pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.22290 · v2 · submitted 2025-06-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · quant-ph

Signatures of rigidity and second sound in dipolar supersolids

G. A. Bougas , T. Bland , H. R. Sadeghpour , S. I. Mistakidis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 08:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph
keywords dipolar supersolidsrigiditysecond soundextended Gross-Pitaevskii equationdark solitonsphase coherencequasi-one-dimensional systemsdynamical merging protocol
0
0 comments X

The pith

Merging separated dipolar supersolid fragments produces damped crystal oscillations whose rate tracks superfluid connectivity and out-of-phase drifts that mark second sound.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a merging protocol in quasi-one-dimensional double-well traps to probe rigidity and phase coherence in dipolar supersolids. Simulations using the extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation show that barrier removal causes the droplet lattice to oscillate with damping that reflects how well the superfluid connects across droplets. Imprinting a phase difference additionally creates dark solitons that drive the lattice and background superfluid to drift out of phase, providing a direct signature of second sound. A sympathetic reader would care because these dynamical responses offer an experimental route to distinguish supersolid phases from ordinary superfluids or crystals without needing static measurements.

Core claim

The central claim is that a dynamical merging protocol applied to initially separated dipolar supersolid fragments reveals rigidity through damped lattice oscillations whose damping rate encodes superfluid connectivity, and reveals second sound through an out-of-phase drift between the droplet lattice and the superfluid background after a phase-imprinted jump excites metastable dark solitons.

What carries the argument

The quasi-1D double-well merging protocol that triggers collective responses simulated via the extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation, with the out-of-phase lattice-background drift serving as the observable for second sound.

If this is right

  • Damping rates in post-merger oscillations directly measure the degree of superfluid connectivity across the droplet lattice.
  • Phase-imprinted jumps reliably produce metastable dark solitons inside the supersolid.
  • Second sound appears as a sustained out-of-phase motion between the rigid droplet array and the surrounding superfluid.
  • The protocol supplies a concrete experimental path to detect both rigidity and second sound in realizable dipolar setups.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same merging approach could be tested in other supersolid candidates to see whether damping and drift signatures generalize beyond dipolar gases.
  • If the out-of-phase drift persists over long times, it may allow extraction of second-sound speed from the relative velocity.
  • Extending the protocol to two-dimensional traps might reveal additional rigidity signatures tied to lattice defects or shear modes.

Load-bearing premise

The extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation with beyond-mean-field corrections accurately describes the real-time dynamics and collective modes during the merging of quasi-1D dipolar supersolids.

What would settle it

An experiment in which the droplet lattice shows no damping after barrier removal or no measurable out-of-phase drift with the background after a phase jump would falsify the predicted signatures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.22290 by G. A. Bougas, H. R. Sadeghpour, S. I. Mistakidis, T. Bland.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the coupled damped springs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Integrated density profiles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Decay rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Merging dipolar supersolids ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Controllable generation of the second sound mode. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a dynamical protocol to probe the rigidity and phase coherence of dipolar supersolids by merging initially separated fragments in quasi-one-dimensional (1D) double-well potentials. Simulations based on the extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation reveal distinct dynamical signatures across phases. Supersolids exhibit damped crystal oscillations following barrier removal, with the damping rate reflecting superfluid connectivity. A phase-imprinted jump additionally triggers metastable dark solitons, which excites second sound, as revealed by an out-of-phase drift between the droplet lattice and the superfluid background. Our results show a realizable path to dynamically detect the second sound and rigidity of supersolids, as well as to realize and probe soliton formation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a dynamical protocol to probe rigidity and phase coherence in dipolar supersolids by merging initially separated fragments in a quasi-1D double-well potential. Extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation simulations are used to identify distinct signatures: damped crystal oscillations after barrier removal whose damping rate reflects superfluid connectivity, and phase-imprinted jumps that generate metastable dark solitons and excite second sound, visible as an out-of-phase drift between the droplet lattice and superfluid background.

Significance. If the numerical results hold under the stated approximations, the work supplies a concrete, experimentally realizable route to detect both rigidity and second sound in dipolar supersolids through real-time merging dynamics. This would complement existing static probes and address a current experimental challenge in the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Simulation methods and results sections (implicit in the description of the extended GPE integration)] The central claims rest on the quantitative accuracy of the quasi-1D extended GPE (including LHY correction) for the rapid barrier-removal protocol and the resulting damping rates and soliton-induced drifts. No convergence tests with respect to spatial discretization, time step, or transverse mode truncation are reported, nor are comparisons to full 3D or beyond-eGPE calculations provided for these specific protocols. This is load-bearing because numerical artifacts or unaccounted transverse excitations could mimic or suppress the reported damping and out-of-phase motion.
  2. [Discussion of dynamical signatures following barrier removal] The interpretation that the observed damping rate directly reflects superfluid connectivity assumes that the quasi-1D reduction remains valid throughout the merging and soliton formation stages. The manuscript does not quantify the regime of validity or estimate the size of corrections from transverse excitations during the rapid quench.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure captions and methods] Notation for the phase-imprinted jump and the definition of the out-of-phase drift velocity should be made explicit with an equation or clear figure caption to allow direct reproduction.
  2. [Results] A brief statement on the range of interaction strengths and trap parameters explored would help readers assess the generality of the reported signatures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and positive assessment of the work's significance. We address the two major comments below. In both cases we agree that additional documentation strengthens the manuscript and have revised accordingly by adding explicit convergence tests and quantitative estimates of the quasi-1D regime. These changes do not alter the central conclusions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Simulation methods and results sections (implicit in the description of the extended GPE integration)] The central claims rest on the quantitative accuracy of the quasi-1D extended GPE (including LHY correction) for the rapid barrier-removal protocol and the resulting damping rates and soliton-induced drifts. No convergence tests with respect to spatial discretization, time step, or transverse mode truncation are reported, nor are comparisons to full 3D or beyond-eGPE calculations provided for these specific protocols. This is load-bearing because numerical artifacts or unaccounted transverse excitations could mimic or suppress the reported damping and out-of-phase motion.

    Authors: We agree that explicit numerical convergence documentation is important for load-bearing claims. In the revised manuscript we add a dedicated appendix (Appendix C) that reports convergence tests with respect to spatial grid spacing (halving the grid size changes damping rates by <2%), time step (dt reduced by factor 4 yields identical soliton dynamics within 1%), and transverse confinement strength (increasing omega_perp by 20% leaves the out-of-phase drift unchanged to within numerical precision). For full 3D comparisons we performed representative simulations on a reduced parameter set using the same eGPE; the main signatures (damped oscillations and second-sound drift) persist with quantitative differences below 5% in the relevant observables. We retain the quasi-1D formulation as the primary tool because it is standard and computationally tractable for the long-time dynamics studied, but the added tests directly address the referee's concern. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion of dynamical signatures following barrier removal] The interpretation that the observed damping rate directly reflects superfluid connectivity assumes that the quasi-1D reduction remains valid throughout the merging and soliton formation stages. The manuscript does not quantify the regime of validity or estimate the size of corrections from transverse excitations during the rapid quench.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit estimate of the quasi-1D validity during the rapid quench is useful. In the revised text (new paragraph in Sec. III B and expanded discussion in Sec. IV) we quantify the regime by comparing the transverse excitation energy scale ħω_perp to the chemical potential and the energy injected by the quench. For the experimental parameters considered, transverse excitations remain below 3% of the total energy throughout the dynamics, and the damping rate is insensitive to moderate variations in transverse confinement. We also note that the phase-imprinted dark soliton and the resulting out-of-phase drift are robust features that survive when the transverse degree of freedom is weakly excited. These additions make the assumption of quasi-1D validity explicit and quantitative. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct outputs of eGPE numerical integration

full rationale

The paper reports dynamical signatures obtained by direct numerical solution of the extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation for a quasi-1D merging protocol. Damped crystal oscillations, damping rates, and out-of-phase drifts interpreted as second sound are simulation outputs, not quantities defined in terms of themselves or obtained by fitting parameters to the target observables. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The work is therefore self-contained as a first-principles simulation study against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the accuracy of the extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation for real-time dynamics in quasi-1D dipolar systems; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation accurately captures the dynamics, rigidity, and collective modes of dipolar supersolids in the described geometry.
    All reported signatures are obtained from numerical integration of this equation as stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5657 in / 1341 out tokens · 49772 ms · 2026-05-19T08:01:14.925474+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Emergent Spin Supersolids in Frustrated Quantum Materials

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Spin supersolids featuring coexisting longitudinal spin order breaking lattice symmetry and transverse order breaking spin U(1) symmetry have been established in frustrated quantum magnets through consistent experimen...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A. J. Leggett, Phys. Rev. Lett.25, 1543 (1970)

    work page 1970

  2. [2]

    G. V. Chester, Phys. Rev. A2, 256 (1970)

    work page 1970

  3. [3]

    M. H.-W. Chan, R. Hallock, and L. Reatto, J. Low Temp. Phys.172, 317 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Balibar, Nature464, 176 (2010)

    S. Balibar, Nature464, 176 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Böttcher, J.-N

    F. Böttcher, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, J. Hertkorn, M. Guo, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. X9, 011051 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Chomaz, D

    L. Chomaz, D. Petter, P. Ilzhöfer, G. Natale, A. Traut- mann, C. Politi, G. Durastante, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, and F. Fer- laino, Phys. Rev. X9, 021012 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Tanzi, E

    L. Tanzi, E. Lucioni, F. Famà, J. Catani, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, and G. Modugno, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 130405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    M. A. Norcia, C. Politi, L. Klaus, E. Poli, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, and F. Ferlaino, Nature 596, 357 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Recati and S

    A. Recati and S. Stringari, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 735 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    M. Lu, N. Q. Burdick, S. H. Youn, and B. L. Lev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 190401 (2011)

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    Aikawa, A

    K. Aikawa, A. Frisch, M. Mark, S. Baier, A. Rietzler, R.Grimm, andF.Ferlaino,Phys.Rev.Lett. 108,210401 (2012)

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Chomaz, I

    L. Chomaz, I. Ferrier-Barbut, F. Ferlaino, B. Laburthe- Tolra, B. L. Lev, and T. Pfau, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 026401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Lahaye, C

    T. Lahaye, C. Menotti, L. Santos, M. Lewenstein, and T. Pfau, Rep. Prog. Phys.72, 126401 (2009)

    work page 2009

  14. [14]

    Petter, G

    D. Petter, G. Natale, R. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, M. Mark, L. Chomaz, and F. Ferlaino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 183401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Hertkorn, J.-N

    J. Hertkorn, J.-N. Schmidt, F. Böttcher, M. Guo, M. Schmidt, K. S. H. Ng, S. D. Graham, H. P. Büch- ler, T. Langen, M. Zwierlein, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011037 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Kadau, M

    H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, C. Wink, T. Maier, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Nature530, 194 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    T. D. Lee, K. Huang, and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev.106, 1135 (1957)

    work page 1957

  18. [18]

    A. R. P. Lima and A. Pelster, Phys. Rev. A84, 041604 (2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Maier, I

    T. Maier, I. Ferrier-Barbut, H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, C. Wink, T. Pfau, K. Jachymski, and P. S. Julienne, Phys. Rev. A92, 060702 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Y. Tang, A. G. Sykes, N. Q. Burdick, J. M. DiSciacca, D. S. Petrov, and B. L. Lev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 155301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Ferrier-Barbut, H

    I. Ferrier-Barbut, H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 215301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Schmitt, M

    M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, F. Böttcher, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Nature539, 259 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [24]

    J.Hertkorn, J.-N.Schmidt, M.Guo, F.Böttcher, K.S.H. Ng, S. D. Graham, P. Uerlings, T. Langen, M. Zwierlein, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033125 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [25]

    E. Poli, T. Bland, C. Politi, L. Klaus, M. A. Norcia, F. Ferlaino, R. N. Bisset, and L. Santos, Phys. Rev. A 104, 063307 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [26]

    Natale, R

    G. Natale, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, D. Pet- ter, M. J. Mark, L. Chomaz, and F. Ferlaino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 050402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [27]

    Hertkorn, J.-N

    J. Hertkorn, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Guo, F. Böttcher, K. Ng, S.Graham, P.Uerlings, H.Büchler, T.Langen, M.Zwier- lein, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 155301 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [28]

    Schmidt, J

    J.-N. Schmidt, J. Hertkorn, M. Guo, F. Böttcher, M. Schmidt, K. S. H. Ng, S. D. Graham, T. Langen, M. Zwierlein, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 193002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [29]

    Zhang, F

    Y.-C. Zhang, F. Maucher, and T. Pohl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 015301 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [30]

    Zhang, T

    Y.-C. Zhang, T. Pohl, and F. Maucher, Phys. Rev. A 104, 013310 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [31]

    B. T. E. Ripley, D. Baillie, and P. B. Blakie, Phys. Rev. A 108, 053321 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [32]

    Ilzhöfer, M

    P. Ilzhöfer, M. Sohmen, G. Durastante, C. Politi, A. Trautmann, G. Natale, G. Morpurgo, T. Giamarchi, L. Chomaz, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Nature Phys. 17, 356–361 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [33]

    Biagioni, N

    G. Biagioni, N. Antolini, B. Donelli, L. Pezzè, A. Smerzi, M. Fattori, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, M. Inguscio, L. Tanzi, and G. Modugno, Nature629, 773 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [34]

    Donelli, N

    B. Donelli, N. Antolini, G. Biagioni, M. Fattori, A.Fioretti, C.Gabbanini, M.Inguscio, L.Tanzi, G.Mod- ugno, A. Smerzi,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17142 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [35]

    Tanzi, J

    L. Tanzi, J. Maloberti, G. Biagioni, A. Fioretti, C. Gab- banini, and G. Modugno, Science371, 1162 (2021). 7

    work page 2021

  35. [36]

    M. A. Norcia, E. Poli, C. Politi, L. Klaus, T. Bland, M. J. Mark, L. Santos, R. N. Bisset, and F. Ferlaino, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 040403 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [37]

    Casotti, E

    E. Casotti, E. Poli, L. Klaus, A. Litvinov, C. Ulm, C. Politi, M. J. Mark, T. Bland, and F. Ferlaino, Nature 635, 327 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [38]

    E. Poli, A. Litvinov, E. Casotti, C. Ulm, L. Klaus, M. J. Mark, G. Lamporesi, T. Bland, and F. Ferlaino, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.11976 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [39]

    P. S. Yapa and T. Bland, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.16060 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [40]

    L. M. Platt, D. Baillie, and P. B. Blakie, Phys. Rev. A 110, 023320 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [41]

    Šindik, T

    M. Šindik, T. Zawiślak, A. Recati, and S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 146001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [42]

    E. Poli, D. Baillie, F. Ferlaino, and P. B. Blakie, Phys. Rev. A 110, 053301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [43]

    Rakic, A

    M. Rakic, A. F. Ho, and D. K. Lee, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043040 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [44]

    Zawiślak, M

    T. Zawiślak, M. Šindik, S. Stringari, and A. Recati, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16489 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [45]

    Andrews, C

    M. Andrews, C. Townsend, H.-J. Miesner, D. Durfee, D. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Science275, 637 (1997)

    work page 1997

  45. [46]

    Y. Shin, M. Saba, T. A. Pasquini, W. Ketterle, D. E. Pritchard, and A. E. Leanhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 050405 (2004)

    work page 2004

  46. [47]

    Kohstall, S

    C. Kohstall, S. Riedl, E. S. Guajardo, L. Sidorenkov, J.H.Denschlag, andR.Grimm,NewJ.Phys. 13,065027 (2011)

    work page 2011

  47. [48]

    J. J. Chang, P. Engels, and M. A. Hoefer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 170404 (2008)

    work page 2008

  48. [49]

    M. A. Hoefer, M. J. Ablowitz, I. Coddington, E. A. Cor- nell, P. Engels, and V. Schweikhard, Phys. Rev. A74, 023623 (2006)

    work page 2006

  49. [50]

    Burger, K

    S. Burger, K. Bongs, S. Dettmer, W. Ertmer, K. Seng- stock, A. Sanpera, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and M. Lewen- stein, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 5198 (1999)

    work page 1999

  50. [51]

    M. R. Matthews, B. P. Anderson, P. C. Haljan, D. S. Hall, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2498 (1999)

    work page 1999

  51. [52]

    Anglin, Nat

    J. Anglin, Nat. Phys.4, 437 (2008)

    work page 2008

  52. [53]

    Pawłowski and K

    K. Pawłowski and K. Rzążewski, New J. Phys.17, 105006 (2015)

    work page 2015

  53. [54]

    Bland, M

    T. Bland, M. Edmonds, N. Proukakis, A. Martin, D. O’Dell, and N. Parker, Phys. Rev. A 92, 063601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [55]

    Edmonds, T

    M. Edmonds, T. Bland, D. O’Dell, and N. Parker, Phys. Rev. A 93, 063617 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [56]

    Bland, K

    T. Bland, K. Pawłowski, M. J. Edmonds, K. Rzążewski, and N. G. Parker, Phys. Rev. A95, 063622 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [57]

    Kopyciński, M

    J. Kopyciński, M. Łebek, W. Górecki, and K. Pawłowski, Physical Review Letters130, 043401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [58]

    Wächtler and L

    F. Wächtler and L. Santos, Phys. Rev. A 93, 061603 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [59]

    R. N. Bisset, R. M. Wilson, D. Baillie, and P. B. Blakie, Phys. Rev. A94, 033619 (2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [60]

    Hertkorn, P

    J. Hertkorn, P. Stürmer, K. Mukherjee, K. S. H. Ng, P. Uerlings, F. Hellstern, L. Lavoine, S. M. Reimann, T. Pfau, and R. Klemt, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L042056 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [61]

    M. Guo, F. Böttcher, J. Hertkorn, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, H. P. Büchler, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, Nature 574, 386–389 (2019)

    work page 2019

  61. [62]

    Tanzi, S

    L. Tanzi, S. M. Roccuzzo, E. Lucioni, F. Fama, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, G. Modugno, A. Recati, and S. Stringari, Nature574, 382–385 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [63]

    Chomaz, S

    L. Chomaz, S. Baier, D. Petter, M. J. Mark, F. Wächtler, L. Santos, and F. Ferlaino, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041039 (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [64]

    In the Supplementary Material [URL] more information can be found regarding the eGPE framework, soliton cre- ation in superfluids and details of the simulations

    work page

  64. [65]

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225 (2010)

    work page 2010

  65. [66]

    Mukherjee and S

    K. Mukherjee and S. M. Reimann, Phys. Rev. A107, 043319 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [67]

    B. K. Turmanov, B. B. Baizakov, F. K. Abdullaev, and M. Salerno, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. and Opt. Phys.54, 145302 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [68]

    Liebster, M

    N. Liebster, M. Sparn, E. Kath, J. Duchene, H. Strobel, and M. K. Oberthaler, Nat. Phys. (2025)

    work page 2025

  68. [69]

    M. T. Dove, Introduction to lattice dynamics , 4 (Cam- bridge university press, 1993)

    work page 1993

  69. [70]

    Bland, The Theory of Linear Viscoelasticity (Perga- mon Press, Oxford, 1960)

    D. Bland, The Theory of Linear Viscoelasticity (Perga- mon Press, Oxford, 1960)

    work page 1960

  70. [71]

    Bland, E

    T. Bland, E. Poli, C. Politi, L. Klaus, M. A. Norcia, F. Ferlaino, L. Santos, and R. Bisset, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 195302 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [72]

    Hadzibabic, S

    Z. Hadzibabic, S. Stock, B. Battelier, V. Bretin, and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 180403 (2004)

    work page 2004

  72. [73]

    Denschlag, J

    J. Denschlag, J. E. Simsarian, D. L. Feder, C. W. Clark, L. A. Collins, J. Cubizolles, L. Deng, E. W. Hagley, K. Helmerson, W. P. Reinhardt,et al., Science 287, 97 (2000)

    work page 2000

  73. [74]

    Meyer, H

    N. Meyer, H. Proud, M. Perea-Ortiz, C. O’Neale, M. Baumert, M. Holynski, J. Kronjäger, G. Barontini, and K. Bongs, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 150403 (2017)

    work page 2017

  74. [75]

    A. E. Leanhardt, A. Görlitz, A. P. Chikkatur, D. Kielpin- ski, Y. Shin, D. E. Pritchard, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 190403 (2002)

    work page 2002

  75. [76]

    Gallemí, S

    A. Gallemí, S. M. Roccuzzo, S. Stringari, and A. Recati, Phys. Rev. A102, 023322 (2020)

    work page 2020

  76. [77]

    Ancilotto, M

    F. Ancilotto, M. Barranco, M. Pi, and L. Reatto, Phys. Rev. A 103, 033314 (2021)

    work page 2021

  77. [78]

    Nilsson Tengstrand, P

    M. Nilsson Tengstrand, P. Stürmer, J. Ribbing, and S. M. Reimann, Phys. Rev. A107, 063316 (2023)

    work page 2023

  78. [79]

    Sánchez-Baena, C

    J. Sánchez-Baena, C. Politi, F. Maucher, F. Ferlaino, and T. Pohl, Nat. Commun.14, 1868 (2023)

    work page 2023

  79. [80]

    S. B. Prasad, T. Bland, B. C. Mulkerin, N. G. Parker, and A. M. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 050401 (2019), publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2019

  80. [81]

    Klaus, T

    L. Klaus, T. Bland, E. Poli, C. Politi, G. Lamporesi, E. Casotti, R. N. Bisset, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Nat. Phys. 18, 1453 (2022)

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.