Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 43 references

IMASHRIMP: Automatic White Shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) Biometrical Analysis from Laboratory Images Using Computer Vision and Deep Learning

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A pose-estimation system predicts 23 key points on a shrimp's body from a single RGBD image and regresses those pixel distances to centimeters, achieving an average error of 0.07 ± 0.1 cm across all morphological traits.

desk verdict Useful engineering work on shrimp phenotyping, but the headline 0.07 cm MAE is unverifiable as written because the SVM regression train/test protocol is never specified. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.02519 v1 pith:TSVHZEXT submitted 2025-07-03 cs.CV

Abiam Remache González , Meriem Chagour , Timon Bijan Rüth , Raúl Trapiella Cañedo , Marina Martínez Soler , Álvaro Lorenzo Felipe , Hyun-Suk Shin , María-Jesús Zamorano Serrano
show 7 more authors
Ricardo Torres Juan-Antonio Castillo Parra Eduardo Reyes Abad Miguel-Ángel Ferrer Ballester Juan-Manuel Afonso López Francisco-Mario Hernández Tejera Adrian Penate-Sanchez
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV MSC 68T4568T07
keywords ShrimpsizeestimationPenaeusvannameiGeneticassessmentPoseComputervisionDeeplearningRGBDimagingMorphologicaltraits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

IMASHRIMP is a computer-vision system that automatically measures 23 morphological traits of white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) from single RGBD images, replacing manual measurements used in genetic selection programs. The system couples a pose-estimation network that locates 23 key points on the shrimp's body with a per-trait regression model that converts pixel distances into centimeters, reporting an average error of 0.07 ± 0.1 cm across all traits. Two verification classifiers check the human operator's labels for image view and rostrum integrity, reducing human error in those labels from 0.97% to 0% and from 12.46% to 3.64%, respectively. If the reported accuracy holds, breeders could evaluate far more shrimp per generation, faster and with fewer transcription mistakes.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the virtual skeleton: 23 key points placed at the start and end of each morphological measurement, with one skeleton for the lateral view and one for the dorsal view. The pose estimator adapts the VitPose vision-transformer encoder/decoder to predict these points from RGBD images, using separate networks for lateral and dorsal views, while a modified ResNet-50 provides the two binary classifiers (view and rostrum integrity). The pixel-to-centimeter conversion is carried out by a Support Vector Regression model fitted separately for each of the 22 measurements, learned from paired pixel distances and manual centimeter measurements.

What would settle it

Image a rigid object of known dimensions, or shrimp measured by an independent calibrated 3D scanner, with the same 30 cm zenithal camera and run the full pipeline. If the predicted traits deviate from the known values by more than the reported 0.07 ± 0.1 cm mean absolute error, the claim that the system measures true morphology rather than reproducing the manual labels is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that measuring a shrimp can be reformulated as a keypoint-detection problem: a network predicts the coordinates of 23 anatomically defined points (a lateral skeleton or a dorsal skeleton), every trait is computed as a distance between two of those points, and a Support Vector Regression converts those pixel distances into centimeters. On a test set of 1236 images, the full system achieves a mean average precision of 93.12% for keypoint detection and a pixel-to-centimeter mean absolute error of 0.07 ± 0.10 cm, outperforming the ruler-scaling baseline of 0.13 ± 0.19 cm. The paper further claims this is the first application of pose estimation to shrimp, and that its two-factor authentication scheme—human annotation plus an AI classifier—cuts human error in view classification to zero and reduces rostrum-integrity errors from 12.46% to 3.64%.

Load-bearing premise

The manual measurements recorded during image capture are treated as ground truth for fitting and evaluating the regression, so the 0.07 cm error shows how well the system reproduces those human labels, not how close either is to true physical length.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the 0.07 cm average error holds in routine use, breeders can replace manual caliper measurements with automated image-based phenotyping for thousands of shrimp per selection cycle.
  • Because all 23 traits come from the same image, genetic selection indices based on multiple correlated morphological traits can be computed without additional photography.
  • The two-factor authentication scheme offers a template for any data-entry pipeline where a cheap classifier can catch human labeling mistakes.
  • The per-trait regression conversion beats ruler scaling, indicating that learned conversion is the better default when the camera setup is fixed and a 3D object is imaged in 2D.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the manual measurements recorded at capture time are the training and evaluation labels, the reported error measures agreement with that human process; an independent validation against a calibrated 3D scanner would show whether the system tracks true physical length.
  • The same pose-estimation-plus-regression pipeline should transfer to other farmed crustaceans or fish with defined anatomical landmarks, requiring only a modest annotated dataset.
  • A natural stress test is to quantify performance at the 40 cm and 60 cm camera distances that the paper shows only qualitatively, since the regression was fitted at the fixed 30 cm setup.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents IMASHRIMP, a pipeline for automatic morphological analysis of white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) from single RGB-D images. The system combines two ResNet-50-based binary discriminators (lateral/dorsal view and rostrum integrity), a ViTPose-derived keypoint estimator predicting 23-keypoint virtual skeletons for lateral and dorsal views, and per-trait SVM regressors that convert pixel-based distances into centimeters. The authors report a human-AI two-factor authentication that reduces view-classification human error from 0.97% to 0% and rostrum-integrity error from 12.46% to 3.64%, a pose-estimation mAP of 93.12% (or 97.94% in the abstract), and a pixel-to-centimeter conversion MAE of 0.07 ± 0.1 cm with regression versus 0.13 ± 0.19 cm with ruler-based scaling. The code is publicly available on GitHub.

Significance. If the reported performance is reproducible and generalizes, IMASHRIMP would be a useful contribution to aquaculture phenotyping: it addresses a real operational need in genetic breeding programs, uses a relatively large annotated dataset (12,367 images, 1,030 individuals) spanning 23 morphological traits, and provides a concrete baseline comparison against ruler-based scaling. The two-factor human-AI authentication idea is simple and practical, and the availability of code is a strength. However, the central quantitative claim for the regression module rests on an incompletely specified evaluation protocol, and several internal numerical inconsistencies must be resolved before the results can be taken at face value.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.4, Table 4] The SVM regression evaluation protocol is not specified. The text does not state whether the 1,236 test images, or the 1,030 specimens behind them, were held out from fitting the SVM regressors, nor does it describe the train/test split or any cross-validation. Because each animal contributes 12 images (Section 5.1), an image-level split could place the same individual on both sides of the split, allowing within-individual correlation to inflate the reported advantage of regression (0.07 ± 0.1 cm) over ruler scaling (0.13 ± 0.19 cm). Please specify the split, preferably by individual, and report results on data never used in regression fitting.
  2. [Abstract vs. §6.2, Conclusion] The abstract reports a pose estimation mAP of 97.94%, but Table 2 and the conclusion report a general mAP of 93.12% on the 1,236-image test set. The value 97.94% does not appear in Table 2 or elsewhere in the results section. This discrepancy affects the paper's headline claim and must be resolved by identifying the correct number and reporting it consistently.
  3. [§6.1.2] The rostrum-discriminator results are internally inconsistent: the text states that the two-factor system made 45 failures on the 1,236 test images, corresponding to a percentage error of 3.64% (45/1236), but the text reports 'a percentage error of 4.64%.' The abstract and conclusion report 3.64%, so the 4.64% figure appears to be a typographical error; it should be corrected.
  4. [§5.1, §5.4] The manual measurements are used both as the target for fitting the SVM regressors and as the reference for evaluating them. Even with a clean train/test split by individual, the reported MAE therefore measures agreement with the human measurement process rather than true physical accuracy; any systematic bias in the manual labels would be inherited by the system. The paper should state this limitation explicitly and, if possible, validate on an independent physical reference (for example, repeated caliper measurements by a second operator or a known calibration object).
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] There are several typographical issues: 'Penaeus vannamei}' contains a stray brace, 'whiteshrimp' is missing a space, and 'The code are available' should be 'The code is available.'
  2. [§1, list of contributions] The third bullet contains an editorial note to the authors ('Not only lenght, but also height and widht. Maybe is better usedorsal? To be consistent with the rest of the paper') that should be removed before publication.
  3. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical and grammatical errors, including 'c entimetres', 'abilinear', the duplicated phrase 'Shrimp selective breeding.', 'virtual virtual skeleton', and 'lenght'/'widht'. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  4. [§6.2, Table 2] Table 2 reports 'General' mAP as 93.12, while the conclusion text also gives 93.12 for the test set; please state explicitly that this is the overall mAP on the 1,236 test images and reconcile it with the abstract's 97.94%.
  5. [§6.1.1] The text says 'Of the 12367 ground truth labels, human researchers made 106 errors (0.85%),' but Table 1 reports 12 human errors (0.97%) on the 1,236-image test subset. Please clarify that the 106 errors are on the full annotated set, and that Table 1's percentages refer to the test subset.
  6. [Table 4] The row labeled 'total' in Table 4 has MAE 0.51 ± 0.76 cm with regression, while the 'General' row has MAE 0.07 ± 0.1 cm; this could confuse readers. Clarify that 'total' is the total-length morphological variable and 'General' is the mean over all traits.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No demonstrated circularity: the pixel-to-cm SVM is supervised calibration, and the under-specified test split is a validation-reporting issue, not a definitional loop.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular on the available text. The system is composed of standard supervised modules: ResNet-50 discriminators, a VitPose-based keypoint estimator, and per-measurement SVM regressions that map pixel distances to manual centimetre labels. The manual measurements are an external reference (the operational definition of the morphological traits), not the model's own output, so using them as the regression target and as the evaluation reference is a normal supervised-learning setup. The claim that regression beats ruler scaling (0.07 vs 0.13 cm MAE) is meaningful only if the SVM is evaluated on a disjoint held-out set; the paper says a 1236-image test subset validates the entire system and that regressors are learned from training samples, but it does not explicitly state the SVM train/test split. If the same images or individuals were used for fitting and evaluation, the 0.07 figure would be in-sample error rather than prediction; that is a genuine evaluation-reporting gap in Sections 5.4 and 6.3, not a circular derivation. The 'two-factor authentication' error reductions are transparent set-theoretic intersections of human and AI errors, not fitted predictions. Self-citations to the group's genetic-parameter papers provide domain context for which traits matter but do not carry the methodological derivation. No step reduces by construction to its own input, so no circularity is established.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The pipeline is built from off-the-shelf learning components; the central measurement conversion is a fitted SVM, and the pose networks are trained models. No new physical entities are proposed beyond the virtual keypoint skeleton, which is an annotation schema without independent external evidence. The main assumptions are the reliability of manual ground truth, linearity of the pixel-to-cm mapping, and the representative nature of the controlled lab setup.

free parameters (3)
  • SVM regression coefficients per morphological variable = 22 variables, values not reported
    The central pixel-to-cm conversion is a linear model D3D = D2D * alpha + beta learned for each of 22 measurements from manual ground truth, as described in sections 4.3 and 5.4.
  • ViTPose network weights (lateral and dorsal) = trained on 12,367 images, weights not released
    Keypoint predictions that feed all measurements depend entirely on these fitted weights, initialized from MS-COCO, MPII, and AI Challenger pretraining as described in section 4.2.
  • ResNet-50 discriminator weights = trained for 5 epochs, weights not released
    View and rostrum classification used to route images and trigger human alerts are fitted models as described in section 5.2.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Per-measurement linearity: D3D = D2D * alpha + beta holds for each morphological variable.
    The regression module assumes a pixel-to-cm mapping that is linear within the fixed setup; nonlinear distortions are not modeled, as stated in section 4.3.
  • domain assumption Manual ground truth is unbiased and reliable.
    Both training and evaluation use human-recorded measurements and CVAT keypoint annotations as truth; any bias is inherited, as described in section 5.1.
  • domain assumption Fixed capture geometry is sufficient for generalization.
    All test metrics come from the same lab rig with a camera at 30 cm, black background, and uniform lighting; the paper only qualitatively demonstrates other settings in Figure 7.
  • standard math SVR optimization and ViTPose architecture are correct and applicable.
    The paper relies on Vapnik's SVR and transformer pose estimation as off-the-shelf tools without deriving them, as cited in sections 4.2 and 4.3.
  • domain assumption Pretrained human pose weights transfer to shrimp.
    The encoder pretrained on MS-COCO, MPII, and AI Challenger is assumed to provide useful features for shrimp keypoints; if transfer fails, training from only 12,367 images may be insufficient, as discussed in section 4.2.
invented entities (1)
  • Shrimp virtual skeleton with 23 keypoints (lateral and dorsal variants)
    purpose: Defines the morphological measurement points and enables pose-estimation training; broken-rostrum cases use 22 keypoints.
    This is an annotation and representation design introduced by the authors, not an independently evidenced physical structure; its utility is demonstrated only by the reported results in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of IMASHRIMP: Automatic White Shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) Biometrical Analysis from Laboratory Images Using Computer Vision and Deep Learning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TSVHZEXT

@misc{pith2026250702519,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: IMASHRIMP: Automatic White Shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) Biometrical Analysis from Laboratory Images Using Computer Vision and Deep Learning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TSVHZEXT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.02519}
}
read the original abstract

This paper introduces IMASHRIMP, an adapted system for the automated morphological analysis of white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei}, aimed at optimizing genetic selection tasks in aquaculture. Existing deep learning and computer vision techniques were modified to address the specific challenges of shrimp morphology analysis from RGBD images. IMASHRIMP incorporates two discrimination modules, based on a modified ResNet-50 architecture, to classify images by the point of view and determine rostrum integrity. It is proposed a "two-factor authentication (human and IA)" system, it reduces human error in view classification from 0.97% to 0% and in rostrum detection from 12.46% to 3.64%. Additionally, a pose estimation module was adapted from VitPose to predict 23 key points on the shrimp's skeleton, with separate networks for lateral and dorsal views. A morphological regression module, using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) model, was integrated to convert pixel measurements to centimeter units. Experimental results show that the system effectively reduces human error, achieving a mean average precision (mAP) of 97.94% for pose estimation and a pixel-to-centimeter conversion error of 0.07 (+/- 0.1) cm. IMASHRIMP demonstrates the potential to automate and accelerate shrimp morphological analysis, enhancing the efficiency of genetic selection and contributing to more sustainable aquaculture practices.The code are available at https://github.com/AbiamRemacheGonzalez/ImaShrimp-public

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.02519 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Description of the key point virtual skeleton used by our shrimp pose estimator and the measurements performed on the animal used for genetic improvement. Top row: the image on the left shows the ground truth virtual skeleton used by our method, while the image on the right shows the prediction by our neural network. Middle row: on the left, we can see the error between the ground truth and our estimations. The imag… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Description of the dorsal key point virtual skeleton used by our shrimp pose estimator. First row: Ground truth virtual skeleton used by our method, with measures in cen￾timetres. Second row: prediction of our neural network pose estimation with measures in centimetres. Third row: Error between the ground truth and our estimations in centimetres. Fourth row: Heatmaps produced by the neural network for each point. am… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of the proposed method for shrimp pose estimation and size regression. The image shows the architecture of our approach. First, images go through the discriminators to check if the human assessment and the AI assessment is coherent. Based on the view point, two different keypoint virtual skeletons are detected, one for dorsal images and a different one for lateral images. If the rostrum is present or not, t… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Description of the key point virtual skeletons (lateral and dorsal) and the extracted morphological measurements. First row: Shrimp lateral key point virtual skeleton, key points 1 to 9 can be identified (red points), representing morphological variables of length. key…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Image acquisition setup and methodology. All shrimp were capturing in four degrees 0°, 90°, 180° and 270°.First row: Capture of images of the shrimp’s right lateral point of view at all degrees. Second row: Capture of images of the shrimp’s left lateral point of view a…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Example output images for the proposed system in test dataset, in which classify information, key points and specimen morphological variables in centimetres are shown for each detected shrimp instance. The images show several results of the test dataset depending on th…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Example output images for the proposed system in a different evaluation dataset, in which classify information and key points are shown for each detected shrimp instance. The images show several results depending on the experiment: First and second row: Different backg…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , author Lee, I

    author Ana, N. , author Lee, I. , author Dulce, S. , author Henríquez Rodríguez, P. , author A., F. , author Morales, A. , author Soula, M. , author Rodrigo, B. , author Negrín-Báez, D. , author Zamorano, M. , author Ha, M. , year 2016 . title Imafish\_ml: A fully-automated image analysis software for assessing fish morphometric traits on gilthead seabrea...

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    , author Pishchulin, L

    author Andriluka, M. , author Pishchulin, L. , author Gehler, P. , author Schiele, B. , year 2014 . title 2d human pose estimation: New benchmark and state of the art analysis , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , organization IEEE . pp. pages 3686--3693

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    , author Zhou, C

    author Bolya, D. , author Zhou, C. , author Xiao, F. , author Lee, Y.J. , year 2019 . title Yolact: Real-time instance segmentation . journal 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages 9156--9165

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    , author Hidalgo, G

    author Cao, Z. , author Hidalgo, G. , author Simon, T. , author Wei, S.E. , author Sheikh, Y. , year 2021 . title Openpose: Realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields . journal IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence volume 43 , pages 172--186

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    , year 2021

    author Chao Zhou, Guowei Yang, L.S. , year 2021 . title Counting, locating, and sizing of shrimp larvae based on density map regression . journal Aquaculture and Fisheries volume 6 , pages 371--380

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    , author Mukviboonchai, S

    author Chirdchoo, N. , author Mukviboonchai, S. , author Cheunta, W. , year 2024 . title A deep learning model for estimating body weight of live pacific white shrimp in a clay pond shrimp aquaculture . journal Intelligent Systems with Applications volume 24 , pages 200434

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    , author Galán-Cuenca, A

    author Climent-Perez, P. , author Galán-Cuenca, A. , author Garcia-d’Urso, N.E. , author Saval-Calvo, M. , author Azorin-Lopez, J. , author Fuster-Guillo, A. , year 2024 . title Simultaneous, vision-based fish instance segmentation, species classification and size regression . journal PeerJ Computer Science volume 10

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    , author Li, Z

    author Dong, Q. , author Li, Z. , author Yu, X. , year 2023 . title Detection-regression based framework for fish keypoints detection . journal IMTS , pages 1--5

    work page 2023

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    , author Beyer, L

    author Dosovitskiy, A. , author Beyer, L. , author Kolesnikov, A. , author Weissenborn, D. , author Zhai, X. , author Unterthiner, T. , author Dehghani, M. , author Minderer, M. , author Heigold, G. , author Gelly, S. , author Uszkoreit, J. , author Houlsby, N. , year 2021 . t...

    2021

  2. [10]

    title The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024: Blue Transformation in Action

    author Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) , year 2024 . title The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024: Blue Transformation in Action . publisher FAO , address Rome, Italy . https://doi.org/10.4060/cc9420en

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    , author Prados, R

    author Garcia, R. , author Prados, R. , author Quintana, J. , author Tempelaar, A. , author Gracias, N. , author Rosen, S. , author Vågstøl, H. , author Løvall, K. , year 2019 . title Automatic segmentation of fish using deep learning with application to fish size measurement ...

    2019

  4. [12]

    , author Pérez-Rodríguez, E

    author García-Santamaría, R. , author Pérez-Rodríguez, E. , author Pascual, D. , author García, D. , year 2022 . title Automatic, operational, high-resolution monitoring of fish length and catch composition from fish auctions using computer vision . journal Fisheries Research ...

    2022

  5. [13]

    , author Widodo, C

    author Hadiyanto, H. , author Widodo, C. , year 2022 . title Shrimp body weight estimation in aquaculture ponds using morphometric features based on underwater image analysis and machine learning approach . journal Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle volume 36 , pages 905--912

    2022

  6. [14]

    , year 2007

    author Harbitz, A. , year 2007 . title Estimation of shrimp (pandalus borealis) carapace length by image analysis . journal Ices Journal of Marine Science - ICES J MAR SCI volume 64 , pages 939--944

    2007

  7. [15]

    , author Gkioxari, G

    author He, K. , author Gkioxari, G. , author Doll \'a r, P. , author Girshick, R.B. , year 2017 . title Mask r-cnn . journal 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages 2980--2988

    2017

  8. [16]

    , author Zhang, X

    author He, K. , author Zhang, X. , author Ren, S. , author Sun, J. , year 2016 . title Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , in: booktitle Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , publisher IEEE . pp. pages 770--778 . :10.1109/C...

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    , author Li, Y

    author Huang, K. , author Li, Y. , author Suo, F. , author Xiang, J. , year 2020 . title Stereo vison and mask-rcnn segmentation based 3d points cloud matching for fish dimension measurement , in: booktitle 2020 39th Chinese Control Conference (CCC) , pp. pages 6345--6350

    2020

  10. [18]

    , author Papava, D

    author Ionescu, C. , author Papava, D. , author Olaru, V. , author Sminchisescu, C. , year 2014 . title Human3.6m: Large scale datasets and predictive methods for 3d human sensing in natural environments . journal IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence ...

    2014

  11. [19]

    , author Maire, M

    author Lin, T.Y. , author Maire, M. , author Belongie, S. , author Bourdev, L. , author Girshick, R. , author Hays, J. , author Perona, P. , author Ramanan, D. , author Zitnick, C.L. , author Dollár, P. , year 2015 . title Microsoft coco: Common objects in context . arXiv:1405...

    2015 arXiv

  12. [20]

    , author Zhang, Y

    author Liu, Y. , author Zhang, Y. , author Liu, S. , author Yang, X. , author Xu, Z. , author Jiang, S. , author Xu, D. , author Yuille, A.L. , author Roth, H.R. , year 2022 . title Semi-supervised medical image segmentation using cross-model pseudo-supervision , in: booktitle...

    2022

  13. [21]

    , author Klibaite, U

    author Marshall, J. , author Klibaite, U. , author Gellis, A. , author Aldarondo, D. , author Olveczky, B. , author Dunn, T.W. , year 2021 . title The pair-r24m dataset for multi-animal 3d pose estimation , in: editor Vanschoren, J. , editor Yeung, S. (Eds.), booktitle NeurIPS...

    2021

  14. [22]

    , author Shin, H.S

    author Martínez Soler , M. , author Shin, H.S. , author Álvaro Lorenzo-Felipe , author Zamorano Serrano , M.J. , author Ginés Ruiz , R. , author Pachón Mesa , L.C. , author González, D. , author Fernández Martín , J. , author Ramírez Artiles , J.S. , author Peñate Sánchez , A....

    2024

  15. [23]

    , year 2016

    author Moreno-Noguer, F. , year 2016 . title 3d human pose estimation from a single image via distance matrix regression . journal 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 1561--1570

    2016

  16. [24]

    , author Lee-Montero, I

    author Navarro, A. , author Lee-Montero, I. , author Santana, D. , author Henríquez, P. , author Ferrer, M.A. , author Morales, A. , author Soula, M. , author Badilla, R. , author Negrín-Báez, D. , author Zamorano, M.J. , author Afonso, J.M. , year 2016 . title Imafish\_ml: A ...

    2016

  17. [25]

    , author Divvala, S

    author Redmon, J. , author Divvala, S. , author Girshick, R.B. , author Farhadi, A. , year 2016 . title You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection . journal 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 779--788

    2016

  18. [26]

    , author Gang, F

    author Rong, D. , author Gang, F. , year 2024 . title Coordinate-corrected and graph-convolution-based hand pose estimation method . journal Sensors volume 24

    2024

  19. [27]

    , author Zuffi, S

    author Rueegg, N. , author Zuffi, S. , author Schindler, K. , author Black, M.J. , year 2022 . title Barc: Learning to regress 3d dog shape from images by exploiting breed information . journal 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages ...

    2022

  20. [28]

    , author Martínez-Soler, M

    author Shin, H. , author Martínez-Soler, M. , author Lorenzo-Felipe, A. , author Montachana-Chimborazo, M. , author Yugcha, E. , author Tomalá, M. , author Mujica-Rodríguez, K. , author Mero-Panta, E. , author Otaiza-Mejillón, J. , author Franco-Chiquito, N. , author Fernández...

    2020

  21. [29]

    , author Montachana Chimborazo , M.E

    author Shin, H.S. , author Montachana Chimborazo , M.E. , author Escobar Rivas , J.M. , author Álvaro Lorenzo-Felipe , author Martínez Soler , M. , author Zamorano Serrano , M.J. , author Fernández Martín , J. , author Ramírez Artiles , J.S. , author Peñate Sánchez , A. , auth...

    2023

  22. [30]

    , author Balan, A

    author Sigal, L. , author Balan, A. , author Black, M. , year 2010 . title Humaneva: Synchronized video and motion capture dataset and baseline algorithm for evaluation of articulated human motion . journal International Journal of Computer Vision volume 87 , pages 4--27

    2010

  23. [31]

    , author Russell, C

    author Tome, D. , author Russell, C. , author Agapito, L. , year 2017 . title Lifting from the deep: Convolutional 3d pose estimation from a single image , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pp. pages 1--5

    2017

  24. [32]

    , author Martini, A

    author Tonachella, N. , author Martini, A. , author Martinoli, M. , author Pulcini, D. , author Romano, A. , author Capoccioni, F. , year 2022 . title An affordable and easy-to-use tool for automatic fish length and weight estimation in mariculture . journal Scientific Reports...

    2022

  25. [33]

    , author Golowich, S.E

    author Vapnik, V. , author Golowich, S.E. , author Smola, A. , year 1996 . title Support vector method for function approximation, regression estimation and signal processing , in: booktitle Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Syste...

    1996

  26. [34]

    , author Makris, A

    author Voskakis, D. , author Makris, A. , author Papandroulakis, N. , year 2021 . title Deep learning based fish length estimation. an application for the mediterranean aquaculture , in: booktitle OCEANS 2021: San Diego – Porto , publisher IEEE . pp. pages 1--5

    2021

  27. [35]

    , author Ramakrishna, V

    author Wei, S.E. , author Ramakrishna, V. , author Kanade, T. , author Sheikh, Y. , year 2016 . title Convolutional pose machines , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pp. pages 1--5

    2016

  28. [36]

    , author Zheng, H

    author Wu, J. , author Zheng, H. , author Zhao, B. , author Li, Y. , author Yan, B. , author Liang, R. , author Wang, W. , author Zhou, S. , author Lin, G. , author Fu, Y. , author Wang, Y. , author Wang, Y. , year 2019 . title Large-scale datasets for going deeper in image un...

    2019

  29. [37]

    , author Wu, H

    author Xiao, B. , author Wu, H. , author Wei, Y. , year 2018 . title Simple baselines for human pose estimation and tracking , in: booktitle Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , pp. pages 1--5

    2018

  30. [38]

    , author Zhang, Y

    author Xu, J. , author Zhang, Y. , author Peng, J. , author Ma, W. , author Jesslen, A. , author Ji, P. , author Hu, Q. , author Zhang, J. , author Liu, Q. , author Wang, J. , author Ji, W. , author Wang, C. , author Yuan, X. , author Kaushik, P. , author Zhang, G. , author Li...

    2023

  31. [39]

    , author Zhang, J

    author Xu, Y. , author Zhang, J. , author Zhang, Q. , author Tao, D. , year 2022 . title Vitpose: Simple vision transformer baselines for human pose estimation . arXiv:2204.12484 http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.12484

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    , author Hung, W.C

    author Yao, C.H. , author Hung, W.C. , author Li, Y. , author Rubinstein, M. , author Yang, M.H. , author Jampani, V. , year 2022 . title Lassie: Learning articulated shape from sparse image ensemble via 3d part discovery , in: booktitle NeurIPS , pp. pages 1--5

    2022

  33. [41]

    , author Xiao, B

    author Yu, C. , author Xiao, B. , author Gao, C. , author Yuan, L. , author Zhang, L. , author Sang, N. , author Wang, J. , year 2021 . title Lite-hrnet: A lightweight high-resolution network , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern...

    2021

  34. [42]

    , author Kim, S.H

    author Zhou, H. , author Kim, S.H. , author Kim, S.C. , author Kim, C.W. , author Kang, S.W. , year 2023 . title Size estimation for shrimp using deep learning method . journal Smart Media journal volume 12 , pages 112--119

    2023

  35. [43]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.