Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 126 references

A Multi-Data Approach to Open Clusters: Roslund 3 and Ruprecht 174 in CCD UBV and Gaia DR3 Context

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Two independent methods agree on the ages, distances, and reddening of open clusters Roslund 3 and Ruprecht 174.

desk verdict Two more clusters added to the census with fresh UBV photometry, but the two-method agreement is less independent than claimed. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03070 v1 pith:IFECZS7D submitted 2025-07-03 astro-ph.GA

H. Karagoz , T. Yontan , S. Bilir , O. Plevne , T. Ak , S. Ak , R. Canbay , T. Banks This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords openclustersRoslund3Ruprecht174GaiaDR3UBVphotometryisochronefittingMCMCparameterestimationmasssegregation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies two sparse, under-explored open clusters in the Milky Way's first quadrant, Roslund 3 and Ruprecht 174, using ground-based CCD UBV photometry together with Gaia DR3 astrometry and photometry. It attempts to pin down each cluster's reddening, distance, metallicity, and age by two independent routes: the classical method, which fixes reddening and metallicity from two-color diagrams before fitting isochrones to the color-magnitude diagram, and an MCMC method that estimates all parameters at once from Gaia data. The two routes agree, giving $E(B-V)=0.410\pm0.046$ mag, $d=1687\pm121$ pc, $\tau=60\pm6$ Myr for Roslund 3 and $E(B-V)=0.615\pm0.042$ mag, $d=2385\pm163$ pc, $\tau=520\pm50$ Myr for Ruprecht 174. If the agreement is real, it supports the classical method as a trustworthy tool for clusters where spectroscopy is too sparse to break age-reddening-metallicity degeneracies.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on two parallel parameter-estimation pipelines that share the same PARSEC stellar models and the same Gaia-based membership list. The classical pipeline first fits a zero-age main sequence to the $U-B$ versus $B-V$ two-color diagram using the empirical relation $E(U-B)/E(B-V)=0.72+0.05\,E(B-V)$, then derives photometric metallicities from the UV-excess of a handful of F-G main-sequence stars via the calibration of Karaali et al., and finally fits PARSEC isochrones to the color-magnitude diagrams with reddening and metallicity held fixed. The MCMC pipeline instead assigns one walker per member star and samples a global distance, extinction, age, and metallicity jointly, using a Delaunay-interpolated PARSEC isochrone grid. Agreement between these two otherwise independent routes is the paper's evidence that the derived parameters are reliable.

What would settle it

Take high-resolution spectra of roughly twenty member stars in each cluster, measure [Fe/H] directly, and re-fit the color-magnitude diagrams with the spectroscopic metallicity held fixed; if the resulting ages or distances move by more than the quoted uncertainties, the assumed metallicity and reddening are biased.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that two previously poorly characterized open clusters now have well-defined astrophysical parameters, and that a classical two-step photometric analysis and a simultaneous MCMC analysis return consistent answers. Roslund 3 is a young cluster at about 60 Myr, while Ruprecht 174 is a middle-aged cluster at about 520 Myr, both at roughly 1.7 and 2.4 kpc, respectively, with near-solar metallicities and moderate reddening. The paper further claims that both clusters are dynamically relaxed and mass-segregated, with present-day mass function slopes consistent with the canonical Salpeter value, and that their orbits place them in the thin disk within the Solar circle.

Load-bearing premise

The classical distance and age solution treats reddening and metallicity as known constants, with metallicity coming from only 9 to 10 F-G stars and reddening from an empirical relation, so a bias in either would shift the ages and distances systematically.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Roslund 3 and Ruprecht 174 can now serve as benchmark clusters for studies of young versus middle-aged open cluster evolution, with distances and reddening consistent with Gaia parallax-based estimates.
  • The classical UBV method, which does not require spectroscopy, is shown to yield parameters consistent with a full MCMC fit, supporting its continued use for large samples of poorly studied clusters.
  • Both clusters are claimed to be dynamically relaxed and mass-segregated, meaning their current stellar distributions already reflect internal dynamical evolution rather than only their initial conditions.
  • The near-solar metallicities and thin-disk orbits place both clusters in the local disk population, making them suitable anchors for Galactic metallicity-gradient and orbital studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the classical method is as reliable as this agreement suggests, it could be applied cheaply to many dozens of sparse clusters that lack spectroscopic data, producing a homogeneous parameter catalog.
  • Because the MCMC and classical analyses share the PARSEC models and the same membership list, their agreement does not fully break model-dependent degeneracies; an independent spectroscopic metallicity measurement for more member stars would be a stronger test.
  • The claimed mass segregation rests on 198 and 397 member stars with moderate Kolmogorov-Smirnov confidence levels, so deeper photometry that recovers more low-mass stars could either strengthen or weaken the conclusion.
  • The traceback orbital radii suggest both clusters formed inside the Solar circle; checking whether their birth radii match local spiral-arm structure could link these two clusters to specific star-forming regions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multi-wavelength, multi-method study of two Galactic open clusters, Roslund 3 and Ruprecht 174, using new CCD UBV photometry from the TUG T100 telescope together with Gaia DR3 astrometry and photometry. Membership probabilities are assigned with UPMASK, and cluster parameters are derived by two routes: a 'classical' approach in which reddening and metallicity are fixed from UBV two-color diagrams and then PARSEC isochrones are fitted to the CMD, and an MCMC approach that simultaneously fits distance, G-band extinction, age, and metallicity to Gaia photometry. The paper reports E(B-V)=0.410±0.046 mag, d=1687±121 pc, age 60±6 Myr, and [Fe/H]=0.030±0.065 dex for Roslund 3, and E(B-V)=0.615±0.042 mag, d=2385±163 pc, age 520±50 Myr, and [Fe/H]=0.041±0.064 dex for Ruprecht 174. It also derives radial velocities, Galactic orbits, present-day mass functions, relaxation times, and mass segregation diagnostics, concluding that both clusters are relaxed, mass-segregated, thin-disk members within the Solar circle. The headline claim is that agreement between the classical and MCMC parameter estimates confirms the reliability of both approaches.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a useful homogeneous parameter set for two relatively under-studied open clusters and demonstrates a workable strategy for combining UBV photometry with Gaia DR3. The strengths are the new ground-based UBV dataset, use of UPMASK for membership, explicit comparison of classical and MCMC parameter estimation, and the incorporation of orbital and dynamical analyses. The headline distances and ages are broadly consistent with recent Gaia-based literature values, which gives external plausibility to the measurements. However, the paper's central epistemological claim that the two methods are independent and therefore confirm each other is not justified, because both methods share the same PARSEC isochrone grid and the same membership-filtered sample. The mass-segregation statistics appear to be reported with inverted significance, and the astrometric distances ignore the Gaia parallax zero-point. These issues do not necessarily invalidate the headline parameters, but they need to be fixed before the conclusions can be accepted as stated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; Sections 3.3, 4.3, 4.4.1, and 7] The central robustness claim that agreement between the classical and MCMC methods 'confirms their reliability' is not supported as stated, because both channels share the PARSEC isochrone grid and the same Gaia-based membership list. Section 3.3 pre-filters members using a PARSEC ZAMS, Section 4.3 fits PARSEC isochrones to the UBV CMD, and Section 4.4.1 samples PARSEC CMD 3.8 models in the MCMC; a common systematic in PARSEC colors, bolometric corrections, or the age scale would therefore produce agreement without validating the absolute calibration. The apparent consistency in metallicity is weak: Table 7 gives Z = 0.0159^{+0.0045}_{-0.0165} for Roslund 3 and Z = 0.0166^{+0.0039}_{-0.0208} for Ruprecht 174, so the Z posteriors are nearly unconstrained. I recommend rephrasing the conclusion as a consistency check rather than an independent validation, and adding an explicit discussion of the shared model dependence.
  2. [Section 6.3] The K-S test results are reported in a way that appears to invert their meaning. The text states confidence levels of 71%, 84%, and 75% for Roslund 3 and 70%, 85%, and 74% for Ruprecht 174, and then says the null hypothesis 'can be rejected with moderate statistical confidence' at P<0.05. If these numbers are p-values, values above 0.05 mean the null hypothesis cannot be rejected; if they are confidence levels, the corresponding p-values are not given. In either case, the reported statistics do not support the claim of 'clear signs of mass segregation' at the 95% level, and the cumulative distributions in Figure 15 alone are insufficient. Please report the actual K-S D statistics and p-values and redraw the conclusion accordingly.
  3. [Section 3.3 and Table 9] The astrometric distances d_pi = 1745 ± 12 pc and 2427 ± 18 pc are quoted to high precision from the parallax histograms without any correction for the Gaia DR3 parallax zero-point. The zero-point offset, typically around -0.02 to -0.05 mas for stars in these magnitude and color ranges, is several times larger than the quoted statistical errors and would shift the distances by tens to over a hundred parsecs. Since these distances are presented as an independent check on the isochrone distances in Section 7, item 5, the zero-point should be applied or the comparison should explicitly acknowledge this systematic.
  4. [Sections 4.1-4.3] The classical method is described as determining parameters independently, but the reddening derived in Section 4.1 is reused in Section 4.2 to deredden the F-G stars before computing [Fe/H] and in Section 4.3 to set A_V for the distance modulus. A systematic error in the TCD fit, for example in the adopted solar-abundance ZAMS or in the empirical slope E(U-B)/E(B-V)=0.72+0.05E(B-V), therefore propagates coherently into [Fe/H] and into the distance/age solution. The metallicity calibration also rests on only nine F-G stars for Roslund 3 and ten for Ruprecht 174. I request an explicit propagation of this systematic and a sensitivity test, such as repeating the classical fit with E(B-V) shifted by ±0.05 mag, rather than treating the classical and MCMC results as fully independent.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 1] The abstract contains the typo 'Ruprecht1 74' and Section 1 contains 'nomeclature'; both should be corrected to 'Ruprecht 174' and 'nomenclature'.
  2. [Section 6.3] The text refers to 'Ruprecht 147' when reporting the second cluster's K-S confidence levels; this should be 'Ruprecht 174'.
  3. [Section 4.2] The sentence 'these stars ... identified nine F-G main-sequence stars in total in Roslund 3 and Ruprecht 174' is ambiguous; the text subsequently lists nine stars for Roslund 3 and ten for Ruprecht 174, so the wording should specify the per-cluster counts.
  4. [Section 4.3] The age uncertainties are described as coming from fitting low- and high-age isochrones to the observed scatter; this visual procedure should be stated more explicitly, and the corresponding isochrone curves in Figure 10 should be identified in the figure caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the classical and MCMC parameter estimates are independent fits to distinct data sets, and the distances are externally validated by Gaia parallaxes.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation chain does not reduce any fitted quantity to its own input. Membership probabilities are computed by UPMASK from Gaia astrometry (positions, parallaxes, proper motions), independently of the photometric isochrone fits. In the classical channel, E(B−V) is obtained by fitting the Sung et al. (2013) empirical solar-metallicity ZAMS to the UBV two-color diagram; [Fe/H] then comes from the Karaali et al. (2011) UV-excess calibration applied to dereddened F-G stars; only after these are fixed are PARSEC isochrones used to read distance and age from the CMD. In the MCMC channel, AG, distance, Z, and age are jointly sampled against Gaia (GBP−GRP) photometry with a PARSEC CMD 3.8 grid, with no classical values imposed as priors. The two channels therefore share the PARSEC stellar model family and the UPMASK membership list, but they do not feed each other's fitted parameters; a shared-model systematic would bias both in the same direction, weakening the paper's 'agreement confirms reliability' wording, yet that is a limitation rather than a circular reduction. The distance estimates are also checked against an external, non-fitted benchmark: the Gaia trigonometric parallax distances (1745±12 pc and 2427±18 pc) agree within uncertainties with the isochrone distances (1687±121 pc and 2385±163 pc). No equation in Sections 4.1–4.4.1 defines a target parameter in terms of itself, and no fitted value is relabeled as a prediction. The many citations to the authors' earlier cluster papers are methodological references, and the metallicity calibration, although co-authored by some of the present authors, is an externally published empirical relation not calibrated on these clusters. Thus no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 12 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central parameters are all fitted values: reddening, metallicity, distance, age, and PDMF slope. The paper rests on standard domain assumptions about the reddening law, isochrone fidelity, membership purity, and the Gaia parallax zero point. No new physical entities are introduced; Rteo is a diagnostic quantity from prior work, not an entity.

free parameters (12)
  • E(B-V), Roslund 3 = 0.410 ± 0.046 mag
    Fitted by chi-square shifting the solar-metallicity ZAMS in the U-B vs B-V two-color diagram (Section 4.1).
  • E(B-V), Ruprecht 174 = 0.615 ± 0.042 mag
    Fitted by chi-square shifting the solar-metallicity ZAMS in the U-B vs B-V two-color diagram (Section 4.1).
  • E(U-B), Roslund 3 = 0.304 ± 0.033 mag
    Tied to E(B-V) through the adopted reddening ratio in Section 4.1.
  • E(U-B), Ruprecht 174 = 0.462 ± 0.030 mag
    Tied to E(B-V) through the adopted reddening ratio in Section 4.1.
  • [Fe/H], Roslund 3 = 0.030 ± 0.065 dex
    Mean of normalized UV-excess values from nine F-G stars, converted through the Karaali et al. (2011) calibration (Section 4.2).
  • [Fe/H], Ruprecht 174 = 0.041 ± 0.064 dex
    Mean of normalized UV-excess values from ten F-G stars, converted through the Karaali et al. (2011) calibration (Section 4.2).
  • Distance, Roslund 3 (classical) = 1687 ± 121 pc
    Visual PARSEC isochrone fit to UBV CMDs with fixed E(B-V) and [Fe/H] (Section 4.3).
  • Distance, Ruprecht 174 (classical) = 2385 ± 163 pc
    Visual PARSEC isochrone fit to UBV CMDs with fixed E(B-V) and [Fe/H] (Section 4.3).
  • Age, Roslund 3 = 60 ± 6 Myr
    Best-fit PARSEC isochrone with log tau = 7.78, uncertainty set by low and high age isochrones (Section 4.3).
  • Age, Ruprecht 174 = 520 ± 50 Myr
    Best-fit PARSEC isochrone with log tau = 8.72, uncertainty set by low and high age isochrones (Section 4.3).
  • PDMF slope, Roslund 3 = 1.18 ± 0.13
    Linear fit to log(dN/dM) vs log M from the Gaia luminosity function (Section 6.2).
  • PDMF slope, Ruprecht 174 = 1.53 ± 0.30
    Linear fit to log(dN/dM) vs log M from the Gaia luminosity function (Section 6.2).
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption The empirical reddening ratio E(U-B)/E(B-V) = 0.72 + 0.05 E(B-V) from Garcia et al. (1988) applies to both cluster sightlines.
    Used in Section 4.1 to shift the ZAMS across the two-color diagram; if the extinction law differs, the fitted E(B-V) and hence distance and age shift.
  • domain assumption PARSEC isochrones (Bressan et al. 2012) accurately reproduce the CMDs of these clusters at the fitted Z and age.
    Both the classical isochrone fits (Section 4.3) and the MCMC grid (Section 4.4.1) use PARSEC models, so model errors enter both methods.
  • domain assumption The UPMASK membership cut at P>=0.5 plus visually defined ZAMS boundaries yields a clean and representative member sample.
    Section 3.3 defines the 198 and 397 member samples; contamination or incompleteness in these samples propagates into every photometric parameter.
  • domain assumption A single foreground extinction law with R_V=3.1 and G-band R=1.8626 applies uniformly across each cluster.
    Adopted in Sections 4.3 and 6.1 for distance moduli and absolute magnitudes; differential reddening or a non-standard extinction curve would bias distances and ages.
  • domain assumption The Gaia DR3 parallax zero point is negligible for the mean cluster parallaxes.
    Section 3.3 computes astrometric distances as 1000/ϖ without zero-point correction; a typical negative zero point would shift these distances by tens of parsecs.
  • domain assumption The Karaali et al. (2011) UV-excess calibration converts measured delta_0.6 to [Fe/H] correctly for these F-G stars.
    Section 4.2 applies this calibration to 9 and 10 stars per cluster; an offset in this empirical relation propagates into the adopted Z and the fitted ages.
  • domain assumption MWPotential2014 with R0=8 kpc and Vrot=220 km/s is an adequate model for cluster orbit integration.
    Section 5 uses galpy MWPotential2014 and these constants; different potential models change orbital parameters and the thin-disk conclusion's details.
  • domain assumption Both clusters are single stellar populations with negligible residual field-star and binary contamination after membership selection.
    The isochrone and mass function fits assume a single age and metallicity population; unresolved binaries are mentioned as a possible cause of the two discrepant giants in Ruprecht 174 (Section 4.3).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Multi-Data Approach to Open Clusters: Roslund 3 and Ruprecht 174 in CCD UBV and Gaia DR3 Context." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IFECZS7D

@misc{pith2026250703070,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Multi-Data Approach to Open Clusters: Roslund 3 and Ruprecht 174 in CCD UBV and Gaia DR3 Context},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IFECZS7D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03070}
}
abstract

A detailed analysis of the structural, astrophysical, kinematic, and dynamical properties of the open clusters Roslund 3 and Ruprecht1 74 is carried out using CCD UBV photometry in conjunction with astrometric and photometric data from Gaia DR3. Membership probabilities were computed via the UPMASK algorithm applied to Gaia proper motions and trigonometric parallaxes, leading to the identification of 198 likely members for Roslund 3 and 397 for Ruprecht 174. Astrophysical parameters were derived using both the classical approach, where parameters are independently determined, and a MCMC technique, which estimates them simultaneously. The agreement between the results from both methods confirms their reliability and highlights the robustness of the classical method. The reddening values were determined as $E(B-V)=0.410\pm 0.046$ mag for Roslund 3 and $E(B-V)=0.615\pm 0.042$ mag for Ruprecht 174. The estimated distances are $d=1687 \pm 121$ pc for Roslund 3 and $d=2385 \pm 163$ pc for Ruprecht 174. Both clusters exhibit metallicities close to the solar value, with [Fe/H] = $0.030 \pm 0.065$ dex for Roslund 3 and [Fe/H] = $0.041 \pm 0.064$ dex for Ruprecht 174. The corresponding ages were found to be $\tau=60\pm 6$ and $\tau=520\pm 50$ Myr, respectively. The present day mass function slopes were found to be $1.18 \pm 0.13$ for Roslund 3 and $1.53 \pm 0.30$ for Ruprecht 174, consistent with the canonical Salpeter value within uncertainties. Galactic orbital analyses indicate that both clusters are thin-disk members confined within the Solar circle. Additionally, relaxation times and spatial distributions of stars suggest that both clusters have reached dynamical relaxation and exhibit clear signs of mass segregation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.03070 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Star fields for Roslund 3 (left panel) and Ruprecht 174 (right panel) in the equatorial coordinate system. The red boundaries indicate the fields observed with the T100 telescope, that is, 21′ .5 × 21′ .5. Each chart is 40′ × 40′ . North and east correspond to the up and left directions, respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. King profiles of Roslund 3 (upper panel) and Ruprecht 174 (lower panel), with black solid curves repre￾senting the best-fit models. The shaded red and gray re￾gions indicate the confidence intervals of the model and the background stellar density, respectively, while the red arrows show the limiting radii of the OCs. The concentration parameter, defined as C = log(rlim/rc), is a key indicator of the internal structu… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: displays the distribution of stars in both the UBV and Gaia-based CMDs. The ZAMS of H. Sung et al. (2013) and PARSEC restricted bands are over￾plotted as solid and dashed blue curves, respectively. The B vs (B − V ) CMDs for stars identified from UBV data are presented…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The membership probability distributions for all stars in the cluster fields of Roslund 3 (a) and Ruprecht 174 (b) are shown, based on Gaia data. The blue histograms represent the membership probabilities of all stars detected in the cluster regions. the dashed blue li…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The fields of Roslund 3 (upper panels) and Ruprecht 174 (lower panels) OCs: Gaia DR3 proper-motion components (left panels) and sky orientation vectors in equatorial coordinates (right panels). The color scale and circles are consistent with those in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Trigonometric parallax histograms of stars with membership probabilities P ≥ 0.5, within the G ≤ 20.5 mag limit, and relative parallax errors σϖ/ϖ < 0.2 for the Roslund 3 (a) and Ruprecht 174 (b). The red dashed lines represent the Gaussian curve fitted to the distribu…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (U − B)0 vs (B − V )0 TCDs for nine F–G type main-sequence stars with membership probabilities P ≥ 0.5 are presented for Roslund 3 (top panel a) and Ruprecht 174 (top panel b). The Hyades main sequence, shown as blue curves, is used as a reference. The bottom panels di…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: CMDs based on UBV and Gaia photometry for the clusters Roslund 3 (panels a, b, c) and Ruprecht 174 (panels d, e, f). The blue solid lines represent the parsec isochrones that best match the observed data, allowing for the determination of the clusters’ distance moduli…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The corner plot presents both the one￾dimensional marginalized and two-dimensional joint poste￾rior probability distributions for the inferred parameters of Roslund 3 and Ruprecht 174. In the two-dimensional panels, the overlaid contours correspond to confidence level…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The orbital motions of the Roslund 3 (a, b) and Ruprecht 174 (c, d) in the (Z vs Rgc) and (Rgc vs t) planes. The filled yellow circles and triangles represent the present-day and early orbital positions of the clusters in the Galaxy, respectively. Red arrows indicate …
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: LF histograms for Roslund 3 (a) and Ruprecht 174 (b). estimated using Poisson statistics. The PDMFs of the clusters were derived by applying the linear relationship log dN dM  = −(1 + Γ) × log M + constant; where dN is the number of stars per unit mass interval, M is…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: PDMFs for Roslund 3 (a) and Ruprecht 174 (b). The red points represent the mass distributions, while the blue line shows the best-fit linear trend. Green lines mark the one standard deviation boundaries of the fit. locity distribution. The relaxation time depends on t…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The cumulative radial distribution of stars across various mass ranges for Roslund 3 (a) and Ruprecht 174 (b). trast, stars with intermediate and low masses exhibit rel￾atively similar spatial distributions, predominantly oc￾cupying regions at larger radial distances …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

126 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    adobe:ns:meta/

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    2019

  4. [4]

    F., Yontan , T., et al

    Ak , T., Bostanc , Z. F., Yontan , T., et al. 2016, title CCD <inline-formula id=``IEq1''><mml:math><mml:mi mathvariant=``italic''>UBV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> photometry of the open cluster NGC 6819 , , 361, 126, 10.1007/s10509-016-2707-2

    doi:10.1007/s10509-016-2707-2 2016

  5. [5]

    Ak , T., Canbay , R., & Yontan , T. 2024, title Transformation Relations for UBV Photometric System of 1m Telescope at the T \"U B \.I TAK National Observatory , Physics and Astronomy Reports, 2, 58, 10.26650/PAR.2024.00006

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    2024, title Radial Metallicity Gradients for the Chemically Selected Galactic Thin Disc Main-Sequence Stars , Astronomische Nachrichten, 345, e20240052, 10.1002/asna.20240052

    Akbaba , F., Ak , T., Bilir , S., et al. 2024, title Radial Metallicity Gradients for the Chemically Selected Galactic Thin Disc Main-Sequence Stars , Astronomische Nachrichten, 345, e20240052, 10.1002/asna.20240052

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.20240052 2024

  7. [7]

    2021, title A study of the C zernik 2 and NGC 7654 open clusters using CCD UBV photometric and G aia EDR3 data, Astrophysics and Space Science, 366, 68, 10.1007/s10509-021-03975-x

    Akbulut, B., Ak, S., Yontan, T., et al. 2021, title A study of the C zernik 2 and NGC 7654 open clusters using CCD UBV photometric and G aia EDR3 data, Astrophysics and Space Science, 366, 68, 10.1007/s10509-021-03975-x

    doi:10.1007/s10509-021-03975-x 2021

  8. [8]

    J., Goodwin , S

    Allison , R. J., Goodwin , S. P., Parker , R. J., et al. 2009, title Dynamical Mass Segregation on a Very Short Timescale , , 700, L99, 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/L99

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/l99 2009

Show all 126 references
  1. [9]

    Almeida , A., Monteiro , H., & Dias , W. S. 2023, title Revisiting the mass of open clusters with Gaia data , , 525, 2315, 10.1093/mnras/stad2291

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    S., Corradi , W

    Angelo , M. S., Corradi , W. J. B., Santos , Jr., J. F. C., Maia , F. F. S., & Ferreira , F. A. 2021, title Characterizing dynamical states of Galactic open clusters with Gaia DR2 , , 500, 4338, 10.1093/mnras/staa3192

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    A., Tadross , A

    Badawy , W. A., Tadross , A. L., Hendy , Y. H. M., Ismail , M. N., & Mouner , A. 2024, title Gaia (DR3)-based astronomical analysis of the seven unstudied open star clusters , , 109, 102196, 10.1016/j.newast.2024.102196

    2024

  4. [12]

    2020, title Vilnius photometry and Gaia astrometry of Melotte 105 , Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 41, 6, 10.1007/s12036-020-9621-2

    Banks , T., Yontan , T., Bilir , S., & Canbay , R. 2020, title Vilnius photometry and Gaia astrometry of Melotte 105 , Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 41, 6, 10.1007/s12036-020-9621-2

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    2018, title Multiple Stellar Populations in Globular Clusters , , 56, 83, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051839

    Bastian , N., & Lardo , C. 2018, title Multiple Stellar Populations in Globular Clusters , , 56, 83, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051839

    2018 doi

  6. [15]

    1996, title SExtractor: Software for source extraction

    Bertin , E., & Arnouts , S. 1996, title SExtractor: Software for source extraction. , , 117, 393, 10.1051/aas:1996164

    1996 doi

  7. [16]

    2006, title Separation of dwarf and giant stars with ROTSE-III d, Astronomische Nachrichten, 327, 693, 10.1002/asna.200510614

    Bilir , S., G \"u ver , T., & Aslan , M. 2006, title Separation of dwarf and giant stars with ROTSE-III d, Astronomische Nachrichten, 327, 693, 10.1002/asna.200510614

    2006 doi

  8. [17]

    2010, title CCD BV and 2MASS photometric study of the open cluster NGC 1513 , , 326, 139, 10.1007/s10509-009-0233-1

    Bilir , S., G \"u ver , T., Khamitov , I., et al. 2010, title CCD BV and 2MASS photometric study of the open cluster NGC 1513 , , 326, 139, 10.1007/s10509-009-0233-1

    2010 doi

  9. [18]

    F., Yontan , T., et al

    Bilir , S., Bostanc , Z. F., Yontan , T., et al. 2016, title CCD UBV photometry and kinematics of the open cluster NGC 225 , Advances in Space Research, 58, 1900, 10.1016/j.asr.2016.06.039

    2016 doi

  10. [19]

    Bisht , D., Zhu , Q., Yadav , R. K. S., Durgapal , A., & Rangwal , G. 2020, title A comprehensive study of open clusters Czernik 14, Haffner 14, Haffner 17 and King 10 using multicolour photometry and Gaia DR2 astrometry , , 494, 607, 10.1093/mnras/staa656

    2020 doi

  11. [21]

    2019, title Age determination for 269 Gaia DR2 open clusters , Astronomy and Astrophysics, 623, A108, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834693

    Bossini , D., Vallenari , A., Bragaglia , A., et al. 2019, title Age determination for 269 Gaia DR2 open clusters , Astronomy and Astrophysics, 623, A108, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834693

    2019 doi

  12. [22]

    F., Ak , T., Yontan , T., et al

    Bostanc , Z. F., Ak , T., Yontan , T., et al. 2015, title A comprehensive study of the open cluster NGC 6866 , , 453, 1095, 10.1093/mnras/stv1665

    2015 doi

  13. [23]

    F., Yontan , T., Bilir , S., et al

    Bostanc , Z. F., Yontan , T., Bilir , S., et al. 2018, title CCD UBV photometric study of five open clusters Dolidze 36, NGC 6728, NGC 6800, NGC 7209, and Platais 1 , , 363, 143, 10.1007/s10509-018-3364-4

    2018 doi

  14. [24]

    2015, title galpy: A p ython Library for G alactic Dynamics, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 216, 29, 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29

    Bovy, J. 2015, title galpy: A p ython Library for G alactic Dynamics, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 216, 29, 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29

    2015 doi

  15. [25]

    2012, title On the Local Dark Matter Density, The Astrophysical Journal, 756, 89, 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/89

    Bovy, J., & Tremaine, S. 2012, title On the Local Dark Matter Density, The Astrophysical Journal, 756, 89, 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/89

    2012 doi

  16. [26]

    Bressan, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al. 2012, title PARSEC : stellar tracks and isochrones with the PA dova and TR ieste S tellar E volution C ode, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 427, 127, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x

    2012

  17. [27]

    2020, title Clusters and mirages: cataloguing stellar aggregates in the Milky Way , , 633, A99, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936691

    Cantat-Gaudin , T., & Anders , F. 2020, title Clusters and mirages: cataloguing stellar aggregates in the Milky Way , , 633, A99, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936691

    2020 doi

  18. [28]

    2018, title A G aia DR2 view of the open cluster population in the M ilky W ay , Astronomy and Astrophysics, 618, A93, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833476

    Cantat-Gaudin, T., Jordi, C., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018, title A G aia DR2 view of the open cluster population in the M ilky W ay , Astronomy and Astrophysics, 618, A93, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833476

    2018 doi

  19. [29]

    2020, title Painting a portrait of the Galactic disc with its stellar clusters, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 640, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038192

    Cantat-Gaudin, T., Anders, F., Castro-Ginard, A., et al. 2020, title Painting a portrait of the Galactic disc with its stellar clusters, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 640, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038192

    2020 doi

  20. [30]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, title The Relationship between Infrared, Optical, and Ultraviolet Extinction , , 345, 245, 10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  21. [31]

    V., Moni Bidin , C., & Vazquez , R

    Carraro , G., Sales Silva , J. V., Moni Bidin , C., & Vazquez , R. A. 2017, title Galactic Structure in the Outer Disk: The Field in the Line of Sight to the Intermediate-age Open Cluster Tombaugh 1 , The Astronomical Journal, 153, 99, 10.3847/1538-3881/153/3/99

    2017 doi

  22. [32]

    J., Luri , X., et al

    Castro-Ginard , A., McMillan , P. J., Luri , X., et al. 2021, title Milky Way spiral arms from open clusters in Gaia EDR3 , , 652, A162, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039751

    2021 doi

  23. [33]

    2024, title Photometric and Kinematic Studies of Open Clusters Ruprecht 1 and Ruprecht 171 , Astronomische Nachrichten, 345, e20240054, 10.1002/asna.20240054

    C akmak , H., Yontan , T., Bilir , S., et al. 2024, title Photometric and Kinematic Studies of Open Clusters Ruprecht 1 and Ruprecht 171 , Astronomische Nachrichten, 345, e20240054, 10.1002/asna.20240054

    2024 doi

  24. [34]

    C., Bilir , S., S ahin , T., & Plevne , O

    C nar , D. C., Bilir , S., S ahin , T., & Plevne , O. 2025, title Tracing the Galactic Origins of Selected Four G-type Stars in the Solar Neighborhood , , 170, 13, 10.3847/1538-3881/add343

    2025 doi

  25. [35]

    C., Ta s demir , S., Ko c , S., & Iyer , S

    C nar , D. C., Ta s demir , S., Ko c , S., & Iyer , S. 2024, title SED Analysis of the Old Open Cluster NGC 188 , Physics and Astronomy Reports, 2, 1, 10.26650/PAR.2024.00002

    2024

  26. [36]

    Q., Nissen , P

    Chen , Y. Q., Nissen , P. E., Zhao , G., Zhang , H. W., & Benoni , T. 2000, title Chemical composition of 90 F and G disk dwarfs , , 141, 491, 10.1051/aas:2000124

    2000 doi

  27. [38]

    S., Assafin , M., Fl \'o rio , V., Alessi , B

    Dias , W. S., Assafin , M., Fl \'o rio , V., Alessi , B. S., & L \' bero , V. 2006, title Proper motion determination of open clusters based on the UCAC2 catalogue , , 446, 949, 10.1051/0004-6361:20052741

    2006 doi

  28. [39]

    S., Monteir, H., Moitinho, A., et al

    Dias, W. S., Monteir, H., Moitinho, A., et al. 2021, title Updated parameters of 1743 open clusters based on G aia DR2 , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 504, 356, 10.1093/mnras/stab770

    2021 doi

  29. [40]

    S., Monteiro , H., & Assafin , M

    Dias , W. S., Monteiro , H., & Assafin , M. 2018, title Update of membership and mean proper motion of open clusters from UCAC5 catalogue , , 478, 5184, 10.1093/mnras/sty1456

    2018 doi

  30. [41]

    S., Monteiro, H., Caetano, T

    Dias, W. S., Monteiro, H., Caetano, T. C., et al. 2014, title Proper motions of the optically visible open clusters based on the UCAC4 catalog, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 564, A79, 10.1051/0004-6361/201323226

    2014 doi

  31. [42]

    Dib , S., & Henning , T. 2019, title Star formation activity and the spatial distribution and mass segregation of dense cores in the early phases of star formation , , 629, A135, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834080

    2019 doi

  32. [43]

    2025, title Fundamentals of Stars II: Revisiting Bolometric Corrections , Physics and Astronomy Reports, 3, 43, :10.26650/PAR.2025.00005

    Eker , Z., & Bak s , V. 2025, title Fundamentals of Stars II: Revisiting Bolometric Corrections , Physics and Astronomy Reports, 3, 43, :10.26650/PAR.2025.00005

    2025

  33. [44]

    2024, title Fundamentals of Stars: A Critical Look at Mass-Luminosity Relations and Beyond , Physics and Astronomy Reports, 2, 41, 10.26650/PAR.2024.00001

    Eker , Z., Soydugan , F., & Bilir , S. 2024, title Fundamentals of Stars: A Critical Look at Mass-Luminosity Relations and Beyond , Physics and Astronomy Reports, 2, 41, 10.26650/PAR.2024.00001

    2024

  34. [45]

    Eker, Z., Soydugan, F., Bilir, S., et al. 2020, title Empirical bolometric correction coefficients for nearby main-sequence stars in the G aia era, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 496, 3887, 10.1093/mnras/staa1659

    2020 doi

  35. [46]

    Eker, Z., Bak s , V., Bilir, S., et al. 2018, title Interrelated main-sequence mass-luminosity, mass-radius, and mass-effective temperature relations, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 479, 5491, 10.1093/mnras/sty1834

    2018 doi

  36. [47]

    1987, title Dynamical evolution of globular clusters

    Elson , R., Hut , P., & Inagaki , S. 1987, title Dynamical evolution of globular clusters. , , 25, 565, 10.1146/annurev.aa.25.090187.003025

    1987

  37. [48]

    1998, title Mass Segregation in Young Large Magellanic Cloud Clusters

    Fischer , P., Pryor , C., Murray , S., Mateo , M., & Richtler , T. 1998, title Mass Segregation in Young Large Magellanic Cloud Clusters. I. NGC 2157 , , 115, 592, 10.1086/300212

    1998 doi

  38. [49]

    W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, title emcee: The MCMC Hammer , , 125, 306, 10.1086/670067

    2013 doi

  39. [50]

    Gaia Collaboration , Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., et al. 2016, title The Gaia mission , , 595, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272

    2016 doi

  40. [51]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, title Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties , , 674, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    2023 doi

  41. [52]

    J., & Levato , H

    Garcia , B., Claria , J. J., & Levato , H. 1988, title The Ratio of Total to Selective Absorption in the CARINA-OB2 Association , , 143, 317, 10.1007/BF00637143

    1988 doi

  42. [53]

    2011, in Stellar Clusters & Associations: A RIA Workshop on Gaia, 118--122, 10.48550/arXiv.1106.4780

    Gieles , M. 2011, in Stellar Clusters & Associations: A RIA Workshop on Gaia, 118--122, 10.48550/arXiv.1106.4780

    2011 doi arXiv

  43. [54]

    2023, title CCD UBV and Gaia DR3 Analyses of the Open Clusters King 6 and NGC 1605 , , 166, 263, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad08b0

    Gokmen , S., Eker , Z., Yontan , T., et al. 2023, title CCD UBV and Gaia DR3 Analyses of the Open Clusters King 6 and NGC 1605 , , 166, 263, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad08b0

    2023 doi

  44. [55]

    J., Xu , Y., Hou , L

    Hao , C. J., Xu , Y., Hou , L. G., et al. 2021, title Evolution of the local spiral structure of the Milky Way revealed by open clusters , , 652, A102, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140608

    2021 doi

  45. [56]

    A., Elsanhoury , W

    Haroon , A. A., Elsanhoury , W. H., Elkholy , E. A., Saad , A. S., & C nar , D. C. 2025, title Study of open star clusters using the gaia DR3: I-poorly studied king 2 and king 5 , , 100, 055006, 10.1088/1402-4896/adbf71

    2025 doi

  46. [57]

    Heggie, D. C. 1979, title A theory of core collapse in clusters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 188, 525, 10.1093/mnras/188.3.525

    1979 doi

  47. [58]

    I., Aprilia , & Hakim , M

    Hidayat , W., Arifyanto , M. I., Aprilia , & Hakim , M. I. 2019, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 1231, Journal of Physics Conference Series (IOP), 012032, 10.1088/1742-6596/1231/1/012032

    2019 doi

  48. [59]

    A., & Hartmann , L

    Hillenbrand , L. A., & Hartmann , L. W. 1998, title A Preliminary Study of the Orion Nebula Cluster Structure and Dynamics , , 492, 540, 10.1086/305076

    1998 doi

  49. [60]

    V., et al

    H g , E., Fabricius , C., Makarov , V. V., et al. 2000, title The Tycho-2 catalogue of the 2.5 million brightest stars , , 355, L27

    2000

  50. [61]

    L., & Reffert , S

    Hunt , E. L., & Reffert , S. 2023, title Improving the open cluster census. II. An all-sky cluster catalogue with Gaia DR3 , , 673, A114, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346285

    2023 doi

  51. [62]

    A., & Hoq , S

    Janes , K. A., & Hoq , S. 2011, title A Quantitative Analysis of Distant Open Clusters , , 141, 92, 10.1088/0004-6256/141/3/92

    2011 doi

  52. [63]

    C., Deepak , & Malhotra , S

    Joshi , Y. C., Deepak , & Malhotra , S. 2024, title A study on the metallicity gradients in the galactic disk using open clusters , Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 11, 1348321, 10.3389/fspas.2024.1348321

    2024

  53. [64]

    G., Bilir, S., Karata s , Y., & Gilmore, G

    Karaali, S., Ak, S. G., Bilir, S., Karata s , Y., & Gilmore, G. 2003 a , title A charge-coupled device study of high-latitude G alactic structure: testing the model parameters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 343, 1013, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06743.x

    2003

  54. [65]

    2011, title An Improved Metallicity Calibration with UBV Photometry, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 28, 95, 10.1071/AS10026

    Karaali, S., Bilir, S., Ak, S., Yaz, E., & Co s kuno g lu, B. 2011, title An Improved Metallicity Calibration with UBV Photometry, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 28, 95, 10.1071/AS10026

    2011 doi

  55. [66]

    Karaali, S., Bilir, S., Karata s , Y., & Ak, S. G. 2003 b , title New Metallicity Calibration Down to [Fe/H] = -2.75 dex, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 20, 165, 10.1071/AS02028

    2003 doi

  56. [67]

    V., Piskunov, A

    Kharchenko, N. V., Piskunov, A. E., R \"o ser, S., Schilbach, E., & Scholz, R. D. 2005, title Astrophysical parameters of G alactic open clusters, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 438, 1163, 10.1051/0004-6361:20042523

    2005 doi

  57. [68]

    V., Piskunov , A

    Kharchenko , N. V., Piskunov , A. E., R \"o ser , S., et al. 2009, title Integrated BVJHK\ s\ parameters and luminosity functions of 650 Galactic open clusters , , 504, 681, 10.1051/0004-6361/200911979

    2009 doi

  58. [69]

    V., Piskunov, A

    Kharchenko, N. V., Piskunov, A. E., Schilbach, E., R \"o ser, S., & Scholz, R. D. 2013, title Global survey of star clusters in the M ilky W ay. II. The catalogue of basic parameters, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 558, A53, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322302

    2013 doi

  59. [70]

    1962, title The structure of star clusters

    King, I. 1962, title The structure of star clusters. I. an empirical density law, Astronomical Journal, 67, 471, 10.1086/108756

    1962 doi

  60. [71]

    2022, title A Photometric and Astrometric Study of the Open Clusters NGC 1664 and NGC 6939 , The Astronomical Journal, 163, 191, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac58a0

    Ko c , S., Yontan , T., Bilir , S., et al. 2022, title A Photometric and Astrometric Study of the Open Clusters NGC 1664 and NGC 6939 , The Astronomical Journal, 163, 191, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac58a0

    2022 doi

  61. [72]

    2014, title UPMASK : unsupervised photometric membership assignment in stellar clusters, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 561, A57, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321143

    Krone-Martins, A., & Moitinho, A. 2014, title UPMASK : unsupervised photometric membership assignment in stellar clusters, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 561, A57, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321143

    2014 doi

  62. [73]

    Kruijssen , J. M. D., Maschberger , T., Moeckel , N., et al. 2012, title The dynamical state of stellar structure in star-forming regions , , 419, 841, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19748.x

    2012

  63. [74]

    J., & Lada , E

    Lada , C. J., & Lada , E. A. 2003, title Embedded Clusters in Molecular Clouds , , 41, 57, 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094844

    2003 arXiv

  64. [75]

    Landolt, A. U. 2009, title UBVRI Photometric Standard Stars Around the Celestial Equator: Updates and Additions, The Astronomical Journal, 137, 4186, 10.1088/0004-6256/137/5/4186

    2009 doi

  65. [76]

    W., Mierle , K., Blanton , M., & Roweis , S

    Lang , D., Hogg , D. W., Mierle , K., Blanton , M., & Roweis , S. 2010, title Astrometry.net: Blind Astrometric Calibration of Arbitrary Astronomical Images , , 139, 1782, 10.1088/0004-6256/139/5/1782

    2010 doi

  66. [77]

    2019, title A Catalog of Newly Identified Star Clusters in G aia DR 2 , The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 245, 32, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab530a

    Liu, L., & Pang, X. 2019, title A Catalog of Newly Identified Star Clusters in G aia DR 2 , The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 245, 32, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab530a

    2019 doi

  67. [78]

    V., & Beshenov , G

    Loktin , A. V., & Beshenov , G. V. 2003, title Proper Motions of Open Star Clusters and the Rotation Rate of the Galaxy , Astronomy Reports, 47, 6, 10.1134/1.1538491

    2003 doi

  68. [79]

    V., & Popova, M

    Loktin, A. V., & Popova, M. E. 2017, title Updated version of the `homogeneous catalog of open cluster parameters, Astrophysical Bulletin, 72, 257, 10.1134/S1990341317030154

    2017 doi

  69. [80]

    Majewski , S. R. 1993, title Galactic structure surveys and the evolution of the Milky Way. , , 31, 575, 10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.003043

    1993

  70. [81]

    Maurya , J., & Joshi , Y. C. 2020, title Photometric and kinematic study of the three intermediate age open clusters NGC 381, NGC 2360, and Berkeley 68 , , 494, 4713, 10.1093/mnras/staa893

    2020 doi

  71. [82]

    F., & Ostriker , E

    McKee , C. F., & Ostriker , E. C. 2007, title Theory of Star Formation , , 45, 565, 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602

    2007 arXiv

  72. [83]

    O'Donnell , J. E. 1994, title R v-dependent Optical and Near-Ultraviolet Extinction , , 422, 158, 10.1086/173713

    1994 doi

  73. [84]

    2022, title Mass segregation and dynamics of primordial binaries in star clusters with a radially anisotropic velocity distribution , , 515, 1830, 10.1093/mnras/stac1776

    Pavl \' k , V., & Vesperini , E. 2022, title Mass segregation and dynamics of primordial binaries in star clusters with a radially anisotropic velocity distribution , , 515, 1830, 10.1093/mnras/stac1776

    2022 doi

  74. [85]

    E., Kharchenko , N

    Piskunov , A. E., Kharchenko , N. V., R \"o ser , S., Schilbach , E., & Scholz , R. D. 2006, title Revisiting the population of Galactic open clusters , , 445, 545, 10.1051/0004-6361:20053764

    2006 doi

  75. [86]

    2015, title Local Stellar Kinematics from RAVE Data - VI

    Plevne , O., Ak , T., Karaali , S., et al. 2015, title Local Stellar Kinematics from RAVE Data - VI. Metallicity Gradients Based on the F-G Main-Sequence Stars , , 32, e043, 10.1017/pasa.2015.44

    2015 doi

  76. [87]

    F., McMillan , S

    Portegies Zwart , S. F., McMillan , S. L. W., & Gieles , M. 2010, title Young Massive Star Clusters , , 48, 431, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130834

    2010 doi

  77. [88]

    Raboud , D., & Mermilliod , J. C. 1998, title Evolution of mass segregation in open clusters: some observational evidences , , 333, 897, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9802284

    1998 doi arXiv

  78. [89]

    P., & Liu , X

    Rangwal , G., Arya , A., Subramaniam , A., Singh , K. P., & Liu , X. 2024, title Orbits and vertical height distribution of 4006 open clusters in the Galactic disk using Gaia DR3 , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.15305, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.15305

    2024 doi arXiv

  79. [90]

    O., & Tremaine , S

    Richstone , D. O., & Tremaine , S. 1986, title Measuring mass-to-light ratios of spherical stellar systems by core fitting. , , 92, 72, 10.1086/114135

    1986 doi

  80. [91]

    2010, title The PPMXL Catalog of Positions and Proper Motions on the ICRS

    Roeser , S., Demleitner , M., & Schilbach , E. 2010, title The PPMXL Catalog of Positions and Proper Motions on the ICRS. Combining USNO-B1.0 and the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) , , 139, 2440, 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2440

    2010 doi

  81. [92]

    1960, title REMARKS ON SOME NEW AND SOME KNOWN GALACTIC CLUSTERS, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 72, 205, 10.1086/127512

    Roslund, C. 1960, title REMARKS ON SOME NEW AND SOME KNOWN GALACTIC CLUSTERS, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 72, 205, 10.1086/127512

    1960 doi

  82. [93]

    1966, title Classification of open star clusters , Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia, 17, 33

    Ruprecht , J. 1966, title Classification of open star clusters , Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia, 17, 33

    1966

  83. [94]

    I., Piskunov , A

    Sagar , R., Miakutin , V. I., Piskunov , A. E., & Dluzhnevskaia , O. B. 1988, title A study of the spatial stellar mass distribution in some young open clusters. , , 234, 831, 10.1093/mnras/234.4.831

    1988 doi

  84. [95]

    Salpeter , E. E. 1955, title The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution. , , 121, 161, 10.1086/145971

    1955 doi

  85. [96]

    1969, title New subdwarfs

    Sandage, A. 1969, title New subdwarfs. II. Radial velocities, photometry, and preliminary space motions for 112 stars with large proper motion, Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 158, p. 1115, 158, 1115

    1969

  86. [97]

    J., Moreno , E., Nissen , P

    Schuster , W. J., Moreno , E., Nissen , P. E., & Pichardo , B. 2012, title Two distinct halo populations in the solar neighborhood. III. Evidence from stellar ages and orbital parameters , , 538, A21, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118035

    2012 doi

  87. [98]

    2012, title PyRAF: Python alternative for IRAF , , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1207.011

    Science Software Branch at STScI . 2012, title PyRAF: Python alternative for IRAF , , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1207.011

    2012

  88. [99]

    F., Cutri , R

    Skrutskie , M. F., Cutri , R. M., Stiening , R., et al. 2006, title The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) , , 131, 1163, 10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  89. [100]

    2018, title Open cluster kinematics with G aia DR 2, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 619, A155, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834020

    Soubiran, C., Cantat-Gaudin, T., Romero-G \'o mez, M., et al. 2018, title Open cluster kinematics with G aia DR 2, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 619, A155, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834020

    2018 doi

  90. [101]

    2022, title Mapping the Galactic Metallicity Gradient with Open Clusters: The State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges , Universe, 8, 87, 10.3390/universe8020087

    Spina , L., Magrini , L., & Cunha , K. 2022, title Mapping the Galactic Metallicity Gradient with Open Clusters: The State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges , Universe, 8, 87, 10.3390/universe8020087

    2022 doi

  91. [102]

    Spitzer , Jr., L., & Hart , M. H. 1971, title Random Gravitational Encounters and the Evolution of Spherical Systems. I. Method , , 164, 399, 10.1086/150855

    1971 doi

  92. [103]

    Stetson , P. B. 1987, title DAOPHOT: A Computer Program for Crowded-Field Stellar Photometry , , 99, 191, 10.1086/131977

    1987 doi

  93. [104]

    S., et al

    Sung, H., Lim, B., Bessell, M. S., et al. 2013, title Sejong Open Cluster Survey ( SOS ). 0. Target Selection and Data Analysis, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 46, 103, 10.5303/JKAS.2013.46.3.103

    2013 doi

  94. [105]

    Ta s demir , S., & C nar , D. C. 2025, title A detailed analysis of close binary OCs , Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, 55, 506, 10.31577/caosp.2025.55.3.506

    2025 doi

  95. [106]

    C., Canbay , R., et al

    Ta s demir , S., C nar , D. C., Canbay , R., et al. 2025, title Comprehensive Analysis of Middle-Aged Open Cluster NGC 6793 in Vulpecula via Gaia DR3 Data , Physics and Astronomy Reports, 3, 1, 10.26650/PAR.2025.00003

    2025

  96. [107]

    2023, title Analysis of the Young Open Cluster Trumpler 2 Using Gaia DR3 Data , Physics and Astronomy Reports, 1, 1, 10.26650/PAR.2023.00001

    Ta s demir , S., & Yontan , T. 2023, title Analysis of the Young Open Cluster Trumpler 2 Using Gaia DR3 Data , Physics and Astronomy Reports, 1, 1, 10.26650/PAR.2023.00001

    2023

  97. [108]

    L., & Hendy , Y

    Tadross , A. L., & Hendy , Y. H. 2021, title Characteristics of the open star cluster Kronberger 60 using Gaia DR2 , Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 42, 6, 10.1007/s12036-020-09648-5

    2021 doi

  98. [109]

    2021, title 3 D kinematics and age distribution of the open cluster population, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 647, A19, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039388

    Tarricq, Y., C., S., Casamiquela, L., et al. 2021, title 3 D kinematics and age distribution of the open cluster population, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 647, A19, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039388

    2021 doi

  99. [110]

    1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Tody , D. 1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 627, Instrumentation in astronomy VI, ed. D. L. Crawford , 733, 10.1117/12.968154

    1986 doi

  100. [111]

    1993, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Tody , D. 1993, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 52, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II, ed. R. J. Hanisch , R. J. V. Brissenden , & J. Barnes , 173

    1993

  101. [112]

    Trumpler , R. J. 1930, title Preliminary results on the distances, dimensions and space distribution of open star clusters , Lick Observatory Bulletin, 420, 154, 10.5479/ADS/bib/1930LicOB.14.154T

    1930 doi

  102. [113]

    2019, title Vertical and radial metallicity gradients in high latitude galactic fields with SDSS , Advances in Space Research, 63, 1360, 10.1016/j.asr.2018.10.041

    Tun c el G \"u c tekin , S., Bilir , S., Karaali , S., Plevne , O., & Ak , S. 2019, title Vertical and radial metallicity gradients in high latitude galactic fields with SDSS , Advances in Space Research, 63, 1360, 10.1016/j.asr.2018.10.041

    2019 doi

  103. [114]

    Turner , D. G. 1993, title A detailed study of the sparse open cluster Roslund 3: a case for circumstellar extinction. , , 97, 755

    1993

  104. [115]

    P., Ferreras , I., Mignani , R

    Vande Putte , D., Garnier , T. P., Ferreras , I., Mignani , R. P., & Cropper , M. 2010, title A kinematic study of open clusters: implications for their origin , , 407, 2109, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17025.x

    2010

  105. [116]

    A., Moitinho , A., Carraro , G., & Dias , W

    V \'a zquez , R. A., Moitinho , A., Carraro , G., & Dias , W. S. 2010, title Open clusters in the Third Galactic Quadrant III. Alleged binary clusters , , 511, A38, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811583

    2010 doi

  106. [117]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, title SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  107. [118]

    2009, title The orbits of open clusters in the Galaxy , , 399, 2146, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15416.x

    Wu , Z.-Y., Zhou , X., Ma , J., & Du , C.-H. 2009, title The orbits of open clusters in the Galaxy , , 399, 2146, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15416.x

    2009

  108. [119]

    2023a, title An Investigation of Open Clusters Berkeley 68 and Stock 20 Using CCD UBV and Gaia DR3 Data , , 165, 79, 10.3847/1538-3881/aca6f0

    Yontan , T. 2023a, title An Investigation of Open Clusters Berkeley 68 and Stock 20 Using CCD UBV and Gaia DR3 Data , , 165, 79, 10.3847/1538-3881/aca6f0

    doi

  109. [120]

    2023b, title CCD UBV and Gaia DR3 based analysis of NGC 189, NGC 1758 and NGC 7762 open clusters , Advances in Space Research, 72, 1454, 10.1016/j.asr.2023.04.015

    Yontan , T., Bilir , S., C akmak , H., et al. 2023b, title CCD UBV and Gaia DR3 based analysis of NGC 189, NGC 1758 and NGC 7762 open clusters , Advances in Space Research, 72, 1454, 10.1016/j.asr.2023.04.015

    2023 doi

  110. [121]

    2023c, title Comprehensive Analysis of the Open Cluster Collinder 74 , Physics and Astronomy Reports, 1, 65, 10.26650/PAR.2023.00008

    Yontan , T., & Canbay , R. 2023c, title Comprehensive Analysis of the Open Cluster Collinder 74 , Physics and Astronomy Reports, 1, 65, 10.26650/PAR.2023.00008

    2023

  111. [122]

    F., et al

    Yontan , T., Bilir , S., Bostanc , Z. F., et al. 2015, title CCD UBVRI photometry of NGC 6811 , , 355, 267, 10.1007/s10509-014-2175-5

    2015 doi

  112. [123]

    F., et al

    Yontan , T., Bilir , S., Bostanc , Z. F., et al. 2019, title CCD UBV photometric and Gaia astrometric study of eight open clusters ASCC 115, Collinder 421, NGC 6793, NGC 7031, NGC 7039, NGC 7086, Roslund 1 and Stock 21 , , 364, 152, 10.1007/s10509-019-3640-y

    2019 doi

  113. [124]

    2021, title A study of open clusters Frolov 1 and NGC 7510 using CCD UBV photometry and Gaia DR2 astrometry , Astronomische Nachrichten, 342, 538, 10.1002/asna.202113837

    Yontan , T., Bilir , S., Ak , T., et al. 2021, title A study of open clusters Frolov 1 and NGC 7510 using CCD UBV photometry and Gaia DR2 astrometry , Astronomische Nachrichten, 342, 538, 10.1002/asna.202113837

    2021 doi

  114. [125]

    2022, title A Study of the NGC 1193 and NGC 1798 Open Clusters Using CCD UBV Photometric and Gaia EDR3 Data , , 58, 333, 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2022.58.02.14

    Yontan , T., C akmak , T., Bilir , S., et al. 2022, title A Study of the NGC 1193 and NGC 1798 Open Clusters Using CCD UBV Photometric and Gaia EDR3 Data , , 58, 333, 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2022.58.02.14

    2022 doi

  115. [126]

    Yousef Alzahrani , A., Haroon , A., Elsanhoury , W., & C nar , D. C. 2025, title An In-depth Analysis of Photometric and Kinematic Characteristics of SAI 16, SAI 81 and SAI 86 Open Clusters Utilizing Gaia DR3 , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.15344, 10.48550/arXiv.2504.15344

    2025 doi arXiv

  116. [127]

    2025, title Unveiling the Origins and Dynamics of the Hierarchical Triple Star System CN Lyn , , 169, 71, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad9d46

    Y \"u cel , G., Bak s , V., Canbay , R., et al. 2025, title Unveiling the Origins and Dynamics of the Hierarchical Triple Star System CN Lyn , , 169, 71, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad9d46

    2025 doi

  117. [128]

    2024, title The Fundamental Parameters and Evolutionary Status of V454 Aurigae , Physics and Astronomy Reports, 2, 18, 10.26650/PAR.2024.00003

    Y\"ucel , G., Canbay , R., & Bak s , V. 2024, title The Fundamental Parameters and Evolutionary Status of V454 Aurigae , Physics and Astronomy Reports, 2, 18, 10.26650/PAR.2024.00003

    2024

  118. [129]

    T., Girard , T

    Zacharias , N., Finch , C. T., Girard , T. M., et al. 2013, title The Fourth US Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog (UCAC4) , , 145, 44, 10.1088/0004-6256/145/2/44

    2013 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.