Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Evolving magnetic lives of Sun-like stars. I. Characterisation of the large-scale magnetic field with Zeeman-Doppler imaging

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Young Sun-like stars between 0.2 and 1.6 Gyr old carry large-scale magnetic fields of 1-25 G whose poloidal, toroidal, and multipolar structure varies strongly from star to star and can change within months.

desk verdict Solid, transparent ZDI paper with two genuinely new maps; the 'months-scale variability' claim in the abstract needs better support before it goes to press. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.14861 v1 pith:FQ7UZC6C submitted 2025-07-20 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP

S. Bellotti , T. Lueftinger , S. Boro Saikia , C. P. Folsom , P. Petit , J. Morin , M. Gudel , J.-F. Donati
show 1 more author
E. Alecian
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EP
keywords stars:magneticfieldactivitytechniques:polarimetricZeeman-DopplerimagingSun-likestarsstellarevolutionexoplanetspaceweatherspectropolarimetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to map the large-scale magnetic fields of young Sun-like stars and to use those maps as input for modelling the environments of orbiting exoplanets. The authors analyse spectropolarimetric observations of eleven G-type stars and reconstruct surface magnetic fields for six of them using Zeeman-Doppler imaging. The recovered fields have average strengths between 1 and 25 G and show wide diversity in poloidal, toroidal, dipolar, quadrupolar, and axisymmetric energy fractions, with two stars showing changes on month timescales. Because these field maps are the boundary conditions for stellar wind simulations, the result implies that young exoplanets are embedded in a broad variety of magnetic environments, which should translate into diverse atmospheric erosion conditions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is Zeeman-Doppler imaging (ZDI), a tomographic inversion that turns a time series of circularly polarised line profiles, enhanced by least-squares deconvolution, into a map of the photospheric magnetic field. The field is expressed as a sum of poloidal and toroidal components expanded in spherical harmonics up to degree ten, and the inversion applies maximum-entropy regularisation to find the simplest map compatible with the data. The paper also uses chromospheric activity indices ($\log R'_{\rm HK}$, H$\alpha$, Ca~II infrared triplet) and the disc-integrated longitudinal field $B_l$ to place the ZDI maps in the context of stellar activity. The resulting maps are the central object: they provide the numbers behind every claimed fraction and every trend in the paper.

What would settle it

Re-observe HD 189733 over a full rotation with dense phase coverage and re-run the ZDI inversion, or redo any of the reconstructions with an independently measured stellar inclination (for example from asteroseismology); if the poloidal, toroidal, and axisymmetry fractions move outside the paper's quoted ranges, the claimed diversity of magnetic topologies is partly an artefact of the assumptions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the large-scale fields of young Sun-like stars are not a single family. For the six stars with detectable circular polarisation, the average field strength spans 1 to 25 G, the poloidal fraction spans 40-90%, the toroidal fraction 10-60%, the dipolar fraction 30-80%, the quadrupolar fraction 10-40%, and the axisymmetric fraction 6-84%. Two stars mapped at two epochs each show the topology changing over roughly three months, and the first maps of HD 43162 and HD 114710 extend the known sample to previously unmapped parameter space. The paper interprets this diversity as the magnetic side of the early evolution of planetary habitability: planets around young Sun-like stars will experience different winds and different rates of atmospheric stripping depending on the configuration of the stellar field.

Load-bearing premise

The reconstructions assume the stars' axial orientations and the captured rotational phases are accurate enough for unbiased tomography; if the adopted inclinations or incomplete phase coverage (notably HD 189733, seen mostly between phases 0.0 and 0.5) are wrong, the reported poloidal/toroidal and multipole energy fractions would be systematically biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The six magnetic maps supply boundary conditions for the stellar wind simulations planned in the follow-up study, linking magnetic geometry directly to modelled exoplanet space weather.
  • Exoplanets around young Sun-like stars face a wide range of magnetic environments, from weak 1 G fields to 25 G fields with varying poloidal/toroidal mixes, implying different atmospheric escape histories.
  • The confirmed decline of activity indices and longitudinal field with age and rotation period supports the standard picture of a young active Sun settling into the quiet present-day Sun.
  • The two-epoch maps of HD 43162 and HD 206860 show month-scale topology changes, so single snapshots are not enough to represent a young star's magnetic environment.
  • The absence of clear trends in poloidal, dipolar, and axisymmetric fractions with age suggests that magnetic cycles and intrinsic variability add scatter that age-based scaling alone cannot capture.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the phase-coverage and inclination biases are as large as the paper's own caveats suggest, the true spread of poloidal/toroidal fractions across Sun-like stars may be narrower than the quoted 40-90% and 10-60% ranges; dense multi-epoch monitoring of the same stars would settle whether the diversity is intrinsic.
  • A testable extension is to run the planned wind simulations not with one map per star but with the two epoch maps of HD 43162 and HD 206860, to quantify how month-scale topology changes alter atmospheric erosion rates.
  • The Stokes N null-spectrum signals noted for several stars could be an instrumental artefact; if re-observation with a different spectropolarimeter shows the same Stokes V signals without matching null signals, the magnetic detections would be confirmed as astrophysical.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents a spectropolarimetric survey of eleven Sun-like stars observed with Narval in 2018–2019. For six stars with detectable circularly polarized signatures, the authors perform Zeeman-Doppler imaging to reconstruct the large-scale photospheric magnetic field, and they report activity indicators, longitudinal field measurements, and topology fractions (poloidal, toroidal, dipolar, quadrupolar, axisymmetric). The central result is a broad diversity of field strengths (1–25 G) and geometries, with poloidal fractions 40–90%, toroidal 10–60%, and evidence of short-term variability on month timescales, which the authors connect to diverse magnetic environments for orbiting exoplanets. The analysis follows the standard ZDI recipe, uses public Polarbase data, and compares several maps to earlier reconstructions.

Significance. If the quantitative ranges and the month-timescale variability claim are robust, this paper is a valuable empirical contribution to the sparse sample of large-scale magnetic maps of solar-type stars across age and rotation, and it provides boundary conditions for future wind and habitability modeling. The strengths include the use of public, reproducible data; explicit statement of ZDI input parameters; first ZDI maps for HD 43162 and HD 114710; and consistency checks against literature maps where available. The main weakness is that the quoted diversity ranges, and especially the 'short-term variability of the order of months' in the abstract, rest on comparisons whose sensitivity to phase coverage and fixed model parameters is not quantified.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §5.4] The claim of 'short-term variability of the order of months' is not quantitatively supported. The only two-epoch comparison on a month timescale is HD 43162 (2019.01 vs 2019.22), and in §5.4 the authors themselves write that the topology change 'could also be due to the scarce phase coverage affecting the 2019.01 epoch'. Since Table 2 gives no uncertainties on the energy fractions and no phase-sampling or injection-recovery test is presented, the abstract should either drop this claim or support it with a sensitivity analysis that demonstrates the epoch difference is not a sampling artifact.
  2. [Table 2 and §5.8] The topology fractions in Table 2 are reported as single numbers without uncertainties, yet §5.8 shows that adopting a literature differential rotation rate for HD 189733 changes the quadrupolar fraction from 30% to 20% while leaving other fractions nearly unchanged. A change of this size is comparable to several of the epoch-to-epoch differences quoted as variability, so the paper needs either propagated uncertainties on all Table 2 quantities or explicit robustness tests (e.g., a grid over assumed differential rotation, inclination, and phase sampling) before the ranges in the abstract can be taken at face value.
  3. [§4 and Table 1] Several stellar inclinations are derived from geometrical considerations and are capped at 70 degrees when the estimated value exceeds 80 degrees, as described in §4. The reconstructed poloidal/toroidal and axisymmetric energy fractions are known to be sensitive to the assumed inclination in ZDI, but no test of this sensitivity is presented. Given that the abstract quotes narrow ranges for these fractions (e.g., poloidal 40–90%, axisymmetry 6–84%), the authors should demonstrate that these ranges are not dominated by inclination systematics, for example by repeating reconstructions with perturbed inclinations for at least a subset of stars.
  4. [§5.8] The HD 189733 map is used as part of the sample statistics even though the rotational phase coverage was 'mostly between 0.0 and 0.5'. The paper acknowledges this limitation but does not quantify its impact on the reconstructed field strength or topology. A phase-sampling test, or at minimum an explicit statement excluding HD 189733 from any quantitative range that depends on full phase coverage, would make the central ranges more secure.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2] The phrase 'In the next following' appears to be a typo for 'In the following'.
  2. [Table C.1] The caption describes the table as listing 'median activity indices and standard deviations', but the entries are presented with ± values; please clarify whether the quoted uncertainty is the standard deviation of the measurements or the median error bar, since these are different quantities.
  3. [Appendix B] The discussion of the persistent positive Stokes N signal is thorough, but a quantitative statement (e.g., Pearson correlation coefficient between Stokes V and N amplitudes) would more convincingly support the claim that the Stokes V signal is unaffected.
  4. [§5.4] The asymmetry of the Stokes V profile of HD 43162 is attributed to vertical gradients of velocity and field strength with a reference to López Ariste (2002); adding a brief explanation of why this effect appears only for this star would help the reader.
  5. [Fig. 2] The color scale of the χ² landscapes in Fig. 2 is not described; adding a colorbar or contour labels would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: ZDI maps are direct inversions of Stokes V profiles, and the paper's self-cited tools and trend references are not load-bearing.

full rationale

After walking the derivation chain, I find no significant circularity. The central quantitative claims are the reconstructed large-scale magnetic field properties for six stars, and these are obtained by directly inverting time series of observed Stokes V LSD profiles with the maximum-entropy ZDI algorithm; the poloidal, toroidal, dipolar, quadrupolar, and axisymmetry fractions are bookkeeping summaries of the fitted spherical-harmonic coefficients rather than separately fitted parameters re-labeled as predictions. The self-cited software (zdiPy; Folsom et al. 2018) and the prior companion papers (e.g., Bellotti et al. 2025) are used as tools and context, and the maps are checked against independent literature reconstructions for HD 1835, HD 82443, HD 189733, and HD 206860, so the citations do not carry the argument alone. The paper does contain an explicit limitation on its 'short-term variability' claim: in Sect. 5.4 it states that for HD 43162 'the difference in dominant topology between the two epochs could also be due to the scarce phase coverage affecting the 2019.01 epoch,' and in Sect. 5.8 it notes that HD 189733 had phase coverage 'mostly between 0.0 and 0.5'; these are data-quality caveats that weaken the quantitative robustness of the variability and topology fractions, but they are not instances of a result being equivalent to its input by construction. The activity-age trends are presented as consistent with prior work, and gyrochronological ages are not used inside the ZDI inversion. No load-bearing step reduces, by the paper's own equations or by a self-citation chain, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests mainly on the standard ZDI inversion framework, on literature stellar parameters, and on the assumption that the unexplained Stokes N signal does not contaminate Stokes V. Six parameters are fitted or chosen during the inversion; none of them is a new physical entity. The free parameters reduce the strength of the absolute field-strength and topology numbers, which is why Table 2 lacks rigorous error bars.

free parameters (5)
  • Stellar inclination (adopted or derived) = 70 deg for HD 43162 and HD 114710; literature values elsewhere (e.g., 65+/-25 for HD 1835)
    ZDI requires inclination as input; for stars without a literature value, inclination was estimated from geometry and capped at 70 deg (Sect. 4). Latitude structure and energy fractions of reconstructed maps depend on this choice.
  • Projected equatorial velocity veq sin i for HD 43162 = 7 km/s
    Optimized via chi2 minimization over a grid, deviating from the literature value of 9.6 km/s (Valenti & Fischer 2005); see Sect. 5.4.
  • Differential rotation rate dOmega = HD 1835: 0.018+/-0.008; HD 82443: 0.114+/-0.022; HD 206860: 0.109+/-0.004 and 0.051+/-0.042; HD 189733: fixed 0.110
    Grid search over (Prot, dOmega) with 2D paraboloid fit (Sect. 4, Fig. 2); affects the ZDI forward model and the recovered map.
  • Local Stokes I Voigt profile parameters (depth, Gaussian width, Lorentzian width) = Per star in Table D.1 (e.g., HD 1835: 1.43, 0.90, 0.36)
    Optimized by chi2 minimization against the median observed Stokes I; used in the ZDI local line model (Sect. 4).
  • Target reduced chi2 = 1.1 to 2.0 depending on star and epoch
    Selected via the entropy change-rate criterion to balance fit quality against overfitting (Sect. 4, citing Alvarado-Gomez et al. 2015); directly sets the complexity of the final map.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption ZDI with maximum-entropy spherical harmonic inversion recovers the large-scale field geometry
    The work adopts zdipy and the standard maximum-entropy inversion (Skilling & Bryan 1984; Donati et al. 1997; Folsom et al. 2018), Sect. 4, without re-deriving or validating its reliability for these rotation rates.
  • domain assumption Weak-field approximation (Stokes V proportional to the derivative of Stokes I)
    Explicitly adopted in Sect. 4; standard for ZDI but an approximation that can bias strong-field or gradient regions.
  • domain assumption Literature stellar parameters (age, rotation period, effective temperature, radius) are correct
    Ages mostly from gyrochronology (Ramirez et al. 2012; Linsky et al. 2020), Sect. 2 and Table 1; trends with age inherit any systematic age errors.
  • domain assumption The unexplained Stokes N instrumental signal does not contaminate Stokes V
    Appendix B notes a persistent, unexplained Stokes N signature in the Narval data; the paper proceeds based on the absence of correlation between N and V amplitudes, but the origin is unconstrained.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evolving magnetic lives of Sun-like stars. I. Characterisation of the large-scale magnetic field with Zeeman-Doppler imaging." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FQ7UZC6C

@misc{pith2026250714861,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evolving magnetic lives of Sun-like stars. I. Characterisation of the large-scale magnetic field with Zeeman-Doppler imaging},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FQ7UZC6C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.14861}
}
abstract

Planets orbiting young, solar-type stars are embedded in a more energetic environment than that of the solar neighbourhood. They experience harsher conditions due to enhanced stellar magnetic activity and wind shaping the secular evolution of a planetary atmosphere. This study is dedicated to the characterisation of the magnetic activity of eleven Sun-like stars, with ages between 0.2 and 6.1 Gyr and rotation periods between 4.6 and 28.7 d. Based on a sub-sample of six stars, we aim to study the large-scale magnetic field, which we then use to simulate the associated stellar wind and environment. Finally, we want to determine the conditions during the early evolution of planetary habitability. We analysed high-resolution spectropolarimetric data collected in 2018 and 2019 with Narval. We computed activity diagnostics from chromospheric lines such as CaII H&K, H$\alpha$, and the CaII infrared triplet, as well as the longitudinal magnetic field from circularly polarised least-squares deconvolution profiles. For six stars exhibiting detectable circular polarisation signals, we reconstructed the large-scale magnetic field at the photospheric level by means of Zeeman-Doppler imaging (ZDI). In agreement with previous studies, we found a global decrease in the activity indices and longitudinal field with increasing age and rotation period. The large-scale magnetic field of the six sub-sample stars displays a strength between 1 and 25 G and reveals substantial contributions from different components such as poloidal (40-90 %), toroidal (10-60 %), dipolar (30-80 %), and quadrupolar (10-40 %), with distinct levels of axisymmetry (6-84 %) and short-term variability of the order of months. Ultimately, this implies that exoplanets tend to experience a broad variety of stellar magnetic environments after their formation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.14861 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Rotational evolutionary tracks computed by Johnstone et al. (2015b,a) and used in Tu et al. (2015), with our sample stars overplotted. Magenta data points indicate stars with a ZDI map both in the literature and presented in this work, cyan data points indicate stars with a first ZDI reconstruction in this work, and yellow data points indicate stars without a ZDI map. Some of the error bars are smaller than the data… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Reconstructed large-scale magnetic field map of HD 1835, HD 43162, and HD 82443 in flattened polar view. From the left, the ra￾dial, azimuthal, and meridional components of the magnetic field vector are illustrated. The radial ticks are located at the rotational phases when the observations were collected (see Eq. 1), while the concentric cir￾cles represent different stellar latitudes: -30 ◦ , +30 ◦ , and +60 ◦ (das… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Joint search of differential rotation and equatorial rotation pe￾riod for HD 1835, HD 82443, and HD 206860. The panels illustrate the χ 2 r landscape over a grid of (Prot,eq,dΩ) pairs, with the 1σ and 3σ con￾tours. The best values are obtained by fitting a 2D paraboloid around the minimum, while their error bars are estimated from the projection of the 1σ contour on the respective axis (Press et al. 1992). for 11% a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Reconstructed large-scale magnetic field map of HD 114710, HD 189733, and HD 206860 for the two epochs. The format is the same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Trends of activity indices and reconstructed magnetic field ge￾ometry with age. From the top: log R ′ HK, average magnetic field strength, poloidal fraction of the total energy, dipolar fraction of the poloidal en￾ergy, and axisymmetric fraction of the total energy. Pr…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tidal dissipation in magnetised, rotating stars and planets: linear calculations exploring various magnetic field configurations

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Magnetic field geometry, not just strength, reshapes tidal dissipation spectra in rotating convective envelopes, though frequency-averaged dissipation usually stays near the hydrodynamical prediction.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

162 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S., Barnes , R., Cohen , O., et al

    Airapetian , V. S., Barnes , R., Cohen , O., et al. 2020, International Journal of Astrobiology, 19, 136

    2020

  2. [2]

    Airapetian , V. S. & Usmanov , A. V. 2016, , 817, L24

    2016

  3. [3]

    & Vidotto , A

    Allan , A. & Vidotto , A. A. 2019, , 490, 3760

    2019

  4. [4]

    D., Cohen , O., Drake , J

    Alvarado-G \'o mez , J. D., Cohen , O., Drake , J. J., et al. 2022, , 928, 147

    2022

  5. [5]

    D., Hussain , G

    Alvarado-G \'o mez , J. D., Hussain , G. A. J., Drake , J. J., et al. 2018, , 473, 4326

    2018

  6. [6]

    D., Hussain , G

    Alvarado-G \'o mez , J. D., Hussain , G. A. J., Grunhut , J., et al. 2015, , 582, A38

    2015

  7. [7]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123

    2018

  8. [8]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

    2013

Show all 162 references
  1. [9]

    D., et al

    Bagnulo , S., Landolfi , M., Landstreet , J. D., et al. 2009, PASP, 121, 993

    2009

  2. [10]

    L., Donahue , R

    Baliunas , S. L., Donahue , R. A., Soon , W. H., et al. 1995, ApJ, 438, 269

    1995

  3. [11]

    A., et al

    Bellotti , S., Fares , R., Vidotto , A. A., et al. 2023, , 676, A139

    2023

  4. [12]

    V., et al

    Bellotti , S., Petit , P., Jeffers , S. V., et al. 2025, , 693, A269

    2025

  5. [13]

    2022, , 657, A107

    Bellotti , S., Petit , P., Morin , J., et al. 2022, , 657, A107

    2022

  6. [14]

    2016, , 586, A97

    Blaz \`e re , A., Petit , P., Ligni \`e res , F., et al. 2016, , 586, A97

    2016

  7. [15]

    S., Desidera , S., Benatti , S., et al

    Bonomo , A. S., Desidera , S., Benatti , S., et al. 2017, , 602, A107

    2017

  8. [16]

    V., Morin , J., et al

    Boro Saikia , S., Jeffers , S. V., Morin , J., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A29

    2016

  9. [17]

    V., Petit , P., et al

    Boro Saikia , S., Jeffers , S. V., Petit , P., et al. 2015, , 573, A17

    2015

  10. [18]

    P., et al

    Boro Saikia , S., Jin , M., Johnstone , C. P., et al. 2020, , 635, A178

    2020

  11. [19]

    V., et al

    Boro Saikia , S., Lueftinger , T., Jeffers , S. V., et al. 2018, , 620, L11

    2018

  12. [20]

    2005, , 444, L15

    Bouchy , F., Udry , S., Mayor , M., et al. 2005, , 444, L15

    2005

  13. [21]

    Brandenburg , A., Mathur , S., & Metcalfe , T. S. 2017, , 845, 79

    2017

  14. [22]

    L., Jeffers , S

    Brown , E. L., Jeffers , S. V., Marsden , S. C., et al. 2022, , 514, 4300

    2022

  15. [23]

    Bus \`a , I., Aznar Cuadrado , R., Terranegra , L., Andretta , V., & Gomez , M. T. 2007, , 466, 1089

    2007

  16. [24]

    A., Villarreal D'Angelo , C., & Hazra , G

    Carolan , S., Vidotto , A. A., Villarreal D'Angelo , C., & Hazra , G. 2021, , 500, 3382

    2021

  17. [25]

    2006, , 458, L13

    Cecchi-Pestellini , C., Ciaravella , A., & Micela , G. 2006, , 458, L13

    2006

  18. [26]

    2014, , 437, 879

    Chini , R., Fuhrmann , K., Barr , A., et al. 2014, , 437, 879

    2014

  19. [27]

    & Bloemen , S

    Claret , A. & Bloemen , S. 2011, A&A, 529, A75

    2011

  20. [28]

    S., Bush , T., Bryce , C., et al

    Cockell , C. S., Bush , T., Bryce , C., et al. 2016, Astrobiology, 16, 89

    2016

  21. [29]

    P., et al

    Czesla , S., Schr \"o ter , S., Schneider , C. P., et al. 2019, PyA: Python astronomy-related packages

    2019

  22. [30]

    Donati , J. F. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 307, Solar Polarization, ed. J. Trujillo-Bueno & J. Sanchez Almeida , 41

    2003

  23. [31]

    Donati , J. F. & Brown , S. F. 1997, A&A, 326, 1135

    1997

  24. [32]

    Donati , J. F. & Collier Cameron , A. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 1

    1997

  25. [33]

    F., Collier Cameron , A., & Petit , P

    Donati , J. F., Collier Cameron , A., & Petit , P. 2003, , 345, 1187

    2003

  26. [34]

    Donati , J. F. & Landstreet , J. D. 2009, Annual Review of Astronomy & Astrophysics, 47, 333

    2009

  27. [35]

    F., Mengel , M., Carter , B

    Donati , J. F., Mengel , M., Carter , B. D., et al. 2000, MNRAS, 316, 699

    2000

  28. [36]

    F., Morin , J., Petit , P., et al

    Donati , J. F., Morin , J., Petit , P., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 390, 545

    2008

  29. [37]

    F., Semel , M., Carter , B

    Donati , J. F., Semel , M., Carter , B. D., Rees , D. E., & Collier Cameron , A. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 658

    1997

  30. [38]

    Ducati , J. R. 2002, VizieR Online Data Catalog

    2002

  31. [39]

    2017, PhD thesis, Montana State University, Bozeman

    Egeland , R. 2017, PhD thesis, Montana State University, Bozeman

    2017

  32. [40]

    S., Hall , J

    Egeland , R., Metcalfe , T. S., Hall , J. C., & Henry , G. W. 2015, , 812, 12

    2015

  33. [41]

    2013, , 556, A53

    Eisenbeiss , T., Ammler-von Eiff , M., Roell , T., et al. 2013, , 556, A53

    2013

  34. [42]

    D., Marsden , S

    Evensberget , D., Carter , B. D., Marsden , S. C., Brookshaw , L., & Folsom , C. P. 2021, , 506, 2309

    2021

  35. [43]

    D., Marsden , S

    Evensberget , D., Carter , B. D., Marsden , S. C., et al. 2022, , 510, 5226

    2022

  36. [44]

    C., Carter , B

    Evensberget , D., Marsden , S. C., Carter , B. D., et al. 2023, , 524, 2042

    2023

  37. [45]

    A., et al

    Fares , R., Bourrier , V., Vidotto , A. A., et al. 2017, , 471, 1246

    2017

  38. [46]

    F., Moutou , C., et al

    Fares , R., Donati , J. F., Moutou , C., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 1383

    2009

  39. [47]

    F., Moutou , C., et al

    Fares , R., Donati , J. F., Moutou , C., et al. 2010, , 406, 409

    2010

  40. [48]

    P., Bouvier , J., Petit , P., et al

    Folsom , C. P., Bouvier , J., Petit , P., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 4956

    2018

  41. [49]

    P., Erba , C., Petit , V., et al

    Folsom , C. P., Erba , C., Petit , V., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.18476

    2025

  42. [50]

    P., \'O Fionnag \'a in , D., Fossati , L., et al

    Folsom , C. P., \'O Fionnag \'a in , D., Fossati , L., et al. 2020, , 633, A48

    2020

  43. [51]

    P., Petit , P., Bouvier , J., et al

    Folsom , C. P., Petit , P., Bouvier , J., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 580

    2016

  44. [52]

    2020, VizieR Online Data Catalog, I/350

    Gaia Collaboration . 2020, VizieR Online Data Catalog, I/350

    2020

  45. [53]

    Gaidos , E. J. 1998, , 110, 1259

    1998

  46. [54]

    E., Reid , I

    Gizis , J. E., Reid , I. N., & Hawley , S. L. 2002, AJ, 123, 3356

    2002

  47. [55]

    Gray , D. F. & Baliunas , S. L. 1997, , 475, 303

    1997

  48. [56]

    O., Corbally , C

    Gray , R. O., Corbally , C. J., Garrison , R. F., et al. 2006, , 132, 161

    2006

  49. [57]

    O., Corbally , C

    Gray , R. O., Corbally , C. J., Garrison , R. F., McFadden , M. T., & Robinson , P. E. 2003, , 126, 2048

    2003

  50. [58]

    O., Napier , M

    Gray , R. O., Napier , M. G., & Winkler , L. I. 2001, , 121, 2148

    2001

  51. [59]

    2007, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 4, 3

    G \"u del , M. 2007, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 4, 3

    2007

  52. [60]

    F., Ribas , I., & Harper , G

    Guinan , E. F., Ribas , I., & Harper , G. M. 2003, , 594, 561

    2003

  53. [61]

    2023, , 953, 70

    Gupta , S., Basak , A., & Nandy , D. 2023, , 953, 70

    2023

  54. [62]

    V., et al

    H g , E., Fabricius , C., Makarov , V. V., et al. 2000, , 355, L27

    2000

  55. [63]

    Hunter , J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  56. [64]

    Hussain , G. A. J., Collier Cameron , A., Jardine , M. M., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 189

    2009

  57. [65]

    V., Boro Saikia , S., Barnes , J

    Jeffers , S. V., Boro Saikia , S., Barnes , J. R., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, L96

    2017

  58. [66]

    V., Cameron , R

    Jeffers , S. V., Cameron , R. H., Marsden , S. C., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A152

    2022

  59. [67]

    V., Kiefer , R., & Metcalfe , T

    Jeffers , S. V., Kiefer , R., & Metcalfe , T. S. 2023, , 219, 54

    2023

  60. [68]

    P., Bartel , M., & G \"u del , M

    Johnstone , C. P., Bartel , M., & G \"u del , M. 2021, , 649, A96

    2021

  61. [69]

    u del , M., Brott , I., & L \

    Johnstone , C. P., G \"u del , M., Brott , I., & L \"u ftinger , T. 2015 a , , 577, A28

    2015

  62. [70]

    u del , M., L \

    Johnstone , C. P., G \"u del , M., L \"u ftinger , T., Toth , G., & Brott , I. 2015 b , , 577, A27

    2015

  63. [71]

    D., Taylor , B

    Joner , M. D., Taylor , B. J., Laney , C. D., & van Wyk , F. 2006, , 132, 111

    2006

  64. [72]

    Keenan , P. C. & McNeil , R. C. 1989, , 71, 245

    1989

  65. [73]

    & Poppenhaeger , K

    Ketzer , L. & Poppenhaeger , K. 2023, , 518, 1683

    2023

  66. [74]

    J., & Wehrhahn , A

    Kochukhov , O., Hackman , T., Lehtinen , J. J., & Wehrhahn , A. 2020, , 635, A142

    2020

  67. [75]

    2010, A&A, 524, A5

    Kochukhov , O., Makaganiuk , V., & Piskunov , N. 2010, A&A, 524, A5

    2010

  68. [76]

    2010, , 403, 1949

    Koen , C., Kilkenny , D., van Wyk , F., & Marang , F. 2010, , 403, 1949

    2010

  69. [77]

    Kraft , R. P. 1965, , 142, 681

    1965

  70. [78]

    N., Lammer , H., Lichtenegger , H

    Kulikov , Y. N., Lammer , H., Lichtenegger , H. I. M., et al. 2007, , 129, 207

    2007

  71. [79]

    2012, Earth, Planets and Space, 64, 179

    Lammer , H., G \"u del , M., Kulikov , Y., et al. 2012, Earth, Planets and Space, 64, 179

    2012

  72. [80]

    2003, ApJl, 598, L121

    Lammer , H., Selsis , F., Ribas , I., et al. 2003, ApJl, 598, L121

    2003

  73. [81]

    1992, Magnetic field measurements

    Landi Degl'Innocenti , E. 1992, Magnetic field measurements. , ed. F. Sanchez , M. Collados , & M. Vazquez , 71

    1992

  74. [82]

    Landstreet , J. D. 2009, in EAS Publications Series, Vol. 39, EAS Publications Series, ed. C. Neiner & J. P. Zahn , 1--20

    2009

  75. [83]

    Lehmann , L. T. & Donati , J. F. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 2333

    2022

  76. [84]

    Lehtinen , J., Jetsu , L., Hackman , T., Kajatkari , P., & Henry , G. W. 2016, , 588, A38

    2016

  77. [85]

    a pyl \"a , M. J., Olspert , N., & K \

    Lehtinen , J. J., Spada , F., K \"a pyl \"a , M. J., Olspert , N., & K \"a pyl \"a , P. J. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 658

    2020

  78. [86]

    & Bongiorno , B

    L \'e pine , S. & Bongiorno , B. 2007, , 133, 889

    2007

  79. [87]

    & Loeb , A

    Lingam , M. & Loeb , A. 2019, International Journal of Astrobiology, 18, 527

    2019

  80. [88]

    L., Wood , B

    Linsky , J. L., Wood , B. E., Youngblood , A., et al. 2020, , 902, 3

    2020

  81. [89]

    2019, , 624, A101

    Locci , D., Cecchi-Pestellini , C., & Micela , G. 2019, , 624, A101

    2019

  82. [90]

    2002, , 564, 379

    L \'o pez Ariste , A. 2002, , 564, 379

    2002

  83. [91]

    L., Patten , B

    Luhman , K. L., Patten , B. M., Marengo , M., et al. 2007, , 654, 570

    2007

  84. [92]

    C., Petit , P., Jeffers , S

    Marsden , S. C., Petit , P., Jeffers , S. V., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3517

    2014

  85. [93]

    D., Wycoff , G

    Mason , B. D., Wycoff , G. L., Hartkopf , W. I., Douglass , G. G., & Worley , C. E. 2001, , 122, 3466

    2001

  86. [94]

    2018, , 615, A116

    Mathias , P., Auri \`e re , M., L \'o pez Ariste , A., et al. 2018, , 615, A116

    2018

  87. [95]

    W., Fares , R., Marsden , S

    Mengel , M. W., Fares , R., Marsden , S. C., et al. 2016, , 459, 4325

    2016

  88. [96]

    F., Lanza , A

    Messina , S., Guinan , E. F., Lanza , A. F., & Ambruster , C. 1999, , 347, 249

    1999

  89. [97]

    1982, , 107, 31

    Middelkoop , F. 1982, , 107, 31

    1982

  90. [98]

    C., et al

    Montes , D., L \'o pez-Santiago , J., G \'a lvez , M. C., et al. 2001, , 328, 45

    2001

  91. [99]

    Moore , J. H. & Paddock , G. F. 1950, , 112, 48

    1950

  92. [100]

    2012, A&A, 540, A138

    Morgenthaler , A., Petit , P., Saar , S., et al. 2012, A&A, 540, A138

    2012

  93. [101]

    F., Savalle , R., et al

    Moutou , C., Donati , J. F., Savalle , R., et al. 2007, A&A, 473, 651

    2007

  94. [102]

    A., Chiang , E

    Murray-Clay , R. A., Chiang , E. I., & Murray , N. 2009, , 693, 23

    2009

  95. [103]

    2021, Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s

    National Academies of Sciences and Engineering, Medicine . 2021, Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s

    2021

  96. [104]

    A., Vidotto , A

    Nicholson , B. A., Vidotto , A. A., Mengel , M., et al. 2016, , 459, 1907

    2016

  97. [105]

    W., Hartmann , L

    Noyes , R. W., Hartmann , L. W., Baliunas , S. L., Duncan , D. K., & Vaughan , A. H. 1984, ApJ, 279, 763

    1984

  98. [106]

    Owen , J. E. & Jackson , A. P. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 2931

    2012

  99. [107]

    2013, , 551, L8

    Pace , G. 2013, , 551, L8

    2013

  100. [108]

    G., Collins , K

    Paegert , M., Stassun , K. G., Collins , K. A., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2108.04778

    2021 arXiv

  101. [109]

    & Micela , G

    Penz , T. & Micela , G. 2008, A&A, 479, 579

    2008

  102. [110]

    2013, in Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag, ed

    Petit , P., Auri \`e re , M., Konstantinova-Antova , R., et al. 2013, in Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag, ed. J.-P. Rozelot & C. E. . Neiner , Vol. 857, 231

    2013

  103. [111]

    K., et al

    Petit , P., Dintrans , B., Solanki , S. K., et al. 2008, , 388, 80

    2008

  104. [112]

    F., Auri \`e re , M., et al

    Petit , P., Donati , J. F., Auri \`e re , M., et al. 2005, , 361, 837

    2005

  105. [113]

    F., & Collier Cameron , A

    Petit , P., Donati , J. F., & Collier Cameron , A. 2002, MNRAS, 334, 374

    2002

  106. [114]

    2014, PASP, 126, 469

    Petit , P., Louge , T., Th \'e ado , S., et al. 2014, PASP, 126, 469

    2014

  107. [115]

    2003, , 397, 147

    Pizzolato , N., Maggio , A., Micela , G., Sciortino , S., & Ventura , P. 2003, , 397, 147

    2003

  108. [116]

    2022, , 663, A24

    Poljan c i \'c Beljan , I., Jurdana- S epi \'c , R., Jurki \'c , T., et al. 2022, , 663, A24

    2022

  109. [117]

    H., Teukolsky , S

    Press , W. H., Teukolsky , S. A., Vetterling , W. T., & Flannery , B. P. 1992, Numerical recipes in FORTRAN. The art of scientific computing

    1992

  110. [118]

    P., Kammerer , J., Defr \`e re , D., et al

    Quanz , S. P., Kammerer , J., Defr \`e re , D., et al. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10701, Optical and Infrared Interferometry and Imaging VI, ed. M. J. Creech-Eakman , P. G. Tuthill , & A. M \'e rand , 107011I

    2018

  111. [119]

    P., Ottiger , M., Fontanet , E., et al

    Quanz , S. P., Ottiger , M., Fontanet , E., et al. 2022, , 664, A21

    2022

  112. [120]

    R., Rodgers-Lee , D., & Rimmer , P

    Raeside , S. R., Rodgers-Lee , D., & Rimmer , P. B. 2025, , 697, A26

    2025

  113. [121]

    R., Lambert , D

    Ram \' rez , I., Fish , J. R., Lambert , D. L., & Allende Prieto , C. 2012, , 756, 46

    2012

  114. [122]

    Rees , D. E. & Semel , M. D. 1979, , 74, 1

    1979

  115. [123]

    2012, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 9, 1

    Reiners , A. 2012, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 9, 1

    2012

  116. [124]

    F., G \"u del , M., & Audard , M

    Ribas , I., Guinan , E. F., G \"u del , M., & Audard , M. 2005, , 622, 680

    2005

  117. [125]

    M., Vidotto , A

    Rodgers-Lee , D., Taylor , A. M., Vidotto , A. A., & Downes , T. P. 2021 a , , 504, 1519

    2021

  118. [126]

    A., & Mesquita , A

    Rodgers-Lee , D., Vidotto , A. A., & Mesquita , A. L. 2021 b , , 508, 4696

    2021

  119. [127]

    2016, , 593, A35

    Ros \'e n , L., Kochukhov , O., Hackman , T., & Lehtinen , J. 2016, , 593, A35

    2016

  120. [128]

    Ros \'e n , L., Kochukhov , O., & Wade , G. A. 2015, ApJ, 805, 169

    2015

  121. [129]

    2015, ApJ, 809, 57

    Rugheimer , S., Kaltenegger , L., Segura , A., Linsky , J., & Mohanty , S. 2015, ApJ, 809, 57

    2015

  122. [130]

    Rutten , R. G. M. 1984, , 130, 353

    1984

  123. [131]

    L., et al

    Ryabchikova , T., Piskunov , N., Kurucz , R. L., et al. 2015, Phys. Scr., 90, 054005

    2015

  124. [132]

    C., Santerne , A., Faria , J

    Santos , N. C., Santerne , A., Faria , J. P., et al. 2016, , 592, A13

    2016

  125. [133]

    2011, , 532, A6

    Sanz-Forcada , J., Micela , G., Ribas , I., et al. 2011, , 532, A6

    2011

  126. [134]

    A., Henry , G

    Sato , B., Fischer , D. A., Henry , G. W., et al. 2005, , 633, 465

    2005

  127. [135]

    A., et al

    See , V., Jardine , M., Vidotto , A. A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 4301

    2015

  128. [136]

    A., et al

    See , V., Jardine , M., Vidotto , A. A., et al. 2014, A&A, 570, A99

    2014

  129. [137]

    1989, A&A, 225, 456

    Semel , M. 1989, A&A, 225, 456

    1989

  130. [138]

    & Bryan , R

    Skilling , J. & Bryan , R. K. 1984, MNRAS, 211, 111

    1984

  131. [139]

    Tsai , S.-M., Lee , E. K. H., Powell , D., et al. 2023, , 617, 483

    2023

  132. [140]

    P., G \"u del , M., & Lammer , H

    Tu , L., Johnstone , C. P., G \"u del , M., & Lammer , H. 2015, , 577, L3

    2015

  133. [141]

    Valenti , J. A. & Fischer , D. A. 2005, , 159, 141

    2005

  134. [142]

    van Belle , G. T. & von Braun , K. 2009, , 694, 1085

    2009

  135. [143]

    C., & Varoquaux , G

    van der Walt , S., Colbert , S. C., & Varoquaux , G. 2011, Computing in Science and Engineering, 13, 22

    2011

  136. [144]

    2025, , 694, A310

    Van Looveren , G., Boro Saikia , S., Herbort , O., et al. 2025, , 694, A310

    2025

  137. [145]

    2024, , 683, A153

    Van Looveren , G., G \"u del , M., Boro Saikia , S., & Kislyakova , K. 2024, , 683, A153

    2024

  138. [146]

    H., Preston , G

    Vaughan , A. H., Preston , G. W., & Wilson , O. C. 1978, PASP, 90, 267

    1978

  139. [147]

    A., Bourrier , V., Fares , R., et al

    Vidotto , A. A., Bourrier , V., Fares , R., et al. 2023, , 678, A152

    2023

  140. [148]

    A., Gregory , S

    Vidotto , A. A., Gregory , S. G., Jardine , M., et al. 2014 a , , 441, 2361

    2014

  141. [149]

    A., Jardine , M., Morin , J., et al

    Vidotto , A. A., Jardine , M., Morin , J., et al. 2013, A&A, 557, A67

    2013

  142. [150]

    A., Jardine , M., Morin , J., et al

    Vidotto , A. A., Jardine , M., Morin , J., et al. 2014 b , MNRAS, 438, 1162

    2014

  143. [151]

    A., Lehmann , L

    Vidotto , A. A., Lehmann , L. T., Jardine , M., & Pevtsov , A. A. 2018, , 480, 477

    2018

  144. [152]

    2020, scipy/scipy: SciPy 1.5.3

    Virtanen , P., Gommers , R., Burovski , E., et al. 2020, scipy/scipy: SciPy 1.5.3

    2020

  145. [153]

    2000, , 143, 9

    Wenger , M., Ochsenbein , F., Egret , D., et al. 2000, , 143, 9

    2000

  146. [154]

    J., Hackman , T., et al

    Willamo , T., Lehtinen , J. J., Hackman , T., et al. 2022, , 659, A71

    2022

  147. [155]

    Wilson , O. C. 1968, ApJ, 153, 221

    1968

  148. [156]

    Wood , B. E. 2004, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 1, 2

    2004

  149. [157]

    Wood , B. E. 2006, , 126, 3

    2006

  150. [158]

    J., Drake , J

    Wright , N. J., Drake , J. J., Mamajek , E. E., & Henry , G. W. 2011, ApJ, 743, 48

    2011

  151. [159]

    1897, Nature, 55, 347

    Zeeman , P. 1897, Nature, 55, 347

  152. [160]

    2012, , 548, A97

    Zejda , M., Paunzen , E., Baumann , B., Mikul \'a s ek , Z., & Li s ka , J. 2012, , 548, A97

    2012

  153. [161]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sent...

  154. [162]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.