Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Influence of oxygen-defects on intraband terahertz conductivity of carbon nanotubes

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Oxygen defects shrink carrier pathways and shift the terahertz resonance of carbon nanotube films.

desk verdict Honest, well-measured defect study whose quantitative localization lengths rest on an unstated mode velocity; raw trends are real, numbers not yet reproducible. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00512 v1 pith:6KPOSF63 submitted 2025-07-01 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.optics

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics
keywords single-walledcarbonnanotubesterahertzspectroscopyoxygenplasmadefectsintrabandconductivityDrude-Lorentzmodelplasmonresonancecarrierlocalizationwire-gridpolarizer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that oxygen plasma defects are a practical tuning knob for the terahertz response of single-walled carbon nanotube films. Using low- and high-field terahertz spectroscopy on pieces of one film exposed to oxygen plasma for 0 to 90 seconds, the authors watch the same nanotube network as defects accumulate. They find that rising defect density shortens the effective charge-confinement length, moving the plasmon resonance to higher frequencies and lowering intraband conductivity. At strong terahertz fields the response follows an energy-dependent Drude law with scattering rate $\frac{1}{\tau} = A E + \frac{B}{E}$, and the defect-induced changes show up in photoconductivity and in the modeled performance of a terahertz wire-grid polarizer. If correct, defect density becomes a design parameter for nanotube terahertz devices rather than an unavoidable side effect.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Drude–Lorentz conductivity model, $$\$\sigma$(\omega)=\sigma_D\frac{i\gamma_D}{i\gamma_D+\omega}+\sigma_{pl}\frac{i\omega\gamma_{pl}}{i\gamma_{pl}\omega+\$omega^{2}$-\$omega_0^{2}$}+(\sigma_H+A\omega^s),$$ whose Lorentz term carries the defect-shifted plasmon resonance at frequency $\omega_0$. The defect link is made through the relation $\omega_0 = V_q\sqrt{\pi/L_{\rm loc}}$, which turns the fitted resonance position into a charge localization length, and through the Raman defect-density formula $n_d = 1.59\times 10^{10}\,\mathrm{nm}^3\,(I_D/I_G)\,\lambda^{-4}$, which turns the D/G ratio into a mean defect spacing $L_{\rm def}=1/n_d$. At high fields the Drude term is replaced by a Drude-like transport equation with $\frac{1}{\tau}=AE+\frac{B}{E}$, describing hot carriers whose scattering rate depends on the applied field. The mechanism these pieces carry is one-dimensional localization: defects act as barriers that confine carriers, shifting the plasmon response and slowing migration across the network.

What would settle it

Measure the same plasma-treated SWCNT films with an independent, structure-sensitive probe—for example, counting defects per nanotube by aberration-corrected electron microscopy or by length-resolved transport on individual tubes—and compare the resulting defect spacing with the THz-derived localization length. The model predicts a systematic gap ($L_{\rm def} \approx 30$–126 nm versus $L_{\rm loc} \approx 850$–1500 nm) that grows with treatment time; finding the two distances comparable, or finding no monotonic shift of the plasmon resonance with measured defect density, would refute the claim that defects control the intraband THz response.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that oxygen plasma defects make the intraband terahertz conductivity of SWCNT films quantitatively defect-controlled rather than merely degraded. Fitting the complex conductivity to a Drude–Lorentz model with an added Mott-hopping term, the paper finds that plasma-induced defects shorten the conductivity pathways, shifting the axial plasmon resonance toward higher frequencies and reducing the inferred localization length from roughly 1500 nm in the pristine film to 1250–850 nm after 10–90 s of treatment. Raman $I_D/I_G$ data, converted through the empirical defect-density formula, give an effective defect spacing $L_{\rm def}$ that drops to about 30 nm, far shorter than the localization length; the authors interpret the gap as carriers hopping over low potential barriers rather than stopping at every defect. In the high-field regime the conductivity is captured by a modified Drude model with field-dependent scattering rate $\frac{1}{\tau} = A E + \frac{B}{E}$, and defect-rich samples show a monotonically growing scattering rate. The same defect-tuned conductivities enter a finite-difference time-domain model of a wire-grid polarizer, where defects raise the extinction ratio over a wide terahertz band.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative argument rests on the Raman calibration that converts $I_D/I_G$ into a defect density and on the assumption that the fitted plasmon frequency can be converted into a carrier localization length through a fixed mode velocity; if either conversion is off, the absolute numbers of defect spacing and localization length change even if the spectral trends survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Oxygen plasma exposure time becomes a design parameter: increasing defect density from 0 to 90 s shifts the THz plasmon resonance to higher frequencies and lowers intraband conductivity in a controlled way.
  • Raman-derived defect spacing and THz-derived localization length can be combined into a hopping probability estimate, which the paper calculates at about 8.6% for the pristine film falling to about 3.5% for the most defective film.
  • The field-dependent scattering law $\frac{1}{\tau}=AE+\frac{B}{E}$ provides a compact description of nonlinear THz transmission, so saturation behavior of SWCNT films can be modeled with the extracted saturable-absorption parameters.
  • Photoconductivity in defect-rich films is reduced and relaxes faster; even 10 seconds of plasma treatment substantially changes the photoconducting response.
  • Wire-grid polarizer simulations show that defect-tuned films maintain or improve extinction ratio over a broad THz band, while the skin depth under high fields requires thicker wires.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Raman calibration is taken literally, the gap between $L_{\rm def}$ and $L_{\rm loc}$ implies that most defects do not block transport at THz frequencies; the paper's own numbers suggest the mean hopping probability is only a few percent, which would make 'defect-controlled conductivity' a statement about a minority of active barriers.
  • A cleaner separation of end-of-tube confinement from defect confinement would come from samples with controlled nanotube length distributions; the same $\omega_0=V_q\sqrt{\pi/L_{\rm loc}}$ relation predicts that shortening tubes and adding defects should push the resonance in the same direction.
  • The $AE + B/E$ scattering law has a minimum at $E=\sqrt{B/A}$; comparing where that minimum sits for pristine versus defective films would give a distinct, quantitative fingerprint of how defects modify energy relaxation, beyond the monotonic trend reported.
  • The polarizer modeling suggests defects could widen the usable bandwidth or relax thickness constraints, but this depends on the defect-induced conductivity drop remaining within the range simulated here; outside that range the trade-off may reverse.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a systematic experimental study of oxygen-plasma-treated single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) films, combining Raman and optical absorption characterization with low-field, high-field, and optical-pump–terahertz-probe spectroscopy. The central claim is that plasma-induced oxygen defects shorten effective conductivity pathways, shifting the terahertz plasmon resonance to higher frequencies and reducing the inferred localization length from 1500 nm in the pristine film to 850 nm after 90 s of treatment. The authors also propose a field-dependent scattering rate 1/tau = A E + B/E to describe high-field Drude conductivity, report defect-dependent hot-carrier relaxation dynamics, and use the extracted conductivities to simulate wire-grid THz polarizers. The raw spectral trends—monotonic increase of I_D/I_G, shift of the terahertz resonance, and decrease of conductivity with defect density—are directly supported by the measurements. However, several quantitative claims rest on uncalibrated or under-determined conversion steps, especially the extraction of absolute localization lengths from the fitted plasmon frequency.

Significance. If the quantitative framework were fully supported, the paper would establish defect density as a practical tuning parameter for carbon-nanotube THz devices and would provide a useful cross-comparison between Raman-derived defect spacing and THz-derived localization lengths. The experimental design is a strength: all five samples come from one parent film, giving a clean exposure-time series, and the combination of three terahertz techniques with Raman/mid-IR characterization is appropriate. The polarizer modeling, while illustrative rather than validated experimentally, shows a sensible route toward device-level application. The main significance is therefore conditional on resolving the calibration and uncertainty issues in the conversion from fitted plasmon frequencies to localization lengths and in the transfer of a graphene/nanographite Raman defect-density formula to SWCNT films.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (1) and the relation ω = V_q √(π/L_loc)] The quantitative payoff of the paper is the reported localization-length range of 1500–850 nm, but the conversion depends on the mode velocity V_q, which is never given a numerical value, a reference, or an uncertainty estimate. Since L_loc enters inversely as the square of the fitted ω0, a 30% uncertainty in V_q changes L_loc by roughly a factor of 1.8, and the stated range is not reproducible from Fig. S1c alone. The relation also omits the logarithmic geometry/screening factor present in finite-length nanotube plasmon models, so the absolute scale may be systematically biased even if the trend with plasma exposure is correct. Please provide a numeric V_q with justification, report the fitted ω0 values and their uncertainties in a table, and either calibrate the conversion against independent length measurements or present L_loc only as a relative, uncalibrated figure of merit.
  2. [§3.1 and §3.2, Raman defect-density formula] The defect density n_d = 1.59×10^10 nm^3 (I_D/I_G) λ^(-4) was calibrated for graphene and nanographite, but here it is applied to SWCNT films containing a mixture of metallic and semiconducting tubes of ~2 nm mean diameter. The resulting L_def values (roughly 30–126 nm) differ from the THz-derived L_loc values (850–1500 nm) by more than an order of magnitude, and the hopping argument used to reconcile them cannot be tested without independent measurements of tube segment lengths or barrier heights. The authors do acknowledge that L_def is an effective parameter, but the manuscript still uses the absolute L_def values as a quantitative input to the hopping probability estimate. Please either justify the transferability of the calibration to this SWCNT system, provide a bounds analysis for L_def and L_loc, or frame the comparison as qualitative only.
  3. [§3.3, high-field scattering law 1/tau = A E + B/E] The high-field scattering law is a load-bearing element of the paper's central mechanistic claim, but A and B are introduced as fitted constants without reporting their values, uncertainties, or the quality of the complex-conductivity fits at each field strength. The assertion that the plasma-treated sample shows a monotonic increase of the scattering rate with defect density is based on these fits, yet the fits hold the Lorentz and hopping parameters fixed while varying the Drude term, which can absorb systematic errors. Please provide the fitted A and B values, their confidence intervals, a comparison of fit residuals for alternative forms (e.g., pure linear or pure 1/E), and a statement of what independent evidence supports the decomposition into short- and long-range scattering contributions.
  4. [Eq. (1) and Fig. S1, parameter identifiability] Equation (1) contains at least eight free parameters (σ_D, γ_D, σ_pl, γ_pl, ω0, σ_H, A, s), and Fig. S1 reports the fitted values only graphically, without error bars or correlations. Because the Drude, Lorentz, and Mott-hopping terms all contribute to the same measured complex conductivity over the 0.3–3 THz window, it is not demonstrated that ω0 (and hence L_loc) is independently constrained. Please include a parameter table with uncertainties, a discussion of parameter correlations, and a sensitivity analysis showing that the extracted ω0 trend with plasma exposure is not an artifact of fixing the hopping parameters.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (1)] The denominator of the Lorentz term is written as 'iγpω + ω^2 − ω0^2', mixing the symbols γp and γpl; this should be corrected to a single consistent scattering-rate symbol.
  2. [Conclusions, §4] The conclusion states that the scattering rate exhibits 'A/E+BE type behavior', which contradicts the field-dependent law 1/tau = A E + B/E given in §3.3; the formula is also missing parentheses and should be corrected.
  3. [§3.2] The sentence 'Defects also slow down the overall carrier migration within the network, leading to a broadening of the conductivity spectrum and a consequent increase in the electron scattering time' appears to state the opposite of the expected physics: broadening corresponds to an increased scattering rate (shorter scattering time), and Fig. S1b indeed shows increasing γ_D and γ_pl with exposure.
  4. [Introduction and Conclusions] The text describes the study as 'qualitative' while presenting quantitative localization lengths and defect densities; please harmonize the wording or specify which claims are quantitative and which are relative.
  5. [Figure 1 and §3.1] The caption of Fig. 1b and the text refer to the 'further estimation of this length from Raman measurements', but the inset described as 'mid-IR range' in §3.1 is not clearly marked in the figure; adding labels would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central defect-dependent THz conductivity trend rests on independent Raman and THz measurements; fitted parameters are presented as fits, not as derivations from themselves.

full rationale

The paper's core observation—a monotonic increase in the ID/IG ratio and a defect-dependent shift of the THz plasmon resonance with plasma exposure—comes from two independent spectroscopies and is not derived from the model. Equation (1) is an explicit fit to the complex conductivity spectra; the paper labels its outputs as 'fitting parameters' (Fig. S1) and 'estimated' localization lengths, not as predictions. The conversion omega0 to L_loc via omega = V_q sqrt(pi/L_loc) is model-dependent and the numerical value of V_q is not given, so the absolute 1250-850 nm scale is underdetermined; however, this is a calibration/assumption issue, not a circular reduction, because L_loc is not defined by the target conclusion and the qualitative resonance shift is measured directly. Similarly, the high-field result 1/tau = A E + B/E is obtained by fitting constants A and B to the extracted scattering rates, and the authors explicitly state that rigorous theoretical treatment is future work; the saturable transmission parameters and relaxation lifetimes are likewise fits to data. Self-citations ([38], [62]) support the experimental setup and a physical interpretation but do not carry the central defect-conductivity claim, and the Raman defect calibration is cited to external work [48]. The paper itself flags L_def as an 'effective parameter', acknowledging the limitation. No step therefore reduces by construction to its own input, so no circular step is established.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on a chain of fitted parameters and borrowed calibrations. The most fragile links are the transfer of a graphene Raman defect formula to SWCNTs, the conversion of a fitted plasmon frequency into a localization length, and the empirical high-field scattering law. No new physical entities apart from the fitted scattering decomposition are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • Drude parameters sigma_D and gamma_D = not tabulated in text
    Fitted per sample from low-field terahertz conductivity spectra using Eq. 1; used to extract carrier scattering and infer defect effects.
  • Plasmon parameters sigma_pl, gamma_pl, omega_0 = omega_0 shifts with plasma treatment; values summarized in Fig. S1
    Fitted Lorentz term; omega_0 is inverted into localization length L_loc via omega_0 = V_q sqrt(pi/L_loc).
  • Mott hopping constants sigma_H, A, s = not tabulated in text
    Extra conductivity term in Eq. 1; tuned per sample to describe junction hopping.
  • High-field scattering law constants A and B = not tabulated in text
    Fit of 1/tau = A E + B/E to field-dependent scattering rates; the text says rigorous treatment is future work.
  • Saturable transmission parameters E_sat, T_lin, T_ns = E_sat = 21 kV/cm pristine and 26 kV/cm treated; T_lin and T_ns given in Fig. 4a
    Phenomenological fit of Eq. 2 to high-field transmission data.
  • Bi-exponential decay amplitudes and time constants A1, A2, t1, t2 = t1 around 1 to 3 ps; t2 around 10 ps reported only for pristine; values in Fig. S2
    Fit to optical pump-terahertz probe transients; used to claim defect-dependent relaxation dynamics.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Tinkham thin-film equation correctly gives complex conductivity from transmission measurements.
    Assumed in the Methods section; standard for thin films but requires known film thickness and substrate properties.
  • domain assumption Eq. 1 with Drude, Lorentz, and Mott hopping terms fully describes intraband terahertz conductivity of SWCNT networks.
    Borrowed from reference [54]; the paper does not independently validate that all terms are identifiable from these spectra.
  • ad hoc to paper The Raman defect density formula n_d = 1.59e10 nm^3 (I_D/I_G) lambda^-4, calibrated on graphene and nanographite, applies to SWCNT films and gives L_def = 1/n_d.
    The authors apply this formula to carbon nanotubes and call L_def an effective parameter; it is load-bearing for the defect-spacing comparison.
  • domain assumption Plasmon frequency is related to localization length by omega_0 = V_q sqrt(pi/L_loc), with mode velocity V_q proportional to Fermi velocity and diameter.
    Used in Section 3.2 to convert fitted omega_0 into L_loc values from 850 to 1500 nm.
  • ad hoc to paper High-field terahertz response can be described by a heated Fermi-Dirac electron distribution and an empirical 1/tau = A E + B/E scattering law.
    The scattering law is fitted, not derived; the text states that rigorous theoretical treatment is a topic of future work.
  • domain assumption 400 nm excitation is off-resonance for most nanotubes and creates free carriers described by the difference of two Drude terms.
    The optical pump-terahertz probe analysis fits photoconductivity as the difference of ON and OFF Drude terms with an unchanged Lorentz term.
invented entities (1)
  • Short-range and long-range scattering contributions A*E and B/E
    purpose: To explain the measured field dependence of the scattering rate 1/tau(E) in high-field terahertz experiments.
    This decomposition is a curve fit of the measured scattering rate. The paper provides no microscopic calculation or independent observable that identifies A and B with distinct physical mechanisms, so it functions as a postulated model component.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Influence of oxygen-defects on intraband terahertz conductivity of carbon nanotubes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6KPOSF63

@misc{pith2026250700512,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Influence of oxygen-defects on intraband terahertz conductivity of carbon nanotubes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6KPOSF63}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00512}
}
read the original abstract

The exceptional charge transport properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) enable numerous ultrafast optoelectronic applications. Modifying SWCNTs by introducing defects significantly impacts the performance of nanotube-based devices, making defect characterization crucial. This research tracked these effects in oxygen plasma-treated SWCNT thin films. Sub-picosecond electric fields of varying strengths and additional photoexcitation were used to assess how defects influence charge carrier transport. Changes in effective conductivity within the terahertz (THz) range were found to be strongly dependent on impurity levels. The plasmon resonance shift to higher THz frequencies aligns with the defect-induced reduction in conductivity and slowed carrier migration within the network. An increase in THz field strength resulted in diminished conductivity due to intraband absorption bleaching. To address the emergence of hot charge carriers, a modified Drude model, which considers non-equilibrium charge carrier distribution via fielddependent scattering rates, was applied. The dominant charge-impurity scattering rate in plasma-treated samples corresponded with an increase in defects. Additionally, the impact of defects on charge carrier dynamics on a picosecond timescale was examined. The modeled plasma-treated SWCNTs wire-grid polarizer for the THz range reveals the potential for multi-level engineering of THz devices to customize properties through controlled defect populations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00512 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a) The THz pulse applied to SWCNTs induces a current j, which emits an additional field proportional to the time–derivative of the initial field. The superposition of the initial and emitted fields results in the reduction of the resultant pulse, which can be backtracked to determine the conductivity of the material. The influence of field strength and defects can be examined. b) Illustration of localization of a ch… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Characterization of the plasma-treated SWCNT thin films. The Raman (a) and absorbance (b) spectra of pristine (pink) and plasma–treated samples of SWCNTs with exposure times of 10, 30, 60 and 90 s. c) The gradual increase in the Raman peak intensity ratio ID/IG with the change of the plasma exposure time. The inserts show the empirical expression for the calculation of the defect density and the illustration of the … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Frequency-dependent conductivity of the studied samples at low and high field–strength (colors correspond to different plasma exposures similaraly to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) THz power transmission fitted by the eq. 5. The scattering time for pristine (b) and plasma-treated defective SWCNTs (90 s) (d) versus the electric field. The contribution from short- (brown) and long-range scattering (green) is highlighted by dash lines. (c) The c…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: a) The transient of the real part of ∆E/E for all samples at a fluence 255 µJ/cm2 and for pristine and treated during 10, 60, and 90 s by plasma samples. b) The transients for pristine and 90 s plasma-treated sample at different fluences ranging from 102–255 µJ/cm2 . D…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Simulated extinction ratio at 1 THz as a function of filling factor (w/s) (a, d), period of the polarizator (w + s) (b, e) and its thickness (c, f) at low and high applied electric fields at the top and bottom. 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 1 Extinction ratio (%) Frequency (THz)…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Simulated extinction ratio of SWCNT film polarizer over a broad spectral range at different parameters. Captions denote the filling factor, period and thickness, respectively. (b) The transmission spectra in parallel and perpendicular directions calculated by subst…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Q. Zhou, Q. Qiu, Z. Huang, Graphene-based terahertz optoelectronics, Optics and Laser Technology 157 (2023) 108558.doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108558. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108558

  2. [2]

    M. G. Burdanova, G. M. Katyba, R. Kashtiban, G. A. Komandin, E. Butler-Caddle, M. Staniforth, A.A.Mkrtchyan, D.V.Krasnikov, Y.G.Gladush, J.Sloan, A.G.Nasibulin, J.Lloyd-Hughes, Ultrafast, high modulation depth terahertz modulators based on carbon nanotube thin films, Carbon 173 (2021) 245–252.doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.008. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/...

  3. [3]

    Zhang, E

    Q. Zhang, E. H. H´ aroz, Z. Jin, L. Ren, X. Wang, R. S. Arvidson, A. L¨ uttge, J. Kono, Plasmonic nature of the terahertz conductivity peak in single-wall carbon nanotubes, Nano Letters 13 (12) (2013) 5991–5996.doi:10.1021/nl403175g. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl403175g

  4. [4]

    Y. Wang, G. Sun, X. Zhang, X. Zhang, Z. cui, Advancement in carbon nanotubes optoelectronic devices for terahertz and infrared applications, Advanced Electronic Materials (Jul. 2024).doi:10.1002/aelm. 202400124. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202400124

  5. [5]

    M. He, D. Li, T. Yang, D. Shang, A. I. Chernov, P. V. Fedotov, E. D. Obraztsova, Q. Liu, H. Jiang, E. Kauppinen, A robust coxmg1-xo catalyst for predominantly growing (6, 5) single-walled carbon nanotubes, Carbon 153 (2019) 389–395.doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2019.07.050. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.07.050

  6. [7]

    Jeon, K.-J

    T.-I. Jeon, K.-J. Kim, C. Kang, S.-J. Oh, J.-H. Son, K. H. An, D. J. Bae, Y. H. Lee, Terahertz conductivity of anisotropic single walled carbon nanotube films, Applied Physics Letters 80 (18) (2002) 3403–3405.doi:10.1063/1.1476713. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1476713

  7. [8]

    K. V. Voronin, G. A. Ermolaev, M. G. Burdanova, A. S. Slavich, A. N. Toksumakov, D. I. Yakubovsky, M. I. Paukov, Y. Xie, L. Qian, D. S. Kopylova, D. V. Krasnikov, D. A. Ghazaryan, D. G. Baranov, A. I. Chernov, A. G. Nasibulin, J. Zhang, A. V. Arsenin, V. Volkov, Programmable carbon nanotube networks: Controlling optical properties through orientation and ...

  8. [9]

    G. A. Ermolaev, Y. Xie, L. Qian, M. K. Tatmyshevskiy, A. S. Slavich, A. V. Arsenin, J. Zhang, V. S. Volkov, A. I. Chernov, Anisotropic optical properties of monolayer aligned single-walled carbon nanotubes, physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters 18 (4) (Aug. 2023).doi:10.1002/ pssr.202300199. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pssr.202300199

Show all 61 references
  1. [10]

    A.Baydin, N.Komatsu, F.Tay, S.Ghosh, T.Makihara, G.T.Noe, J.Kono, Giantterahertzpolarization rotation in ultrathin films of aligned carbon nanotubes, Optica 8 (5) (2021) 760.doi:10.1364/optica. 422826. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.422826

  2. [11]

    M. G. Burdanova, A. P. Tsapenko, D. A. Satco, R. Kashtiban, C. D. W. Mosley, M. Monti, M. Stan- iforth, J. Sloan, Y. G. Gladush, A. G. Nasibulin, J. Lloyd-Hughes, Giant negative terahertz photo- conductivity in controllably doped carbon nanotube networks, ACS Photonics 6 (4) (...

  3. [12]

    M. G. Burdanova, A. P. Tsapenko, M. V. Kharlamova, E. I. Kauppinen, B. P. Gorshunov, J. Kono, J. Lloyd-Hughes, A review of the terahertz conductivity and photoconductivity of carbon nanotubes and heteronanotubes, Advanced Optical Materials 9 (24) (Sep. 2021).doi:10.1002/adom.2...

  4. [13]

    S.-T. Xu, S. Chen, L.-L. Mou, F. Fan, Z.-F. Liu, S.-J. Chang, Carbon nanotube attached subwavelength grating for broadband terahertz polarization conversion and dispersion control, Carbon 139 (2018) 801–807.doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2018.07.050. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbo...

  5. [14]

    M. I. Paukov, V. V. Starchenko, D. V. Krasnikov, G. A. Komandin, Y. G. Gladush, S. S. Zhukov, B. P. Gorshunov, A. G. Nasibulin, A. V. Arsenin, V. S. Volkov, M. G. Burdanova, Ultrafast optomechanical terahertz modulators based on stretchable carbon nanotube thin films, Ultrafas...

  6. [15]

    G. M. Katyba, N. I. Raginov, E. M. Khabushev, V. A. Zhelnov, A. Gorodetsky, D. A. Ghazaryan, M. S. Mironov, D. V. Krasnikov, Y. G. Gladush, J. Lloyd-Hughes, A. G. Nasibulin, A. V. Arsenin, V. S. Volkov, K. I. Zaytsev, M. G. Burdanova, Tunable thz flat zone plate based on stret...

  7. [16]

    A. V. Radivon, G. M. Katyba, N. I. Raginov, A. V. Chernykh, A. S. Ezerskii, E. G. Tsiplakova, I. I. Rakov, M. I. Paukov, V. V. Starchenko, A. V. Arsenin, I. E. Spector, K. I. Zaytsev, D. V. Krasnikov, N.V.Petrov, A.G.Nasibulin, V.Volkov, M.G.Burdanova, Expandingthzvortexgenera...

  8. [17]

    I. V. Novikov, D. V. Krasnikov, I. H. Lee, E. E. Agafonova, S. I. Serebrennikova, Y. Lee, S. Kim, J. Nam, V. A. Kondrashov, J. Han, I. I. Rakov, A. G. Nasibulin, I. Jeon, Aerosol cvd carbon nanotube thin films: From synthesis to advanced applications: A comprehensive review, A...

  9. [19]

    Banerjee, A

    S. Banerjee, A. Chaudhuri, K. Chakrabarty, Analysis of the impact of process variations and manu- facturing defects on the performance of carbon-nanotube fets, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems 28 (6) (2020) 1513–1526.doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2020.29767...

  10. [20]

    Del Canto, K

    E. Del Canto, K. Flavin, D. Movia, C. Navio, C. Bittencourt, S. Giordani, Critical investigation of defect site functionalization on single-walled carbon nanotubes, Chemistry of Materials 23 (1) (2010) 67–74.doi:10.1021/cm101978m. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm101978m

  11. [21]

    Hirsch, O

    A. Hirsch, O. Vostrowsky, Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005, p. 193–237.doi:10.1007/b98169. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b98169

  12. [22]

    B. J. Gifford, S. Kilina, H. Htoon, S. K. Doorn, S. Tretiak, Controlling defect-state photophysics in covalently functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes, Accounts of Chemical Research 53 (9) (2020) 1791–1801.doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00210. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/...

  13. [23]

    X. He, N. F. Hartmann, X. Ma, Y. Kim, R. Ihly, J. L. Blackburn, W. Gao, J. Kono, Y. Yomogida, A. Hirano, T. Tanaka, H. Kataura, H. Htoon, S. K. Doorn, Tunable room-temperature single-photon emission at telecom wavelengths from sp3 defects in carbon nanotubes, Nature Photonics ...

  14. [24]

    Zanolli, J.-C

    Z. Zanolli, J.-C. Charlier, Defective carbon nanotubes for single-molecule sensing, Physical Review B 80 (15) (Oct. 2009).doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.155447. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.155447

  15. [25]

    A. I. Chernov, V. A. Eremina, J. Shook, A. Collins, P. Walker, P. V. Fedotov, A. A. Zakhidov, E. D. Obraztsova, Field effect transistor based on solely semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes for the detection of 2-chlorophenol, physica status solidi (b) 255 (1) (Jul. 20...

  16. [26]

    T. N. Kurtukova, D. S. Kopylova, N. I. Raginov, E. M. Khabushev, I. V. Novikov, S. I. Serebrennikova, D. V. Krasnikov, A. G. Nasibulin, Plasma-treated carbon nanotubes for fast infrared bolometers, Ap- plied Physics Letters 122 (9) (Feb. 2023).doi:10.1063/5.0140030. URLhttp://...

  17. [27]

    S. A. Reyes, A. Struck, S. Eggert, Lattice defects and boundaries in conducting carbon nanotubes, Physical Review B 80 (7) (Aug. 2009).doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.075115. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.075115

  18. [28]

    Zheng, N

    W. Zheng, N. F. Zorn, M. Bonn, J. Zaumseil, H. I. Wang, Probing carrier dynamics in sp3-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes with time-resolved terahertz spectroscopy, ACS Nano 16 (6) (2022) 9401–9409.doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c02199. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c02199

  19. [29]

    Lauret, C

    J.-S. Lauret, C. Voisin, G. Cassabois, C. Delalande, P. Roussignol, O. Jost, L. Capes, Ultrafast carrier dynamics in single-wall carbon nanotubes, Physical Review Letters 90 (5) (Feb. 2003).doi:10.1103/ physrevlett.90.057404. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.057404

  20. [30]

    Karlsen, M

    P. Karlsen, M. V. Shuba, C. Beckerleg, D. I. Yuko, P. P. Kuzhir, S. A. Maksimenko, V. Ksenevich, H. Viet, A. G. Nasibulin, R. Tenne, E. Hendry, Influence of nanotube length and density on the plasmonic terahertz response of single-walled carbon nanotubes, Journal of Physics D:...

  21. [31]

    S. Kar, A. Sood, Ultrafast terahertz photoresponse of single and double-walled carbon nanotubes: Optical pump-terahertz probe spectroscopy, Carbon 144 (2019) 731–736.doi:10.1016/j.carbon. 2018.12.081. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.12.081

  22. [32]

    J. C. Johannsen, S. Ulstrup, F. Cilento, A. Crepaldi, M. Zacchigna, C. Cacho, I. C. E. Turcu, E. Springate, F. Fromm, C. Raidel, T. Seyller, F. Parmigiani, M. Grioni, P. Hofmann, Direct view of hot carrier dynamics in graphene, Physical Review Letters 111 (2) (Jul. 2013).doi:1...

  23. [33]

    C. J. Docherty, C.-T. Lin, H. J. Joyce, R. J. Nicholas, L. M. Herz, L.-J. Li, M. B. Johnston, Extreme sensitivity of graphene photoconductivity to environmental gases, Nature Communications 3 (1) (Nov. 2012).doi:10.1038/ncomms2235. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2235 15

  24. [34]

    E. M. Khabushev, D. V. Krasnikov, O. T. Zaremba, A. P. Tsapenko, A. E. Goldt, A. G. Nasibulin, Machine learning for tailoring optoelectronic properties of single-walled carbon nanotube films, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 10 (21) (2019) 6962–6966.doi:10.1021/acs.jp...

  25. [35]

    E. M. Khabushev, D. V. Krasnikov, J. V. Kolodiazhnaia, A. V. Bubis, A. G. Nasibulin, Structure- dependent performance of single-walled carbon nanotube films in transparent and conductive applica- tions, Carbon 161 (2020) 712–717.doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.068. URLhttps://doi...

  26. [36]

    A. G. Nasibulin, A. Moisala, D. P. Brown, H. Jiang, E. Kauppinen, A novel aerosol method for single walled carbon nanotube synthesis, Chemical Physics Letters 402 (1-3) (2005) 227–232.doi:10.1016/ j.cplett.2004.12.040

  27. [37]

    G. A. Komandin, A. A. Gavdush, Y. G. Goncharov, O. E. Porodinkov, V. S. Nozdrin, S. V. Chuchupal, I. E. Spektor, Electrodynamical characteristics of –lactose monohydrate in the terahertz range, Optics and Spectroscopy 126 (5) (2019) 514–522.doi:10.1134/s0030400x1905014x. URLht...

  28. [38]

    Burdanova, E

    M. Burdanova, E. Chiglintsev, M. Paukov, P. Mishra, K. Brekhov, A. Arsenin, V. Volkov, A. Cher- nov, High-field terahertz time-domain spectroscopy of single-walled carbon nanotubes (2023).doi: 10.18721/JPM.161.318. URLhttps://physmath.spbstu.ru/en/article/2023.65.18/

  29. [39]

    Lloyd-Hughes, T.-I

    J. Lloyd-Hughes, T.-I. Jeon, A review of the terahertz conductivity of bulk and nano-materials, Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves 33 (9) (2012) 871–925.doi:10.1007/ s10762-012-9905-y. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10762-012-9905-y

  30. [40]

    H. J. Joyce, J. L. Boland, C. L. Davies, S. A. Baig, M. B. Johnston, A review of the electrical properties of semiconductor nanowires: insights gained from terahertz conductivity spectroscopy, Semiconductor Science and Technology 31 (10) (2016) 103003.doi:10.1088/0268-1242/31/...

  31. [41]

    Dresselhaus, G

    M. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, R. Saito, Physics of carbon nanotubes, Carbon 33 (7) (1995) 883–891. doi:10.1016/0008-6223(95)00017-8. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(95)00017-8

  32. [42]

    Jorio, R

    A. Jorio, R. Saito, Raman spectroscopy for carbon nanotube applications, Journal of Applied Physics 129 (2) (Jan. 2021).doi:10.1063/5.0030809. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0030809

  33. [43]

    L. G. Can¸ cado, K. Takai, T. Enoki, M. Endo, Y. A. Kim, H. Mizusaki, A. Jorio, L. N. Coelho, R. Magalh˜ aes-Paniago, M. A. Pimenta, General equation for the determination of the crystallite size la of nanographite by raman spectroscopy, Applied Physics Letters 88 (16) (Apr. 2...

  34. [44]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, A. Jorio, A. G. Souza Filho, R. Saito, Defect characterization in graphene and carbon nanotubes using raman spectroscopy, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 368 (1932) (2010) 5355–5377.doi:10.10...

  35. [45]

    V. L. Kuznetsov, S. N. Bokova-Sirosh, S. I. Moseenkov, A. V. Ishchenko, D. V. Krasnikov, M. A. Kazakova, A. I. Romanenko, E. N. Tkachev, E. D. Obraztsova, Raman spectra for characterization of defective cvd multi-walled carbon nanotubes, physica status solidi (b) 251 (12) (201...

  36. [46]

    W. A. Saidi, Effects of topological defects and diatom vacancies on characteristic vibration modes and raman intensities of zigzag single-walled carbon nanotubes, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 118 (35) (2013) 7235–7241.doi:10.1021/jp409209s. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/...

  37. [47]

    Z. X. Guo, J. W. Ding, Y. Xiao, D. Y. Xing, Raman frequency shift in oxygen-functionalized carbon nanotubes, Nanotechnology 18 (46) (2007) 465706.doi:10.1088/0957-4484/18/46/465706. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/18/46/465706

  38. [48]

    J. Wang, M. J. Shea, J. T. Flach, T. J. McDonough, A. J. Way, M. T. Zanni, M. S. Arnold, Role of defects as exciton quenching sites in carbon nanotube photovoltaics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 121 (15) (2017) 8310–8318.doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01005. URLhttp://dx.doi.or...

  39. [49]

    X. Ma, L. Adamska, H. Yamaguchi, S. E. Yalcin, S. Tretiak, S. K. Doorn, H. Htoon, Electronic structure andchemicalnatureofoxygendopantstatesincarbonnanotubes, ACSNano8(10)(2014)10782–10789. doi:10.1021/nn504553y. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nn504553y

  40. [50]

    K. K. Kim, J. J. Bae, H. K. Park, S. M. Kim, H.-Z. Geng, K. A. Park, H.-J. Shin, S.-M. Yoon, A. Benayad, J.-Y. Choi, Y. H. Lee, Fermi level engineering of single-walled carbon nanotubes by aucl3 doping, Journal of the American Chemical Society 130 (38) (2008) 12757–12761.doi:1...

  41. [51]

    Bantignies, J.-L

    J.-L. Bantignies, J.-L. Sauvajol, A. Rahmani, E. Flahaut, Infrared-active phonons in carbon nanotubes, Physical Review B 74 (19) (Nov. 2006).doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.195425. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.195425

  42. [52]

    K. Sbai, A. Rahmani, H. Chadli, J.-L. Bantignies, P. Hermet, J.-L. Sauvajol, Infrared spectroscopy of single-walled carbon nanotubes, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 110 (25) (2006) 12388–12393. doi:10.1021/jp0574504. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp0574504

  43. [53]

    URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01827

    Y.Zheng, S.M.Bachilo, R.B.Weisman, Tailoringthepropertiesofsingle-wallcarbonnanotubesamples through structure-selective near-infrared photochemistry, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 11 (16) (2020) 6492–6497.doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01827. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.102...

  44. [54]

    Gorshunov, E

    B. Gorshunov, E. Zhukova, J. Starovatykh, M. Belyanchikov, A. Grebenko, A. Bubis, V. Tsebro, A. Tonkikh, D. Rybkovskiy, A. Nasibulin, E. Kauppinen, E. Obraztsova, Terahertz spectroscopy of charge transport in films of pristine and doped single-wall carbon nanotubes, Carbon 126...

  45. [55]

    Mics, K.-J

    Z. Mics, K.-J. Tielrooij, K. Parvez, S. A. Jensen, I. Ivanov, X. Feng, K. M¨ ullen, M. Bonn, D. Turchi- novich, Thermodynamic picture of ultrafast charge transport in graphene, Nature Communications 6 (1) (Jul. 2015).doi:10.1038/ncomms8655. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8655

  46. [56]

    Hirtschulz, F

    M. Hirtschulz, F. Milde, E. Malic, C. Thomsen, S. Reich, A. Knorr, Theory of ultrafast intraband relaxation in carbon nanotubes, physica status solidi (b) 245 (10) (2008) 2164–2168.doi:10.1002/ pssb.200879583. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pssb.200879583 17

  47. [57]

    H. Y. Hwang, N. C. Brandt, H. Farhat, A. L. Hsu, J. Kong, K. A. Nelson, Nonlinear thz conduc- tivity dynamics in p-type cvd-grown graphene, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 117 (49) (2013) 15819–15824.doi:10.1021/jp407548a. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp407548a

  48. [58]

    Perfetti, T

    L. Perfetti, T. Kampfrath, F. Schapper, A. Hagen, T. Hertel, C. M. Aguirre, P. Desjardins, R. Martel, C. Frischkorn, M. Wolf, Ultrafast dynamics of delocalized and localized electrons in carbon nanotubes, Physical Review Letters 96 (2) (Jan. 2006).doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.02...

  49. [59]

    Kampfrath, L

    T. Kampfrath, L. Perfetti, F. Schapper, C. Frischkorn, M. Wolf, Strongly coupled optical phonons in the ultrafast dynamics of the electronic energy and current relaxation in graphite, Physical Review Letters 95 (18) (Oct. 2005).doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.187403. URLhttp://dx.d...

  50. [60]

    X. Xu, K. Chuang, R. J. Nicholas, M. B. Johnston, L. M. Herz, Terahertz excitonic response of isolated single-walled carbon nanotubes, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 113 (42) (2009) 18106–18109. doi:10.1021/jp907195t. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp907195t

  51. [61]

    F. Wang, G. Dukovic, E. Knoesel, L. E. Brus, T. F. Heinz, Observation of rapid auger recombination in optically excited semiconducting carbon nanotubes, Physical Review B 70 (24) (Dec. 2004).doi: 10.1103/physrevb.70.241403. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.70.241403

  52. [62]

    M. I. Paukov, S. Sun, A. A. Vorfolomeeva, A. V. Syuy, R. I. Romanov, M. S. Mironov, A. A. Vysh- nevyy, G. A. Komandin, L. G. Bulusheva, A. V. Okotrub, A. V. Arsenin, V. Volkov, Y. Zhang, M. G. Burdanova, Exploring stable hot carrier multiplication in filled carbon nanotubes, C...

  53. [63]

    G. Li, K. Montazeri, M. K. Ismail, M. W. Barsoum, B. Nabet, L. V. Titova, Terahertz polarizers based on 2d ti3c2tz mxene: Spin cast from aqueous suspensions, Advanced Photonics Research 1 (2) (Nov. 2020).doi:10.1002/adpr.202000084. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adpr.202000084 1...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.