Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 5 cited by

A hybrid simulation-plus-EFT model reproduces the Lyman-alpha forest power spectrum to 5% down to k = 1 h/Mpc, with residual noise that is nearly scale- and angle-independent.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 16:21 UTC pith:L6ZMD55S

load-bearing objection First HEFT treatment of the Lyman-alpha forest; the whitened noise floor is a real but in-sample finding, and the k~1 h/Mpc claim needs an out-of-sample test and an internal consistency fix. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.13681 v1 pith:L6ZMD55S submitted 2025-12-15 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

Bridging Simulations and EFT: A Hybrid Model of the Lyman-Alpha Forest Field

Roger de Belsunce , Boryana Hadzhiyska , Mikhail M. Ivanov This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords Lyman-alpha foresthybrid effective field theoryforward modelingredshift-space distortionsbaryon acoustic oscillationspower spectrum emulatorstochastic noise
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that a hybrid effective field theory (HEFT) forward model — one that advects a perturbative bias expansion of the Lyman-alpha forest with particle displacements taken from a large N-body simulation — can reproduce the simulated forest field well enough that the modeled power spectrum agrees with the true power spectrum at the 5% level down to k ≈ 1 h/Mpc. On quasi-linear scales the residual noise between model and simulation is nearly white, meaning its power spectrum is roughly constant in scale and angle to the line of sight. If true, this extends the reach of purely perturbative EFT modeling by about 0.2 h/Mpc, which the authors translate into a factor-of-two increase in effective survey volume and up to a 40% reduction in cosmological parameter errors. It also provides a concrete path toward building fast emulators for full-shape Lyman-alpha forest analyses.

Core claim

The central claim is that replacing Zel'dovich displacements with the full nonlinear displacements from an N-body simulation, while keeping the same Lagrangian bias expansion (with the Lyman-alpha-specific line-of-sight operators η and KK∥), removes most of the scale and orientation dependence of the residual stochastic noise. For the mock with a low redshift-space-distortion bias, the cubic HEFT error power spectrum is approximately flat and orientation-independent down to k ~ 1 h/Mpc; for a high-RSD mock, a residual tilt remains but is still vastly reduced relative to EFT. The paper shows the recovered power spectrum agrees with the simulation within 5% up to k_max ~ 1 h/Mpc (1% to ~0.3 h/

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the HEFT field-level model: each dark-matter particle is weighted by a cubic Lagrangian bias expansion F(q) built from the initial density field (δ_L, δ_L², tidal s², line-of-sight operators η and KK∥, etc.), then advected to redshift space using the N-body nonlinear displacement, with the line-of-sight velocity displacement taken from the Zel'dovich prediction. The bias transfer functions β_i(k, μ) are fit by minimizing the low-pass filtered residual field against the simulation, which exploits cosmic-variance cancellation since the HEFT model and simulation share initial conditions. This combination turns the residual noise into an approximately white stochastic term,

Load-bearing premise

The whole validation rests on the synthetic Lyman-alpha forests painted onto the N-body simulation being a faithful stand-in for the real forest; if the real redshift-space distortions or astrophysical feedback produce residual noise that is not white below k ~ 1 h/Mpc, the 5% reach and the emulator plan would not transfer.

What would settle it

Run the exact HEFT field-level fit against a full hydrodynamical simulation of the intergalactic medium at z ≈ 2.5 and compare the residual error power spectrum P_err(k, μ) to the flat white-noise fit: if a strong k- or μ-dependence appears at k below 1 h/Mpc, the white-noise conclusion and the 5% validity range fail for realistic baryonic physics.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, pure-EFT analyses can be pushed from k_max ≈ 0.8 to ≈ 1.0 h/Mpc, equivalent to doubling the effective volume for the 3D Lyman-alpha forest power spectrum and reducing cosmological parameter error bars by up to ~40%.
  • The nearly white residual noise means the small-scale stochastic term can be approximated by a single constant 'shot-noise-like' parameter in cosmological fits, removing the need to model its scale and angle dependence.
  • The transfer functions are smooth and can be compressed into low-order polynomial fits, making it feasible to build a fast power-spectrum emulator calibrated on a suite of simulations with fixed phases, exploiting cosmic-variance cancellation.
  • The framework can be extended to cross-correlations with quasars or galaxies by weighting the same advected operators, potentially yielding combined high-redshift large-scale structure constraints.
  • A field-generation pipeline with this hybrid model can produce a 2 h⁻¹ Gpc volume with DESI-like resolution in under an hour, suitable for validating cosmological inference pipelines.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If the white-noise property holds for real quasar spectra, survey analyses could marginalize a single amplitude for the 3D stochastic term, dramatically reducing the nuisance-parameter dimensionality compared to current heuristic fitting functions.
  • Testable extension: applying the same HEFT procedure to full hydrodynamical simulations rather than the approximate painted mocks would reveal whether the near-white residual persists once thermal pressure and velocity feedback are resolved; a strong scale dependence there would signal that the white-noise conclusion is an artifact of mock simplicity.
  • Neighbouring problem: the same relaxed-symmetry bias operators and advection machinery apply to other line-of-sight observables such as 21-cm intensity mapping, where field-level stochastic noise is a comparable obstacle; the success here suggests a transferable recipe.
  • Editorial inference: the claimed factor-of-two effective volume gain assumes the residual noise is truly white and that a constant shot-noise marginalization captures the remaining systematic; if the tilt seen in the high-RSD mock persists in real data, the gain would be smaller.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a hybrid effective field theory (HEFT) forward model for the 3D Lyman-alpha forest field, combining AbacusSummit nonlinear particle displacements with an LPT-based bias expansion of ten operators (Eq. 1). The bias transfer functions are fitted per (k, mu) bin to FGPA Lyman-alpha mocks painted on AbacusSummit (Secs. 2.3 and 3.1). The authors report that the model reproduces the simulated field power spectrum at the 5% level to k ~ 1 h/Mpc, with a nearly scale- and orientation-independent error power spectrum on quasi-linear scales, extending the reach of a purely perturbative EFT forward model by about 0.2 h/Mpc (Sec. 4.1, Figs. 1-3). They also present polynomial fits to the transfer functions and noise power spectrum (Sec. 4.2, Eq. 12, Tab. III) and outline an emulator strategy for cosmological analyses (Sec. 5).

Significance. If the claims were fully validated, this would be a useful step for DESI-era Lyman-alpha cosmology: extending the quasi-linear regime reduces the need for expensive hydrodynamical mocks and simplifies stochastic modeling. The methodology is clearly described, the fitting procedure is standard, and the paper is careful in several places (e.g., comparing velocity prescriptions, noting NGP and reduced-precision IC noise, and tabulating transfer-function coefficients). The public availability of the AbacusSummit mocks strengthens reproducibility. However, the headline quantitative claims are currently in-sample: the transfer functions are fitted to the same field used as 'truth', and the residual noise properties are therefore properties of that fit. The internal inconsistency between the abstract/Sec. 5 and the Fig. 2 caption on the 5% reach, and the much larger residual scale dependence for model III (the mock closest to DESI-like bias parameters), mean that the significance is conditional on additional out-of-sample validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Sec. 4.1 / Fig. 2 caption] There is a direct inconsistency in the key number. The abstract and Sec. 5 state 5% agreement to k <= 1 h/Mpc, and Sec. 4.1 repeats 'k <~ 1 h/Mpc'. However, the Fig. 2 caption explicitly says 'the power spectrum of the forward model agrees at the 5% level up to k_max ~ 0.8 h/Mpc for HEFT, increasing the reach ... by delta_k ~ 0.15 h/Mpc'. The derived factor-of-two volume gain and ~40% parameter-error reduction are computed from an increase 0.8 -> 1.0 h/Mpc. If the true 5% reach is 0.8 h/Mpc, the abstract and Sec. 5 claims must be revised; if 1.0 h/Mpc is correct, Fig. 2's caption and the quoted delta_k are wrong. This must be reconciled.
  2. [Sec. 2.3, Eqs. (7)-(10); Figs. 1-3] The validation is in-sample. The bias transfer functions beta_i are solved per (k,mu) bin by minimizing the residual against the same AbacusSummit FGPA mock that is subsequently treated as 'truth' in Figs. 1-3. Thus P_err and r_cc measure the residual of the fit, not out-of-sample predictive accuracy. The per-bin fits have far more freedom than the 80 polynomial coefficients of Eq. (12) quoted in Sec. 4.2, so the reported whitening of P_err can partly reflect absorption of deterministic scale- and orientation-dependent bias. The emulator proposed in Sec. 5 uses the polynomial Ansatz and template spectra, but its predictions are not tested against the per-bin fits. I would like to see a held-out test (e.g., fit on one AbacusSummit realization or mock model and evaluate on an independent realization/model, or at least cross-validate the polynomial emulator against the full per-bin fit) bef
  3. [Sec. 4.2, Fig. 4, Tab. II] The 'nearly white' noise claim is not uniform across the mocks used. The paper's own model III, which is closest to DESI/hydro bias parameters (Tab. I and Sec. 3.1), retains a residual scale dependence; Sec. 4.2 describes it as 'approximately an order of magnitude larger' than model I, and Fig. 4 (bottom panel) shows a clear k-dependent residual even after the polynomial fit. The abstract's unconditional statement that the residual noise is 'nearly white' on quasi-linear scales is therefore only demonstrated for the low-b_eta model I. Please qualify the claim to the model(s) for which it holds, and either validate whitening for model III or state explicitly that the emulator must marginalize over a residual scale-dependent component, as hinted in Sec. 4.1.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (4)] The integral over q uses a 'Kronecker delta' notation, but the context requires the 3D Dirac delta distribution. Please use \delta_D^{(3)} or state the intended normalization explicitly.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (11)] The sentence 'we include terms linear in k to account for higher-order loop corrections' appears to be a typo: Eq. (11) contains a cubic term a_3 k^3, not a linear term. Please correct the wording to 'odd powers of k' or similar, if that was the intent.
  3. [Sec. 2.1, Eq. (1)] The notation in the equation mixes F(q) for the field and 'beta_cb' for the constant operator's transfer function. This is understandable, but it would help to define the mean-subtracted operators explicitly; currently 'langle ... rangle' appears in several terms without specifying whether it is an ensemble average or a simulation-box average.
  4. [Sec. 5] The emulator discussion in Sec. 5 is schematic; Eqs. (13)-(14) are correct in spirit, but the paper does not state how the beta coefficients entering the emulator would be obtained from the polynomial fits of Eq. (12) or whether the template cross-spectra are to be computed from the same advected fields. Adding one or two sentences on the emulator calibration pipeline would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation: the reported agreement is an in-sample fit residual, but the paper labels it as such and the white-noise property is not imposed by the fit.

full rationale

All quantitative claims (5% power-spectrum agreement at k≲1 h/Mpc; nearly white P_err) are measured on the same AbacusSummit FGPA mock used to fit the bias transfer functions β_i(k,µ) in Eqs. (8)–(10). This is an in-sample goodness-of-fit, not an out-of-sample prediction. However, that is not circular: the paper explicitly states it 'fit[s] a bias expansion at the field level' and compares 'to the input simulations' (Sec. 4), and the near-whiteness of P_err is not imposed by the fitting procedure — the polynomial fit of Eq. (11) returns small but non-zero scale/orientation coefficients, and model III retains a residual tilt that the paper reports (Sec. 4.2, Fig. 4). The whitening is thus a nontrivial property of the residual after projection onto the operator basis. Self-citations to Refs. [56,63,92] provide the mock and operator basis, but they are published external results with independent validation, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled through them. The abstract's k≤1 h/Mpc vs Fig. 2 caption's 0.8 h/Mpc and the model-I vs model-III residual difference are robustness/correctness caveats, not circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central model depends on a large set of fitted transfer functions (~80 numbers) and the choice of Zel'dovich velocities, plus several domain assumptions about the faithfulness of the mocks and the completeness of the bias expansion. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Bias transfer functions beta_i(k, mu) (10 operators x 8 polynomial coefficients) = Tab. III (Models I and III)
    Fitted to the AbacusSummit truth field via Eqs. (7)-(10); the model's power-spectrum agreement depends on these ~80 in-sample fitted numbers.
  • P_err noise polynomial coefficients (a0, a2, a3, a4, a22, a44) = Tab. II
    Fitted to the residual error power spectrum (Eq. 11) to characterize the claimed white-noise behavior; not predicted from first principles.
  • Zel'dovich LOS velocity prescription
    Chosen as fiducial after testing 2LPT and raw simulation velocities (Sec. 2.2); not fitted, but a hand-selected modeling choice that affects the residual.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The bias expansion Eq. (1), truncated at second order in the initial conditions (with delta^3 and KK_parallel), is a complete basis for the Lyman-alpha field on quasi-linear scales.
    Invoked in Sec. 2.1; the fit's success depends on this EFT operator set, but the paper does not test convergence with higher-order operators.
  • domain assumption The FGPA-based mocks (Sec. 3.1) faithfully represent the Lyman-alpha forest signal, including redshift-space distortions, with bias parameters close to observed data.
    The validation and the proposed emulator calibrate on these mocks; if the mocks miss real physics (e.g., thermal broadening, continuum fitting), the white-noise result may not transfer to DESI data.
  • domain assumption The stochastic residual epsilon(k) is uncorrelated with the deterministic operators and initial conditions (loss function Eq. 7).
    Requires that the fitted deterministic model captures all mode-correlated signal; if residual correlated with ICs remains, the white-noise interpretation fails.
  • ad hoc to paper The transfer functions beta_i(k, mu) are smooth and well-approximated by the polynomial Ansatz Eq. (12).
    The Ansatz is introduced in Sec. 4.2 to compress the fitted transfer functions; the paper notes this differs from earlier parametrizations and that a first-principles prediction is deferred to a companion paper.
  • domain assumption AbacusSummit stores initial positions at reduced precision, from which Lagrangian coordinates q can be inferred without significant bias.
    Sec. 2.2 note: the reduced-precision ICs introduce stochastic noise into the HEFT operators; the paper assumes this noise is subdominant.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 22466 in / 13536 out tokens · 112016 ms · 2026-08-03T16:21:53.621530+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The Lyman-alpha (Lya) forest is a unique probe of cosmology and the intergalactic medium at high redshift and small scales. The statistical power of the ongoing Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) demands precise theoretical tools to model the Lya forest. We present a hybrid effective field theory (HEFT) forward model in redshift space that leverages the accuracy of non-linear particle displacements computed using the N-body simulation suite AbacusSummit with the predictive power of an analytical, perturbative bias forward model in the framework of the effective field theory (EFT). The residual noise between the model and the simulated Lya field has a nearly white (scale-and orientation-independent) power spectrum on quasi-linear scales, substantially simplifying its modeling compared to a purely perturbative description. As a consequence of the improved control over the 3D Lya forest stochasticity, we find agreement between the modeled and the true power spectra at the 5 per cent level down to scales of k <= 1 h/Mpc. This procedure offers a promising path toward constructing efficient and accurate emulators to predict large-scale clustering summary statistics for full-shape cosmological analyses of Lya forest data from both DESI and its successor, DESI-II.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.13681 by Boryana Hadzhiyska, Mikhail M. Ivanov, Roger de Belsunce.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Analytic compression of the effective field theory of the Lyman-alpha forest

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Analytic compression of EFT parameters for Lyα forest P1D via Fisher matrix and linearization allows efficient marginalization, saturating constraints with linear bias plus five effective terms and forecasting 10% and...

  2. Lyman-Alpha Forest and its Cross-Correlation with High-Redshift Galaxies in Effective Field Theory at the Field Level

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An EFT-based field-level forward model for the Lyman-alpha forest matches simulations at the percent level on quasi-linear scales and generates mocks for DESI and DESI-II analyses.

  3. Biased tracers, Hybrid Effective Field Theory and Modified Gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Extends HEFT to f(R) gravity for loop-corrected biased power spectra and outlines emulator extensions from LambdaCDM codes.

  4. GGI Lectures on Large-Scale Structure Perturbation Theory (Effective Field Theory)

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 2.0

    Pedagogical notes derive large-scale-structure EFT from symmetries, covering SPT failures, BAO IR resummation, counterterms, galaxy bias, redshift-space distortions, and Lagrangian PT.

  5. Machine Learning Techniques for Astrophysics and Cosmology: Lyman-$\alpha$ forest

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Review of machine learning applications for analyzing Lyman-alpha forest observations to probe cosmology, reionization, and dark matter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 106 linked inside Pith · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    This creates a series of absorption fea- tures in their observed spectrum – the Lyman-α(Ly-α) forest [1]

    INTRODUCTION Light emitted by high-redshift quasars (2 < ∼ z < ∼ 5) is absorbed in the low-density, highly ionized intergalactic medium (IGM). This creates a series of absorption fea- tures in their observed spectrum – the Lyman-α(Ly-α) forest [1]. Correlations along the line-of-sight have pro- vided strong constraints on small-scale physics using the one...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    In the following, we will briefly summa- rize HEFT and refer the reader to Refs

    HYBRID EFT FOR W ARD MODEL The hybrid effective field theory (HEFT; [68]) com- bines a perturbative bias expansion using Lagrangian perturbation theory (LPT) withN-body techniques to solve the full non-linear dynamics to compute particle displacements. In the following, we will briefly summa- rize HEFT and refer the reader to Refs. [75, 76] for a review o...

  3. [3]

    shifted operator basis

    SIMULA TIONS We validate our perturbative forward model using the AbacusSummitsimulations and compute the displace- ments using the same simulations. In brief,Abacus- Summitis a suite of cosmologicalN-body simulations 2 Note that here we solve the inverse problem given in Eq. (8) and in Ref. [63] we use the “shifted operator basis” and apply the Gram-Schm...

  4. [4]

    shot-noise

    RESUL TS In this section we forward model the Ly-αforest trans- mitted flux fraction,δ F , by evolving a set of initial condi- tions using a hybrid EFT (HEFT) model, introduced in Sec. 2, and fit a set of bias transfer functions to theAba- cusSummitsimulations, introduced in Sec. 3. We assess the performance of our forward model in Sec. 4.1 and quantify t...

  5. [5]

    SUMMAR Y AND CONCLUSION The Ly-αforest – as measured by the currently observ- ing Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) – is a pristine tracer of large-scale structure at Mpc scales and below at high redshift (2≤z≤4). The Ly-αforest has four main advantages compared to traditional galaxy sur- veys: First, it probes a significantly larger cosmologica...

  6. [6]

    Ravoux, M

    C. Ravoux, M. L. Abdul Karim, E. Armengaud, M. Walther, N. G. Kara¸ caylı, P. Martini et al.,The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument: one-dimensional power spectrum from first Lyαforest samples with Fast Fourier Transform, MNRAS526 (2023) 5118 [2306.06311]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    N. G. Kara¸ caylı, P. Martini, J. Guy, C. Ravoux, M. L. A. Karim, E. Armengaud et al.,Optimal 1D LyαForest Power Spectrum Estimation - III. DESI early data, MNRAS (2024) [2306.06316]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  8. [9]

    M. Viel, J. Lesgourgues, M. G. Haehnelt, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto,Constraining warm dark matter candidates including sterile neutrinos and light gravitinos with WMAP and the Lyman-αforest, Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 063534 [astro-ph/0501562]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  9. [10]

    McDonald, U

    P. McDonald, U. Seljak, S. Burles, D. J. Schlegel, D. H. Weinberg, R. Cen et al.,The LyαForest Power Spectrum from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, ApJS163 (2006) 80 [astro-ph/0405013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  10. [11]

    Chabanier, N

    S. Chabanier, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, J.-M. Le Goff, E. Armengaud, J. Bautista et al.,The one-dimensional power spectrum from the SDSS DR14 Lyαforests, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2019 (2019) 017 [1812.03554]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [12]

    Pedersen, A

    C. Pedersen, A. Font-Ribera, K. K. Rogers, P. McDonald, H. V. Peiris, A. Pontzen et al.,An emulator for the Lyman-αforest in beyond-ΛCDM cosmologies,JCAP05(2021) 033 [2011.15127]. 12

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [13]

    Murgia, G

    R. Murgia, G. Scelfo, M. Viel and A. Raccanelli, Lyman-αForest Constraints on Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 071102 [1903.10509]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [14]

    M. M. Ivanov and S. Trifinopoulos,Effective Field Theory Constraints on Primordial Black Holes from the High-Redshift Lyman-αForest,2508.04767

    arXiv

  14. [15]

    Seljak, A

    U. Seljak, A. Makarov, P. McDonald, S. F. Anderson, N. A. Bahcall, J. Brinkmann et al.,Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Lyαforest and galaxy bias: Constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neutrino mass, and dark energy, Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 103515 [astro-ph/0407372]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  15. [16]

    M. Viel, M. G. Haehnelt and V. Springel,The effect of neutrinos on the matter distribution as probed by the intergalactic medium, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2010(2010) 015 [1003.2422]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  16. [17]

    Palanque-Delabrouille, C

    N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, A. Borde, J.-M. Le Goff, G. Rossi, M. Viel et al.,The one-dimensional Lyαforest power spectrum from BOSS, A&A559 (2013) A85 [1306.5896]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  17. [18]

    Palanque-Delabrouille, C

    N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, N. Sch¨ oneberg, J. Lesgourgues, M. Walther, S. Chabanier et al.,Hints, neutrino bounds, and WDM constraints from SDSS DR14 Lyman-αand Planck full-survey data, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2020(2020) 038 [1911.09073]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [19]

    Afshordi, P

    N. Afshordi, P. McDonald and D. N. Spergel, Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: The Power Spectrum and Evaporation of Early Structures, ApJ 594(2003) L71 [astro-ph/0302035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  19. [20]

    Murgia, V

    R. Murgia, V. Irˇ siˇ c and M. Viel,Novel constraints on noncold, nonthermal dark matter from Lyman-αforest data, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 083540 [1806.08371]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [21]

    Garzilli, A

    A. Garzilli, A. Magalich, T. Theuns, C. S. Frenk, C. Weniger, O. Ruchayskiy et al.,The Lyman-αforest as a diagnostic of the nature of the dark matter, MNRAS489(2019) 3456 [1809.06585]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [22]

    M. Viel, G. D. Becker, J. S. Bolton and M. G. Haehnelt,Warm dark matter as a solution to the small scale crisis: New constraints from high redshift Lyman-αforest data, Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 043502 [1306.2314]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [23]

    J. Baur, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, C. Magneville and M. Viel,Lyman-alpha forests cool warm dark matter, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2016(2016) 012 [1512.01981]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [24]

    Irˇ siˇ c, M

    V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, M. G. Haehnelt, J. S. Bolton, S. Cristiani, G. D. Becker et al.,New Constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman-αforest data, ArXiv e-prints(2017) [1702.01764]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [25]

    Kobayashi, R

    T. Kobayashi, R. Murgia, A. De Simone, V. Irˇ siˇ c and M. Viel,Lyman-αconstraints on ultralight scalar dark matter: Implications for the early and late universe, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 123514 [1708.00015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [26]

    Armengaud, N

    E. Armengaud, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, D. J. E. Marsh and J. Baur,Constraining the mass of light bosonic dark matter using SDSS Lyman-αforest, MNRAS471(2017) 4606 [1703.09126]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [27]

    Zaldarriaga,Searching for Fluctuations in the Intergalactic Medium Temperature Using the Lyα Forest, ApJ564(2002) 153 [astro-ph/0102205]

    M. Zaldarriaga,Searching for Fluctuations in the Intergalactic Medium Temperature Using the Lyα Forest, ApJ564(2002) 153 [astro-ph/0102205]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  27. [28]

    A. A. Meiksin,The physics of the intergalactic medium,Reviews of Modern Physics81(2009) 1405 [0711.3358]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  28. [29]

    Irˇ siˇ c, H

    V. Irˇ siˇ c, H. Xiao and M. McQuinn,Early structure formation constraints on the ultralight axion in the postinflation scenario, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 123518 [1911.11150]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  29. [30]

    K. K. Rogers, C. Dvorkin and H. V. Peiris,Limits on the Light Dark Matter-Proton Cross Section from Cosmic Large-Scale Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 171301 [2111.10386]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [31]

    Villasenor, B

    B. Villasenor, B. Robertson, P. Madau and E. Schneider,New constraints on warm dark matter from the Lyman-αforest power spectrum, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 023502 [2209.14220]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  31. [32]

    Irˇ siˇ c, M

    V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, M. G. Haehnelt, J. S. Bolton, M. Molaro, E. Puchwein et al.,Unveiling Dark Matter free-streaming at the smallest scales with high redshift Lyman-alpha forest,arXiv e-prints(2023) arXiv:2309.04533 [2309.04533]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  32. [33]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. C. Hill, V. Irˇ siˇ c and B. D. Sherwin, Canonical Hubble-Tension-Resolving Early Dark Energy Cosmologies Are Inconsistent with the Lyman-αForest, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 201001 [2303.00746]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  33. [34]

    Gaikwad, R

    P. Gaikwad, R. Srianand, V. Khaire and T. R. Choudhury,Effect of non-equilibrium ionization on derived physical conditions of the high-z intergalactic medium, MNRAS490(2019) 1588 [1812.01016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [35]

    Boera, G

    E. Boera, G. D. Becker, J. S. Bolton and F. Nasir, Revealing Reionization with the Thermal History of the Intergalactic Medium: New Constraints from the Lyα Flux Power Spectrum, ApJ872(2019) 101 [1809.06980]. 13

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [36]

    McQuinn,The Evolution of the Intergalactic Medium, ARA&A54(2016) 313 [1512.00086]

    M. McQuinn,The Evolution of the Intergalactic Medium, ARA&A54(2016) 313 [1512.00086]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [37]

    M. Viel, J. Lesgourgues, M. G. Haehnelt, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto,Can Sterile Neutrinos Be Ruled Out as Warm Dark Matter Candidates?, Phys. Rev. Lett.97 (2006) 071301 [astro-ph/0605706]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  37. [38]

    Walther, J

    M. Walther, J. O˜ norbe, J. F. Hennawi and Z. Luki´ c, New Constraints on IGM Thermal Evolution from the LyαForest Power Spectrum, ApJ872(2019) 13 [1808.04367]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [39]

    J. S. Bolton, M. Viel, T. S. Kim, M. G. Haehnelt and R. F. Carswell,Possible evidence for an inverted temperature-density relation in the intergalactic medium from the flux distribution of the Lyαforest, MNRAS386(2008) 1131 [0711.2064]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  39. [40]

    Garzilli, J

    A. Garzilli, J. S. Bolton, T. S. Kim, S. Leach and M. Viel,The intergalactic medium thermal history at redshift z = 1.7-3.2 from the Lyαforest: a comparison of measurements using wavelets and the flux distribution, MNRAS424(2012) 1723 [1202.3577]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  40. [41]

    N. G. Busca, T. Delubac, J. Rich, S. Bailey, A. Font-Ribera, D. Kirkby et al.,Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Lyαforest of BOSS quasars, A&A 552(2013) A96 [1211.2616]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  41. [42]

    du Mas des Bourboux, J

    H. du Mas des Bourboux, J. Rich, A. Font-Ribera, V. de Sainte Agathe, J. Farr, T. Etourneau et al.,The Completed SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations with LyαForests, ApJ901(2020) 153 [2007.08995]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  42. [43]

    Gaikwad, R

    P. Gaikwad, R. Srianand, M. G. Haehnelt and T. R. Choudhury,A consistent and robust measurement of the thermal state of the IGM at 2≤z≤4 from a large sample of Lyαforest spectra: evidence for late and rapid He II reionization, MNRAS506(2021) 4389 [2009.00016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  43. [44]

    Wilson, V

    B. Wilson, V. Irˇ siˇ c and M. McQuinn,A measurement of the Lyβforest power spectrum and its cross with the Lyαforest in X-Shooter XQ-100, MNRAS509 (2022) 2423 [2106.04837]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [45]

    Villasenor, B

    B. Villasenor, B. Robertson, P. Madau and E. Schneider,Inferring the Thermal History of the Intergalactic Medium from the Properties of the Hydrogen and Helium LyαForest, ApJ933(2022) 59 [2111.00019]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  45. [46]

    McDonald and D

    P. McDonald and D. J. Eisenstein,Dark energy and curvature from a future baryonic acoustic oscillation survey using the Lyman-αforest, Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 063009 [astro-ph/0607122]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  46. [47]

    Slosar, V

    A. Slosar, V. Irˇ siˇ c, D. Kirkby, S. Bailey, N. G. Busca, T. Delubac et al.,Measurement of baryon acoustic oscillations in the Lyman-αforest fluctuations in BOSS data release 9, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2013(2013) 026 [1301.3459]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [48]

    Cuceu et al.,DESI DR1 Lyαforest: 3D full-shape analysis and cosmological constraints,2509.15308

    A. Cuceu et al.,DESI DR1 Lyαforest: 3D full-shape analysis and cosmological constraints,2509.15308

    arXiv

  48. [49]

    J. S. Bolton, E. Puchwein, D. Sijacki, M. G. Haehnelt, T.-S. Kim, A. Meiksin et al.,The Sherwood simulation suite: overview and data comparisons with the Lyman αforest at redshifts 2≤z≤5,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.464(2017) 897 [1605.03462]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [50]

    DESI Collaboration, A. G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D. M. Alexander et al.,DESI 2024 IV: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman Alpha Forest,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2404.03001 [2404.03001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [51]

    tion bias parameter (b η) respectively

    and DESI data [43] and quote them here for complete- ness. tion bias parameter (b η) respectively. Note that model three is closest to observed Ly-αdata for linear bias pa- rametersb 1 andb η. Although the FGPA-based models described in [92] are simplified, they provide an efficient and transpar- ent link between the dark matter and neutral hydro- gen dis...

  51. [52]

    DESI Collaboration, A. G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D. M. Alexander et al.,DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2404.03002 [2404.03002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [53]

    Cuceu, A

    A. Cuceu, A. Font-Ribera, B. Joachimi and S. Nadathur,Cosmology beyond BAO from the 3D distribution of the Lyman-αforest, MNRAS506 (2021) 5439 [2103.14075]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  53. [54]

    Cuceu, A

    A. Cuceu, A. Font-Ribera, S. Nadathur, B. Joachimi and P. Martini,Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion Rate at Redshift 2.3 from the Lyman-αForest, Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 191003 [2209.13942]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  54. [55]

    Gordon, A

    C. Gordon, A. Cuceu, J. Chaves-Montero, A. Font-Ribera, A. Xochitl Gonz´ alez-Morales, J. Aguilar et al.,3D Correlations in the Lyman-α Forest from Early DESI Data,arXiv e-prints(2023) arXiv:2308.10950 [2308.10950]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  55. [56]

    Hadzhiyska, R

    B. Hadzhiyska, R. de Belsunce, A. Cuceu, J. Guy, M. M. Ivanov, H. Coquinot et al.,Measuring and unbiasing the BAO shift in the Lyαforest with ABACUSSUMMIT, MNRAS540(2025) 1960 [2503.13442]. [57]DESIcollaboration,The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design,1611.00036

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [57]

    Luki´ c, C

    Z. Luki´ c, C. W. Stark, P. Nugent, M. White, A. A. Meiksin and A. Almgren,The Lymanαforest in optically thin hydrodynamical simulations, MNRAS 446(2015) 3697 [1406.6361]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  57. [58]

    Chabanier, C

    S. Chabanier, C. Ravoux, L. Latrille, J. Sexton, E. Armengaud, J. Bautista et al.,The ACCEL 2 project: simulating Lyman-αforest in large-volume hydrodynamical simulations,2407.04473

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [59]

    McDonald,Toward a measurement of the cosmological geometry at Z 2: predicting lyman-alpha forest correlation in three dimensions, and the potential of future data sets,Astrophys

    P. McDonald,Toward a measurement of the cosmological geometry at Z 2: predicting lyman-alpha forest correlation in three dimensions, and the potential of future data sets,Astrophys. J.585(2003) 34 [astro-ph/0108064]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  59. [60]

    Arinyo-i Prats, J

    A. Arinyo-i Prats, J. Miralda-Escud´ e, M. Viel and R. Cen,The Non-Linear Power Spectrum of the Lyman Alpha Forest,JCAP12(2015) 017 [1506.04519]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [61]

    Aghamousa, J

    DESI Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. E. Allen et al.,The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design,arXiv e-prints(2016) arXiv:1611.00036 [1611.00036]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  61. [62]

    Schematically, one would first read in all the storedAbacusSummitparticles for each of the simu- lations stored with varying cosmologies and fixed phases

    calibrated on a suite ofAbacusSummitsimula- tions. Schematically, one would first read in all the storedAbacusSummitparticles for each of the simu- lations stored with varying cosmologies and fixed phases. Using the same phase for the initial conditions will yield cosmic variance cancellations when taking derivatives of the power spectrum templates with r...

  62. [63]

    de Belsunce, S.-F

    R. de Belsunce, S.-F. Chen, M. M. Ivanov, C. Ravoux, S. Chabanier, J. Sexton et al.,Precision measurements of EFT parameters and BAO peak shifts for the Lyman-αforest,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 063524 [2412.06892]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [64]

    M. M. Ivanov,Lyman alpha forest power spectrum in effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023507 [2309.10133]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  64. [65]

    McDonald and A

    P. McDonald and A. Roy,Clustering of dark matter tracers: generalizing bias for the coming era of precision LSS,JCAP0908(2009) 020 [0902.0991]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  65. [66]

    Baumann, A

    D. Baumann, A. Nicolis, L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga,Cosmological Non-Linearities as an Effective Fluid,JCAP1207(2012) 051 [1004.2488]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  66. [67]

    J. J. M. Carrasco, M. P. Hertzberg and L. Senatore, The Effective Field Theory of Cosmological Large Scale Structures,JHEP09(2012) 082 [1206.2926]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  67. [68]

    de Belsunce, J

    R. de Belsunce, J. M. Sullivan and P. McDonald,The Compressed 3D Lyman-Alpha Forest Bispectrum, 2510.23597

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [69]

    de Belsunce, M

    R. de Belsunce, M. M. Ivanov, J. M. Sullivan, K. Akitsu and S.-F. Chen,Modeling the Cosmological Lyman-αForest at the Field Level,2507.00284

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [70]

    Baldauf, E

    T. Baldauf, E. Schaan and M. Zaldarriaga,On the reach of perturbative descriptions for dark matter displacement fields,JCAP03(2016) 017 [1505.07098]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  70. [71]

    Baldauf, E

    T. Baldauf, E. Schaan and M. Zaldarriaga,On the reach of perturbative methods for dark matter density fields,JCAP03(2016) 007 [1507.02255]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  71. [72]

    Schmittfull, M

    M. Schmittfull, M. Simonovi´ c, V. Assassi and M. Zaldarriaga,Modeling Biased Tracers at the Field Level,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 043514 [1811.10640]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  72. [73]

    Schmittfull, M

    M. Schmittfull, M. Simonovi´ c, M. M. Ivanov, O. H. E. Philcox and M. Zaldarriaga,Modeling Galaxies in Redshift Space at the Field Level,JCAP05(2021) 059 [2012.03334]. 14

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  73. [74]

    Modi, S.-F

    C. Modi, S.-F. Chen and M. White,Simulations and symmetries, MNRAS492(2020) 5754 [1910.07097]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  74. [75]

    Font-Ribera, P

    A. Font-Ribera, P. McDonald and A. Slosar,How to estimate the 3D power spectrum of the Lyman-αforest, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2018(2018) 003 [1710.11036]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  75. [76]

    de Belsunce, O

    R. de Belsunce, O. H. E. Philcox, V. Irsic, P. McDonald, J. Guy and N. Palanque-Delabrouille, The 3D Lyman-αforest power spectrum from eBOSS DR16,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.533(2024) 3756 [2403.08241]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  76. [77]

    Horowitz, R

    B. Horowitz, R. de Belsunce and Z. Luki´ c,Maximum a posteriori Lyαestimator (MAPLE): band power and covariance estimation of the 3D Lyαforest power spectrum, MNRAS536(2025) 845 [2403.17294]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  77. [78]

    M. M. Pieri, S. Bonoli, J. Chaves-Montero, I. Pˆ aris, M. Fumagalli, J. S. Bolton et al.,WEA VE-QSO: A Massive Intergalactic Medium Survey for the William Herschel Telescope, inSF2A-2016: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics, C. Reyl´ e, J. Richard, L. Cambr´ esy, M. Deleuil, E. P´ econtal, L. Tresse et al....

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [79]

    Greene, R

    J. Greene, R. Bezanson, M. Ouchi, J. Silverman and the PFS Galaxy Evolution Working Group,The Prime Focus Spectrograph Galaxy Evolution Survey,arXiv e-prints(2022) arXiv:2206.14908 [2206.14908]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  79. [80]

    R. S. de Jong, O. Agertz, A. A. Berbel, J. Aird, D. A. Alexander, A. Amarsi et al.,4MOST: Project overview and information for the First Call for Proposals,The Messenger175(2019) 3 [1903.02464]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  80. [81]

    Bernardeau, S

    F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gazta˜ naga and R. Scoccimarro,Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory, Phys. Rep.367 (2002) 1 [astro-ph/0112551]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

Showing first 80 references.