Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

RIOJA. JWST and ALMA unveil the inhomogeneous and complex ISM structure in a star-forming galaxy at $z=6.81$

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The galaxy COS-2987 at z=6.81 has an ionized ISM that cannot be described by one temperature and density; two gas phases are required.

desk verdict Solid JWST+ALMA case study confirming the two-phase ISM picture at z~7; the quantitative solution is underdetermined and the abstract oversells it, but the qualitative rejection of a single-phase model is robust. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.02054 v2 pith:4RLFANNQ submitted 2025-07-02 astro-ph.GA

Mitsutaka Usui , Ken Mawatari , Javier Álvarez-Márquez , Takuya Hashimoto , Yuma Sugahara , Rui Marques-Chaves , Akio K. Inoue , Luis Colina
show 16 more authors
Santiago Arribas Carmen Blanco-Prieto Yurina Nakazato Naoki Yoshida Tom J. L. C. Bakx Daniel Ceverino Luca Costantin Alejandro Crespo Gómez Masato Hagimoto Hiroshi Matsuo Wataru Osone Yi W. Ren Yoshinobu Fudamoto Takeshi Hashigaya Miguel Pereira-Santaella Yoichi Tamura
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords high-redshiftgalaxiesdensity-stratifiedISM[OIII]88micronelectrontemperaturedensityJWSTNIRSpecIFSALMAinterstellarmediuminhomogeneity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the interstellar medium of the star-forming galaxy COS-2987 at $z=6.81$ is not a single uniform body of ionized gas. Combining JWST/NIRSpec integral-field spectra of $[\mathrm{O\,III}]\,\lambda4364$, $\lambda5008$, and hydrogen recombination lines with ALMA's detection of $[\mathrm{O\,III}]\,88\,\mu$m, it finds that the observed $[\mathrm{O\,III}]88/5008$ and $[\mathrm{O\,III}]4364/5008$ ratios cannot be reproduced by a homogeneous ionized gas with one electron temperature and one electron density. It then shows that two discrete gas phases—compact gas at about 26,000 K and 500 cm$^{-3}$, plus an extended phase at about 8,000 K and 50 cm$^{-3}$ with roughly 300 times the volume—reproduce both ratios together. If this holds, JWST-only measurements of early galaxies are systematically incomplete, missing the diffuse gas that dominates far-infrared oxygen emission.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is the combined $[\mathrm{O\,III}]$ line-ratio diagnostic. Because $\lambda4364$, $\lambda5008$, and $88\,\mu$m are emitted by the same doubly ionized oxygen ion, their ratios determine $T_e$ and $n_e$ without abundance assumptions; the ratio $\lambda4364/\lambda5008$ is temperature-sensitive, while $88\,\mu$m$/\lambda5008$ is density- and temperature-sensitive. The large difference in critical densities—510 cm$^{-3}$ for $88\,\mu$m versus roughly $6.8\times10^5$ and $3.0\times10^6$ cm$^{-3}$ for $\lambda5008$ and $\lambda4364$—lets the three lines act as probes of different phases. The quantitative model is simple additivity of volume emissivities, $L_{\rm line}=\epsilon_{\rm line,1}V_1+\epsilon_{\rm line,2}V_2$, with emissivities computed under an assumed $\mathrm{O}^{++}/\mathrm{H}^+=10^{-4}$. A two-component mix places the composite ratios on the line connecting the two single-phase grid points, and matching the observed ratios fixes the volume ratio at roughly $1{:}300$.

What would settle it

Measure [OIII]88 and [OIII]5008 at sub-arcsecond resolution with ALMA and map their spatial extents: if [OIII]88 is not significantly more extended than [OIII]5008, the large-volume diffuse component that carries the model would be ruled out, and the ratio discrepancy would need a different mechanism. A second check would measure O++/H+ independently in the diffuse phase from a density-independent recombination line; if it differs from $10^{-4}$, the derived volume ratio is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the three $[\mathrm{O\,III}]$ lines of COS-2987—the optical auroral line $\lambda4364$, the optical nebular line $\lambda5008$, and the far-infrared fine-structure line $88\,\mu$m—cannot all originate from a single phase of ionized gas with one density and one temperature. A homogeneous model that matches the high $[\mathrm{O\,III}]88/5008$ ratio would predict a $[\mathrm{O\,III}]4364/5008$ ratio that disagrees with the measurement, and vice versa. The paper's two-component toy model, with component 1 at $(T_e,n_e)=(26{,}000~\mathrm{K},500~\mathrm{cm}^{-3})$ and component 2 at $(8{,}000~\mathrm{K},50~\mathrm{cm}^{-3})$ and volume ratio $V_1/V_2\simeq 1/300$, reproduces both observed ratios simultaneously. The authors stress that this parameter set is not unique, and they rule out inhomogeneous dust as the primary explanation by showing that pixel-by-pixel dust corrections leave the discrepancy intact. The qualitative conclusion is that the galaxy's ionized ISM is density-stratified: compact hot regions embedded in a much larger reservoir of cool diffuse gas.

Load-bearing premise

The two-component solution assumes the ionized gas is exactly two internally uniform phases sharing the same oxygen abundance ratio O++/H+ = $10^{-4}$; if abundances differ between phases or the gas has continuous density and temperature gradients, the derived component properties and the 1:300 volume ratio would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • JWST-only optical measurements of high-redshift galaxies systematically miss a diffuse ionized component, so densities and temperatures derived from optical lines alone are weighted toward dense gas.
  • The same diagnostic applied to other high-$z$ galaxies with strong $[\mathrm{O\,III}]88$ shows the same offset from homogeneous grids, suggesting the two-phase pattern is common rather than unique to COS-2987.
  • A large-volume, cool, low-density phase is the natural site for the strong far-infrared $[\mathrm{O\,III}]88$ emission, implying a porous, "picket-fence" geometry in which ionizing photons leak from dense regions into surrounding diffuse gas.
  • For COS-2987 the inferred Lyman-continuum escape fraction of 4–14% is consistent with this porous geometry, connecting the ISM structure result to cosmic reionization.
  • Higher-angular-resolution ALMA observations can map $[\mathrm{O\,III}]88$ directly and test whether the diffuse component is spatially extended, as the model predicts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two-phase structure is typical at high redshift, gas-phase metallicities from direct-$T_e$ methods may be biased because optical $[\mathrm{O\,III}]$ and $[\mathrm{O\,II}]$ lines weight different phases; combining far-infrared lines would be needed to recover a mass-weighted abundance.
  • The exact volume ratio of 1:300 is model-dependent; the robust statement is qualitative stratification. A testable prediction is that high-resolution ALMA will find $[\mathrm{O\,III}]88$ more extended than $[\mathrm{O\,III}]5008$, something the current beam-smoothed radial profiles cannot yet rule out.
  • One speculative route the authors leave open is that very massive stars produce the 26,000 K component; rest-frame UV spectra showing strong He II 1640 emission or an enhanced N/O ratio would support that interpretation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. Usui et al. present JWST/NIRSpec IFS and ALMA observations of the z=6.81 star-forming galaxy COS-2987, detecting [OII] λλ3727,3730, [OIII] 4364, [OIII] λλ4960,5008, Hβ, Hα, and [OIII] 88 μm. From the optical lines alone they infer A_V ≈ 0.14 mag, T_e([OIII]) ≈ 2.0×10^4 K, n_e([OII]) ≈ 500 cm^-3, and 12+log(O/H) ≈ 7.67. The central diagnostic combines [OIII] 4364/5008 with [OIII] 88/5008; COS-2987 lies outside the PyNeb single-phase T_e–n_e grid, and a pixel-by-pixel dust correction does not bring it inside. The authors then introduce a two-component toy model with a hot/dense component (T_e ≈ 26,000 K, n_e ≈ 500 cm^-3) and a cool/diffuse component (T_e ≈ 8,000 K, n_e ≈ 50 cm^-3), showing that the observed ratios can be reproduced with V_1/V_2 ≈ 1/300. They explicitly note that this solution is not unique. The paper concludes that the ISM is density-stratified and that JWST-only measurements miss a diffuse low-density phase.

Significance. The qualitative result is important: it provides direct evidence at z ≈ 6.8 that a homogeneous, single-phase ionized-gas model fails to jointly explain optical and FIR [OIII] ratios, and it illustrates the need for ALMA to characterize high-redshift ISM. The inclusion of several literature galaxies strengthens the claim that the discrepancy is not unique to this object. The authors are transparent that the two-component solution is a toy and not unique, which is a strength. The weakness is that the specific numeric parameters in the abstract and conclusions (26,000 K / 8,000 K / 1:300) are not actually constrained by the data; the paper's robust product is the falsification of the single-phase model plus an illustrative stratified-ISM picture.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.2, Eq. (4), Figure 4; abstract and Conclusion (4)] The quantitative two-component solution is underdetermined. The three [OIII] lines provide only two independent ratios, while the model in Eq. (4) has at least five free parameters (T_e,1, n_e,1, T_e,2, n_e,2, V_1/V_2) plus the fixed assumption O++/H+ = 10^-4 in both components. The paper explicitly notes that other parameter sets could reproduce the data, but the abstract and Conclusion (4) present (T_e,1, n_e,1) = (26,000 K, 500 cm^-3), (T_e,2, n_e,2) = (8,000 K, 50 cm^-3), and V_1/V_2 ~ 1/300 as the inferred result. Please add a caveat in the abstract and conclusions that these are illustrative values of a toy model, and provide at least a brief quantitative indication of the degeneracy (e.g., how V_1/V_2 changes if the two components are allowed to have different O++/H+, or if a continuous density/temperature distribution is assumed). The qualitative rejection of a homogeneous single-phase model does not depend on this issue, but the specific numeric claims do.
  2. [§5.1 and Figure 3 (right)] The clumpy-dust test is limited by the resolution of the Balmer-decrement map. The A_V map is constructed from Voronoi-binned Hα/Hβ and sets A_V = 0 outside the 3σ regions, so unresolved dust clumps would not be captured by this test. The conclusion that 'clumpy dust distribution is not the primary cause' should therefore be stated with the caveat that the test probes dust structure on the scales resolved by the PSF-matched map; an extreme unresolved clumpy geometry is not strictly excluded, although it would require fine-tuning. This does not change the main conclusion but makes the claim precise.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.1] Typo: 'one-dimentional' should be 'one-dimensional'.
  2. [§5.3] The section heading contains a duplicated article: 'Interpretation of the the density-stratified ionized ISM'.
  3. [Figure 4] The top-right panel would be easier to read if the two model curves were labeled (e.g., '88/5008' and '4364/5008') and if the intersections with the observed 1σ bands were marked to show the allowed range in V_1/V_2.
  4. [§5.2] The statement that 'other sets of physical conditions could reproduce the observed line ratios, such as a higher T_e for component 1 and a higher n_e for component 2' would be more informative with a concrete example or a small grid; as written, the reader cannot judge the size of the degeneracy.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the single-phase rejection is an independent model-grid result, and the two-component model is explicitly non-unique, non-predictive, and transparently constructed.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the observed [OIII]88/5008 and [OIII]4364/5008 ratios of COS-2987 cannot be reproduced by a homogeneous ionized gas with a single electron density and temperature. This claim is established by comparing the observed ratios with PyNeb model grids computed over a wide range of Te and ne, with no free parameters fitted to the target. That comparison is self-contained and does not reduce to anything the paper has assumed. The subsequent two-component model is presented as a toy model, with the paper explicitly stating: 'The aim of this analysis is not to determine best-fit parameters, but rather to assess whether the observed [Oiii] luminosity ratios can be reproduced within the framework of a density-stratified ionized ISM.' The component properties (Te,1, ne,1) = (26,000 K, 500 cm^-3) and (Te,2, ne,2) = (8,000 K, 50 cm^-3) are hand-picked, and the paper explicitly acknowledges non-uniqueness: 'We stress again that the specific combination of Te, ne, and V1/V2 parameters presented above is not a unique solution.' The derived volume ratio V1/V2 ~ 1/300 is therefore a consistency-check quantity, not an independent prediction, and the paper does not present it as a test. This is a modeling limitation or underdetermination concern, not circularity. Self-citations to companion papers (e.g., Mawatari et al. 2025) provide data-reduction details and supporting estimates such as f_esc, but the line fluxes and ratios analyzed here are measured and tabulated in this paper (Table 1), so the central diagnostic does not rest on a self-citation chain. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no known result is merely renamed. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The qualitative conclusion (single-phase homogeneous models fail) is supported by the data and PyNeb grids with only standard atomic physics. The quantitative parameters of the two-component model (T_e, n_e, V1/V2) are free parameters chosen by hand and fitted to the two observed ratios, and the assumed O++/H+ ratio is not independently constrained. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • T_e,1 (hot dense component electron temperature) = 26,000 K
    Chosen by hand so that the two-component model reproduces the observed [OIII] ratios (Section 5.2); the paper states the solution is not unique.
  • n_e,1 (hot dense component electron density) = 500 cm^-3
    Chosen by hand; degeneracy with T_e,1 noted in Section 5.2.
  • T_e,2 (cool diffuse component electron temperature) = 8,000 K
    Chosen by hand; other pairs of (T_e, n_e) could also reproduce the data.
  • n_e,2 (cool diffuse component electron density) = 50 cm^-3
    Chosen by hand to match the observed [OIII] ratios.
  • V1/V2 (volume ratio) = 1/300
    Derived by matching the two-component model ratios to the observed ratios (Figure 4, top right); effectively a fitted value given the hand-picked component properties.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Case B recombination for H-alpha/H-beta and SMC extinction curve with R_V=2.74
    Used to derive A_V from the Balmer decrement (Section 3.1, Eq. 1).
  • domain assumption PyNeb atomic data and the Campbell et al. (1986) relation Te([OII]) = 0.7 Te([OIII]) + 3000 K
    Used to estimate Te([OII]) from Te([OIII]) (Section 3.2).
  • domain assumption The [OIII] lines originate only from O++ gas in HII regions, with no AGN or shock contribution
    The two-component model attributes all [OIII] emission to photoionized gas (Section 5.2).
  • ad hoc to paper O++/H+ = 10^-4 in both components
    Assumed to compute emissivities (Eq. 4); not tied to the measured metallicity and not varied between components.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of RIOJA. JWST and ALMA unveil the inhomogeneous and complex ISM structure in a star-forming galaxy at $z=6.81$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4RLFANNQ

@misc{pith2026250702054,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: RIOJA. JWST and ALMA unveil the inhomogeneous and complex ISM structure in a star-forming galaxy at $z=6.81$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4RLFANNQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.02054}
}
abstract

We report the discovery of a complex, density-stratified interstellar medium (ISM) in the star-forming galaxy COS-2987 at $z = 6.81$, revealed by the unprecedented synergy between JWST/NIRSpec IFS and ALMA observations. These observations detect key emission lines, including \oii~$\lambda\lambda$~3727, 3730, \oiii~4364, \oiii~$\lambda\lambda$~4960, 5008, \oiii\ 88 \micron, as well as H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$. JWST spectroscopy alone indicates ISM properties that are typical for galaxies at $z\sim7$. These include low dust extinction ($A_{\rm V} \approx 0.14$ mag), moderate electron density ($n_{\rm e} \approx 500$~cm$^{-3}$), and low gas-phase metallicity ($\sim10\%$). However, the strong far-infrared \oiii\ 88 \micron\ emission detected by ALMA cannot be explained by a single-component ionized medium with uniform electron density and temperature. Instead, a two-component ISM model, comprising compact, high-temperature, high-density gas components ($T_e \approx 26,000$\,K; $n_e \approx 600~\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$) and an extended, cooler, lower-density component ($T_e \approx 8,000$\,K; $n_e \approx 50~\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$), successfully reproduces the observed line ratios of \oiii~88~\micron/\oiii~5008~\AA\ and \oiii~4364/\oiii~5008~\AA, with a volume ratio of 1 : 300 between the two components. Our results demonstrate that JWST alone probes only a fraction of the ISM and highlight the critical importance of combining JWST and ALMA to reveal the density-stratified ISM of early galaxies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.02054 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Left) Integrated intensity map of the NIRSpec [O iii]5008 emission. The red contours show the ±2 nσ significance levels (n = 1, 2, 3, . . .), where σ = 1.16 × 10−20 erg s−1 cm−2 pixel−1 . Positive and negative contours are shown by the solid and dashed lines, respectively. The orange circle at the bottom left indicates the FWHM of 0. ′′21 at the observed wavelength of Hα (5.125 µm). (Right) One-dimensional spectra … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Redshift evolution of the electron density ne. The red star indicates the electron density of COS-2987, de￾rived from the [O ii] ratio. Literature data at z ∼ 0–3 are compiled from Sanders et al. (2016) ([S ii] or [O ii]) and Davies et al. (2021) ([S ii]), while data at z ≳ 4 are taken from Isobe et al. (2023), Abdurro’uf et al. (2024), and Mar￾concini et al. (2024), all based on the [O ii] ratios. Filled symbols re… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (Left) Diagnostic diagram of the [O iii] line ratios overlaid with Te–ne model grids generated using PyNeb (Luridiana et al. 2015). The red star indicates the observed [O iii] line ratios of COS-2987 ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Top left) Same as the left panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Extremely UV-bright starbursts at the end of cosmic reionization

    astro-ph.GA 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Very UV-bright galaxies at z~6 are ~6-Myr-old starbursts with high ionizing-photon efficiency, and one example shows evidence that dusty outflows push dust beyond the stars and boost its UV brightness.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    L., Coe, D., et al

    Abdurro’uf, Larson, R. L., Coe, D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6001 ´Alvarez-M´ arquez, J., Crespo G´ omez, A., Colina, L., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A250, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451731

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6001 2024

  2. [2]

    2024, A&A, 688, A146, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348824

    Arribas, S., Perna, M., Rodr ´ ıguez Del Pino, B., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A146, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348824

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348824 2024

  3. [3]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222

    arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    Compilation of Technical Papers on ALMA Receivers

    Bakx, T., & Conway, J. 2024, Compilation of Technical Papers on ALMA Receivers, ALMA Memo Series, 627, 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.02164

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.02164 2024

  5. [5]

    Bakx, T. J. L. C., Tamura, Y., Hashimoto, T., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 4294, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa509 B¨ oker, T., Arribas, S., L¨ utzgendorf, N., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142589 B¨ oker, T., Beck, T. L., Birkmann, S. M., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 038001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acb846 ISM Physical Properties of COS-298703024715

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa509 2020

  6. [6]

    2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.14.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6984365

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.14.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6984365

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.6984365 2024

  7. [7]

    1986, MNRAS, 223, 811, doi: 10.1093/mnras/223.4.811

    Campbell, A., Terlevich, R., & Melnick, J. 1986, MNRAS, 223, 811, doi: 10.1093/mnras/223.4.811

    doi:10.1093/mnras/223.4.811 1986

  8. [8]

    2009, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:0912.1303, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0912.1303

    Cappellari, M. 2009, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:0912.1303, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0912.1303

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0912.1303 2009

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    2003, MNRAS, 342, 345, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06541.x CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al

    Cappellari, M., & Copin, Y. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 345, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06541.x CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    2003

  2. [10]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 771, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01953-7

    Chen, Y., Jones, T., Sanders, R., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 771, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01953-7

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    L., et al

    Chen, Y., Jones, T., Sanders, R. L., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.18476, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.18476

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    2024, MNRAS, 529, 3751, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae776

    Choustikov, N., Katz, H., Saxena, A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 3751, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae776

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    C., Lebouteiller, V., et al

    Cormier, D., Madden, S. C., Lebouteiller, V., et al. 2015, A&A, 578, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425207

    2015 doi

  6. [14]

    P., Hony, S., et al

    Cormier, D., Abel, N. P., Hony, S., et al. 2019, A&A, 626, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834457

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    A., Schnurr, O., Hirschi, R., et al

    Crowther, P. A., Schnurr, O., Hirschi, R., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 731, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17167.x

    2010

  8. [16]

    2024, A&A, 684, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346698

    Curti, M., Maiolino, R., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346698

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    L., F¨ orster Schreiber, N

    Davies, R. L., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., Genzel, R., et al. 2021, ApJ, 909, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd551

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    L., Lester, D

    Dinerstein, H. L., Lester, D. F., & Werner, M. W. 1985, ApJ, 291, 561, doi: 10.1086/163096

    1985 doi

  11. [19]

    Draine, B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    2011

  12. [20]

    2024, ApJ, 964, 146, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad235c

    Fujimoto, S., Ouchi, M., Nakajima, K., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 146, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad235c

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    P., Mather, J

    Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Abbott, R., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 068001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Misselt, K. A., Landolt, A. U., & Wolff, M. J. 2003, ApJ, 594, 279, doi: 10.1086/376774

    2003 doi

  15. [23]

    K., et al

    Hagimoto, M., Tamura, Y., Inoue, A. K., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.20734, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.20734

    2025 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    K., et al

    Harikane, Y., Ouchi, M., Inoue, A. K., et al. 2020, ApJ, 896, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab94bd

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    K., Ellis, R

    Harikane, Y., Inoue, A. K., Ellis, R. S., et al. 2025a, ApJ, 980, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9b2c

    doi

  18. [26]

    L., Ellis, R., et al

    Harikane, Y., Sanders, R. L., Ellis, R., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.09186, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.09186

    doi

  19. [27]

    S., et al

    Harshan, A., Tripodi, R., Martis, N. S., et al. 2024, ApJL, 977, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad9741

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    2018, Nature, 557, 392, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0117-z

    Hashimoto, T., Laporte, N., Mawatari, K., et al. 2018, Nature, 557, 392, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0117-z

    2018 doi

  21. [29]

    2023, ApJL, 955, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf57c

    Hashimoto, T., ´Alvarez-M´ arquez, J., Fudamoto, Y., et al. 2023, ApJL, 955, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf57c

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    M., Borthakur, S., Overzier, R., et al

    Heckman, T. M., Borthakur, S., Overzier, R., et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, 5, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/5

    2011 doi

  23. [31]

    K., Tamura, Y., Matsuo, H., et al

    Inoue, A. K., Tamura, Y., Matsuo, H., et al. 2016, Science, 352, 1559, doi: 10.1126/science.aaf0714

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    2023, ApJ, 956, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    Isobe, Y., Ouchi, M., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 956, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    2024, MNRAS, 535, 881, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2375

    Ji, X., ¨Ubler, H., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 881, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2375

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    2020, ApJ, 903, 150, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb943

    Jones, T., Sanders, R., Roberts-Borsani, G., et al. 2020, ApJ, 903, 150, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb943

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    2011, PASJ, 63, 903, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.4.903

    Kawada, M., Takahashi, A., Yasuda, A., et al. 2011, PASJ, 63, 903, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.4.903

    2011 doi

  28. [36]

    J., Nicholls, D

    Kewley, L. J., Nicholls, D. C., Sutherland, R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 880, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab16ed

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    2023, MNRAS, 521, 2526, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad687

    Killi, M., Watson, D., Fujimoto, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 2526, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad687

    2023 doi

  30. [38]

    2024, MNRAS, 529, 781, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae252

    Kumari, N., Smit, R., Leitherer, C., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 781, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae252

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    S., et al

    Laporte, N., Nakajima, K., Ellis, R. S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 851, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa96a8

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    H., Maseda, M

    Laseter, I. H., Maseda, M. V., Curti, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347133

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    2022, A&A, 667, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243865

    Lebouteiller, V., & Ramambason, L. 2022, A&A, 667, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243865

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    C., et al

    Lebouteiller, V., Cormier, D., Madden, S. C., et al. 2012, A&A, 548, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201218859

    2012 doi

  35. [43]

    2013, A&A, 553, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118370

    Leitet, E., Bergvall, N., Hayes, M., Linn´ e, S., & Zackrisson, E. 2013, A&A, 553, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118370

    2013 doi

  36. [44]

    Luridiana, V., Morisset, C., & Shaw, R. A. 2015, A&A, 573, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323152

    2015 doi

  37. [45]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.08616, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.08616

    Marconcini, C., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.08616, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.08616

    2024 doi arXiv

  38. [46]

    A., Perna, M., Willott, C

    Marshall, M. A., Perna, M., Willott, C. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A191, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346113

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.02053, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.02053

    Mawatari, K., Costantin, L., Usui, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.02053, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.02053

    2025 doi

  40. [48]

    L., Arellano-C´ ordova, K

    Mingozzi, M., James, B. L., Arellano-C´ ordova, K. Z., et al. 2022, ApJ, 939, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac952c

    2022 doi

  41. [49]

    2024, ApJ, 971, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5290 16Usui et al

    Morishita, T., Stiavelli, M., Grillo, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5290 16Usui et al

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    2023, ApJS, 269, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556

    Nakajima, K., Ouchi, M., Isobe, Y., et al. 2023, ApJS, 269, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    2023, ApJ, 953, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace25a

    Nakazato, Y., Yoshida, N., & Ceverino, D. 2023, ApJ, 953, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace25a

    2023 doi

  44. [52]

    E., & Ferland, G

    Osterbrock, D. E., & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  45. [53]

    2023, A&A, 679, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346649

    Perna, M., Arribas, S., Marshall, M., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346649

    2023 doi

  46. [54]

    C., Aravena, M., Gonz´ alez-L´ opez, J., et al

    Posses, A. C., Aravena, M., Gonz´ alez-L´ opez, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A46, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243399

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    2022a, A&A, 667, A35, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243866 —

    Ramambason, L., Lebouteiller, V., Bik, A., et al. 2022a, A&A, 667, A35, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243866 —. 2022b, A&A, 667, A35, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243866

    doi

  48. [56]

    W., Fudamoto, Y., Inoue, A

    Ren, Y. W., Fudamoto, Y., Inoue, A. K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 945, 69, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb8ab

    2023 doi

  49. [57]

    E., Wold, I

    Rhoads, J. E., Wold, I. G. B., Harish, S., et al. 2023, ApJL, 942, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acaaaf

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    R., Vieira, J

    Rigby, J. R., Vieira, J. D., Phadke, K. A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7501

    2025 doi

  51. [59]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Topping, M. W., Reddy, N. A., & Brammer, G. B. 2024, ApJ, 962, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad15fc

    2024 doi

  52. [60]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Kriek, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 816, 23, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/23

    2016 doi

  53. [61]

    2022, A&A, 665, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244556

    Schaerer, D., Marques-Chaves, R., Barrufet, L., et al. 2022, A&A, 665, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244556

    2022 doi

  54. [62]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525, doi: 10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  55. [63]

    2025, MNRAS, 539, 2463, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf518

    Scholtz, J., Curti, M., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 2463, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf518

    2025 doi

  56. [64]

    2008, in Ninteenth International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology, ed

    Sekimoto, Y., Iizuko, Y., Satou, N., et al. 2008, in Ninteenth International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology, ed. W. Wild, 253–257

    2008

  57. [65]

    P., et al

    Senchyna, P., Plat, A., Stark, D. P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad235e

    2024 doi

  58. [66]

    J., Franx, M., et al

    Smit, R., Bouwens, R. J., Franx, M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 122, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/122

    2015 doi

  59. [67]

    J., Carniani, S., et al

    Smit, R., Bouwens, R. J., Carniani, S., et al. 2018, Nature, 553, 178, doi: 10.1038/nature24631 Stasi´ nska, G. 1982, A&AS, 48, 299

    2018 doi

  60. [68]

    2023, ApJL, 957, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0159

    Stiavelli, M., Morishita, T., Chiaberge, M., et al. 2023, ApJL, 957, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0159

    2023 doi

  61. [69]

    2025, ApJ, 981, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb02a

    Sugahara, Y., ´Alvarez-M´ arquez, J., Hashimoto, T., et al. 2025, ApJ, 981, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb02a

    2025 doi

  62. [70]

    Tamura, Y., C. Bakx, T. J. L., Inoue, A. K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd637

    2023 doi

  63. [71]

    K., Hashimoto, T., et al

    Tokuoka, T., Inoue, A. K., Hashimoto, T., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 933, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac7447

    2022 doi

  64. [72]

    W., Stark, D

    Topping, M. W., Stark, D. P., Senchyna, P., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, 225, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada95c ¨Ubler, H., Maiolino, R., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346137

    2025 doi

  65. [73]

    2024, A&A, 686, A185, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449184

    Upadhyaya, A., Marques-Chaves, R., Schaerer, D., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A185, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449184

    2024 doi

  66. [74]

    K., et al

    Ura, R., Hashimoto, T., Inoue, A. K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 948, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc530

    2023 doi

  67. [75]

    Vink, J. S. 2023, A&A, 679, L9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347827

    2023 doi

  68. [76]

    S., Heger, A., Krumholz, M

    Vink, J. S., Heger, A., Krumholz, M. R., et al. 2015, Highlights of Astronomy, 16, 51, doi: 10.1017/S1743921314004657

    2015 doi

  69. [77]

    M., Hutchison, T

    Welch, B., Olivier, G. M., Hutchison, T. A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 196, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad79ec

    2024 doi

  70. [78]

    2022, MNRAS, 515, 1751, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1905

    Witstok, J., Smit, R., Maiolino, R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 1751, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1905

    2022 doi

  71. [79]

    Wootten, A., & Thompson, A. R. 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE, 97, 1463, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2017105

    2009

  72. [80]

    2020, MNRAS, 499, 3417, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3000

    Yang, S., & Lidz, A. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 3417, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3000

    2020 doi

  73. [81]

    A., Castellano, M., Akins, H

    Zavala, J. A., Castellano, M., Akins, H. B., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 155, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02397-3

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.