Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 165 references

A Radio Flaring, Chromospherically-Inactive K Dwarf

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that the 1.5-GHz radio emission from the quiescent K dwarf HD317101A is coherent, roughly 90% circularly polarized electron cyclotron maser radiation with a sharp spectral break near 1 GHz, implying a 0.36 kG magnetic…

desk verdict A careful observational study that makes a plausible but not yet proven case for ECM emission from a quiescent K dwarf; the headline 0.36 kG field rests on a spectral break whose low-frequency side is not directly detected. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07255 v1 pith:R5ACSZVA submitted 2025-07-09 astro-ph.SR

Dale A. Frail , Scott D. Hyman , Michele L. Silverstein , Emil Polisensky , Evangelia Tremou , Simona Giacintucci , Hodari-Sadiki Hubbard-James , Jacinda Byam
show 5 more authors
Steve B. Howell Robert F. Wilson Matthew Lastovka Tracy E. Clarke Namir E. Kassim
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords electroncyclotronmasercoherentradioemissionKdwarfstar-planetinteractioncircularpolarizationstellarmagneticfieldsultra-long-periodtransienttransients
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

A nearby, old, chromospherically quiet K dwarf is unexpectedly radio-loud, and this paper tries to establish what kind of radio engine is at work. At 1.5 GHz the star emits coherent, strongly circularly polarized bursts that persist for hours, recur with an apparent 3.7-day period, and cut off sharply near 1 GHz—properties the authors identify with electron cyclotron maser emission from a stable magnetosphere. At 3 GHz a separate, short, unpolarized burst looks like gyro-synchrotron emission. Because the star shows no chromospheric activity, the paper argues that ordinary flaring cannot explain the radio output and that auroral emission, possibly triggered by a star-planet interaction, is the best fit, while an unrelated ultra-long-period transient cannot be fully ruled out. If the interpretation holds, radio observations would give a direct measure of a stellar magnetic field and a new way to hunt for star-planet magnetic interactions around quiet stars.

What carries the argument

The central diagnostic is the electron cyclotron maser instability, a process in which energetic electrons spiraling in a magnetic field convert energy into coherent, highly circularly polarized radio emission at the gyrofrequency, with the sharp cutoff frequency related to the field strength by $\nu_c = eB/(2\pi m_e c) \simeq 2.8\,B$ (MHz per Gauss). This relation lets the observed spectral break near 1 GHz be converted into a magnetic field estimate of 0.36 kG. The argument also leans on the stability of the spectral and polarization properties across epochs as a signature of auroral, magnetospheric emission rather than stochastic flares, and on a Lomb-Scargle periodogram that finds a 3.72-day periodicity in the 1.5-GHz light curve.

What would settle it

Very long baseline interferometry at 1.5 GHz can measure the radio position to milliarcsecond accuracy; if the source is offset from HD317101A by more than the astrometric uncertainty, or lands on a different star, the positional association and every stellar conclusion in the paper collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors find that the radio source J180526−292953, coincident with the nearby K7V star HD317101A, shows two distinct radio behaviors. The 1.5-GHz emission has a brightness temperature near $5\times10^{11}$ K, circular polarization $V/I\approx+90\%$, an extremely steep spectrum above a break at roughly 1.06 GHz, and an apparent 3.72-day periodicity; these are the hallmarks of electron cyclotron maser emission, and the sharp cutoff implies a gyrofrequency near 1 GHz and a magnetic field $B=0.36$ kG. The 3-GHz emission, detected once in archival VLASS data, is a flat-spectrum, unpolarized burst lasting seconds to minutes, consistent with gyro-synchrotron radiation. High-resolution spectroscopy shows HD317101A to be a mature, slowly rotating, chromospherically inactive dwarf, and Gaia astrometry plus speckle imaging indicate a close M5.5V companion on a 1100-day orbit. The paper evaluates chromospheric activity, auroral emission, and an ultra-long-period transient as origins, ruling out the first and favoring the second, while noting that the dominant stellar source of the ECM emission remains uncertain.

Load-bearing premise

The radio source is physically the star HD317101A; if the positional coincidence is chance and the emission actually comes from a fainter background object or an unrelated ultra-long-period transient inside the roughly 0.7 arcsecond error circle, the stellar and auroral interpretations collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the 1.5-GHz emission is confirmed as ECM, the sharp spectral cutoff provides a direct measurement of a 0.36 kG magnetic field in an old, inactive star, a quantity that is otherwise difficult to obtain.
  • A confirmed 3.7-day periodicity would make HD317101A one of the strongest candidates for a Jupiter-Io-like star-planet interaction, where a close-in planet drives auroral currents on the star.
  • The coexistence of coherent ECM at 1.5 GHz and a flat-spectrum, unpolarized burst at 3 GHz shows that a single system can host two radio emission mechanisms, which complicates simple classification schemes.
  • The absence of chromospheric activity and X-ray flaring indicates that radio surveys can uncover magnetized inactive stars that would be missed by optical or X-ray activity selection.
  • If future VLBI observations place the radio emission on the M5.5 companion rather than the K dwarf, the auroral interpretation would be supported, while placement on the K star would strengthen the star-planet interaction case.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If both the 3.7-day radio period and the roughly 14-day rotation period suggested by TESS are confirmed, the ratio could point to a rotational harmonic or beat with an unseen companion, a possibility the paper does not explicitly develop.
  • The authors' logic implies that other radio-loud, X-ray-quiet inactive K dwarfs may be hiding in existing survey data, and a directed search around Gaia-quiescent K stars could find additional examples.
  • The planned longer TESS observations could act as a discriminator: a detected flare on the M dwarf would favor chromospheric activity, while continued quiescence and a null transit search would strengthen the auroral interpretation.
  • If the ULPT hypothesis is ever confirmed for this source, the positional coincidence with HD317101A would be a cautionary tale for associating radio transients with stellar counterparts using arcsecond-level positions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports multi-epoch radio observations of J180526−292953, a source positionally coincident with the nearby K dwarf HD 317101A. At 1.5 GHz the source shows highly circularly polarized (V/I ≈ 90%), steep-spectrum (α ≈ −5.5) variable emission with a suggested sharp spectral break near 1 GHz and a possible 3.7-day periodicity; this is interpreted as electron cyclotron maser (ECM) emission with a magnetic field of B = 0.36 kG. A single 3 GHz burst with a flat spectrum and no detected polarization suggests a distinct gyro-synchrotron component. Optical spectroscopy and speckle imaging characterize the primary as a mature, chromospherically inactive K7V star with an M5.5 companion. The authors evaluate chromospheric activity, auroral/star-planet interaction (SPI), and ultra-long-period transient (ULPT) origins, favoring an auroral origin while leaving the dominant stellar source uncertain.

Significance. If the spectral break and the stellar association hold, this is a rare example of coherent ECM emission from a chromospherically inactive K dwarf, with implications for stellar magnetic fields and possible star-planet interactions. The paper's strengths include the use of multiple radio telescopes and epochs, proper-motion-corrected astrometry, speckle contrast limits that constrain contaminating stars, detailed spectroscopic stellar characterization, and an explicit discussion of alternative interpretations including ULPTs. The 1.5 GHz polarization and spectral properties are genuinely unusual and merit attention.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.1.1, §2.1.3, §3.1] The inference B = 0.36 kG from the spectral break is not yet supported by the data as presented. In §2.1.1 a single power law with α = −4.4 is stated to be an acceptable fit, and the low-frequency slope of the broken power law is 'not well constrained'; the quoted break frequencies depend on assuming the broken-power-law model. The evidence for a turnover below 1 GHz comes from non-simultaneous TGSS, VLITE, and ASKAP upper limits, which, as §2.1.3 explicitly concedes, are fully consistent with the source being inactive during those epochs given its ~25% duty cycle. In addition, the 2021 MeerKAT spectra are flatter than the 2020 spectra, so the break is not established as a persistent property. Please provide a quantitative model comparison (e.g., an F-test or an information criterion) between the single power law and the broken power law using only the simultaneous 2020 MeerKAT in-band data, and state explicitly whether the break frequency is required by those data; otherwise, the quoted field strength should be presented as a conditional interpretation rather than a measured value.
  2. [§3.1, Eq. (1)] There is an internal inconsistency in the gyrofrequency used to derive B. The text states that the cutoff implies 'ν_c ≃ 1.5 GHz' and then quotes B = 0.36 kG, but Eq. (1) with B = 0.36 kG gives ν_c ≈ 1.0 GHz, which matches the fitted break frequencies of 1034–1070 MHz reported in §2.1.1. Using 1.5 GHz in Eq. (1) would instead give B ≈ 0.54 kG. Please correct this inconsistency and ensure that the quoted break frequency, the magnetic field strength, and Eq. (1) are mutually consistent.
  3. [§2.1.4, §3.4] The periodicity and stability evidence is weaker than the discussion in §3.4 implies. The 3.7-day Lomb-Scargle peak has a spectral window with a peak near 3.6 days, and the phase-folded clustering of S/N ≥ 4 detections is based on only six points; the paper itself cautions that the heterogeneous sampling precludes strong claims. Furthermore, the 2021 MeerKAT spectra are flatter than the 2020 spectra, and the 3 GHz detection is a single epoch, so the claimed constancy of spectral and polarization properties across epochs is not firmly established. Please either perform a window-function-aware significance test and report its result, or explicitly weaken the SPI/beamed-emission statements to match the strength of the current evidence.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1.1] There is a typo: 'Deccember 18' should read 'December 18'.
  2. [§2.1.4] The sentence 'these data can be fit by a simple sinusoidal (χ²_r = 1.9)' is followed by an incomplete phrase 'clustered in a phase interval 0.30.' Please specify the full phase range of the clustering.
  3. [Table 2] Several 2021 and 2024 entries report negative flux densities (e.g., 2021-10-04: −0.07 ± 0.05 mJy). These should be converted to upper limits or accompanied by a clarifying statement that negative values are noise rather than physical detections.
  4. [§2.3.3] The package name appears both as 'tess-phomo' and as 'tessphomo'; please unify the notation.
  5. [References] The entries 'Espinasse et al. 2025 in preparation' and 'Wilson et al. 2025 in preparation' are not verifiable as cited; please update them to published or publicly available versions, or remove them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the B=0.36 kG inference is a standard physical conversion of a measured spectral break, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained: it measures high brightness temperature, ~90% circular polarization, steep 1.5-GHz spectrum, hours-long activity, and a tentative 3.7-day periodicity from MeerKAT data, then interprets these as ECM signatures using external criteria (Güdel 2002; Zarka 1998). The magnetic-field estimate is obtained by fitting a broken power law to the 856-1712 MHz spectrum (break frequency 1034-1070 MHz) and converting the break to a gyrofrequency via the standard relation νc = 2.8 B (Eq. 1). This is a physical interpretation of a measured quantity, not a construction in which the output is defined in terms of the input. The paper explicitly acknowledges the low-frequency side of the break is not well constrained and that the non-simultaneous archival upper limits cannot exclude a duty-cycle-modulated variable source; those are data-limitation caveats, not circular steps. Self-citations to Frail et al. (2024) and Cotton et al. (2025) support the discovery and calibration, but the present analysis re-derives the radio properties and adds independent speckle, spectroscopic, and X-ray constraints, so no load-bearing claim reduces to a self-citation chain. The ULPT possibility is discussed and left open, again as honest uncertainty rather than circular reasoning. No equation or fitted parameter is renamed as an independent prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The M5.5 companion is an inferred stellar object from Gaia and speckle data, not a postulated entity. The free parameters listed are quantities fitted to the observed spectrum and light curve, which are normal measurements rather than ad hoc theory parameters. The main assumptions are standard physical relations (gyro-frequency, ECM signatures, Güdel-Benz relation) and the astrophysical association of the radio source with the star, which is well motivated but not absolutely certain.

free parameters (3)
  • Spectral break frequency ν_c = 1034-1070 MHz
    Fitted parameter in the broken power-law model of the 1.5 GHz spectrum (Section 2.1.1). Used to derive B=0.36 kG via Eq. 1. This is a measured property, not an ad hoc parameter, but it is a number fitted to data that the central ECM claim depends on.
  • High-frequency spectral index α = -5.53 to -5.84
    Fitted slope above the break in the 1.5 GHz spectrum. It is a key evidence for ECM-like steep spectrum, but the value varies slightly across epochs and the 2021 data may be flatter.
  • Duty cycle f = 25%
    Estimated by counting detections versus non-detections across heterogeneous radio observations (Section 2.1.4). Used in Table 7 for comparison, but not load-bearing for the ECM claim.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The gyro-frequency relation ν_c = 2.8 B MHz/G (Eq. 1)
    Used in Section 3.1 to convert the observed spectral break at ~1 GHz to B=0.36 kG.
  • domain assumption ECM emission produces high circular polarization, high brightness temperature, and a sharp spectral cutoff near the gyro-frequency
    Used throughout Section 3.1 to interpret the 1.5 GHz emission as ECM.
  • domain assumption The Güdel-Benz radio/X-ray luminosity relation applies as a baseline for chromospheric activity
    Used in Section 3.2 to argue that the radio luminosity is ~245 times too high for the low X-ray luminosity, ruling out chromospheric activity from the K star.
  • domain assumption Gaia astrometry, RUWE > 1.4, and the non-single-star solution indicate an unresolved companion
    Used in Section 2.3 to infer the existence of the M5.5 companion from the Gaia photocentric wobble and speckle contrast limits.
  • domain assumption The radio source is physically associated with HD317101A and lies at the Gaia distance of 33.84 pc
    Used throughout to convert flux densities to luminosities and to attribute the radio emission to the stellar system. Supported by positional coincidence but not absolutely proven.
  • ad hoc to paper The broken power-law model for the 1.5 GHz spectrum
    Chosen to describe the MeerKAT spectrum (Section 2.1.1); the low-frequency slope is 'not well constrained' and the turnover below 1 GHz is inferred from non-simultaneous archival limits.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Radio Flaring, Chromospherically-Inactive K Dwarf." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R5ACSZVA

@misc{pith2026250707255,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Radio Flaring, Chromospherically-Inactive K Dwarf},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R5ACSZVA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07255}
}
read the original abstract

We report on an unusual radio source J180526-292953, initially identified as a steep spectrum, polarized point source toward the Galactic bulge and found to coincide with the nearby K dwarf HD317101A. We conducted a multi-wavelength radio study utilizing new GMRT observations and archival data from ASKAP, MeerKAT, and the VLA. At 1.5 GHz, HD317101A exhibits highly polarized coherent emission with variable activity lasting several hours with an apparent period of 3.7 days, which is consistent with electron cyclotron maser (ECM) emission. The behavior at 3 GHz is distinctive, with a short burst lasting tens of seconds to minutes, a flat spectrum, and no detected polarization, possibly suggesting gyro-synchrotron emission. High-resolution optical spectroscopy from CHIRON/SMARTS confirms HD317101A as a mature, chromospherically inactive K7V star, while Gaia astrometry, combined with speckle imaging from Zorro/Gemini-S, indicates the presence of a close-in M5.5V companion. We evaluated three possible origins for the combined radio behavior: chromospheric activity, auroral emission (possibly from a star-planet interaction), or an ultra-long-period transient. The bulk of the evidence favors an auroral origin, but the dominant stellar source of the ECM emission remains uncertain. Future VLBI observations, long-term TESS monitoring, high resolution spectroscopy and further radio characterization will be key to distinguishing between various scenarios.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.07255 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top: Stokes RR light curve from 2020 June 28 using the lower half of the band centered at 1.022 GHz. Detections are shown as filled triangles; 3-σ upper limits are indicated by open triangles. The observing session spans 9 hours and consists of a single pointing with twelve 4.5-minute scans. Middle: Same as top, but for 2020 July 10. This 9 hour observing session includes four pointings, totaling 48 scans of 4.5 min… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An 8-year radio light curve of HD 317101A from the data in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A Lomb-Scargle periodogram of the 1.5-GHz radio measurements taken toward HD 317101A from 2019 to 2024. A peak with a period of 3.7 days is detected with a signal-to-noise of 7.3. The corresponding spectral window function for these data is also shown. Finally we searched for the same period using a light curve from a nearby (non-variable) continuum point source. We find no evidence of any periodicity at the same pe… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A phase-folded radio light curve at 1.5 GHz toward HD 317101A derived, using the best-fit Lomb-Scargle period P=3.72 days. The (light grey) shaded vertical regions are near show the clustering of our most significant detections (S/N≥4). These six points are indicated w…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: A compilation of stellar spectra for seven K dwarf stars (Bp − K between 2.0 and 4.0) across multiple age groups, focusing on a window around the Hα line at 6563 ˚A indicated by a filled in black arrow. Right: A compilation of the same set of spectra focusing on …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Speckle image and 5-σ contrast curves from the Zorro instrument on Gemini South. Blue camera (562 nm) and red camera (832 nm) curves are plotted. These curves show the magnitude difference (∆m) above which a field/companion star could be distinguished from the light of…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Normalized TESS light curve of the star HD 317101A (TIC 407888149) observed in sector 13. Four light curves are shown. From bottom to top these are (a) the SPOC 2-minute cadence, (b) the SPOC 30-minute cadence from the full frame images, and custom light curves extract…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Lomb-Scargle periodograms of four TESS light curves made toward the star HD 317101A (TIC 407888149). We argue that the periodicity around Prot ≃14 d is real and likely related to stellar rotation, while the peaks ∼5 d and ∼7 d are likely not real. The red curve shows a…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

165 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    l dY> M ;& ˆ #fΜ9a z| Ν۶m: >|رc /MZUaaa <:߻޶?X#惢СCWV=، 3z]޾n:u8| 3fYQxãG

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  5. [5]

    Audard , M., G \"u del , M., & Skinner , S. L. 2003, , 589, 983, 10.1086/374710

    doi:10.1086/374710 2003

  6. [6]

    C., Marcaide , J

    Azulay , R., Guirado , J. C., Marcaide , J. M., et al. 2017, , 607, A10, 10.1051/0004-6361/201730641

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730641 2017

  7. [7]

    C., Foster , R

    Backer , D. C., Foster , R. S., & Sallmen , S. 1993, , 365, 817, 10.1038/365817a0

    doi:10.1038/365817a0 1993

  8. [8]

    Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Rybizki , J., Fouesneau , M., Demleitner , M., & Andrae , R. 2021, , 161, 147, 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 2021

Show all 165 references
  1. [9]

    Baluev , R. V. 2008, , 385, 1279, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12689.x

    2008

  2. [10]

    J., Mason , P

    Barrett , P., Dieck , C., Beasley , A. J., Mason , P. A., & Singh , K. P. 2020, Advances in Space Research, 66, 1226, 10.1016/j.asr.2020.04.007

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    S., Cotton , W

    Bastian , T. S., Cotton , W. D., & Hallinan , G. 2022, , 935, 99, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7d57

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    S., Villadsen , J., Maps , A., Hallinan , G., & Beasley , A

    Bastian , T. S., Villadsen , J., Maps , A., Hallinan , G., & Beasley , A. J. 2018, , 857, 133, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab3cb

    2018 doi

  5. [13]

    2020, , 496, 1922, 10.1093/mnras/staa1522

    Belokurov , V., Penoyre , Z., Oh , S., et al. 2020, , 496, 1922, 10.1093/mnras/staa1522

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    O., & G \"u del , M

    Benz , A. O., & G \"u del , M. 1994, , 285, 621

    1994

  7. [15]

    2010, , 48, 241, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101757

    ---. 2010, , 48, 241, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101757

    2010 doi

  8. [16]

    R., Vedantham , H

    Bloot , S., Callingham , J. R., Vedantham , H. K., et al. 2024, , 682, A170, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348065

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    Bock , D. C. J., Large , M. I., & Sadler , E. M. 1999, , 117, 1578, 10.1086/300786

    1999 doi

  10. [18]

    M., Newton , E

    Boudreaux , E. M., Newton , E. R., Mondrik , N., Charbonneau , D., & Irwin , J. 2022, , 929, 80, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5cbf

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    E., Jardine , M

    Brasseur , C. E., Jardine , M. M., & Hussain , G. A. J. 2024, , 530, 2442, 10.1093/mnras/stae996

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    L., et al

    Caleb , M., Lenc , E., Kaplan , D. L., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 10.1038/s41550-024-02277-w

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    R., Vedantham , H

    Callingham , J. R., Vedantham , H. K., Shimwell , T. W., et al. 2021 a , Nature Astronomy, 5, 1233, 10.1038/s41550-021-01483-0

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    R., Pope , B

    Callingham , J. R., Pope , B. J. S., Feinstein , A. D., et al. 2021 b , , 648, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039144

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    R., Shimwell , T

    Callingham , J. R., Shimwell , T. W., Vedantham , H. K., et al. 2023, , 670, A124, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245567

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    R., Pope , B

    Callingham , J. R., Pope , B. J. S., Kavanagh , R. D., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1359, 10.1038/s41550-024-02405-6

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    2024, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Carrazco Gaxiola , S., Hubbard-James , H.-S., Henry , T., et al. 2024, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 243, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 259.05

    2024

  18. [26]

    2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    CASA Team , Bean , B., Bhatnagar , S., et al. 2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    R., et al

    Castro-Ginard , A., Penoyre , Z., Casey , A. R., et al. 2024, , 688, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450172

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    Cendes , Y., Williams , P. K. G., & Berger , E. 2022, , 163, 15, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac32c8

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    E., Kassim , N

    Clarke , T. E., Kassim , N. E., Brisken , W., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9906, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VI, ed. H. J. Hall , R. Gilmozzi , & H. K. Marshall , 99065B, 10.1117/12.2233036

    2016 doi

  22. [30]

    R., van Saders , J

    Claytor , Z. R., van Saders , J. L., Cao , L., et al. 2024, , 962, 47, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad159a

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    J., Cotton , W

    Condon , J. J., Cotton , W. D., Greisen , E. W., et al. 1998, , 115, 1693, 10.1086/300337

    1998 doi

  24. [32]

    D., Agnihotri , P

    Cotton , W. D., Agnihotri , P. J., Camilo , F., Polisensky , E., & Hyman , S. D. 2025, , 985, 94, 10.3847/1538-4357/adcc33

    2025 doi

  25. [33]

    Cuntz , M., & Guinan , E. F. 2016, , 827, 79, 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/79

    2016 doi

  26. [34]

    Das , B., Chandra , P., & Wade , G. A. 2018, , 474, L61, 10.1093/mnrasl/slx193

    2018 doi

  27. [35]

    M., Bassa , C

    de Ruiter , I., Rajwade , K. M., Bassa , C. G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.11536, 10.48550/arXiv.2408.11536

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    C., Srivastava , A

    Didel , S., Pandey , J. C., Srivastava , A. K., & Singh , G. 2024, , 527, 1705, 10.1093/mnras/stad3245

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    S., et al

    Dobie , D., Zic , A., Oswald , L. S., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.12352, 10.48550/arXiv.2406.12352

    2024 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    F., Collier Cameron , A., Hussain , G

    Donati , J. F., Collier Cameron , A., Hussain , G. A. J., & Semel , M. 1999, , 302, 437, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02095.x

    1999

  31. [39]

    A., Clarke , T., Curtin , A

    Dong , F. A., Clarke , T., Curtin , A. P., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.07480, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.07480

    2024 doi arXiv

  32. [40]

    N., Heald , G., Duchesne , S

    Driessen , L. N., Heald , G., Duchesne , S. W., et al. 2023, , 40, e036, 10.1017/pasa.2023.26

    2023 doi

  33. [41]

    N., Pritchard , J., Murphy , T., et al

    Driessen , L. N., Pritchard , J., Murphy , T., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.07418, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.07418

    2024 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    W., Thomson , A

    Duchesne , S. W., Thomson , A. J. M., Pritchard , J., et al. 2023, , 40, e034, 10.1017/pasa.2023.31

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    W., Ross , K., Thomson , A

    Duchesne , S. W., Ross , K., Thomson , A. J. M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.04978, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.04978

    2025 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    Dulk , G. A. 1985, , 23, 169, 10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001125

    1985

  37. [45]

    Eason , E. L. E., Giampapa , M. S., Radick , R. R., Worden , S. P., & Hege , E. K. 1992, , 104, 1161, 10.1086/116305

    1992 doi

  38. [46]

    2024, , 98, 101694, 10.1016/j.newar.2024.101694

    El-Badry , K. 2024, , 98, 101694, 10.1016/j.newar.2024.101694

    2024

  39. [47]

    2021, The Astronomer's Telegram, 14607, 1

    Espinasse , M., Carotenuto , F., Tremou , E., et al. 2021, The Astronomer's Telegram, 14607, 1

    2021

  40. [48]

    2025 in preparation,

    Espinasse et al., . 2025 in preparation,

    2025

  41. [49]

    N., Primini , F

    Evans , I. N., Primini , F. A., Glotfelty , K. J., et al. 2010, , 189, 37, 10.1088/0067-0049/189/1/37

    2010 doi

  42. [50]

    A., Corbel , S., et al

    Fender , R., Woudt , P. A., Corbel , S., et al. 2016, in MeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA, 13, 10.22323/1.277.0013

    2016 doi

  43. [51]

    2022, , 516, 2074, 10.1093/mnras/stac1868

    Feng , Y., Zhao , X., Li , Y., et al. 2022, , 516, 2074, 10.1093/mnras/stac1868

    2022 doi

  44. [52]

    A., Polisensky , E., Hyman , S

    Frail , D. A., Polisensky , E., Hyman , S. D., et al. 2024, , 975, 34, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad74fd

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    E., Malo , L., et al

    Gagn \'e , J., Mamajek , E. E., Malo , L., et al. 2018, , 856, 23, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaae09

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2021, , 649, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657

    2021 doi

  47. [55]

    1992, , 264, L31

    Gudel , M. 1992, , 264, L31

    1992

  48. [56]

    2002, , 40, 217, 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093806

    G \"u del , M. 2002, , 40, 217, 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093806

    2002

  49. [57]

    2004, , 12, 71, 10.1007/s00159-004-0023-2

    ---. 2004, , 12, 71, 10.1007/s00159-004-0023-2

    2004 doi

  50. [58]

    N., Zhan , Z., Seager , S., et al

    G \"u nther , M. N., Zhan , Z., Seager , S., et al. 2020, , 159, 60, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab5d3a

    2020 doi

  51. [59]

    2023, , 674, A9, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243969

    Halbwachs , J.-L., Pourbaix , D., Arenou , F., et al. 2023, , 674, A9, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243969

    2023 doi

  52. [60]

    L., McConnell , D., Thomson , A

    Hale , C. L., McConnell , D., Thomson , A. J. M., et al. 2021, , 38, e058, 10.1017/pasa.2021.47

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    G., et al

    Hallinan , G., Antonova , A., Doyle , J. G., et al. 2006, , 653, 690, 10.1086/508678

    2006 doi

  54. [62]

    2008, , 684, 644, 10.1086/590360

    ---. 2008, , 684, 644, 10.1086/590360

    2008 doi

  55. [63]

    P., Cotter , G., et al

    Hallinan , G., Littlefair , S. P., Cotter , G., et al. 2015, , 523, 568, 10.1038/nature14619

    2015 doi

  56. [64]

    2022, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Henry , T., Casetti-Dinescu , D., Horch , E., et al. 2022, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 240, American Astronomical Society Meeting \#240, 305.15

    2022

  57. [65]

    J., & Jao , W.-C

    Henry , T. J., & Jao , W.-C. 2024, , 62, 593, 10.1146/annurev-astro-052722-102740

    2024 doi

  58. [66]

    Hess , S. L. G., & Zarka , P. 2011, , 531, A29, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116510

    2011 doi

  59. [67]

    J., Mulders , G

    Hippke , M., David , T. J., Mulders , G. D., & Heller , R. 2019, , 158, 143, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab3984

    2019 doi

  60. [68]

    2019, , 623, A39, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834672

    Hippke , M., & Heller , R. 2019, , 623, A39, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834672

    2019 doi

  61. [69]

    B., Everett , M

    Howell , S. B., Everett , M. E., Sherry , W., Horch , E., & Ciardi , D. R. 2011, , 142, 19, 10.1088/0004-6256/142/1/19

    2011 doi

  62. [70]

    B., & Furlan , E

    Howell , S. B., & Furlan , E. 2022, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 871163, 10.3389/fspas.2022.871163

    2022

  63. [71]

    2024, in IAU General Assembly, 2962

    Hubbard-James , H.-S., Gaxiola , S., Henry , T., et al. 2024, in IAU General Assembly, 2962

    2024

  64. [72]

    X., Henry , T

    Hubbard-James , H.-S., Lesley , D. X., Henry , T. J., Paredes , L. A., & Nisak , A. H. 2022, , 164, 174, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac8d6a

    2022 doi

  65. [73]

    V., Perkins , S., Merry , B., Mauch , T., & Smirnov , O

    Hugo , B. V., Perkins , S., Merry , B., Mauch , T., & Smirnov , O. M. 2022, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 532, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, ed. J. E. Ruiz , F. Pierfedereci , & P. Teuben , 541. 2206.09179

    2022 arXiv

  66. [74]

    R., Hancock , P

    Hurley-Walker , N., Callingham , J. R., Hancock , P. J., et al. 2017, , 464, 1146, 10.1093/mnras/stw2337

    2017 doi

  67. [75]

    2022, , 601, 526, 10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x

    Hurley-Walker , N., Zhang , X., Bahramian , A., et al. 2022, , 601, 526, 10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x

    2022 doi

  68. [76]

    J., et al

    Hurley-Walker , N., Rea , N., McSweeney , S. J., et al. 2023, , 619, 487, 10.1038/s41586-023-06202-5

    2023 doi

  69. [77]

    J., Bahramian , A., et al

    Hurley-Walker , N., McSweeney , S. J., Bahramian , A., et al. 2024, , 976, L21, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad890e

    2024 doi

  70. [78]

    D., Lazio , T

    Hyman , S. D., Lazio , T. J. W., Kassim , N. E., & Bartleson , A. L. 2002, , 123, 1497, 10.1086/338905

    2002 doi

  71. [79]

    D., Lazio , T

    Hyman , S. D., Lazio , T. J. W., Kassim , N. E., et al. 2005, , 434, 50, 10.1038/nature03400

    2005 doi

  72. [80]

    D., Roy , S., Pal , S., et al

    Hyman , S. D., Roy , S., Pal , S., et al. 2007, , 660, L121, 10.1086/518245

    2007 doi

  73. [81]

    D., Wijnands , R., Lazio , T

    Hyman , S. D., Wijnands , R., Lazio , T. J. W., et al. 2009, , 696, 280, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/280

    2009 doi

  74. [82]

    T., Jagannathan , P., Mooley , K

    Intema , H. T., Jagannathan , P., Mooley , K. P., & Frail , D. A. 2017, , 598, A78, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628536

    2017 doi

  75. [83]

    T., van der Tol , S., Cotton , W

    Intema , H. T., van der Tol , S., Cotton , W. D., et al. 2009, , 501, 1185, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811094

    2009 doi

  76. [84]

    J., White , R

    Jao , W.-C., Henry , T. J., White , R. J., et al. 2023, , 166, 63, 10.3847/1538-3881/ace2bb

    2023 doi

  77. [85]

    P., Bartel , M., & G \"u del , M

    Johnstone , C. P., Bartel , M., & G \"u del , M. 2021, , 649, A96, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038407

    2021 doi

  78. [86]

    M., Hallinan , G., Pineda , J

    Kao , M. M., Hallinan , G., Pineda , J. S., Stevenson , D., & Burgasser , A. 2018, , 237, 25, 10.3847/1538-4365/aac2d5

    2018 doi

  79. [87]

    M., Mioduszewski , A

    Kao , M. M., Mioduszewski , A. J., Villadsen , J., & Shkolnik , E. L. 2023, , 619, 272, 10.1038/s41586-023-06138-w

    2023 doi

  80. [88]

    M., & Pineda , J

    Kao , M. M., & Pineda , J. S. 2022, , 932, 21, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac660b

    2022 doi

  81. [89]

    2024, , 10.1093/mnras/stae905

    ---. 2024, , 10.1093/mnras/stae905

    2024 doi

  82. [90]

    V., Zyuzin , D

    Karpova , A. V., Zyuzin , D. A., Shibanov , Y. A., & Gilfanov , M. R. 2023, , 524, 3020, 10.1093/mnras/stad1992

    2023 doi

  83. [91]

    D., & Vedantham , H

    Kavanagh , R. D., & Vedantham , H. K. 2023, , 524, 6267, 10.1093/mnras/stad2035

    2023 doi

  84. [92]

    D., Vidotto , A

    Kavanagh , R. D., Vidotto , A. A., Klein , B., et al. 2021, , 504, 1511, 10.1093/mnras/stab929

    2021 doi

  85. [93]

    S., Smirnov , O

    Kenyon , J. S., Smirnov , O. M., Grobler , T. L., & Perkins , S. J. 2018, , 478, 2399, 10.1093/mnras/sty1221

    2018 doi

  86. [94]

    2022, , 657, A7, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142146

    Kervella , P., Arenou , F., & Th \'e venin , F. 2022, , 657, A7, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142146

    2022 doi

  87. [95]

    D., Henry , T

    Kirkpatrick , J. D., Henry , T. J., & Irwin , M. J. 1997, , 113, 1421, 10.1086/118357

    1997 doi

  88. [96]

    2021, , 29, 1, 10.1007/s00159-020-00130-3

    Kochukhov , O. 2021, , 29, 1, 10.1007/s00159-020-00130-3

    2021 doi

  89. [97]

    J., et al

    Kordopatis , G., Schultheis , M., McMillan , P. J., et al. 2023, , 669, A104, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244283

    2023 doi

  90. [98]

    Kowalski , A. F. 2024, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 21, 1, 10.1007/s41116-024-00039-4

    2024 doi

  91. [99]

    A., Chandler , C

    Lacy , M., Baum , S. A., Chandler , C. J., et al. 2020, , 132, 035001, 10.1088/1538-3873/ab63eb

    2020 doi

  92. [100]

    Lalitha , S., & Schmitt , J. H. M. M. 2013, , 559, A119, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321723

    2013 doi

  93. [101]

    Lazio , T. J. W. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.12348, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.12348

    2024 doi arXiv

  94. [102]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.15739, 10.48550/arXiv.2411.15739

    Li , D., Yuan , M., Wu , L., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.15739, 10.48550/arXiv.2411.15739

    2024 doi

  95. [103]

    M., Nelson , G

    Lim , J., White , S. M., Nelson , G. J., & Benz , A. O. 1994, , 430, 332, 10.1086/174408

    1994 doi

  96. [104]

    L., & Gary , D

    Linsky , J. L., & Gary , D. E. 1983, , 274, 776, 10.1086/161490

    1983 doi

  97. [105]

    L., & Potter , D

    Luhman , K. L., & Potter , D. 2006, , 638, 887, 10.1086/499096

    2006 doi

  98. [106]

    2023, , 166, 265, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad0727

    Mart \' nez-Palomera , J., Hedges , C., & Dotson , J. 2023, , 166, 265, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad0727

    2023 doi

  99. [107]

    A., et al

    Mata S \'a nchez , D., Mu \ n oz-Darias , T., C \'u neo , V. A., et al. 2022, , 926, L10, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac502f

    2022 doi

  100. [108]

    Matthews , L. D. 2019, , 131, 016001, 10.1088/1538-3873/aae856

    2019 doi

  101. [109]

    B., & Dulk , G

    Melrose , D. B., & Dulk , G. A. 1982, , 259, 844, 10.1086/160219

    1982 doi

  102. [110]

    L., Stewart , A

    Murphy , T., Kaplan , D. L., Stewart , A. J., et al. 2021, , 38, e054, 10.1017/pasa.2021.44

    2021 doi

  103. [111]

    L., Lestrade , J

    Mutel , R. L., Lestrade , J. F., Preston , R. A., & Phillips , R. B. 1985, , 289, 262, 10.1086/162886

    1985 doi

  104. [112]

    L., Morris , D

    Mutel , R. L., Morris , D. H., Doiron , D. J., & Lestrade , J. F. 1987, , 93, 1220, 10.1086/114402

    1987 doi

  105. [113]

    B., Gizon , L., Schunker , H., & Karoff , C

    Nielsen , M. B., Gizon , L., Schunker , H., & Karoff , C. 2013, , 557, L10, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321912

    2013 doi

  106. [114]

    R., McKinley , B., Hurley-Walker , N., et al

    Offringa , A. R., McKinley , B., Hurley-Walker , N., et al. 2014, , 444, 606, 10.1093/mnras/stu1368

    2014 doi

  107. [115]

    A., Henry , T

    Paredes , L. A., Henry , T. J., Quinn , S. N., et al. 2021, , 162, 176, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac082a

    2021 doi

  108. [117]

    2013 b , , 208, 9, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9

    ---. 2013 b , , 208, 9, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9

    2013 doi

  109. [118]

    S., Hallinan , G., & Kao , M

    Pineda , J. S., Hallinan , G., & Kao , M. M. 2017, , 846, 75, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8596

    2017 doi

  110. [119]

    S., & Villadsen , J

    Pineda , J. S., & Villadsen , J. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 569, 10.1038/s41550-023-01914-0

    2023 doi

  111. [120]

    2024, , 970, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4356

    Plant , K., Hallinan , G., & Bastian , T. 2024, , 970, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4356

    2024 doi

  112. [121]

    Pope , B. J. S., Callingham , J. R., Feinstein , A. D., et al. 2021, , 919, L10, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac230c

    2021 doi

  113. [122]

    P., Rosen , S., Fyfe , D., & Schr \"o der , A

    Pye , J. P., Rosen , S., Fyfe , D., & Schr \"o der , A. C. 2015, , 581, A28, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526217

    2015 doi

  114. [123]

    Rauscher , E., & Marcy , G. W. 2006, , 118, 617, 10.1086/503021

    2006 doi

  115. [124]

    Readhead , A. C. S. 1994, , 426, 51, 10.1086/174038

    1994 doi

  116. [125]

    2012, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 9, 1, 10.12942/lrsp-2012-1

    Reiners , A. 2012, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 9, 1, 10.12942/lrsp-2012-1

    2012 doi

  117. [126]

    L., Loyd , R

    Richey-Yowell , T., Shkolnik , E. L., Loyd , R. O. P., et al. 2022, , 929, 169, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f48

    2022 doi

  118. [127]

    R., Winn , J

    Ricker , G. R., Winn , J. N., Vanderspek , R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003, 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003

    2015 doi

  119. [128]

    E., Hughes , A

    Ridder , M. E., Hughes , A. K., Heinke , C. O., Sivakoff , G. R., & Sydora , R. D. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.24157, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.24157

    2024 doi arXiv

  120. [129]

    Rodriguez , A. C. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.03315, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.03315

    2025 doi arXiv

  121. [130]

    D., Pal , S., et al

    Roy , S., Hyman , S. D., Pal , S., et al. 2010, , 712, L5, 10.1088/2041-8205/712/1/L5

    2010 doi

  122. [131]

    A., et al

    Sayeed , M., Angus , R., Berger , T. A., et al. 2025, , 169, 112, 10.3847/1538-3881/ada8a1

    2025 doi

  123. [132]

    Scaife , A. M. M., & Heald , G. H. 2012, , 423, L30, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01251.x

    2012

  124. [133]

    Schmitt , J. H. M. M., Kanbach , G., Rau , A., & Steinle , H. 2016, , 589, A48, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628199

    2016 doi

  125. [134]

    Schmitt , J. H. M. M., & Liefke , C. 2004, , 417, 651, 10.1051/0004-6361:20030495

    2004 doi

  126. [135]

    J., Howell , S

    Scott , N. J., Howell , S. B., Gnilka , C. L., et al. 2021, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 8, 138, 10.3389/fspas.2021.716560

    2021

  127. [136]

    Singh , G., & Pandey , J. C. 2024, , 966, 86, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2f2e

    2024 doi

  128. [137]

    F., Cutri , R

    Skrutskie , M. F., Cutri , R. M., Stiening , R., et al. 2006, , 131, 1163, 10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  129. [138]

    G., Oelkers , R

    Stassun , K. G., Oelkers , R. J., Paegert , M., et al. 2019, , 158, 138, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab3467

    2019 doi

  130. [139]

    2019 a , TESS Light Curves: Sector 13, STScI/MAST, 10.17909/HZQ3-6S38

    STScI . 2019 a , TESS Light Curves: Sector 13, STScI/MAST, 10.17909/HZQ3-6S38

    2019 doi

  131. [140]

    2019 b , TESS Calibrated Full Frame Images: Sector 13, STScI/MAST, 10.17909/F2T0-D696

    ---. 2019 b , TESS Calibrated Full Frame Images: Sector 13, STScI/MAST, 10.17909/F2T0-D696

    2019 doi

  132. [141]

    C., Smith , J

    Stumpe , M. C., Smith , J. C., Catanzarite , J. H., et al. 2014, , 126, 100, 10.1086/674989

    2014 doi

  133. [142]

    E., Arzoumanian , Z., & Taylor , J

    Thorsett , S. E., Arzoumanian , Z., & Taylor , J. H. 1993, , 412, L33, 10.1086/186933

    1993 doi

  134. [143]

    Toet , S. E. B., Vedantham , H. K., Callingham , J. R., et al. 2021, , 654, A21, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141163

    2021 doi

  135. [144]

    2023, , 165, 180, 10.3847/1538-3881/acc464

    Tokovinin , A. 2023, , 165, 180, 10.3847/1538-3881/acc464

    2023 doi

  136. [145]

    A., Bonati , M., et al

    Tokovinin , A., Fischer , D. A., Bonati , M., et al. 2013, , 125, 1336, 10.1086/674012

    2013 doi

  137. [146]

    1975, , 13, 295, 10.1146/annurev.aa.13.090175.001455

    van de Kamp , P. 1975, , 13, 295, 10.1146/annurev.aa.13.090175.001455

    1975

  138. [147]

    K., Callingham , J

    Vedantham , H. K., Callingham , J. R., Shimwell , T. W., et al. 2022, , 926, L30, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5115

    2022 doi

  139. [148]

    2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 577, 10.1038/s41550-020-1011-9

    ---. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 577, 10.1038/s41550-020-1011-9

    2020 doi

  140. [149]

    A., Gregory , S

    Vidotto , A. A., Gregory , S. G., Jardine , M., et al. 2014, , 441, 2361, 10.1093/mnras/stu728

    2014 doi

  141. [150]

    2019, , 871, 214, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf88e

    Villadsen , J., & Hallinan , G. 2019, , 871, 214, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf88e

    2019 doi

  142. [151]

    L., Murphy , T., et al

    Wang , Z., Kaplan , D. L., Murphy , T., et al. 2021, , 920, 45, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2360

    2021 doi

  143. [152]

    A., Coriat , M., Traulsen , I., et al

    Webb , N. A., Coriat , M., Traulsen , I., et al. 2020, , 641, A136, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937353

    2020 doi

  144. [153]

    Williams , P. K. G., Cook , B. A., & Berger , E. 2014, , 785, 9, 10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/9

    2014 doi

  145. [154]

    2025 in preparation,

    Wilson et al., . 2025 in preparation,

    2025

  146. [155]

    Wolszczan , A., & Frail , D. A. 1992, , 355, 145, 10.1038/355145a0

    1992 doi

  147. [156]

    J., Drake , J

    Wright , N. J., Drake , J. J., Mamajek , E. E., & Henry , G. W. 2011, , 743, 48, 10.1088/0004-637X/743/1/48

    2011 doi

  148. [157]

    J., Newton , E

    Wright , N. J., Newton , E. R., Williams , P. K. G., Drake , J. J., & Yadav , R. K. 2018, , 479, 2351, 10.1093/mnras/sty1670

    2018 doi

  149. [158]

    S., & Lee , L

    Wu , C. S., & Lee , L. C. 1979, , 230, 621, 10.1086/157120

    1979 doi

  150. [159]

    W., Petigura , E

    Yee , S. W., Petigura , E. A., & von Braun , K. 2017, , 836, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/77

    2017 doi

  151. [160]

    Yiu , T. W. H., Vedantham , H. K., Callingham , J. R., & G \"u nther , M. N. 2024, , 684, A3, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347657

    2024 doi

  152. [161]

    2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 50, 10.1038/s41550-023-02122-6

    Yu , S., Chen , B., Sharma , R., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 50, 10.1038/s41550-023-02122-6

    2024 doi

  153. [162]

    1998, , 103, 20159, 10.1029/98JE01323

    Zarka , P. 1998, , 103, 20159, 10.1029/98JE01323

    1998 doi

  154. [163]

    2007, , 55, 598, 10.1016/j.pss.2006.05.045

    ---. 2007, , 55, 598, 10.1016/j.pss.2006.05.045

    2007 doi

  155. [164]

    2024, , 531, 919, 10.1093/mnras/stae1131

    Zhang , X., Li , J., Gao , Y., & Qian , L. 2024, , 531, 919, 10.1093/mnras/stae1131

    2024 doi

  156. [165]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.07313, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.07313

    Zhu , E., & Preibisch , T. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.07313, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.07313

    2025 doi arXiv

  157. [166]

    2019, , 488, 559, 10.1093/mnras/stz1684

    Zic , A., Stewart , A., Lenc , E., et al. 2019, , 488, 559, 10.1093/mnras/stz1684

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.