Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Irrational CFTs from coupled anyon chains with non-invertible symmetries?

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Three coupled golden anyon chains stabilize a conformal phase with central charge c=2.10±0.03 that the authors propose as a candidate irrational CFT.

desk verdict A credible candidate irrational-CFT construction whose central claim still needs a system-size convergence study before the N=3 phase is called critical. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.14280 v4 pith:FQ7CADR7 submitted 2025-07-18 hep-th cond-mat.str-el

António Antunes , Junchen Rong This is my paper
classification hep-thcond-mat.str-el PACS 11.25.Hf
keywords irrationalconformalfieldtheorygoldenanyonchainFibonaccianyonsnon-invertiblesymmetrytensornetworkDMRGtricriticalIsingmodelperturbationcoupledPottsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that an irrational conformal field theory — a scale-invariant quantum theory with a discrete but infinite list of primary operators and no conserved currents beyond the stress tensor — can appear as a stable conformal phase of a lattice model without fine-tuning. The model couples $N\geq 3$ golden anyon chains, each of which alone flows to the tricritical Ising CFT, through a single interaction that preserves $N$ copies of the Fibonacci non-invertible symmetry. For $N=3$, tensor-network DMRG finds a critical phase at $K/J\approx 0.25$ with dynamical exponent $z=1$ and central charge $c=2.10\pm 0.03$, matching the perturbative estimate $c_{\mathrm{IR}}\approx 2.09$. Because a survey of known rational CFTs with $1

What carries the argument

The central object is the coupled golden-anyon Hamiltonian $H=J\sum_i\sum_a H_i^{(a)}+K\sum_i\sum_{a\neq b}H_i^{(a)}H_i^{(b)}$, built from copies of the golden anyon chain, whose non-factorizable Hilbert space is the fusion space of Fibonacci anyons with $\tau\times\tau=1+\tau$. The golden chain makes the Fibonacci non-invertible symmetry an exact microscopic symmetry, and the $K$ term couples copies through the $\sigma'\sigma'$ operator of scaling dimension $7/4$. For $N\geq 3$ this operator generates a one-loop fixed point at small $K$ ($K_*\approx 0.07$), and the c-theorem sum rule converts that fixed point into the central-charge estimate $c_{\mathrm{IR}}\approx 2.09$. The paper reads off conformal data through the state-operator correspondence and the entanglement-entropy law $S=(c/3)\log l_{\mathrm{conformal}}$.

What would settle it

Compute the effective central charge as a function of system size at $K/J\approx 0.25$ for $L=16,20,24,32,40$ with comparable bond dimension: if $c_{\mathrm{eff}}$ does not saturate but continues to drift (the pattern that exposed the $N=2$ pseudo-critical phase), the proposed conformal phase is a weakly first-order walking regime. Conversely, finding a conserved current of spin $>2$ in a fixed-momentum spectrum would immediately show the theory is rational.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the $N=3$ coupled anyon chain at $J>0$, $K/J\approx 0.25$, flows to a previously unknown conformal field theory with $c=2.10\pm 0.03$ and $z=1$. In field-theory language the model is the deformation $S=\sum_a S^{(a)}_{\mathrm{tri\text{-}Ising}}+K\int d^2x\,\sum_{a\neq b}\sigma'^{(a)}\sigma'^{(b)}$, for which one-loop conformal perturbation theory has an infrared fixed point at small $K$ with $c_{\mathrm{IR}}\approx 2.09$. The conformal phase is identified in DMRG entanglement-entropy data at length $L=24$ and bond dimension $\chi=2400$, supported by the linear (i.e. $z=1$) scaling of the ground-state energy. The authors further build an extensive list of rational CFTs from coset constructions and argue that none carries the $((\mathrm{Fibonacci})^3\rtimes S_3)$ symmetry of the model, so they conjecture the fixed point is irrational. The same mechanism is conjectured to yield irrational CFTs for all $N\geq 3$, and a parallel analysis for $N=2$ maps the phase diagram including one identified coset CFT.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the DMRG data at $L=24$ with bond dimension $\chi=2400$ represents an infinite critical system; the paper itself concedes that this data cannot rigorously exclude an extremely weak first-order transition, and an earlier version of the paper made exactly that misidentification for the $N=3$ model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim is correct, the short RG flow from three decoupled tricritical Ising models ($c=2.1$) ends at a new CFT with $c\approx 2.09$–$2.10$, the first explicit lattice realization of an irrational CFT with a discrete spectrum.
  • The same one-loop mechanism is conjectured to produce irrational CFTs for every $N\geq 3$ coupled tricritical Ising chains, and for $N\geq 2$ coupled Potts chains, with the large-$N$ limit controlled by double-trace deformations.
  • For $N=2$, the phase diagram is settled in broad brush: the $K<0$ side of the $J>0$ line is a weakly first-order walking transition rather than a CFT, while the $J<0$ side contains a $c=1.6$ conformal phase, an unidentified $c\approx 1.77$ critical point, and the coset CFT $(\mathrm{SU}(2)_3\times\mathrm{SU}(2)_3)/\mathrm{SU}(2)_6$ with $c=1.35$.
  • The non-invertible symmetry itself becomes a diagnostic: a spontaneously broken Fibonacci symmetry would require extra vacua, since $n^2=1+n$ has no non-negative integer solution, so the observed one-dimensional vacuum sectors support the identification of the candidate fixed points.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A cheaper check than full spectrum extraction would be a system-size study of the effective central charge at $K/J\approx 0.25$, mirroring the $N=2$ analysis that exposed the pseudo-critical phase; if $c_{\mathrm{eff}}$ keeps drifting rather than saturating, the $N=3$ phase is likely the same kind of walking transition rather than a true CFT.
  • If the phase is genuinely irrational, its conjectured positive twist gap makes it a natural target for a modular bootstrap that imposes the Fibonacci$^3$ non-invertible symmetry, which would independently constrain $c$ and the operator spectrum.
  • The same anyon-chain construction could be run with other non-invertible fusion categories, such as the Haagerup category mentioned in the introduction, to look for families of irrational CFTs with controlled symmetries and test whether the mechanism is specific to Fibonacci anyons.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies N=2 and N=3 coupled golden anyon chains with non-invertible Fibonacci symmetries, using DMRG to map out phase diagrams and extract conformal data. For N=2, it identifies a weakly first-order pseudo-critical region, a conformal phase of decoupled Potts models, and two special CFTs, one of which is identified as (SU(2)_3 x SU(2)_3)/SU(2)_6. For N=3, the paper claims a stable conformal phase for K/J>0 with central charge c=2.10±0.03 and dynamical exponent z=1, proposes that this is an irrational CFT, and supports the claim with a one-loop conformal-perturbation-theory estimate c_IR≈2.088 and with a catalogue of known RCFTs that appear not to match.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper provides a concrete lattice realization of a compact irrational CFT with non-invertible symmetry, which would be an important step in the field. The N=2 analysis is a useful contribution on its own, particularly the detailed demonstration that a superficially critical phase is actually weakly first order (Fig. 16), and the explicit identification of the relevant singlet in the coset CFT (Appendix A.1) is a nice analytic result. The paper is also transparent about the limitations of the N=3 numerics, and the c_IR estimate is derived from standard OPE data rather than fitted to the DMRG result, so the numerical/perturbative agreement is a genuine cross-check. However, as detailed below, the evidence for the N=3 conformal phase is not yet sufficient for the central claim to be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Fig. 22, Eq. (3.8)] The claim of a stable conformal phase at K/J=0.25 with c=2.10±0.03 is based on a single system size L=24 and bond dimension χ=2400, with the five smallest-l points discarded. The paper itself states that this "cannot rigorously exclude an extremely weak first-order scenario," and the note added reports that a similar misidentification was made for N=3 in an earlier version. The N=2 pseudo-critical phase in Sec. 2.2 was recognized only by studying c_eff as a function of system size (Fig. 16); no analogous finite-size or bond-dimension convergence study is presented for N=3. Please provide such a study, or soften the claim to a candidate/pseudo-critical phase.
  2. [Introduction, p. 4; Sec. 3.2, p. 22] The introduction states "For N=3, there is once again a weakly first-order phase transition for J>0 and K<0," while Sec. 3.2 says "In the K/J<0 region, the effective central decreases sharply, indicating that this is a gapped phase." These statements are contradictory, and neither the text nor the abstract explains which is correct. Please reconcile the phase diagram description; if the K<0 region is gapped, the introduction and abstract need to be corrected.
  3. [Sec. 3.1, Eqs. (3.5)-(3.7)] The one-loop beta function and the c-theorem estimate c_IR≈2.088 are computed in a perturbation theory that the paper itself describes as "uncontrolled" (epsilon=1/4). The existence of the IR fixed point is an assumption of this computation, not a conclusion, so the agreement with the DMRG value of c=2.10±0.03 does not by itself exclude a weakly first-order transition. This concern is not a circularity: the estimates are independent of the numerical fit, but they cannot provide the missing certification of criticality. Please state this limitation explicitly when the central claim is made.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3.6)] Please clarify the normalization of the OPE coefficient C^K_KK in Eq. (3.6); the standard Cardy sum-rule contains a factor 3/2 that appears to be absent as written.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, p. 23] "Lorentzian symmetric conformal field theory" should read "Lorentz-invariant" or "relativistic" CFT.
  3. [Figs. 20 and 21] Please state exactly how many points were dropped in the fits that produce the c_eff values plotted, since the final result depends on this choice; the text mentions this dependence but does not quantify it for the N=3 phase diagram.
  4. [Sec. 4, p. 25] There is a typo "finitely values of the rank" and "one-self" in the first paragraph; these should be corrected.
  5. [Sec. 1.2, Eq. (1.11)] The conjecture mapping the lattice operator to σ′ is central to the interpretation of Fig. 4; please add one sentence summarizing the evidence (data collapse with Δ_σ and Δ_σ′) that supports this identification.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the c_IR≈2.088 estimate is an independent perturbative cross-check for the DMRG c≈2.10; the minor self-citations are not load-bearing and the main weakness is finite-size extrapolation, not a reduction of the prediction to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is: (1) the single golden anyon chain is verified (with external results and its own data collapse, Sec. 1.2) to flow to the tricritical Ising CFT; (2) the K-term of (0.3) is identified with the σ′σ′ perturbation of (0.5), using the checked identification of H_i with σ′; (3) one-loop conformal perturbation theory with the standard tricritical Ising OPE gives an IR fixed point K*=√3/(8π) and, via the Cardy c-theorem sum rule, c_IR≈2.088; (4) DMRG at K/J=0.25 gives c=2.10±0.03 and z=1. Step (3) is not fit to step (4): the OPE coefficients are standard CFT data and the lattice point is selected inside the observed plateau, not tuned to the perturbative value, so the agreement is a genuine cross-check. The irrationality conjecture is further supported, not proven, by the Sec. 4 scan of known RCFTs, which argues that no listed rational theory realizes ((Fib)^3⋊S_3) via Verlinde lines. Refs [16,17] and [74] include a current author, but they are used only as peripheral motivation and future outlook, and are not load-bearing for the N=3 claim. The paper's own admission that finite-size DMRG 'cannot rigorously exclude an extremely weak first-order scenario' and the Note added about a previous misidentification are soundness concerns about the L=24 extrapolation, not evidence that the c_IR prediction is equivalent to the numerical input. No equation or fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim inherits the single-chain universality of the golden anyon model, the operator correspondence (1.11), the one-loop OPE data, and the small-size DMRG extrapolation. No new parameters are fit to produce the fixed point, and no new particles or mediators are postulated. The main burden falls on the extrapolation from L=24 data, which the paper itself flags.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Single golden anyon chain flows to tricritical Ising CFT for J>0 and to 3-state Potts CFT for J<0.
    Taken from [19] and used throughout Sections 1 and 2 to set up the coupled-chain actions (0.5) and (0.7).
  • ad hoc to paper The lattice operator (-1)^i H_i realizes the sigma-prime primary of tricritical Ising (Eq. 1.11).
    Conjectured mapping, supported by data collapsing in Fig. 4; needed to connect the lattice coupling to the continuum action (0.5).
  • standard math Standard OPE data of tricritical Ising, including the combinatorial factor 6 and the sqrt(3) normalization, used in the beta function (3.5).
    Standard CFT data of the tricritical Ising model; the one-loop fixed point K* ~ 0.07 depends on it.
  • ad hoc to paper One-loop conformal perturbation theory with epsilon = 1/4 is reliable enough to predict an IR fixed point.
    Section 3.1 calls the expansion 'uncontrolled' because the perturbing operator has dimension 7/4, i.e. epsilon = 1/4.
  • ad hoc to paper The finite-size ansatz EE(t)=a exp(-2 omega t)+c t+b (Eq. B.4) extracts the central charge from DMRG at L=24.
    The ansatz is tested on a single chain (Fig. 24), but the N=3 extraction drops small-l points and has no independent check.
  • domain assumption The non-invertible lattice symmetry C = (Fibonacci)^N ⋊ S_N is not spontaneously broken and protects the fixed point.
    Stated in footnote 5 and Section 0; it is why the fixed point is reached without additional tuning.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Irrational CFTs from coupled anyon chains with non-invertible symmetries?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FQ7CADR7

@misc{pith2026250714280,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Irrational CFTs from coupled anyon chains with non-invertible symmetries?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FQ7CADR7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.14280}
}
abstract

Irrational CFTs in 1+1d with a discrete spectrum and no conserved currents other than the stress-tensor are expected to be generic, unsolvable by standard methods, and hard to construct explicitly. We introduce a lattice model that realizes a candidate for such a CFT as a conformal phase of matter without fine-tuning. The model is constructed by coupling $N\geq3$ golden anyon chains together, preserving $N$ copies of the Fibonacci non-invertible symmetry. We use the MPS/DMRG approach to study this model numerically, which allows us to calculate the corresponding conformal data, obtaining hints of its irrationality. Along the way, we characterize the phase diagram for $N=2$ coupled chains where we identify a weakly first-order phase transition as well as critical points that we are able to identify with known rational CFTs, except for one case. We also provide an extensive list of rational CFTs with $1<c<2.1$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Descending into the Modular Bootstrap

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Numerical search finds candidate modular-invariant spectra with integer degeneracies for 1 < c < 8/7 and hints at a stronger gap bound near c = 1.

  2. Phase transitions in coupled Ising chains and SO($N$)-symmetric spin chains

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The order-disorder transition in N coupled Ising CFTs is continuous for N=2,3 (Ising and four-state Potts universality) but first-order for all N≥4.

  3. A systematic search for conformal field theories in very small spaces

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A symmetry-free entropy search on four-site states recovers known CFTs and yields unclassified candidate CFTs with 1<c<2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Toward Classification of Conformal Theories,

    C. Vafa, “Toward Classification of Conformal Theories,”Phys. Lett. B206(1988) 421–426

    1988

  2. [2]

    Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,

    A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B241(1984) 333–380

    1984

  3. [3]

    Non-Invertible Symmetry in Calabi-Yau Conformal Field Theories

    C. Cordova and G. Rizi, “Non-invertible symmetry in Calabi-Yau conformal field theories,” JHEP01(2025) 045,arXiv:2312.17308 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    A Universal Inequality for CFT and Quantum Gravity,

    S. Hellerman, “A Universal Inequality for CFT and Quantum Gravity,”JHEP08(2011) 130,arXiv:0902.2790 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2011

  5. [5]

    Modular Bootstrap Revisited,

    S. Collier, Y.-H. Lin, and X. Yin, “Modular Bootstrap Revisited,”JHEP09(2018) 061, arXiv:1608.06241 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Light Cone Bootstrap in General 2D CFTs and Entanglement from Light Cone Singularity,

    Y. Kusuki, “Light Cone Bootstrap in General 2D CFTs and Entanglement from Light Cone Singularity,”JHEP01(2019) 025,arXiv:1810.01335 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Light-cone modular bootstrap and pure gravity,

    N. Benjamin, H. Ooguri, S.-H. Shao, and Y. Wang, “Light-cone modular bootstrap and pure gravity,”Phys. Rev. D100no. 6, (2019) 066029,arXiv:1906.04184 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Universal dynamics of heavy operators in CFT2,

    S. Collier, A. Maloney, H. Maxfield, and I. Tsiares, “Universal dynamics of heavy operators in CFT2,”JHEP07(2020) 074,arXiv:1912.00222 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    Twist Accumulation in Conformal Field Theory: A Rigorous Approach to the Lightcone Bootstrap,

    S. Pal, J. Qiao, and S. Rychkov, “Twist Accumulation in Conformal Field Theory: A Rigorous Approach to the Lightcone Bootstrap,”Commun. Math. Phys.402no. 3, (2023) 2169–2214,arXiv:2212.04893 [hep-th]

    2023

  2. [10]

    Lightcone Modular Bootstrap and Tauberian Theory: A Cardy-Like Formula for Near-Extremal Black Holes,

    S. Pal and J. Qiao, “Lightcone Modular Bootstrap and Tauberian Theory: A Cardy-Like Formula for Near-Extremal Black Holes,”Annales Henri Poincare26no. 3, (2025) 787–844, arXiv:2307.02587 [hep-th]. – 32 –

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    A universal inequality on the unitary 2D CFT partition function,

    I. Dey, S. Pal, and J. Qiao, “A universal inequality on the unitary 2D CFT partition function,”JHEP07(2025) 163,arXiv:2410.18174 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Universality of the microcanonical entropy at large spin,

    S. Pal, J. Qiao, and B. C. van Rees, “Universality of the microcanonical entropy at large spin,”arXiv:2505.02897 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Quantum Gravity Partition Functions in Three Dimensions,

    A. Maloney and E. Witten, “Quantum Gravity Partition Functions in Three Dimensions,” JHEP02(2010) 029,arXiv:0712.0155 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Universal Spectrum of 2d Conformal Field Theory in the Large c Limit,

    T. Hartman, C. A. Keller, and B. Stoica, “Universal Spectrum of 2d Conformal Field Theory in the Large c Limit,”JHEP09(2014) 118,arXiv:1405.5137 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Coupled Potts models: Self-duality and fixed point structure,

    V. Dotsenko, J. L. Jacobsen, M.-A. Lewis, and M. Picco, “Coupled Potts models: Self-duality and fixed point structure,”Nucl. Phys. B546(1999) 505–557,arXiv:cond-mat/9812227

    1999 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Coupled Minimal Conformal Field Theory Models Revisited,

    A. Antunes and C. Behan, “Coupled Minimal Conformal Field Theory Models Revisited,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130no. 7, (2023) 071602,arXiv:2211.16503 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Coupled minimal models revisited II: Constraints from permutation symmetry,

    A. Antunes and C. Behan, “Coupled minimal models revisited II: Constraints from permutation symmetry,”SciPost Phys.18no. 4, (2025) 132,arXiv:2412.21107 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Renormalization Group and Perturbation Theory Near Fixed Points in Two-Dimensional Field Theory,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Renormalization Group and Perturbation Theory Near Fixed Points in Two-Dimensional Field Theory,”Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.46(1987) 1090

    1987

  11. [19]

    Interacting anyons in topological quantum liquids: The golden chain,

    A. Feiguin, S. Trebst, A. W. W. Ludwig, M. Troyer, A. Kitaev, Z. Wang, and M. H. Freedman, “Interacting anyons in topological quantum liquids: The golden chain,”Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 160409,arXiv:cond-mat/0612341

    2007 arXiv

  12. [20]

    What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    S.-H. Shao, “What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries,”arXiv:2308.00747 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Majorana chain and Ising model - (non-invertible) translations, anomalies, and emanant symmetries,

    N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao, “Majorana chain and Ising model - (non-invertible) translations, anomalies, and emanant symmetries,”SciPost Phys.16no. 3, (2024) 064, arXiv:2307.02534 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Numerical Evidence for a Haagerup Conformal Field Theory,

    T.-C. Huang, Y.-H. Lin, K. Ohmori, Y. Tachikawa, and M. Tezuka, “Numerical Evidence for a Haagerup Conformal Field Theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128no. 23, (2022) 231603, arXiv:2110.03008 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Integrable and critical Haagerup spin chains,

    L. Corcoran and M. de Leeuw, “Integrable and critical Haagerup spin chains,”Phys. Rev. B 111no. 14, (2025) L140408,arXiv:2410.16356 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Construction of a Gapless Phase with Haagerup Symmetry,

    L. E. Bottini and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Construction of a Gapless Phase with Haagerup Symmetry,”Phys. Rev. Lett.134no. 19, (2025) 191602,arXiv:2410.19040 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    A 2D-CFT Factory: Critical Lattice Models from Competing Anyon Condensation Processes in SymTO/SymTFT,

    L.-Y. Hung, K. Ji, C. Shen, Y. Wan, and Y. Zhao, “A 2D-CFT Factory: Critical Lattice Models from Competing Anyon Condensation Processes in SymTO/SymTFT,” arXiv:2506.05324 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Noninvertible Symmetries, Anomalies, and Scattering Amplitudes,

    C. Copetti, L. Cordova, and S. Komatsu, “Noninvertible Symmetries, Anomalies, and Scattering Amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.133no. 18, (2024) 181601,arXiv:2403.04835 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Infinitely many new renormalization group flows between Virasoro minimal models from non-invertible symmetries,

    Y. Nakayama and T. Tanaka, “Infinitely many new renormalization group flows between Virasoro minimal models from non-invertible symmetries,”JHEP11(2024) 137, arXiv:2407.21353 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Minimal Model Renormalization Group Flows: Noninvertible – 33 – Symmetries and Nonperturbative Description,

    F. Ambrosino and S. Negro, “Minimal Model Renormalization Group Flows: Noninvertible – 33 – Symmetries and Nonperturbative Description,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135no. 2, (2025) 021602, arXiv:2501.07511 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang, and X. Yin, “Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,”JHEP01(2019) 026, arXiv:1802.04445 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Conformal invariance and universality in finite-size scaling,

    J. L. Cardy, “Conformal invariance and universality in finite-size scaling,”Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General17no. 7, (May, 1984) L385. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/17/7/003

    1984 doi

  23. [31]

    Conformal invariance, the central charge, and universal finite-size amplitudes at criticality,

    H. W. J. Bl¨ ote, J. L. Cardy, and M. P. Nightingale, “Conformal invariance, the central charge, and universal finite-size amplitudes at criticality,”Phys. Rev. Lett.56(Feb, 1986) 742–745.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.742

    1986 doi

  24. [32]

    Operator content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories,

    J. L. Cardy, “Operator content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories,”Nuclear Physics B270(1986) 186–204. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0550321386905523

    1986

  25. [33]

    The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calculations,

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, “The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calculations,”SciPost Phys. Codebases(2022) 4. https://scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.4

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    Codebase release 0.3 for ITensor,

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, “Codebase release 0.3 for ITensor,” SciPost Phys. Codebases(2022) 4–r0.3. https://scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.4-r0.3

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    Temperley-Lieb integrable models and fusion categories,

    M. Blakeney, L. Corcoran, M. de Leeuw, B. Pozsgay, and E. Vernier, “Temperley-Lieb integrable models and fusion categories,”arXiv:2510.19902 [cond-mat.str-el]

  28. [36]

    A short introduction to fibonacci anyon models,

    S. Trebst, M. Troyer, Z. Wang, and A. W. W. Ludwig, “A short introduction to fibonacci anyon models,”Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement176(2008) 384–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.176.384

    2008 doi

  29. [37]

    Beyond paired quantum Hall states: Parafermions and incompressible states in the first excited Landau level,

    N. Read and E. Rezayi, “Beyond paired quantum Hall states: Parafermions and incompressible states in the first excited Landau level,”Phys. Rev. B59(1999) 8084, arXiv:cond-mat/9809384

    1999 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Topological Quantum Computation,

    M. H. Freedman, A. Kitaev, M. J. Larsen, and Z. Wang, “Topological Quantum Computation,”arXiv:quant-ph/0101025

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems,

    M. Cheng and N. Seiberg, “Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems,”SciPost Phys.15no. 2, (2023) 051,arXiv:2211.12543 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model,

    D. Aasen, R. S. K. Mong, and P. Fendley, “Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model,”J. Phys. A49no. 35, (2016) 354001,arXiv:1601.07185 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Topological Defects on the Lattice: Dualities and Degeneracies,

    D. Aasen, P. Fendley, and R. S. K. Mong, “Topological Defects on the Lattice: Dualities and Degeneracies,”arXiv:2008.08598 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2008 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Universal finite-size amplitude and anomalous entangment entropy ofz= 2 quantum lifshitz criticalities in topological chains,

    K. Wang and T. Sedrakyan, “Universal finite-size amplitude and anomalous entangment entropy ofz= 2 quantum lifshitz criticalities in topological chains,”SciPost Physics12 no. 4, (Apr., 2022) .http://dx.doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.4.134

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    Fusion rules for permutation extensions of modular tensor categories,

    C. Delaney, “Fusion rules for permutation extensions of modular tensor categories,” 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03003. – 34 –

    2019 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Generalized Symmetries and Deformations of Symmetric Product Orbifolds,

    N. Benjamin, S. Bintanja, Y.-J. Chen, M. Gutperle, C. Luo, and D. Rathore, “Generalized Symmetries and Deformations of Symmetric Product Orbifolds,”arXiv:2509.12180 [hep-th]

  37. [45]

    Critical points in coupled Potts models and critical phases in coupled loop models,

    P. Fendley and J. L. Jacobsen, “Critical points in coupled Potts models and critical phases in coupled loop models,”J. Phys. A41(2008) 215001,arXiv:0803.2618 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2008 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Non compact continuum limit of two coupled potts models,

    E. Vernier, J. L. Jacobsen, and H. Saleur, “Non compact continuum limit of two coupled potts models,”Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2014no. 10, (Oct.,

  39. [47]

    Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs II. Two-dimensional Potts model atQ >4,

    V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, “Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs II. Two-dimensional Potts model atQ >4,”SciPost Phys.5no. 5, (2018) 050, arXiv:1808.04380 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs,

    V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, “Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs,”JHEP10(2018) 108,arXiv:1807.11512 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Integrability of coupled conformal field theories,

    A. LeClair, A. Ludwig, and G. Mussardo, “Integrability of coupled conformal field theories,” Nuclear Physics B512no. 3, (1998) 523–542. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321397007244

    1998

  42. [50]

    Virasoro Algebras and Coset Space Models,

    P. Goddard, A. Kent, and D. I. Olive, “Virasoro Algebras and Coset Space Models,”Phys. Lett. B152(1985) 88–92

    1985

  43. [51]

    Unitary Representations of the Virasoro and Supervirasoro Algebras,

    P. Goddard, A. Kent, and D. I. Olive, “Unitary Representations of the Virasoro and Supervirasoro Algebras,”Commun. Math. Phys.103(1986) 105–119

    1986

  44. [52]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997

    1997

  45. [53]

    The Random-Bond Ising Model in 2.01 and 3 Dimensions,

    Z. Komargodski and D. Simmons-Duffin, “The Random-Bond Ising Model in 2.01 and 3 Dimensions,”J. Phys. A50no. 15, (2017) 154001,arXiv:1603.04444 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    From O(3) to Cubic CFT: Conformal Perturbation and the Large Charge Sector,

    J. Rong and N. Su, “From O(3) to Cubic CFT: Conformal Perturbation and the Large Charge Sector,”arXiv:2311.00933 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory,”JETP Lett.43(1986) 730–732

    1986

  48. [56]

    The Central Charge and Universal Combinations of Amplitudes in Two-dimensional Theories Away From Criticality,

    J. L. Cardy, “The Central Charge and Universal Combinations of Amplitudes in Two-dimensional Theories Away From Criticality,”Phys. Rev. Lett.60(1988) 2709

    1988

  49. [57]

    Seeking fixed points in multiple coupling scalar theories in theϵ expansion,

    H. Osborn and A. Stergiou, “Seeking fixed points in multiple coupling scalar theories in theϵ expansion,”JHEP05(2018) 051,arXiv:1707.06165 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Heavy handed quest for fixed points in multiple coupling scalar theories in theϵexpansion,

    H. Osborn and A. Stergiou, “Heavy handed quest for fixed points in multiple coupling scalar theories in theϵexpansion,”JHEP04(2021) 128,arXiv:2010.15915 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    On the Classification of Rational Conformal Field Theories,

    S. D. Mathur, S. Mukhi, and A. Sen, “On the Classification of Rational Conformal Field Theories,”Phys. Lett. B213(1988) 303–308

    1988

  52. [60]

    Classification of Unitary RCFTs with Two Primaries and Central Charge Less Than 25,

    S. Mukhi and B. C. Rayhaun, “Classification of Unitary RCFTs with Two Primaries and Central Charge Less Than 25,”Commun. Math. Phys.401no. 2, (2023) 1899–1949, arXiv:2208.05486 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Aspects of Two-Dimensional Conformal Field Theories,

    X. Yin, “Aspects of Two-Dimensional Conformal Field Theories,”PoST ASI2017(2017) 003. – 35 –

    2017

  54. [62]

    Maverick examples of coset conformal field theories,

    D. C. Dunbar and K. G. Joshi, “Maverick examples of coset conformal field theories,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A8(1993) 2803–2814,arXiv:hep-th/9309093

    1993 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Parafermionic Currents in the Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory and Selfdual Critical Points in Z(n) Invariant Statistical Systems,

    V. A. Fateev and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Parafermionic Currents in the Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory and Selfdual Critical Points in Z(n) Invariant Statistical Systems,”Sov. Phys. JETP62(1985) 215–225

    1985

  56. [64]

    Parafermionic theory with the symmetry Z(5),

    V. S. Dotsenko, J. L. Jacobsen, and R. Santachiara, “Parafermionic theory with the symmetry Z(5),”Nucl. Phys. B656(2003) 259–324,arXiv:hep-th/0212158

    2003 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Infinite Additional Symmetries in Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Infinite Additional Symmetries in Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory,”Theor. Math. Phys.65(1985) 1205–1213

    1985

  58. [66]

    Parafermionic theory with the symmetry Z(N), for N even,

    V. S. Dotsenko, J. L. Jacobsen, and R. Santachiara, “Parafermionic theory with the symmetry Z(N), for N even,”Nucl. Phys. B679(2004) 464–494,arXiv:hep-th/0310131

    2004 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Parafermionic theory with the symmetry Z(N), for N odd,

    V. S. Dotsenko, J. L. Jacobsen, and S. Raoul, “Parafermionic theory with the symmetry Z(N), for N odd,”Nucl. Phys. B664(2003) 477–511,arXiv:hep-th/0303126

    2003 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Coset Construction for Extended Virasoro Algebras,

    F. A. Bais, P. Bouwknegt, M. Surridge, and K. Schoutens, “Coset Construction for Extended Virasoro Algebras,”Nucl. Phys. B304(1988) 371–391

    1988

  61. [69]

    A measure on the space of CFTs and pure 3D gravity,

    A. Belin, A. Maloney, and F. Seefeld, “A measure on the space of CFTs and pure 3D gravity,”arXiv:2509.04554 [hep-th]

  62. [70]

    Conformal data and renormalization group flow in critical quantum spin chains using periodic uniform matrix product states,

    Y. Zou, A. Milsted, and G. Vidal, “Conformal data and renormalization group flow in critical quantum spin chains using periodic uniform matrix product states,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 121no. 23, (2018) 230402,arXiv:1710.05397 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2018 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Exploiting translational invariance in matrix product state simulations of spin chains with periodic boundary conditions,

    B. Pirvu, F. Verstraete, and G. Vidal, “Exploiting translational invariance in matrix product state simulations of spin chains with periodic boundary conditions,”Phys. Rev. B83(Mar,

  64. [72]

    Double-Trace Deformations of Conformal Correlations,

    S. Giombi, V. Kirilin, and E. Perlmutter, “Double-Trace Deformations of Conformal Correlations,”JHEP02(2018) 175,arXiv:1801.01477 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Lattice Realization of Complex Conformal Field Theories: Two-Dimensional Potts Model with Q>4 States,

    J. L. Jacobsen and K. J. Wiese, “Lattice Realization of Complex Conformal Field Theories: Two-Dimensional Potts Model with Q>4 States,”Phys. Rev. Lett.133no. 7, (2024) 077101, arXiv:2402.10732 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Work in progress,

    A. Antunes, J. Jacobsen, and J. Rong, “Work in progress,”

  67. [75]

    Critical exponents and equation of state of the three-dimensional heisenberg universality class,

    M. Campostrini, M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto, P. Rossi, and E. Vicari, “Critical exponents and equation of state of the three-dimensional heisenberg universality class,”Phys. Rev. B 65(Apr, 2002) 144520.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.144520

    2002 doi

  68. [76]

    Critical behavior of the three-dimensional XY universality class,

    M. Campostrini, M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto, P. Rossi, and E. Vicari, “Critical behavior of the three-dimensional XY universality class,”Phys. Rev. B63(May, 2001) 214503. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.214503

    2001 doi

  69. [77]

    Uncovering Conformal Symmetry in the 3D Ising Transition: State-Operator Correspondence from a Quantum Fuzzy Sphere Regularization,

    W. Zhu, C. Han, E. Huffman, J. S. Hofmann, and Y.-C. He, “Uncovering Conformal Symmetry in the 3D Ising Transition: State-Operator Correspondence from a Quantum Fuzzy Sphere Regularization,”Phys. Rev. X13no. 2, (2023) 021009,arXiv:2210.13482 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2023 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Exploring replica-Potts CFTs in two dimensions,

    S. R. Kousvos, A. Piazza, and A. Vichi, “Exploring replica-Potts CFTs in two dimensions,” JHEP11(2024) 030,arXiv:2405.19416 [hep-th]. – 36 –

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Bootstrapping noninvertible symmetries,

    Y.-H. Lin and S.-H. Shao, “Bootstrapping noninvertible symmetries,”Phys. Rev. D107 no. 12, (2023) 125025,arXiv:2302.13900 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Conformal Bootstrap with Duality-Inspired Fusion Rule,

    Y. Nakayama and T. Onagi, “Conformal Bootstrap with Duality-Inspired Fusion Rule,” arXiv:2511.00386 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    Consequences of anomalous ward identities,

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Consequences of anomalous ward identities,”Physics Letters B37 no. 1, (1971) 95–97. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037026937190582X

    1971

  74. [82]

    Global Aspects of Current Algebra,

    E. Witten, “Global Aspects of Current Algebra,”Nucl. Phys. B223(1983) 422–432

    1983

  75. [83]

    Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D Conformal Field Theory,

    E. P. Verlinde, “Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D Conformal Field Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B300(1988) 360–376

    1988

  76. [84]

    Analogs for thecTheorem for Four-dimensional Renormalizable Field Theories,

    I. Jack and H. Osborn, “Analogs for thecTheorem for Four-dimensional Renormalizable Field Theories,”Nucl. Phys. B343(1990) 647–688. – 37 –

    1990

  77. [2011]

    125104.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.125104

    doi

  78. [2014]

    P10003.http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2014/10/P10003

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.