A Non-Inflationary Axion and ALP Misalignment Mechanism

Robert Brandenberger (McGill University)

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

A Non-Inflationary Axion and ALP Misalignment Mechanism

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes that Planck-suppressed global symmetry breaking, mediated by a thermalized hidden-sector field, can replace inflation as the source of late-time coherent axion and ALP oscillations.

desk verdict A novel but undemonstrated mechanism; the advertised freeze likely fails because the thermal restoring force is too weak to overcome Hubble friction. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00785 v1 pith:NY77WQ5D submitted 2025-07-01 hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th

Robert Brandenberger (McGill University) This is my paper

classification hep-phastro-ph.COgr-qchep-th

keywords axionaxion-likeparticlesmisalignmentmechanismPlanck-suppressedsymmetrybreakingcoherentoscillationsdarkmatterearlyuniversecosmologythermalpotential

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Axions and ALPs are usually assumed to start oscillating because inflation smoothed their angular field and left it displaced from the potential minimum. This paper argues that Planck-suppressed violations of the global U(1) symmetry behind axions can do the same job without inflation: a high-temperature potential sets the axion angle to a fixed value, Hubble friction holds it there while the universe cools, and when the Hubble rate drops to the axion mass the field begins coherent oscillations about the true minimum. If correct, the mechanism supplies the misalignment needed for axion and ALP dark matter in bouncing, emergent, or other non-inflationary cosmologies, and ties the initial amplitude to a Planck-scale phase rather than to inflationary fluctuations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the temperature-dependent potential of Eq. (8), $V_T(T,\theta) = \frac{T^{2+2n}}{m_{\rm pl}^{2n}} f_a^2 [1-\cos(\theta+\beta)]$. It is obtained by coupling the axion phase $\theta$ to a hidden-sector field $\chi$ through the interaction (9) and integrating out $\chi$ in thermal equilibrium with a self-interaction $V_\chi = \lambda_\chi \chi^4$, where $\lambda_\chi \sim 1$. At high temperature this potential pins $\theta$ to $-\beta$; combined with the low-temperature instanton potential (4), the total potential (12) has a minimum that slides from $-\beta$ to $0$ as the universe cools. The mechanism's key dynamical step is the paper's assertion that Hubble friction keeps $\theta$ frozen at $-\beta$ while the minimum moves, releasing the field into coherent oscillations only when $H(T) = m_a$.

What would settle it

Solving the equation of motion for $\theta$ with the total potential (12) in a radiation-dominated background and showing that $\theta$ remains within roughly $1/H$ of the instantaneous minimum until $H = m_a$ would falsify the mechanism, as would a derivation showing that $\chi$ drops out of thermal equilibrium before the misalignment is set.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the same Planck-suppressed global-symmetry violations that threaten axion quality can be turned into a working misalignment mechanism, provided they act through the temperature-dependent potential $V_T(T,\theta) = \frac{T^{2+2n}}{m_{\rm pl}^{2n}} f_a^2 [1-\cos(\theta+\beta)]$ while the radial mode is frozen at $|\phi|=f_a$. At high temperature this potential pins $\theta$ to $-\beta$. As the universe cools, the low-temperature instanton potential $\delta V_l = \frac12 m_a^2 f_a^2 \theta^2$ gradually shifts the minimum from $-\beta$ to $0$, but Hubble friction keeps $\theta$ at $-\beta$ until $H(T)=m_a$. Then $\theta$ begins coherent oscillations about $\theta=0$ across cosmological scales. The paper argues that this yields the late-time coherent axion and ALP oscillations normally attributed to inflation, without needing an inflationary phase.

Load-bearing premise

The mechanism assumes a hidden-sector field $\chi$ with $\lambda_\chi \sim 1$ stays in thermal equilibrium and is coupled to the axion phase only through the Planck-suppressed interaction (9), while Hubble friction keeps $\theta$ fixed at $-\beta$ as the potential minimum slides to $0$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the mechanism works, axion and ALP dark matter can be produced without an inflationary epoch, so the usual reliance on inflation for the initial misalignment is removed.
The same Planck-suppressed terms set the initial angle to $-\beta$, so the late-time axion abundance is determined by the unknown phase $\beta$ rather than by the random value drawn during inflation.
For the QCD axion, the axion-quality bound requires $n\ge 6$, which weakens the high-temperature potential; the mechanism is therefore most effective for ALPs with $n=1$.
Thermal fluctuations do not spoil the coherence: on large scales the fluctuation amplitude falls as $R^{-3/2}$, and the scale above which fluctuations are suppressed is given by Eq. (15).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The freeze condition deserves a direct check: with $n=1$, $m_\theta^2 \sim T^4/m_{\rm pl}^2$ is comparable to $H^2$, so solving the full $\theta$ equation of motion in a radiation-dominated background is a sharper test of whether the field really stays at $-\beta$ rather than tracking the moving minimum.
A concrete model-building requirement left implicit in the paper is that the hidden-sector field $\chi$ remains in thermal equilibrium down to the temperatures where the misalignment is set; quantifying this for a reheating history would make the mechanism predictive.
One observational imprint of this mechanism, if it holds, is a fixed initial misalignment angle in every Hubble patch, in contrast to the order-one spatial randomness expected from inflationary fluctuations; searches for correlations or isocurvature in the ALP field could distinguish the two cases.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Brandenberger proposes a new way to get large-scale coherent axion oscillations without inflation: a Planck-suppressed coupling to a thermal hidden sector gives the angular field a high-temperature minimum at θ = −β, and when the minimum later relaxes to 0, Hubble friction keeps θ frozen until the ALP mass turns on. The combination is new relative to the cited literature, and the motivation from axion quality is sensible. The paper is short and clearly written, and there is no circular fitting: β is an input phase, not a derived prediction.

The problem is the central dynamical step. The thermal potential (8) is Planck-suppressed, and for the simplest case n = 1 gives m_θ² ∼ T⁴/M_pl². During radiation domination H² ∼ T⁴/M_pl², so the angular field is critically damped at best; the relaxation rate toward θ = −β is Γ ≈ H/(3c²) ≪ H for g* ≳ 10. Starting from the Kibble-random phase at the PQ transition, θ cannot approach −β in a Hubble time. The same Planck suppression that makes the late-time potential weak makes the early-time restoring force too weak to fight Hubble friction. For n > 1 the situation is worse. The text simply asserts that thermal effects localize θ at −β and that Hubble friction freezes it there; it never compares m_θ² with H². That is the load-bearing step, and the stress-test calculation shows it does not hold as written.

There is also a smaller issue: Eq. (12) writes the low-temperature term as 1/2 m_a² θ², while Eq. (4) has 1/2 m_a² f_a² θ². That f_a² is probably just a typo, but it changes the location of the minimum during the shift and should be fixed.

If the author can identify a physically motivated regime where the thermal minimum is actually reached—say, a non-Planck-suppressed mediator or a steeper T-dependence that makes m_θ > H—the idea could be revived. As it stands, the mechanism is an attractive proposal with an unproven, and likely wrong, core. I would still send it to peer review: the question is important for non-inflationary cosmologies and the flaw is concrete enough for a referee to pin down. I just would not cite it as a working mechanism until the dynamics are shown.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a novel, non-inflationary misalignment mechanism for axions and ALPs. Quantum-gravity-induced, Planck-suppressed terms explicitly break the global U(1) symmetry and, through a hidden-sector scalar chi, generate a high-temperature effective potential (Eq. (8)) that is claimed to localize the axion phase at theta = -beta. As the universe cools, the minimum of the total potential shifts from -beta to 0, but Hubble friction is claimed to keep theta frozen until H(T) = m_a, after which coherent oscillations about theta = 0 begin. The paper argues this produces coherent axion/ALP oscillations on cosmological scales without inflation, and includes estimates of the suppression of thermal fluctuations.

Significance. If correct, the proposal would offer a genuinely new way to generate the initial misalignment needed for axion dark matter or other ALP phenomena in early-universe scenarios that do not include inflation. The paper is clearly motivated and identifies a real gap in non-inflationary cosmology. However, the central dynamical claim is asserted rather than demonstrated: the paper does not solve the equation of motion or compare the angular mass from Eq. (8) with the Hubble rate. A simple estimate shows that the Planck-suppressed thermal potential is too weak to align theta against Hubble friction for realistic g_*. The manuscript is a short proposal with heuristic arguments rather than a quantitative analysis; its strength lies in framing the idea, but the viability of the mechanism is not established.

major comments (3)

[II, Eqs. (8)-(13)] The load-bearing assertion that 'thermal effects localize theta at the value theta = -beta' is not justified. For n=1, the angular mass squared from Eq. (8) is m_theta^2 = T^4/m_pl^2, while in a radiation-dominated universe H = c T^2/m_pl with c^2 = pi^2 g_*/90. Hence m_theta/H = sqrt(90/(pi^2 g_*)), which is 0.3 for g_* ~ 100 and unity for g_* ~ 10. The equation of motion theta-ddot + 3H theta-dot + m_theta^2 sin(theta+beta) = 0 is overdamped when m_theta < H, with relaxation rate Gamma = m_theta^2/(3H) = H/(3c^2). For g_* ~ 100, Gamma/H ~ 0.03, so the field moves only a few percent of the way toward -beta in one Hubble time. Starting from the Kibble-random distribution produced at PQ breaking, theta cannot relax to -beta before the minimum shifts. The mechanism therefore presupposes the initial condition it is intended to generate.
[II, Eqs. (9)-(10)] The derivation of the thermal effective potential (8) from the hidden-sector interaction (9) is only sketched. The statement 'integrating out chi leads to an effective potential of the form (8)' assumes thermal equilibrium and replaces chi^4 by T^4, but the interaction (9) also gives a temperature-dependent mass to chi and can generate corrections to the kinetic term of theta; none of these effects are computed. A one-loop or density-matrix calculation is needed to justify the simple form (8) and to assess whether the model is self-consistent. This gap is not fatal by itself, but it compounds the dynamical problem in the first comment.
[II, Eq. (13)] The freeze condition H(T) = m_a is standard, but the paper does not verify that theta is actually at -beta before this condition is reached. The minimum of the total potential shifts continuously between -beta and 0; whether the field tracks the minimum or remains frozen depends on the relative size of the relaxation rate and the rate of change of the minimum. No such comparison is presented, and no numerical evolution is given. The statement that 'theta will begin oscillations about theta = 0 coherently over space' is thus an assumption rather than a result.

minor comments (4)

[II, Eq. (12)] The ALP mass term in Eq. (12) is written as (1/2) m_a^2 theta^2, omitting the f_a^2 factor that appears in Eq. (4) and in the first term of Eq. (12). It should read (1/2) m_a^2 f_a^2 theta^2, consistent with the rest of the paper.
[II, Eqs. (14)-(16)] The thermal fluctuation estimate is difficult to parse. Eq. (14) states delta-theta ~ R^{-3/2}, but delta-theta is dimensionless and R^{-3/2} has dimensions of length^{-3/2}; Eq. (15) has dimensionally inconsistent powers, and the numerical estimate in Eq. (16) appears garbled. Please provide a clear derivation and correct the units.
[Throughout] The notation for the Planck mass switches between m_pl and M_pl, and it is not stated whether the reduced Planck mass is intended. This matters for numerical estimates, notably Eq. (16).
[II, paragraph after Eq. (16)] The sentence 'consider the temperature when the offset of theta is frozen in to be 10 -mmpl' is incomplete and appears to contain a typo; please rephrase.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the mechanism is an explicit model construction with beta as a free input, and self-citations are background only.

full rationale

The paper constructs an explicit model: a Planck-suppressed thermal potential (Eq. 8) with a minimum at theta=-beta, generated by the hidden-sector interaction (Eq. 9). The claim that theta is localized at -beta at high temperatures is an immediate consequence of the assumed potential, not a derived prediction; beta is a free parameter of the construction. The subsequent freeze-out and onset of oscillations at H(T)=m_a (Eq. 13) is the standard misalignment equation of motion, and the shift of the total minimum from -beta to 0 (Eq. 12) is a direct algebraic consequence of the two potentials. No quantity is fitted to data, no external result is invoked as a load-bearing input, and the self-citations (e.g., [13]-[17], [20]-[22], [28]) are background context or the author's reviews, not uniqueness theorems or fitted constraints. The skeptical objection that the relaxation rate for n=1 is too small for localization is a dynamical adequacy concern, not a circularity: it questions whether the assumed potential can in fact drive the field to -beta, but it does not show that the paper's equations define the predicted quantity into existence. The central claim is therefore self-contained relative to its assumptions; whether those assumptions are physically realized is a separate correctness question.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The mechanism introduces no fitted constants, but its viability depends on a set of model parameters (beta, n, f_a, m_a, lambda_chi) and on a hidden-sector construction that is not independently evidenced. The freeze during the minimum shift is an additional ad hoc dynamical premise.

free parameters (5)

beta = unspecified, assumed nonzero and order one
Phase offset of the Planck-suppressed potential; the entire misalignment amplitude is set by beta. If beta = 0, no misalignment.
n = n = 1 for ALPs, n >= 6 for QCD axion
Power of Planck suppression in Eqs. (7)-(9); chosen by model, not predicted.
f_a = unspecified
Axion decay constant or PQ scale, an input model parameter.
m_a = unspecified
Low-temperature ALP mass from instanton effects, an input.
lambda_chi = ~1
Self-coupling of the hidden sector field chi, assumed order unity to keep chi in thermal equilibrium.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Global symmetries are broken by quantum gravity at the Planck scale.
Motivates V_p; cited from literature [23-25], not proven.
ad hoc to paper A hidden sector field chi in thermal equilibrium with V_chi = lambda_chi chi^4 gives an effective potential (8) after integrating out chi.
Introduced for this mechanism; no interaction rates or production mechanism shown; central to making the thermal potential.
domain assumption At temperatures below the PQ scale the radial mode is frozen at phi_r = f_a.
Standard low-energy effective theory for axion; stated in Section II.
ad hoc to paper The angular field theta is initially in the minimum of the high-temperature potential and remains frozen while the minimum shifts to 0.
The key dynamical premise; asserted via Hubble friction but not derived from an m_theta vs H comparison.
domain assumption Standard Friedmann cosmology with H ~ T^2/m_pl and radiation domination.
Used for freeze at H = m_a and for fluctuation estimates; not stated explicitly but implied.

invented entities (1)

Hidden sector scalar chi with coupling V_int = chi^{2+2n}/m_pl^{2n} |phi|^2 (1 - cos(theta + beta))
purpose: Mediates Planck-suppressed global symmetry breaking to the axion sector through thermal effects, producing the high-temperature potential (8).
No independent observational or experimental handle is given; introduced ad hoc to realize V_T.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Non-Inflationary Axion and ALP Misalignment Mechanism." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NY77WQ5D

@misc{pith2026250700785,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Non-Inflationary Axion and ALP Misalignment Mechanism},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NY77WQ5D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00785}
}

read the original abstract

Based on considerations of quantum gravity, global symmetries which lead to axions as pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons after low scale symmetry breaking cannot be exact at the Planck scale. Here, we show that Planck-suppressed terms which yield this symmetry breaking may provide a non-inflationary misalignment mechanism which can generate coherent oscillations of the axion and axion-like particle (ALP) fields at low temperatures.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Thermal Alignment as a Pathway to Axion Dark Matter
hep-ph 2026-08 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

A thermal bath that damps an axion also imprints fluctuations, and this paper derives a covariance bound plus a gauge model in which one transition determines the late axion phase space as dark matter.
Numerical Backreaction and Finite-Time Energy Transfer in Post-Recombination Magnetogenesis from Ultralight Dark Matter
hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Numerical simulations of post-recombination axion dark matter show that for dimensionless coupling α_eff ≳ 0.39, over half the dark-matter energy is transferred into gauge-field modes before back-reaction stops the resonance.
Parametric Resonance and Backreaction Effects in Magnetogenesis from Ultralight Dark Matter
astro-ph.CO 2026-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

A narrow parametric resonance channel exists in axion-DM magnetogenesis, but its claimed dominance at very small couplings is undermined by unchecked expansion damping.
Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal
astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

DESI data indicating evolving dark energy may allow string theory to describe observed universes without violating swampland constraints on constant dark energy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

[1]

Light Pseudoscalars, Particle Physics and Cosmology,

J. E. Kim, “Light Pseudoscalars, Particle Physics and Cosmology,” Phys. Rept. 150, 1-177 (1987) doi:10.1016/0370-1573(87)90017-2; D. J. E. Marsh, “Axion Cosmology,” Phys. Rept. 643, 1-79 (2016) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.005 [arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]]

arXiv 1987
[2]

A New Light Boson?,

S. Weinberg, “A New Light Boson?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223-226 (1978) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.223; F. Wilczek, “Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 279-282 (1978) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.279

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.223 1978
[3]

A Simple Solu- tion to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,

M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki, “A Simple Solu- tion to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,” Phys. Lett. B 104, 199-202 (1981) doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(81)90590-6; A. R. Zhitnitsky, “On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian),” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31, 260 (1980); M. Dine and W. Fischler, “The Not So Harmless Axion...

doi:10.1016/0370- 1981
[4]

Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,

J. Preskill, M. B. Wise and F. Wilczek, “Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B 120, 127-132 (1983) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90637-8

doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90637-8 1983
[5]

Axions In String The- ory,

P. Svrcek and E. Witten, “Axions In String The- ory,” JHEP 06, 051 (2006) doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2006/06/051 [arXiv:hep-th/0605206 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2006
[6]

Ultra-light dark matter,

E. G. M. Ferreira, “Ultra-light dark matter,” Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 29, no.1, 7 (2021) doi:10.1007/s00159- 021-00135-6 [arXiv:2005.03254 [astro-ph.CO]]; L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine and E. Wit- ten, “Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 95, no.4, 043541 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.043541 [arXiv:1610.08297 [astro-ph.CO]]

arXiv 2021
[7]

Cosmo- logical Magnetic Fields from Ultralight Dark Matter,

R. Brandenberger, J. Fr¨ ohlich and H. Jiao, “Cosmo- logical Magnetic Fields from Ultralight Dark Matter,” [arXiv:2502.19310 [hep-ph]]

arXiv
[8]

Cosmological Mag- netic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Ob- servation,

R. Durrer and A. Neronov, “Cosmological Mag- netic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Ob- servation,” Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21, 62 (2013) doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0062-7 [arXiv:1303.7121 [astro- 4 ph.CO]]

arXiv 2013

Show all 29 references

[9]

Direct Col- lapse Supermassive Black Holes from Ultralight Dark Matter,

H. Jiao, R. Brandenberger and V. Kamali, “Direct Col- lapse Supermassive Black Holes from Ultralight Dark Matter,” [arXiv:2503.19414 [astro-ph.CO]]

arXiv
[10]

Massive black holes at high redshifts from superconducting cosmic strings,

B. Cyr, H. Jiao and R. Brandenberger, “Massive black holes at high redshifts from superconducting cosmic strings,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 517, no.2, 2221-2230 (2022) doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1939 [arXiv:2202.01799 [astro-ph.CO]]; H. Jiao, R. Brandenberger and A. Refregier, “...

2022 arXiv
[11]

CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440-1443 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1440

1977 doi
[12]

Some Implications of a Cosmolog- ical Phase Transition,

T. W. B. Kibble, “Some Implications of a Cosmolog- ical Phase Transition,” Phys. Rept. 67, 183 (1980) doi:10.1016/0370-1573(80)90091-5

1980 doi
[13]

Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems,

R. Brandenberger and P. Peter, “Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems,” Found. Phys. 47, no. 6, 797 (2017) [arXiv:1603.05834 [hep-th]]

2017 arXiv
[14]

The Ekpyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang,

J. Khoury, B. A. Ovrut, P. J. Steinhardt and N. Turok, “The Ekpyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang,” Phys. Rev. D 64, 123522 (2001) [hep-th/0103239]

2001 arXiv
[15]

Superstrings In The Early Universe,

R. H. Brandenberger and C. Vafa, “Superstrings In The Early Universe,” Nucl. Phys. B 316, 391 (1989)

1989
[16]

swampland

(see e.g. [17] for a review of early universe scenar- ios). Recently, a number of conceptual challenges have been raised which indicate the standard slow-roll infla- tion cannot emerge at the level of an effective field theory. These include “swampland” arguments [18] which sh...

2025 arXiv
[17]

Emer- gent cosmology from matrix theory,

S. Brahma, R. Brandenberger and S. Laliberte, “Emer- gent cosmology from matrix theory,” JHEP 03, 067 (2022) [arXiv:2107.11512 [hep-th]]; S. Brahma, R. Brandenberger and S. Laliberte, “Emergent metric space-time from matrix theory,” JHEP 09, 031 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2022)...

2022 arXiv
[18]

Introduction to Early Uni- verse Cosmology,

R. H. Brandenberger, “Introduction to Early Uni- verse Cosmology,” PoS ICFI2010, 001 (2010) doi:10.22323/1.124.0001 [arXiv:1103.2271 [astro- ph.CO]]; R. Brandenberger, “Superstring cosmology — a complementary review,” JCAP 11, 019 (2023) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/019 [arXi...

2010 arXiv
[19]

De Sit- ter Space and the Swampland,

G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko and C. Vafa, “De Sit- ter Space and the Swampland,” arXiv:1806.08362 [hep- th]

arXiv
[20]

Trans-Planckian Censor- ship and the Swampland,

A. Bedroya and C. Vafa, “Trans-Planckian Censor- ship and the Swampland,” JHEP 2009, 123 (2020) [arXiv:1909.11063 [hep-th]]

2020 arXiv
[21]

Trans-Planckian Censorship and Inflationary Cosmol- ogy,

A. Bedroya, R. Brandenberger, M. Loverde and C. Vafa, “Trans-Planckian Censorship and Inflationary Cosmol- ogy,” Phys. Rev. D 101, no. 10, 103502 (2020) [arXiv:1909.11106 [hep-th]]

2020 arXiv
[22]

Fundamental Physics, the Swamp- land of Effective Field Theory and Early Universe Cos- mology,

R. Brandenberger, “Fundamental Physics, the Swamp- land of Effective Field Theory and Early Universe Cos- mology,” arXiv:1911.06058 [hep-th]; R. Brandenberger, “Trans-Planckian Censorship Conjec- ture and Early Universe Cosmology,” arXiv:2102.09641 [hep-th]; R. Brandenberger, ...

1911 arXiv
[23]

Entanglement entropy of cosmological pertur- bations,

S. Brahma, O. Alaryani and R. Brandenberger, “Entanglement entropy of cosmological pertur- bations,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.4, 043529 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.043529 [arXiv:2005.09688 [hep-th]]

2020 arXiv
[24]

Report on Progress in Wormhole Physics,

T. Banks, “Report on Progress in Wormhole Physics,” Physicalia Mag. 12, 19-68 (1990) SCIPP-89-17

1990
[25]

The String Landscape, the Swampland, and the Missing Corner,

T. D. Brennan, F. Carta and C. Vafa, “The String Landscape, the Swampland, and the Missing Corner,” PoS TASI 2017, 015 (2017) doi:10.22323/1.305.0015 [arXiv:1711.00864 [hep-th]]; E. Palti, “The Swampland: Introduction and Re- view,” Fortsch. Phys. 67, no.6, 1900037 (2019) doi:...

2017 arXiv
[26]

Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity,

R. Holman, S. D. H. Hsu, T. W. Kephart, E. W. Kolb, R. Watkins and L. M. Widrow, “Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 282, 132-136 (1992) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90491-L [arXiv:hep-ph/9203206 [hep-ph]]; M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russe...

1992 arXiv
[27]

Ruling out light ax- ions: The writing is on the wall,

K. A. Beyer and S. Sarkar, “Ruling out light ax- ions: The writing is on the wall,” SciPost Phys. 15, no.1, 003 (2023) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.1.003 [arXiv:2211.14635 [hep-ph]]

2023 arXiv
[28]

The Problem of Axion Quality: A Low Energy Effective Action Perspective,

M. Dine, “The Problem of Axion Quality: A Low Energy Effective Action Perspective,” [arXiv:2207.01068 [hep- ph]]

arXiv
[29]

PHYSICS OF THE EARLY UNIVERSE: THE INFLATIONARY UNIVERSE AND COSMIC STRINGS,

R. H. Brandenberger, “PHYSICS OF THE EARLY UNIVERSE: THE INFLATIONARY UNIVERSE AND COSMIC STRINGS,” PRINT-87-0217 (CAMBRIDGE)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Light Pseudoscalars, Particle Physics and Cosmology,

J. E. Kim, “Light Pseudoscalars, Particle Physics and Cosmology,” Phys. Rept. 150, 1-177 (1987) doi:10.1016/0370-1573(87)90017-2; D. J. E. Marsh, “Axion Cosmology,” Phys. Rept. 643, 1-79 (2016) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.005 [arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]]

arXiv 1987

[2] [2]

A New Light Boson?,

S. Weinberg, “A New Light Boson?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223-226 (1978) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.223; F. Wilczek, “Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 279-282 (1978) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.279

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.223 1978

[3] [3]

A Simple Solu- tion to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,

M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki, “A Simple Solu- tion to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,” Phys. Lett. B 104, 199-202 (1981) doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(81)90590-6; A. R. Zhitnitsky, “On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian),” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31, 260 (1980); M. Dine and W. Fischler, “The Not So Harmless Axion...

doi:10.1016/0370- 1981

[4] [4]

Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,

J. Preskill, M. B. Wise and F. Wilczek, “Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B 120, 127-132 (1983) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90637-8

doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90637-8 1983

[5] [5]

Axions In String The- ory,

P. Svrcek and E. Witten, “Axions In String The- ory,” JHEP 06, 051 (2006) doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2006/06/051 [arXiv:hep-th/0605206 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2006

[6] [6]

Ultra-light dark matter,

E. G. M. Ferreira, “Ultra-light dark matter,” Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 29, no.1, 7 (2021) doi:10.1007/s00159- 021-00135-6 [arXiv:2005.03254 [astro-ph.CO]]; L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine and E. Wit- ten, “Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 95, no.4, 043541 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.043541 [arXiv:1610.08297 [astro-ph.CO]]

arXiv 2021

[7] [7]

Cosmo- logical Magnetic Fields from Ultralight Dark Matter,

R. Brandenberger, J. Fr¨ ohlich and H. Jiao, “Cosmo- logical Magnetic Fields from Ultralight Dark Matter,” [arXiv:2502.19310 [hep-ph]]

arXiv

[8] [8]

Cosmological Mag- netic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Ob- servation,

R. Durrer and A. Neronov, “Cosmological Mag- netic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Ob- servation,” Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21, 62 (2013) doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0062-7 [arXiv:1303.7121 [astro- 4 ph.CO]]

arXiv 2013