Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

BASS XLVIII: [Ne v] {\lambda}3427 Emission in Powerful Nearby Active Galactic Nuclei

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that the narrow [Ne v] $\lambda3427$ line, detected in 43% of a complete ultra-hard-X-ray-selected AGN sample, calibrates accretion power with median $\log(L_{\rm [Ne\,v]}/L_{14-150}) = -3.75$ and about 0.45 dex scatter…

desk verdict A careful, well-scoped calibration of [Ne v] lambda3427 as a tracer of obscured AGN power; the null trends hold up and the main caveat is quantified, not fatal. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08179 v1 pith:46K7ZXDB submitted 2025-07-10 astro-ph.GA

Tomer Reiss , Benny Trakhtenbrot , Claudio Ricci , Franz E. Bauer , Michael J. Koss , Kohei Ichikawa , Darshan Kakkad , Richard Mushotzky
show 9 more authors
Kyuseok Oh Alessandro Peca Rudolf Bär Yaherlyn Diaz Fiona Harrison Meredith C. Powell Eleonora Sani Daniel Stern C. Megan Urry
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords activegalacticnuclei[Nev]lambda3427ultra-hardX-rayselectionobscuredAGNemission-linediagnosticsblackholemassEddingtonratiospectralstacking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the narrow [Ne v] $\lambda3427$ emission line, a spectral signature of gas ionized by photons with energies above 97 eV and essentially only produced by accreting supermassive black holes, can serve as a reliable measure of how hard an active galactic nucleus (AGN) is accreting. Using 341 narrow-line AGN selected by their ultra-hard X-rays (14-195 keV), it reports that the line is detected in 43% of the sample, and that detection is achieved even among the most heavily obscured systems. The median ratio of [Ne v] luminosity to intrinsic 14-150 keV X-ray luminosity is $\log(L_{\rm [Ne\,v]}/L_{14-150}) = -3.75$, with a scatter of about 0.45 dex, comparable to or smaller than the scatter of the commonly used [O III] $\lambda5007$ tracer. Neither the detection fraction nor the relative line strength shows a significant trend with X-ray luminosity, black-hole mass, Eddington ratio, or line-of-sight column density. If the claim holds, [Ne v] becomes a calibrated, nearly star-formation-free probe of accretion power in hidden AGN, including dual and high-redshift sources.

What carries the argument

The central object is the narrow [Ne v] $\lambda3427$ emission line, a coronal line requiring ionizing photons with $h\nu > 97$ eV, which in practice are produced almost exclusively by the AGN accretion flow rather than by star formation. The argument is carried by measuring this line in 341 narrow-line AGN selected through their ultra-hard X-ray emission, using Gaussian fits to individual VLT/X-Shooter and Palomar/DBSP spectra plus continuum-normalized stacks in bins of luminosity, black-hole mass, Eddington ratio, and column density. The key quantitative machinery is the luminosity ratio $L_{\rm [Ne\,v]}/L_{14-150}$ and its distribution: a median of $-3.75$ dex with ~0.45 dex scatter, which is what converts a line flux into an accretion-power estimate and what sets the claim that [Ne v] works as a tracer.

What would settle it

Measure, for each of the 341 AGN, a host-scale dust indicator such as the Balmer decrement or the ratio of [Ne v] $\lambda3427$ to the dust-insensitive mid-infrared [Ne v] 14.3 $\mu$m line; if $F_{\rm [Ne\,v]}/F_{14-150}$ declines systematically with increasing host $E(B-V)$, especially among high-column sources, the reported null trends and the high detection fraction at $\log N_{\rm H} \gtrsim 23$ would be partly artifacts of attenuation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that narrow [Ne v] $\lambda3427$ emission is a reliable tracer of intrinsic AGN radiative output across the full range of obscuration, not a line that only appears in unobscured or low-column systems. The paper's dedicated fits and stacking of 341 ultra-hard-X-ray-selected, narrow-line AGN yield a detection fraction $f_{\rm det} = 42.8\%$ (146/341), which saturates near ~75% even at extremely high signal-to-noise rather than reaching 100%, so the absence of [Ne v] in an individual spectrum does not mean the AGN is weak. Among detections, the median scaling is $\log(L_{\rm [Ne\,v]}/L_{14-150}) = -3.75$ with 0.45 dex standard deviation (and $-3.36$ relative to 2-10 keV), and the relative strength shows no significant correlation with $L_{14-150}$ (except a weak sub-linear luminosity dependence), $M_{\rm BH}$, Eddington ratio, or $N_{\rm H}$, with the detection fraction remaining above ~60% at $\log(N_{\rm H}/{\rm cm^{-2}}) \gtrsim 23$. Stacking spectra of individually non-detected AGN fails to produce [Ne v] in most bins and shows no clear trend with any property. The authors conclude that [Ne v] can be used as-is to estimate AGN bolometric luminosity ($L_{\rm bol} \approx 45{,}000 \times L_{\rm [Ne\,v]}$) and to identify obscured and dual AGN, including at high redshift with JWST.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that dust in the host galaxy does not dim the [Ne v] line more for some AGN than for others in a way that tracks the same properties being studied, because no correction for host-galaxy extinction is applied.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • [Ne v] $\lambda3427$ can be used to estimate AGN bolometric luminosity through $L_{\rm bol} \approx 45{,}000 \times L_{\rm [Ne\,v]}$, with scatter comparable to or below that of [O III] $\lambda5007$ at ~0.5 dex.
  • The line remains detectable in a large fraction of Compton-thick and heavily obscured AGN, so it can flag buried accretion that X-ray surveys miss.
  • For $z \gtrsim 6$ sources observed with JWST/NIRSpec, a detected [Ne v] line directly implies AGN-powered ionization, and the measured scaling converts line flux into an accretion-power estimate.
  • The absence of strong trends with black-hole mass and Eddington ratio means simple thin-disk predictions, that high-mass or low-$\lambda_{\rm Edd}$ flows should produce little extreme-UV radiation, are not reflected in the relative strength of [Ne v] emission.
  • Narrow-band [Ne v] imaging can reveal sub-kpc dual AGN in obscured mergers, where [O III] is contaminated by star formation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If host-scale dust is later found to dim [Ne v] more in certain merging or high-column hosts, the apparent independence from $N_{\rm H}$ and the detection fraction at high obscuration could be partly artifacts; the paper itself flags this as its main caveat.
  • Because the line is almost immune to star-formation contamination, the measured scaling could be applied to large optical surveys to estimate obscured accretion luminosity even without X-ray data, provided the signal-to-noise-dependent detection fraction is modeled.
  • The saturation of the detection fraction near 75% at high $S/N$ suggests an intrinsic spread in narrow-line-region properties, so stacking non-detections is a promising route to recover average line strength for faint populations.
  • A direct comparison of [Ne v] $\lambda3427$ with the dust-unaffected mid-infrared [Ne v] lines on the same objects would test whether the null trends with $N_{\rm H}$ are real or an attenuation artifact.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper measures the narrow [Ne V] λ3427 emission line in 341 ultra-hard X-ray (14-195 keV) selected, narrow-line AGN from the BASS survey, using individual fits and spectral stacking. It reports a detection fraction of 42.8% (146/341), a median ratio log L[NeV]/L(14-150 keV) = -3.75 with ~0.45 dex scatter, and finds no strong trends of detection rate or relative line strength with X-ray luminosity, black hole mass, Eddington ratio, or column density, except for a weak anti-correlation with L(14-150). The paper concludes that [Ne V] λ3427 is a robust AGN accretion tracer even in heavily obscured systems, and discusses implications for high-redshift JWST studies and dual AGN searches.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a valuable calibration of an AGN tracer that can penetrate heavy obscuration and is accessible with JWST at high redshift. The analysis is careful in several respects: Monte-Carlo-based uncertainties, conservative multi-criteria detection thresholds, explicit correlation tests including upper limits (Kendall τ), a stacking analysis, and comparison with the dust-insensitive MIR [Ne V] lines from the companion BASS study (Bierschenk et al. 2024). The concordance between the optical and MIR [Ne V] results is a strong argument that the null trends are not primarily artifacts of host-galaxy dust. The sample is homogeneous in selection (ultra-hard X-rays) and the paper appropriately restricts its conclusions to narrow-line AGN.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §4.3; Table 2 (Appendix C)] The abstract states that "we find no significant relations between the (relative) strength of [Ne V] and the basic AGN/SMBH properties under study," but Table 2 reports a statistically significant anti-correlation between log(F[Nev]/F14-150) and log L14-150 (Spearman ρ=-0.34, P=3.1e-5; Kendall τ=-0.11, P=0.008). The body of the paper correctly identifies this as the only statistically significant relation, but the abstract's blanket claim is too strong. Please soften the abstract to "no strong trends" or explicitly state the exception, otherwise readers will incorrectly infer that no correlation with X-ray luminosity exists.
  2. [§3.2 vs. §4.4] There is a direct contradiction about which spectra enter the stacking analysis. §3.2 says that stacks were constructed from either all AGN or only non-detected AGN, and that §4.4 focuses on the "former set" (all AGN). §4.4 then says "These stacked spectra, and the analysis that follows, focus only on those AGN where [Ne V] was not individually detected." This inconsistency makes it impossible to interpret Figure 8 and Table 1 precisely. Please correct the text and specify in the figure/table caption which subset is shown.
  3. [§4.2; Eq. (1); §5] The scaling ratios (median log L[NeV]/L14-150 = -3.75, scatter 0.45 dex) and the linear fit in Eq. (1) are derived exclusively from the 146 [Ne V]-detected sources, while 195 sources (57% of the sample) provide only upper limits. As the paper itself cautions, the intrinsic scatter is larger, but the median itself may also be biased if non-detections preferentially have lower L[NeV]/L_X. A quantitative treatment of the censoring (e.g., a Kaplan-Meier or survival-regression estimate of the median ratio, or at least a bound on the bias) is needed to support the use of these values as a calibration. Absent such an analysis, the paper should explicitly state that the reported ratios apply only to sources in which [Ne V] is detected, not to the full AGN population.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract; §4.1; §4.3] The detection fraction at high column density is quoted inconsistently: the abstract says ">70% for log[N_H/cm^-2] > 23", §4.1 says "f_det ≈ 60%" at log(N_H/cm^-2) ≳ 23, and §4.3 says "exceeding f_det ≈ 50%" at ≳23.5 and "reaching f_det ≳ 80%" toward >24. Please harmonize the numbers and specify the exact bin edges.
  2. [§4.2] The statement that the [Ne V] scatter (0.45 dex) is "smaller than" the [O III] scatter is based on comparisons with different samples and fitting procedures (Heckman et al. 2005; Berney et al. 2015). The qualitative conclusion that the scatter is comparable is well supported, but the quantitative claim of being "smaller" should be caveated accordingly.
  3. [§4.5] The host-dust discussion is well done, but the paper could strengthen it by testing sensitivity to host extinction using available Balmer-decrement measurements (or excluding known edge-on/merger hosts) rather than only a foreground-screen estimate. This would further diminish the concern that the null trends are dust-induced.
  4. [Figure 2; §4.1] The text says the detection fraction "saturates near f_det ≃ 75% at S/N ≳ 30", but the plotted bins in Figure 2 reach at most 69% (11/16). Please adjust the wording to match the actual binned values.
  5. [Throughout] Minor language issues: §2.1 "the line is very close to the noisy, blue end" could be rephrased; §4.4 contains "arrow [Nev]" which appears to be a typo for "[Nev]"; also the phrase "we adopt a the aforementioned criteria" in §3.2 should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: [Ne v] fluxes, X-ray luminosities, and SMBH properties are independent empirical inputs, and the scaling relations are presented as calibrations rather than derived predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are empirical measurements, not derivations that assume their own conclusions. The [Ne v] lambda3427 fluxes are measured from X-Shooter and DBSP spectra through independent Gaussian fits with Monte Carlo uncertainties (Section 3.1), while L14-150, L2-10, N_H, M_BH, and lambda_Edd come from separate BASS/DR2 data products (Ricci et al. 2017b; Koss et al. 2022b; Koss et al. 2022c). The median scaling log L[NeV]/L14-150 = -3.75 with 0.45 dex scatter is a measured ratio between two independently determined quantities; it is not a fitted parameter that is then relabeled as a prediction. The claimed absence of trends with L14-150, M_BH, lambda_Edd, and N_H is established through Spearman, Pearson, and Kendall correlation tests reported in Appendix C, Table 2, which explicitly test for correlations rather than assume them. The only statistically significant trend, the mild anti-correlation between F[NeV]/F14-150 and L14-150, is acknowledged and explained as echoing the sub-linear L[NeV]-L14-150 relation (Section 4.3). The reliance on BASS-team prior work, including Ricci et al. (2017b) for X-ray properties and Bierschenk et al. (2024) for MIR [Ne v], is not load-bearing circularity: those are independent data sets and analyses used as inputs or as corroboration, not as justifications of the present null results. The host-galaxy dust limitation is explicitly acknowledged and quantified in Sections 3.1 and 4.5, and the authors note the concordant dust-insensitive MIR [Ne v] results, so the caveat does not indicate a circular derivation. Finally, although the sample is X-ray selected, the paper presents the [Ne v]-to-X-ray ratio as an empirical calibration for future use, not as a first-principles prediction of X-ray luminosity from [Ne v]; therefore no derivation step reduces to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The empirical scaling relations are the product of the analysis, not an input. The listed assumptions are the external calibrations, physical priors, and hand-chosen thresholds that the detection fraction, null correlations, and interpretation lean on.

free parameters (4)
  • slope and intercept of L[NeV]-L14-150 relation = 0.86 +/- 0.12 and 0.30 +/- 0.09
    Empirical fit to 146 [Ne V]-detected AGN (Eq. 1); this is the reported calibration, not an input to the analysis.
  • universal bolometric correction Lbol/L14-150 = 8
    Assumed from BASS/DR2 to convert X-ray luminosity to Eddington ratio; systematic uncertainty of >0.5 dex acknowledged (Section 2.3).
  • detection threshold F[NeV]/sigma = 3
    Hand-chosen significance threshold for robust detection; detection fraction is conditional on this choice (Section 3.1).
  • narrow-line FWHM upper bound = 1200 km/s
    Separates narrow [Ne v] from broad-line emission; affects which measurements are included and the detection classification (Section 3.1).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Flat LCDM cosmology with H0 = 70 km/s/Mpc, Omega_L = 0.7, Omega_M = 0.3
    Used to convert fluxes to luminosities and to interpret the sample (Section 1).
  • domain assumption MBH-sigma* relation from Kormendy and Ho (2013) applies to the BASS narrow-line AGN
    Black-hole masses for 276 of 341 sources rely on this external scaling (Section 2.3).
  • domain assumption Bolometric luminosity is a fixed multiple of 14-150 keV luminosity, Lbol = 8 x L14-150
    Used to derive Eddington ratios; the paper acknowledges systematic uncertainty and verifies that alternative corrections do not change conclusions (Section 2.3).
  • domain assumption [Ne V] lambda3427 emission is powered almost exclusively by AGN photoionization in these systems
    Central to interpreting the line as an AGN tracer; the paper cites radiative-transfer calculations and observational samples for this (Section 1).
  • domain assumption Host-galaxy-scale dust extinction does not strongly affect the main conclusions
    No host-extinction correction is applied; the paper argues that scatter comparisons and detection in obscured sources support this (Sections 3.1, 4.5).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of BASS XLVIII: [Ne v] {\lambda}3427 Emission in Powerful Nearby Active Galactic Nuclei." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/46K7ZXDB

@misc{pith2026250708179,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: BASS XLVIII: [Ne v] \lambda3427 Emission in Powerful Nearby Active Galactic Nuclei},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/46K7ZXDB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08179}
}
abstract

We investigate the high-ionization, narrow [Ne v] $\lambda$3427 emission line in a sample of over 340 ultrahard X-ray (14-195 keV) selected Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) drawn from the BASS project. The analysis includes measurements in individual and stacked spectra, and considers several key AGN properties such as X-ray luminosity, supermassive black hole (SMBH) mass, Eddington ratios, and line-of-sight column density. The [Ne v] $\lambda$3427 line is robustly detected in ~43% (146/341) of the AGN in our sample, with no significant trends between the detection rate and key AGN/SMBH properties. In particular, the detection rate remains high even at the highest levels of obscuration (>70% for log[N_H/cm^-2] > 23). On the other hand, even some of our highest signal-to-noise spectra (S/N > 50) lack a robust [Ne v] detection. The typical (median) scaling ratios between [Ne v] line emission and (ultra-)hard X-ray emission in our sample are log L[Ne v]/L(14-150 keV) = -3.75 and log L[Ne v]/L(2-10 keV) = -3.36. The scatter on these scaling ratios, of ~0.5 dex, is comparable to, and indeed smaller than, what is found for other commonly used tracers of AGN radiative outputs (e.g., [O III] $\lambda$5007). Otherwise, we find no significant relations between the (relative) strength of [Ne v] and the basic AGN/SMBH properties under study, in contrast with simple expectations from models of SMBH accretion flows. Our results reaffirm the usability of [Ne v] as an AGN tracer even in highly obscured systems, including dual AGN and high redshift sources.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.08179 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The luminosity-redshift plane for our sample and for BASS AGN in general. We show only those BASS/DR2 AGN with either VLT/X-Shooter or Palomar/DBSP spectra available. Red symbols mark narrow-line AGN, with filled circles further highlighting those AGN for which we derived useful measurements of, or constraints on, [Ne v] λ3427 line emission. Empty blue symbols mark broad-line BASS/DR2 AGN with similar spectroscopic … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The detection fraction of [Ne v] λ3427 and its dependence on data quality. We group our BASS spectra into several bins in S/N (indicated along the horizontal axis; mind the logarithmic scaling), and calculate the percentage of spectra where [Ne v] λ3427 was robustly detected. The corresponding numbers of objects are indicated next to each data point, and the size of the data points scales with the (to￾tal) number of… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The relation between [Ne v] λ3427 and ultra-hard X-ray emission for our BASS sample of AGN. We show both the flux-flux (F[Ne v] vs. F14−150; Left) and luminosity-luminosity (L[Ne v] vs. L14−150; right) scatter plots. In both panels, the [Ne v] measurements (filled circles) and upper limits (downward facing arrows) are color-coded based on log(NH/cm−2 ) (see vertical colormap). The solid dashed black lines mark a lin… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The ratio between [Ne v] λ3427 and X-ray emission for the [Ne v]-detected sources among our sample of BASS AGN. We show distributions of both L[Ne v]/L14−150 (left) and L[Ne v]/L2−10 (right). In both cases, we show the distributions derived from [Ne v] measurements (so…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The relation between relative [Ne v] line strength, F[Ne v]/F14−150, and key properties of our BASS sample deduced from X-ray observations, including ultra-hard X-ray luminosity (L14−150, top), and line-of-sight hydrogen column density (NH, bottom). For each property, …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The relation between EW[Ne v] and NH. Symbols are the same as in Figs. 5 & 6. Here, too, the scatter is large and there is no evidence for a significant (positive) correlation between the quantities, in contrast to what may have been implied from similar plots in previ…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Results of spectral stacking analysis. Each column of panels traces spectral stacks in bins of a specific AGN property, as indicated (LX, MBH, NH, and λEdd). The left- and right-hand-side sets of plots show stacks of X-Shooter and DBSP spectra, respectively. For each s…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Example of outflow signatures in the [Ne v] λ3427 (left) and [O ii] λ3727 (right) emission lines, for the AGN BASS ID 1138. In both panels, the yellow lines mark the original continuum level (subtracted from the observed spectrum), while the red lines represent our bes…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BASS. XLIX. Characterization of highly luminous and obscured AGNs: local X-ray and [NeV]$\lambda$3426 emission in comparison with the high-redshift Universe

    astro-ph.GA 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A local sample of 21 luminous obscured AGNs shows a high [NeV] detection rate, and a stacked spectrum reveals strong [NeV] that is missing in JWST-selected high-redshift AGNs matched in [OIII].

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    P., & Satyapal, S

    Abel, N. P., & Satyapal, S. 2008, ApJ, 678, 686, doi: 10.1086/529013

    doi:10.1086/529013 2008

  2. [2]

    1988, ApJ, 332, 646, doi: 10.1086/166683

    Szuszkiewicz, E. 1988, ApJ, 332, 646, doi: 10.1086/166683

    doi:10.1086/166683 1988

  3. [3]

    L., Georgakakis, A., et al

    Aird, J., Coil, A. L., Georgakakis, A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 1892, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1062 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sipőcz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1062 2015

  4. [4]

    J., & Ceballos, M

    Barcons, X., Carrera, F. J., & Ceballos, M. T. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 757, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06238.x

    arXiv 2003

  5. [5]

    H., Tueller, J., Markwardt, C

    Baumgartner, W. H., Tueller, J., Markwardt, C. B., et al. 2013, ApJS, 207, 19, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/207/2/19

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/207/2/19 2013

  6. [6]

    2015, MNRAS, 454, 3622, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2181

    Berney, S., Koss, M., Trakhtenbrot, B., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 3622, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2181

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2181 2015

  7. [7]

    J., et al

    Bierschenk, M., Ricci, C., Temple, M. J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 257, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad844a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad844a 2024

  8. [8]

    F., Satyapal, S., & Ellison, S

    Blecha, L., Snyder, G. F., Satyapal, S., & Ellison, S. L. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 3056, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1274 Bogdán, Á., Goulding, A. D., Natarajan, P., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 126, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9 Böker, T., Beck, T. L., Birkmann, S. M., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 038001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acb846

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1274 2018

Show all 83 references
  1. [10]

    Buchner, J., & Bauer, F. E. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 4348, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2955

    2017 doi

  2. [11]

    2015, ApJ, 802, 89, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/89

    Buchner, J., Georgakakis, A., Nandra, K., et al. 2015, ApJ, 802, 89, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/89

    2015 doi

  3. [12]

    I., Graciá-Carpio, J., et al

    Burtscher, L., Davies, R. I., Graciá-Carpio, J., et al. 2016, A&A, 586, A28, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527575

    2016 doi

  4. [13]

    J., Burtscher, L., et al

    Caglar, T., Koss, M. J., Burtscher, L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 956, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf11b

    2023 doi

  5. [14]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  6. [15]

    J., Olivier, G

    Cleri, N. J., Olivier, G. M., Hutchison, T. A., et al. 2023a, ApJ, 953, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acde55

    doi

  7. [16]

    J., Yang, G., Papovich, C., et al

    Cleri, N. J., Yang, G., Papovich, C., et al. 2023b, ApJ, 948, 112, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc1e6

    doi

  8. [17]

    M., Ho, L

    Dasyra, K. M., Ho, L. C., Armus, L., et al. 2008, ApJL, 674, L9, doi: 10.1086/528843

    2008 doi

  9. [19]

    2020, A&A, 636, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    Duras, F., Bongiorno, A., Ricci, F., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    2020 doi

  10. [20]

    J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al

    Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.02465, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.02465 BASS XL VIII: the [Ne v]λ3427emission line23

    2023 doi arXiv

  11. [21]

    Fan, X., Ba∼nados, E., & Simcoe, R. A. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 373, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-102455

    2023 doi

  12. [22]

    2010, A&A, 519, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014039

    Gilli, R., Vignali, C., Mignoli, M., et al. 2010, A&A, 519, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014039

    2010 doi

  13. [23]

    2022, A&A, 666, A17, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243708

    Gilli, R., Norman, C., Calura, F., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A17, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243708

    2022 doi

  14. [24]

    K., Ricci, C., Temple, M

    Gupta, K. K., Ricci, C., Temple, M. J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.12239, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.12239

    2024 doi arXiv

  15. [25]

    2005, ApJ, 634, 161, doi: 10.1086/491665

    Kauffmann, G. 2005, ApJ, 634, 161, doi: 10.1086/491665

    2005 doi

  16. [26]

    C., & Alexander, D

    Hickox, R. C., & Alexander, D. M. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 625, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051803

    2018 doi

  17. [27]

    F., Richards, G

    Hopkins, P. F., Richards, G. T., & Hernquist, L. 2007, ApJ, 654, 731, doi: 10.1086/509629

    2007 doi

  18. [28]

    I., Noeske, K

    Izotov, Y. I., Noeske, K. G., Guseva, N. G., et al. 2004, A&A, 415, L27, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040006

    2004 doi

  19. [29]

    I., Thuan, T

    Izotov, Y. I., Thuan, T. X., & Guseva, N. G. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 2556, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2798

    2021 doi

  20. [30]

    2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    Jakobsen, P., Ferruit, P., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    2022 doi

  21. [31]

    M., Tremonti, C., et al

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    2003

  22. [33]

    J., Nicholls, D

    Kewley, L. J., Nicholls, D. C., & Sutherland, R. S. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 511, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832

    2019 doi

  23. [34]

    Kormendy, J., & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811

    2013 doi

  24. [35]

    2010, ApJL, 716, L125, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/716/2/L125

    Koss, M., Mushotzky, R., Veilleux, S., & Winter, L. 2010, ApJL, 716, L125, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/716/2/L125

    2010 doi

  25. [36]

    2011, ApJ, 739, 57, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/739/2/57

    Koss, M., Mushotzky, R., Veilleux, S., et al. 2011, ApJ, 739, 57, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/739/2/57

    2011 doi

  26. [37]

    J., Blecha, L., Bernhard, P., et al

    Koss, M. J., Blecha, L., Bernhard, P., et al. 2018, Nature, 563, 214, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0652-7

    2018 doi

  27. [38]

    J., Strittmatter, B., Lamperti, I., et al

    Koss, M. J., Strittmatter, B., Lamperti, I., et al. 2021, ApJS, 252, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abcbfe

    2021 doi

  28. [39]

    J., Trakhtenbrot, B., Ricci, C., et al

    Koss, M. J., Trakhtenbrot, B., Ricci, C., et al. 2022a, ApJS, 261, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6c8f —. 2022b, ApJS, 261, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac650b

    doi

  29. [40]

    J., Ricci, C., Trakhtenbrot, B., et al

    Koss, M. J., Ricci, C., Trakhtenbrot, B., et al. 2022c, ApJS, 261, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6c05

    doi

  30. [41]

    J., Treister, E., Kakkad, D., et al

    Koss, M. J., Treister, E., Kakkad, D., et al. 2023, ApJL, 942, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aca8f0

    2023 doi

  31. [42]

    2019, MNRAS, 489, 524, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2140

    Kubota, A., & Done, C. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 524, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2140

    2019 doi

  32. [43]

    S., et al

    Lambrides, E., Chiaberge, M., Long, A. S., et al. 2024, ApJL, 961, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad11ee

    2024 doi

  33. [44]

    2015, A&A, 578, A120, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526036

    Lanzuisi, G., Perna, M., Delvecchio, I., et al. 2015, A&A, 578, A120, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526036

    2015 doi

  34. [45]

    Laor, A., & Davis, S. W. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 681, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19310.x

    2011

  35. [46]

    Leung, G. C. K., Coil, A. L., Rupke, D. S. N., & Perrotta, S. 2021, ApJ, 914, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf4da

    2021 doi

  36. [47]

    S., Huang, J.-S., Wuyts, S., & Cao, T.-W

    Li, Z.-J., Dai, Y. S., Huang, J.-S., Wuyts, S., & Cao, T.-W. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.03416, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.03416

    2024 doi arXiv

  37. [49]

    2014, ApJL, 784, L38, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/784/2/L38

    Madau, P., Haardt, F., & Dotti, M. 2014, ApJL, 784, L38, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/784/2/L38

    2014 doi

  38. [50]

    2004, MNRAS, 351, 169, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07765.x

    Marconi, A., Risaliti, G., Gilli, R., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 169, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07765.x

    2004

  39. [51]

    M., et al

    Marcotulli, L., Ajello, M., Urry, C. M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 940, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac937f

    2022 doi

  40. [52]

    2022, ApJS, 259, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac3d31

    Matsuoka, Y., Iwasawa, K., Onoue, M., et al. 2022, ApJS, 259, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac3d31

    2022 doi

  41. [53]

    D., Satyapal, S., Laor, A., et al

    McKaig, J. D., Satyapal, S., Laor, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7a79

    2024 doi

  42. [54]

    2014, MNRAS, 441, 3177, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu762 Mejía-Restrepo, J

    Narayan, R. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 3177, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu762 Mejía-Restrepo, J. E., Trakhtenbrot, B., Koss, M. J., et al. 2022, ApJS, 261, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6602

    2014 doi

  43. [55]

    2014, MNRAS, 437, 3550, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2149

    Merloni, A., Bongiorno, A., Brusa, M., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 3550, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2149

    2014 doi

  44. [56]

    2013, A&A, 556, A29, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220846

    Mignoli, M., Vignali, C., Gilli, R., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A29, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220846

    2013 doi

  45. [57]

    M., Sánchez, F

    Negus, J., Comerford, J. M., Sánchez, F. M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 945, 127, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb772

    2023 doi

  46. [58]

    2009, MNRAS, 399, 1907, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15434.x

    Netzer, H. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 1907, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15434.x

    2009

  47. [59]

    Ofek, E. O. 2014, Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl: 1407.005. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ascl.soft07005O

    2014

  48. [60]

    B., et al

    Oh, K., Koss, M., Markwardt, C. B., et al. 2018, ApJS, 235, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa7fd

    2018 doi

  49. [61]

    J., Ueda, Y., et al

    Oh, K., Koss, M. J., Ueda, Y., et al. 2022, ApJS, 261, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5b68

    2022 doi

  50. [62]

    2005, ApJ, 628, 368, doi: 10.1086/430728

    Ohsuga, K., Mori, M., Nakamoto, T., & Mineshige, S. 2005, ApJ, 628, 368, doi: 10.1086/430728

    2005 doi

  51. [63]

    B., & Gunn, J

    Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. 1982, PASP, 94, 586, doi: 10.1086/131027

    1982 doi

  52. [64]

    S., Koss, M., Trakhtenbrot, B., et al

    Paliya, V. S., Koss, M., Trakhtenbrot, B., et al. 2019, ApJ, 881, 154, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2f8b

    2019 doi

  53. [65]

    2006, A&A, 455, 173, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20064894 24Reiss et al

    Panessa, F., Bassani, L., Cappi, M., et al. 2006, A&A, 455, 173, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20064894 24Reiss et al

    2006 doi

  54. [66]

    M., et al

    Peca, A., Cappelluti, N., Urry, C. M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 943, 162, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acac28

    2023 doi

  55. [67]

    2020, MNRAS, 492, 4058, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa078

    Pognan, Q., Trakhtenbrot, B., Sbarrato, T., Schawinski, K., & Bertemes, C. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 4058, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa078

    2020 doi

  56. [68]

    J., et al

    Ricci, C., Ueda, Y., Koss, M. J., et al. 2015, ApJL, 815, L13, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/815/1/L13

    2015 doi

  57. [69]

    E., Treister, E., et al

    Ricci, C., Bauer, F. E., Treister, E., et al. 2017a, MNRAS, 468, 1273, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx173

    doi

  58. [70]

    J., et al

    Ricci, C., Trakhtenbrot, B., Koss, M. J., et al. 2017b, ApJS, 233, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa96ad

    doi

  59. [72]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525, doi: 10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  60. [73]

    D., Lamareille, F., Maier, C., et al

    Silverman, J. D., Lamareille, F., Maier, C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 396, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/396

    2009 doi

  61. [74]

    2021, A&A, 656, A127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141856

    Simmonds, C., Schaerer, D., & Verhamme, A. 2021, A&A, 656, A127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141856

    2021 doi

  62. [75]

    A., & Malkan, M

    Spinoglio, L., Fernández-Ontiveros, J. A., & Malkan, M. A. 2022, ApJ, 941, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9da2

    2022 doi

  63. [76]

    2012, MNRAS, 426, 2703, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21772.x

    Stern, J., & Laor, A. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 2703, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21772.x

    2012

  64. [77]

    L., Crenshaw, D

    Trippe, M. L., Crenshaw, D. M., Deo, R. P., et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 1749, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/1749

    2010 doi

  65. [78]

    2015, ApJ, 815, 1, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/1 Vanden Berk, D

    Ueda, Y., Hashimoto, Y., Ichikawa, K., et al. 2015, ApJ, 815, 1, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/1 Vanden Berk, D. E., Richards, G. T., Bauer, A., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 549, doi: 10.1086/321167

    2015 doi

  66. [79]

    V., & Fabian, A

    Vasudevan, R. V., & Fabian, A. C. 2007, MNRAS, 381, 1235, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12328.x

    2007

  67. [80]

    2018, A&A, 620, A193, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732495

    Vergani, D., Garilli, B., Polletta, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A193, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732495

    2018 doi

  68. [81]

    2011, A&A, 536, A105, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117752

    Vernet, J., Dekker, H., D’Odorico, S., et al. 2011, A&A, 536, A105, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117752

    2011 doi

  69. [82]

    M., Gilli, R., & Pozzi, F

    Vignali, C., Alexander, D. M., Gilli, R., & Pozzi, F. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 48, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16275.x

    2010

  70. [83]

    2015, ApJ, 804, 148, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/148

    Volonteri, M., Silk, J., & Dubus, G. 2015, ApJ, 804, 148, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/148

    2015 doi

  71. [84]

    2021, ApJL, 907, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c6

    Wang, F., Yang, J., Fan, X., et al. 2021, ApJL, 907, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c6

    2021 doi

  72. [85]

    A., Meléndez, M., Mushotzky, R

    Weaver, K. A., Meléndez, M., Mushotzky, R. F., et al. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1151, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1151

    2010 doi

  73. [86]

    2009, ApJS, 183, 17, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/183/1/17

    Young, M., Elvis, M., & Risaliti, G. 2009, ApJS, 183, 17, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/183/1/17

    2009 doi

  74. [87]

    A., & Zakamska, N

    Yuan, S., Strauss, M. A., & Zakamska, N. L. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 1603, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1747

    2016 doi

  75. [88]

    L., Strauss, M

    Zakamska, N. L., Strauss, M. A., Krolik, J. H., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 2125, doi: 10.1086/378610

    2003 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.