Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

NaturalThoughts: Selecting and Distilling Reasoning Traces for General Reasoning Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.01921 v1 pith:7QYJMUUV submitted 2025-07-02 cs.CL

NaturalThoughts: Selecting and Distilling Reasoning Traces for General Reasoning Tasks

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningmodelteacherdistillinggeneralnaturalthoughtsselectingtraces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent work has shown that distilling reasoning traces from a larger teacher model via supervised finetuning outperforms reinforcement learning with the smaller student model alone (Guo et al. 2025). However, there has not been a systematic study of what kind of reasoning demonstrations from the teacher are most effective in improving the student model's reasoning capabilities. In this work we curate high-quality "NaturalThoughts" by selecting reasoning traces from a strong teacher model based on a large pool of questions from NaturalReasoning (Yuan et al. 2025). We first conduct a systematic analysis of factors that affect distilling reasoning capabilities, in terms of sample efficiency and scalability for general reasoning tasks. We observe that simply scaling up data size with random sampling is a strong baseline with steady performance gains. Further, we find that selecting difficult examples that require more diverse reasoning strategies is more sample-efficient to transfer the teacher model's reasoning skills. Evaluated on both Llama and Qwen models, training with NaturalThoughts outperforms existing reasoning datasets such as OpenThoughts, LIMO, etc. on general STEM reasoning benchmarks including GPQA-Diamond, MMLU-Pro and SuperGPQA.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Different Teachers, Different Capabilities: Sub-1B On-Device Distillation for Structured Text Enrichment

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Distilling an 8B reasoning teacher into a 0.6B student recovers most summary quality at ~50× speed, but teacher type—not scale alone—determines which capabilities transfer.

  2. STOP: Structured On-Policy Pruning of Long-Form Reasoning in Low-Data Regimes

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    STOP uses structured on-policy analysis to prune long reasoning traces to their earliest correct node, cutting token usage 19-42% with little accuracy loss on math benchmarks.

  3. Distilling Long-CoT Reasoning through Collaborative Step-wise Multi-Teacher Decoding

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CoRD uses collaborative multi-teacher step-wise decoding with perplexity-guided beam search to generate higher-quality Long-CoT data that lets smaller models reach near-teacher performance with less supervision.

  4. Characterizing Model-Native Skills

    cs.AI 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Recovering an orthogonal basis from model activations yields a model-native skill characterization that improves reasoning Pass@1 by up to 41% via targeted data selection and supports inference steering, outperforming...