Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 121 references

Modelling the 3D atmospheric structure of the cold Jupiter WD1856+534b orbiting a white dwarf

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The thermal spectrum of a single cold Jupiter can reveal its internal heat and metal content.

desk verdict First 3D GCM of a white-dwarf cold Jupiter with clean grid and archived data, but cloudy simulations are required before its H2O-based diagnostics are calibrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05422 v1 pith:IDY5C3B7 submitted 2025-07-07 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

Pascal A. Noti , Elspeth K.H. Lee , Daniel Kitzmann , Ryan MacDonald , Sydney Jenkins , Arjun Savel , Mary Anne Limbach , Christoph Mordasini This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords coldJupiterwhitedwarfplanets3Dgeneralcirculationmodelatmosphericchemistryemissionspectroscopyinternaltemperaturemetallicitydiagnosticsexoplanetatmospheres
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that emission spectroscopy of WD-1856b, the only known cold Jupiter outside the Solar System, can determine two hidden properties of the planet: its internal temperature and its atmospheric metallicity. Across six 3D general-circulation simulations (1x, 10x, and 100x solar composition at internal temperatures of 100 K and 500 K), the authors find that the absorption strengths of CH4, H2O, CO, and CO2 in the thermal spectrum track the internal temperature, while abundance ratios such as H2O/CO at high internal temperature and N2/NH3 at low internal temperature track the metallicity. If this is right, a single JWST emission spectrum can choose among the six modeled states and turn this one object into a benchmark for understanding how Jupiter-mass planets cool and acquire heavy elements.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a 3D general-circulation model with online gas-phase kinetics for thirteen species, coupled to correlated-k radiative transfer, with the resulting abundances post-processed into synthetic emission spectra by a 3D Monte Carlo radiative-transfer code. The load-bearing mechanism is chemical quenching: vertical mixing freezes disequilibrium abundances at deep pressures and transports them into the photosphere, so the observable band strengths of CH4, H2O, CO, and CO2 encode the deep temperature and metallicity rather than the local equilibrium chemistry.

What would settle it

Measure WD-1856b's emission spectrum between about 2 and 12 µm with JWST and compare the CH4, H2O, CO, and CO2 band strengths against the six synthetic spectra; if the observed methane-to-carbon-monoxide ratio falls between the 100 K and 500 K predictions, or if water features are far weaker than every gas-phase model, the quenching/cloud-free chemistry mechanism is insufficient.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a set of concrete spectral diagnostics: in the simulated planetary flux of WD-1856b, pronounced CH4 and H2O absorption marks a cold interior (100 K), especially at high metallicity, while strong CO and CO2 absorption marks a warm interior (500 K). At high internal temperature the H2O-to-CO abundance ratio is a metallicity indicator; at low internal temperature the N2-to-NH3 ratio plays that role. The paper further shows that the cold 1x and 10x solar cases produce a Jupiter-like hierarchy of H2O, CH4, and NH3, whereas the 100x solar cold case produces much more CH4 and H2O. These predictions are made from synthetic emission spectra generated by post-processing the 3D circulation and chemistry output with a Monte Carlo radiative-transfer code.

Load-bearing premise

The predicted spectral diagnostics assume a cloud-free atmosphere, even though the models themselves predict water clouds in several cases; if those clouds form and are radiatively active, the temperature, circulation, and emitted spectrum could all change, weakening the abundance-ratio indicators.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A JWST emission spectrum of WD-1856b can distinguish the six modeled states by comparing the CH4/H2O versus CO/CO2 band strengths.
  • If the planet is cold and near solar metallicity, its observable chemistry should resemble Jupiter's, with H2O, CH4, and NH3 as the main carriers of O, C, and N.
  • If the planet is cold and 100x solar, CH4 and H2O should rise to roughly one percent mixing ratios, producing much stronger water and methane features.
  • Water clouds are expected in the cold cases and in the warm 100x solar case, so gas-phase H2O and its spectral features should be somewhat depleted in the upper atmosphere.
  • The abundance ratios H2O/CO (warm interior) and N2/NH3 (cold interior) serve as metallicity diagnostics that can be read from the same spectrum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same band-ratio diagnostics could in principle be extended to other cold giant exoplanets and directly imaged planets, where internal temperature is often unknown; the ratios offer a way to separate internal luminosity from irradiation.
  • If the observed spectrum shows strong CO and CO2 while the independently estimated internal temperature is low, that would imply hidden heat sources such as tidal dissipation or a recent common-envelope episode, which the paper's Tint range does not cover.
  • A testable extension is to check whether the predicted water-cloud depletion produces a characteristic weakening of the 2.7 and 6.3 µm water bands relative to the cloud-free models; a JWST phase curve could test this directly.
  • Because the paper's diagnostics rely on gas-phase quenching, adding photochemistry from the white dwarf's ultraviolet flux might change the N2/NH3 and HCN abundances, so the cold-metallicity indicator should be checked once photochemical models are available.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the first 3D general circulation model (GCM) study of the cold Jupiter WD 1856+534 b, a planet orbiting a white dwarf. The authors use Exo-FMS with correlated-k radiative transfer, mixing-length theory, and the mini-chem kinetics scheme, running a 2x2 grid in internal temperature (100 K and 500 K) and metallicity (1x, 10x, 100x solar). They post-process the GCM output with gCMCRT to produce synthetic emission spectra and brightness temperature curves. The central claim is that simulated absorption features of CH4, H2O, CO, and CO2, as well as abundance ratios such as H2O/CO and N2/NH3, can serve as observational diagnostics of the planet's internal temperature and metallicity, and that these diagnostics can be tested with current and future JWST observations. The paper also compares its T-p profiles with 1D models (ATMO2020, Sonora Bobcat) and with the retrieved temperature from Limbach et al. (2025), and it discusses implications for the atmospheric dynamics and chemistry of cold giant planets.

Significance. If the proposed diagnostics are robust, this paper provides a useful interpretative framework for JWST observations of WD 1856+534 b, currently the only detected cold Jupiter outside the Solar System. The work is reproducible: simulation outputs are archived on Zenodo, the codes are available on GitHub, and the model setup is described in detail. The internal trends (warmer core and higher metallicity favor CO/CO2; colder cases favor H2O/CH4) are thermochemically consistent. However, the central diagnostic claim rests on cloud-free gas-phase chemistry, while the model itself predicts H2O condensation in exactly the regimes where H2O is proposed as an indicator. The manuscript acknowledges this limitation but does not quantify its effect on the abundances or the spectra. The significance is therefore conditional on the sensitivity of the diagnostics to clouds and condensation, which is currently unassessed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5 (with Figures 1/2 and Section 6)] The cloud-free assumption is load-bearing for the proposed Tint and metallicity diagnostics. The model predicts temperatures below the H2O dew point in all Tint = 100 K cases and in the warm 100x solar case (Section 3), and Section 6 states that H2O is 'likely removed by cloud formation and rain out' in those regimes. Yet the proposed H2O-based indicators (H2O/CO at high Tint, H2O absorption features, and the H2O abundances in the cold cases) are computed from gas-phase chemistry that does not include condensation. Section 5 acknowledges that 'we did not simulate haze, clouds, and condensation processes,' but then expects 'minor depletions' without a quantitative calculation; the Jupiter-based analogy is not justified for the much higher H2O abundances predicted here. Radiatively active clouds would also change the temperature structure, circulation, and quench levels, feeding back on every proposed abundance ratio. I request either a sensitivity test (e.g., removing condensate H2O above the cloud base and recomputing spectra) or an explicit reframing of the diagnostics as valid only for a cloud-free atmosphere.
  2. [Sections 4 and 6] The proposed metallicity indicators are not stated consistently. Section 4 states that at high Tint the N2/CH4 abundance ratio is a good metallicity indicator and that 'there is a similar analogy with the abundance ratio of H2O to CO,' while Section 6 lists only H2O/CO as the high-Tint metallicity indicator and omits N2/CH4. The paper should present a single, unified list of diagnostics, state which ratios apply in which Tint and metallicity regimes, and provide quantitative thresholds (e.g., the ratio values that distinguish 1x, 10x, and 100x solar) so that the claimed indicators can be tested against future data.
  3. [Section 5] The comparison with Limbach et al. (2025) is qualitative and posterior: the paper states that the cold cases are 'in line with' the retrieved Teff = 184 K, but no synthetic spectrum or model photometry is quantitatively compared with the observed MIRI data. Given that the stated motivation is to support the interpretation of these JWST observations, a quantitative comparison (e.g., synthetic MIRI photometry versus the observed flux ratios, or a chi-square assessment) would materially strengthen the claim that the modeled cold cases are compatible with the data.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Throughout] The object name is rendered inconsistently as 'WD-1856b+534b' in the abstract and Section 1; the standard designation is WD 1856+534 b (or WD-1856b for short after first definition).
  2. [Figure 1 and Figure 2 captions] The phrase 'the the dew point' should be 'the dew point' in both figure captions.
  3. [Section 5] The sentence 'Rhis radiative feedback from more abundant heavier elements therefore explains...' contains a typo: 'Rhis' should be 'This'.
  4. [Table 3 caption] The word 'presetned' in the caption should be 'presented'.
  5. [Section 6] The sentence 'The decreasing order of chemical species are line with Rensen et al. (2023)' should read 'The decreasing order of chemical species is in line with Rensen et al. (2023)'.
  6. [Data Availability] The phrase 'GGM simulation output' should be 'GCM simulation output'.
  7. [Section 3] The sentence 'The colourbar indicate its coordinates' in the Figure 1 caption is grammatically incomplete; it should be 'the colourbar indicates the coordinates'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the simulated chemistry and spectra are forward-model outputs, not fitted to or defined by the target observations.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are forward-model outputs, not reductions to fit parameters. The chain is Exo-FMS + mini-chem + gCMCRT with explicitly stated boundary parameters (Tint = 100/500 K, [M/H] = 0/1/2), followed by qualitative comparison to Limbach et al. (2025). No abundance, spectrum, or diagnostic ratio is fitted to the JWST data: the proposed Tint and metallicity indicators in Section 4 are read off the simulated abundance fields, not tuned to reproduce them. The model components are cited from prior work, including several by the same group (e.g. Lee et al. 2021, 2022b, 2024; Tsai et al. 2022), but these citations function as code and validation references rather than as load-bearing evidence for the present predictions; the outputs are publicly released, so the derivation is reproducible. There is no imported uniqueness theorem, no ansatz smuggled in via citation, and no renaming of a known empirical pattern. The explicit cloud-free limitation (Section 5: 'we did not simulate haze, clouds, and condensation processes') is a robustness/validity caveat, not a circular step, because the cloud-free assumption is not constructed to guarantee the predicted H2O depletion; the paper separately asserts that H2O would be moderately reduced, but that assertion is an unquantified modeling limitation rather than a prediction that reduces to its input by construction. Therefore the paper shows no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on a grid of chosen internal temperatures and metallicities plus a set of modeling assumptions inherited from prior GCM work. There are no new physical entities, particles, or forces. The most consequential unmodeled element is the absence of cloud microphysics, which directly interacts with the paper's main spectral and chemical predictions.

free parameters (4)
  • Internal temperature T_int = 100 K and 500 K
    Chosen as lower and upper bounds from an approximate cooling formula (Eq. 2); the actual value is unknown. The paper's thermal structure, chemistry, and spectra differ strongly across the two values.
  • Metallicity [M/H] = 0, 1, 2 dex (1x, 10x, 100x solar)
    Chosen because the metallicity is unconstrained and the red-giant phase may have enriched the atmosphere. This grid drives the chemical abundances and spectral diagnostics.
  • Basal Rayleigh drag timescale tau_drag = 1e6 s with pressure threshold 1e7 Pa
    Introduced to stabilize the deep atmosphere in the GCM, following prior models. It is not derived from observations of this planet and can affect the circulation strength.
  • Mixing length theory parameters alpha and beta = alpha = 1, beta = 2.2
    Adopted from prior Lee et al. studies; not constrained for WD 1856+534 b. They set the convective adjustment and tracer diffusion in the model.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The planet is tidally locked with synchronous rotation and rotation period equal to the 1.4-day orbital period.
    Section 2, Eq. (1): with tidal dissipation factor Q = 1e5, the spin-down time is about 9.47e4 Earth years, much shorter than the system age of 7.93 Gyr. If this assumption failed, day-night heat redistribution, winds, and spectra would change.
  • domain assumption The Exo-FMS primitive equation dynamical core adequately represents the circulation of this deep, slowly rotating planet.
    Section 2 and Section 5: the model uses the hot Jupiter configuration at C48 resolution. The authors note in Section 5 that primitive equation models tend to overestimate wind speeds, and Appendix A states the shallow-water WTG theory is not suitable for the large depth of the planet.
  • domain assumption The reduced mini-chem network with 13 species and 10 reactions, without photochemistry, captures the disequilibrium chemistry relevant for spectra.
    Section 2.1: the scheme omits photochemistry and many species, yet the resulting abundances are fed back into the radiative transfer. Upper-atmosphere chemistry and the proposed diagnostics depend on this reduced network.
  • domain assumption TiO, VO, Fe, Na, and K are condensed out and absent as gas-phase opacity sources.
    Section 2.4: the authors assume these species rain out due to the cold temperatures. This affects shortwave absorption, temperature structure, and the resulting emission spectra.
  • domain assumption The atmosphere is cloud-free in the GCM, with no condensation or haze microphysics.
    Section 5: the authors state 'we did not simulate haze, clouds, and condensation processes.' Yet cloud formation and H2O depletion are part of the stated results, making this assumption directly load-bearing for the spectral predictions.
  • domain assumption Variable specific heat capacity in the radiative and mixing-length calculations, while the dynamical core uses a constant value.
    Section 2.5: this hybrid treatment is an approximation; the mismatch between the dynamical core and the physics schemes could affect the deep adiabat and lapse rates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modelling the 3D atmospheric structure of the cold Jupiter WD1856+534b orbiting a white dwarf." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IDY5C3B7

@misc{pith2026250705422,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modelling the 3D atmospheric structure of the cold Jupiter WD1856+534b orbiting a white dwarf},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IDY5C3B7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05422}
}
read the original abstract

WD-1856b+534b (WD-1856b) is to date the only detected cold Jupiter outside of our Solar System. This cold Jupiter can provide useful information about the cold giants in our Solar System. Recent JWST observations have targeted WD-1856b, with more scheduled in the near future. To support the interpretation of these observations, we simulated WD-1856b using a three-dimensional (3D) General Circulation Model (GCM) and produced synthetic emission spectra of the planet. We used the Exo-FMS GCM with correlated-k radiative transfer (RT) and mixing-length theory (MLT). In addition, we included abundances of 13 chemical species using the thermochemical kinetic model mini-chem. Because there are substantial uncertainties in the metallicity and internal temperature of WD-1856b, we ran simulations with 1x, 10x, and 100x solar compositions and at low and high internal temperatures (100 K and 500 K). We generated emission spectra and brightness temperature curves with the GCM output using the 3D Monte Carlo radiative-transfer code gCMCRT. Our results suggest larger volume mixing ratios (VMR) of CO and \CO2 with a warmer core at higher metallicity. With a colder core, H2O and CH4 become more relevant and increase to 0.01 VMR at 100x Solar. We suggest possible \H2O cloud formation in the upper atmosphere in the warm 100x solar case and in all cold cases, which may reduce gas phase H2O in the upper atmosphere moderately.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05422 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. T-p profiles (left column) of WD-1856b and horizontally averaged chemical abundances (right column) produced by the GCM in the 1x, 10x, and 100x Solar cases and at 𝑇int = 500 K. For the T-p profiles (left column), the coloured lines indicate vertical profiles along the equator and the colourbar indicate its coordinates. The dark grey lines show the T-p profiles at latitudes 87°N and 87°S. The bold coloured lines rep… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. T-p profiles (left column) of WD-1856b and horizontally averaged chemical abundances (right column) produced by the GCM in the 1x, 10x, and 100x Solar cases and at 𝑇int = 100 K. For the T-p profiles (left column), the coloured lines indicate vertical profiles along the equator and the colourbar indicate its coordinates. The dark grey lines show the T-p profiles at latitudes 87°N and 87°S. The bold coloured lines rep… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Zonal mean wind and overturning circulation depicted by the mass stream-function Ψ′ (second column, tidally-locked coordinates) of WD-1856b for the 1x, 10x, and 100x Solar cases at 𝑇int = 500 K. The stream-function shows anti-clockwise and clockwise circulations in orange and in purple, respectively. high 𝑇int. At low 𝑇int, such analogies occur with the abundance ratio of N2 to NH3. 5 DISCUSSION Our simulations diff… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Zonal mean wind and overturning circulation depicted by the mass stream-function Ψ′ (second column, tidally-locked coordinates) of WD-1856b for the 1x, 10x, and 100x Solar cases at 𝑇int = 100 K. The stream-function shows anti-clockwise and clockwise circulations in ora…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Planetary spectral flux and brightness temperature of WD-1856b at a longitudinal viewing angle of 180◦ (bottom panel) based on the post￾processing of the GCM simulations for the 1x, 10x, and 100x Solar cases at 𝑇int = 500 K. The line styles denote post-processing. 0.2 …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Agol E., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/731/2/L31 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...731L..31A 731, L31

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/731/2/l31 2011

  2. [2]

    S., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629183 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...595A..36A 595, A36

    Amundsen D. S., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629183 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...595A..36A 595, A36

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629183 2016

  3. [3]

    S., Tremblin P., Manners J., Baraffe I., Mayne N

    Amundsen D. S., Tremblin P., Manners J., Baraffe I., Mayne N. J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629322 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...598A..97A 598, A97

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629322 2017

  4. [4]

    M., Grevesse N., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653A.141A 653, A141

    Asplund M., Amarsi A. M., Grevesse N., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653A.141A 653, A141

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 2021

  5. [5]

    Barnes R., Heller R., 2013, @doi [Astrobiology] 10.1089/ast.2012.0867 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AsBio..13..279B 13, 279

    arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    S., Lewis J

    Barshay S. S., Lewis J. S., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0019-1035(78)90192-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978Icar...33..593B 33, 593

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(78)90192-6 1978

  7. [7]

    Z., Adams F

    Becker J., Seligman D. Z., Adams F. C., Styczinski M. J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acbe44 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...945L..24B 945, L24

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acbe44 2023

  8. [8]

    https://bokeh.org/

    Bokeh Development Team 2022, Bokeh: Python library for interactive visualization. https://bokeh.org/

    2022

Show all 121 references
  1. [9]

    J., et al., 2017, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aal2108 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Sci...356..821B 356, 821

    Bolton S. J., et al., 2017, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aal2108 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Sci...356..821B 356, 821

    2017 doi

  2. [10]

    D., Cridland A

    Bosman A. D., Cridland A. J., Miguel Y., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936827 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...632L..11B 632, L11

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    Burrows A., Liebert J., 1993, @doi [Reviews of Modern Physics] 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.301 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993RvMP...65..301B 65, 301

    1993 doi

  4. [12]

    E., Prather M

    Carlson B. E., Prather M. J., Rossow W. B., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/165751 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...322..559C 322, 559

    1987 doi

  5. [13]

    Carri \'o n-Gonz \'a lez \'O ., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346621 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674L...3C 674, L3

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    L., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2721 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.447.3218C 447, 3218

    Casewell S. L., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2721 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.447.3218C 447, 3218

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    G., Nordhaus J., Wilson E., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slab017 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.502L.110C 502, L110

    Chamandy L., Blackman E. G., Nordhaus J., Wilson E., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slab017 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.502L.110C 502, L110

    2021 doi

  8. [16]

    Charnay B., Blain D., B \'e zard B., Leconte J., Turbet M., Falco A., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...646A.171C 646, A171

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    G., 1963, @doi [Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences] 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0607:ANOLSM>2.0.CO;2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1963JAtS...20..607C 20, 607

    Charney J. G., 1963, @doi [Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences] 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0607:ANOLSM>2.0.CO;2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1963JAtS...20..607C 20, 607

    1963 doi

  10. [18]

    W., 1986, JANAF thermochemical tables

    Chase M. W., 1986, JANAF thermochemical tables

    1986

  11. [19]

    A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/PSJ/ac9dfe , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PSJ.....3..261C 3, 261

    Christie D. A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/PSJ/ac9dfe , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PSJ.....3..261C 3, 261

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    L., Tennyson J., Yurchenko S

    Chubb K. L., Tennyson J., Yurchenko S. N., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa229 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.1531C 493, 1531

    2020 doi

  13. [21]

    A., Yurchenko S

    Coles P. A., Yurchenko S. N., Tennyson J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2778 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.4638C 490, 4638

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    Dawson A., 2016, @doi [Journal of Open Research Software] 10.5334/jors.129

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    H., Sigurdsson S., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...572..556D 572, 556

    Debes J. H., Sigurdsson S., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...572..556D 572, 556

    2002 doi

  16. [24]

    M., Schroffenegger U., Grimm S

    Deitrick R., Mendon c a J. M., Schroffenegger U., Grimm S. L., Tsai S.-M., Heng K., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab930e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..248...30D 248, 30

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    Duer K., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1029/2021GL095651 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021GeoRL..4895651D 48, e95651

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    Elson P., et al., 2022, SciTools/cartopy: v0.21.1, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.7430317 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7430317

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    B., Lodders K., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1006/icar.1994.1111 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994Icar..110..117F 110, 117

    Fegley Jr. B., Lodders K., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1006/icar.1994.1111 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994Icar..110..117F 110, 117

    1994

  20. [28]

    N., et al., 2021, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)] 10.1029/2021JE006858 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021JGRE..12606858F 126, e06858

    Fletcher L. N., et al., 2021, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)] 10.1029/2021JE006858 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021JGRE..12606858F 126, e06858

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    A., Patel M

    Fossati L., Bagnulo S., Haswell C. A., Patel M. R., Busuttil R., Kowalski P. M., Shulyak D. V., Sterzik M. F., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/757/1/L15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757L..15F 757, L15

    2012 doi

  22. [30]

    S., Ackerman A

    Gao P., Marley M. S., Ackerman A. S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab0a1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...855...86G 855, 86

    2018 doi

  23. [31]

    Garc \' a-Melendo E., P \'e rez-Hoyos S., S \'a nchez-Lavega A., Hueso R., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.07.005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011Icar..215...62G 215, 62

    2011 doi

  24. [32]

    Grassi D., et al., 2020, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)] 10.1029/2019JE006206 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020JGRE..12506206G 125, e06206

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    Guillot T., Morel P., 1995, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995A&AS..109..109G 109, 109

    1995

  26. [34]

    B., Lunine J

    Guillot T., Burrows A., Hubbard W. B., Lunine J. I., Saumon D., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309935 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...459L..35G 459, L35

    1996 doi

  27. [35]

    J., Atreya S

    Guillot T., Stevenson D. J., Atreya S. K., Bolton S. J., Becker H. N., 2020a, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)] 10.1029/2020JE00640310.1002/essoar.10502154.1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020JGRE..12506403G 125, e06403

  28. [36]

    Guillot T., et al., 2020b, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)] 10.1029/2020JE00640410.1002/essoar.10502179.1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020JGRE..12506404G 125, e06404

  29. [37]

    N., Helled R., Ikoma M., Line M

    Guillot T., Fletcher L. N., Helled R., Ikoma M., Line M. R., Paramentier V., 2023, in Inutsuka S., Aikawa Y., Muto T., Tomida K., Tamura M., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII. p. 947 ( @eprint arXiv 2205.04100 ), @d...

    2023 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    pp EPSC--DPS2019--919

    Hargreaves R., Gordon I., Kochanov R., Rothman L., 2019, in EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019. pp EPSC--DPS2019--919

    2019

  31. [39]

    J., Gordon I

    Hargreaves R. J., Gordon I. E., Rey M., Nikitin A. V., Tyuterev V. G., Kochanov R. V., Rothman L. S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab7a1a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..247...55H 247, 55

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    J., Tennyson J., Kaminsky B

    Harris G. J., Tennyson J., Kaminsky B. M., Pavlenko Y. V., Jones H. R. A., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09960.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.367..400H 367, 400

    2006

  33. [41]

    R., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Natur.585..357H 585, 357

    Harris C. R., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Natur.585..357H 585, 357

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    Helled R., Lunine J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu516 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.441.2273H 441, 2273

    2014 doi

  35. [43]

    Howard S., Guillot T., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244851 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...672L...1H 672, L1

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    Howard S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245625 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...672A..33H 672, A33

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    Hoyer S., Hamman J., 2017, @doi [Journal of Open Research Software] 10.5334/jors.148

    2017 doi

  38. [46]

    D., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science and Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007CSE.....9...90H 9, 90

    Hunter J. D., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science and Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007CSE.....9...90H 9, 90

    2007 doi

  39. [47]

    P., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1002/2017GL074277 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017GeoRL..44.7676I 44, 7676

    Ingersoll A. P., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1002/2017GL074277 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017GeoRL..44.7676I 44, 7676

    2017 doi

  40. [48]

    Jones E., Oliphant T., Peterson P., et al., 2001, SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python, https://www.scipy.org

    2001

  41. [49]

    Karkoschka E., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.05.013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011Icar..215..439K 215, 439

    2011 doi

  42. [50]

    Karman T., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2019.02.034 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Icar..328..160K 328, 160

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    P., Lewis N

    Kataria T., Showman A. P., Lewis N. K., Fortney J. J., Marley M. S., Freedman R. S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/76 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767...76K 767, 76

    2013 doi

  44. [52]

    Kempton E. M. R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-06159-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.620...67K 620, 67

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    IOS Press Ebooks, pp 87--90, @doi 10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87

    Kluyver T., et al., 2016, in , IOS Press. IOS Press Ebooks, pp 87--90, @doi 10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87

    2016 doi

  46. [54]

    D., Tan X., Gao P., Lee E

    Komacek T. D., Tan X., Gao P., Lee E. K. H., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7723 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934...79K 934, 79

    2022 doi

  47. [55]

    Kozakis T., Lin Z., Kaltenegger L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab6f6a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...894L...6K 894, L6

    2020 doi

  48. [56]

    R., Zorotovic M., G \"a nsicke B

    Lagos F., Schreiber M. R., Zorotovic M., G \"a nsicke B. T., Ronco M. P., Hamers A. S., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3703 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501..676L 501, 676

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    Lee E. K. H., Parmentier V., Hammond M., Grimm S. L., Kitzmann D., Tan X., Tsai S.-M., Pierrehumbert R. T., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1851 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.2695L 506, 2695

    2021 doi

  50. [58]

    Lee E. K. H., Prinoth B., Kitzmann D., Tsai S.-M., Hoeijmakers J., Borsato N. W., Heng K., 2022a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2246 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517..240L 517, 240

    doi

  51. [59]

    Lee E. K. H., et al., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac61d6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...929..180L 929, 180

    doi

  52. [60]

    Lee E. K. H., Tan X., Tsai S.-M., 2023a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1715 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.4477L 523, 4477

    doi

  53. [61]

    Lee E. K. H., Tsai S.-M., Hammond M., Tan X., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245473 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...672A.110L 672, A110

    doi

  54. [62]

    Lee E. K. H., Tan X., Tsai S.-M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae537 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.2686L 529, 2686

    2024 doi

  55. [63]

    E., Rothman L

    Li G., Gordon I. E., Rothman L. S., Tan Y., Hu S.-M., Kassi S., Campargue A., Medvedev E. S., 2015, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1088/0067-0049/216/1/15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015ApJS..216...15L 216, 15

    2015 doi

  56. [64]

    Li C., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1002/2017GL073159 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017GeoRL..44.5317L 44, 5317

    2017 doi

  57. [65]

    Li C., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-020-1009-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020NatAs...4..609L 4, 609

    2020 doi

  58. [66]

    Li C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116028 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Icar..41416028L 414, 116028

    2024

  59. [67]

    A., et al., 2025, Thermal Emission and Confirmation of the Frigid White Dwarf Exoplanet WD 1856+534b ( @eprint arXiv 2504.16982 ), https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16982

    Limbach M. A., et al., 2025, Thermal Emission and Confirmation of the Frigid White Dwarf Exoplanet WD 1856+534b ( @eprint arXiv 2504.16982 ), https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16982

    2025 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Loeb A., Maoz D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slt026 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432L..11L 432, L11

    2013 doi

  61. [69]

    J., et al., 2021, Under the Light of a Dead Star: Revealing the Atmospheric Composition of a White Dwarf Planet , JWST Proposal

    MacDonald R. J., et al., 2021, Under the Light of a Dead Star: Revealing the Atmospheric Composition of a White Dwarf Planet , JWST Proposal. Cycle 1, ID. \#2358

    2021

  62. [70]

    F., Villaver E., Mustill A

    Maldonado R. F., Villaver E., Mustill A. J., Ch \'a vez M., Bertone E., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa193 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501L..43M 501, L43

    2021 doi

  63. [71]

    T., Lee E

    Malsky I., Rauscher E., Roman M. T., Lee E. K. H., Beltz H., Savel A., Kempton E. M. R., Cinque L., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b70 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961...66M 961, 66

    2024 doi

  64. [72]

    S., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac141d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...920...85M 920, 85

    Marley M. S., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac141d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...920...85M 920, 85

    2021 doi

  65. [73]

    C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-024-07837-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Natur.633..789M 633, 789

    Matthews E. C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-024-07837-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Natur.633..789M 633, 789

    2024 doi

  66. [74]

    J., Drummond B., Debras F., Jaupart E., Manners J., Boutle I

    Mayne N. J., Drummond B., Debras F., Jaupart E., Manners J., Boutle I. A., Baraffe I., Kohary K., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf6e9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...871...56M 871, 56

    2019 doi

  67. [75]

    Exeter, Devon, https://scitools.org.uk/cartopy

    Met Office 2010 - 2015, Cartopy: a cartographic python library with a Matplotlib interface. Exeter, Devon, https://scitools.org.uk/cartopy

    2010

  68. [76]

    Miguel Y., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243207 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...662A..18M 662, A18

    2022 doi

  69. [77]

    E., Heng K., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab35d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...858....1M 858, 1

    Mohandas G., Pessah M. E., Heng K., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab35d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...858....1M 858, 1

    2018 doi

  70. [78]

    I., Alibert Y., Fletcher L

    Mousis O., Marboeuf U., Lunine J. I., Alibert Y., Fletcher L. N., Orton G. S., Pauzat F., Ellinger Y., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1348 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696.1348M 696, 1348

    2009 doi

  71. [79]

    J., Petrovich C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abc564 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...904L...3M 904, L3

    Mu \ n oz D. J., Petrovich C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abc564 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...904L...3M 904, L3

    2020 doi

  72. [80]

    A., Lee E

    Noti P. A., Lee E. K. H., Deitrick R., Hammond M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2042 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.3396N 524, 3396

    2023 doi

  73. [81]

    E., Liu B., Lai D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3723 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501..507O 501, 507

    O'Connor C. E., Liu B., Lai D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3723 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501..507O 501, 507

    2021 doi

  74. [82]

    I., Wordsworth R., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab46a8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158..194O 158, 194

    \"O berg K. I., Wordsworth R., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab46a8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158..194O 158, 194

    2019 doi

  75. [83]

    Ohno K., Zhang X., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab06cc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...874....1O 874, 1

    2019 doi

  76. [84]

    J., Showman A

    Parmentier V., Fortney J. J., Showman A. P., Morley C., Marley M. S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/22 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...828...22P 828, 22

    2016 doi

  77. [85]

    P., Fortney J

    Parmentier V., Showman A. P., Fortney J. J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3418 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501...78P 501, 78

    2021 doi

  78. [86]

    W., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937381 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...637A..38P 637, A38

    Phillips M. W., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937381 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...637A..38P 637, A38

    2020 doi

  79. [87]

    T., Ding F., 2016, @doi [Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A] 10.1098/rspa.2016.0107 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RSPSA.47260107P 472, 20160107

    Pierrehumbert R. T., Ding F., 2016, @doi [Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A] 10.1098/rspa.2016.0107 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RSPSA.47260107P 472, 20160107

    2016

  80. [88]

    T., Hammond M., 2019, @doi [Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics] 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040516 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AnRFM..51..275P 51, 275

    Pierrehumbert R. T., Hammond M., 2019, @doi [Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics] 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040516 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AnRFM..51..275P 51, 275

    2019 doi

  81. [89]

    L., Kyuberis A

    Polyansky O. L., Kyuberis A. A., Zobov N. F., Tennyson J., Yurchenko S. N., Lodi L., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1877 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.2597P 480, 2597

    2018 doi

  82. [90]

    C., et al., 2003, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1079462 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003Sci...299.1541P 299, 1541

    Porco C. C., et al., 2003, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1079462 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003Sci...299.1541P 299, 1541

    2003 doi

  83. [91]

    Powell D., Zhang X., Gao P., Parmentier V., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac215 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...860...18P 860, 18

    2018 doi

  84. [92]

    Rauscher E., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa81c3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...846...69R 846, 69

    2017 doi

  85. [93]

    Rensen F., Miguel Y., Zilinskas M., Louca A., Woitke P., Helling C., Herbort O., 2023, @doi [Remote Sensing] 10.3390/rs15030841 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023RemS...15..841R 15, 841

    2023 doi

  86. [94]

    R., et al., 2014, in Oschmann Jacobus M

    Ricker G. R., et al., 2014, in Oschmann Jacobus M. J., Clampin M., Fazio G. G., MacEwen H. A., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 9143, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave. p. 9143...

    2014 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Roman M., Rauscher E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aafdb5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...872....1R 872, 1

    2019 doi

  88. [96]

    T., Kempton E

    Roman M. T., Kempton E. M. R., Rauscher E., Harada C. K., Bean J. L., Stevenson K. B., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abd549 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...908..101R 908, 101

    2021 doi

  89. [97]

    Sainsbury-Martinez F., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1905 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.1316S 524, 1316

    2023 doi

  90. [98]

    P., Fortney J

    Showman A. P., Fortney J. J., Lian Y., Marley M. S., Freedman R. S., Knutson H. A., Charbonneau D., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/564 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...699..564S 699, 564

    2009 doi

  91. [99]

    P., Lewis N

    Showman A. P., Lewis N. K., Fortney J. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/95 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...801...95S 801, 95

    2015 doi

  92. [100]

    H., Nilsson J., Polvani L

    Sobel A. H., Nilsson J., Polvani L. M., 2001, @doi [Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences] 10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<3650:TWTGAA>2.0.CO;2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001JAtS...58.3650S 58, 3650

    2001 doi

  93. [101]

    S., Burrows A., Milsom J

    Spiegel D. S., Burrows A., Milsom J. A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/727/1/57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...727...57S 727, 57

    2011 doi

  94. [102]

    A., de Pater I., Fry P

    Sromovsky L. A., de Pater I., Fry P. M., Hammel H. B., Marcus P., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.05.029 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Icar..258..192S 258, 192

    2015 doi

  95. [103]

    P., Naoz S., Gaudi B

    Stephan A. P., Naoz S., Gaudi B. S., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac22a9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...922....4S 922, 4

    2021 doi

  96. [104]

    W., Kitzmann D., Patzer A

    Stock J. W., Kitzmann D., Patzer A. B. C., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2623 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517.4070S 517, 4070

    2022 doi

  97. [105]

    Tan X., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac344 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.511.4861T 511, 4861

    2022 doi

  98. [106]

    D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a76 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886...26T 886, 26

    Tan X., Komacek T. D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a76 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886...26T 886, 26

    2019 doi

  99. [107]

    P., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0c07 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...874..111T 874, 111

    Tan X., Showman A. P., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0c07 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...874..111T 874, 111

    2019 doi

  100. [108]

    P., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab097 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.502.2198T 502, 2198

    Tan X., Showman A. P., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab097 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.502.2198T 502, 2198

    2021 doi

  101. [109]

    Teinturier L., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347069 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...683A.231T 683, A231

    2024 doi

  102. [110]

    B., McKay C

    Toon O. B., McKay C. P., Ackerman T. P., Santhanam K., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1029/JD094iD13p16287 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989JGR....9416287T 94, 16287

    1989 doi

  103. [111]

    Tsai S.-M., Lee E. K. H., Pierrehumbert R., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142816 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...664A..82T 664, A82

    2022 doi

  104. [112]

    K., 2006, Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics: Fundamentals and Large-scale Circulation

    Vallis G. K., 2006, Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics: Fundamentals and Large-scale Circulation. Cambridge University Press, @doi 10.1017/CBO9780511790447 , https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790447

    2006 doi

  105. [113]

    L., 1995, Python tutorial

    Van Rossum G., Drake Jr F. L., 1995, Python tutorial. Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica Amsterdam, The Netherlands, https://www.python.org/

    1995

  106. [114]

    Vanderburg A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-020-2713-y , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Natur.585..363V 585, 363

    2020 doi

  107. [115]

    Visscher C., 2020, @doi [Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)] 10.1029/2020JE006526 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020JGRE..12506526V 125, e06526

    2020 doi

  108. [116]

    Waskom M., 2021, @doi [The Journal of Open Source Software] 10.21105/joss.03021 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021JOSS....6.3021W 6, 3021

    2021 doi

  109. [117]

    H., Mahaffy P

    Wong M. H., Mahaffy P. R., Atreya S. K., Niemann H. B., Owen T. C., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2004.04.010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Icar..171..153W 171, 153

    2004 doi

  110. [118]

    N., Mellor T

    Yurchenko S. N., Mellor T. M., Freedman R. S., Tennyson J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1874 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.496.5282Y 496, 5282

    2020 doi

  111. [119]

    Zhan R., Koll D. D. B., Ding F., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad54c1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...971..125Z 971, 125

    2024 doi

  112. [120]

    Zuckerman B., Melis C., Klein B., Koester D., Jura M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/725 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...722..725Z 722, 725

    2010 doi

  113. [121]

    pandas development team T., 2020, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.3509134 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.