arxiv: 2605.10476 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-th

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal

Luis A. Anchordoqui , Dieter Lust

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 04:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-th

keywords de Sitter swamplanddark energyDESIstring theorycosmologyLambda CDMbaryon acoustic oscillationsdynamical dark energy

0 comments

The pith

Recent DESI measurements favoring evolving dark energy may allow string theory to escape the de Sitter swampland.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the long-standing difficulty string theory faces in constructing stable de Sitter vacua with constant dark energy, which would place the standard Lambda CDM model in the swampland of inconsistent quantum gravity theories. DESI baryon acoustic oscillation data combined with other surveys indicate a preference for dark energy whose density has decreased by roughly ten percent over the past several billion years. This review connects those observational hints to string-inspired models of dynamical dark energy. A sympathetic reader would care because the result offers a potential observational escape route for string theory from one of its sharpest conflicts with cosmology.

Core claim

The central claim is that the apparent preference in recent DESI data for a time-evolving dark energy density, rather than a constant Lambda, opens a pathway for string theory to describe our universe without violating the de Sitter swampland conjectures that forbid stable de Sitter spaces.

What carries the argument

The de Sitter swampland conjecture, which states that effective field theories admitting stable de Sitter vacua cannot arise from consistent string theory compactifications.

If this is right

Constant dark energy models such as Lambda CDM become harder to reconcile with string theory.
Dynamical dark energy scenarios gain support as more likely to be consistent with quantum gravity.
String theory models incorporating quintessence-like fields can now be confronted directly with cosmological data.
The observed reduction in dark energy density over the last several billion years supplies a concrete target for string constructions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the DESI trend holds, next-generation surveys such as Euclid or the Rubin Observatory could further test whether the evolution matches specific string-theory predictions for the dark energy equation of state.
Any alternative Lambda CDM explanation for the DESI results would have to be exhaustively excluded before the string-theory compatibility argument can be considered robust.
Explicit model-building efforts could now focus on string compactifications that naturally produce a slowly rolling scalar field whose energy density drops by about ten percent in the recent past.

Load-bearing premise

The preference for evolving dark energy reported by DESI reflects the true expansion history rather than unaccounted systematics or alternative explanations still allowed inside Lambda CDM.

What would settle it

Future surveys returning a clear confirmation of constant dark energy density, or an explicit construction of a stable de Sitter vacuum within string theory, would remove the proposed resolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10476 by Dieter Lust, Luis A. Anchordoqui.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Modular invariant potential (91) in the s-a plane (left) and along the axionic direction for s = 1 (right). At a = 0 and s = 1 the potential has a minimum which persists for s ≥ 1. 0 2 4 6 8 10 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Modular Invariant S-dual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Comparison of the S-dual (orange) and modular-invariant (blue) potentials in the s (left) and ϕ (right) coordinates. is at the self-dual point. With the minimum persisting at the self-dual point ∀s ≥ 1, the axion a is effectively frozen at the potential’s minimum. The modular invariant potential shares key characteristics with the S-dual potential (83) at both the self-dual point and in the large-s limit. … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The persistent challenge of creating stable de Sitter vacua within string theory undermines the observational validity of the $\Lambda$ cold dark matter (CDM) model. This difficulty suggests that the concordance model of cosmology, characterized by a constant dark energy $\Lambda$, may reside in the swampland of inconsistent quantum gravity theories rather than the string landscape of consistent ones. Recent observational data, particularly from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), have significantly challenged $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. Specifically, the combination of DESI baryon acoustic oscillation measurements with cosmological surveys seem to indicate a preference for a dynamic, time-evolving dark energy rather than a constant, with roughly 10\% reduction in density over the last several billion years. This review summarizes significant advancements made over the past two years in linking DESI findings to string-inspired scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This review connects DESI hints of evolving dark energy to swampland evasion but adds no original results.

read the letter

This paper is a review that connects recent DESI data favoring time-varying dark energy to string theory constructions that might evade the de Sitter swampland. It does not present any new calculations or observations. The review does a good job of summarizing the observational side, where DESI baryon acoustic oscillation measurements combined with other surveys point to a dynamic dark energy that has decreased in density by about 10% over the last few billion years. It then outlines how this could open doors for string-inspired models with evolving potentials or other features that avoid the inconsistencies of a constant Lambda in quantum gravity. By focusing on advancements from the past two years, it gives a snapshot of the current discussion without overclaiming. What the paper handles well is the linkage: it shows why constant dark energy is problematic in string theory and how the DESI preference for evolution might relax those constraints. The structure is straightforward for readers wanting to see the bridge between data and theory. The main soft spot is that everything rests on the cited external papers. The review itself does not verify the DESI results or perform any cross-checks, so if the apparent preference for evolving dark energy turns out to be due to systematics, the proposed escape from the swampland weakens. There is also the usual risk with reviews that the selection of references might emphasize certain viewpoints, though the abstract suggests a balanced approach. No load-bearing math or data analysis is done here, which limits how much one can probe the claims directly from the text. This kind of paper is useful for cosmologists and string phenomenologists who follow both the latest survey results and the swampland conjectures. It provides a convenient entry point to the recent literature for someone who does not have time to read all the individual papers. A reader expecting original model building or new predictions will be disappointed. The work shows clear engagement with the literature and presents the ideas coherently on its own terms. I would bring this to a reading group for discussion on observational implications for theory. I would not cite it for any novel finding. It deserves peer review as a review article because the topic is relevant and the summary could aid the community, provided the tentativeness of the data is emphasized.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review summarizing the string-theory de Sitter swampland problem for constant-Lambda cosmologies and recent DESI BAO measurements (combined with other surveys) that appear to favor time-evolving dark energy with an approximately 10% density reduction over the last several billion years. It compiles advancements from the past two years that connect these observations to string-inspired models with dynamic dark energy, thereby offering a potential route out of the swampland.

Significance. If the cited DESI preference for evolving dark energy is robust, the review usefully consolidates literature at the interface of observational cosmology and string theory. Its value lies in synthesizing external results rather than deriving new ones; credit is due for focusing on falsifiable observational inputs (DESI BAO) and for avoiding internal derivations that could introduce circularity.

minor comments (1)

Abstract: the quantitative claim of a 'roughly 10% reduction in density' should be tied explicitly to a cited DESI analysis or table in the main text so readers can trace the origin of the number without ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript as a timely review synthesizing DESI observations with string-theory swampland considerations, and for recommending minor revision. We agree that the value lies in consolidating external results rather than new derivations, and we have prepared minor updates to improve clarity and completeness.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review of external data and literature

full rationale

The paper is explicitly a review that summarizes existing DESI BAO results from external surveys and prior string-theory constructions for time-varying dark energy. No new derivations, parameter fits, predictions, or model-building equations are introduced whose validity depends on quantities defined inside the manuscript. All central claims rest on cited external analyses rather than self-referential definitions or internal reductions, satisfying the default expectation of no circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review rests on standard assumptions of string theory and cosmology without introducing new free parameters or invented entities in the abstract itself.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Stable de Sitter vacua are difficult or impossible to construct in string theory (swampland conjecture).
Invoked in the opening paragraph as the persistent challenge undermining Lambda CDM.
domain assumption DESI BAO measurements combined with other surveys genuinely favor evolving dark energy.
Stated as the observational input that challenges constant Lambda.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5440 in / 1213 out tokens · 40422 ms · 2026-05-12T04:18:40.845042+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

dS conjecture... Mp |∇V|/V ≡ c′ ≳ O(1) or −Mp² min(∇i∇jV)/V ≡ c″ ≳ O(1)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean costAlphaLog_fourth_deriv_at_zero unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

V(ϕ) = Λ sech(κ ϕ/Mp) ... V(s) = 2Λ/(s + 1/s)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

296 extracted references · 296 canonical work pages · 26 internal anchors

[1]

A. G. Riesset al.[Supernova Search Team], Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J.116, 1009-1038 (1998) doi:10.1086/300499 [arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 [astro-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/300499 1998
[2]

Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae

S. Perlmutteret al.[Supernova Cosmology Project], Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High Redshift Supernovae, Astrophys. J.517, 565-586 (1999) doi:10.1086/307221 [arXiv:astro- ph/9812133 [astro-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/307221 1999
[3]

Efstathiou, W

G. Efstathiou, W. J. Sutherland and S. J. Maddox, The cosmological constant and cold dark matter, Nature348, 705-707 (1990) doi:10.1038/348705a0

work page doi:10.1038/348705a0 1990
[4]

Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results

G. Hinshawet al.[WMAP], Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results, Astrophys. J. Suppl.208, 19 (2013) doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 [arXiv:1212.5226 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 2013
[5]

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], Planck 2018 results VI: Cosmological parameters, Astron. As- trophys.641, A6 (2020) [erratum: Astron. Astrophys.652, C4 (2021)] doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/201833910 [arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004- 2018
[6]

DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

M. Abdul Karimet al.[DESI], DESI DR2 results II: Measurements of baryon acoustic oscilla- tions and cosmological constraints, Phys. Rev. D112, no.8, 083515 (2025) doi:10.1103/tr6y- kpc6 [arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]]. 41

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/tr6y- 2025
[7]

M. A. Sabogal and R. C. Nunes, Robust evidence for dynamical dark energy from DESI galaxy-CMB lensing cross-correlation and geometric probes, JCAP09, 084 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/084 [arXiv:2505.24465 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/084 2025
[8]

Ishak and L

M. Ishak and L. Medina-Varela, Persistent and serious challenge to the ΛCDM throne: Ev- idence for dynamical dark energy rising from combinations of different types of datasets, [arXiv:2507.22856 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page arXiv
[9]

P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Cosmology with a Time Variable Cosmological Constant, Astrophys. J. Lett.325, L17 (1988) doi:10.1086/185100

work page doi:10.1086/185100 1988
[10]

Ratra and P

B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, Cosmological Consequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field, Phys. Rev. D37, 3406 (1988) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3406

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.3406 1988
[11]

The cosmon model for an asymptotically vanishing time-dependent cosmological ``constant''

C. Wetterich, The Cosmon model for an asymptotically vanishing time dependent cosmolog- ical ’constant’, Astron. Astrophys.301, 321-328 (1995) [arXiv:hep-th/9408025 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 1995
[12]

R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave and P. J. Steinhardt, Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1582-1585 (1998) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1582 [arXiv:astro-ph/9708069 [astro-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1582 1998
[13]

The String Landscape and the Swampland

C. Vafa, The string landscape and the swampland, [arXiv:hep-th/0509212 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv
[14]

Palti, The swampland: introduction and review, Fortsch

E. Palti, The swampland: introduction and review, Fortsch. Phys.67, no.6, 1900037 (2019) doi:10.1002/prop.201900037 [arXiv:1903.06239 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1002/prop.201900037 2019
[15]

van Beest, J

M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela, Lectures on the Swampland Program in string compactifications, Phys. Rept.989, 1-50 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.09.002 [arXiv:2102.01111 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.09.002 2022
[16]

Gra˜ na and A

M. Gra˜ na and A. Herr´ aez, The Swampland Conjectures: A Bridge from Quantum Gravity to Particle Physics, Universe7, no.8, 273 (2021) doi:10.3390/universe7080273 [arXiv:2107.00087 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.3390/universe7080273 2021
[17]

N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang and C. Vafa, Lectures on the string landscape and the swampland, [arXiv:2212.06187 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv
[18]

L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. L¨ ust, Landscape, Swampland, and Extra Dimen- sions, PoSCORFU2023, 215 (2024) doi:10.22323/1.463.0215 [arXiv:2405.04427 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.22323/1.463.0215 2024
[19]

E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, Dynamics of dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 1753-1936 (2006) doi:10.1142/S021827180600942X [arXiv:hep-th/0603057 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s021827180600942x 1936
[20]

Dark energy from string theory: an introductory review

D. Andriot, Dark energy from string theory: an introductory review, [arXiv:2603.25797 [hep- 42 th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[21]

Annalen der Physik , year = 1916, volume = 354, pages =

A. Einstein, The foundation of the general theory of relativity, Annalen Phys.49, no.7, 769-822 (1916) doi:10.1002/andp.19163540702

work page doi:10.1002/andp.19163540702 1916
[22]

Einstein, Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Relativity, Sitzungsber

A. Einstein, Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Relativity, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. )1917, 142-152 (1917)

work page 1917
[23]

Friedmann, On the Curvature of space, Z

A. Friedmann, On the Curvature of space, Z. Phys.10, 377-386 (1922) doi:10.1007/BF01332580

work page doi:10.1007/bf01332580 1922
[24]

Friedmann, On the Possibility of a world with constant negative curvature of space, Z

A. Friedmann, On the Possibility of a world with constant negative curvature of space, Z. Phys.21, 326-332 (1924) doi:10.1007/BF01328280

work page doi:10.1007/bf01328280 1924
[25]

Lemaitre, A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Growing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extragalactic Nebulae, Annales Soc

G. Lemaitre, A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Growing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extragalactic Nebulae, Annales Soc. Sci. Bruxelles A47, 49-59 (1927) doi:10.1007/s10714-013-1548-3

work page doi:10.1007/s10714-013-1548-3 1927
[26]

H. P. Robertson, Kinematics and World-Structure, Astrophys. J.82, 284-301 (1935) doi:10.1086/143681

work page doi:10.1086/143681 1935
[27]

A. G. Walker, On Milne’s Theory of World-Structure, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s2-42, no.1, 90-127 (1937) doi:10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.90

work page doi:10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.90 1937
[28]

Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , year = 1929, month = mar, volume =

E. Hubble, A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA1929,15, 168–173. doi:10.1073/pnas.15.3.168

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.15.3.168
[29]

Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], Review of particle physics, Phys

S. Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, no.3, 030001 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.03 0001

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.03 2024
[30]

Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter

M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D10, 213-224 (2001) doi:10.1142/S0218271801000822 [arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0218271801000822 2001
[31]

E. V. Linder, Exploring the expansion history of the universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 091301 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.091301 [arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 [astro-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.091301 2003
[32]

D. H. Weinberg, M. J. Mortonson, D. J. Eisenstein, C. Hirata, A. G. Riess and E. Rozo, Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration, Phys. Rept.530, 87-255 (2013) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.001 [arXiv:1201.2434 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.001 2013
[33]

Brieden, H

S. Brieden, H. Gil-Mar´ ın and L. Verde, A tale of two (or more)h’s, JCAP04, 023 (2023) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/04/023 [arXiv:2212.04522 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/04/023 2023
[34]

A. G. Adameet al.[DESI], DESI 2024 III: baryon acoustic oscillations from galaxies and quasars, JCAP04, 012 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/012 [arXiv:2404.03000 [astro- 43 ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/012 2024
[35]

A. G. Adameet al.[DESI], DESI 2024 II: sample definitions, characteristics, and two-point clustering statistics, JCAP07, 017 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/07/017 [arXiv:2411.12020 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/07/017 2024
[36]

D. W. Hogg, Distance measures in cosmology, [arXiv:astro-ph/9905116 [astro-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[37]

and Challinor, A

A. Lewis, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby, Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models, Astrophys. J.538, 473-476 (2000) doi:10.1086/309179 [arXiv:astro-ph/9911177 [astro-ph]]

work page doi:10.1086/309179 2000
[38]

Torrado and A

J. Torrado and A. Lewis, Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models, JCAP05, 057 (2021) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/057 [arXiv:2005.05290 [astro-ph.IM]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/057 2021
[39]

A. J. Rosset al.[eBOSS], The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectro- scopic Survey: Large-scale structure catalogues for cosmological analysis, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498, no.2, 2354-2371 (2020) doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2416 [arXiv:2007.09000 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2416 2020
[40]

A. G. Adameet al.[DESI], DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations, JCAP02, 021 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 [arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 2024
[41]

Aghanimet al.[Planck], Planck 2018 results V: CMB power spectra and likelihoods, As- tron

N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], Planck 2018 results V: CMB power spectra and likelihoods, As- tron. Astrophys.641, A5 (2020) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936386 [arXiv:1907.12875 [astro- ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936386 2018
[42]

F. J. Quet al.[ACT], The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and Its Implications for Structure Growth, Astrophys. J.962, no.2, 112 (2024) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfe06 [arXiv:2304.05202 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfe06 2024
[43]

MacCrannet al.[ACT], The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Mitigating the Impact of Extragalactic Foregrounds for the DR6 Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing Analysis, Astrophys

N. MacCrannet al.[ACT], The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Mitigating the Impact of Extragalactic Foregrounds for the DR6 Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing Analysis, Astrophys. J.966, no.1, 138 (2024) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2610 [arXiv:2304.05196 [astro- ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2610 2024
[44]

M. S. Madhavacherilet al.[ACT], The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravita- tional Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters, Astrophys. J.962, no.2, 113 (2024) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acff5f [arXiv:2304.05203 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acff5f 2024
[45]

Carron, M

J. Carron, M. Mirmelstein and A. Lewis, CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps, JCAP09, 44 039 (2022) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/039 [arXiv:2206.07773 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/039 2022
[46]

Scolnicet al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys

D. Scolnicet al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys. J.938, no.2, 113 (2022) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a [arXiv:2112.03863 [astro- ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a 2022
[47]

The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

D. Broutet al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints, Astrophys. J.938, no.2, 110 (2022) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8e04 [arXiv:2202.04077 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8e04 2022
[48]

Rubinet al., Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework, Astrophys

D. Rubinet al., Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework, Astrophys. J.986, no.2, 231 (2025) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc0a5 [arXiv:2311.12098 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc0a5 2025
[49]

T. M. C. Abbottet al.[DES], The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set, Astrophys. J. Lett. 973, no.1, L14 (2024) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6f9f [arXiv:2401.02929 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6f9f 2024
[50]

B. Popovicet al.[DES], The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: A Reanalysis Of Cosmology Results And Evidence For Evolving Dark Energy With An Updated Type Ia Supernova Calibration, [arXiv:2511.07517 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[51]

T. J. Hoyt, D. Rubin, G. Aldering, S. Perlmutter, A. Cuceu and R. Gupta, Union3.1: Self-consistent Measurements of Host Galaxy Properties for 2000 Type Ia Supernovae, [arXiv:2601.19424 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page arXiv 2000
[52]

Rubin, T

D. Rubin, T. Hoyt, G. Aldering and S. Perlmutter, Banana Split: Improved Cosmological Constraints with Two Light-Curve-Shape and Color Populations Using Union3.1+UNITY1.8, [arXiv:2601.19854 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page arXiv
[53]

Giar` e, M

W. Giar` e, M. Najafi, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino and J. T. Firouzjaee, Robust preference for Dynamical Dark Energy in DESI BAO and SN measurements, JCAP10, 035 (2024) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/035 [arXiv:2407.16689 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/035 2024
[54]

Cortˆ es and A

M. Cortˆ es and A. R. Liddle, On DESI’s DR2 exclusion of ΛCDM, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.544, L121-L125 (2025) doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf108 [arXiv:2504.15336 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf108 2025
[55]

Shlivko, P

D. Shlivko, P. J. Steinhardt and C. L. Steinhardt, Optimal parameterizations for observational constraints on thawing dark energy, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/06/054 [arXiv:2504.02028 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/06/054 2025
[56]

Shlivko and P

D. Shlivko and P. J. Steinhardt, Assessing observational constraints on dark energy, Phys. Lett. B855, 138826 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138826 [arXiv:2405.03933 [astro- 45 ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138826 2024
[57]

M. L. Abreu and M. S. Turner, DESI Dark Secrets, [arXiv:2502.08876 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[58]

A. J. Shajib and J. A. Frieman, Scalar-field dark energy models: Current and forecast con- straints, Phys. Rev. D112, no.6, 063508 (2025) doi:10.1103/kjpb-r698 [arXiv:2502.06929 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/kjpb-r698 2025
[59]

Esteban, M

I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro and T. Schwetz, NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP 12, 216 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)216 [arXiv:2410.05380 [hep-ph]]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2024)216 2024
[60]

No νs is Good News

N. Craig, D. Green, J. Meyers and S. Rajendran, Noνs is Good News, JHEP09, 097 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)097 [arXiv:2405.00836 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2024)097 2024
[61]

Cosmological preference for a negative neutrino mass

D. Green and J. Meyers, Cosmological preference for a negative neutrino mass, Phys. Rev. D111, no.8, 083507 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083507 [arXiv:2407.07878 [astro- ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.083507 2025
[62]

Elbers, C

W. Elbers, C. S. Frenk, A. Jenkins, B. Li and S. Pascoli, Negative neutrino masses as a mirage of dark energy, Phys. Rev. D111, no.6, 063534 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063534 [arXiv:2407.10965 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.063534 2025
[63]

J. Q. Jiang, W. Giar` e, S. Gariazzo, M. G. Dainotti, E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa and S. Vagnozzi, Neutrino cosmology after DESI: tightest mass upper limits, preference for the normal ordering, and tension with terrestrial observations, JCAP01, 153 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/153 [arXiv:2407.18047 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/153 2025
[64]

L. A. Anchordoqui, D. Marfatia and J. F. Soriano, Massive neutrinos and interacting dark matter look alike through the lens of lensing, Phys. Rev. D (in press) doi:10.1103/r89c-jtp2 [arXiv:2511.01048 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/r89c-jtp2
[65]

Elbers, A

W. Elbers, A. Aviles, H. E. Noriega, D. Chebat, A. Menegas, C. S. Frenk, C. Garcia-Quintero, D. Gonzalez, M. Ishak and O. Lahav,et al.Constraints on neutrino physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 full shape, Phys. Rev. D112, no.8, 083513 (2025) doi:10.1103/w9pk-xsk7 [arXiv:2503.14744 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/w9pk-xsk7 2025
[66]

S. P. Ahlenet al.[DESI], Positive Neutrino Masses with DESI DR2 via Matter Conver- sion to Dark Energy, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, no.8, 081003 (2025) doi:10.1103/yb2k-kn7h [arXiv:2504.20338 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/yb2k-kn7h 2025
[67]

G. H. Du, T. N. Li, P. J. Wu, J. F. Zhang and X. Zhang, Cosmological Preference for a 46 Positive Neutrino Mass at 2.7σ: A Joint Analysis of DESI DR2, DESY5, and DESY1 Data, [arXiv:2507.16589 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page arXiv
[68]

W. Yang, E. Di Valentino, E. V. Linder, S. Zhang and S. Pan, When One-Parameter Dark Energy Makes Neutrinos Physical Again, [arXiv:2603.15422 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page arXiv
[69]

Patel, A

V. Patel, A. Chakraborty and L. Amendola, The prior dependence of the DESI results, [arXiv:2407.06586 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page arXiv
[70]

Efstathiou, Evolving dark energy or supernovae systematics?, Mon

G. Efstathiou, Evolving dark energy or supernovae systematics?, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.538, no.2, 875-882 (2025) doi:10.1093/mnras/staf301 [arXiv:2408.07175 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf301 2025
[71]

E. ´O. Colg´ ain and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, DESI and SNe: Dynamical Dark Energy, Ωm Tension or Systematics?, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.542, no.1, L24-L30 (2025) doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf042 [arXiv:2412.12905 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf042 2025
[72]

E. ´O. Colg´ ain, S. Pourojaghi, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and L. Yin, How much has DESI dark en- ergy evolved since DR1?, Phys. Dark Univ.52, 102268 (2026) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2026.102268 [arXiv:2504.04417 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2026.102268 2026
[73]

Wang and D

D. Wang and D. Mota, Did DESI DR2 truly reveal dynamical dark energy?, Eur. Phys. J. C85, no.11, 1356 (2025) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15076-y [arXiv:2504.15222 [astro- ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15076-y 2025
[74]

Efstathiou, Baryon acoustic oscillations from a different angle, Mon

G. Efstathiou, Baryon acoustic oscillations from a different angle, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 540, no.3, 2844-2852 (2025) doi:10.1093/mnras/staf906 [arXiv:2505.02658 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf906 2025
[75]

D. D. Y. Ong, D. Yallup and W. Handley, A Bayesian Perspective on Evidence for Evolving Dark Energy, [arXiv:2511.10631 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[76]

D. D. Y. Ong, D. Yallup and W. Handley, The Bayesian view of DESI DR2: Evidence and tension in a combined analysis with CMB and supernovae across cosmological models, [arXiv:2603.05472 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page arXiv
[77]

Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies

E. Abdalla, G. Franco Abell´ an, A. Aboubrahim, A. Agnello, O. Akarsu, Y. Akrami, G. Alestas, D. Aloni, L. Amendola and L. A. Anchordoqui,et al.Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmo- logical tensions and anomalies, JHEAp34, 49-211 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 [arXiv:2203.06...

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 2022
[78]

The Local Distance Network: a community consensus report on the measurement of the Hubble constant at 1% precision

S. Casertanoet al.[H0DN], The Local Distance Network: a community consensus report on the measurement of the Hubble constant at 1% precision, Astron. Astrophys.708, A166 47 (2026) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557993 [arXiv:2510.23823 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557993 2026
[79]

Physics of the Dark Universe , keywords =

E. Di Valentinoet al.[CosmoVerse Network], The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics, Phys. Dark Univ.49, 101965 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965 [arXiv:2504.01669 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965 2025
[80]

Y. H. Pang, X. Zhang and Q. G. Huang, The impact of the Hubble tension on the evi- dence for dynamical dark energy, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68, no.8, 280410 (2025) doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2713-8 [arXiv:2503.21600 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2713-8 2025

Showing first 80 references.