Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Assessing interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS with the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio Canarias and the Two-meter Twin Telescope

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read 3I/ATLAS, the third known interstellar visitor, is an active reddish comet with a 16.8-hour rotation and a parent system in the Milky Way's thin disk.

desk verdict Solid rapid-response characterization of the third interstellar object with a new rotation period and independent spectrum; the thin-disk parent-star claim is weakly supported, but the object's own kinematics justify thin-disk membership. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.12922 v4 pith:AFER7CSC submitted 2025-07-17 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.GA

R. de la Fuente Marcos , M. R. Alarcon , J. Licandro , M Serra-Ricart , J. de Leon , C. de la Fuente Marcos , G. Lombardi , A. Tejero
show 3 more authors
A. Cabrera-Lavers S. Guerra Arencibia I. Ruiz Cejudo
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.GA
keywords 3I/ATLASinterstellarcometC/2025N1reflectancespectroscopycometaryactivityrotationperiodGalactickinematicsthindisk
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first detailed physical characterization of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS using spectroscopy and photometry from the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio Canarias and the Two-meter Twin Telescope. It finds that 3I/ATLAS has a visible reflectance spectrum slightly redder than those of the two previous interstellar visitors and comparable to those of Solar System trans-Neptunian objects and Centaurs, with a spectral slope of $18.3\pm0.9$ %/1000 Å across 3800–9200 Å. The comet is active with a dust coma at 3.44 au, shows no detectable gas emission, and rotates with a period of $16.79\pm0.23$ h. Backward and forward N-body integrations confirm that it came from interstellar space and will leave again, and its Galactic velocity places its parent system in the Milky Way's thin disk, possibly around a solar-like star. If the claims hold, the result strengthens the case that extrasolar debris resembles Solar System debris in composition and formation.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by four linked measurements. The reflectance spectrum, built by ratioing comet spectra to solar analogs and normalized at 5500 Å, provides the compositional anchor and the spectral slope. The $g'$-band light curve, phased with generalized Lomb–Scargle and phase-dispersion minimization, yields the rotation period and its 0.2 mag amplitude. The dust-production proxy $Af\rho$, corrected with the Halley–Marcus phase function, quantifies the coma. The kinematic context comes from Monte Carlo covariance-matrix N-body integrations of 1000 control orbits plus a Gaia DR3 search for stars with matching $(U,V,W)$, interpreted through the Toomre-diagram separation of thin disk, thick disk, and halo.

What would settle it

A dedicated follow-up campaign—several consecutive nights of $g'$-band photometry on a 2 m-class telescope with minute cadence and apertures that isolate the nucleus—should recover the same $16.79\pm0.23$ h period and $0.2$ mag amplitude; a period that shifts with aperture size or night would instead indicate coma variability. Separately, high-resolution radial velocities of the velocity-matched Gaia DR3 stars would test whether the thin-disk sibling association survives once the large catalog radial-velocity errors are replaced by precise measurements.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that 3I/ATLAS is not an inert asteroid but an active, reddish comet: its continuum-subtracted reflectance spectrum is slightly redder than D-type asteroids, 1I/'Oumuamua, and 2I/Borisov, with a slope of $18.3\pm0.9$ %/1000 Å in 3800–9200 Å, similar to trans-Neptunian objects and Centaurs. It has a well-defined dust coma spanning about 26,000 km × 25,000 km at 3.44 au, a phase-corrected dust-production proxy $A(0)f\rho = 209\pm4$ cm, no detectable CN or other gas bands above $Q(\mathrm{CN})_{\mathrm{lim}}=5.6\times10^{24}$ mol s$^{-1}$, and a low-amplitude rotation period of $16.79\pm0.23$ h. Dynamically, the pre-encounter trajectory shows it entered from interstellar space at about $-58$ km s$^{-1}$ with a radiant in Sagittarius, and its Galactic velocity components $(U,V,W)=(-51.233,-19.456,+18.930)$ km s$^{-1}$, combined with kinematic analogs from Gaia DR3, place it in the Galactic thin disk with a solar-type, slightly subsolar-metallicity parent star.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 0.2-magnitude brightness modulation seen across three nights is the nucleus's rotation rather than a sampling alias or changing coma, and, separately, that the Gaia DR3 stars selected by similar velocities are true kinematic siblings of 3I/ATLAS despite their large radial-velocity uncertainties.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At perihelion on October 29, 2025, 3I/ATLAS will be at its closest to the Sun and then depart on a hyperbolic trajectory, so targeted monitoring around that date can measure how activity and color change with heliocentric distance.
  • The spectral match to TNOs and Centaurs means that at least one extrasolar comet formed in a regime that produced outer-Solar-System-like surface colors, supporting the idea that planetesimal formation is a common outcome across planetary systems.
  • The absence of gas emission at 3.44 au, with only a dust coma, indicates dust-dominated activity at large heliocentric distances, a behavior shared with many Solar System comets and therefore not unique to this interloper.
  • The 16.79 h rotation period and 0.2 mag amplitude provide the first spin constraint for 3I/ATLAS, a baseline for future photometry that could reveal shape, density, or tumbling.
  • If the thin-disk assignment holds, the parent planetary system is unlikely to be very old or metal-poor; follow-up of candidate sibling stars could identify the host star.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: if the light curve is double-peaked, the true sidereal rotation period could be twice the reported 16.79 h, and the current value may therefore be a lower limit on the period rather than the full spin period.
  • Inference: the redder-than-D-type slope places 3I/ATLAS at the red end of the small-body color distribution, suggesting that interstellar debris can be as irradiation-processed as outer Solar System surfaces if future interstellar comets show similar slopes.
  • Inference: the kinematic-parent claim yields a concrete target list: Gaia DR3 stars near the radiant with $(U,V,W)$ within a few km s$^{-1}$ deserve high-resolution radial-velocity follow-up to see whether the thin-disk sibling association survives.
  • Inference: comparing the 18.3%/1000 Å slope with future near-infrared spectra would test whether the red color is intrinsic surface composition or partly coma-scattered light, since the present visible data cannot separate these contributions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multi-wavelength characterization of the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS based on GTC/OSIRIS spectroscopy and TTT photometry. It reports a visible reflectance spectrum with a spectral slope S' = 18.3 ± 0.9 %/1000 Å (3800–9200 Å), the absence of detectable gas emission with an upper limit Q(CN) = 5.6 × 10^24 mol/s, a dust coma with phase-normalized A(0)fρ = 209 ± 4 cm, and a rotation period of 16.79 ± 0.23 h. Using N-body integrations and a Gaia DR3 kinematic-analog search, the paper argues that 3I/ATLAS originated in the Galactic thin disk and that its parent system includes a solar-like star with slightly subsolar metallicity.

Significance. If its conclusions hold, this is a valuable early characterization of only the third known interstellar object, and it extends the comparative sample beyond 1I/'Oumuamua and 2I/Borisov. The paper's strengths are its use of standard reduction and analysis techniques, cross-checks against several independent groups' measurements of the same object, and a Monte Carlo covariance method for propagating orbital uncertainties into the pre-encounter trajectory. The spectral slope, activity level, and rotation period are all, in principle, reproducible from the presented data. The thin-disk origin claim would be an important connection between interstellar objects and Galactic stellar populations, but, as discussed below, that claim is currently supported by an under-specified statistical analysis and should be either substantially strengthened or appropriately softened.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix F, §3, Conclusion 5] The kinematic-analog analysis is load-bearing for the thin-disk-parent claim, but the paper does not state the selection criteria, the number of matched Gaia DR3 stars, or a false-alarm rate. Appendix F itself concedes that 'the uncertainties in the values of the radial velocity of the relevant stars in Gaia DR3 are significant and this leads to errors in the components of the velocity which are much larger than those computed for 3I/ATLAS.' With velocity errors much larger than the matching box, a velocity-box search will capture many ordinary thin-disk field stars by chance, so the reported [Fe/H] = −0.04 ± 0.14 for the matched sample is not demonstrated to be the metallicity of the parent system. The paper should quantify the expected number of chance matches given Gaia DR3 uncertainties, provide the selection cuts, and ideally test whether the backward trajectory of 3I/ATLAS actually encounters any of the matched stars. At minimum, Conclusion 5 should be softened to state only the Toomre-diagram thin-disk constraint, which is independently valid.
  2. [§2.2, Appendix A.1] The quoted uncertainty on the spectral slope, S' = 18.3 ± 0.9 %/1000 Å, is a random-only error derived from bootstrap resampling, and the text explicitly states that the systematic error associated with the two different solar analogs is not considered. Since the spectral classification and the comparison with D-types, TNOs, and Centaurs depend directly on the slope, the paper should either include a systematic term in the error budget or provide a quantitative estimate of its magnitude. As written, the error bar is a lower bound, and the level of consistency with independent measurements should be stated in the same context.
  3. [§2.3, Appendix D] The rotation period rests on a low-amplitude modulation of about 0.2 mag observed over three nights. The paper does not report a formal false-alarm probability for the Lomb–Scargle or PDM peak, does not present a spectral-window or alias analysis, and does not explicitly test whether coma variability could produce the same signal. Given that the amplitude is comparable to plausible coma fluctuations, the statement that the signal 'reflects the intrinsic rotation of 3I/ATLAS' is stronger than the presented evidence supports. The period should be labeled as tentative, or Appendix D should be expanded with a significance estimate and an alias check.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract vs. §2.2] The abstract gives the slope range as 4000–9000 Å, while the main text and conclusions state 3800–9200 Å; these should be made consistent.
  2. [Conclusion 2] The phrase 'somewhat bluer in the 7000-5000 Å range' is presumably a typo for '7000–9000 Å' and should be corrected.
  3. [Appendix F, Fig. F.2] The text describes the matched stars as 'Solar-like,' but the cited example star has Teff = 4580 K, which is cooler than a solar-type star; please clarify the intended stellar-type range.
  4. [Appendix B] The sentence 'this factor was applied to every sky-subtracted frame before stacking' begins with a lowercase letter after a period; please fix the capitalization and check similar issues elsewhere.
  5. [§2.1] The notation A(0)fρ, with the parenthetical zero, is nonstandard and could be confused with a function evaluation; consider writing A fρ (0°) or defining the notation at first use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: physical characterization and dynamics rest on new observations, external standards, and independent epoch data; self-cited methods are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central results are not derived from its own conclusions. The reflectance slope (S'=18.3±0.9%/1000 Å) is computed from OSIRIS spectra divided by Landolt solar analogs and is cross-compared with independently published slopes (Opitom et al., Alvarez-Candal et al., Seligman et al.); the Afρ and CN upper limit follow standard A'Hearn/Haser prescriptions from new GTC/TTT images. The rotation period is a Lomb-Scargle/PDM fit to an observed time series, with a control-star check; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The Galactic velocity (U,V,W)=(-51.233,-19.456,+18.930) km/s is the propagated JPL orbit using the authors' Monte Carlo covariance method, a pure uncertainty-propagation tool, and the thin-disk classification is checked against the external Toomre criteria of Bensby et al. (2003) and Nissen (2004). The Gaia DR3 kinematic-analog search selects stars by velocity near the radiant and then reads off their [Fe/H]; although Appendix F concedes large radial-velocity uncertainties, this is a statistical/correctness weakness, not a circular reduction: the metallicity is not an input to the selection. Self-citations (de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos 2015, 2019; de León et al. 2020) are methodological conventions and are not load-bearing claims, so under the hard rules they do not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The paper's central results use standard observational reduction, cometary models, and published orbit solutions; the most speculative part, the parent-system identification, relies on a kinematic matching assumption in Gaia DR3 that the authors themselves flag as uncertain.

free parameters (2)
  • Spectral slope S' = 18.3 +/- 0.9 %/1000 Angstrom
    Linear fit to the GTC reflectance spectrum; used for the spectral classification. The quoted error excludes systematic solar-analog calibration error, as the authors state.
  • Rotation period P_rot = 16.79 +/- 0.23 h
    PDM and Lomb-Scargle fits to the TTT g'-band light curve; adopted as the nucleus rotation period.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The hyperbolic orbit from JPL (e = 6.144 +/- 0.003, barycentric significance > 1718 sigma) proves 3I/ATLAS is of interstellar origin.
    Used as the starting point for all dynamics in Appendix E; the paper does not independently solve the orbit beyond quoting JPL.
  • domain assumption Haser model with v_p = 0.86 r_h^-4 km/s, v_d = 1 km/s, and scale lengths from A'Hearn et al. (1995).
    Converts the CN flux upper limit into Q(CN) in Appendix C.
  • domain assumption DeMeo et al. (2009) D-type taxonomy and comparison spectra for 1I and 2I are representative of those classes.
    Used to state that 3I/ATLAS is redder than D-types and similar to TNOs and Centaurs in Section 2.2.
  • domain assumption The 60-day JPL orbit can be propagated 30,000 years into the past and future using the MCCM method.
    Underlies the pre-encounter and post-encounter trajectories in Section 2.4 and Appendix E; assumes no unmodeled nongravitational forces alter the path significantly.
  • domain assumption Gaia DR3 stars with space velocities near 3I/ATLAS are valid kinematic siblings whose metallicities describe the parent system.
    Basis for the thin-disk conclusion in Section 3 and Appendix F; the paper acknowledges large radial-velocity errors for the selected stars.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Assessing interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS with the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio Canarias and the Two-meter Twin Telescope." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AFER7CSC

@misc{pith2026250712922,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Assessing interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS with the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio Canarias and the Two-meter Twin Telescope},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AFER7CSC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.12922}
}
read the original abstract

Context. Theories of the formation and evolution of small bodies in planetary systems predict that they may escape into interstellar space at any time. After having characterized just two such interlopers -1I/2017 U1 (Oumuamua) and 2I/Borisov more questions were raised than answered. Assessing the recently discovered interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS will only broaden our understanding of this complex topic. Aims. Here, we investigate the spectral, cometary, and rotational properties of 3I/ATLAS as well as its dynamical context. Methods. We identified the spectral type of 3I/ATLAS from the visible reflectance spectrum and used photometric observations to derive its level of activity and rotational properties. Observational data were obtained with the OSIRIS camera spectrograph at the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio Canarias and the Two-meter Twin Telescope. We used N-body simulations and statistical analyses of Gaia DR3 data to investigate the origin of 3I/ATLAS and its Galactic background. Results. Interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS has a visible spectrum slightly redder than those of D-type asteroids, 1I/'Oumuamua and 2I/Borisov, with a spectral slope of 18.3%/1000 A in the 4000-9000 A range, which is similar to those of TNOs and Centaurs. It has a conspicuous coma and its rotation period is 16.79 h. The heliocentric components of its Galactic velocity were (U, V, W) = (-51.233, -19.456, 18.930) km/s with a radiant in Sagittarius. The analysis of a sample of kinematic analogs of 3I/ATLAS extracted from Gaia DR3 suggests that its parent system is part of the Galactic thin disk and includes a solar-like star with slightly sub-solar metallicity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.12922 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Stacked g–band image created by co-adding 227 expo￾sures (3.15 h) obtained on July 2, 2025. The overlaid contour delineates the coma boundary at the 2σ level above the sky back￾ground, corresponding to a surface brightness of µg = 25.4 mag arcsec−2 in the AB system. Arrows indicate the projected veloc￾ity vector of the comet (v) and the antisolar direction (−⊙). The direction of the semimajor axis (a) of the ellipse… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Near-UV to visible reflectance spectrum of 3I/ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Folded light curve of 3I/ATLAS. The top panel shows the magnitude variation relative to the nightly median, which is, in the g band, 18.76, 18.79, and 18.49, respectively. The black line corresponds to a second-order sinusoidal curve fit with a period obtained from the PDM method. The bottom panel displays the data for a non-variable control star, also normalized by its me￾dian magnitude, demonstrating the lack of s… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Very Large Telescope observations of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS III: High-resolution monitoring of CN and forbidden oxygen emission across the perihelion passage with ESPRESSO

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    3I/ATLAS becomes progressively water-dominated near perihelion, with CN production falling as r_h^-4.62 on the inbound leg and a green-to-red oxygen ratio comparable to 2I/Borisov.

  2. Precovery Observations of 3I/ATLAS from TESS Suggests Possible Distant Activity

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Archival TESS images show 3I/ATLAS was brighter than distance effects alone can explain, implying possible cometary activity at ~6 au from the Sun.

  3. Near-Discovery Observations of Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS with the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    New observations of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS produce the first near-infrared spectrum, showing a red slope that turns neutral at longer wavelengths, no water ice absorption, and a model-dependent upper limit of <7%...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    F., Millis , R

    A'Hearn , M. F., Millis , R. C., Schleicher , D. O., Osip , D. J., & Birch , P. V. 1995, , 118, 223

    work page 1995

  2. [2]

    F., Schleicher , D

    A'Hearn , M. F., Schleicher , D. G., Millis , R. L., Feldman , P. D., & Thompson , D. T. 1984, , 89, 579

    work page 1984

  3. [3]

    & Ichikawa , T

    Akhlaghi , M. & Ichikawa , T. 2015, , 220, 1

    2015

  4. [4]

    L., Lara , L

    Alvarez-Candal , A., Rizos , J. L., Lara , L. M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.07312

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    2025, Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2025-N89

    Bellini , F., Aletti , A., Buzzi , L., et al. 2025, Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2025-N89

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Palomar and Apache Point Spectrophotometry of Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS

    Belyakov , M., Fremling , C., Graham , M. J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.11720

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    2003, , 410, 527

    Bensby , T., Feltzing , S., & Lundstr \"o m , I. 2003, , 410, 527

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    2006, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Bertin , E. 2006, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 351, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV, ed. C. Gabriel , C. Arviset , D. Ponz , & S. Enrique , 112

    2006

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Bertin , E., Mellier , Y., Radovich , M., et al. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 281, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XI, ed. D. A. Bohlender , D. Durand , & T. H. Handley , 228

    2002

  2. [10]

    C., Gordon , K

    Bohlin , R. C., Gordon , K. D., & Tremblay , P. E. 2014, , 126, 711

    2014

  3. [11]

    T., Belyakov, M., Fremling, C., et al

    Bolin, B. T., Belyakov, M., Fremling, C., et al. 2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, slaf078

    2025

  4. [12]

    2010, in Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, Vol

    Cepa , J. 2010, in Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, Vol. 14, Highlights of Spanish Astrophysics V, ed. J. M. Diego , L. J. Goicoechea , J. I. Gonz \'a lez-Serrano , & J. Gorgas , 15

    2010

  5. [13]

    G., et al

    Cepa , J., Aguiar , M., Escalera , V. G., et al. 2000, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4008, Optical and IR Telescope Instrumentation and Detectors, ed. M. Iye & A. F. Moorwood , 623--631

    2000

  6. [14]

    C., Magnier , E

    Chambers , K. C., Magnier , E. A., Metcalfe , N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560

    2016 arXiv

  7. [15]

    2025, Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2025-N102

    Chernyshov , A., Nazarov , S., Robinson , J., et al. 2025, Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2025-N102

    2025

  8. [16]

    L., Barker , E

    Cochran , A. L., Barker , E. S., & Gray , C. L. 2012, , 218, 144

    2012

  9. [17]

    Collaboration , Z. T. F., Ye , Q. Z., Nastasi , A., et al. 2025, Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2025-N51

    2025

  10. [18]

    & de la Fuente Marcos , R

    de la Fuente Marcos , C. & de la Fuente Marcos , R. 2015, , 453, 1288

    2015

  11. [19]

    & de la Fuente Marcos , C

    de la Fuente Marcos , R. & de la Fuente Marcos , C. 2019, , 627, A104

    2019

  12. [20]

    de la Fuente Marcos , R., de la Fuente Marcos , C., & Aarseth , S. J. 2024, , 690, A395

    2024

  13. [21]

    2020, , 495, 2053

    de Le \'o n , J., Licandro , J., de la Fuente Marcos , C., et al. 2020, , 495, 2053

    2020

  14. [22]

    2019, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 3, 131

    de Le \'o n , J., Licandro , J., Serra-Ricart , M., et al. 2019, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 3, 131

    2019

  15. [23]

    E., Bannister , M

    Deam , S. E., Bannister , M. T., Opitom , C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.05051

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    E., Binzel , R

    DeMeo , F. E., Binzel , R. P., Slivan , S. M., & Bus , S. J. 2009, , 202, 160

    2009

  17. [25]

    2025, Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2025-N12

    Denneau , L., Siverd , R., Tonry , J., et al. 2025, Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2025-N12

    2025

  18. [26]

    2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 133

    Fitzsimmons , A., Snodgrass , C., Rozitis , B., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 133

    2018

  19. [27]

    Gaia Collaboration , Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., et al. 2016, , 595, A1

    2016

  20. [28]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A1

    2023

  21. [29]

    2011, in Journ \'e es Syst \`e mes de R \'e f \'e rence Spatio-temporels 2010, ed

    Giorgini , J. 2011, in Journ \'e es Syst \`e mes de R \'e f \'e rence Spatio-temporels 2010, ed. N. Capitaine , 87--87

    2011

  22. [30]

    Giorgini , J. D. 2015, in IAU General Assembly, Vol. 29, 2256293

    2015

  23. [31]

    J., Dorsey , R

    Hopkins , M. J., Dorsey , R. C., Forbes , J. C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.05318

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    & Seligman , D

    Jewitt , D. & Seligman , D. Z. 2023, , 61, 197

    2023

  25. [33]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.12234

    Kareta , T., Champagne , C., McClure , L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.12234

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Landolt , A. U. 1992, , 104, 340

    1992

  27. [35]

    W., Mierle , K., Blanton , M., & Roweis , S

    Lang , D., Hogg , D. W., Mierle , K., Blanton , M., & Roweis , S. 2010, , 139, 1782

    2010

  28. [36]

    2000, , 119, 3133

    Licandro , J., Serra-Ricart , M., Oscoz , A., Casas , R., & Osip , D. 2000, , 119, 3133

    2000

  29. [37]

    2017, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 1, 21

    Mamajek , E. 2017, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 1, 21

    2017

  30. [38]

    J., Weryk , R., Micheli , M., et al

    Meech , K. J., Weryk , R., Micheli , M., et al. 2017, , 552, 378

    2017

  31. [39]

    J., et al

    Micheli , M., Farnocchia , D., Meech , K. J., et al. 2018, , 559, 223

    2018

  32. [40]

    Nissen , P. E. 2004, in Origin and Evolution of the Elements, ed. A. McWilliam & M. Rauch , 154

    2004

  33. [41]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.05226

    Opitom , C., Snodgrass , C., Jehin , E., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.05226

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    M., Tatsumi , E., Licandro , J., et al

    Popescu , M. M., Tatsumi , E., Licandro , J., et al. 2025, PSJ, 6, 42

    2025

  35. [43]

    Press , W. H. & Rybicki , G. B. 1989, , 338, 277

    1989

  36. [44]

    Schleicher , D. G. 2010, , 140, 973

    2010

  37. [45]

    Schleicher , D. G. & Bair , A. N. 2011, , 141, 177

    2011

  38. [46]

    Z., Micheli , M., Farnocchia , D., et al

    Seligman , D. Z., Micheli , M., Farnocchia , D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.02757

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Taylor , A. G. & Seligman , D. Z. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.08111

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    L., Denneau , L., Heinze , A

    Tonry , J. L., Denneau , L., Heinze , A. N., et al. 2018, , 130, 064505

    2018

  41. [49]

    2025, Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2025-N44

    Valdes , F., :unkn , Valvasori , A., et al. 2025, Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2025-N44

    2025

  42. [50]

    Williams , G. V. 2017, Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2017-V17

    2017

  43. [51]

    Z., Collaboration , Z

    Ye , Q. Z., Collaboration , Z. T. F., Abdelaziz , A. M., et al. 2025 a , Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2025-N35

    2025

  44. [52]

    Z., Collaboration , Z

    Ye , Q. Z., Collaboration , Z. T. F., Lee , H. J., et al. 2025 b , Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2025-N22

    2025

  45. [53]

    Z., Collaboration , Z

    Ye , Q. Z., Collaboration , Z. T. F., Serrau , M., et al. 2025 c , Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2025-O05

    2025

  46. [54]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sent...

  47. [55]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.