Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 50 references

Electro-optic Kerr Effect Induced by Nonlinear Transport in monolayer WTe2

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper predicts that the electro-optic Kerr angle in monolayer WTe2 is dominated by the Berry curvature dipole and oscillates at twice the optical frequency, offering a time-resolved optical probe of the nonlinear Hall effect.

desk verdict A well-intentioned but internally inconsistent proposal: the 2ω nonlinear current cannot modify the refractive index at ω, so the central Kerr-angle prediction doesn't follow. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10309 v1 pith:6H754CLG submitted 2025-07-14 cond-mat.other cond-mat.mtrl-sci

He-Lin Li , Zhen-Gang Zhu , Gang Su This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.othercond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords electro-opticKerreffectnonlinearHallBerrycurvaturedipolemonolayerWTe2second-harmonicgenerationtime-resolvedspectroscopytransportopticalanisotropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper predicts that a non-magnetic material can show a Kerr-like rotation of reflected light, caused by the nonlinear Hall effect rather than by magnetism. Working with the prototypical nonlinear Hall material monolayer WTe2, the authors combine second-order conductivities with a frequency-dependent Kerr coefficient and find that the electro-optic Kerr angle is dominated by the Berry curvature dipole contribution. The angle also oscillates in time at twice the optical frequency, suggesting an all-optical, time-resolved probe of nonlinear transport and of the Berry curvature dipole itself.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the frequency-mixed kernel $K_{nm}(\omega_i) = i\omega_i\mu\,\sigma^{(1)}_{nm}(\omega_i) + \sum_{\alpha,\omega_j} i(\omega_i+\omega_j)\mu\,\sigma^{(2)}_{n\alpha m}(\omega_i+\omega_j)E_\alpha e^{i(k_j\cdot r - \omega_j t)}$, which replaces the ordinary linear conductivity inside the dispersion equation for the eigenmodes. The paper retains only the $\omega_i = \omega_j$ (second-harmonic) channel and discards the $\omega_i = -\omega_j$ static term. This kernel sets the two complex refractive indices $n_{i,\pm}$, hence the Fresnel reflection coefficients and the Kerr angle; the Berry curvature dipole, Drude, injection, and shift contributions to $\sigma^{(2)}$ all enter through this single object.

What would settle it

A direct null-test is to measure the polarization rotation of the reflected probe at frequency $\omega$ in monolayer WTe2 and check whether it oscillates at the second-harmonic period $1/(2f)$ and grows with applied field amplitude; if either signature is absent, the central claim is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that inserting the second-order conductivity $\sigma^{(2)}(\omega_i,\omega_j)$ into the wave-equation kernel $K_{nm}(\omega_i)$ yields two distinct complex refractive indices for a time-reversal-symmetric material, so linearly polarized light picks up a polarization rotation on reflection from monolayer WTe2. The rotation is dominated by the Berry curvature dipole term of the nonlinear conductivity, with Drude, injection, and shift currents contributing little because the intrinsic in-plane anisotropy dominates the background signal. Numerically, the total Kerr angle oscillates with period $1/(2f)$ at the frequencies considered, and its amplitude grows with the applied optical field. If correct, this gives a time-resolved, all-optical signature of the nonlinear Hall effect and a way to investigate material topology without breaking time-reversal symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction hinges on treating the second-harmonic (2$\omega$) nonlinear current as a piece of the optical response at the probe frequency $\omega$; if that frequency assignment does not hold, the computed Kerr rotation does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • EOKE would give an all-optical measurement of the Berry curvature dipole, since the Kerr angle tracks the BCD-dominated nonlinear conductivity.
  • The Kerr angle's oscillation period $1/(2f)$ places the predicted dynamics in the millisecond range for kHz driving, which is slower than existing time-resolved Kerr resolutions.
  • The amplitude of the Kerr rotation increases with the optical field strength, so field-dependent measurements can separate nonlinear contributions from the linear anisotropy background.
  • Because the effect does not require magnetization or an external magnetic field, it extends Kerr-type probes to time-reversal-symmetric systems.
  • The relative frequency-independence of the nonlinear conductivity implies the effect persists across a broad frequency window.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same formalism should apply to other inversion-broken, time-reversal-symmetric materials with a strong Berry curvature dipole (for instance few-layer WTe2 or Td-MoTe2), so the proposed probe need not be specific to monolayer WTe2.
  • A pump-probe experiment with picosecond resolution could resolve the predicted millisecond oscillation and also reveal transient BCD dynamics, since the oscillation is many orders of magnitude slower than the probe.
  • The discarded $\omega_i = -\omega_j$ static term is the usual route by which a field changes the refractive index; comparing Kerr rotation at the fundamental frequency with second-harmonic output would test whether the new frequency-mixing step is the true source.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an electro-optic Kerr effect (EOKE) induced by the nonlinear Hall effect in monolayer WTe2. The authors extend the magneto-optical Kerr formalism by inserting a second-order conductivity σ^(2)(ω_i,ω_j) into an effective response function K_nm(ω_i), which determines the complex refractive indices of the two eigenmodes. They evaluate the Berry curvature dipole, Drude, injection, and shift contributions using a six-band k·p model for T_d-WTe2 and report that the Berry curvature dipole dominates the calculated Kerr angle. They further claim that the Kerr angle oscillates in time with a period of 1/(2f), proposing this as a time-resolved optical probe of nonlinear Hall transport. The central claims are BCD dominance and the feasibility of time-resolved EOKE detection.

Significance. If the proposed mechanism were correct, this work would provide an all-optical, material-specific route to probing the Berry curvature dipole in non-magnetic, time-reversal-symmetric systems, which would be of substantial interest. The paper has some strengths: the conductivity tensors are evaluated from an established six-band model with parameters taken from the literature, and no parameter is fitted to the target Kerr angle. The numerical claims are in principle falsifiable. However, the load-bearing frequency assignment in Eq. (4) is internally inconsistent, and the reported temporal oscillations appear to be an artifact of the formalism rather than a physical prediction. Because the central mechanism does not follow from the stated equations, the expected significance cannot be realized in the present form.

major comments (4)
  1. [§II, Eq. (4) and Eqs. (2)–(5)] The second-order current in Eq. (2) has time dependence e^{-i(ω_i+ω_j)t}. For the only retained case ω_i=ω_j=ω, this is a current at frequency 2ω. A second-harmonic current acts as a radiating source at 2ω; it does not modify the refractive index at the fundamental frequency ω. The difference-frequency term ω_i=-ω_j, which would produce a static or low-frequency rectified polarization and is the standard mechanism for field-induced changes to the refractive index, is explicitly discarded by the condition ω_i+ω_j≠0 stated after Eq. (4). Consequently, the eigenmode equations (3)–(5) do not describe an electro-optic Kerr effect at the probe frequency, and the reported Kerr angle, the BCD-dominance claim, and the time-resolved detection proposal do not follow from the wave equation as written.
  2. [§IV.B, Figs. 3 and 4] The claimed temporal oscillations of the Kerr angle, with period 1/(2f)=0.5 ms, arise from retaining the factor e^{-iω_j t} inside the frequency-domain response K_nm(ω_i). The eigenmode problem for n_{i,±} in Eqs. (3)–(5) is solved at fixed frequency ω_i; the time dependence is not propagated through a time-dependent wave equation or a pump-probe calculation. The oscillatory Kerr signal is therefore an artifact of mixing time and frequency domains, not a predicted observable.
  3. [§III, Eqs. (13)–(18)] The conductivity integrals are written with d^3k/(2π)^3 for a monolayer whose Hamiltonian, Eq. (19), depends only on k_x and k_y. For a two-dimensional material the appropriate measure is d^2k/(2π)^2, or an explicit confinement thickness must be introduced. As written, the integrals have the wrong units, so the magnitudes of the linear and nonlinear conductivities, and hence the computed Kerr angles, are not well defined.
  4. [§II, text after Eq. (4)] The rule that σ^(2)(ω_i,ω_j) is included only when the corresponding first-order component σ^(1)(ω_i) vanishes is not derived from the formalism and is inconsistent with Eq. (4), where both terms appear simultaneously. This ad hoc selection makes K_nm(ω_i) discontinuous in frequency and determines which off-diagonal components enter the eigenmode equations. Because the numerical BCD-dominance result depends on which terms are retained, this rule is load-bearing and needs to be justified or replaced by a systematic expansion.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§II, Eq. (3)] The derivation of Eq. (3) is not shown in the main text and is attributed to Ref. [45], which is cited only as "Supplement material" without any version or content provided. The eigenmode equations are central to the paper, so the derivation should appear either in the text or in an accessible supplement.
  2. [Abstract and §IV.B] The manuscript refers to f=1 kHz and f=10 Hz–10^5 Hz as "optical frequencies" and discusses an "optical field amplitude." These are radio/audio frequencies, not optical frequencies; the relevance of the calculation to optical probing is therefore not established.
  3. [§II, Eq. (9)] The definition of θ_k as an average of Arg terms evaluated at ω<0 and ω>0 is not justified. The reflection coefficients at negative frequencies are related to those at positive frequencies by complex conjugation, so this step may double-count or partially cancel the Kerr rotation; a derivation of this formula is needed.
  4. [§II, Eq. (2)] The summation over (k_i,ω_i)=(±k,±ω) is written explicitly for the electric field but not for the second-order current, where the sum over ω_j=±ω appears without a corresponding sum over k_j and ω_i. The notation hides the fact that the nonlinear current contains all combinations of the two frequencies and wavevectors.
  5. [§II, Eq. (3)] Eq. (3) is typeset with an unclear square-root bracket; the products K_xz K_yy K_zx and similar terms appear inside the same radical as the quadratic terms. Please rewrite the expression with unambiguous delimiters and line breaks.
  6. [Figs. 2 and 3] The conductivity notation switches between σ_{xxx}, σ_{yyy} in Fig. 2 and σ^{nαm} in Eq. (4); the correspondence between the two index conventions should be defined explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Kerr angle and BCD-dominance claim are computed from fixed inputs, not fitted or definitionally forced; the self-citation to Ref. [40] is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation starts from the Shi et al. six-band model [48] and standard quantum-kinetic conductivity formulas attributed to Matsyshyn-Sodemann [39] and Sipe-Shkrebtii [41], with fixed parameters (τ=5 ps, E_f=0.12 eV, ε_r=3.3) taken from cited external work. The Kerr angle is obtained by inserting these conductivities into K_nm(ω_i) in Eq. (4), solving Eqs. (3)/(5) for the eigenmode indices, and applying the Fresnel formula Eq. (7). No parameter is fitted to the target Kerr angle, and the statement that the BCD contribution dominates is a computed outcome of comparing the magnitudes of the four nonlinear conductivities (Fig. 5), not an input assumption. The only self-citation of possible relevance is Ref. [40] for the WTe2 conductivity expressions, but those formulas also trace to independent literature [39,41] and the Hamiltonian to Ref. [48]; the manuscript does not invoke any author-specific uniqueness theorem to forbid alternatives. The weakest point of the paper is physical rather than circular: Eq. (4) retains only the ω_i=ω_j SHG term while discarding the rectification term, so a 2ω nonlinear current is inserted into a refractive index at ω. That is a possible frequency-assignment error, not a case of a prediction reducing by construction to its inputs, and it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on assumed parameter values (τ, E_f, ε_r, δ1,z, T) and on a nonstandard frequency-mixing rule. No new particles or fields are introduced, but the key axiom that a 2ω current modifies the ω refractive index is ad hoc and load-bearing.

free parameters (6)
  • Relaxation time τ = 5 ps
    Chosen by hand; enters all conductivity denominators and strongly controls the relative sizes of BCD, Drude, injection, and shift contributions.
  • Fermi energy E_f = 0.12 eV
    Chosen for the calculation; sets the occupation and the magnitude of the Berry curvature dipole. No procedure or experimental source is given for this value.
  • Relative permittivity ε_r = 3.3
    Taken from Ref. [49]; an input that sets the baseline refractive index and the linear Kerr background.
  • Electric-field-induced spin-orbit coupling δ_{1,z} = 0.025 eV
    Set in the k·p Hamiltonian for the band structure in Fig. 1; affects the Berry curvature and BCD. Other δ terms are set to approximately zero.
  • Temperature T = 80 K
    Chosen for the Fermi-Dirac distributions in the conductivity integrals; no justification is given.
  • Optical field amplitude |E| = 10^-1 V/nm in main plots
    Used to fix the scale of the nonlinear contribution; the paper shows the Kerr angle depends on this amplitude (Fig. 4).
assumptions (6)
  • ad hoc to paper The nonlinear current at ω_i=ω_j=ω can be treated as a correction to the refractive index at ω inside K_nm(ω_i) (Eq. 4).
    This is the load-bearing step; the current actually oscillates at 2ω and no justification is given for why it modifies the fundamental-frequency eigenmodes.
  • ad hoc to paper Only ω_i=ω_j is retained; ω_i=-ω_j is discarded because ω_i+ω_j≠0.
    The discarded static (rectification) term is the one that would produce a DC field-induced change of the optical response; the retained term drives SHG, not the probe frequency.
  • ad hoc to paper Second-order conductivity is included only when the corresponding first-order component vanishes.
    A perturbative selection rule invented for this calculation; not derived from the wave equation and may discard comparable corrections.
  • domain assumption The six-band k·p model of Shi and Song (Ref. [48]) accurately describes monolayer T_d-WTe2 across the Brillouin zone.
    All numerical results inherit the model's accuracy; the paper provides no ab initio validation.
  • domain assumption Standard quantum kinetic expressions for BCD, Drude, injection, and shift conductivities (Refs. [39-41]) are applicable in the low-frequency, finite-relaxation regime.
    The formulas are taken from prior literature and assumed valid at f≈10-10^5 Hz with τ=5 ps.
  • domain assumption Thin-film approximation d<<λ and normal-incidence plane-wave reduction of Maxwell's equations are valid for monolayer WTe2.
    Used to derive the eigenmodes in Eqs. (3)-(6); no discussion of substrate or multilayer effects is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electro-optic Kerr Effect Induced by Nonlinear Transport in monolayer WTe2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6H754CLG

@misc{pith2026250710309,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electro-optic Kerr Effect Induced by Nonlinear Transport in monolayer WTe2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6H754CLG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10309}
}
abstract

The nonlinear Hall effect (NLHE) can induce optical anisotropy by modifying a material's dielectric tensor, presenting opportunities for novel characterization and device applications. While the magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) probes the linear Hall effect (LHE) in magnetic materials, an analogous optical probe for NLHE in non-magnetic, time-reversal symmetric systems remains highly desirable. Here, we theoretically propose and investigate an NLHE-induced Electro-optic Kerr Effect (EOKE) as such a probe. Focusing on monolayer (ML) WTe$_2$, a prototypical NLHE material, our analysis considers contributions from Berry curvature dipole (BCD), Drude, injection, and shift mechanisms. We demonstrate that the EOKE signal in WTe$_2$ is predominantly governed by the BCD. Furthermore, the Kerr angle exhibits temporal oscillations at different optical frequencies, suggesting EOKE as a promising route for the time-resolved detection of NLHE and the dynamic investigation of material topology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10309 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of a single layer of WTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Linear and nonlinear longitudinal conductivity as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Temporal variation of the electro-optic Kerr angle with parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temporal variation of the total electro-optic Kerr angle under different electric field strengths, with fixed parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Nonlinear conductivities with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [40]

    Liu, Z.-G

    Y. Liu, Z.-G. Zhu, and G. Su, Photogalvanic effect and second-harmonic generation from radio to infrared wave- lengths in the wte 2 monolayer, Phys. Rev. B109, 085117 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Z.-H. Gong, Z. Z. Du, H.-P. Sun, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Nonlinear transport theory at the order of quantum metric (2025), arXiv:2410.04995

    arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    T. Low, Y. Jiang, and F. Guinea, Topological currents in black phosphorus with broken inversion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B92, 235447 (2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    Ma, S.-Y

    Q. Ma, S.-Y. Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V. Fatemi, T.-R. Chang, A. M. Mier Valdivia, S. Wu, Z. Du, C.-H. Hsu, et al., Observation of the nonlinear hall effect under time- reversal-symmetric conditions, Nature565, 337 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, Z.-G. Zhu, and G. Su, Intrinsic non- linear ohmic current, Phys. Rev. B109, 085419 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Z. Du, C. Wang, S. Li, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Disorder- induced nonlinear hall effect with time-reversal symme- try, Nature communications10, 3047 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Isobe, S.-Y

    H. Isobe, S.-Y. Xu, and L. Fu, High-frequency rectifi- cation via chiral bloch electrons, Science Advances6, eaay2497 (2020),

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Z. Du, C. Wang, H.-P. Sun, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Quan- tum theory of the nonlinear hall effect, Nature commu- nications12, 5038 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Ho, C.-H

    S.-C. Ho, C.-H. Chang, Y.-C. Hsieh, S.-T. Lo, B. Huang, T.-H.-Y. Vu, C. Ortix, and T.-M. Chen, Hall effects in artificially corrugated bilayer graphene without break- ing time-reversal symmetry, Nature Electronics4, 116 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Watanabe and Y

    H. Watanabe and Y. Yanase, Nonlinear electric transport in odd-parity magnetic multipole systems: Application to mn-based compounds, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043081 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    J. Duan, Y. Jian, Y. Gao, H. Peng, J. Zhong, Q. Feng, J. Mao, and Y. Yao, Giant second-order nonlinear hall effect in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 186801 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    P. He, H. Isobe, G. K. W. Koon, J. Y. Tan, J. Hu, J. Li, N. Nagaosa, and J. Shen, Third-order nonlinear hall ef- fect in a quantum hall system, Nature Nanotechnology 19, 1460 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    J. Yao, Y. Liu, and W. Duan, Geometrical nonlinear hall effect induced by lorentz force, Phys. Rev. B110, 115123 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    C. Chen, D. Zhai, C. Xiao, and W. Yao, Crossed nonlin- ear dynamical hall effect in twisted bilayers, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L012059 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Xiang and J

    L. Xiang and J. Wang, Intrinsic in-plane magnetonon- linear hall effect in tilted weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 109, 075419 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Xiong, Z

    Y. Xiong, Z. Gong, and H. Jin, Strain tuning of the non- linear anomalous hall effect in mos2 monolayer, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter37, 195301 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    Zhong, W

    Y. Zhong, W. Feng, Z. Liu, C. Zhang, and J. Cao, Non- linear optical conductivity of weyl semimetals in the ter- ahertz regime, Physica B: Condensed Matter555, 81 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Choi, M.-H

    Y.-G. Choi, M.-H. Doan, Y. Kim, and G.-M. Choi, Non- linear optical hall effect in weyl semimetal wte2 (2021), arXiv:2103.08173

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Zhang, K

    T. Zhang, K. Ooi, W. Chen, L. Ang, and Y. Sin Ang, Op- tical kerr effect and third harmonic generation in topo- logical dirac/weyl semimetal, Optics express27, 38270 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Morimoto and N

    T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Topological nature of nonlinear optical effects in solids, Science Advances2, e1501524 (2016),

    2016

  13. [21]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    Nakatsuji, N

    S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, and T. Higo, Large anoma- lous hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature, Nature527, 212 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    Machida, S

    Y. Machida, S. Nakatsuji, S. Onoda, T. Tayama, and T. Sakakibara, Time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect without magnetic dipole order, Nature463, 210 (2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    Yasuda, R

    K. Yasuda, R. Wakatsuki, T. Morimoto, R. Yoshimi, A. Tsukazaki, K. Takahashi, M. Ezawa, M. Kawasaki, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Geometric hall effects in 8 topological insulator heterostructures, Nature Physics 12, 555 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Sun, and B. Yan, Berry curvature dipole in weyl semimetal materials: An ab initio study, Phys. Rev. B97, 041101 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Singh, J

    S. Singh, J. Kim, K. M. Rabe, and D. Vanderbilt, En- gineering weyl phases and nonlinear hall effects in t d- mote2, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 046402 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    J. I. Facio, D. Efremov, K. Koepernik, J.-S. You, I. Sode- mann, and J. van den Brink, Strongly enhanced berry dipole at topological phase transitions in bitei, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 246403 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    P. N. Argyres, Theory of the faraday and kerr effects in ferromagnetics, Phys. Rev.97, 334 (1955)

    1955

  22. [30]

    Crova, J

    A. Crova, J. KERR. -A new relation between electricity and light : dielectrified m´ edia birefringent (Nouvelle re- lation entre l’´ electricit´ e et la lumi` ere. Bir´ efringence des milieux di´ electriques transparents); Philosophical Mag- azine, 3 e s´ erie, t. L, p. 337, n...

  23. [31]

    Oppeneer,Theory of the Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect in Ferromagnetic Compounds(1999)

    P. Oppeneer,Theory of the Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect in Ferromagnetic Compounds(1999)

    1999

  24. [32]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear hall effect induced by berry curvature dipole in time-reversal in- variant materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    N. Wang, D. Kaplan, Z. Zhang, T. Holder, N. Cao, A. Wang, X. Zhou, F. Zhou, Z. Jiang, C. Zhang,et al., Quantum-metric-induced nonlinear transport in a topo- logical antiferromagnet, Nature621, 487 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Du, H.-Z

    Z. Du, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Nonlinear hall effects, Na- ture Reviews Physics3, 744 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    K. Kang, T. Li, E. Sohn, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Nonlin- ear anomalous hall effect in few-layer wte2, Nature ma- terials18, 324 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Z. Z. Du, C. M. Wang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Band signatures for strong nonlinear hall effect in bilayer wte2, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 266601 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Jiang, F

    J. Jiang, F. Tang, X. C. Pan, H. M. Liu, X. H. Niu, Y. X. Wang, D. F. Xu, H. F. Yang, B. P. Xie, F. Q. Song, P. Dudin, T. K. Kim, M. Hoesch, P. K. Das, I. Vobornik, X. G. Wan, and D. L. Feng, Signature of strong spin- orbital coupling in the large nonsaturating magnetoresis- t...

    2015

  30. [38]

    T. J. Huisman, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, T. Rasing, A. V. Kimel, A. Tsukamoto, B. de Ronde, L. Ma, W. J. Fan, and S. M. Zhou, Sub-100-ps dynamics of the anoma- lous hall effect at terahertz frequencies, Phys. Rev. B 95, 094418 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Matsyshyn and I

    O. Matsyshyn and I. Sodemann, Nonlinear hall accelera- tion and the quantum rectification sum rule, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 246602 (2019)

    2019

  32. [41]

    J. E. Sipe and A. I. Shkrebtii, Second-order optical re- sponse in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B61, 5337 (2000)

    2000

  33. [42]

    V. N. Antonov, B. N. Harmon, and A. N. Yaresko, Elec- tronic structure and magneto-optical properties of solids (2004)

    2004

  34. [43]

    M.-H. Kim, G. Acbas, M.-H. Yang, I. Ohkubo, H. Chris- ten, D. Mandrus, M. A. Scarpulla, O. D. Dubon, Z. Schlesinger, P. Khalifah, and J. Cerne, Determination of the infrared complex magnetoconductivity tensor in itinerant ferromagnets from faraday and kerr measure- ments, Phys...

    2007

  35. [44]

    X. Yang, P. Yang, X. Zhou, W. Feng, and Y. Yao, First- and second-order magneto-optical effects and intrinsi- cally anomalous transport in the two-dimensional van der waals layered magnets cr xy (x= s, se, te; y= cl, br, i), Phys. Rev. B106, 054408 (2022)

    2022

  36. [45]

    Material, Supplement material,

    S. Material, Supplement material,

  37. [46]

    W. Zhao, E. Runburg, Z. Fei, J. Mutch, P. Malinowski, B. Sun, X. Huang, D. Pesin, Y.-T. Cui, X. Xu, J.-H. Chu, and D. H. Cobden, Determination of the spin axis in quantum spin hall insulator candidate monolayer wte2, Phys. Rev. X11, 041034 (2021)

    2021

  38. [47]

    J.-S. You, S. Fang, S.-Y. Xu, E. Kaxiras, and T. Low, Berry curvature dipole current in the transition metal dichalcogenides family, Phys. Rev. B98, 121109 (2018)

    2018

  39. [48]

    Shi and J

    L.-k. Shi and J. C. W. Song, Symmetry, spin-texture, and tunable quantum geometry in a wte 2 monolayer, Phys. Rev. B99, 035403 (2019)

    2019

  40. [49]

    Kumar and P

    A. Kumar and P. Ahluwalia, Tunable dielectric response of transition metals dichalcogenides mx2 (m=mo, w; x=s, se, te): Effect of quantum confinement, Physica B: Condensed Matter407, 4627 (2012)

    2012

  41. [50]

    Probst, C

    H. Probst, C. M¨ oller, M. Schumacher, T. Brede, J. K. De- whurst, M. Reutzel, D. Steil, S. Sharma, G. S. M. Jansen, and S. Mathias, Unraveling femtosecond spin and charge dynamics with extreme ultraviolet transverse moke spec- troscopy, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013107 (2024)

    2024

  42. [51]

    Anad´ on, H

    A. Anad´ on, H. Singh, E. D ´ ıaz, Y. Le-Guen, J. Hohlfeld, R. B. Wilson, G. Malinowski, M. Hehn, and J. Gorchon, Large spin accumulation signals in ultrafast magneto- optical experiments (2025), arXiv:2501.05838

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.