Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 8 minor 41 references

The Snake Filament: A study of polarization and kinematics

T0 review · 4 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The Snake filament's magnetic field is parallel at its ends and perpendicular at its dense center, with gas accreting inward.

desk verdict First solid case study of the Snake filament with new polarimetry, but the claimed parallel-to-perpendicular field transition is probably not established because the PRS analysis never separates a physical reorientation from the projection of a uniform field onto an S-shaped spine. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10083 v1 pith:MNEXMR3Q submitted 2025-07-14 astro-ph.GA

Farideh S. Tabatabaei , Elena Redaelli , Gabriel A. P. Franco , Paola Caselli , Marta Obolentseva This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords magneticfieldspolarizationmolecularcloudsfilamentsstarformationBarnard72PipeNebulaISMkinematicsanddynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the Snake filament (Barnard 72), a quiescent and starless filament at $154\,\mathrm{pc}$ near the Pipe Nebula, is shaped and stabilized by an ordered magnetic field. Combining optical and near-infrared starlight polarization with submillimeter dust polarization and $^{13}\mathrm{CO}$/$\mathrm{C}^{18}\mathrm{O}$ line maps, the authors find the projected magnetic field runs parallel to the filament's spine at the low-density ends and becomes perpendicular near the dense center. The molecular gas shows a velocity gradient from both ends toward the center, which they interpret as accretion channeled by the field, and the filament's mass per length ($14.4\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$) sits below the critical value ($31.3\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$), consistent with the absence of star formation. If the picture holds, the Snake is a pre-stellar filament where magnetic geometry, kinematics, and stability all point the same way: fields guide material inward while keeping the cloud from collapsing.

What carries the argument

The analysis is carried by three matched probes: R-band and H-band starlight polarization, whose position angles are taken to trace the plane-of-sky magnetic field; submillimeter polarized dust emission at 353 GHz, rotated by $90^\circ$ to give the field orientation; and $^{13}\mathrm{CO}(1$--$0)$ and $\mathrm{C}^{18}\mathrm{O}(1$--$0)$ spectra for gas kinematics. The quantitative bridge between field and filament is the Projected Rayleigh Statistic (PRS), which tests at each position along the spine whether projected polarization angles cluster parallel (positive PRS) or perpendicular (negative PRS) to the local spine tangent. Stability is decided by comparing the filament's mass per length to the critical value $465\,(\sigma_{\rm tot}/1\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}})^2\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$ with $\sigma_{\rm tot}$ including thermal and non-thermal motions; the mass comes from extinction converted through $N(\mathrm{H}_2) = 9.4\times10^{20}\,A_V\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}\,mag^{-1}}$.

What would settle it

Bin the same background stars by the catalog's distance estimates in 20 pc slices across the 154 pc peak and compare their polarization angles and visual extinctions: the single-cloud picture requires a sharp jump in $A_V$ and a clear angular change at the cloud distance, with foreground stars essentially unpolarized, so a smooth rise or unchanged angles would falsify the field-geometry claim; a deep 21 cm or CO survey revealing any second cloud between 0.2 and 2 kpc would do the same.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central result is a geometric one: the plane-of-sky magnetic field of the Snake is predominantly parallel to the filament spine at both ends, as measured by positive Projected Rayleigh Statistic values, and becomes predominantly perpendicular near the central, denser region, where the PRS turns negative. The accompanying kinematics show velocities increasing from west to east in both $^{13}\mathrm{CO}$ and $\mathrm{C}^{18}\mathrm{O}$, with the denser $\mathrm{C}^{18}\mathrm{O}$ gas narrow and transonic (linewidths $0.1$--$0.2\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$) while $^{13}\mathrm{CO}$ shows two velocity components at the center; the paper reads this as gas accreting toward the center. The filament is judged stable: $M/L = 14.4\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$ versus a critical $31.3\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$, and no young stellar objects are found. Polarization efficiency $p_{\rm pol}/A_V$ declines with extinction with fitted slopes of $-0.73$ (optical) and $-0.75$ (NIR), which the authors attribute to reduced radiative grain alignment in denser gas.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Snake filament is the only significant dust cloud along the line of sight out to 2 kpc, so the extinction and polarization of every background star trace the Snake alone.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Snake is a nearby ($154 \pm 15$ pc) quiescent filament whose magnetic field is ordered on parsec scales, offering a clean laboratory for studying fields before star formation begins.
  • The parallel field at the ends plus the velocity gradient toward the center implies the field is currently guiding low-density gas inward, while the perpendicular central field indicates the morphology is reshaped where density is highest.
  • A subcritical mass-to-length ratio ($14.4$ below $31.3\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$) means the filament should not collapse radially, which directly explains the absence of young stellar objects in the region.
  • The decline of polarization efficiency with extinction (slopes about $-0.73$ to $-0.75$) means depolarization is a generic feature of the Snake's dense gas, whether caused by weaker grain alignment or by line-of-sight field tangling.
  • The narrow, transonic $\mathrm{C}^{18}\mathrm{O}$ line and the double-component $^{13}\mathrm{CO}$ in the center are consistent with a gentle, ongoing accretion flow rather than turbulence-driven disruption.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the accretion interpretation is correct, the Snake is a resolved example of the field-alignment transition seen in larger Gould Belt samples, and Zeeman or high-resolution submillimeter polarization toward the center could test whether the perpendicular field there is strong enough to provide the extra support the stability argument assumes.
  • The single-cloud assumption is testable with the catalog distances used in the paper: binning stars by distance in slices around 154 pc should show a sharp jump in extinction and a change in polarization angle at the cloud, while foreground stars should be nearly unpolarized; a smooth rise would reveal contamination by an unseen cloud.
  • The measured west-to-east velocity gradient can be converted into a mass accretion rate onto the central region using the column density at each end; this rate, which the paper does not compute, would connect the Snake's kinematics to core-formation timescales in quiescent filaments.
  • Because the Snake's central extinctions are modest, the data cannot test whether a second parallel-alignment transition near $A_V \sim 21$ mag, seen in other clouds, also occurs here; deeper NIR or submillimeter polarization would be the direct check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper presents new optical and near-infrared starlight polarization observations of the Snake filament (Barnard 72), combined with archival Planck submillimeter polarization and IRAM 13CO/C18O molecular line data. Using a 3D extinction map, the authors place the filament at 154 pc and argue it is the dominant dust structure along the line of sight within 2 kpc. They compute the Projected Rayleigh Statistic (PRS) along the filament spine and report that the magnetic field is parallel to the spine at the filament's ends and perpendicular near its dense center. The molecular line data show a velocity gradient from west to east, interpreted as accretion toward the center. The polarization efficiency decreases with visual extinction, and the mass-per-unit-length of 14.4 Msun/pc is below the critical 31.3 Msun/pc, leading the authors to conclude the filament is stable against collapse and that the magnetic field plays a central role in guiding gas along the filament.

Significance. The observational dataset is valuable: the Snake is an understudied filament, and the combination of optical/near-IR starlight polarimetry, Planck dust polarization, and IRAM line maps provides a rare multi-wavelength view. The mass-to-length stability analysis, the absence of YSOs, and the velocity gradient are useful observational constraints. The main weakness is that the paper's central magnetic-field geometry claim is not yet established: the PRS analysis does not control for the degeneracy between a uniform plane-of-sky field and a curved spine, and no statistical significance is reported for the parallel/perpendicular transition. If the PRS concerns are addressed, the paper would make a solid contribution to the understanding of magnetic fields in quiescent filaments.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.3, Eq. (3) and Fig. 6] The claimed transition from parallel to perpendicular field orientation along the spine is not established because the PRS is degenerate with a uniform plane-of-sky magnetic field projected onto the S-shaped spine. The global optical polarization angle peaks around 85-102 deg (Fig. 4), consistent with a single prevailing field direction, while the spine tangent rotates along the filament. Under a fixed field direction, PRS will be positive where the local tangent is nearly aligned with that direction and negative where it is nearly orthogonal, without any physical change in field geometry. To rule out this null model, please plot the absolute magnetic field position angle as a function of position along the spine, or compute the PRS expected for a constant polarization angle equal to the global mean and compare it to the observed PRS. Without such a test, the statement that the field 'becomes more perpendicular' near the dense center is not supported.
  2. [Section 3.3, Fig. 6] No statistical significance is reported for the local PRS values. The error bars in Eq. (4) are uncertainties, but the paper does not state which spine positions have PRS significantly above or below zero, nor does it give p-values or confidence levels for the parallel and perpendicular regions. The robustness check with a smaller radius shows that 9% of positions change sign, but it does not indicate whether these are in the regions used to claim the transition. Please report the number of vectors n entering each PRS calculation, significance thresholds, and a clear statement of how many spine positions support each part of the claim.
  3. [Section 4.2 and Fig. 11] The functional form of the polarization-efficiency fits is inconsistent. The text says the scatter plots are in log-log space, but the fitted equations are written as ppol/AV = -0.73 log AV + 0.04 (with a similar equation for NIR), which is a linear relation in ppol/AV versus log AV. If the intended relation is log(ppol/AV) = -0.73 log AV + const, the equations and figure axes must be corrected, and the slopes should be compared with the power-law indices alpha from Alves et al. (2014), Redaelli et al. (2019), and Tabatabaei et al. (2024). As written, the comparison to a power-law slope is not valid.
  4. [Sections 2.4 and 3.1] The assumption that the Snake is the only significant dust structure along the line of sight within 2 kpc is load-bearing, because all polarization vectors are interpreted as tracing the Snake's magnetic field. The supporting evidence is the 3D extinction map up to 1.25 kpc and the flat mean polarization trend beyond 154 pc, but the extinction map does not cover the full 2 kpc range, and a cloud with a similar polarization angle distribution would not be detected by the mean polarization percentage. Please add a direct test, such as the polarization angle distribution of stars binned by distance (foreground, within, and behind the Snake), or an explicit comparison of the extinction and polarization signatures expected for an additional cloud.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Section 2.1] The rest frequencies of C18O and 13CO are given as 110.201354 MHz and 109.782173 MHz, but the J=1-0 transitions of these species occur at approximately 110 and 109 GHz; the units should be GHz.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract contains the garbled phrase 'in or close to the Pipe Nebula s neighboring'; please rephrase this sentence.
  3. [Section 3.3] The code/package name is spelled inconsistently as 'radfill' and 'radfil'; please use the correct name (radfil) throughout.
  4. [Sections 3.3 and 4.1] Section 3.3 reports a filament length of 2.3 pc, while Section 4.1 uses 2.4 pc in the mass calculation; please make these consistent.
  5. [Section 3.4 and Appendix A] The sound speed is denoted cc in Section 3.4 and cs in Appendix A; please use a single notation.
  6. [Section 3.5 and Appendix A] Section 3.5 adopts Tex = 16 K, whereas Appendix A uses Td = 15 K for the same region; please clarify the relationship between these temperatures.
  7. [Section 4.2] In the fit equations, the error on the intercept is not stated; please include full parameter uncertainties.
  8. [Section 3.3, Eq. (4)] The PRS uncertainty formula is given without a specific citation to the corresponding equation in Jow et al. (2018); please add a reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's geometry, kinematic, and stability claims are observational measurements built from independent data; the two self-citations are comparison-only.

full rationale

I find no circular step that reduces a claimed result to its own inputs. The central geometry claim (Sect. 3.3) uses the Projected Rayleigh Statistic of Eq. (3), computed from polarization position angles obtained from optical/NIR starlight polarimetry and Planck dust emission, while the filament spine is derived from the extinction map via fil_finder; these inputs are independent, and the sign of PRS is a measurement rather than a fitted quantity. The kinematic gradient (Sect. 3.4) is derived from independent Gaussian fits to C18O and 13CO spectra. The stability analysis (Sect. 4.1) combines the Av-based column density, the adopted 154 pc distance from the external Edenhofer et al. (2024) 3D dust map, and the observed velocity dispersion; none of these parameters is fitted to force M/L below the critical value. The assumption that the Snake is the dominant structure along the line of sight is an empirical selection stated in Sect. 2.4 and checked with extinction and polarization trends; it is not definitional. The self-citations to Redaelli et al. (2019) and Tabatabaei et al. (2024) appear only as comparison slopes for the polarization-efficiency trend and are not load-bearing for the geometry or kinematics claims. The reviewer concern that a uniform field combined with a curved spine could mimic the PRS pattern is a possible astrophysical degeneracy in interpreting the statistic, but it is not an instance in which the paper's derivation is equivalent to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard dust-polarization assumptions, the adopted distance and background-cloud assumptions, and the stability criterion from the literature. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Optical polarization efficiency slope = -0.73 ± 0.09
    Linear fit of ppol/AV vs log AV for optical data (Sect. 4.2, Fig. 11).
  • Optical polarization efficiency intercept = 0.04
    Intercept of the same optical fit.
  • NIR polarization efficiency slope = -0.75 ± 0.27
    Linear fit of ppol/AV vs log AV for NIR data.
  • NIR polarization efficiency intercept = 0.02
    Intercept of the same NIR fit.
  • PRS spine search radius = 0.04 degrees
    Chosen to cover the full filament; robustness checked at 0.02 degrees with 9% sign changes (Sect. 3.3).
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption The Snake filament is the dominant dust structure along the line of sight within 2 kpc.
    Used to select background stars and interpret polarization and extinction (Sect. 2.4).
  • domain assumption The adopted distance to the Snake filament is 154 pc.
    From the Edenhofer et al. (2024) 3D extinction peak; used for mass and length calculations (Sect. 3.1).
  • standard math Starlight polarization angle traces the plane-of-sky magnetic field orientation.
    Standard assumption in dust polarimetry (Sect. 2.2).
  • standard math Submillimeter polarization is perpendicular to the magnetic field and is rotated by 90 degrees.
    Standard for polarized dust emission (Sect. 2.3).
  • domain assumption The N(H2)-AV conversion factor from Bohlin et al. (1978) holds.
    Used to compute gas column density for the mass estimate (Sect. 4.1).
  • domain assumption External pressure on the filament is negligible.
    Stated assumption for the stability analysis (Sect. 4.1).
  • domain assumption The dust temperature from Herschel (15 K) equals the gas kinetic temperature for the C18O line.
    Used to compute sound speed and opacity (Sect. 3.5, Appendix A).
  • standard math The critical mass-to-length ratio of Hacar et al. (2023) is applicable.
    Adopted from the literature to assess stability (Sect. 4.1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Snake Filament: A study of polarization and kinematics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MNEXMR3Q

@misc{pith2026250710083,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Snake Filament: A study of polarization and kinematics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MNEXMR3Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10083}
}
read the original abstract

The role of magnetic fields in the formation of dense filamentary structures in molecular clouds is critical for understanding the star formation process. The Snake filament in or close to the Pipe Nebula s neighboring, a prominent example of such structures, offers an ideal environment to study the interplay between magnetic fields and gas dynamics in the early stages of star formation. This study aims to investigate how magnetic fields influence the structure and dynamics of the Snake filament, using both polarization data and molecular line observations. Our goal is to understand the role of magnetic fields in shaping the filamentary structure and explore the kinematics within the filament. We conducted polarization observations in the optical and near-infrared bands using the 1.6 m and 60 cm telescopes at the Observatorio do Pico dos Dias/Laboratorio Nacional de Astrof\isica (OPD/LNA). Molecular line observations of the C18O and 13CO lines were obtained using the IRAM 30m telescope. We analyzed the data to characterize polarization and gas properties within the filament, with a focus on understanding the magnetic field orientation and its relationship with the filament s structure. Our findings reveal that the polarization vectors align with the filament s spine, indicating a magnetic field structure that is predominantly parallel to the filament at lower-density regions. A velocity gradient along the filament is observed in both C18O and 13CO lines, with C18O tracing the denser regions of the gas. The polarization efficiency decreases with increasing visual extinction, consistent with reduced grain alignment in higher-density regions. The filament s mass-to-length ratio is below the critical value required for gravitational collapse, indicating stability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10083 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. 2D dust extinction map illustrating the dust distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Top panel: Visual extinction (AV) as a function of the distance of stars within 2 kpc from the Sun. The extinction and distance values are derived from the StarHorse catalog. Lower panel: Polarization percentage as a function of the distance. A vertical dashed line at 154 ± 15 pc marks the distance of the Snake filament. The error bars represent the uncertainties in the extinction and polarization measurements, scal… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Distribution of polarization angles. Histogram of the dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Dust extinction map illustrating the masked filamentary structure. The spine of the filament is outlined by a prominent red curve, while the thin red lines indicate the locations of perpendicular cuts. Blue circles represent peak pixel intensity along each cut. The ora…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: PRS values as a function of RA. The PRS is calculated at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Channel maps between 4.01 and 5.44 km s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Top panel: Centroid velocity map of the C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The PPV plot illustrates the kinematics of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The W1-W2 versus W2-W3 color-color diagram of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: presents the scatter plots of polarization efficiency (ppol/AV) as a function of visual extinction (AV) in log-log space. The optical and NIR datasets are organized into 30 bins, repre￾sented by blue and red points, respectively. The error bars on each data point are …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alves, F. O. & Franco, G. A. P. 2007, A&A, 470, 597

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    O., Frau, P., Girart, J

    Alves, F. O., Frau, P., Girart, J. M., et al. 2014, A&A, 569, L1

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Anders, F., Khalatyan, A., Queiroz, A. B. A., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A91 André, P., Di Francesco, J., Ward-Thompson, D., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther, R. S. Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, & T. Henning, 27–51 André, P., Men’shchikov, A., Bontemps, S., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L102

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Ashby, M. L. N., Hora, J. L., Lakshmipathaiah, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 949, 105

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    C., Savage, B

    Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., & Drake, J. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 132

    1978

  6. [6]

    M., Weiler, M., Jordi, C., et al

    Carrasco, J. M., Weiler, M., Jordi, C., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A86

    2021

  7. [7]

    C., Magnier, E

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560

    arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Corradi, R. L. M., Aznar, R., & Mampaso, A. 1998, MNRAS, 297, 617

    work page 1998

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Crutcher, R. M. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 29

    2012

  2. [10]

    M., Skrutskie, M

    Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al. 2003, 2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources

    2003

  3. [11]

    M., Wright, E

    Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2013, Explanatory Supplement to the AllWISE Data Release Products, Explanatory Supplement to the All- WISE Data Release Products, by R. M. Cutri et al

    2013

  4. [12]

    A., Loinard, L., Ortiz-León, G

    Dzib, S. A., Loinard, L., Ortiz-León, G. N., Rodríguez, L. F., & Galli, P. A. B. 2018, ApJ, 867, 151

    2018

  5. [13]

    2024, A&A, 685, A82

    Edenhofer, G., Zucker, C., Frank, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A82

    2024

  6. [14]

    J., Hacar, A., Clark, S

    Feng, J., Smith, R. J., Hacar, A., Clark, S. E., & Seifried, D. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 6370

    2024

  7. [15]

    Fiege, J. D. & Pudritz, R. E. 2000, MNRAS, 311, 85 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A1 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A...

    2000

  8. [16]

    & Mirocha, J

    Ginsburg, A. & Mirocha, J. 2011, PySpecKit: Python Spectroscopic Toolkit, As- trophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1109.001

    2011

  9. [17]

    E., Heitsch, F., et al

    Hacar, A., Clark, S. E., Heitsch, F., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inut- suka, Y . Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 153

    2023

  10. [18]

    & Inutsuka, S.-i

    Hennebelle, P. & Inutsuka, S.-i. 2019, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sci- ences, 6, 5

    2019

  11. [19]

    L., Hill, R., Scott, D., et al

    Jow, D. L., Hill, R., Scott, D., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 1018

    2018

  12. [20]

    L., Evans, N

    Kauffmann, J., Bertoldi, F., Bourke, T. L., Evans, N. J., I., & Lee, C. W. 2008, A&A, 487, 993

    2008

  13. [21]

    Koch, E. W. & Rosolowsky, E. W. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3435

    2015

  14. [22]

    Koenig, X. P. & Leisawitz, D. T. 2014, ApJ, 791, 131 Könyves, V ., André, P., Men’shchikov, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A91

    2014

  15. [23]

    & Hoang, T

    Lazarian, A. & Hoang, T. 2007, MNRAS, 378, 910

    2007

  16. [24]

    B., Goodman, A., Sridharan, T

    Li, H. B., Goodman, A., Sridharan, T. K., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther, R. S. Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, & T. Henning, 101–123

    2014

  17. [25]

    M., Rodrigues, C

    Magalhaes, A. M., Rodrigues, C. V ., Margoniner, V . E., Pereyra, A., & Heath- cote, S. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 97, Polarimetry of the Interstellar Medium, ed. W. G. Roberge & D. C. B. Whittet, 118

    1996

  18. [26]

    2012, A&A, 547, A11

    Nielbock, M., Launhardt, R., Steinacker, J., et al. 2012, A&A, 547, A11

    2012

  19. [27]

    A., Wolf, C., Bessell, M

    Onken, C. A., Wolf, C., Bessell, M. S., et al. 2019, PASA, 36, e033

    2019

  20. [28]

    1964, ApJ, 140, 1056

    Ostriker, J. 1964, ApJ, 140, 1056

    1964

  21. [29]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

    Pattle, K., Fissel, L., Tahani, M., Liu, T., & Ntormousi, E. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y . Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 193

    2023

  22. [30]

    Pillai, T. G. S., Clemens, D. P., Reissl, S., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 1195 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2016, A&A, 586, A138 Ramírez, E. A., Magalhães, A. M., Davidson, Jr., J. W., Pereyra, A., & Rubinho, M. 2017, PASP, 129, 055001

    2020

  23. [31]

    O., Santos, F

    Redaelli, E., Alves, F. O., Santos, F. P., & Caselli, P. 2019, A&A, 631, A154 Román-Zúñiga, C. G., Alves, J. F., Lada, C. J., & Lombardi, M. 2010, ApJ, 725, 2232

    2019

  24. [32]

    2014, A&A, 562, A138

    Roy, A., André, P., Palmeirim, P., et al. 2014, A&A, 562, A138

    2014

  25. [33]

    Seifried, D., Walch, S., Reissl, S., & Ibáñez-Mejía, J. C. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 2697

    2019

  26. [34]

    D., Ade, P

    Soler, J. D., Ade, P. A. R., Angilè, F. E., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, A64

    2017

  27. [35]

    S., Redaelli, E., Galli, D., et al

    Tabatabaei, F. S., Redaelli, E., Galli, D., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A98

    2024

  28. [36]

    L., Lallement, R., & Cox, N

    Vergely, J. L., Lallement, R., & Cox, N. L. J. 2022, A&A, 664, A174

    2022

  29. [37]

    2019, ApJ, 876, 42

    Wang, J.-W., Lai, S.-P., Eswaraiah, C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 876, 42

    2019

  30. [38]

    2007, in Protostars and Plan- ets V , ed

    Ward-Thompson, D., André, P., Crutcher, R., et al. 2007, in Protostars and Plan- ets V , ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, & K. Keil, 33

    2007

  31. [39]

    Waskom, M. L. 2021, Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3021

    2021

  32. [40]

    M., & Rix, H.-W

    Zhang, X., Green, G. M., & Rix, H.-W. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 1855

    2023

  33. [41]

    & Chen, H

    Zucker, C. & Chen, H. H.-H. 2018, ApJ, 864, 152 Article number, page 10 of 11 Farideh S. Tabatabaei et al.: The Snake Filament: A study of polarization and kinematics Appendix A: Velocity dispersions The linewidth of the observed C 18O (1-0) molecular line was determined by fi...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.