Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

MASTER OT J072007.30+451611.6: A Polar with Strong Optical Variability and Suppressed He II Emission

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read MASTER OT J072007.30+451611.6 is a polar: Doppler tomography shows magnetically channelled accretion from the L1 point with no disk, and the He II/H-beta ratio stays near 0.2 in the high state.

desk verdict Solid new data on a suspected polar, but the 'unambiguous' classification claim overstates what the Doppler tomography can prove given assumed system parameters. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08907 v1 pith:CE6WZ6Z4 submitted 2025-07-11 astro-ph.SR

A. V. Bobakov , S. V. Zharikov , A. V. Karpova , D. A. Zyuzin , A. Yu. Kirichenko , Yu. A. Shibanov , R. Karimov , N. L. Vaidman
show 3 more authors
Sh. T. Nurmakhametova M. R. Gilfanov R. Michel
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords cataclysmicvariablespolarsAMHerculisstarsmagneticwhitedwarfsaccretionstreamsDopplertomographyhigh/lowstatesMASTEROTJ072007.30+451611.6
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to settle the nature of the transient optical source MASTER OT J072007.30+451611.6, which brightens and fades by about three magnitudes every 1.507 hours. Using new multiband photometry, 19 years of archival survey data, GTC spectroscopy, and eROSITA X-ray data, it argues that the object is a polar: a magnetic cataclysmic variable in which the white dwarf's strong field funnels a stream of gas from the companion directly onto the magnetic pole, with no accretion disk. The key evidence is Doppler tomography, which separates the H-alpha emission into a narrow component from the L1 point and a broad component from the stream-magnetosphere interaction; the paper takes this as unambiguous rejection of the alternative 'spider pulsar' interpretation. The system also shows an unusually weak He II 4686 line relative to H-beta, with an average equivalent-width ratio of about 0.2, below the usual criterion for magnetic cataclysmic variables, plus year-long high and low brightness states and an X-ray spectrum consistent with polars. If correct, J0720 is a high-state polar that does not satisfy the standard He II line-ratio criterion for magnetic cataclysmic variables.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is Doppler tomography in velocity space, implemented with a maximum entropy method, which maps where line emission originates relative to the Roche lobes and the modelled ballistic and magnetic trajectories. To feed this map, the paper fits each Balmer line profile with two Gaussians, a narrow and a broad component, and fits their radial-velocity curves with sine functions; the phase offset of about 0.25 between the two components pinpoints the narrow emission at the L1 point and the broad emission at the stream-magnetosphere impact region. A secondary diagnostic is the standard line-ratio criterion for magnetic cataclysmic variables, EW(He II 4686)/EW(H-beta) greater than 0.4 with EW(H-beta) above 20 angstroms, which the paper uses to frame the suppressed He II as an anomaly that needs explanation.

What would settle it

Take high-resolution phase-resolved spectropolarimetry of J0720 in a low accretion state and search for Zeeman-split absorption lines or cyclotron humps; their absence at sensitivity sufficient to rule out a tens-of-megagauss field, combined with a Gaia parallax that makes the assumed M5V donor and 0.8-solar-mass white dwarf inconsistent with the observed fluxes, would undermine the polar interpretation. A deep radio search that detects millisecond pulsar pulses would likewise settle the spider-pulsar alternative.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that J0720 is an AM Herculis-type polar. In this class of close binary, the white dwarf's magnetic field, typically tens of megagauss, prevents an accretion disk from forming, so matter leaves the donor star through the L1 point, falls ballistically, and is then channelled along field lines onto a hot spot near the magnetic pole. The paper establishes this geometry by Doppler tomography of the H-alpha line: the narrow spectral component maps to a compact bright region at the L1 point, and the broad component maps to an extended region between the ballistic stream and the white dwarf's Roche lobe. The same stream geometry is found for the other Balmer and He I lines, while the He II 4686 map shows no L1 spot. Together with the 1.506928-hour period, the archival high and low states, and a thermal-plasma X-ray spectrum, this leads the authors to conclude that J0720 is a polar and that the spider pulsar interpretation is rejected. The paper also documents an anomaly: the EW(He II 4686)/EW(H-beta) ratio stays below 0.4 at every orbital phase, averaging about 0.2, which is unusually low for a high-state polar and violates the standard magnetic-CV criterion.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion depends on assuming the white dwarf's mass is about 0.8 solar masses, the average for magnetic cataclysmic variables, and on assuming the narrow emission line originates at the L1 point, because J0720 has no measured white dwarf mass, no parallax, no eclipse, and no Zeeman or cyclotron detection; if either assumption is wrong, the derived geometry and the strength of the polar claim shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • J0720's 1.507-hour modulation becomes an orbital effect tied to the rotating accretion spot on the white dwarf, not to irradiation by a pulsar wind, so the light curve can be modelled geometrically to recover spot and donor properties.
  • The He II/H-beta ratio of about 0.2 in the high state shows that the standard line-ratio criterion is not necessary for a polar classification, and that low He II can occur during active accretion.
  • The 19-year record of high and low states matches the accretion-rate switching expected in polars; catching J0720 in a low state would let observers isolate the donor star and measure its spectral type.
  • The eROSITA thermal-plasma spectrum and the X-ray-to-optical flux ratio fall in the range seen for polars, so future phase-resolved X-ray observations can test whether the X-rays share the 1.507-hour modulation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: the characteristic folded light-curve shape, a fast rise, a plateau with flickering lasting about 0.3 of the orbit, then a gradual decline, could be fit with a geometric model of an extended accretion spot plus an irradiated donor hemisphere; this would constrain the spot size and the donor heating fraction even without eclipses.
  • If the suppressed He II line tracks low accretion rate or high cyclotron cooling, then J0720 and the handful of similar objects with ratios below 0.4 may form a subgroup of 'quiet He II' polars that surveys using line-ratio cuts would systematically undercount.
  • The rejection of the spider pulsar interpretation could be tested independently by a deep radio search for millisecond pulsar pulses; a detection would reopen the alternative, while a null result would reinforce the polar case.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multi-wavelength study of the periodic optical transient MASTER OT J072007.30+451611.6, combining optical photometry from several telescopes, GTC spectroscopy, archival survey data spanning 19 years, and SRG/eROSITA X-ray observations. The authors confirm the 1.507-h period, find large-amplitude (~3 mag) orbital modulation and long-term high/low states, decompose the emission lines into narrow and broad components, perform Doppler tomography, and fit an optically thin thermal plasma model to the X-ray spectrum. They conclude that J0720 is a polar with magnetically channelled accretion from an L1 stream, and that this classification 'unambiguously confirms' the polar nature and rejects the spider-pulsar interpretation, despite a low HeII 4686/Hβ equivalent width ratio.

Significance. If the polar classification is correct, J0720 is an unusual high-state polar showing extreme optical variability and a remarkably low HeII 4686/Hβ ratio, possibly a low-field polar. The paper brings together a substantial data set (multi-site photometry, GTC spectroscopy, eROSITA X-rays, long-term light curve) and makes a quantitative attempt to derive system parameters. The authors are careful to note the absence of directly measured white dwarf mass, parallax, and magnetic field indicators. However, the central classification claim rests partly on a circular use of the Doppler tomography, and the paper does not quantify how the assumed parameters affect the conclusions. The work is therefore a useful candidate study rather than a definitive classification.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.4 and Sec. 4] The Doppler tomography does not provide an independent confirmation of the polar classification because the zero phase t0 was treated as a free parameter and 'fixed to locate the emission maximum of the compact region at the L1 point.' Since a Doppler tomogram is invariant under a phase shift, this procedure places the compact component at L1 by construction. The same t0 is then used to define the orbital phase for the photometric and spectroscopic ephemeris (Sec. 3.1), so the alignment is not verified externally. The statement in Sec. 4 that the tomography 'unambiguously confirms its classification as a polar and rejects the spider pulsar interpretation' is therefore an overstatement. The paper should be revised to acknowledge that the tomographic result is a consistency check under the assumed polar parameters, not an unambiguous discriminator, and should discuss what independent observations (e.g., cyclotron humps, Zeeman splitting, pulsations, or X-ray orbital modulation) could break the degeneracy.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, Eqs. (2)-(4)] The derived system parameters and geometry are built on an assumed white dwarf mass M1 = 0.8 Msun and on the Smith & Dhillon (1998) mass-period and radius-period relations. The inclination i = 48°±12° is derived from the narrow-component radial-velocity amplitude under the explicit assumption that this component is formed at the L1 point, and the spot co-latitude β = 28°±10° follows from the assumed i and the duration of the photometric plateau. None of these assumptions is independently tested. If, for example, M1 were 1.4 Msun (as in a spider pulsar) or the narrow component originated closer to the donor's centre of mass, the Roche geometry, i, β, and the interpretation of the accretion stream would all change. The paper should provide a sensitivity analysis showing how the inferred masses, i, and β vary over a plausible range of M1, and should state more prominently that the geometric parameters are provisional.
  3. [Sec. 4 and Table 3] The two-component decomposition of the emission lines is not robust enough to support the L1 identification of the narrow component. For Hβ the narrow-component K is very poorly constrained (173+112−98 km/s), and the separation into broad and narrow Gaussians at the available resolution is described as a 'fit' without a model-selection criterion. The Doppler tomography of the components is therefore built on a potentially insecure decomposition. The authors should demonstrate that the tomographic structure is insensitive to the details of the decomposition (e.g., by using different fitting methods or by checking the residuals), or present the tomography of the total line profile alone.
  4. [Sec. 4] The alternative spider-pulsar interpretation is dismissed too quickly. The two-component emission lines with a phase shift of ~0.25 (Table 3), the large-amplitude orbital modulation, and the X-ray spectrum described by thermal plasma are all qualitatively consistent with an irradiated companion and an intrabinary shock in a spider system. The high/low state transitions are offered as evidence against spiders, but this is not a secure criterion because some spider pulsars show similar optical state changes. The paper should explicitly compare the observed properties to the spider-pulsar scenario with a concrete parameter set, as well as to the polar scenario, and state which observables (e.g., radio pulsation searches, polarimetry, UV light curve) would distinguish them. Without such a comparison, the 'rejects the spider pulsar interpretation' claim is not warranted.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4] There is a duplicated phrase in the text: 'However, J0720 was in the high state during our observations. observations.' This should be corrected.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption does not define the zero phase epoch t0; the reader must search the text to find that t0 = HJD 2460617.620472. Please state this in the caption or refer explicitly to Sec. 3.4.
  3. [Sec. 2.2 / Sec. 3.2] The flux calibration of the GTC spectra and the conversion from observed counts to physical flux units is described only briefly. Since the equivalent widths are a central quantity in the discussion, a bit more detail on the calibration accuracy would be helpful.
  4. [Sec. 4] The paper would benefit from a statement about whether any radio observations of J0720 exist; even an upper limit would help evaluate the spider-pulsar scenario.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Doppler-tomographic 'L1' placement is imposed by the free zero-phase choice and polar-parameter priors, so the 'unambiguous' polar confirmation is partly by construction; core photometric/X-ray evidence remains independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 3.4, Doppler tomography; Sec. 4, Discussion and Conclusions]
    "The zero phase is a free parameter and it was fixed to locate the emission maximum of the compact region at the L1 point, i.e. at the beginning of the ballistic stream, as observed in eclipsing polars (Schwope et al. 1997; Salvi et al. 2002). This gives t0=HJD 2460617.620472. ... The Doppler tomography revealed that J0720 is a system with an accretion stream instead of a disk which unambiguously confirms its classification as a polar and rejects the 'spider' pulsar interpretation."

    Because t0 is described as a free parameter, the tomogram can be phase-rotated arbitrarily. Fixing t0 to place the compact emission maximum at L1 makes the later statement that the narrow component 'corresponds to the compact bright region at the L1 point' true by construction rather than by independent measurement. The claimed 'unambiguous' confirmation of an accretion stream and rejection of the spider interpretation therefore rests in part on an imposed coordinate convention, not on a detected spatial coincidence.

  2. self definitional [Sec. 3.3, System parameters; Sec. 3.4, Doppler tomography]
    "Assuming that the Hα narrow component is formed near the tip of the Roche lobe (L1 point), given its RV semi-amplitude (Table 3) and the masses of the components we estimate the system inclination to be i=48°±12°. ... The Roche lobe of the secondary and the primary, the positions of centres of mass of stars and the system, and the ballistic trajectory of the accreted matter are calculated using the system parameters."

    The inclination i=48° is derived by assuming the narrow component is formed at L1. The same i, together with M1=0.8 Msun taken from the mCV average and M2 from the Smith & Dhillon relations, is then used to compute the Roche-lobe and ballistic-stream overlay on which the identification of the compact region with L1 and the accretion stream relies. Thus the geometric map presented as revealing the accretion stream is built from the very polar-L1 assumption it is used to confirm; no alternative spider-model geometry (neutron-star mass, very low-mass companion) is constructed or tested.

full rationale

The paper's photometric and X-ray content is genuinely independent: the 1.506928 h period, ~3 mag orbital modulation, high/low states over ~19 yr, thermal-plasma X-ray spectrum, and low EW(He II)/EW(H beta) ratio are all measured from data and support a magnetic-CV interpretation. The circularity is confined to the Doppler-tomography chain that is claimed to 'unambiguously' confirm the polar classification and reject spiders. The zero phase is explicitly a free parameter fixed to place the compact emission maximum at L1, and the system parameters (M1=0.8 Msun, M2, i=48 deg) used to draw the Roche-lobe and ballistic-stream overlay are themselves derived by assuming the narrow component is at L1 and that the source is a polar. Consequently, the 'narrow component at L1' and 'accretion stream' readings of the tomogram are partly by construction rather than independent discoveries. The self-citation to Bobakov et al. (2024) in the Introduction is only an example of spider pulsars and is not load-bearing. Score 6: one or more of the confirming 'predictions' reduce by construction, but the central classification still has substantial independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper derives system parameters from externally calibrated empirical relations and an assumed WD mass, plus one phase convention chosen to match the preferred interpretation. No new physical entities are proposed. The listed free parameters materially affect the quoted masses, inclination, distance, and accretion rate.

free parameters (3)
  • White dwarf mass M1 = 0.8 M_sun (assumed)
    Adopted as the average mCV mass from Shaw et al. (2020) in Sec. 3.3. It drives M2, R2, mass ratio, inclination, co-latitude, and the Doppler tomogram geometry, with no independent measurement for J0720.
  • Orbital zero phase t0 = HJD 2460617.620472
    Chosen so the compact Doppler map emission lies at L1 (Sec. 3.4). This choice underlies the narrow-component-at-L1 claim and the RV phase shifts used to support it.
  • Donor spectral type for distance = M5V
    Assigned as the brightest plausible type for M2 = 0.09 M_sun and R2 = 0.17 R_sun (Sec. 4), used to estimate distance ~400 pc and accretion rate.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Smith & Dhillon (1998) mass-period and radius-period relations apply to J0720.
    Used in Sec. 3.3 to convert the 1.507-hour period into M2 = 0.09 M_sun and R2 = 0.17 R_sun. If the donor is not a normal low-mass main-sequence-like star, these quantities and all derived geometry change.
  • domain assumption Narrow emission lines form near the inner Lagrange point and broad lines near the WD magnetosphere accretion region.
    Standard polar interpretation cited from Schwope et al. (2011). Without it, the assignment of RV components to physical sites and the inclination estimate lose their basis.
  • domain assumption The secondary star dominates the red optical flux in the low state.
    Used in Sec. 4 to estimate distance from the low-state magnitude. If the WD or accretion stream still contributes at low state, the distance and Mdot estimates are biased.
  • domain assumption The mekal thermal plasma model with fixed NH from reddening describes the X-ray emission.
    Sec. 3.5. With 79 net counts the model is not uniquely constrained, and alternative emission mechanisms cannot be excluded.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MASTER OT J072007.30+451611.6: A Polar with Strong Optical Variability and Suppressed He II Emission." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CE6WZ6Z4

@misc{pith2026250708907,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MASTER OT J072007.30+451611.6: A Polar with Strong Optical Variability and Suppressed He II Emission},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CE6WZ6Z4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08907}
}
abstract

The transient optical source MASTER OT J072007.30+451611.6 has been recently discovered and proposed as a peculiar polar with an unusually high amplitude of the orbital brightness variation in the optical of $\sim$3 mag. To clarify its nature, we performed multiband time-series optical photometry with 1.5-m class telescopes and spectroscopy with the 10.4-m Gran Telescopio Canarias. We also analysed archival data of different optical surveys and detected the source in X-rays with the Spectrum-RG/eROSITA telescope. We confirm the orbital period of $\approx$1.5 h with the high amplitude of the brightness modulation. Compiling survey data, covering $\sim$19 yr, we find high and low brightness states of the object at time scales of years, likely explained by different accretion rates. Our data were obtained in the high brightness state. Optical spectra with hydrogen and helium emission lines, consisting of broad and narrow components, indicate the presence of an accretion stream without disk. The Doppler tomography shows that the narrow component is mainly emitted from the Lagrangian L$_1$ point, while the broad component is from the region where the accretion stream interacts with the white dwarf magnetosphere. The ratio of equivalent widths of HeII 4686 and H$\beta$ emission lines is $<$0.4, which is curiously low for polars. The X-ray spectrum of the source can be described by the thermal plasma emission model with parameters consistent with values observed for polars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.08907 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. J0720 light curves obtained from the CSS, Pan-STARRS and ZTF data, demonstrating changes between high and low brightness states. Data from different surveys and bands are shown by various symbols as indicated in the legend (PS = Pan-STARRS). 5 10 15 20 Frequency [d−1 ] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Power 1.5065 1.5070 1.5075 Period [h] 0.0 0.2 0.4 Power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Lomb-Scargle periodogram calculated for the ZTF data in the 𝑟 band. The best period corresponding to the highest peak, enlarged in the inset, is indicated by the dashed line. 1982) analysis to search for periodicity in the 𝑟-band ZTF data, which spans over six years and contains about 800 measurements. The resulting power spectrum is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Light curves of J0720 folded with the period of 1.506928 h. Data from different instruments are marked with different symbols as indicated in the legends. ZTF and ATO measurements, as well as magnitudes obtained from the GTC spectra in the AB system, are presented in the left panels, while MAO and OAN-SPM measurements in the Vega system – in the right panels. Two periods are shown for clarity. The zero phase was sel… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Optical spectra of J0720 obtained at different orbital phases with the GTC using R1000B (orange and blue), R2000B (red) and R2500R (green) grisms. Δ𝜙𝑖 is the phase shift relative to the time 𝑡0. The results for H𝛼 and H𝛽 lines are presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Trailed spectra of J0720 obtained with R2000B (top) and R2500R (bottom) grisms. Two orbital cycles are presented for clarity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Profiles of two Balmer lines (two upper rows) and He (two lower rows) spectral lines at different orbital phases 𝜙 indicated in the panels. The black points with error bars show continuum-subtracted data. In each panel, the red solid line is the best-fitting double-Gau…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Variations of the best-fitting parameters for the H𝛼 line profiles obtained with the double Gaussian model with the orbital phase. The top panel shows FWHMs in units of km s−1 , the middle panel – continuum-subtracted intensities in units of 10−17 erg cm−2 s −1 Å −1 , …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Trailed spectra of H𝛼 (top) and H𝛽 (bottom) emission line and the results of their fitting. Two orbital cycles are presented for clarity. From left to right: data, the broad component fit, the narrow component fit, the combination of the two components, and the residua…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Doppler tomography of the H𝛼 line (bottom) and its components (top). The left panels demonstrate the standard Doppler tomograms while the right panels – the inside-out projections. The Roche lobes of the WD and companion (black dashed and solid closed lines, respective…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Left and middle panels: Doppler tomography of the He ii 4686 line. The left panel demonstrates the standard Doppler tomogram, while the middle panel – the inside-out projection. The designations are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: EWs of the He ii 4686 vs H𝛽 emission lines for different polars in high and low states (orange and dark-red points). The blue area corresponds to the Silber’s criterion for mCVs. The grey region near the low-left corner shows the J0720 position at different orbital ph…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Equivalent widths of the He ii 4686 (red dots) and H𝛽 (blue dots; top) emission lines, their ratio (middle) and intensity of spectra in the 𝑔 band (bottom) vs orbital phase. the transformation equation 𝑟 = 𝑉 − 0.49(𝐵 − 𝑉) + 0.11 (Fukugita et al. 1996) with the colour …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cataclysmic variables from SRG/eROSITA: new systems from eRASS1

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Random Forest plus Gaia/eROSITA match yields 156 spectroscopically confirmed CVs from eRASS1, spanning subtypes, periods, and luminosities, with the method outperforming several published alternatives.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A., 1996, in Jacoby G

    Arnaud K. A., 1996, in Jacoby G. H., Barnes J., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V. p. 17

    1996

  2. [2]

    C., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038598 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...645A..56B 645, A56

    Beuermann K., Burwitz V., Reinsch K., Schwope A., Thomas H. C., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038598 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...645A..56B 645, A56

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038598 2021

  3. [3]

    V., Kirichenko A

    Bobakov A. V., Kirichenko A. Y., Zharikov S. V., Karpova A. V., Zyuzin D. A., Shibanov Y. A., Mennickent R. E., Garcia- \'A lvarez D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450205 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...690A.173B 690, A173

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450205 2024

  4. [4]

    Brunner H., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141266 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...661A...1B 661, A1

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141266 2022

  5. [5]

    Cropper M., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/231.3.597 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988MNRAS.231..597C 231, 597

    doi:10.1093/mnras/231.3.597 1988

  6. [6]

    Cropper M., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1007/BF00177799 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990SSRv...54..195C 54, 195

    doi:10.1007/bf00177799 1990

  7. [7]

    C., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/257.3.476 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.257..476D 257, 476

    Davey S., Smith R. C., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/257.3.476 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.257..476D 257, 476

    doi:10.1093/mnras/257.3.476 1992

  8. [8]

    Denisenko D., 2018, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ATel11626....1D 11626, 1

    work page 2018

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    W., Filippenko A

    Draghis P., Romani R. W., Filippenko A. V., Brink T. G., Zheng W., Halpern J. P., Camilo F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab378b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...883..108D 883, 108

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    J., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/870 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696..870D 696, 870

    Drake A. J., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/870 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696..870D 696, 870

    2009 doi

  3. [11]

    A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abb82d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..251....7F 251, 7

    Flewelling H. A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abb82d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..251....7F 251, 7

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    u ver T., \

    Foight D. R., G \"u ver T., \"O zel F., Slane P. O., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/66 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...826...66F 826, 66

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific] 10.1086/670067 , 125, 306–312

    Foreman-Mackey D., Hogg D. W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific] 10.1086/670067 , 125, 306–312

    2013 doi

  6. [14]

    T., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1759 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.2382F 462, 2382

    Fuchs J. T., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1759 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.2382F 462, 2382

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    E., Doi M., Shimasaku K., Schneider D

    Fukugita M., Ichikawa T., Gunn J. E., Doi M., Shimasaku K., Schneider D. P., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/117915 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996AJ....111.1748F 111, 1748

    1996 doi

  8. [16]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...595A...1G 595, A1

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A...1G 674, A1

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Galiullin I., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450734 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...690A.374G 690, A374

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    M., Schlafly E., Zucker C., Speagle J

    Green G. M., Schlafly E., Zucker C., Speagle J. S., Finkbeiner D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...887...93G 887, 93

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    E., Ward M

    Griffiths R. E., Ward M. J., Blades J. C., Wilson A. S., Chaisson L., Johnston M. D., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/183030 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...232L..27G 232, L27

    1979 doi

  13. [21]

    C., Raj A., Singh K

    Joshi A., Pandey J. C., Raj A., Singh K. P., Anupama G. C., Singh H. P., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491..201J 491, 201

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    C., Rawat N., Raj A., Wang W., Singh H

    Joshi A., Pandey J. C., Rawat N., Raj A., Wang W., Singh H. P., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac6026 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....163..221J 163, 221

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    K., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16063.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.403..755K 403, 755

    Kafka S., Tappert C., Honeycutt R. K., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16063.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.403..755K 403, 755

    2010

  16. [24]

    I., et al., 2024, @doi [Astronomy Letters] 10.1134/S1063773724700154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AstL...50..335K 50, 335

    Kolbin A. I., et al., 2024, @doi [Astronomy Letters] 10.1134/S1063773724700154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AstL...50..335K 50, 335

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    J., Potter S

    Kotze E. J., Potter S. B., McBride V. A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629120 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...595A..47K 595, A47

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    W., Liebert J., Steiner J

    Latham D. W., Liebert J., Steiner J. E., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/158985 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...246..919L 246, 919

    1981 doi

  19. [27]

    A., Osterheld A

    Liedahl D. A., Osterheld A. L., Goldstein W. H., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187729 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...438L.115L 438, L115

    1995 doi

  20. [28]

    Lin J., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202452177 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...694A.112L 694, A112

    2025 doi

  21. [29]

    L., Thorstensen J

    Liu Y., Hwang H.-C., Zakamska N. L., Thorstensen J. R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1156 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.522.2719L 522, 2719

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    R., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1007/BF00648343 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976Ap&SS..39..447L 39, 447

    Lomb N. R., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1007/BF00648343 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976Ap&SS..39..447L 39, 447

    1976 doi

  23. [31]

    R., Horne K., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/235.1.269 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988MNRAS.235..269M 235, 269

    Marsh T. R., Horne K., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/235.1.269 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988MNRAS.235..269M 235, 269

    1988 doi

  24. [32]

    J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASP..131a8003M 131, 018003

    Masci F. J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASP..131a8003M 131, 018003

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    Mata S \'a nchez D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad203 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.tmp..227M 520, 2217

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    Mewe R., Gronenschild E. H. B. M., van den Oord G. H. J., 1985, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985A&AS...62..197M 62, 197

    1985

  27. [35]

    R., van den Oord G

    Mewe R., Lemen J. R., van den Oord G. H. J., 1986, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986A&AS...65..511M 65, 511

    1986

  28. [36]

    S., Rodrigues C

    Oliveira A. S., Rodrigues C. V., Cieslinski D., Jablonski F. J., Silva K. M. G., Almeida L. A., Rodr \' guez-Ardila A., Palhares M. S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa610d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....153..144O 153, 144

    2017 doi

  29. [37]

    S., Rodrigues C

    Oliveira A. S., Rodrigues C. V., Martins M., Palhares M. S., Silva K. M. G., Lima I. J., Jablonski F. J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab6ded , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....159..114O 159, 114

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    Pogrosheva T., et al., 2018, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ATel11620....1P 11620, 1

    2018

  31. [39]

    Predehl P., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039313 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...647A...1P 647, A1

    2021 doi

  32. [40]

    X., et al., 2020a, pypeit/PypeIt: Release 1.0.0 , @doi 10.5281/zenodo.3743493

    Prochaska J. X., et al., 2020a, pypeit/PypeIt: Release 1.0.0 , @doi 10.5281/zenodo.3743493

    doi

  33. [41]

    X., et al., 2020b, @doi [Journal of Open Source Software] 10.21105/joss.02308 , 5, 2308

    Prochaska J. X., et al., 2020b, @doi [Journal of Open Source Software] 10.21105/joss.02308 , 5, 2308

    doi

  34. [42]

    B., Buckley D

    Romero-Colmenero E., Potter S. B., Buckley D. A. H., Barrett P. E., Vrielmann S., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06209.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.339..685R 339, 685

    2003

  35. [43]

    Salvi N., Ramsay G., Cropper M., Buckley D. A. H., Stobie R. S., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05216.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.331..488S 331, 488

    2002

  36. [44]

    D., Read A

    Saxton R. D., Read A. M., Esquej P., Freyberg M. J., Altieri B., Bermejo D., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20079193 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...480..611S 480, 611

    2008 doi

  37. [45]

    D., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160554 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...263..835S 263, 835

    Scargle J. D., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160554 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...263..835S 263, 835

    1982 doi

  38. [46]

    D., Mantel K

    Schwope A. D., Mantel K. H., Horne K., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9701094 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A&A...319..894S 319, 894

    1997 doi arXiv

  39. [47]

    D., Horne K., Steeghs D., Still M., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201016373 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...531A..34S 531, A34

    Schwope A. D., Horne K., Steeghs D., Still M., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201016373 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...531A..34S 531, A34

    2011 doi

  40. [48]

    Schwope A. D., Knauff K., Kurpas J., Salvato M., Stelzer B., St \"u tz L., Tub \' n-Arenas D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450537 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...690A.243S 690, A243

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    W., Reinsch K., Beuermann K., Misselt K

    Shafter A. W., Reinsch K., Beuermann K., Misselt K. A., Buckley D. A. H., Burwitz V., Schwope A. D., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/175527 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...443..319S 443, 319

    1995 doi

  42. [50]

    W., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2592 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498.3457S 498, 3457

    Shaw A. W., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2592 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498.3457S 498, 3457

    2020 doi

  43. [51]

    D., 1992, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Silber A. D., 1992, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    1992

  44. [52]

    P., et al., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309755 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...453L..95S 453, L95

    Singh K. P., et al., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309755 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...453L..95S 453, L95

    1995 doi

  45. [53]

    A., Dhillon V

    Smith D. A., Dhillon V. S., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.02065.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.301..767S 301, 767

    1998

  46. [54]

    C., 1998, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9806141 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998astro.ph..6141S pp astro--ph/9806141

    Spruit H. C., 1998, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9806141 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998astro.ph..6141S pp astro--ph/9806141

    1998 doi arXiv

  47. [55]

    Sunyaev R., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141179 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...656A.132S 656, A132

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    J., Strader J., Chomiuk L., Aydi E., Sokolovsky K

    Swihart S. J., Strader J., Chomiuk L., Aydi E., Sokolovsky K. V., Ray P. S., Kerr M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aca2ac , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...941..199S 941, 199

    2022 doi

  49. [57]

    137, Wild Stars in the Old West

    Szkody P., 1998, in Howell S., Kuulkers E., Woodward C., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 137, Wild Stars in the Old West. p. 18

    1998

  50. [58]

    C., Reinsch K., 1996, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&A...315L...1T 315, L1

    Thomas H. C., Reinsch K., 1996, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&A...315L...1T 315, L1

    1996

  51. [59]

    H., Greiner J., Zickgraf F

    Tovmassian G. H., Greiner J., Zickgraf F. J., Kroll P., Krautter J., Thiering I., Zharykov S. V., Serrano A., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9609166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A&A...328..571T 328, 571

    1997 doi arXiv

  52. [60]

    F., 1986, Soviet Astronomy Letters, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986SvAL...12..196V 12, 196

    Voikhanskaya N. F., 1986, Soviet Astronomy Letters, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986SvAL...12..196V 12, 196

    1986

  53. [61]

    Wachter K., Leach R., Kellogg E., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157084 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...230..274W 230, 274

    1979 doi

  54. [62]

    Wilms J., Allen A., McCray R., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...542..914W 542, 914

    2000 doi

  55. [63]

    L., et al., 2019, AllWISE Source Catalog , NASA IPAC DataSet, IRSA1, @doi 10.26131/IRSA1

    Wright E. L., et al., 2019, AllWISE Source Catalog , NASA IPAC DataSet, IRSA1, @doi 10.26131/IRSA1

    2019 doi

  56. [64]

    Zhao G., Zhao Y.-H., Chu Y.-Q., Jing Y.-P., Deng L.-C., 2012, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/12/7/002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012RAA....12..723Z 12, 723

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.