Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions

As of 20 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 50 of 50 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2507.08881.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2507.08881 v1

Coverage vector

measured 50 of 50 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:11.579174Z

measured 50 of 50 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

50 of 50 outbound references displayed

verified exact1
verified fuzzy34
unresolved15
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 1ce69d67-5897-4796-a9a1-f25e16f98acd · outbound

This paper cites Technical report (2025).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2025)

Reference 1

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:22.953380Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 6785307d-cfb3-4934-b3ab-3204ebaf0e2d · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:22.733690Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 40399c9d-6f8a-4c06-9a3f-74bf1cca2c02 · outbound

This paper cites Technical report (2024).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)

Reference 3

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:22.507434Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation c7ed0abb-c784-43f1-90d2-696be4bff6a5 · outbound

This paper cites The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity

Reference 4

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:03.397957Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c4a39fd7-7a62-447c-82de-3b00d38471ba · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work

Reference 5

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:11.785453Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 1feccfe9-66c2-4446-ab70-a61535e1d488 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work

Reference 6

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:22.239394Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 66934d1b-b8ae-4a03-9399-99f13253cd02 · outbound

This paper cites legal market.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions legal market

Reference 7

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:22.048268Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 877ac962-bf3a-4a87-8915-920f2e581b2f · outbound

This paper cites Weber, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology , G.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Weber, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology , G

Reference 8

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:20.939413Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 5a53bc66-4008-4ec0-add5-7616f1113d52 · outbound

This paper cites Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action: V ol.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action: V ol

Reference 9

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:19.900075Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 654d24e4-8eb6-4994-b1c2-c7fa58e212d7 · outbound

This paper cites Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action: V ol.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action: V ol

Reference 10

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:19.591498Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation b483769f-cd04-4861-b2ad-2c66e0d97927 · outbound

This paper cites Morison, A.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Morison, A

Reference 11

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:19.309662Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 5aac0ba6-ecbd-4cd3-ad47-de1879163074 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work

Reference 12

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:19.144853Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 4a67e692-872a-4fe2-a4e8-020949bbad30 · outbound

This paper cites Technical report (2024).https://www.creativerightsinstitute.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024).https://www.creativerightsinstitute

Reference 13

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:19.042455Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 2f7b3a27-cbbf-4996-b00a-809f8a9290af · outbound

This paper cites Technical report (2024).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)

Reference 14

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:18.902828Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation ecb39e43-f6eb-4ae5-8a8e-1af325ed4d85 · outbound

This paper cites Technical report (2024).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)

Reference 15

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:18.701846Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation bf2ab4b7-ce16-4328-b0a6-21cce2ee569e · outbound

This paper cites Technical report (2024).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)

Reference 16

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:18.504907Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 2dde9960-56e3-4934-b182-ef19fe12067a · outbound

This paper cites Technical re- port (2024).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical re- port (2024)

Reference 17

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:18.347207Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation e64bbc9a-6fa9-4eef-9c57-2aea2eb41fc1 · outbound

This paper cites Surani et al., AI for scaling legal reform: Mapping and redacting racial covenants in Santa Clara County.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Surani et al., AI for scaling legal reform: Mapping and redacting racial covenants in Santa Clara County

Reference 18

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:18.224561Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation e83e63ac-f224-45c3-b99d-bd9ba7544149 · outbound

This paper cites Technical report (2024).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)

Reference 19

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:18.053593Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation eb4e7ca2-fe9f-4199-9a77-d87e7f87e2c8 · outbound

This paper cites Technical report (2025).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2025)

Reference 20

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:17.874226Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation d747b07e-7371-4338-a013-d1d21d2e74b5 · outbound

This paper cites Technical report (2025).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2025)

Reference 21

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:17.705911Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 1788ea32-b293-4abe-9410-f760e367175f · outbound

This paper cites Technical report (2024).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)

Reference 22

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:17.483431Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 986fb662-d0f2-404d-a0ac-9ef238351b60 · outbound

This paper cites Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Tools.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Tools

Reference 23

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:05.738071Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation dff4926b-6ffb-410e-94d6-e75c85a25517 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work

Reference 24

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:17.241254Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation fb631d3d-c7ad-4aa3-83c1-464afc7d0556 · outbound

This paper cites A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge

Reference 25

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:05.985629Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 9f0240b4-d52e-4b33-a97a-42667c2218f5 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work

Reference 26

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:16.986987Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation a90de854-08a4-4ae0-bae7-946dd7566361 · outbound

This paper cites Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law

Reference 27

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:06.205155Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 9c05d50d-dc19-4048-a106-7a55dbd8e76f · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work

Reference 28

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:16.759113Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation dfd0c2ea-d23f-4bc6-bab0-9bf8d289f13a · outbound

This paper cites Loomis, 881 N.W.2d 749 (Wis.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Loomis, 881 N.W.2d 749 (Wis

Reference 29

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:16.579001Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 1a095e91-be39-4ece-a31b-ee9389b727e4 · outbound

This paper cites Technical report (2024).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)

Reference 30

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:16.409471Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 35c6de16-3ddc-46bc-9f23-82886506b6d8 · outbound

This paper cites AI-assisted trial system.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions AI-assisted trial system

Reference 31

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:16.216950Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 5f0b355a-3595-4843-9765-ca026e669050 · outbound

This paper cites Thomas, 2024 UK judicial attitude survey.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Thomas, 2024 UK judicial attitude survey

Reference 32

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:15.992449Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation d6f6ba0a-6b7e-4021-a59e-c1f1faf9516b · outbound

This paper cites Technical report (2024).https://www.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024).https://www

Reference 33

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:15.765542Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 954f8457-0867-4ee5-9fef-d939c0dea1d9 · outbound

This paper cites The Florida Bar News (2024).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions The Florida Bar News (2024)

Reference 34

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:15.576735Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 875720eb-2d8e-4548-aaf1-a91ef68a024d · outbound

This paper cites Technical report (2024).https://www.bloomberglaw.com/ bloomberg-law-research-reports (accessed 17 June 2025).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024).https://www.bloomberglaw.com/ bloomberg-law-research-reports (accessed 17 June 2025)

Reference 35

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:15.364694Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation ac1c1e76-678a-4f43-a541-1a20b2e278a2 · outbound

This paper cites public and AI experts view artificial intelli- gence.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions public and AI experts view artificial intelli- gence

Reference 36

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:15.169851Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation f8223809-20dc-460c-8706-05e0c7627b06 · outbound

This paper cites Technical report (2024).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)

Reference 37

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:14.992467Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation f4c80cfe-9f03-4329-97e2-f34b581ff84e · outbound

This paper cites democracy in the age of AI.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions democracy in the age of AI

Reference 38

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:14.796993Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 76f5d87d-63f8-437f-ae0e-637fa8f7be9a · outbound

This paper cites Technical report (2024).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)

Reference 39

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:14.542970Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 9af17cdd-adff-46e4-9086-c0b456bf5bc3 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work

Reference 40

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:14.281844Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 7dd45685-b44b-4cb1-b2f6-cbde034358eb · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work

Reference 41

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:14.007934Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 74fa1241-5b9f-4ddc-bb64-0be183477371 · outbound

This paper cites https://www.legaldive.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions https://www.legaldive

Reference 42

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:13.797548Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 09ed9d5d-5e7c-40f4-9d50-9c4e887e9239 · outbound

This paper cites Bourdieu, The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Bourdieu, The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field

Reference 43

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:13.583973Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 0c4f63b6-237f-46be-b5f3-65c30208fc6e · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work

Reference 44

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:13.337730Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 6cc5ad25-a606-4e1a-9925-4c20276a805a · outbound

This paper cites 73, 02009 (2025).

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions 73, 02009 (2025)

Reference 45

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:13.116190Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 18900d17-a698-44e0-b39a-bf35f6801bb7 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work

Reference 46

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:12.919151Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 16673f08-aaf3-4663-a000-788a9dafce7b · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work

Reference 47

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:12.654276Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation ca7bbf69-e331-4808-8a6e-77d65efa6ccd · outbound

This paper cites Fabiano et al., How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Fabiano et al., How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools

Reference 48

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:12.423553Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation a1341417-3b99-4144-bc35-36ef6d28e70f · outbound

This paper cites Alshami et al., Harnessing the power of ChatGPT for automating systematic review process: Methodology, case study, limitations, and future directions.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Alshami et al., Harnessing the power of ChatGPT for automating systematic review process: Methodology, case study, limitations, and future directions

Reference 49

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:12.254653Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Observation 929d260a-47a7-456c-a041-448f2cd4f22d · outbound

This paper cites very strict regulation.

The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions very strict regulation

Reference 50

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:12.030244Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.