1), 90 (2019)

    Shen, Y., Wang, X., Xie, Z., Min, C., Fu, X., Liu, Q., Gong, M., Yuan, X.: Opti- cal vortices 30 years on: Oam manipulation from topological charge to multiple singularities. Light: Science & Applications 8(1), 90 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Optics Express 19(10), 9714–9736 (2011) 18

    Holleczek, A., Aiello, A., Gabriel, C., Marquardt, C., Leuchs, G.: Classical and quantum properties of cylindrically polarized states of light. Optics Express 19(10), 9714–9736 (2011) 18

    2011

  3. [11]

    Journal of Optics 20(12), 123001 (2018)

    Rosales-Guzm´ an, C., Ndagano, B., Forbes, A.: A review of complex vector light fields and their applications. Journal of Optics 20(12), 123001 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Nature Photonics 6(7), 488–496 (2012)

    Wang, J., Yang, J.-Y., Fazal, I.M., Ahmed, N., Yan, Y., Huang, H., Ren, Y., Yue, Y., Dolinar, S., Tur, M., et al.: Terabit free-space data transmission employing orbital angular momentum multiplexing. Nature Photonics 6(7), 488–496 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    Science 340(6140), 1545–1548 (2013)

    Bozinovic, N., Yue, Y., Ren, Y., Tur, M., Kristensen, P., Huang, H., Willner, A.E., Ramachandran, S.: Terabit-scale orbital angular momentum mode division multiplexing in fibers. Science 340(6140), 1545–1548 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Nature Photonics 5(6), 343–348 (2011)

    Padgett, M., Bowman, R.: Tweezers with a twist. Nature Photonics 5(6), 343–348 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    Optics Express13(3), 873–881 (2005)

    Torner, L., Torres, J.P., Carrasco, S.: Digital spiral imaging. Optics Express13(3), 873–881 (2005)

    2005

  8. [16]

    Physical Review Letters 112(21), 215001 (2014)

    Vieira, J., Mendon¸ ca, J.: Nonlinear laser driven donut wakefields for positron and electron acceleration. Physical Review Letters 112(21), 215001 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Physical Review Letters 121(5), 054801 (2018)

    Vieira, J., Mendon¸ ca, J., Qu´ er´ e, F.: Optical control of the topology of laser-plasma accelerators. Physical Review Letters 121(5), 054801 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12683 (2025)

    Wang, W., Sun, X., Sun, F., Lv, Z., Glize, K., Shi, Z., Xu, Y., Zhang, Z., Wu, F., Hu, J., et al.: Enhanced proton acceleration via petawatt laguerre-gaussian lasers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12683 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Physical Review Letters 121(14), 145002 (2018)

    Shi, Y., Vieira, J., Trines, R., Bingham, R., Shen, B., Kingham, R.: Magnetic field generation in plasma waves driven by copropagating intense twisted lasers. Physical Review Letters 121(14), 145002 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    Physical Review Research 3(4), 043180 (2021)

    Longman, A., Fedosejevs, R.: Kilo-tesla axial magnetic field generation with high intensity spin and orbital angular momentum beams. Physical Review Research 3(4), 043180 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Physical Review A 103(2), 023507 (2021)

    Chen, Z.-Y., Hu, R.: Intense high-order harmonic vector beams from relativistic plasma mirrors. Physical Review A 103(2), 023507 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Physical Review Letters 114(17), 173901 (2015)

    Zhang, X., Shen, B., Shi, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, L., Wang, W., Xu, J., Yi, L., Xu, Z.: Generation of intense high-order vortex harmonics. Physical Review Letters 114(17), 173901 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Physical Review A 109(4), 043521 (2024)

    Pang, Z., Chen, P., Chen, Z.-Y.: Self-healing high-order harmonic generation from curved relativistic plasma mirrors with bessel-gaussian beams. Physical Review A 109(4), 043521 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Physical Review A 109(1), 013522 (2024) 19

    Chen, P., Pang, Z., Chen, Z.-Y.: Isolated attosecond pulses from airy-beam-driven relativistic plasma mirrors. Physical Review A 109(1), 013522 (2024) 19

    2024

  17. [25]

    Optics Communications 112(5-6), 321–327 (1994)

    Beijersbergen, M., Coerwinkel, R., Kristensen, M., Woerdman, J.: Helical- wavefront laser beams produced with a spiral phaseplate. Optics Communications 112(5-6), 321–327 (1994)

    1994

  18. [26]

    Physical Review Letters 96(16), 163905 (2006)

    Marrucci, L., Manzo, C., Paparo, D.: Optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media. Physical Review Letters 96(16), 163905 (2006)

    2006

  19. [27]

    Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 79(4), 043802 (2009)

    Kuntz, K., Braverman, B., Youn, S., Lobino, M., Pessina, E., Lvovsky, A.: Spatial and temporal characterization of a bessel beam produced using a conical mir- ror. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 79(4), 043802 (2009)

    2009

  20. [28]

    Optics Communications 55(6), 447–449 (1985)

    Strickland, D., Mourou, G.: Compression of amplified chirped optical pulses. Optics Communications 55(6), 447–449 (1985)

    1985

  21. [29]

    Optics Communications 144(1-3), 125–133 (1997)

    Ross, I., Matousek, P., Towrie, M., Langley, A., Collier, J.: The prospects for ultrashort pulse duration and ultrahigh intensity using optical parametric chirped pulse amplifiers. Optics Communications 144(1-3), 125–133 (1997)

    1997

  22. [30]

    Physical Review Letters 74(12), 2248 (1995)

    Stuart, B., Feit, M., Rubenchik, A., Shore, B., Perry, M.: Laser-induced damage in dielectrics with nanosecond to subpicosecond pulses. Physical Review Letters 74(12), 2248 (1995)

    1995

  23. [31]

    Nature Photonics 17(12), 1074– 1079 (2023)

    Hur, M.S., Ersfeld, B., Lee, H., Kim, H., Roh, K., Lee, Y., Song, H.S., Kumar, M., Yoffe, S., Jaroszynski, D.A., et al.: Laser pulse compression by a density gradient plasma for exawatt to zettawatt lasers. Nature Photonics 17(12), 1074– 1079 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Nature Photonics 12(8), 489–494 (2018)

    Nie, Z., Pai, C.-H., Hua, J., Zhang, C., Wu, Y., Wan, Y., Li, F., Zhang, J., Cheng, Z., Su, Q., et al.: Relativistic single-cycle tunable infrared pulses generated from a tailored plasma density structure. Nature Photonics 12(8), 489–494 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Light: Science & Applications 9(1), 46 (2020)

    Zhu, X.-L., Weng, S.-M., Chen, M., Sheng, Z.-M., Zhang, J.: Efficient generation of relativistic near-single-cycle mid-infrared pulses in plasmas. Light: Science & Applications 9(1), 46 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Matter and Radiation at Extremes 8(2), 043109 (2023)

    Riconda, C., Weber, S.: Plasma optics: A perspective for high-power coherent light generation and manipulation. Matter and Radiation at Extremes 8(2), 043109 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    JOSA B13(2), 459–468 (1996)

    Stuart, B.C., Feit, M.D., Herman, S., Rubenchik, A.M., Shore, B.W., Perry, M.D.: Optical ablation by high-power short-pulse lasers. JOSA B13(2), 459–468 (1996)

    1996

  28. [36]

    Physical Review Letters 82(22), 4448 (1999) 20

    Malkin, V., Shvets, G., Fisch, N.: Fast compression of laser beams to highly overcritical powers. Physical Review Letters 82(22), 4448 (1999) 20

    1999

  29. [37]

    Nature Physics 7(1), 87–92 (2011)

    Trines, R., Fiuza, F., Bingham, R., Fonseca, R., Silva, L., Cairns, R., Norreys, P.: Simulations of efficient raman amplification into the multipetawatt regime. Nature Physics 7(1), 87–92 (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    Physical Review Letters 120(2), 024801 (2018)

    Turnbull, D., Bucht, S., Davies, A., Haberberger, D., Kessler, T., Shaw, J., Froula, D.: Raman amplification with a flying focus. Physical Review Letters 120(2), 024801 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Physical Review Letters 94(4), 045003 (2005)

    Cheng, W., Avitzour, Y., Ping, Y., Suckewer, S., Fisch, N.J., Hur, M.S., Wurtele, J.S.: Reaching the nonlinear regime of raman amplification of ultrashort laser pulses. Physical Review Letters 94(4), 045003 (2005)

    2005

  32. [40]

    Nature Physics 3(10), 732–736 (2007)

    Ren, J., Cheng, W., Li, S., Suckewer, S.: A new method for generating ultraintense and ultrashort laser pulses. Nature Physics 3(10), 732–736 (2007)

    2007

  33. [41]

    Physics of Plasmas 13(5), 053110 (2006)

    Andreev, A., Riconda, C., Tikhonchuk, V., Weber, S.: Short light pulse amplifica- tion and compression by stimulated brillouin scattering in plasmas in the strong coupling regime. Physics of Plasmas 13(5), 053110 (2006)

    2006

  34. [42]

    Physics of Plasmas 20(8), 083115 (2013)

    Riconda, C., Weber, S., Lancia, L., Marques, J.-R., Mourou, G., Fuchs, J.: Spec- tral characteristics of ultra-short laser pulses in plasma amplifiers. Physics of Plasmas 20(8), 083115 (2013)

    2013

  35. [43]

    Physical Review Letters 111(5), 055004 (2013)

    Weber, S., Riconda, C., Lancia, L., Marqu` es, J.-R., Mourou, G., Fuchs, J.: Ampli- fication of ultrashort laser pulses by brillouin backscattering in plasmas. Physical Review Letters 111(5), 055004 (2013)

    2013

  36. [44]

    Physical Review Letters 116(7), 075001 (2016)

    Lancia, L., Giribono, A., Vassura, L., Chiaramello, M., Riconda, C., Weber, S., Castan, A., Chatelain, A., Frank, A., Gangolf, T., et al.: Signatures of the self- similar regime of strongly coupled stimulated brillouin scattering for efficient short laser pulse amplification. ...

    2016

  37. [45]

    Physical Review X 9(2), 021008 (2019)

    Marqu` es, J.-R., Lancia, L., Gangolf, T., Blecher, M., Bola˜ nos, S., Fuchs, J., Willi, O., Amiranoff, F., Berger, R., Chiaramello, M., et al.: Joule-level high-efficiency energy transfer to subpicosecond laser pulses by a plasma-based amplifier. Physical Review X 9(2), 021008 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    Nature Communications 7(1), 10371 (2016)

    Vieira, J., Trines, R.M., Alves, E.P., Fonseca, R., Mendon¸ ca, J., Bingham, R., Norreys, P., Silva, L.: Amplification and generation of ultra-intense twisted laser pulses via stimulated raman scattering. Nature Communications 7(1), 10371 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    Communications Physics 7(1), 18 (2024) 21

    Wu, Y., Zhang, C., Nie, Z., Sinclair, M., Farrell, A., Marsh, K.A., Alves, E.P., Tsung, F., Mori, W.B., Joshi, C.: Efficient generation and amplification of intense vortex and vector laser pulses via strongly-coupled stimulated brillouin scattering in plasmas. Communications P...

    2024

  40. [48]

    Scientific Reports 10(1), 19875 (2020)

    Trines, R.M., Alves, E., Webb, E., Vieira, J., Fi´ uza, F., Fonseca, R., Silva, L., Cairns, R.A., Bingham, R.: New criteria for efficient raman and brillouin amplification of laser beams in plasma. Scientific Reports 10(1), 19875 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 67(9), 295201 (2024)

    Shi, Y., Zhang, X., Arefiev, A., Shen, B.: Advances in laser-plasma interactions using intense vortex laser beams. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 67(9), 295201 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Physical Review Letters 134, 255001 (2025)

    Lei, Z.-Y., Sheng, Z.-M., Weng, S.-M., Chen, M., Zhang, J.: Towards the generation of petawatt near-infrared few-cycle light pulses via forward raman amplification in plasma. Physical Review Letters 134, 255001 (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 57(11), 113001 (2015)

    Arber, T., Bennett, K., Brady, C., Lawrence-Douglas, A., Ramsay, M., Sircombe, N.J., Gillies, P., Evans, R., Schmitz, H., Bell, A.,et al.: Contemporary particle-in- cell approach to laser-plasma modelling. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 57(11), 113001 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    Physics of Plasmas 25(4), 043109 (2018)

    Li, Z., Peng, H., Zuo, Y., Su, J., Yang, S.: The focusing effect in backward raman amplification in plasma. Physics of Plasmas 25(4), 043109 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Physical Review E 94(3), 033202 (2016)

    Ju, L., Huang, T., Xiao, K., Wu, G., Yang, S., Li, R., Yang, Y., Long, T., Zhang, H., Wu, S., et al.: Controlling multiple filaments by relativistic optical vortex beams in plasmas. Physical Review E 94(3), 033202 (2016)

    2016

  46. [54]

    Optics Communications 64(6), 491–495 (1987)

    Gori, F., Guattari, G., Padovani, C.: Bessel-gauss beams. Optics Communications 64(6), 491–495 (1987)

    1987

  47. [55]

    Optics Letters 32(8), 979–981 (2007) 22

    Siviloglou, G.A., Christodoulides, D.N.: Accelerating finite energy airy beams. Optics Letters 32(8), 979–981 (2007) 22

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.