Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 6 cited by

Modeling the Cosmological Lyman-$\alpha$ Forest at the Field Level

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An analytic, perturbative forward model predicts the Lyman-alpha forest flux fluctuation field from cosmological initial conditions, and reproduces simulated flux statistics at the percent level down to scales of a few megaparsecs.

desk verdict A well-executed first field-level EFT forward model for the Ly-alpha forest, with percent-level in-sample accuracy; the missing out-of-sample test is the main thing separating a proof-of-concept from a predictive tool. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00284 v1 pith:EWH5SMMH submitted 2025-06-30 astro-ph.CO

Roger de Belsunce , Mikhail M. Ivanov , James M. Sullivan , Kazuyuki Akitsu , Shi-Fan Chen This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords Lyman-alphaforestfield-levelinferenceeffectivefieldtheoryforwardmodelintergalacticmediumlarge-scalestructuretransmittedfluxfluctuationsstochasticnoisepowerspectrum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Cosmological analyses of the Lyman-alpha forest currently compress quasar spectra into two-point statistics, throwing away phase information. This paper develops an analytic, perturbative forward model that predicts the whole transmitted-flux fluctuation field from a specified set of initial conditions, so that every Fourier mode's amplitude and phase can be compared. Calibrated on one hydrodynamic simulation snapshot and evaluated on the same initial conditions, the model reproduces the flux power spectrum, the flux-halo cross-spectrum, and count-in-cell statistics at the percent level down to scales of a few megaparsecs. The payoff is that Lyman-alpha data from current and planned surveys could be analyzed at the field level, with simulation-based priors, rather than through lossy summary statistics.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the effective-field-theory bias expansion for the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest, with each bias parameter promoted to a momentum-dependent transfer function $\beta_O(k,\mu)$ fitted by cross-correlating the simulated flux with each operator. The operator set includes the linear matter density, the line-of-sight velocity gradient $\eta = \partial_\parallel v_\parallel/(aH)$, quadratic density and velocity terms, and additional line-of-sight operators such as $\eta^2$ and $(KK)_\parallel$; operators are orthogonalized so each transfer function is independent, and all operators are shifted by first-order Lagrangian displacements to resum long-wavelength motions. The diagnostic is the error power spectrum $P_{\rm err}(k,\mu) = \langle |\delta_F^{\rm truth} - \delta_F^{\rm model}|^2\rangle$, which the effective field theory predicts to be white with small scale-dependent corrections; the paper measures the leading noise amplitude $n_0 \approx 0.18\,[h^{-1}\,{\rm Mpc}]^3$.

What would settle it

Apply the calibrated transfer functions to a second hydrodynamic simulation with different initial conditions or to a different redshift snapshot of the same simulation suite, and measure the per-mode error spectrum $P_{\rm err}(k,\mu)$; if the flat percent-level error spectrum from the calibration snapshot is not recovered, the claimed universality is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Lyman-$\alpha$ transmitted-flux fluctuation field can be predicted analytically at the field level from the initial dark matter density field, not just in its summary statistics. With an effective-field-theory bias expansion carried to cubic order, including line-of-sight dependent operators, and with each bias parameter promoted to a scale- and angle-dependent transfer function, the model matches the simulated flux field in both amplitude and phase. Concretely, the paper reports that the flux power spectrum is reproduced at the five percent level up to $k \approx 0.6\,h\,{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, the counts-in-cell distribution down to cell radii of $1{-}2\,h^{-1}\,{\rm Mpc}$, and the Lyman-$\alpha$-halo cross-spectrum up to $k \approx 1\,h\,{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$. It also provides a first estimate of the stochastic noise power spectrum of the three-dimensional flux field, finding a noise floor $n_0 \approx 0.18\,[h^{-1}\,{\rm Mpc}]^3$ that appears to be inherited from dark matter halos.

Load-bearing premise

The transfer functions calibrated on the single hydrodynamic simulation snapshot are universal, meaning the same fitted numerical coefficients apply to other initial-condition realizations and redshifts without re-fitting; the paper asserts this on effective-field-theory grounds but does not test it on an independent simulation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Lyman-alpha forest data from DESI can be analyzed by field-level inference, extracting information beyond the power spectrum without running large-volume hydrodynamic simulations.
  • Simulation-based priors for Lyman-alpha effective-field-theory parameters can be built from the analytic model, removing sample variance from parameter measurements.
  • The model can generate large-volume Lyman-alpha mocks for covariance matrices needed in joint Lyman-alpha-quasar analyses.
  • The measured stochastic noise floor sets the irreducible error budget for cosmological inference from the forest.
  • The failure of the linear bias model at the field level shows that higher-order bias operators are mandatory for any field-level analysis of the flux.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the universality claim survives an independent test, the calibrated transfer functions could be applied to initial conditions inferred from other cosmological probes, enabling a joint field-level likelihood across surveys.
  • The flattening of the noise power spectrum near $k \approx 0.6\,h\,{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ suggests the stochastic component might be absorbed by running the effective-field-theory expansion against the full nonlinear matter field from an N-body simulation; the paper flags exactly this as future work.
  • A direct extension would be to calibrate the transfer functions on simulations with different IGM thermal histories, since the current validation uses a single photoionization and temperature state.
  • The same transfer-function formalism could be adapted to Lyman-alpha tomographic maps from high-redshift galaxies, trading line-of-sight resolution for much larger survey volume.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This Letter presents an analytic, perturbative forward model for the cosmological Lyman-α forest flux-decrement field, based on an EFT bias expansion with line-of-sight operators and k- and μ-dependent transfer functions calibrated against the Sherwood hydrodynamic simulation. The model is evaluated on the same Sherwood snapshot at z=2.8 used for calibration; the authors compare power spectra, one-point PDFs and moments, and Lyα–halo cross-spectra, reporting percent-level agreement down to k ≈ 0.6 h/Mpc and claiming accurate count-in-cell statistics. They argue that the calibrated transfer functions are universal and can be applied to other initial-condition realizations, enabling field-level inference for DESI.

Significance. The paper addresses an important problem: current Lyα analyses use only two-point statistics, and a validated field-level forward model would enable optimal inference and simulation-based priors. The analytic construction is novel and the in-sample agreement is impressive; the paper also provides a first quantification of the Lyα stochastic noise power spectrum. However, because the transfer functions and noise parameters are fitted to the same snapshot used for validation, the reported accuracy is partly by construction, and the universality that would make the model predictive is asserted rather than demonstrated. With an out-of-sample test, this would be a strong contribution; without one, the central predictive claim is not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Forward model (Eqs. 5 and 10) and Results] The central predictive claim is not tested out of sample. In Eq. (5) the linear transfer function is defined as the cross-spectrum of the target field with the initial density of the same realization, and the full set of transfer functions in Eq. (10) is chosen to minimize the same-snapshot Perr; the noise parameters in Eq. (8) are then fitted to that residual. All validation figures (Figs. 1–3 and S1–S3, Tables S1–S2) use the same Sherwood snapshot. The statement that 'the universality of EFT guarantees' applicability to other realizations is an assertion, not a proof, especially since these transfer functions are non-perturbative fitted objects. The authors should demonstrate transfer-function universality on at least one independent realization, a different redshift, or a different simulation before claiming predictive field-level modeling. This is load-bearing for the abstract's claim and for the proposed DESI applications.
  2. [Model error power spectrum (Eq. 8)] The reported noise parameters n0, α1, α2 are extracted from the residual of the calibration snapshot. Because the transfer functions were chosen to minimize Perr on that same snapshot, the residual is the minimum achievable in-sample error; it is not independent evidence about the true stochasticity of the Lyα field. Calling these the 'first estimates of stochasticity' is therefore premature. A split-sample or cross-realization check is needed to determine whether the fitted noise level is physical or partly an artifact of overfitting to the phases of one realization.
  3. [Abstract, Summary, and Supplemental Table S1] The abstract and Summary claim that the model reproduces 'count-in-cell statistics at the percent level,' but the only one-point statistics shown are PDFs and moments (variance, skewness, kurtosis) of the flux field smoothed with Gaussian kernels (Fig. S1, Table S1). No count-in-cell variance or related discrete-cell statistic is presented. Either provide the actual count-in-cell measurements or revise the claim to state that the model reproduces one-point statistics of the smoothed field.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Model error power spectrum] The text says 'refereed to as the error power spectrum'; 'refereed' should be 'referred'.
  2. [Forward model] The definition δF = F/F(z) − 1 uses F(z) for both the mean transmission and the field; please use an overbar or a different symbol for the mean to avoid ambiguity.
  3. [Figures 1 and 3] Measured power spectra are shown without error bars; for a single realization, please include sample-variance estimates or state explicitly why they are omitted.
  4. [Summary] The terminology 'count-in-cell' vs 'counts-in-cells' is inconsistent between the abstract and the Summary; standardize after revising the relevant claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the field-level fit and residual diagnostics are not equivalent to the claims by construction; the untested transfer-function universality is a validation gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Eq. (5) defines the transfer function as the mean-square-minimizing ratio of cross-spectrum to auto-spectrum; this is a fitting prescription, not a prediction. The reported Perr (Eq. 6) is the residual after that optimal linear/nonlinear fit, and its smallness is a nontrivial statement about how much of the simulated field's variance and phase information is captured by the EFT operator basis. The model power spectrum, one-point PDF, and counts-in-cells are derived from the fitted field, so they are in-sample validations; but the paper does not present these as out-of-sample predictions. The out-of-sample step is the assertion that calibrated transfer functions can be applied to other realizations, and that assertion is not demonstrated: no hold-out simulation or different redshift is tested, and 'the universality of EFT guarantees' is an extrapolation rather than a derived identity. However, no equation in the paper makes a claimed result equal to its own input by construction, and no load-bearing premise reduces to a self-citation. The self-citations (e.g., [75], [81], [82]) supply standard EFT machinery, not a uniqueness theorem used to forbid alternatives. Therefore the circularity score is 0; the main risk is external validity, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model relies on the EFT bias expansion, the equivalence principle, the Sherwood simulation as truth, and the untested universality of calibrated transfer functions. No new entities are invented; the free parameters are bias and noise coefficients fitted to a single simulation snapshot.

free parameters (6)
  • linear bias parameters b1, b_eta = not reported
    Enter the bias expansion at linear order (Eq. 1) and are fit to the simulation via the transfer-function cross-spectrum (Eq. 5).
  • quadratic bias parameters b2, bG2, b(KK)_par, b_delta_eta, b_eta2, b_Pi[2]_par = not reported
    Appear in the K2 kernel (Eq. S2) and are absorbed into transfer functions in the cubic model.
  • cubic bias parameters b_Gamma3, b_delta_Pi[2]_par, b_eta_Pi[2]_par, b_(K Pi[2])_par, b_Pi[3]_par = not reported
    Cubic operators are absorbed into the linear transfer function beta1 in the forward model, per Supplemental Material.
  • transfer functions beta_F1, beta_F_eta, beta_F2, beta_FG2, beta_F_delta_eta, beta_F_eta2, beta_F_KK_par = not reported; binned in k and mu
    The central calibration objects; determined by cross-spectra with the target field (Eq. 10 and Eq. 5 analog). This is the main fit.
  • noise EFT parameters n0, alpha1, alpha2 = n0 ~ 0.18 [h^-1 Mpc]^3, alpha1 ~ -0.25 [h^-1 Mpc]^2, alpha2 ~ 0.51 [h^-1 Mpc]^2
    Fitted to the residual error power spectrum Perr(k, mu) in the Model error power spectrum section.
  • halo bias parameters from Ref. [75] = not reported
    Used for the halo auto and cross-spectra in Fig. 3; calibrated to the Sherwood halo catalog.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Ly-alpha flux is a biased tracer of the dark matter field, describable by a local EFT bias expansion.
    Used in Eq. (9) and the Forward model section; basis of the entire model. This is an assumption about IGM physics, not proven from first principles.
  • domain assumption Equivalence principle: on large scales flux fluctuations trace matter overdensity and line-of-sight velocity gradient.
    Eq. (1); standard for EFT of large-scale structure, but an assumption for Ly-alpha gas.
  • domain assumption Transfer functions calibrated on one Sherwood realization are universal and apply to other initial conditions.
    Explicitly assumed in the Forward model section: 'Once the transfer functions are calibrated, they can be applied to other realizations.' Never tested.
  • domain assumption The Sherwood hydrodynamic simulation is an accurate representation of the Ly-alpha forest at z=2.8.
    The simulation is treated as 'truth' throughout; its subgrid IGM physics is not independently validated here.
  • domain assumption Initial conditions are Gaussian, generated with N-GenIC from Planck 2013 cosmology.
    Used to generate delta1 for both the model and simulation; no non-Gaussianity or beyond-Planck parameters considered.
  • standard math Standard perturbation theory kernels F2, G2 and IR-resummed Zel'dovich displacements correctly describe nonlinear evolution at the scales considered.
    Used in Eq. (S2)-(S5); standard results from [121] and IR resummation literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modeling the Cosmological Lyman-$\alpha$ Forest at the Field Level." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EWH5SMMH

@misc{pith2026250700284,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modeling the Cosmological Lyman-$\alpha$ Forest at the Field Level},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EWH5SMMH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00284}
}
abstract

The distribution of absorption lines in the spectra of distant quasars, called the Lyman-$\alpha$ (Ly-$\alpha$) forest, is a unique probe of cosmology and the intergalactic medium at high redshifts and small scales. The statistical power of ongoing redshift surveys demands precise theoretical tools to model the Ly-$\alpha$ forest. We address this challenge by developing an analytic, perturbative forward model to predict the Ly-$\alpha$ forest at the field level for a given set of cosmological initial conditions. Our model shows a remarkable performance when compared with the Sherwood hydrodynamic simulations: it reproduces the flux distribution, the Ly-$\alpha$ - dark matter halo cross-correlations, and the count-in-cell statistics at the percent level down to scales of a few Mpc. Our work provides crucial tools that bridge analytic modeling on large scales with simulations on small-scales, enabling field-level inference from Ly-$\alpha$ forest data and simulation-based priors for cosmological analyses. This is especially timely for realizing the full scientific potential of the Ly-$\alpha$ forest measurements by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00284 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Comparison between the measured two-dimensional power spectrum from the Sherwood simulation (black) and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Comparison of the halo auto-power spectrum ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Galaxy Power Spectrum at Two-Loop Order: Implications for Weak Lensing Surveys and New Physics

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Two-loop EFT galaxy power spectrum achieves per-mille agreement with simulations to k=0.85 h/Mpc and yields three times narrower unbiased σ8 errors than linear theory.

  2. Lyman-Alpha Forest and its Cross-Correlation with High-Redshift Galaxies in Effective Field Theory at the Field Level

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    An EFT-based field-level forward model for the Lyman-alpha forest matches simulations at the percent level on quasi-linear scales and generates mocks for DESI and DESI-II analyses.

  3. Bridging Simulations and EFT: A Hybrid Model of the Lyman-Alpha Forest Field

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hybrid EFT forward model using N-body displacements reproduces the simulated Lyman-alpha forest to 5% at k <= 1 h/Mpc with a white-noise residual.

  4. The Compressed 3D Lyman-Alpha Forest Bispectrum

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The Lyman-alpha forest bispectrum can be compressed into 26 skew spectra, including a new shifted variant, with tree-level EFT predictions matching simulations at 1-2 sigma up to k≈0.17 h/Mpc.

  5. An AI super-resolution field emulator for cosmological hydrodynamics: the Lyman-{\alpha} forest

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A two-stage deep learning emulator reproduces high-resolution baryonic fields and Lyman-alpha flux statistics from low-resolution hydrodynamic simulations, with a 450x speedup.

  6. GGI Lectures on Large-Scale Structure Perturbation Theory (Effective Field Theory)

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

    Pedagogical notes derive large-scale-structure EFT from symmetries, covering SPT failures, BAO IR resummation, counterterms, galaxy bias, redshift-space distortions, and Lagrangian PT.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 111 linked inside Pith · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    McQuinn, The Evolution of the Intergalactic Medium, ARA&A 54 (2016) 313 [ 1512.00086]

    M. McQuinn, The Evolution of the Intergalactic Medium, ARA&A 54 (2016) 313 [ 1512.00086]

    arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Seljak, A

    U. Seljak, A. Makarov, P. McDonald, S. F. Anderson, N. A. Bahcall, J. Brinkmann et al., Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Ly α forest and galaxy bias: Constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neutrino mass, and dark energy , Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 103515 [ astro-ph/0407372]

    arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    M. Viel, J. Lesgourgues, M. G. Haehnelt, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto, Constraining warm dark matter candidates including sterile neutrinos and light gravitinos with WMAP and the Lyman- α forest, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 063534 [ astro-ph/0501562]

    arXiv 2005

  4. [4]

    McDonald, U

    P. McDonald, U. Seljak, S. Burles, D. J. Schlegel, D. H. Weinberg, R. Cen et al., The Ly α Forest Power Spectrum from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , ApJS 163 (2006) 80 [ astro-ph/0405013]

    arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    Palanque-Delabrouille, C

    N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, A. Borde, J.-M. Le Goff, G. Rossi, M. Viel et al., The one-dimensional 7 In the context of galaxy clustering such an approach is known as the hybrid EFT (HEFT; [102–105]). Lyα forest power spectrum from BOSS , A&A 559 (2013) A85 [ 1306.5896]

    arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    Chabanier, N

    S. Chabanier, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, J.-M. Le Goff, E. Armengaud, J. Bautista et al., The one-dimensional power spectrum from the SDSS DR14 Lyα forests, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2019 (2019) 017 [ 1812.03554]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Pedersen, A

    C. Pedersen, A. Font-Ribera, K. K. Rogers, P. McDonald, H. V. Peiris, A. Pontzen et al., An emulator for the Lyman- α forest in beyond- ΛCDM cosmologies, JCAP 05 (2021) 033 [ 2011.15127]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Ravoux, M

    C. Ravoux, M. L. Abdul Karim, E. Armengaud, M. Walther, N. G. Kara¸ caylı, P. Martini et al.,The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument: one-dimensional power spectrum from first Ly α forest samples with Fast Fourier Transform , MNRAS 526 (2023) 5118 [ 2306.06311]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 120 references
  1. [9]

    N. G. Kara¸ caylı, P. Martini, J. Guy, C. Ravoux, M. L. A. Karim, E. Armengaud et al., Optimal 1D Lyα Forest Power Spectrum Estimation - III. DESI early data, MNRAS (2024) [ 2306.06316]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    M. Viel, M. G. Haehnelt and V. Springel, The effect of neutrinos on the matter distribution as probed by the intergalactic medium, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 7 2010 (2010) 015 [ 1003.2422]

    2010 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Palanque-Delabrouille, C

    N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, N. Sch¨ oneberg, J. Lesgourgues, M. Walther, S. Chabanier et al., Hints, neutrino bounds, and WDM constraints from SDSS DR14 Lyman- α and Planck full-survey data , J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2020 (2020) 038 [1911.09073]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    M. M. Ivanov, M. W. Toomey and N. G. Kara¸ caylı, Fundamental Physics with the Lyman-Alpha Forest: Constraints on the Growth of Structure and Neutrino Masses from SDSS with Effective Field Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025) 091001 [ 2405.13208]

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    A. He, R. An, M. M. Ivanov and V. Gluscevic, Self-Interacting Neutrinos in Light of Large-Scale Structure Data, 2309.03956

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    A. He, M. M. Ivanov, S. Bird, R. An and V. Gluscevic, A Fresh Look at Neutrino Self-Interactions With the Lyman-α Forest: Constraints from EFT and PRIYA , 2503.15592

  7. [15]

    Afshordi, P

    N. Afshordi, P. McDonald and D. N. Spergel, Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: The Power Spectrum and Evaporation of Early Structures , ApJ 594 (2003) L71 [ astro-ph/0302035]

    2003 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Murgia, G

    R. Murgia, G. Scelfo, M. Viel and A. Raccanelli, Lyman-α Forest Constraints on Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 071102 [1903.10509]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    M. Viel, G. D. Becker, J. S. Bolton and M. G. Haehnelt, Warm dark matter as a solution to the small scale crisis: New constraints from high redshift Lyman-α forest data, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 043502 [1306.2314]

    2013 arXiv

  10. [18]

    J. Baur, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, C. Magneville and M. Viel, Lyman-alpha forests cool warm dark matter , J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2016 (2016) 012 [ 1512.01981]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Irˇ siˇ c, M

    V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, M. G. Haehnelt, J. S. Bolton, S. Cristiani, G. D. Becker et al., New Constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman- α forest data, ArXiv e-prints (2017) [ 1702.01764]

    2017 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Kobayashi, R

    T. Kobayashi, R. Murgia, A. De Simone, V. Irˇ siˇ c and M. Viel, Lyman-α constraints on ultralight scalar dark matter: Implications for the early and late universe , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 123514 [ 1708.00015]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Armengaud, N

    E. Armengaud, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, D. J. E. Marsh and J. Baur, Constraining the mass of light bosonic dark matter using SDSS Lyman- α forest, MNRAS 471 (2017) 4606 [ 1703.09126]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Murgia, V

    R. Murgia, V. Irˇ siˇ c and M. Viel,Novel constraints on noncold, nonthermal dark matter from Lyman- α forest data, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 083540 [ 1806.08371]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Garzilli, A

    A. Garzilli, A. Magalich, T. Theuns, C. S. Frenk, C. Weniger, O. Ruchayskiy et al., The Lyman- α forest as a diagnostic of the nature of the dark matter , MNRAS 489 (2019) 3456 [ 1809.06585]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Irˇ siˇ c, H

    V. Irˇ siˇ c, H. Xiao and M. McQuinn,Early structure formation constraints on the ultralight axion in the postinflation scenario, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 123518 [1911.11150]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [25]

    K. K. Rogers, C. Dvorkin and H. V. Peiris, Limits on the Light Dark Matter-Proton Cross Section from Cosmic Large-Scale Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 171301 [ 2111.10386]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Villasenor, B

    B. Villasenor, B. Robertson, P. Madau and E. Schneider, New constraints on warm dark matter from the Lyman- α forest power spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 023502 [ 2209.14220]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Irˇ siˇ c, M

    V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, M. G. Haehnelt, J. S. Bolton, M. Molaro, E. Puchwein et al., Unveiling Dark Matter free-streaming at the smallest scales with high redshift Lyman-alpha forest, arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2309.04533 [2309.04533]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Zaldarriaga, Searching for Fluctuations in the Intergalactic Medium Temperature Using the Ly α Forest, ApJ 564 (2002) 153 [ astro-ph/0102205]

    M. Zaldarriaga, Searching for Fluctuations in the Intergalactic Medium Temperature Using the Ly α Forest, ApJ 564 (2002) 153 [ astro-ph/0102205]

    2002 arXiv

  21. [29]

    A. A. Meiksin, The physics of the intergalactic medium, Reviews of Modern Physics 81 (2009) 1405 [0711.3358]

    2009 arXiv

  22. [30]

    M. Viel, J. Lesgourgues, M. G. Haehnelt, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto, Can Sterile Neutrinos Be Ruled Out as Warm Dark Matter Candidates? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 071301 [ astro-ph/0605706]

    2006 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Walther, J

    M. Walther, J. O˜ norbe, J. F. Hennawi and Z. Luki´ c, New Constraints on IGM Thermal Evolution from the Lyα Forest Power Spectrum, ApJ 872 (2019) 13 [1808.04367]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    J. S. Bolton, M. Viel, T. S. Kim, M. G. Haehnelt and R. F. Carswell, Possible evidence for an inverted temperature-density relation in the intergalactic medium from the flux distribution of the Ly α forest, MNRAS 386 (2008) 1131 [ 0711.2064]

    2008 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Garzilli, J

    A. Garzilli, J. S. Bolton, T. S. Kim, S. Leach and M. Viel, The intergalactic medium thermal history at redshift z = 1.7-3.2 from the Ly α forest: a comparison of measurements using wavelets and the flux distribution, MNRAS 424 (2012) 1723 [ 1202.3577]

    2012 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Gaikwad, R

    P. Gaikwad, R. Srianand, V. Khaire and T. R. Choudhury, Effect of non-equilibrium ionization on derived physical conditions of the high-z intergalactic medium, MNRAS 490 (2019) 1588 [ 1812.01016]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Boera, G

    E. Boera, G. D. Becker, J. S. Bolton and F. Nasir, Revealing Reionization with the Thermal History of the Intergalactic Medium: New Constraints from the Ly α Flux Power Spectrum , ApJ 872 (2019) 101 [1809.06980]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Gaikwad, R

    P. Gaikwad, R. Srianand, M. G. Haehnelt and T. R. Choudhury, A consistent and robust measurement of the thermal state of the IGM at 2 ≤ z ≤ 4 from a large sample of Ly α forest spectra: evidence for late and rapid He II reionization , MNRAS 506 (2021) 4389 [2009.00016]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Wilson, V

    B. Wilson, V. Irˇ siˇ c and M. McQuinn,A measurement of the Ly β forest power spectrum and its cross with the Ly α forest in X-Shooter XQ-100 , MNRAS 509 (2022) 2423 [ 2106.04837]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Villasenor, B

    B. Villasenor, B. Robertson, P. Madau and E. Schneider, Inferring the Thermal History of the Intergalactic Medium from the Properties of the Hydrogen and Helium Ly α Forest, ApJ 933 (2022) 59 [2111.00019]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. C. Hill, V. Irˇ siˇ c and B. D. Sherwin, Canonical Hubble-Tension-Resolving Early Dark Energy Cosmologies are Inconsistent with the Lyman- α Forest, 2303.00746

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Garny, T

    M. Garny, T. Konstandin, L. Sagunski and S. Tulin, Lyman-α forest constraints on interacting dark sectors , JCAP 09 (2018) 011 [ 1805.12203]. 8

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Fuß and M

    L. Fuß and M. Garny, Decaying Dark Matter and Lyman-α forest constraints, 2210.06117

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Seljak, A

    U. Seljak, A. Slosar and P. McDonald, Cosmological parameters from combining the Lyman-alpha forest with CMB, galaxy clustering and SN constraints , JCAP 10 (2006) 014 [ astro-ph/0604335]

    2006 arXiv

  35. [43]

    McDonald and D

    P. McDonald and D. J. Eisenstein, Dark energy and curvature from a future baryonic acoustic oscillation survey using the Lyman- α forest, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 063009 [ astro-ph/0607122]

    2007 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Slosar, V

    A. Slosar, V. Irˇ siˇ c, D. Kirkby, S. Bailey, N. G. Busca, T. Delubac et al., Measurement of baryon acoustic oscillations in the Lyman- α forest fluctuations in BOSS data release 9 , J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2013 (2013) 026 [ 1301.3459]

    2013 arXiv

  37. [45]

    N. G. Busca, T. Delubac, J. Rich, S. Bailey, A. Font-Ribera, D. Kirkby et al., Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Ly α forest of BOSS quasars , A&A 552 (2013) A96 [ 1211.2616]

    2013 arXiv

  38. [46]

    du Mas des Bourboux, J

    H. du Mas des Bourboux, J. Rich, A. Font-Ribera, V. de Sainte Agathe, J. Farr, T. Etourneau et al., The Completed SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations with Ly α Forests, ApJ 901 (2020) 153 [ 2007.08995]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Cuceu, A

    A. Cuceu, A. Font-Ribera, B. Joachimi and S. Nadathur, Cosmology beyond BAO from the 3D distribution of the Lyman- α forest, MNRAS 506 (2021) 5439 [ 2103.14075]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Cuceu, A

    A. Cuceu, A. Font-Ribera, S. Nadathur, B. Joachimi and P. Martini, Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion Rate at Redshift 2.3 from the Lyman- α Forest, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 191003 [ 2209.13942]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Gordon, A

    C. Gordon, A. Cuceu, J. Chaves-Montero, A. Font-Ribera, A. Xochitl Gonz´ alez-Morales, J. Aguilar et al., 3D Correlations in the Lyman- α Forest from Early DESI Data , arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2308.10950 [2308.10950]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    DESI collaboration, DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints, 2503.14738

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Aghamousa, J

    DESI Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. E. Allen et al., The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design, arXiv e-prints (2016) arXiv:1611.00036 [1611.00036]

    2016 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Abareshi, J

    B. Abareshi, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D. M. Alexander, R. Alfarsy et al., Overview of the Instrumentation for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, arXiv e-prints (2022) arXiv:2205.10939 [2205.10939]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    DESI Collaboration, A. G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D. M. Alexander et al., DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations , arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2404.03002 [2404.03002]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    DESI Collaboration, A. G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D. M. Alexander et al., DESI 2024 IV: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman Alpha Forest, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2404.03001 [2404.03001]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    D. J. Schlegel, S. Ferraro, G. Aldering, C. Baltay, S. BenZvi, R. Besuner et al., A Spectroscopic Road Map for Cosmic Frontier: DESI, DESI-II, Stage-5 , arXiv e-prints (2022) arXiv:2209.03585 [ 2209.03585]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Besuner, A

    R. Besuner, A. Dey, A. Drlica-Wagner, H. Ebina, G. Fernandez Moroni, S. Ferraro et al., The Spectroscopic Stage-5 Experiment, arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2503.07923 [ 2503.07923]

    2025

  49. [57]

    Font-Ribera, P

    A. Font-Ribera, P. McDonald and A. Slosar, How to estimate the 3D power spectrum of the Lyman- α forest, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2018 (2018) 003 [1710.11036]

    2018 arXiv

  50. [58]

    de Belsunce, O

    R. de Belsunce, O. H. E. Philcox, V. Irsic, P. McDonald, J. Guy and N. Palanque-Delabrouille, The 3D Lyman- α forest power spectrum from eBOSS DR16, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 533 (2024) 3756 [2403.08241]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Nguyen, F

    N.-M. Nguyen, F. Schmidt, B. Tucci, M. Reinecke and A. Kosti´ c,How Much Information Can Be Extracted from Galaxy Clustering at the Field Level? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 221006 [ 2403.03220]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Akitsu, M

    K. Akitsu, M. Simonovi´ c, S.-F. Chen, G. Cabass and M. Zaldarriaga, Cosmology inference with perturbative forward modeling at the field level: comparison with the joint power spectrum and bispectrum analysis ,

  53. [61]

    Hadzhiyska, A

    B. Hadzhiyska, A. Font-Ribera, A. Cuceu, S. Chabanier, J. Aguilar, D. Brooks et al., Planting a Lyman alpha forest on ABACUSSUMMIT , MNRAS 524 (2023) 1008 [ 2305.08899]

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Hadzhiyska, R

    B. Hadzhiyska, R. de Belsunce, A. Cuceu, J. Guy, M. M. Ivanov, H. Coquinot et al., Measuring and unbiasing the BAO shift in the Lyman-Alpha forest with AbacusSummit, 2503.13442

    arXiv

  55. [63]

    R. A. C. Croft, Characterization of Lyman Alpha Spectra and Predictions of Structure Formation Models: A Flux Statistics Approach , in Eighteenth Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics , A. V. Olinto, J. A. Frieman and D. N. Schramm, eds., p. 664, 1998, astro-ph/9701166

    1998 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Qezlou, A

    M. Qezlou, A. B. Newman, G. C. Rudie and S. Bird, Characterizing Protoclusters and Protogroups at z 2.5 Using Ly α Tomography, ApJ 930 (2022) 109 [2112.03930]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Peirani, D

    S. Peirani, D. H. Weinberg, S. Colombi, J. Blaizot, Y. Dubois and C. Pichon, LyMAS: Predicting Large-scale Lyα Forest Statistics from the Dark Matter Density Field , ApJ 784 (2014) 11 [ 1306.1533]

    2014 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Peirani, S

    S. Peirani, S. Prunet, S. Colombi, C. Pichon, D. H. Weinberg, C. Laigle et al., LyMAS reloaded: improving the predictions of the large-scale Lyman- α forest statistics from dark matter density and velocity fields , MNRAS 514 (2022) 3222 [ 2204.06365]

    2022 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Sorini, J

    D. Sorini, J. O˜ norbe, Z. Luki´ c and J. F. Hennawi, Modeling the Ly α Forest in Collisionless Simulations , ApJ 827 (2016) 97 [ 1602.08099]

    2016 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Sinigaglia, F.-S

    F. Sinigaglia, F.-S. Kitaura, A. Balaguera-Antol ´ ınez, I. Shimizu, K. Nagamine, M. S´ anchez-Benavente et al., Mapping the Three-dimensional Ly α Forest Large-scale Structure in Real and Redshift Space , ApJ 927 (2022) 230

    2022

  61. [69]

    Sinigaglia, F

    F. Sinigaglia, F. S. Kitaura, K. Nagamine, Y. Oku and A. Balaguera-Antol ´ ınez,Field-level Lyman- α forest modeling in redshift space via augmented nonlocal Fluctuating Gunn-Peterson Approximation , A&A 682 (2024) A21 [ 2305.10428]

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Jacobus, S

    C. Jacobus, S. Chabanier, P. Harrington, J. Emberson, Z. Luki´ c and S. Habib,A Gigaparsec-Scale Hydrodynamic Volume Reconstructed with Deep 9 Learning, 2411.16920

  63. [71]

    McDonald and A

    P. McDonald and A. Roy, Clustering of dark matter tracers: generalizing bias for the coming era of precision LSS, JCAP 0908 (2009) 020 [ 0902.0991]

    2009 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Baumann, A

    D. Baumann, A. Nicolis, L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, Cosmological Non-Linearities as an Effective Fluid, JCAP 1207 (2012) 051 [ 1004.2488]

    2012 arXiv

  65. [73]

    J. J. M. Carrasco, S. Foreman, D. Green and L. Senatore, The Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures at Two Loops , JCAP 07 (2014) 057 [1310.0464]

    2014 arXiv

  66. [74]

    M. M. Ivanov, Effective Field Theory for Large Scale Structure, 2212.08488

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    Schmittfull, M

    M. Schmittfull, M. Simonovi´ c, M. M. Ivanov, O. H. E. Philcox and M. Zaldarriaga, Modeling Galaxies in Redshift Space at the Field Level , JCAP 05 (2021) 059 [2012.03334]

    2021 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Obuljen, M

    A. Obuljen, M. Simonovi´ c, A. Schneider and R. Feldmann, Modeling HI at the field level , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 083528 [ 2207.12398]

    2023 arXiv

  69. [77]

    McDonald, J

    P. McDonald, J. Miralda-Escude, M. Rauch, W. L. W. Sargent, T. A. Barlow, R. Cen et al., The Observed probability distribution function, power spectrum, and correlation function of the transmitted flux in the Lyman-alpha forest, Astrophys. J. 543 (2000) 1 [astro-ph/9911196]

    2000 arXiv

  70. [78]

    J. J. Givans and C. M. Hirata, Redshift-space streaming velocity effects on the Lyman- α forest baryon acoustic oscillation scale , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 023515 [2002.12296]

    2020 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Desjacques, D

    V. Desjacques, D. Jeong and F. Schmidt, The Galaxy Power Spectrum and Bispectrum in Redshift Space , JCAP 1812 (2018) 035 [ 1806.04015]

    2018 arXiv

  72. [81]

    M. M. Ivanov, Lyman alpha forest power spectrum in effective field theory , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 023507 [2309.10133]

    2024 arXiv

  73. [82]

    The lyman-α forest skew spectrum

    R. de Belsunce, J. M. Sullivan and P. McDonald, “The lyman-α forest skew spectrum.” 2025

    2025

  74. [83]

    J. S. Bolton, E. Puchwein, D. Sijacki, M. G. Haehnelt, T.-S. Kim, A. Meiksin et al., The Sherwood simulation suite: overview and data comparisons with the Lyman α forest at redshifts 2 ≤ z ≤ 5, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 464 (2017) 897 [ 1605.03462]

    2017 arXiv

  75. [84]

    McDonald, Toward a measurement of the cosmological geometry at Z 2: predicting lyman-alpha forest correlation in three dimensions, and the potential of future data sets , Astrophys

    P. McDonald, Toward a measurement of the cosmological geometry at Z 2: predicting lyman-alpha forest correlation in three dimensions, and the potential of future data sets , Astrophys. J. 585 (2003) 34 [astro-ph/0108064]

    2003 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Kaiser, Clustering in real space and in redshift space, Mon

    N. Kaiser, Clustering in real space and in redshift space, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 227 (1987) 1

    1987

  77. [86]

    Schmittfull, M

    M. Schmittfull, M. Simonovi´ c, V. Assassi and M. Zaldarriaga, Modeling Biased Tracers at the Field Level, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 043514 [ 1811.10640]

    2019 arXiv

  78. [87]

    S.-F. Chen, Z. Vlah and M. White, The Lyα forest flux correlation function: a perturbation theory perspective , JCAP 05 (2021) 053 [ 2103.13498]

    2021 arXiv

  79. [88]

    Senatore and M

    L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, The IR-resummed Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures , JCAP 1502 (2015) 013 [ 1404.5954]

    2015 arXiv

  80. [89]

    Baldauf, M

    T. Baldauf, M. Mirbabayi, M. Simonovi´ c and M. Zaldarriaga, Equivalence Principle and the Baryon Acoustic Peak, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 043514 [1504.04366]

    2015 arXiv

  81. [90]

    Z. Vlah, U. Seljak, M. Y. Chu and Y. Feng, Perturbation theory, effective field theory, and oscillations in the power spectrum , JCAP 1603 (2016) 057 [1509.02120]

    2016 arXiv

  82. [91]

    D. Blas, M. Garny, M. M. Ivanov and S. Sibiryakov, Time-Sliced Perturbation Theory for Large Scale Structure I: General Formalism , JCAP 1607 (2016) 052 [1512.05807]

    2016 arXiv

  83. [92]

    D. Blas, M. Garny, M. M. Ivanov and S. Sibiryakov, Time-Sliced Perturbation Theory II: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Infrared Resummation , JCAP 1607 (2016) 028 [ 1605.02149]

    2016 arXiv

  84. [93]

    M. M. Ivanov and S. Sibiryakov, Infrared Resummation for Biased Tracers in Redshift Space , JCAP 1807 (2018) 053 [ 1804.05080]

    2018 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Vasudevan, M

    A. Vasudevan, M. M. Ivanov, S. Sibiryakov and J. Lesgourgues, Time-sliced perturbation theory with primordial non-Gaussianity and effects of large bulk flows on inflationary oscillating features , JCAP 09 (2019) 037 [ 1906.08697]

    2019 arXiv

  86. [95]

    M. M. Ivanov, A. Obuljen, C. Cuesta-Lazaro and M. W. Toomey, Full-shape analysis with simulation-based priors: cosmological parameters and the structure growth anomaly , 2409.10609

    arXiv

  87. [97]

    background,

    based on the best-fit Planck cosmology with cosmo- logical parameters set to Ω m = 0.308, Ωb = 0.0482, h= 0.678, σ8 = 0 .829, ns = 0 .961 [98]. 4 The simulation snapshot is centered at redshift z = 2.8 with a grid res- olution of 1024 cells in the x, ydirections and of 2048 al...

  88. [98]

    Springel, The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2, MNRAS 364 (2005) 1105 [astro-ph/0505010]

    V. Springel, The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2, MNRAS 364 (2005) 1105 [astro-ph/0505010]

    2005 arXiv

  89. [99]

    Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters , A&A 571 (2014) A16 [ 1303.5076]

    2014 arXiv

  90. [100]

    Chudaykin and M

    A. Chudaykin and M. M. Ivanov, Lyman Alpha Forest - Halo Cross-Correlations in Effective Field Theory , arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2501.04770 [ 2501.04770]

    2025 arXiv

  91. [101]

    A. M. Cieplak and A. Slosar, Towards physics responsible for large-scale Lyman- α forest bias parameters, JCAP 03 (2016) 016 [ 1509.07875]

    2016 arXiv

  92. [102]

    J. J. Givans, A. Font-Ribera, A. Slosar, L. Seeyave, C. Pedersen, K. K. Rogers et al., Non-linearities in the Lyman-α forest and in its cross-correlation with dark matter halos , JCAP 09 (2022) 070 [ 2205.00962]

    2022 arXiv

  93. [103]

    Modi, S.-F

    C. Modi, S.-F. Chen and M. White, Simulations and symmetries, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 492 (2020) 5754 [1910.07097]

    2020 arXiv

  94. [104]

    Hadzhiyska, C

    B. Hadzhiyska, C. Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, D. Alonso, A. Nicola and A. Slosar, Hefty enhancement of cosmological constraints from the DES Y1 data using a hybrid effective field theory approach to galaxy bias , JCAP 09 (2021) 020 [ 2103.09820]

    2021 arXiv

  95. [105]

    Kokron, J

    N. Kokron, J. DeRose, S.-F. Chen, M. White and R. H. Wechsler, The cosmology dependence of galaxy clustering and lensing from a hybrid N-body-perturbation theory model, MNRAS 505 (2021) 1422 [2101.11014]

    2021 arXiv

  96. [106]

    J. M. Sullivan and S.-F. Chen, Local primordial non-Gaussian bias at the field level , J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2025 (2025) 016 [ 2410.18039]. 1

    2025 arXiv

  97. [107]

    Weinberger, V

    R. Weinberger, V. Springel, L. Hernquist, A. Pillepich, F. Marinacci, R. Pakmor et al., Simulating galaxy formation with black hole driven thermal and kinetic feedback, MNRAS 465 (2017) 3291 [ 1607.03486]

    2017 arXiv

  98. [108]

    Pillepich et al., Simulating Galaxy Formation with the IllustrisTNG Model , Mon

    A. Pillepich et al., Simulating Galaxy Formation with the IllustrisTNG Model , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 473 (2018) 4077 [ 1703.02970]

    2018 arXiv

  99. [109]

    Chabanier, C

    S. Chabanier, C. Ravoux, L. Latrille, J. Sexton, E. Armengaud, J. Bautista et al., The ACCEL2 project: simulating Lyman- α forest in large-volume hydrodynamical simulations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 534 (2024) 2674 [ 2407.04473]

    2024 arXiv

  100. [110]

    Villaescusa-Navarro, D

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro, D. Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, S. Genel, D. N. Spergel, R. S. Somerville, R. Dave et al., The CAMELS Project: Cosmology and Astrophysics with Machine-learning Simulations, ApJ 915 (2021) 71 [2010.00619]

    2021 arXiv

  101. [111]

    Villaescusa-Navarro, S

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro, S. Genel, D. Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, L. A. Perez, P. Villanueva-Domingo, D. Wadekar et al., The CAMELS Project: Public Data Release , ApJS 265 (2023) 54 [ 2201.01300]

    2023 arXiv

  102. [112]

    S. Bird, M. Fernandez, M.-F. Ho, M. Qezlou, R. Monadi, Y. Ni et al., PRIYA: a new suite of Lyman-α forest simulations for cosmology , JCAP 10 (2023) 037 [ 2306.05471]

    2023 arXiv

  103. [113]

    Nguyen, F

    N.-M. Nguyen, F. Schmidt, G. Lavaux and J. Jasche, Impacts of the physical data model on the forward inference of initial conditions from biased tracers , JCAP 03 (2021) 058 [ 2011.06587]

    2021 arXiv

  104. [114]

    Modi and O

    C. Modi and O. H. E. Philcox, Hybrid SBI or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Learn the Likelihood , 2309.10270

    arXiv

  105. [115]

    M. M. Ivanov, C. Cuesta-Lazaro, S. Mishra-Sharma, A. Obuljen and M. W. Toomey, Full-shape analysis with simulation-based priors: constraints on single field inflation from BOSS , 2402.13310

    arXiv

  106. [116]

    C. Hahn, M. Eickenberg, S. Ho, J. Hou, P. Lemos, E. Massara et al., SIMBIG : The First Cosmological Constraints from the Non-Linear Galaxy Bispectrum , 2310.15243

    arXiv

  107. [117]

    Akitsu, Y

    K. Akitsu, Y. Li and T. Okumura, Quadratic shape biases in three-dimensional halo intrinsic alignments , JCAP 08 (2023) 068 [ 2306.00969]

    2023 arXiv

  108. [118]

    Akitsu, Mapping the galaxy-halo connection to the galaxy bias: implication to the HOD-informed prior , 2410.08998

    K. Akitsu, Mapping the galaxy-halo connection to the galaxy bias: implication to the HOD-informed prior , 2410.08998

    arXiv

  109. [119]

    M. M. Ivanov et al., The Millennium and Astrid galaxies in effective field theory: comparison with galaxy-halo connection models at the field level , 2412.01888

    arXiv

  110. [120]

    J. M. Sullivan, C. Cuesta-Lazaro, M. M. Ivanov, Y. Ni, S. Bose, B. Hadzhiyska et al., High-redshift Millennium and Astrid galaxies in effective field theory at the field level, 2505.03626

    arXiv

  111. [121]

    Modeling the intrinsic alignment at the field level

    K. Akitsu, Y. Li and T. Okumura, “Modeling the intrinsic alignment at the field level.” 2025

    2025

  112. [122]

    shifted” by the Zel’dovich displacement ψ as ˜O(k) = Z d3q O(q)e−ik·(q+ψ(q)+f ˆn(ψ(q)· ˆn)) . (S5) In particular, this reproduces contributions from the “shifts

    F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gaztanaga and R. Scoccimarro, Large scale structure of the universe and cosmological perturbation theory, Phys. Rep. 367 (2002) 1 [ astro-ph/0112551]. Supplemental Material Details of the forward model.—We now introduce the EFT theory model, brief...

    2002 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.