Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 176 references

Unsupervised Methods for Video Quality Improvement: A Survey of Restoration and Enhancement Techniques

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This survey claims to provide a dedicated review of video restoration and enhancement methods that learn without paired clean ground truth, organizing them into five methodological families plus a loss taxonomy.

desk verdict Useful survey of a real gap, but the STBN/DAVIS table contradiction means every transcribed number needs auditing before I'd trust it. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08375 v1 pith:KPC36M7K submitted 2025-07-11 cs.CV

Alexandra Malyugina , Yini Li , Joanne Lin , Nantheera Anantrasirichai This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords videorestorationenhancementunsupervisedlearningself-supervisedzero-shotdenoisinglow-lightsyntheticdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey sets out to provide a structured map of video restoration and enhancement methods that do not require paired clean ground truth. It argues that such approaches matter because real-world footage—surveillance, low-light natural history recordings, historical archives—rarely has usable references, and it claims the existing video surveys overlook the unsupervised literature. The paper organizes recent methods into five families: unpaired domain translation, self-supervised signal design (including blind-spot and noise-based methods), consistency-based methods, degradation-aware re-degradation, and prior-based methods. It also offers a loss-function taxonomy and argues that synthetic paired datasets remain necessary for objective evaluation even when training is unsupervised. If the survey is right, practitioners can choose an unsupervised method by identifying which internal signal—temporal consistency, spatial redundancy, motion coherence, or a learned prior—their data can supply.

What carries the argument

The machinery carrying the argument is a three-part organization scheme rather than a single algorithm. The first part is the five-category taxonomy of unsupervised methods, which classifies each approach by the source of its supervision signal; the second is the loss-function taxonomy, which connects each method family to the objectives it optimizes; the third is the catalog of synthetic paired datasets, which shows how objective evaluation remains possible when training data has no ground truth. The mechanism that recurs across all five categories is internal signal exploitation: a training signal is manufactured from temporal consistency, spatial redundancy, motion coherence, cycle consistency, or an explicit or learned prior, replacing the missing ground truth. This is what lets the survey compare methods as different as a cycle-consistent translator, a blind-spot denoiser, and a plug-and-play optimizer under one conceptual roof.

What would settle it

Run the benchmark comparisons on Set8 and DAVIS using the original implementations: the paper's Section 3.3.1 asserts that STBN scores best at every noise level, but its own Table 3 lists UDVD with SSIM 0.9700 at sigma=10 and STBN with 0.9613, so recalculating those values would settle whether the transcription error lies with the survey or with the cited original papers.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that unsupervised, self-supervised, and zero-shot video restoration and enhancement has become a coherent research area that previous surveys—which the paper says center on supervised frameworks—have not covered in a dedicated way. The authors' organizing insight is that supervision can be extracted from the video itself: neighboring frames carry different noise realizations and blur patterns, optical flow gives alignment, cycle consistency preserves content, and pre-trained networks supply priors. To make this literature usable, the paper proposes a five-way methodological taxonomy (unpaired domain translation, self-supervised signal design, consistency-based methods, degradation-aware methods, and prior-based methods) and pairs it with a taxonomy of loss functions (reference-fidelity, spatial and temporal data consistency, prior-based, adversarial) and a review of synthetic paired datasets for blur, noise, low light, light attenuation, and atmospheric turbulence. An example of the method-level claim is that blind-spot video denoisers—networks that predict a pixel from its spatial and temporal neighbors without seeing the pixel itself—can approach supervised performance without ever viewing a clean frame.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's value rests on the fidelity of its transcriptions and the representativeness of its chosen methods; that premise gives way concretely in Section 3.3.1, where the claim that STBN leads at every noise level conflicts with Table 3's SSIM values on DAVIS (UDVD 0.9700 vs STBN 0.9613 at sigma=10).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Unsupervised video restoration can be applied to footage where paired ground truth is impossible, such as historical archives, surveillance feeds, and natural-history recordings.
  • Temporal redundancy is the key exploitable signal: neighboring frames carry different noise realizations and blur patterns, enabling self-supervision without clean targets.
  • Synthetic paired datasets remain necessary for objective evaluation of unsupervised methods, since PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS require references.
  • Handling multiple combined degradations in one blind method remains an unsolved problem, especially for user-generated content with shaky cameras, poor lighting, and compression artifacts.
  • Real-time deployment is an open challenge, so lightweight and efficient unsupervised models are a pressing need for downstream tasks like detection and tracking.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The taxonomy implies a design recipe: a new unsupervised method can be assembled by pairing one supervision-signal strategy with one loss family, even though the paper does not state this recipe explicitly.
  • Because the survey identifies temporal consistency as a common failure mode across all five families, a natural next step would be a benchmark that measures flicker, ghosting, and warping under fast motion, not just PSNR and SSIM.
  • The discrepancy in Table 3 between the text's claim and the reported SSIM values suggests that readers using the survey's transcribed numbers should verify them against the original papers before drawing comparative conclusions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript surveys video restoration and enhancement with a particular focus on unsupervised methods. It reviews common video degradations, traditional and supervised deep learning baselines, and then organizes unsupervised methods into five categories: domain translation, self-supervised signal design, consistency-based methods, degradation-aware methods, and prior-based methods. It also provides a typology of loss functions used in unsupervised video restoration, discusses synthetic distorted datasets for evaluation, and lists open challenges. The paper positions itself as filling a gap left by prior surveys that emphasize supervised frameworks.

Significance. If accurate, this survey would be a useful structured entry point for researchers working on unsupervised video restoration and enhancement: the taxonomy is coherent, the loss-function typology is practical, and the synthetic-data section consolidates useful references. The two comparison tables for blind-spot denoisers are a concrete asset that makes the survey immediately usable. However, the manuscript's central value proposition is to serve as a reliable reference, and that value depends on faithful transcription of cited results and a verifiable coverage claim. The internal contradictions identified below directly affect that value; they are fixable, but they require a careful audit rather than a point correction. The paper ships no code or data, but for a survey this is not a deficiency by itself.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3.1, Tables 2–3] The sentence 'the STBN consistently shows the best PSNR/SSIM scores across every noise level on both synthetic noise datasets Set8 and DAVIS when compared with other blind-spot unsupervised approaches' is contradicted by Table 3: at σ=10 on DAVIS, STBN has SSIM 0.9613 while UDVD has 0.9700 and RDRF has 0.9717. Since a survey's core value is reliable transcription, the authors must either correct the prose (e.g., 'best mean PSNR/SSIM and best PSNR at every noise level, but not the best SSIM at σ=10 on DAVIS') or correct the table if the numbers were misreported, and they should audit all other transcribed results against the cited papers.
  2. [§3.6.2] The text states that Video Dynamics Prior (VDP) [124] is 'only one work on video enhancement that uses a learning-based prior,' but the immediately preceding paragraph discusses UnDIVE [120], a video enhancement method based on a generative prior (the title of [120] is 'UnDIVE: Generalized Underwater Video Enhancement Using Generative Priors'). This is an internal inconsistency within the same subsection; the authors should revise the sentence to specify what is unique about VDP, for example that it is a learned prior trained on video dynamics rather than a prior trained on images and applied to video.
  3. [Overall survey methodology] The survey does not document its search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or the time period covered, which makes the claimed comprehensiveness unverifiable. Given that the paper explicitly positions itself as filling a gap in the survey literature, the authors should state the databases queried, the search terms, the screening process, and ideally provide a table of excluded candidates. This is not a technical correctness issue, but it is load-bearing for the paper's central claim to be a comprehensive reference.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.3.3] The phrase 'with over 1258 citations' is an informal popularity statement that will rapidly become dated and is not a technical description of the VRT model; it should be removed or replaced with a substantive description of its influence.
  2. [Tables 2 and 3] The captions of Table 2 and Table 3 cite only methods [91, 92], but the tables also list MF2F [90] and UDVD [88]; the captions should be corrected to include all four methods.
  3. [References [74] and [102]] FastDVDnet is cited twice with different numbers ([74] and [102]) for the same paper; one duplicate should be removed and the citations merged.
  4. [Fig. 8 caption] The caption refers to 'R2RF' in describing the receptive-field comparison, but the text and Section 3.5.1 use the notation R2R/ER2R/VER2R; the caption notation should be aligned with the text.
  5. [Throughout] Several typos and grammatical slips should be cleaned up: 'aadhering' (§3.3.1), 'utilisibg' (§2.2), 'iamge' (§3.1), 'fucntion' (§3.3.2), and 'no access go ground truth' (§7).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the survey is descriptive synthesis, though self-citations are frequent and one internal Table 3 versus prose inconsistency is a correctness concern rather than a circularity.

full rationale

This paper is a survey and makes no predictive or derivational claims. Its content is a structured synthesis of cited prior work: the taxonomy (domain translation, self-supervised signal design, consistency-based, degradation-aware, prior-based) is a classification scheme rather than a result derived from the paper's own equations, and the loss-function typology likewise restates distinctions already present in the cited literature. The equations reproduced in the paper (Eq. 1 degradation model, Eq. 2 atmospheric scattering model, Eq. 3 plug-and-play objective, Eqs. 4-6 losses) are standard formulations taken from external sources and are not used to derive a novel prediction or to define a term circularly. Frequent self-citations (e.g., refs. 3, 20, 25, 32, 57, 71, 83, 114, 135, 140, 141, 166) point the reader to the authors' own datasets, methods, and prior reviews, but none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem, as the sole justification of a central claim, or as a way to forbid alternative methods. The closest candidate to a load-bearing evaluative assertion is Section 3.3.1's statement that STBN 'consistently shows the best PSNR/SSIM scores across every noise level,' but this is a comparative summary of external benchmark results, not a derivation, and it is not an input to any further claim in the survey. The observed mismatch between that prose and Table 3 (on DAVIS at sigma=10, UDVD and RDRF have higher SSIM than STBN) is a transcription/accuracy defect that should be corrected, but it is not circularity. Overall, the derivation chain, such as it is for a survey, is self-contained and not circular; the modest score reflects only the prevalence of self-citations and the need to audit the transcribed numerical results.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its claims rest on three background assumptions: the completeness of its taxonomy, the fidelity of transcribed numbers, and the absence of a prior dedicated survey. These are verification assumptions, not derivational ones.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The five-category taxonomy (domain translation, self-supervised signal design, consistency, degradation-aware, prior-based) is a complete and natural partition of the unsupervised video restoration/enhancement literature.
    The survey organizes the field into this taxonomy in Section 3.1 and uses it for all subsequent structure; if a major family of methods exists outside this partition, the review is incomplete.
  • domain assumption The quantitative performance values in Tables 2 and 3 are faithful transcriptions from the original cited papers.
    The survey does not run its own experiments; the ranking claims rest entirely on numbers taken from external papers, and at least one claim is contradicted by the survey's own table (Table 3, sigma=10, SSIM).
  • domain assumption The absence of a prior dedicated survey on unsupervised video restoration (Section 1) is accurate.
    The paper's novelty rests on this negative claim; it is asserted without a documented systematic search of the literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unsupervised Methods for Video Quality Improvement: A Survey of Restoration and Enhancement Techniques." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KPC36M7K

@misc{pith2026250708375,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unsupervised Methods for Video Quality Improvement: A Survey of Restoration and Enhancement Techniques},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KPC36M7K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08375}
}
read the original abstract

Video restoration and enhancement are critical not only for improving visual quality, but also as essential pre-processing steps to boost the performance of a wide range of downstream computer vision tasks. This survey presents a comprehensive review of video restoration and enhancement techniques with a particular focus on unsupervised approaches. We begin by outlining the most common video degradations and their underlying causes, followed by a review of early conventional and deep learning methods-based, highlighting their strengths and limitations. We then present an in-depth overview of unsupervised methods, categorise by their fundamental approaches, including domain translation, self-supervision signal design and blind spot or noise-based methods. We also provide a categorization of loss functions employed in unsupervised video restoration and enhancement, and discuss the role of paired synthetic datasets in enabling objective evaluation. Finally, we identify key challenges and outline promising directions for future research in this field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

176 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [124]

    In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), vol

    Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sas- try, S., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., Krueger, G., Sutskever, I.: Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), vol. 139, pp. 8748–8763 (2021). PMLR

    2021

  2. [120]

    In: Koyejo, S., Mohamed, S., Agarwal, A., Belgrave, D., Cho, K., Oh, A

    Kawar, B., Elad, M., Ermon, S., Song, J.: Denoising diffusion restoration models. In: Koyejo, S., Mohamed, S., Agarwal, A., Belgrave, D., Cho, K., Oh, A. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 23593–23606. Curran Associates, Inc., ??? (2022). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper files/ paper/2022/file/95504595b6169131b6ed6c...

    arXiv 2022

  3. [1]

    ACM Trans

    Yao, R., Lin, G., Xia, S., Zhao, J., Zhou, Y.: Video object segmentation and tracking: A survey. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 11(4) (2020) https://doi. org/10.1145/3391743

    work page doi:10.1145/3391743 2020

  4. [2]

    Sensors 24(14) (2024)

    Yi, A., Anantrasirichai, N.: A comprehensive study of object tracking in low-light environments. Sensors 24(14) (2024)

    2024

  5. [3]

    In: Proceedings of SPIE – Automatic Target Recognition XXXV, vol

    Hill, P., Achim, A., Bull, D., Anantrasirichai, N.: Automatic object detection in atmospheric turbulence-affected environments. In: Proceedings of SPIE – Automatic Target Recognition XXXV, vol. 13463, pp. 145–147 (2025). https: //doi.org/10.1117/12.3053981

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3053981 2025

  6. [4]

    In: Frangi, A.F., Prince, J.L., Sonka, M

    Aja-Fern´ andez, S., Curiale, A.H., Prince, J.L.: Chapter 6 - image filtering: enhancement and restoration. In: Frangi, A.F., Prince, J.L., Sonka, M. (eds.) Medical Image Analysis. The MICCAI Society book Series, pp. 145–176. Aca- demic Press, ??? (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813657-7.00019-4

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813657-7.00019-4 2024

  7. [5]

    Artificial Intelligence Review 55, 589–656 (2022) https://doi.org/10

    Anantrasirichai, N., Bull, D.: Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review 55, 589–656 (2022) https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10462-021-10039-7

    2022

  8. [6]

    (eds.): Color Image and Video Enhancement

    Celebi, M.E., Lecca, M., Smolka, B. (eds.): Color Image and Video Enhancement. Springer, ??? (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09363-5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09363-5 2015

Show all 176 references
  1. [7]

    In: Computer Vision (2020)

    Yu, G., Sapiro, G.: Image enhancement and restoration: Traditional approaches. In: Computer Vision (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03243-2 233-1 . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03243-2 233-1

    2020 doi

  2. [8]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02725 (2025)

    Anantrasirichai, N., Zhang, F., Bull, D.: Artificial intelligence in creative industries: Advances prior to 2025. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02725 (2025)

    2025

  3. [10]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

    Cao, C., Yue, H., Liu, X., Yang, J.: Zero-shot video restoration and enhancement using pre-trained image diffusion model. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, pp. 1935–1943 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1609/ aaai.v39i2.32189 . https://doi.o...

    2025 doi

  4. [11]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Huang, T., Li, S., Jia, X., Lu, H., Liu, J.: Neighbor2neighbor: Self-supervised 35 denoising from single noisy images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 14781–14790 (2021)

    2021

  5. [12]

    CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology, 1–15 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1049/cit2.12405

    Liu, R., Zhu, Y., Luo, G.B.: Appearance consistency and motion coherence learn- ing for internal video inpainting. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology, 1–15 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1049/cit2.12405

    2025 doi

  6. [13]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2019)

    Wang, J., Jiao, J., Bao, L., He, S., Liu, Y., Liu, W.: Self-supervised spatio- temporal representation learning for videos by predicting motion and appearance statistics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2019)

    2019

  7. [14]

    Artificial Intelligence Review 56, 5317–5364 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10302-5

    Rota, C., Buzzelli, M., Bianco, S., Schettini, R.: Video restoration based on deep learning: A comprehensive survey. Artificial Intelligence Review 56, 5317–5364 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10302-5

    2023 doi

  8. [15]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 44(12), 9396–9416 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3126387

    Li, C., Guo, C., Han, L., Jiang, J., Cheng, M.-M., Gu, J., Loy, C.C.: Low-light image and video enhancement using deep learning: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 44(12), 9396–9416 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3126387

    2022

  9. [16]

    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10(2), 241 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/ jmse10020241

    Hu, K., Weng, C., Zhang, Y., Jin, J., Xia, Q.: An overview of underwater vision enhancement: From traditional methods to recent deep learning. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10(2), 241 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/ jmse10020241

    2022

  10. [17]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Su, S., Delbracio, M., Wang, J., Sapiro, G., Heidrich, W., Wang, O.: Deep video deblurring for hand-held cameras. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1279–1288 (2017)

    2017

  11. [18]

    The Visual Computer 41, 3801–3827 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-024-03632-8

    Xiang, Y., Zhou, H., Li, C., et al.: Deep learning in motion deblurring: Current status, benchmarks and future prospects. The Visual Computer 41, 3801–3827 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-024-03632-8

    2025 doi

  12. [19]

    In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (W ACVW), pp

    Morris, C., Anantrasirichai, N., Zhang, F., Bull, D.: DaBiT: Depth and blur informed transformer for video focal deblurring. In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (W ACVW), pp. 278–288 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/W ACVW65960.2025.00038

    2025

  13. [20]

    Artificial Intelligence Review58, 101 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-11086-6

    Hill, P., Anantrasirichai, N., Achim, A., Bull, D.: Deep learning techniques for atmospheric turbulence removal: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review58, 101 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-11086-6

    2025 doi

  14. [21]

    Springer, ??? (2022)

    Richards, J.A.: Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis. Springer, ??? (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82327-6 . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 030-82327-6 36

    2022 doi

  15. [22]

    In: CVPR (2017)

    Nah, S., Kim, T.H., Lee, K.M.: Deep multi-scale convolutional neural network for dynamic scene deblurring. In: CVPR (2017)

    2017

  16. [23]

    In: International Electron Devices Meeting

    Blanksby, A.J., Loinaz, M.J., Inglis, D., Ackland, B.D.: Noise performance of a color cmos photogate image sensor. In: International Electron Devices Meeting. IEDM Technical Digest, pp. 205–208 (1997). IEEE

    1997

  17. [24]

    IEEE transactions on image processing 17(10), 1737–1754 (2008)

    Foi, A., Trimeche, M., Katkovnik, V., Egiazarian, K.: Practical poissonian- gaussian noise modeling and fitting for single-image raw-data. IEEE transactions on image processing 17(10), 1737–1754 (2008)

    2008

  18. [25]

    Signal Processing 211, 109081 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2024.109081

    Malyugina, A., Anantrasirichai, N., Bull, D.: A topological loss function for image denoising on a new BVI-lowlight dataset. Signal Processing 211, 109081 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2024.109081

    2024

  19. [26]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), vol

    Nayar, S.K., Narasimhan, S.G.: Vision in bad weather. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), vol. 2, pp. 820–827 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.1999.790306

    1999

  20. [27]

    Information Fusion 104, 102151 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j

    Goyal, B., Dogra, A., Lepcha, D.C., Goyal, V., Alkhayyat, A., Chohan, J.S., Kukreja, V.: Recent advances in image dehazing: Formal analysis to automated approaches. Information Fusion 104, 102151 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. inffus.2023.102151

    2024

  21. [28]

    IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 15(2), 101–111 (1990)

    Jaffe, J.S.: Computer modeling and the design of optimal underwater imaging systems. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 15(2), 101–111 (1990)

    1990

  22. [29]

    In: Ocean Optics VI (1980)

    McGlamery, B.L.: A computer model for underwater camera systems. In: Ocean Optics VI (1980)

    1980

  23. [30]

    Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 24(3), 410–425 (2013)

    Kim, J.-H., Jang, W.-D., Sim, J.-Y., Kim, C.-S.: Optimized contrast enhance- ment for real-time image and video dehazing. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 24(3), 410–425 (2013)

    2013

  24. [31]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Ren, W., Tian, J., Han, Z., Chan, A., Tang, Y.: Video desnowing and deraining based on matrix decomposition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4210–4219 (2017)

    2017

  25. [32]

    https://doi.org/ 10.21227/mzny-8c77

    Anantrasirichai, N., Malyugina, A., Lin, R., Bull, D.: BVI-Lowlight: Fully Reg- istered Datasets for Low-light Image and Video Enhancement. https://doi.org/ 10.21227/mzny-8c77 . https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/mzny-8c77

    doi

  26. [33]

    IEEE Transactions on Compu- tational Imaging 3(1), 84–98 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1109/TCI.2016.2629286

    Chan, S.H., Wang, X., Elgendy, O.A.: Plug-and-play admm for image restora- tion: Fixed-point convergence and applications. IEEE Transactions on Compu- tational Imaging 3(1), 84–98 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1109/TCI.2016.2629286

    2017

  27. [34]

    37 IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence (2), 165–168 (1980)

    Lee, J.-S.: Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics. 37 IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence (2), 165–168 (1980)

    1980

  28. [35]

    IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology 18(12), 1797–1802 (2008)

    Ghazal, M., Amer, A., Ghrayeb, A.: Structure-oriented multidirectional wiener filter for denoising of image and video signals. IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology 18(12), 1797–1802 (2008)

    2008

  29. [36]

    IEEE transactions on communications 32(7), 826–831 (2003)

    Dubois, E., Sabri, S.: Noise reduction in image sequences using motion- compensated temporal filtering. IEEE transactions on communications 32(7), 826–831 (2003)

    2003

  30. [37]

    Journal of Real-Time Image Processing 10, 561–572 (2015)

    Hsia, S.-C., Hsu, W.-C., Tsai, C.-L.: High-efficiency tv video noise reduction through adaptive spatial–temporal frame filtering. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing 10, 561–572 (2015)

    2015

  31. [38]

    Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2015, 1–10 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/351763

    Yahya, A., Tan, J., Li, L.: Video noise reduction method using adaptive spatial- temporal filtering. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2015, 1–10 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/351763

    2015 doi

  32. [39]

    IEEE Transactions on image processing 16(8), 2080–2095 (2007)

    Dabov, K., Foi, A., Katkovnik, V., Egiazarian, K.: Image denoising by sparse 3-d transform-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Transactions on image processing 16(8), 2080–2095 (2007)

    2007

  33. [40]

    In: 2007 15th European Signal Processing Conference, pp

    Dabov, K., Foi, A., Egiazarian, K.: Video denoising by sparse 3d transform- domain collaborative filtering. In: 2007 15th European Signal Processing Conference, pp. 145–149 (2007)

    2007

  34. [41]

    In: 2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Signal and Image Processing (ICSIP), pp

    Li, Z., Dong, Z., Yu, A., He, Z., Yi, T.: An enhanced v-bm3d algorithm for videosar denoising combined with temporal information. In: 2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Signal and Image Processing (ICSIP), pp. 994–998 (2019). IEEE

    2019

  35. [42]

    IEEE Transactions on image processing 21(9), 3952–3966 (2012)

    Maggioni, M., Boracchi, G., Foi, A., Egiazarian, K.: Video denoising, deblocking, and enhancement through separable 4-d nonlocal spatiotemporal transforms. IEEE Transactions on image processing 21(9), 3952–3966 (2012)

    2012

  36. [43]

    The Visual Computer 27, 749–757 (2011)

    Zhang, J., Li, L., Zhang, Y., Yang, G., Cao, X., Sun, J.: Video dehazing with spatial and temporal coherence. The Visual Computer 27, 749–757 (2011)

    2011

  37. [44]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 33(12), 2341– 2353 (2010)

    He, K., Sun, J., Tang, X.: Single image haze removal using dark channel prior. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 33(12), 2341– 2353 (2010)

    2010

  38. [45]

    Open Journal of Applied Sciences 2(4), 123–127 (2013) 38

    Lin, Z., Wang, X.: Dehazing for image and video using guided filter. Open Journal of Applied Sciences 2(4), 123–127 (2013) 38

    2013

  39. [46]

    In: The 27th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2015 CCDC), pp

    Song, Y., Luo, H., Hui, B., Chang, Z.: An improved image dehazing and enhanc- ing method using dark channel prior. In: The 27th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2015 CCDC), pp. 5840–5845 (2015). IEEE

    2015

  40. [47]

    EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing 2016, 1–23 (2016)

    Lee, S., Yun, S., Nam, J.-H., Won, C.S., Jung, S.-W.: A review on dark channel prior based image dehazing algorithms. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing 2016, 1–23 (2016)

    2016

  41. [48]

    In: 2010 18th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, pp

    Lv, X., Chen, W., Shen, I.-f.: Real-time dehazing for image and video. In: 2010 18th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, pp. 62–69 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/PacificGraphics.2010.16

    2010 doi

  42. [49]

    In: 2021 IEEE 18th India Council International Conference (INDICON), pp

    Adidela, S., Singh, S., Sahu, T., Mishra, A.: Single image and video dehazing: A dark channel prior (dcp)-based approach. In: 2021 IEEE 18th India Council International Conference (INDICON), pp. 1–6 (2021). IEEE

    2021

  43. [50]

    IEEE Access 6, 10003–10014 (2018)

    Park, Y., Kim, T.-H.: Fast execution schemes for dark-channel-prior-based outdoor video dehazing. IEEE Access 6, 10003–10014 (2018)

    2018

  44. [51]

    International Journal of Computer Applications 109(7), 36–38 (2015)

    Biswas, P., Sarkar, A.S., Mynuddin, M.: Deblurring images using a wiener filter. International Journal of Computer Applications 109(7), 36–38 (2015)

    2015

  45. [52]

    Jour- nal of the optical society of America 62(1), 55–59 (1972)

    Richardson, W.H.: Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration. Jour- nal of the optical society of America 62(1), 55–59 (1972)

    1972

  46. [53]

    Journal of computational physics 228(14), 5057–5071 (2009)

    Cai, J.-F., Ji, H., Liu, C., Shen, Z.: Blind motion deblurring using multiple images. Journal of computational physics 228(14), 5057–5071 (2009)

    2009

  47. [54]

    In: Atmospheric Optics: Models, Measurements, and Target-in-the-Loop Propagation III, vol

    Aubailly, M., Vorontsov, M.A., Carhart, G.W., Valley, M.T.: Automated video enhancement from a stream of atmospherically-distorted images: the lucky- region fusion approach. In: Atmospheric Optics: Models, Measurements, and Target-in-the-Loop Propagation III, vol. 7463, pp. 10...

    2009

  48. [55]

    Inverse Problems and Imaging 7(3), 839–861 (2013)

    Lou, Y., Kang, S.H., Soatto, S., Bertozzi, A.L.: Video stabilization of atmo- spheric turbulence distortion. Inverse Problems and Imaging 7(3), 839–861 (2013)

    2013

  49. [56]

    In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP), pp

    Zhu, X., Milanfar, P.: Stabilizing and deblurring atmospheric turbulence. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP), pp. 1–8 (2011). IEEE

    2011

  50. [57]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 22(6), 2398–2408 (2013)

    Anantrasirichai, N., Achim, A., Kingsbury, N.G., Bull, D.R.: Atmospheric tur- bulence mitigation using complex wavelet-based fusion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 22(6), 2398–2408 (2013)

    2013

  51. [58]

    IEEE Transactions on 39 Consumer Electronics 44(1), 82–87 (1998)

    Kim, T.K., Paik, J.K., Kang, B.S.: Contrast enhancement system using spatially adaptive histogram equalization with temporal filtering. IEEE Transactions on 39 Consumer Electronics 44(1), 82–87 (1998)

    1998

  52. [59]

    Graphics gems 4(1), 474–485 (1994)

    Zuiderveld, K.J., et al.: Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization. Graphics gems 4(1), 474–485 (1994)

    1994

  53. [60]

    Journal of the Optical Society of America 61(1), 1–11 (1971) https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.61.000001

    Land, E.H., McCann, J.J.: Lightness and retinex theory. Journal of the Optical Society of America 61(1), 1–11 (1971) https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.61.000001

    1971 doi

  54. [61]

    In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Multimedia

    Guo, X.: Lime: A method for low-light image enhancement. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. MM ’16, pp. 87–

  55. [62]

    IEEE transactions on image processing 6(3), 451–462 (1997)

    Jobson, D.J., Rahman, Z.-u., Woodell, G.A.: Properties and performance of a center/surround retinex. IEEE transactions on image processing 6(3), 451–462 (1997)

    1997

  56. [63]

    IEEE Transactions on Image processing 6(7), 965–976 (1997)

    Jobson, D.J., Rahman, Z.-u., Woodell, G.A.: A multiscale retinex for bridg- ing the gap between color images and the human observation of scenes. IEEE Transactions on Image processing 6(7), 965–976 (1997)

    1997

  57. [64]

    In: 2019 International Conference on Recent Advances in Energy-efficient Computing and Communication (ICRAECC), pp

    Sheeba, M., Christopher, C.S.: A review on video denoising methods. In: 2019 International Conference on Recent Advances in Energy-efficient Computing and Communication (ICRAECC), pp. 1–6 (2019). IEEE

    2019

  58. [65]

    INTER- ANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT 08, 1–5 (2024) https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM32759

    Reddy, S.: Advancements in video deblurring: A comprehensive review. INTER- ANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT 08, 1–5 (2024) https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM32759

    2024 doi

  59. [66]

    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1–29 (2024)

    Ayoub, A., El-Shafai, W., El-Samie, F.E.A., Hamad, E.K., EL-Rabaie, E.-S.M.: Review of dehazing techniques: Challenges and future trends. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1–29 (2024)

    2024

  60. [67]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 44(12), 9396–9416 (2021)

    Li, C., Guo, C., Han, L., Jiang, J., Cheng, M.-M., Gu, J., Loy, C.C.: Low-light image and video enhancement using deep learning: A survey. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 44(12), 9396–9416 (2021)

    2021

  61. [68]

    Displays 81, 102614 (2024)

    Ye, J., Qiu, C., Zhang, Z.: A survey on learning-based low-light image and video enhancement. Displays 81, 102614 (2024)

    2024

  62. [69]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10772 (2022)

    Zheng, S., Ma, Y., Pan, J., Lu, C., Gupta, G.: Low-light image and video enhancement: A comprehensive survey and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10772 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Science China Information Sciences 65(1), 111101 (2022) 40

    Wang, H., Wu, Y., Li, M., Zhao, Q., Meng, D.: Survey on rain removal from videos or a single image. Science China Information Sciences 65(1), 111101 (2022) 40

    2022

  64. [71]

    Artificial Intelligence Review 58(4), 101 (2025)

    Hill, P., Anantrasirichai, N., Achim, A., Bull, D.: Deep learning techniques for atmospheric turbulence removal: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review 58(4), 101 (2025)

    2025

  65. [72]

    IAES International Journal of Arti- ficial Intelligence (IJ-AI) 14, 1518 (2025) https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v14.i2

    Lhiadi, R., Jaddar, A., Kaaouachi, A.: Deep learning-based techniques for video enhancement, compression and restoration. IAES International Journal of Arti- ficial Intelligence (IJ-AI) 14, 1518 (2025) https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v14.i2. pp1518-1530

    2025 doi

  66. [73]

    In: Medical Image Computing and Computer- assisted intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18, pp

    Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer- assisted intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18, pp...

    2015

  67. [74]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Tassano, M., Delon, J., Veit, T.: Fastdvdnet: Towards real-time deep video denoising without flow estimation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1351–1360 (2020)

    2020

  68. [75]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Yue, H., Cao, C., Liao, L., Chu, R., Yang, J.: Supervised raw video denoising with a benchmark dataset on dynamic scenes. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2301–2310 (2020)

    2020

  69. [76]

    Applied Intelligence 53(10), 12437–12447 (2023)

    Li, R., Chen, L.: Progressive deep video dehazing without explicit alignment estimation. Applied Intelligence 53(10), 12437–12447 (2023)

    2023

  70. [77]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Chan, K.C., Wang, X., Yu, K., Dong, C., Loy, C.C.: Basicvsr: The search for essential components in video super-resolution and beyond. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4947–4956 (2021)

    2021

  71. [78]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Chan, K.C., Zhou, S., Xu, X., Loy, C.C.: Basicvsr++: Improving video super- resolution with enhanced propagation and alignment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 5970– 5979 (2022)

    2022

  72. [79]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Yang, W., Liu, J., Feng, J.: Frame-consistent recurrent video deraining with dual-level flow. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1661–1670 (2019)

    2019

  73. [80]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Liang, J., Cao, J., Fan, Y., Zhang, K., Ranjan, R., Li, Y., Timofte, R., Van Gool, L.: Vrt: A video restoration transformer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1450–1460 (2022)

    2022

  74. [81]

    Jing, L., Tian, Y.: Self-Supervised Visual Feature Learning With Deep Neural Networks: A Survey 43(11), 4037–4058 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020. 2992393 . Accessed 2025-05-26 41

    2020 doi

  75. [82]

    2223–2232

    Zhu, J.-Y., Park, T., Isola, P., Efros, A.A.: Unpaired Image-To-Image Transla- tion Using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks, pp. 2223–2232

  76. [83]

    In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp

    Anantrasirichai, N., Bull, D.: Contextual colorization and denoising for low- light ultra high resolution sequences. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 1614–1618 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ ICIP42928.2021.9506694

    2021

  77. [84]

    Accessed 2025-05-26

    Fuoli, D., Huang, Z., Paudel, D.P., Van Gool, L., Timofte, R.: An Efficient Recurrent Adversarial Framework for Unsupervised Real-Time Video Enhance- ment 131(4), 1042–1059 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-022-01735-0 . Accessed 2025-05-26

    doi

  78. [85]

    Accessed 2025-05-26

    Patil, P.W., Randive, S.N., Gupta, S., Rana, S., Venkatesh, S., Murala, S.: Unpaired recurrent learning for real-world video de-hazing 166, 111698 https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2025.111698 . Accessed 2025-05-26

    2025

  79. [86]

    Accessed 2025-05-26

    Lv, X., Zhang, S., Wang, C., Zhang, W., Yao, H., Huang, Q.: Unsupervised Low- Light Video Enhancement With Spatial-Temporal Co-Attention Transformer 32, 4701–4715 https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2023.3301332 . Accessed 2025-05-26

    2023

  80. [87]

    arXiv:2308.09388 (2023)

    Li, X., Ren, Y., Jin, X., Lan, C., Wang, X., Zeng, W., Wang, X., Chen, Z.: Dif- fusion models for image restoration and enhancement – a comprehensive survey. arXiv:2308.09388 (2023)

    2023

  81. [89]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.04189 (2018)

    Lehtinen, J., Munkberg, J., Hasselgren, J., Laine, S., Karras, T., Aittala, M., Aila, T.: Noise2noise: Learning image restoration without clean data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.04189 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  82. [90]

    In: 2021 IEEE Winter Con- ference on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), pp

    Dewil, V., Anger, J., Davy, A., Ehret, T., Facciolo, G., Arias, P.: Self-supervised training for blind multi-frame video denoising. In: 2021 IEEE Winter Con- ference on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), pp. 2723–2733. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/W ACV48630.2021.00277 ...

    2021

  83. [91]

    https: //doi.org/10.1145/2964284.2967188

    Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2016). https: //doi.org/10.1145/2964284.2967188 . https://doi.org/10.1145/2964284.2967188

    2016

  84. [92]

    In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp

    Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhang, D., Fu, Y.: Recurrent Self-Supervised Video Denois- ing with Denser Receptive Field. In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 7363–7372. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3581783.3612228 . https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.114...

  85. [93]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence, vol

    Chen, Z., Jiang, T., Hu, X., Zhang, W., Li, H., Wang, H.: Spatiotem- poral blind-spot network with calibrated flow alignment for self-supervised video denoising. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence, vol. 39, pp. 2411–2419 (2025). https://doi.org...

    2025 doi

  86. [94]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (2024)

    Lyu, X., Hou, J.: Enhancing low-light light field images with a deep compensa- tion unfolding network. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (2024)

    2024

  87. [95]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Wu, W., Weng, J., Zhang, P., Wang, X., Yang, W., Jiang, J.: Uretinex-net: Retinex-based deep unfolding network for low-light image enhancement. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 5901–5910 (2022)

    2022

  88. [96]

    In: Leonardis, A., Ricci, E., Roth, S., Russakovsky, O., Sattler, T., Varol, G

    Zhu, L., Yang, W., Chen, B., Zhu, H., Ni, Z., Mao, Q., Wang, S.: Unrolled Decomposed Unpaired Learning for Controllable Low-Light Video Enhance- ment. In: Leonardis, A., Ricci, E., Roth, S., Russakovsky, O., Sattler, T., Varol, G. (eds.) Computer Vision – ECCV 2024 vol. 15081,...

    2024 doi

  89. [97]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Wang, R., Xu, X., Fu, C.-W., Lu, J., Yu, B., Jia, J.: Seeing dynamic scene in the dark: A high-quality video dataset with mechatronic alignment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 9700–9709 (2021)

    2021

  90. [98]

    In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp

    Ryu, E., Liu, J., Wang, S., Chen, X., Wang, Z., Yin, W.: Plug-and-play methods provably converge with properly trained denoisers. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 5546–5557 (2019)

    2019

  91. [99]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 31, 6344–6355 (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TIP.2022.3211473

    Nair, P., Chaudhury, K.N.: Plug-and-play regularization using linear solvers. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 31, 6344–6355 (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TIP.2022.3211473

    2022

  92. [100]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 44(10), 6360–6376 (2022) https://doi.org/10

    Zhang, K., Li, Y., Zuo, W., Zhang, L., Van Gool, L., Timofte, R.: Plug-and- play image restoration with deep denoiser prior. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 44(10), 6360–6376 (2022) https://doi.org/10. 1109/TPAMI.2021.3088914

    2022

  93. [101]

    IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 40(1), 85–97 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2022.3199595

    Kamilov, U.S., Bouman, C.A., Buzzard, G.T., Wohlberg, B.: Plug-and-play methods for integrating physical and learned models in computational imaging: Theory, algorithms, and applications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 40(1), 85–97 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2022.3199595

    2023

  94. [102]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 44(10), 7093–7111 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/ 43 TPAMI.2021.3099035

    Yuan, X., Liu, Y., Suo, J., Durand, F., Dai, Q.: Plug-and-play algorithms for video snapshot compressive imaging. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 44(10), 7093–7111 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/ 43 TPAMI.2021.3099035

    2022

  95. [103]

    In: 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Tassano, M., Delon, J., Veit, T.: Fastdvdnet: Towards real-time deep video denoising without flow estimation. In: 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1351–1360 (2020). https: //doi.org/10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00143

    2020

  96. [104]

    IEEE Access 12, 11963–11971 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024

    Zerva, M.C., Kondi, L.P.: Video super-resolution using plug-and-play priors. IEEE Access 12, 11963–11971 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024. 3355195

    2024 doi

  97. [105]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 26(7), 3142–3155 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2017.2662206

    Zhang, K., Zuo, W., Chen, Y., Meng, D., Zhang, L.: Beyond a gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep cnn for image denoising. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 26(7), 3142–3155 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2017.2662206

    2017

  98. [106]

    Lin, J., Hu, X., Cai, Y., Wang, H., Yan, Y., Zou, X., Zhang, Y., Gool, L.V.: Unsupervised Flow-Aligned Sequence-to-Sequence Learning for Video Restoration

  99. [107]

    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.01519

    Yeh, C.-H., Lin, C.-Y., Wang, Z., Hsiao, C.-W., Chen, T.-H., Shiu, H.-S., Liu, Y.-L.: DiffIR2VR-Zero: Zero-Shot Video Restoration with Diffusion-based Image Restoration Models. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.01519 . http://arxiv. org/abs/2407.01519 Accessed 2025-05-26

    doi

  100. [108]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp

    Varghese, N., Kumar, A., Rajagopalan, A.N.: Self-supervised monocular under- water depth recovery, image restoration, and a real-sea video dataset. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 12248–12258 (2023)

    2023

  101. [109]

    In: Computer Vision – ECCV 2024: 18th European Conference, Milan, Italy, September 29–October 4, 2024, Proceedings, Part L VI, pp

    Fu, Z., Guo, L., Wang, C., Wang, Y., Li, Z., Wen, B.: Temporal As a Plugin: Unsupervised Video Denoising with Pre-trained Image Denois- ers. In: Computer Vision – ECCV 2024: 18th European Conference, Milan, Italy, September 29–October 4, 2024, Proceedings, Part L VI, pp. 349–3...

    2024 doi

  102. [110]

    In: 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (W ACVW), pp

    Zheng, S., Gupta, G.: Semantic-Guided Zero-Shot Learning for Low- Light Image/Video Enhancement. In: 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (W ACVW), pp. 581–590. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/W ACVW54805.2022.00064 . https://ieeexplore. i...

    2022

  103. [111]

    In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP), pp

    Chen, H., Gu, J., Gallo, O., Liu, M.-Y., Veeraraghavan, A., Kautz, J.: Reblur2Deblur: Deblurring videos via self-supervised learning. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP), pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCPHOT.2018.8368468 . https://iee...

    2018

  104. [112]

    In: 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Lee, S., Cho, D., Kim, J., Kim, T.H.: Restore from Restored: Video Restoration with Pseudo Clean Video. In: 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 3536–3545. IEEE. https://doi.org/10. 1109/CVPR46437.2021.00354 . https://ieeexplore.ieee....

    2021

  105. [113]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Ehret, T., Davy, A., Morel, J.-M., Facciolo, G., Arias, P.: Model-blind video denoising via frame-to-frame training. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11369–11378 (2019)

    2019

  106. [114]

    Accessed 2025-05-26

    Zheng, H., Pang, T., Ji, H.: Unsupervised Deep Video Denoising with Untrained Network 37(3), 3651–3659 https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i3.25476 . Accessed 2025-05-26

    2025 doi

  107. [115]

    In: European Signal Process- ing Conference (2025)

    Li, Y., Anantrasirichai, N.: Zero-TIG: Temporal consistency-aware zero-shot illumination-guided low-light video enhancement. In: European Signal Process- ing Conference (2025)

    2025

  108. [116]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Shi, Y., Liu, D., Zhang, L., Tian, Y., Xia, X., Fu, X.: Zero-ig: zero-shot illumination-guided joint denoising and adaptive enhancement for low-light images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3015–3024 (2024)

    2024

  109. [117]

    Artificial Intel- ligence Review 58(116) (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-11034-4

    Pandey, P., Gupta, R., Goel, N.: Comprehensive review of single image defogging techniques: enhancement, prior, and learning based approaches. Artificial Intel- ligence Review 58(116) (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-11034-4

    2025 doi

  110. [118]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Ulyanov, D., Vedaldi, A., Lempitsky, V.: Deep image prior. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 9446–9454 (2018)

    2018

  111. [119]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 44(11), 7474–7489 (2022) https:// doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3115428

    Pan, X., Zhan, X., Dai, B., Lin, D., Loy, C.C., Luo, P.: Exploiting deep generative prior for versatile image restoration and manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 44(11), 7474–7489 (2022) https:// doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3115428

    2022

  112. [121]

    In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), pp

    Srinath, S., Chandrasekar, A., Jamadagni, H., Soundararajan, R., A P, P.: UnDIVE: Generalized underwater video enhancement using generative pri- ors. In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), pp. 9001–9012 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/W...

    2025

  113. [122]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol

    Ho, J., Jain, A., Abbeel, P.: Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851 (2020)

    2020

  114. [123]

    In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Interna- tional Conference on Multimedia

    Wen, Y., Gao, T., Chen, T.: Unpaired photo-realistic image deraining with energy-informed diffusion model. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Interna- tional Conference on Multimedia. MM ’24, pp. 360–369 (2024). https://doi.org/ 10.1145/3664647.3680560

    2024

  115. [125]

    In: Oh, A., Naumann, T., Globerson, A., Saenko, K., Hardt, M., Levine, S

    Shrivastava, G., Lim, S.N., Shrivastava, A.: Video dynamics prior: An internal learning approach for robust video enhancements. In: Oh, A., Naumann, T., Globerson, A., Saenko, K., Hardt, M., Levine, S. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, vol. 36, pp. 34...

    2023

  116. [126]

    Communications of the ACM 63(11), 139–144 (2020)

    Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., Bengio, Y.: Generative adversarial networks. Communications of the ACM 63(11), 139–144 (2020)

    2020

  117. [127]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Nah, S., Hyun Kim, T., Mu Lee, K.: Deep multi-scale convolutional neural net- work for dynamic scene deblurring. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3883–3891 (2017)

    2017

  118. [128]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp

    Nah, S., Baik, S., Hong, S., Moon, G., Son, S., Timofte, R., Mu Lee, K.: Ntire 2019 challenge on video deblurring and super-resolution: Dataset and study. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp. 0–0 (2019)

    2019

  119. [129]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Zhou, S., Li, C., Change Loy, C.: Lednet: Joint low-light enhancement and deblurring in the dark. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 573–589 (2022). Springer

    2022

  120. [130]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Guo, C., Li, C., Guo, J., Loy, C.C., Hou, J., Kwong, S., Cong, R.: Zero-reference deep curve estimation for low-light image enhancement. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1780– 1789 (2020)

    2020

  121. [131]

    In: Proceedings of 46 the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Zamir, S.W., Arora, A., Khan, S., Hayat, M., Khan, F.S., Yang, M.-H., Shao, L.: Cycleisp: Real image restoration via improved data synthesis. In: Proceedings of 46 the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2696–2705 (2020)

    2020

  122. [132]

    In: 2024 IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Yang, L., Kang, B., Huang, Z., Xu, X., Feng, J., Zhao, H.: Depth Anything: Unleashing the power of large-scale unlabeled data. In: 2024 IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 10371–10381 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.00987

    2024

  123. [133]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Li, R., Wang, Y., Chen, S., Zhang, F., Gu, J., Xue, T.: Dualdn: Dual-domain denoising via differentiable isp. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 160–177 (2025). Springer

    2025

  124. [134]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 44(11), 8520–8537 (2021)

    Wei, K., Fu, Y., Zheng, Y., Yang, J.: Physics-based noise modeling for extreme low-light photography. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 44(11), 8520–8537 (2021)

    2021

  125. [135]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp

    Zhang, F., Xu, B., Li, Z., Liu, X., Lu, Q., Gao, C., Sang, N.: Towards general low-light raw noise synthesis and modeling. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 10820–10830 (2023)

    2023

  126. [136]

    In: 33rd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) (2025)

    Malyugina, A., Huang, G., Ruiz, E., Leslie, B., Anantrasirichai, N.: Marine Snow Removal Using Internally Generated Pseudo Ground Truth. In: 33rd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) (2025)

    2025

  127. [137]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Kousha, S., Maleky, A., Brown, M.S., Brubaker, M.A.: Modeling srgb camera noise with normalizing flows. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 17463–17471 (2022)

    2022

  128. [138]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Fu, Z., Guo, L., Wen, B.: srgb real noise synthesizing with neighboring correlation-aware noise model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1683–1691 (2023)

    2023

  129. [139]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Zheng, D., Zou, Y., Zhang, X., Bao, C.: Senm-vae: Semi-supervised noise modeling with hierarchical variational autoencoder. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 25889–25899 (2024)

    2024

  130. [140]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Monakhova, K., Richter, S.R., Waller, L., Koltun, V.: Dancing under the stars: Video denoising in starlight. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 16241–16251 (2022)

    2022

  131. [141]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12169

    Lin, J., Morris, C., Lin, R., Zhang, F., Bull, D., Anantrasirichai, N.: Towards a General-Purpose Zero-Shot Synthetic Low-Light Image and Video Pipeline (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12169

    2025 arXiv

  132. [142]

    47 In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp

    Anantrasirichai, N., Burn, J., Bull, D.R.: Robust texture features based on undecimated dual-tree complex wavelets and local magnitude binary patterns. 47 In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 3957–3961 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2015.7351548

    2015

  133. [143]

    International Journal of Computer Vision 129(7), 2175–2193 (2021)

    Lv, F., Li, Y., Lu, F.: Attention guided low-light image enhancement with a large scale low-light simulation dataset. International Journal of Computer Vision 129(7), 2175–2193 (2021)

    2021

  134. [144]

    IEEE Transac- tions on Image Processing 30, 2072–2086 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP

    Yang, W., Wang, W., Huang, H., Wang, S., Liu, J.: Sparse gradient regularized deep retinex network for robust low-light image enhancement. IEEE Transac- tions on Image Processing 30, 2072–2086 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP. 2021.3050850

    2021

  135. [145]

    In: Vedaldi, A., Bischof, H., Brox, T., Frahm, J.-M

    Triantafyllidou, D., Moran, S., McDonagh, S., Parisot, S., Slabaugh, G.: Low light video enhancement using synthetic data produced with an intermediate domain mapping. In: Vedaldi, A., Bischof, H., Brox, T., Frahm, J.-M. (eds.) Computer Vision – ECCV 2020, pp. 103–119. Springe...

    2020

  136. [146]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2019)

    Chen, C., Chen, Q., Do, M.N., Koltun, V.: Seeing motion in the dark. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2019)

    2019

  137. [147]

    In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp

    Zhang, Y., Ding, L., Sharma, G.: HazeRD: An outdoor scene dataset and bench- mark for single image dehazing. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 3205–3209 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP. 2017.8296874

    2017

  138. [148]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference (CVPR), pp

    Wang, R., Zheng, Y., Zhang, Z., Li, C., Liu, S., Zhai, G., Liu, X.: Learning hazing to dehazing: Towards realistic haze generation for real-world image dehazing. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference (CVPR), pp. 23091–23100 (2025)

    2025

  139. [149]

    In: 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Xu, J., Hu, X., Zhu, L., Dou, Q., Dai, J., Qiao, Y., Heng, P.-A.: Video Dehaz- ing via a Multi-Range Temporal Alignment Network with Physical Prior. In: 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 18053–18062. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/C...

    2023

  140. [150]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Cordts, M., Omran, M., Ramos, S., Rehfeld, T., Enzweiler, M., Benenson, R., Franke, U., Roth, S., Schiele, B.: The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3213–3223 (2016)

    2016

  141. [151]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Guizilini, V., Ambrus, R., Pillai, S., Raventos, A., Gaidon, A.: 3d packing for self-supervised monocular depth estimation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2485–2494 (2020)

    2020

  142. [152]

    Computer Vision and Image Understanding 193, 102907 (2020)

    Wen, L., Du, D., Cai, Z., Lei, Z., Chang, M.-C., Qi, H., Lim, J., Yang, M.-H., 48 Lyu, S.: Ua-detrac: A new benchmark and protocol for multi-object detection and tracking. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 193, 102907 (2020)

    2020

  143. [153]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 44(11), 7380–7399 (2021)

    Zhu, P., Wen, L., Du, D., Bian, X., Fan, H., Hu, Q., Ling, H.: Detection and tracking meet drones challenge. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 44(11), 7380–7399 (2021)

    2021

  144. [154]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.00675 (2017)

    Pont-Tuset, J., Perazzi, F., Caelles, S., Arbel´ aez, P., Sorkine-Hornung, A., Van Gool, L.: The 2017 davis challenge on video object segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.00675 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  145. [155]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Zhang, X., Dong, H., Pan, J., Zhu, C., Tai, Y., Wang, C., Li, J., Huang, F., Wang, F.: Learning to restore hazy video: A new real-world dataset and a new method. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 9239–9248 (2021)

    2021

  146. [156]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 1–1 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2017.2730363 arXiv:1702.07392 [cs]

    Li, J., Skinner, K.A., Eustice, R.M., Johnson-Roberson, M.: WaterGAN: Unsu- pervised Generative Network to Enable Real-time Color Correction of Monocular Underwater Images. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 1–1 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2017.2730363 arXiv:1702.07392 [cs]

    2017

  147. [157]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11506 (2024)

    Du, D., Li, E., Si, L., Xu, F., Niu, J.: End-to-end underwater video enhancement: Dataset and model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11506 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  148. [158]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, pp

    Ye, T., Chen, S., Liu, Y., Ye, Y., Chen, E., Li, Y.: Underwater light field retention: Neural rendering for underwater imaging. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, pp. 488–497 (2022)

    2022

  149. [159]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 29, 4376–4389 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2019

    Li, C., Guo, C., Ren, W., Cong, R., Hou, J., Kwong, S., Tao, D.: An under- water image enhancement benchmark dataset and beyond. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 29, 4376–4389 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2019. 2955241

    2020 doi

  150. [160]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Hirsch, M., Sra, S., Sch¨ olkopf, B., Harmeling, S.: Efficient filter flow for space- variant multiframe blind deconvolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 607–614. IEEE, ??? (2010)

    2010

  151. [161]

    Mathematics and Computation in Geometry and Data 1(1), 1–33 (2021)

    Chak, W.H., Lau, C.P., Lui, L.M.: Subsampled turbulence removal network. Mathematics and Computation in Geometry and Data 1(1), 1–33 (2021)

    2021

  152. [162]

    In: Technical Conference on Electro Magnetic Remote Sensing (2009)

    Woods, S., Kent, P., Burnett, J.G.: Lucky imaging using phase diversity image quality metric. In: Technical Conference on Electro Magnetic Remote Sensing (2009)

    2009

  153. [163]

    Optical Engineering 56(7), 071502 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.56.7.071502

    Hardie, R.C., Power, J.D., LeMaster, D.A., Bose-Pillai, D.R.D.S.: Simulation of 49 anisoplanatic imaging through optical turbulence using numerical wave propa- gation with new validation analysis. Optical Engineering 56(7), 071502 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.56.7.071502

    2017 doi

  154. [164]

    In: 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp

    Mao, Z., Chimitt, N., Chan, S.H.: Accelerating atmospheric turbulence simu- lation via learned phase-to-space transform. In: 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 14739–14748 (2021). https://doi. org/10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01449

    2021

  155. [165]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 17(3), 587–598 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2023.3238552

    Mei, K., Patel, V.M.: Ltt-gan: Looking through turbulence by inverting gans. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 17(3), 587–598 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2023.3238552

    2023

  156. [166]

    Optical Engineering 59(8), 083101 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.59.8.083101

    Chimitt, N., Chan, S.H.: Simulating anisoplanatic turbulence by sampling inter- modal and spatially correlated zernike coefficients. Optical Engineering 59(8), 083101 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.59.8.083101

    2020 doi

  157. [167]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 22(6), 2398–2408 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2013

    Anantrasirichai, N., Achim, A., Kingsbury, N.G., Bull, D.R.: Atmospheric tur- bulence mitigation using complex wavelet-based fusion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 22(6), 2398–2408 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2013. 2249078

    2013 doi

  158. [168]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision (2022)

    Mao, Z., Jaiswal, A., Wang, Z., Chan, S.H.: Single frame atmospheric turbulence mitigation: A benchmark study and a new physics-inspired transformer model. In: European Conference on Computer Vision (2022)

    2022

  159. [169]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference (CVPR) Workshops, pp

    Safonov, N., Bryntsev, A., Moskalenko, A., Kulikov, D., Vatolin, D., Timofte, R., Lei, H., Gao, Q., Luo, Q., Li, Y., Song, J., Hao, S., Zheng, M., Xu, J., Wu, C., Liu, J., Chen, Y., Deng, X., Xu, M., Liang, P., Ma, J., Jin, J., Pang, Y., Luo, F., Chen, K., Zhao, S., Wu, M., Li...

    2025

  160. [170]

    In: Koyejo, S., Mohamed, S., Agar- wal, A., Belgrave, D., Cho, K., Oh, A

    Zhang, Z., Xu, R., Liu, M., Yan, Z., Zuo, W.: Self-supervised image restora- tion with blurry and noisy pairs. In: Koyejo, S., Mohamed, S., Agar- wal, A., Belgrave, D., Cho, K., Oh, A. (eds.) Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 29179–29191. Curran...

    2022

  161. [171]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Poirier-Ginter, Y., Lalonde, J.-F.: Robust unsupervised stylegan image restora- tion. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 22292–22301 (2023)

    2023

  162. [172]

    IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 69(1), 97–117 50 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/TBC.2022.3191059

    Pinson, M.H.: Why no reference metrics for image and video quality lack accu- racy and reproducibility. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 69(1), 97–117 50 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/TBC.2022.3191059

    2023

  163. [173]

    In: 2012 Conference Record of the Forty Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Comput- ers (ASILOMAR), pp

    Saad, M.A., Bovik, A.C.: Blind quality assessment of videos using a model of natural scene statistics and motion coherency. In: 2012 Conference Record of the Forty Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Comput- ers (ASILOMAR), pp. 332–336 (2012). https://doi.org/10....

    2012 doi

  164. [174]

    In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2018)

    Lai, W.-S., Huang, J.-B., Wang, O., Shechtman, E., Yumer, E., Yang, M.-H.: Learning blind video temporal consistency. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2018)

    2018

  165. [175]

    IEEE Signal Processing Letters 22(3), 209–212 (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2013.2295092

    Mittal, A., Soundararajan, R., Bovik, A.C.: Making a completely blind image quality analyzer. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 22(3), 209–212 (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2013.2295092

    2013

  166. [176]

    In: 2011 Conference Record of the Forty Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR), pp

    Mittal, A., Moorthy, A.K., Bovik, A.C.: Blind/referenceless image spatial quality evaluator. In: 2011 Conference Record of the Forty Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR), pp. 723–727 (2011). https: //doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.2011.6190099

    2011

  167. [177]

    In: Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Communications (NCC)

    Venkatanath, N., Praneeth, D., Chandrasekhar, B.M., Channappayya, S.S., Medasani, S.S.: Blind image quality evaluation using perception based features. In: Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Communications (NCC). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ (2015)

    2015

  168. [178]

    In: AAAI (2023) 51

    Wang, J., Chan, K.C., Loy, C.C.: Exploring clip for assessing the look and feel of images. In: AAAI (2023) 51

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.