Redefining Elderly Care with Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities

Hazrat Ali; Kashif Ahmad; Ruhul Amin Khalil

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 108 references

Redefining Elderly Care with Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read LLM-powered agentic AI could reshape elderly care, but only with the right safeguards.

desk verdict A useful but overclaimed narrative review; the "first ever" assertion needs support or softening before this should be cited. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.14912 v1 pith:UM7MFVCT submitted 2025-07-20 cs.AI

Ruhul Amin Khalil , Kashif Ahmad , Hazrat Ali This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.AI

keywords AgenticAIelderlycarelargelanguagemodelsautonomousdecision-makingdigitalhealthethicshallucinationmitigation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that LLM-powered agentic AI—systems that set goals, plan, and act autonomously rather than simply answering prompts—could meaningfully improve elderly care by offering companionship, personalized health monitoring, cognitive engagement, and help with daily tasks. It claims to be the first study to survey agentic AI specifically in this setting, distinguishing its autonomous and proactive behavior from the broader AI tools covered in earlier reviews. The paper's central message is that these systems can extend older adults' independence and quality of life, but only if data privacy, accuracy, inclusivity, and human oversight are treated as design requirements rather than afterthoughts. It closes by laying out research priorities, including standardized evaluation, multimodal integration, and adversarial robustness.

What carries the argument

The central object is the LLM-based agentic AI system, defined in contrast to traditional rule-following AI: an autonomous, goal-directed agent that can break complex care tasks into actionable steps, adapt to a user's communication style, and coordinate multiple specialized sub-agents such as Validator, Critic, and Teacher to cross-check its own outputs. The paper's argument is carried by this distinction, which is used to explain both the transformatory applications—proactive health monitoring, adaptive cognitive exercises, and smart-home control—and the distinctive failure modes, including hallucination, prompt injection, jail-breaking, and accountability gaps, that call for new evaluation frameworks.

What would settle it

A systematic, preregistered literature search that uncovers a peer-reviewed review of agentic AI in elderly care published before July 2025 with a wider scope would directly refute the paper's novelty claim; alternatively, a controlled study in which an LLM-based care agent's multi-agent consensus pipeline produces hallucination rates above 5% on realistic elderly-care queries would undermine its key proposed safeguard.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that agentic AI represents a distinct and timely category of care technology whose defining capabilities—autonomous reasoning, proactive decision-making, multi-agent collaboration, and memory of past interactions—map directly onto the unmet needs of an ageing population, including loneliness, cognitive decline, and complex health management. It organizes the emerging evidence into five application areas—companionship and emotional support, personalized health assistance, cognitive engagement, enabling independence, and inclusivity—and pairs each with technical and ethical challenges such as hallucination, privacy breaches, bias, and prompt injection attacks. The authors argue that with multi-agent consensus mechanisms, federated learning, human-in-the-loop validation, and transparent audit trails, these obstacles are manageable, and they propose a human-centered integration framework as the path forward.

Load-bearing premise

The review assumes, without a systematic literature-search protocol, that the cited works are representative and that no prior agentic-AI-in-elderly-care review exists.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If agentic AI delivers on its promise, older adults could live independently for longer, with systems handling medication reminders, fall detection, appointments, and social engagement around the clock.
Caregiver shortages could be partially offset, since autonomous agents can conduct check-in calls, triage risks, and automate scheduling, freeing human staff for higher-level decisions.
Multi-agent consensus with human-in-the-loop validation is proposed to keep hallucination rates below 5%, making safety-critical care advice more trustworthy than single-model outputs.
The ethical safeguards the paper calls for—differential privacy, federated learning, audit trails, and override mechanisms—would need to become standard practice rather than optional extras.
Standardized evaluation frameworks with longitudinal outcome tracking would be needed before these systems can be responsibly deployed at scale.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The review's application taxonomy could be turned into a concrete benchmark suite, with each application area—companionship, monitoring, cognitive engagement, independence, inclusivity—having testable outcome metrics such as loneliness scores or medication adherence.
The claim that multi-agent consensus reduces hallucination below 5% is testable today: measure it in a controlled elderly-care dialogue scenario, and if it fails, the paper's key safety argument weakens.
Regulators may need to treat agentic AI differently from earlier AI because autonomous decision-making shifts liability from the user to the system's operators; the paper's call for audit trails hints at this but does not develop it.
The companion dashboard the authors release could become a living map of the field, and tracking how the literature evolves would itself test the paper's novelty claim.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's my take on 2507.14912. It's a narrative review, not a systematic one, and it does something useful: it lays out the application space for agentic AI in elderly care—companionship, health assistance, cognitive engagement, independent living, and inclusivity—and pairs that with a challenge taxonomy covering privacy, hallucination risk, bias, and prompt-injection. The companion dashboard is a genuinely nice touch and worth acknowledging. If you want a quick map of this area and its open problems, this paper gives you one.

The problems are real but fixable. The headline contribution, "first ever comprehensive review of agentic AI in elderly care," is asserted without a systematic search protocol. That is a strong negative claim, and the paper doesn't show the work that would support it. A targeted search of agentic AI in healthcare or gerontechnology could plausibly turn up prior coverage. If the gap claim is the centerpiece, it needs to be earned. Relatedly, the claim that multi-agent consensus plus human-in-the-loop validation can push hallucination rates below 5% is attributed to a McKinsey economic report and a voice-agent perspective piece, neither of which obviously supplies the statistic. That's the kind of quantitative assertion a review should trace to a primary evaluation, or present as an industry estimate with appropriate hedging. There are also duplicate references and citation inconsistencies scattered through the reference list.

The fabric of the review is plausible. The challenges sections are standard but accurate, and the future directions are sensible. I wouldn't call the scholarship dishonest—it reads like a genuinely intended overview that got ahead of its evidence in a few places. But as it stands, the novelty claim is not established, and the evidence quality is mixed. Those are correctible with a revision that either adds a systematic search (or at least a clearly scoped method) and a pruned reference list, or explicitly reframes the contribution as a viewpoint/position piece rather than a comprehensive review.

I'd send it to peer review rather than desk-reject: the topic is important, the synthesis is usable, and a serious referee can push the authors to fix the load-bearing issues. I would not cite it in its current form, but I'd cite a revised version. Worth a reading-group slot to discuss how reviews should handle novelty claims.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a narrative review/position paper on the use of LLM-based Agentic AI in elderly care. It surveys potential applications (companionship, health assistance, cognitive engagement, independence, inclusivity), discusses challenges (privacy, accuracy, inclusivity, technical integration, security), proposes solution categories, and outlines future research priorities. The paper claims to be the first comprehensive interdisciplinary overview of Agentic AI in elderly care and provides an accompanying interactive dashboard.

Significance. If the paper's claims are well supported, it would fill a genuine gap: existing reviews cover general AI in elderly care but not the specific category of agentic LLM systems. The structured taxonomy of applications and challenges (Figs. 2–3, Tables I–III) is useful for orienting researchers and practitioners, and the companion dashboard is a constructive resource. The paper is also commendable for explicitly addressing safety, bias, and adversarial robustness in a vulnerable-user context. However, as a review, its value depends heavily on the reliability of its source base and the defensibility of its novelty claim; both are currently weak and need reinforcement.

major comments (3)

[Section I-D and I-E] The central novelty claim that this is 'the first ever study that presents comprehensive interdisciplinary overview of the role of Agentic AI in elderly care' is not supported by any reported systematic search. No databases, search strings, screening criteria, or date range are given, and the related-work comparison in Section I-E covers only four prior reviews. Since 'first ever' is a strong negative existential claim, the absence of a documented search strategy leaves the paper's primary stated contribution unverified. I recommend either adding a rigorous search methodology section or revising the claim to something like 'to the best of our knowledge, no prior review has focused specifically on LLM-based Agentic AI in elderly care' with the supporting search evidence.
[Section III-A4 and III-A2] The quantitative claim that 'multi-agent consensus mechanisms coupled with human-in-the-loop validation can reduce hallucination rates below 5%' (Section III-A4) is not supported by the cited references [15] and [37]. Reference [15] is a McKinsey economics report on generative AI's economic potential and does not appear to contain this statistic; reference [37] is a perspective piece on generative AI voice agents. Similarly, the hallucination-rate range of 5%–30% cited in Sections III-A1 and III-A2 is attributed to [56], an industry blog (Bloor Research), with the in-text citation 'According to Andy et al.' that does not match the reference. These numbers are load-bearing for the proposed solutions, so they need to be traced to primary peer-reviewed studies or explicitly flagged as estimates from non-peer-reviewed sources.
[Section I-C and II] The paper does not crisply define the boundary between 'Agentic AI' and general LLM-based conversational AI. Several cited applications (e.g., ChatGPT providing empathetic responses, LLaMA facilitating book clubs) are standard LLM use cases without clear evidence of agentic autonomy, proactivity, or multi-agent collaboration. This weakens the claim that the review is about a distinct technology category and makes it harder for readers to see what specifically distinguishes the surveyed systems from prior LLM-in-healthcare reviews. The authors should either tighten the definition and apply it consistently when classifying applications, or acknowledge that the boundary is fuzzy and explain why the included examples still count as agentic.

minor comments (4)

[General] The manuscript contains several typographical and grammatical errors, including 'worksflows' (Section I-B), 'offerig' (Section I-E), 'F a Graying World' in reference [63], and 'V oice' (Section II-D). A careful proofreading pass is needed.
[References] There are duplicate and inconsistent references: [43] and [83] appear to be the same Ferri-Molla et al. paper with different venue details; [50] duplicates [8] (both Accelirate, 'How Agentic AI is Transforming Healthcare'); [56] and [85] are both Hayler's Bloor Research piece; and [58] appears twice in spirit with different numbering. These should be consolidated.
[Section III-A1] The sentence 'This underscores the need for multi-agent consensus mechanisms and human-in-the-loop validation' appears twice in close proximity (end of III-A1 and again in III-A2). Please remove the redundancy.
[Section II, Fig. 2 caption] The caption says the applications are organized into four broad categories but then lists five items (i)–(v). Either the text or the figure should be corrected for consistency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this is a review paper with no derivation or fitted results, and the self-citations are peripheral rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

This paper is a narrative review of Agentic AI in elderly care. It contains no derivation chain, no fitted parameters, no equations that define outputs in terms of inputs, and no quantitative claim that is constructed from its own premises. The central novelty assertion ('this is the first ever study that presents comprehensive interdisciplinary overview of the role of Agentic AI in elderly care') is a negative existential claim supported only by 'to the best of our knowledge' and a comparison with four prior reviews; while that claim is under-supported, being unsupported is a correctness or methodological weakness, not circularity. The authors do cite their own prior work in a few places (e.g., refs. [23], [58], [80], [81]), but these citations support background statements about speech emotion recognition, LLM risks, and synthetic medical images; none of the paper's conclusions is logically forced by those self-citations. The claim in Section III-A4 that multi-agent consensus mechanisms 'can reduce hallucination rates below 5%' is attributed to sources that may not support it, but again this is a source-quality concern rather than a reduction of a prediction to an input by construction. No step in the paper defines a result in terms of itself, fits a parameter and then relabels it as a prediction, or imports a uniqueness theorem from the authors' own prior work. Therefore the appropriate circularity finding is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a narrative review, so it introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its central claims rest on the reliability of cited literature and the distinctiveness of the agentic AI category.

assumptions (2)

domain assumption Cited sources, including industry blogs, market reports, and vendor websites, provide reliable evidence for the stated capabilities and risks.
The review's conclusions depend on the accuracy of these mixed sources, e.g., hallucination rate estimates from a blog [56] and market forecasts from Grand View Research [7].
domain assumption Agentic AI is a distinct enough category from general AI in elderly care to warrant a separate review.
The paper's claimed gap depends on this distinction; prior reviews [16], [17], [18], [19] are said not to cover it.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Redefining Elderly Care with Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UM7MFVCT

@misc{pith2026250714912,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Redefining Elderly Care with Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UM7MFVCT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.14912}
}

read the original abstract

The global ageing population necessitates new and emerging strategies for caring for older adults. In this article, we explore the potential for transformation in elderly care through Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI), powered by Large Language Models (LLMs). We discuss the proactive and autonomous decision-making facilitated by Agentic AI in elderly care. Personalized tracking of health, cognitive care, and environmental management, all aimed at enhancing independence and high-level living for older adults, represents important areas of application. With a potential for significant transformation of elderly care, Agentic AI also raises profound concerns about data privacy and security, decision independence, and access. We share key insights to emphasize the need for ethical safeguards, privacy protections, and transparent decision-making. Our goal in this article is to provide a balanced discussion of both the potential and the challenges associated with Agentic AI, and to provide insights into its responsible use in elderly care, to bring Agentic AI into harmony with the requirements and vulnerabilities specific to the elderly. Finally, we identify the priorities for the academic research communities, to achieve human-centered advancements and integration of Agentic AI in elderly care. To the best of our knowledge, this is no existing study that reviews the role of Agentic AI in elderly care. Hence, we address the literature gap by analyzing the unique capabilities, applications, and limitations of LLM-based Agentic AI in elderly care. We also provide a companion interactive dashboard at https://hazratali.github.io/agenticai/.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.14912 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Applications of Agentic AI in Elderly Care. The applications are organized into four broad categories in the context [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Challenges associated with Agentic AI in Elderly Care. The challenges can be broadly categorized as; (i) the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

[15]

The Economic Potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier,

M. Chui, E. Hazan, R. Roberts, A. Singla, K. Smaje, A. Sukharevsky, L. Yee, and R. Zemmel, “The Economic Potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier,” https: //www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the- economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier, 2024, [Online; accessed 03 June 2024]

2024
[37]

How generative ai voice agents will transform medicine,

S. J. Adams, J. N. Acosta, and P. Rajpurkar, “How generative ai voice agents will transform medicine,”npj Digital Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2025

work page 2025
[56]

Agents of Change or Agents of Chaos? The Reality of Agentic AI,

A. Hayler, “Agents of Change or Agents of Chaos? The Reality of Agentic AI,” https://bloorresearch.com/2025/04/23/agents-of-change- or-agents-of-chaos-the-reality-of-agentic-ai/, 2025, [Online; accessed 16-May-2025]

work page 2025
[1]

Population aging and decline will happen sooner than we think,

J. R. Guillemot, X. Zhang, and M. E. Warner, “Population aging and decline will happen sooner than we think,”Social Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 190, 2024

2024
[2]

World population prospects 2022,

U. Nation, “World population prospects 2022,” https://www.un.org/ development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/ wpp2022 summary of results.pdf, 2022, [Online; accessed 16-Dec- 2024]

2022
[3]

Adult social care in England: what next?

A. Bancalari and B. Zaranko, “Adult social care in England: what next?” https://ifs.org.uk/publications/adult-social-care-england- what-next, 2024, online, accessed 15-Jan-2025

2024
[4]

Could these old and new ideas be the future of social care for the elderly?

World Economic Forum, “Could these old and new ideas be the future of social care for the elderly?” https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/ 08/elderly-social-care-dementia-villages/, 2023, [Online; accessed 15- May-2025]

2023
[5]

Who calls for urgent transformation of care and support systems for older people,

H. Hasan-WHO, “Who calls for urgent transformation of care and support systems for older people,” https://tinyurl.com/498ytc2x, 2024, [Online; accessed 11-July-2025]

2024

Show all 108 references

[6]

Aging in place together: journeys towards adoption and acceptance of smart home healthcare technology,

E. Soubutts, “Aging in place together: journeys towards adoption and acceptance of smart home healthcare technology,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bristol, 2023

2023
[7]

Elder care assistive robots market size, share report, 2030,

“Elder care assistive robots market size, share report, 2030,” https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/elder- care-assistive-robots-market-report, 2024, accessed: 2025-06-14. [Online]. Available: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry- analysis/elder-care-assis...

2024
[8]

How agentic ai is transforming healthcare: Benefits & use cases,

“How agentic ai is transforming healthcare: Benefits & use cases,” https://www.accelirate.com/agentic-ai-in-healthcare/, 2025, accessed: 2025-06-14. [Online]. Available: https://www.accelirate.com/agentic- ai-in-healthcare/

2025
[9]

WHO Calls for Urgent Transfor- mation of Care and Support Systems for Older People,

W. Health Organization, “WHO Calls for Urgent Transfor- mation of Care and Support Systems for Older People,” https://www.who.int/news/item/01-10-2024-who-calls-for-urgent- transformation-of-care-and-support-systems-for-older-people, 2024, [Online; accessed 15-May-2025]

2024
[10]

Demystifying agentic ai: How ai agents can change healthcare efficiency now,

R. Retiwalla, “Demystifying agentic ai: How ai agents can change healthcare efficiency now,” https://www.productiveedge.com/blog/ demystifying-agentic-ai-how-ai-agents-can-change-healthcare- efficiency-now, 2024, [Online; accessed 16-Dec-2024]

2024
[11]

How Agentic AI Systems can Solve the Three Most Pressing Problems in Healthcare Today,

T. Kass-Hout and D. Sheeran, “How Agentic AI Systems can Solve the Three Most Pressing Problems in Healthcare Today,” https: //www.gehealthcare.co.uk/insights/article/how-agentic-ai-systems- can-solve-the-three-most-pressing-problems-in-healthcare-today, 2024, [Online; accesse...

2024
[12]

Agentic AI: The Next Big Breakthrough That’s Transforming Business And Technology,

B. Marr, “Agentic AI: The Next Big Breakthrough That’s Transforming Business And Technology,” https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/ 2024/09/06/agentic-ai-the-next-big-breakthrough-thats-transforming- business-and-technology/, 2024, [Online; accessed 28-Dec-2024]

2024
[13]

Inside Agentic AI: Re- shaping Decisions and Orchestration in Life Sciences,

T. A. Nasir and T. Haslam, “Inside Agentic AI: Re- shaping Decisions and Orchestration in Life Sciences,” https://www.iqvia.com/blogs/2025/02/inside-agentic-ai-reshaping- decisions-and-orchestration-in-life-sciences, 2025, [Online; accessed 16-May-2025]

2025
[14]

The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications,

A. Bohr and K. Memarzadeh, “The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications,” inArtificial Intelligence in healthcare. Elsevier, 2020, pp. 25–60

2020
[17]

Artificial intelligence for older people receiving long-term care: a systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness studies,

K. Loveys, M. Prina, C. Axford, `O. R. Dom `enec, W. Weng, E. Broad- bent, S. Pujari, H. Jang, Z. A. Han, and J. A. Thiyagarajan, “Artificial intelligence for older people receiving long-term care: a systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness studies,”The Lancet Heal...

2022
[18]

Exploring older adults’ perspectives and acceptance of ai-driven health technologies: Qualitative study,

A. K. C. Wong, J. H. T. Lee, Y . Zhao, Q. Lu, S. Yang, and V . C. C. Hui, “Exploring older adults’ perspectives and acceptance of ai-driven health technologies: Qualitative study,”JMIR aging, vol. 8, p. e66778, 2025

2025
[19]

Opportunities and challenges of integrating artificial intelligence in china’s elderly care services,

Y . Zhao and J. Li, “Opportunities and challenges of integrating artificial intelligence in china’s elderly care services,”Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 9254, 2024

2024
[20]

Ai helpers for seniors: How large language models are lending a hand in long-term care,

L. N. Blog, “Ai helpers for seniors: How large language models are lending a hand in long-term care,” https://www.ltcnews.com/articles/ai- helpers-seniors-large-language-models-long-term-care, 2024, [Online; accessed 15-Dec-2024]

2024
[21]

Enhancing nursing and elderly care with large language models: An AI-driven framework,

Q. Sun, J. Xie, N. Ye, Q. Gu, and S. Guo, “Enhancing nursing and elderly care with large language models: An AI-driven framework,” in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics, O. Rambow, L. Wanner, M. Apidianaki, H. Al-Khalifa, B. D. Eugeni...

2025
[22]

P. M. Abadir, A. Battle, J. D. Walston, and R. Chellappa, “Enhancing care for older adults and dementia patients with large language models: Proceedings of the national institute on aging—artificial intelligence & technology collaboratory for aging research symposium,”The Jour...

2024
[23]

Speech Emotion Recognition using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review,

R. A. Khalil, E. Jones, M. I. Babar, T. Jan, M. H. Zafar, and T. Alhus- sain, “Speech Emotion Recognition using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review,”IEEE access, vol. 7, pp. 117 327–117 345, 2019

2019
[24]

Supporting the digital autonomy of elders through llm assistance,

J. Roberts, L. Roberts, and A. Reed, “Supporting the digital autonomy of elders through llm assistance,” inProceedings of the AAAI Sympo- sium Series, vol. 4, no. 1, 2024, pp. 182–186

2024
[25]

Integrating Sensor Data with Large Language Models for Enhanced Elderly Care: A Methodological Framework

Z. Momand, P. Mongkolnam, J. H. Chan, and N. Charoenkitkarn, “Integrating Sensor Data with Large Language Models for Enhanced Elderly Care: A Methodological Framework.”Sensors & Materials, vol. 37, 2025

2025
[26]

A reliable and accessible 15 caregiving language model (calm) to support tools for caregivers: Development and evaluation study,

B. Parmanto, B. Aryoyudanta, T. W. Soekinto, I. M. A. Setiawan, Y . Wang, H. Hu, A. Saptono, and Y . K. Choi, “A reliable and accessible 15 caregiving language model (calm) to support tools for caregivers: Development and evaluation study,”JMIR Formative Research, vol. 8, p. e...

2024
[27]

Shaping the future of older adult care: Chatgpt, advanced ai, and the transformation of clinical practice,

K. Fear, C. Gleberet al., “Shaping the future of older adult care: Chatgpt, advanced ai, and the transformation of clinical practice,”JMIR aging, vol. 6, no. 1, p. e51776, 2023

2023
[28]

“Doctor ChatGPT, Can You Help Me?

J. Armbruster, F. Bussmann, C. Rothhaas, N. Titze, P. A. Gr ¨utzner, and H. Freischmidt, ““Doctor ChatGPT, Can You Help Me?” The Pa- tient’s Perspective: Cross-Sectional Study,”Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 26, p. e58831, 2024

2024
[29]

ElderQA- GPT: A Large Language Model for Online Q&A on Geriatric Diseases Based on BGE Semantic Vector Knowledge Base and Langchain Architecture,

Y . Duan, S. Lin, X. Liu, Z. Huang, H. Su, and Y . Bai, “ElderQA- GPT: A Large Language Model for Online Q&A on Geriatric Diseases Based on BGE Semantic Vector Knowledge Base and Langchain Architecture,” in5th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Medicine Sci...

2024
[30]

Llms may enhance geriatric polypharmacy management in primary care,

TechTarget, “Llms may enhance geriatric polypharmacy management in primary care,” https://www.techtarget.com/healthtechanalytics/ news/366589996/LLMs-may-enhance-geriatric-polypharmacy- management-in-primary-care, 2024, [Online; accessed 21-Jan-2025]

2024
[31]

Managing Hospitalization Risk & Better Home Care Delivery Using LLMs,

DIGITAL, “Managing Hospitalization Risk & Better Home Care Delivery Using LLMs,” https://www.digitalsupercluster.ca/projects/ managing-hospitalization-risk-better-home-care-delivery-using-llms/, 2024, [Online; accessed 19-Jan-2025]

2024
[32]

Introduction to Large Language Models (LLMs) for dementia care and research,

M. S. Treder, S. Lee, and K. A. Tsvetanov, “Introduction to Large Language Models (LLMs) for dementia care and research,”Frontiers in Dementia, vol. 3, p. 1385303, 2024

2024
[33]

Embracing Generative AI and Large Language Models in Senior Care,

Scott Code, “Embracing Generative AI and Large Language Models in Senior Care,” https://healthtechmagazine.net/article/2024/04/ embracing-generative-ai-and-large-language-models-senior-care, 2024, [Online; accessed 21-Jan-2025]

2024
[34]

How ai enhances elderly care: Monitoring and assis- tance technologies,

Newo.AI, “How ai enhances elderly care: Monitoring and assis- tance technologies,” https://newo.ai/insights/how-ai-enhances-elderly- care-monitoring-and-assistance-technologies/, 2024, [Online; accessed 17-Dec-2024]

2024
[35]

Synapse: interactive guidance by demonstration with trial-and-error support for older adults to use smartphone apps,

X. Jin, X. Hu, X. Wei, and M. Fan, “Synapse: interactive guidance by demonstration with trial-and-error support for older adults to use smartphone apps,”Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–24, 2022

2022
[36]

Expert insights for designing conversational user interfaces as virtual assistants and companions for older adults with cognitive impairments,

K. Koebel, M. Lacayo, M. Murali, I. Tarnanas, and A. C ¸ ¨oltekin, “Expert insights for designing conversational user interfaces as virtual assistants and companions for older adults with cognitive impairments,” inInternational Workshop on Chatbot Research and Design. Springer...

2021
[38]

Conversational agents in health care: scoping review and conceptual analysis,

L. T. C. et al., “Conversational agents in health care: scoping review and conceptual analysis,”J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 22, p. e17158, 2020

2020
[39]

Using a multilingual ai care agent to reduce disparities in colorectal cancer screening: higher fit test adoption among spanish- speaking patients,

M. B. et al., “Using a multilingual ai care agent to reduce disparities in colorectal cancer screening: higher fit test adoption among spanish- speaking patients,”medRxiv, 2025

2025
[40]

Unburden your staff, unblock access to care,

Hyro, “Unburden your staff, unblock access to care,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.hyro.ai

2025
[41]

We make navigating healthcare easy,

Orbita, “We make navigating healthcare easy,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://orbita.ai

2025
[42]

Agentic AI in Home Care: Transforming Caregiving Through Autonomous Intelligence,

A. Edge, “Agentic AI in Home Care: Transforming Caregiving Through Autonomous Intelligence,” https://automationedge.com/home-health- care-automation/blogs/agentic-ai-in-home-care/, 2025, [Online; ac- cessed 16-May-2025]

2025
[43]

Multi-agent ai system for adaptive cognitive training in elderly care,

I. Ferri-Molla, J. Linares-Pellicer, C. Aliaga-Torro, and J. Izquierdo- Domenech, “Multi-agent ai system for adaptive cognitive training in elderly care,” inProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART), 2025. [Online]. Availab...

2025
[44]

Agentic large language models for healthcare: current progress and future opportunities,

H. Yuan, “Agentic large language models for healthcare: current progress and future opportunities,”Medicine Advances, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 37–41, 2025

2025
[45]

7 key ways agentic ai is shaping patient care,

Anonymous, “7 key ways agentic ai is shaping patient care,”Plivo,
[46]

Revolution in elderly care: How ai and automation are changing lives,

——, “Revolution in elderly care: How ai and automation are changing lives,”Beam AI, 2025. [Online]. Avail- able: https://beam.ai/agentic-insights/revolution-in-elderly-care-how- ai-and-automation-are-changing-lives

2025
[47]

The impact of agentic ai on data privacy,

——, “The impact of agentic ai on data privacy,”StatusNeo, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://statusneo.com/the-impact-of-agentic-ai- on-data-privacy/

2025
[48]

Medical large language models are susceptible to targeted misinformation attacks,

T. Han, S. Nebelung, F. Khader, T. Wang, G. M ¨uller-Franzes, C. Kuhl, S. F ¨orsch, J. Kleesiek, C. Haarburger, K. K. Bressemet al., “Medical large language models are susceptible to targeted misinformation attacks,”NPJ digital medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 288, 2024

2024
[49]

Potential of large language models as tools against medical disinformation,

L. Zhu, W. Mou, and P. Luo, “Potential of large language models as tools against medical disinformation,”JAMA Internal Medicine, vol. 184, no. 4, pp. 450–450, 2024

2024
[50]

How Agentic AI is Transforming Healthcare: Benefits & Use Cases,

Accelirate, “How Agentic AI is Transforming Healthcare: Benefits & Use Cases,” https://www.accelirate.com/agentic-ai-in-healthcare/, 2025, [Online; accessed 18-May-2025]

2025
[51]

Revolutionizing healthcare: The impact of ai-powered sensors,

V . Bhamidipaty, D. L. Bhamidipaty, I. Guntoory, K. Bhamidipaty, K. P. Iyengar, B. Botchu, and R. Botchu, “Revolutionizing healthcare: The impact of ai-powered sensors,”Generative Artificial Intelligence for Biomedical and Smart Health Informatics, pp. 355–373, 2025

2025
[52]

Ai in elder care: Navigating ageism in technology,

Anonymous, “Ai in elder care: Navigating ageism in technology,”
[53]

Agentic AI Named Top Tech Trend for 2025,

D. Ramel, “Agentic AI Named Top Tech Trend for 2025,” https://campustechnology.com/Articles/2024/10/23/Agentic-AI- Named-Top-Tech-Trend-for-2025, 2025, [Online; accessed 16-May- 2025]

2025
[54]

Inside Healthcare’s Hottest New AI Category: Agentic AI,

K. Adams, “Inside Healthcare’s Hottest New AI Category: Agentic AI,” https://medcitynews.com/2025/03/healthcare-agentic-ai-hospital/, 2025, [Online; accessed 16-May-2025]

2025
[55]

RSA Conference 2025: How Agentic AI Is Redefining Trust, Identity, and Access at Scale,

D. McDaniel, “RSA Conference 2025: How Agentic AI Is Redefining Trust, Identity, and Access at Scale,” https://blog.gitguardian.com/rsa- conference-2025/, 2025, [Online; accessed 16-May-2025]

2025
[57]

A Framework to Assess Clinical Safety and Hallucination Rates of LLMs for Medical Text Summarisation,

E. Asgari, N. Monta ˜na-Brown, M. Dubois, S. Khalil, J. Balloch, J. A. Yeung, and D. Pimenta, “A Framework to Assess Clinical Safety and Hallucination Rates of LLMs for Medical Text Summarisation,”npj Digital Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2025

2025
[58]

ChatGPT and Large Language Models in Healthcare: Opportunities and Risks,

H. Ali, J. Qadir, T. Alam, M. Househ, and Z. Shah, “ChatGPT and Large Language Models in Healthcare: Opportunities and Risks,” in2023 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, and Internet of Things (AIBThings). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–4

2023
[59]

Misinformation in LLMs—Causes and Prevention Strate- gies,

Promptfoo, “Misinformation in LLMs—Causes and Prevention Strate- gies,” https://www.promptfoo.dev/blog/misinformation/, 2025, [On- line; accessed 16-May-2025]

2025
[60]

Potential Applications and Implications of Large Lan- guage Models in Primary Care,

A. Andrew, “Potential Applications and Implications of Large Lan- guage Models in Primary Care,”Family Medicine and Community Health, vol. 12, no. Suppl 1, p. e002602, 2024

2024
[61]

Combating Misinformation in the Age of LLMs: Opportunities and Challenges,

C. Chen and K. Shu, “Combating Misinformation in the Age of LLMs: Opportunities and Challenges,”AI Magazine, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 354– 368, 2024

2024
[62]

Ageing and digital technology,

B. B. Neves and F. Vetere, “Ageing and digital technology,”Designing and Evaluating Emerging Technologies for Older Adults, pp. 1–14, 2019

2019
[63]

AI Revolution : Redifining Elderly Care F a Graying World,

J. Anglen, “AI Revolution : Redifining Elderly Care F a Graying World,” https://www.rapidinnovation.io/post/ai-for-elderly-care, 2025, [Online; accessed 16-May-2025]

2025
[64]

Usability for older adults: Challenges and changes,

L. Kane, “Usability for older adults: Challenges and changes,” https: //www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-for-senior-citizens/, 2019

2019
[65]

M. A. Stein and J. Lazar,Accessible technology and the developing world. Oxford University Press, 2021

2021
[66]

A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults,

P. Rashidi and A. Mihailidis, “A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults,”IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 579–590, 2012

2012
[67]

Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes,

T. L. Mitzner, J. B. Boron, C. B. Fausset, A. E. Adams, N. Charness, S. J. Czaja, K. Dijkstra, A. D. Fisk, W. A. Rogers, and J. Sharit, “Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes,”Computers in human behavior, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1710–1721, 2010

2010
[68]

Edge-optimized ai systems,

E. Consortium, “Edge-optimized ai systems,” IEEE, Tech. Rep., 2025

2025
[69]

Inside agentic ai in life sciences,

T. Nasir and T. Haslam, “Inside agentic ai in life sciences,” https: //iqvia.com/agentic-ai, 2025

2025
[70]

How ai enhances elderly care monitoring and assistance technologies,

Newo AI, “How ai enhances elderly care monitoring and assistance technologies,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://newo.ai/insights/how- ai-enhances-elderly-care-monitoring-and-assistance-technologies/

2025
[71]

Exploring the Role of LLMs for Supporting Older Adults: Opportunities and Concerns,

S. Kaliappan, A. S. Anand, K. Saha, and R. Karkar, “Exploring the Role of LLMs for Supporting Older Adults: Opportunities and Concerns,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08123, 2024. 16

2024 arXiv
[72]

The Rise of Agentic AI: Implications, Concerns, and the Path Forward,

S. Murugesan, “The Rise of Agentic AI: Implications, Concerns, and the Path Forward,”IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 8–14, 2025

2025
[73]

The Intelligent Future of Care: Exploring Agentic AI for Healthcare Providers,

NuAIg, “The Intelligent Future of Care: Exploring Agentic AI for Healthcare Providers,” https://www.nuaig.ai/ai-in-action/agentic- ai-for-healthcare-providers/, 2025, [Online; accessed 18-May-2025]

2025
[74]

Agentic AI: Transforming Healthcare through Autonomous Technology,

B. Kumarappan, “Agentic AI: Transforming Healthcare through Autonomous Technology,” https://www.mindsprint.com/insights/ articles/agentic-ai-transforming-healthcare-through-autonomous- technology.html, 2025, [Online; accessed 18-May-2025]

2025
[75]

Mobile-optimized language models,

J. Wei and Q. Chen, “Mobile-optimized language models,” inProc. MLSys, 2024

2024
[76]

Smartphone interfaces for elderly,

X. e. a. Jin, “Smartphone interfaces for elderly,”Proc. ACM Ubicomp, 2022

2022
[77]

Adversarial attacks on large language models in medicine,

Y . Yang, Q. Jin, F. Huang, and Z. Lu, “Adversarial attacks on large language models in medicine,”ArXiv, pp. arXiv–2406, 2024

2024
[78]

Large language model sentinel: Advancing adversarial robustness by llm agent,

G. Lin and Q. Zhao, “Large language model sentinel: Advancing adversarial robustness by llm agent,”arXiv e-prints, pp. arXiv–2405, 2024

2024
[79]

Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,

J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851, 2020

2020
[80]

Spot the fake lungs: Generating synthetic medical images using neural diffusion models,

H. Ali, S. Murad, and Z. Shah, “Spot the fake lungs: Generating synthetic medical images using neural diffusion models,” inIrish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science. Springer, 2022, pp. 32–39

2022
[81]

Leveraging gans for data scarcity of covid-19: Beyond the hype,

H. Ali, C. Gr ¨onlund, and Z. Shah, “Leveraging gans for data scarcity of covid-19: Beyond the hype,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 659–667

2023
[82]

Synthetic health data generation,

J. Yoon and L. Drumright, “Synthetic health data generation,”JMIR Med Inform, 2023

2023
[83]

Multi-agent ai system for adaptive cognitive training in elderly care,

I. Ferri-Molla, J. Linares-Pellicer, C. Aliaga-Torro, and J. Izquierdo- Domenech, “Multi-agent ai system for adaptive cognitive training in elderly care,”Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, pp. 941–950, 2025. [On...

2025
[84]

Autonomous ai systems in the face of liability, regulations and costs,

A. D. S. et al., “Autonomous ai systems in the face of liability, regulations and costs,”NPJ Digital Medicine, vol. 6, p. 185, 2023

2023
[85]

Agents of change or agents of chaos? the reality of agentic ai,

A. Hayler, “Agents of change or agents of chaos? the reality of agentic ai,” 2025, bloor Research

2025
[86]

Quantum-safe encryption,

G. e. a. Alagic, “Quantum-safe encryption,” inCrypto 2024, 2024

2024
[87]

Autonomous healthcare ai,

B. Kumarappan, “Autonomous healthcare ai,”Mindsprint Tech Review, 2025

2025
[88]

Generative ai for economic research: Use cases and implications for economists,

A. Korinek, “Generative ai for economic research: Use cases and implications for economists,”Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1281–1317, 2023

2023
[89]

Ai in home care—evaluation of large lan- guage models for future training of informal caregivers: Observational comparative case study,

C. P ´erez-Esteve, M. Guilabert, V . Matarredona, E. Srulovici, S. Tella, R. Strametz, and J. J. Mira, “Ai in home care—evaluation of large lan- guage models for future training of informal caregivers: Observational comparative case study,”Journal of Medical Internet Research,...

2025
[90]

Prompt engineering in healthcare: Best practices, strategies & trends,

E. Laviola, “Prompt engineering in healthcare: Best practices, strategies & trends,”HealthTech Magazine, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://healthtechmagazine.net/article/2025/04/prompt- engineering-in-healthcare-best-practices-strategies-trends-perfcon

2025
[91]

Artificial intelligence in elderly healthcare: A scoping review,

B. Ma, J. Yang, F. K. Y . Wong, A. K. C. Wong, T. Ma, J. Meng, Y . Zhao, Y . Wang, and Q. Lu, “Artificial intelligence in elderly healthcare: A scoping review,”Ageing Research Reviews, vol. 83, p. 101808, 2023

2023
[92]

Clinical safety of llms,

E. e. a. Asgari, “Clinical safety of llms,”npj Digital Medicine, 2025

2025
[93]

Clinician voices on ethics of llm integration in healthcare,

Various, “Clinician voices on ethics of llm integration in healthcare,”npj Digital Medicine, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39001657/

2024
[94]

Synapse: Interactive guidance by demonstration with trial-and-error support for older adults to use smartphone apps,

X. Jin, X. Hu, X. Wei, and M. Fan, “Synapse: Interactive guidance by demonstration with trial-and-error support for older adults to use smartphone apps,”Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–24, 2022

2022
[95]

Multimodal elderly care systems (mecs),

M. E. C. S. M. P. Team, “Multimodal elderly care systems (mecs),” Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.mn.uio.no/ifi/english/research/projects/mecs/

2016
[96]

Integrating ai with wearable sensors for optimal elderly care,

Various, “Integrating ai with wearable sensors for optimal elderly care,”Journal of Prevention, Treatment & Community Psychology,
[97]

Ai-driven multimodal sensing for proactive elderly care,

Y . Zhang, W. Liu, and J. Tang, “Ai-driven multimodal sensing for proactive elderly care,”IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health In- formatics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1456–1467, 2024

2024
[98]

What Are Agentic LLMs? A Comprehensive Technical Guide,

N. Barla, “What Are Agentic LLMs? A Comprehensive Technical Guide,”Adaline Labs, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://labs.adaline.ai/ p/what-are-agentic-llms-a-comprehensive

2025
[99]

Available: https://www.jptcp.com/index.php/jptcp/ article/view/6450

[Online]. Available: https://www.jptcp.com/index.php/jptcp/ article/view/6450
[100]

Clinician voices on ethics of llm integration in healthcare,

Various, “Clinician voices on ethics of llm integration in healthcare,” PMC, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/ PMC11382443/

2024
[101]

The unintended consequences: Ai and ageism in aged care,

——, “The unintended consequences: Ai and ageism in aged care,”FHG, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://fhg.com.au/artificial- intelligence-aged-care/

2024
[102]

Ai robots in elderly care: Opportunities, challenges, and ethical concerns,

J. He, “Ai robots in elderly care: Opportunities, challenges, and ethical concerns,”Journal of Technology and Social Science, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4fd0925v

2024
[103]

The ethical pitfall: Biased algorithms in aged care,

Various, “The ethical pitfall: Biased algorithms in aged care,”FHG,
[104]

Adversarial attacks on large language models in medicine,

Y . Yang, Q. Jin, F. Huang, and Z. Lu, “Adversarial attacks on large language models in medicine,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12259, 2024

2024 arXiv
[105]

Enhancing care for older adults and dementia patients with large language mod- els,

P. M. Abadir, A. Battle, J. D. Walston, and R. Chellappa, “Enhancing care for older adults and dementia patients with large language mod- els,”The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 79, no. 9, 2024

2024
[107]

Available: https://fhg.com.au/artificial-intelligence- aged-care/

[Online]. Available: https://fhg.com.au/artificial-intelligence- aged-care/
[109]

Large language model sentinel: Advancing adversarial robustness by llm agent,

G. Lin and Q. Zhao, “Large language model sentinel: Advancing adversarial robustness by llm agent,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20770, 2025

2025 arXiv
[2024]

Available: https://online.aging.uf

[Online]. Available: https://online.aging.uf
[2025]

Available: https://www.plivo.com/blog/agentic-ai-in- healthcare/

[Online]. Available: https://www.plivo.com/blog/agentic-ai-in- healthcare/

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [15]

The Economic Potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier,

M. Chui, E. Hazan, R. Roberts, A. Singla, K. Smaje, A. Sukharevsky, L. Yee, and R. Zemmel, “The Economic Potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier,” https: //www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the- economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier, 2024, [Online; accessed 03 June 2024]

2024

[2] [37]

How generative ai voice agents will transform medicine,

S. J. Adams, J. N. Acosta, and P. Rajpurkar, “How generative ai voice agents will transform medicine,”npj Digital Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2025

work page 2025

[3] [56]

Agents of Change or Agents of Chaos? The Reality of Agentic AI,

A. Hayler, “Agents of Change or Agents of Chaos? The Reality of Agentic AI,” https://bloorresearch.com/2025/04/23/agents-of-change- or-agents-of-chaos-the-reality-of-agentic-ai/, 2025, [Online; accessed 16-May-2025]

work page 2025

[4] [1]

Population aging and decline will happen sooner than we think,

J. R. Guillemot, X. Zhang, and M. E. Warner, “Population aging and decline will happen sooner than we think,”Social Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 190, 2024

2024

[5] [2]

World population prospects 2022,

U. Nation, “World population prospects 2022,” https://www.un.org/ development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/ wpp2022 summary of results.pdf, 2022, [Online; accessed 16-Dec- 2024]

2022

[6] [3]

Adult social care in England: what next?

A. Bancalari and B. Zaranko, “Adult social care in England: what next?” https://ifs.org.uk/publications/adult-social-care-england- what-next, 2024, online, accessed 15-Jan-2025

2024

[7] [4]

Could these old and new ideas be the future of social care for the elderly?

World Economic Forum, “Could these old and new ideas be the future of social care for the elderly?” https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/ 08/elderly-social-care-dementia-villages/, 2023, [Online; accessed 15- May-2025]

2023

[8] [5]

Who calls for urgent transformation of care and support systems for older people,

H. Hasan-WHO, “Who calls for urgent transformation of care and support systems for older people,” https://tinyurl.com/498ytc2x, 2024, [Online; accessed 11-July-2025]

2024