Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Comparison theorems in Hermitian geometry I

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes a Myers-type theorem for complete balanced Hermitian manifolds: a lower bound on the holomorphic Strominger-Bismut Ricci curvature forces compactness, diameter $\pi/\sqrt{K}$, finite fundamental group, and…

desk verdict A plausible and useful extension of Riemannian comparison theorems to balanced Hermitian manifolds via the Bismut connection, but the main bridge (Proposition 2.6) is underproved and a sign error in the volume comparison needs fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15002 v1 pith:NBYXHXMA submitted 2025-07-20 math.DG

classification math.DG MSC 53C2153C55
keywords HermitiangeometryStrominger-BismutconnectionMyerstheorembalancedmanifoldcomparisonvolumeholomorphicsectionalcurvatureBismut-Ricci
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to extend the classical comparison package---Myers' diameter theorem, Laplacian comparison, and Bishop-Gromov volume comparison---from Kähler manifolds to arbitrary Hermitian manifolds by replacing the Levi-Civita connection with the Strominger-Bismut connection. The main result states that on a complete balanced Hermitian manifold, a lower bound of the form $\mathfrak{Ric}^{SB}(V,V) \ge (2n-1)K|V|^2$ on the holomorphic Bismut-Ricci curvature forces compactness, diameter at most $\pi/\sqrt{K}$, finite fundamental group, and volume at most that of the round $2n$-sphere of radius $1/\sqrt{K}$. If correct, this gives full Myers-type control over a large class of non-Kähler manifolds, where previously such conclusions were known only in the Kähler or nearly-Kähler setting. The paper also proves a Hermitian analogue of the positive-holomorphic-sectional-curvature theorem: $HSC^{SB} \ge K > 0$ implies compactness, the same diameter bound, and simple connectivity, together with a fixed-point theorem for isometries when $HSC^{SB} > 0$. Because geodesics of the Levi-Civita and Bismut connections coincide, the classical proof strategy can be rerun with Bismut curvature and torsion terms.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Strominger-Bismut connection $\nabla^{SB}$, the unique metric-compatible Hermitian connection with totally skew-symmetric torsion, characterized by $g(\nabla^{SB}_X Y, Z) = g(\nabla^{LC}_X Y, Z) + \tfrac{1}{2}(d\omega_g)(JX,JY,JZ)$; its torsion tensor is $T^{SB}(X,Y,Z) = (d\omega_g)(JX,JY,JZ)$. Because $\nabla^{SB}_X X = \nabla^{LC}_X X$, the geodesics of the two connections agree, so the paper rewrites the energy second variation and the index form in terms of $\nabla^{SB}$: for a unit-speed geodesic $\gamma$, $I_\gamma(V,W) = \int (\langle \hat{\nabla}^{SB}_{d/dt} V, \hat{\nabla}^{SB}_{d/dt} W\rangle + T^{SB}(V,\gamma',\hat{\nabla}^{SB}_{d/dt} W) - R^{SB}(V,\gamma',\gamma',W))\,dt + \tfrac{1}{2}T^{SB}(V,W,\gamma')\big|_a^b$. On a balanced Hermitian manifold ($d\omega^{n-1}=0$), Proposition 2.6 identifies the real Bismut-Ricci curvature along a real vector $X$ with $2(h^{i\ell}R^{SB}_{i j k \ell})X^k X^j$, converting the assumed holomorphic lower bound into $\mathrm{Ric}^{SB}(\gamma',\gamma') \ge (2n-1)K$ along every geodesic. This bridge lets the Myers sine-variation argument, the Jacobi-field Laplacian comparison with Strominger-Bismut parallel frames, and the monotone volume-density estimate run without a Kähler assumption.

What would settle it

A direct geometric test is to search for a complete balanced Hermitian manifold satisfying $\mathfrak{Ric}^{SB}(V,V) \ge (2n-1)K|V|^2$ that contains a minimizing geodesic longer than $\pi/\sqrt{K}$, has infinite fundamental group, or has volume larger than the round sphere $S^{2n}(1/\sqrt{K})$; any one of these would refute Theorem 1.3. A narrower coordinate check is to compute both sides of the Proposition 2.6 identity, $\mathrm{Ric}^{SB}(X,X)=2(h^{i\ell}R^{SB}_{i j k \ell})X^k X^j$, on an explicit balanced non-Kähler metric; a single point where the identity fails would break the bridge from the holomorphic Ricci hypothesis to the geodesic bound used in the proof.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that comparison-theoretic consequences of positive curvature survive in non-Kähler Hermitian geometry when the curvature is read through the Strominger-Bismut connection $\nabla^{SB}$. Theorem 1.3 is the main instance: for a complete balanced Hermitian manifold $(M,\omega)$ of complex dimension $n$, if the holomorphic Ricci curvature satisfies $\mathfrak{Ric}^{SB}(V,V) \ge (2n-1)K|V|^2$ for every $V \in T^{1,0}M$ and some $K > 0$, then $M$ is compact, $\mathrm{diam}(M,\omega) \le \pi/\sqrt{K}$, $\pi_1(M)$ is finite, and $\mathrm{Vol}(M,\omega) \le \mathrm{Vol}(S^{2n}(1/\sqrt{K}), g_{\mathrm{can}})$. The proof gives a Laplacian comparison theorem and a local Bishop-Gromov-style volume comparison under the same curvature condition, and the global sphere bound follows by letting the radius reach $\pi/\sqrt{K}$. Remark 4.1 notes that the same conclusions hold if the holomorphic Ricci condition is replaced by the real condition $\mathrm{Ric}^{SB}(X,X) \ge (2n-1)K|X|^2$ for $X \in T_{\mathbb{R}}M$. The paper further proves that $HSC^{SB} \ge K > 0$ on a complete Hermitian manifold forces compactness, $\mathrm{diam} \le \pi/\sqrt{K}$, and simple connectivity, and that a compact Hermitian manifold with positive $HSC^{SB}$ has the property that every isometry of the metric has a fixed point.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that on a balanced Hermitian manifold a lower bound on the holomorphic Bismut-Ricci form is genuinely a lower bound on the real Bismut-Ricci curvature along geodesic directions; if that numerical bridge gives way, the diameter, volume, and fundamental-group conclusions do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A complete balanced Hermitian manifold satisfying $\mathfrak{Ric}^{SB}(V,V) \ge (2n-1)K|V|^2$ is compact with finite fundamental group, so it admits only finite-sheeted covers that keep the same curvature bound.
  • The Laplacian comparison $\Delta r \le (2n-1)\mathrm{sn}'_K(r)/\mathrm{sn}_K(r)$ holds away from the cut locus, hence every metric ball has volume no larger than the corresponding ball in the constant-curvature model.
  • A complete Hermitian manifold with $HSC^{SB} \ge K > 0$ has diameter at most $\pi/\sqrt{K}$ and is simply connected, so no free homotopy class can be represented by a shortest closed geodesic.
  • A compact Hermitian manifold with $HSC^{SB} > 0$ has the isometry fixed-point property, so it cannot carry a free isometric action by any nontrivial group.
  • The real Ricci version, $\mathrm{Ric}^{SB}(X,X) \ge (2n-1)K|X|^2$ for $X \in T_{\mathbb{R}}M$, yields exactly the same compactness, diameter, fundamental-group, and volume conclusions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The balanced hypothesis appears to enter exactly where Proposition 2.6 converts a holomorphic curvature bound into a real one; this suggests testing a complete non-balanced Hermitian metric with $\mathfrak{Ric}^{SB}(V,V) \ge (2n-1)K|V|^2$ and infinite diameter to see whether balance is essential.
  • The index form now contains a first-order torsion term $T^{SB}(V,\gamma',\hat{\nabla}^{SB}_{d/dt}V)$, so the conjugate-point and Morse-index estimates for this index form may differ from the Levi-Civita ones even for the same metric; locating the first conjugate point on a torsion-dominated example would show how the torsion shifts the comparison.
  • The monotone volume density ratio opens an equality case the paper does not discuss: if $\mathrm{Vol}(M,\omega)$ equals the sphere volume, the density ratio is constant along radial directions, which should force a rigidity statement for balanced metrics that the paper leaves implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops second-variation formulas and index forms for the Strominger-Bismut connection on Hermitian manifolds, and then uses them to prove Myers-type diameter and volume comparison theorems. Theorem 1.3 is the main result: on a complete balanced Hermitian manifold, a lower bound of the form ℜ𝔦𝔠^{SB}(V,V) ≥ (2n−1)K|V|² implies compactness, diam(M) ≤ π/√K, finiteness of π₁(M), and Vol(M) ≤ Vol(S^{2n}(1/√K)). The paper also proves a holomorphic-sectional-curvature Myers theorem (Theorem 1.4) and a Weinstein-type fixed-point theorem (Theorem 1.5).

Significance. If Theorem 1.3 is correct, it is a substantial extension of the classical Myers and volume comparison theorems from the Kähler setting to balanced non-Kähler Hermitian manifolds, and it would establish a genuinely useful bridge between holomorphic Bismut-Ricci curvature and Riemannian geodesic analysis. The paper is honest in relying on explicit prior formulas from [LY17] and [WY25]; there are no fitted parameters or ad hoc assumptions, and the target theorems are deductions from stated curvature hypotheses. The second-variation framework itself is natural and potentially reusable. However, the decisive link between the holomorphic curvature hypothesis and the real Ricci bound is contained in a proof sketch with several unjustified steps, and the volume comparison proof as written contains an inequality with the wrong direction. These issues are load-bearing for the central claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Proposition 2.6 (Eqs. (2.22)–(2.29))] This proposition is the bridge that turns the holomorphic condition (1.10) into the real curvature bound Ric^{SB}(γ′,γ′) ≥ (2n−1)K used in the index-form argument, so it must be proved completely. The present proof is a sketch with several unverified identities. First, equation (2.23) has an index inconsistency: the first term contracts R^SB_{i j k \bar l} with X^k X^{\bar j}, while the second contracts R^SB_{i \bar j k \bar l} with X^k X^j; it is not explained how either contraction is hermitian or how (2.21) follows from this expression. Second, equations (2.24)–(2.27) are asserted without derivation from the Christoffel symbols in (2.17), and the passage from ∂/∂z derivatives to the displayed ∂/∂x derivatives is not justified. Third, the 'Bochner-Kodaira formula' in (2.28) is garbled: the formula [∂*,L]=√−1(∂+[Λ,∂ω]) is not the standard identity, and the subsequent equality ∂*ω = √−1Λ(∂ω) is stated without proof; the step from balancedness to SB T^s_{sk}=0 and then to (2.29) is therefore not established, especially because the sentence 'Here we assume M is compact' leaves the complete noncompact case unresolved. Finally, the assertion that (h^{i\bar l}R^SB_{i \bar j k \bar l}) is a Hermitian matrix is delegated to a 'similar computation' and to [WY25, Corollary 1.8]. Because Theorem 1.3 collapses if this proposition fails, the proof needs to be completed or the proposition should be proved in full.
  2. [§4, Eq. (4.9)] The displayed inequality in (4.9) has the wrong direction for the claimed monotonicity. The Laplacian comparison in (4.6) gives Δg r ≤ (2n−1) sn′_K(r)/sn_K(r), but (4.9) states Δg r ≥ (2n−1) sn′_K(r)/sn_K(r). Consequently the displayed derivative ∂_r log(r^{2n−1}√det g) ≥ ∂_r log(sn_K^{2n−1}) makes the volume-density ratio λ(ρ,ω) increasing in ρ, which is the opposite of the 'decreasing' assertion used immediately afterwards and would lead to Vol(M) ≥ Vol(S^{2n}), contradicting the claimed (1.11). The error is likely a sign flip, but as written the proof of Theorem 1.3(3) does not go through.
  3. [§4, proof of Theorem 1.3(1)] In the index-form contradiction, the sum over the 2n−1 parallel fields is replaced by Ric^{SB}(γ′,γ′) without comment. Since Proposition 2.6 is stated with an explicit factor of 2 and a contracted holomorphic expression, the trace identity ∑_{i=2}^{2n} R^{SB}(e_i,γ′,γ′,e_i) = Ric^{SB}(γ′,γ′) needs to be verified explicitly with the conventions of (1.8) and (2.21). This is a small but necessary step: if the factor or the ordering of arguments is different, the constant (2n−1)K in the final inequality changes. Please spell out the trace computation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1] There are typos: 'mainfold' in Theorems 1.1 and 1.2, 'Sygne' should be 'Synge', and the reference list contains a duplicated entry [FZ19]. These should be corrected.
  2. [§2] The notation for curvature components is confusing: the ordering of holomorphic and anti-holomorphic indices in R^SB_{i j k \bar l} versus R^SB_{i \bar j k \bar l} is not defined explicitly relative to the coordinate expression in (2.3). A short table of conventions would improve readability and would help verify equations such as (2.20) and (2.23).
  3. [§4, Theorem 1.4] In the simple-connectivity part of the proof, the variation α(t,s)=exp_{γ(t)}(sJγ′(t)) needs a little more justification: one must verify explicitly that α(0,s)=α(ℓ,s) for all s and that the boundary term in (1.4) vanishes for this loop variation. The argument is likely correct, but it is only sketched.
  4. [§4, volume comparison] The volume comparison argument uses the cut-locus indicator χ_{Σ(p)} and the normal-coordinate volume element without a precise definition of Σ(p). Since the comparison is an important part of Theorem 1.3(3), this notation should be pinned down, for example by writing the injectivity-radius domain explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the comparison theorems are deductions from the stated curvature hypothesis, and the author's prior formulas are used as independent technical tools, not as the conclusions being derived.

full rationale

The paper is a pure derivation: Theorem 1.3, Theorem 1.4, and Theorem 1.5 are proved from explicit curvature assumptions using index-form and comparison arguments, and no fitted parameters or empirical predictions appear. The only potentially circular-looking point is Proposition 2.6, which bridges the holomorphic Bismut-Ricci bound (1.10) to the real Bismut-Ricci bound along geodesics. Its proof is sketched and cites the author's earlier works, e.g. 'similar computations as in [LY17, Lemma 7.1]' and 'see also [WY25, Corollary 1.8]'. These citations are parameter-free curvature identities for Hermitian Bismut connections; their assumptions do not include Myers' theorem, diameter bounds, or volume comparison, so they are independent support rather than a self-referential premise. The central claim does not reduce to its input: (1.10) is only a curvature lower bound, while the theorem additionally proves compactness, a diameter bound, finite fundamental group, and a sphere-volume upper bound. The apparent inequality reversal in (4.9) is a correctness or sign concern in the written volume-comparison argument, not a circularity. Therefore no circular step is exhibited, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Everything in the proofs beyond the stated hypotheses is classical Riemannian comparison theory or the author's own prior curvature formulas. The balanced assumption (dω^{n-1}=0) is the main metric restriction; Proposition 2.6 is the pivotal bridge and its proof is incomplete as written.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Balanced condition dω^{n-1}=0 is imposed on the Hermitian metric in Theorem 1.3.
    This is a hypothesis of the theorem, not an ad hoc assumption, but it is load-bearing because Proposition 2.6 uses it to identify the real and holomorphic Ricci forms.
  • domain assumption Proposition 2.6: on a balanced Hermitian manifold, Ric^{SB}(X,X)=2(h^{iℓ}R_{i j k ℓ})X^k X^{\bar j}.
    The proof in §2 is sketchy and relies on the author's prior papers [LY17, WY25]; the displayed Bochner-Kodaira identity is garbled. This lemma is essential to convert curvature assumptions into index-form inequalities.
  • standard math Classical Riemannian comparison facts: Jacobi fields minimize the index form, Hopf-Rinow compactness from finite diameter, Bishop-Gromov volume comparison follows from Laplacian comparison.
    Used in §4 without proof, which is standard in Riemannian geometry.
  • standard math The Strominger-Bismut connection is compatible with the metric and has totally skew torsion; geodesics coincide with Levi-Civita geodesics.
    Lemma 2.1, proved in the paper; standard in Hermitian geometry.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Comparison theorems in Hermitian geometry I." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NBYXHXMA

@misc{pith2026250715002,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Comparison theorems in Hermitian geometry I},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NBYXHXMA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15002}
}
read the original abstract

This paper develops second variational formulas and index forms in the context of Hermitian geometry. Building upon these analytical foundations, we establish results analogous to classical theorems in Riemannian geometry, including Myers' theorem, Laplacian comparison theorems and volume comparison theorems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. First eigenvalue estimates on complete balanced Hermitian manifolds

    math.DG 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    On complete balanced Hermitian manifolds, curvature lower bounds for the Strominger–Bismut connection imply eigenvalue lower bounds of Lichnerowicz–Obata, Li–Yau, and Zhong–Yang type.

  2. K\"ahlerness of compact Hermitian surfaces under semi-definite Strominger-Bismut-Ricci curvatures

    math.DG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Compact Hermitian surfaces with semi-definite Strominger–Bismut-Ricci curvature and vanishing (2,0)-Ricci (or parallel torsion) must be Kähler; a third set of results is conditional on an unproven constant.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    On Chern-Yamabe problem

    Angella, D., Calamai, S., Spott, C. On Chern-Yamabe problem. Math. Res. Lett. 24 (2017), no. 3, 645--677

  2. [2]

    On Gauduchon connections with K\"ahler-like curvatures

    Angella, D., Otal, A., Ugarte, L., Villacampa, R. On Gauduchon connections with K\"ahler-like curvatures. Comm. Anal. Geom. 30 (2022), no. 5, 961--1006

  3. [3]

    Locally conformal Hermitian metrics on complex non-K\"ahler manifolds, Mediterr

    Angella, D., Ugarte, L. Locally conformal Hermitian metrics on complex non-K\"ahler manifolds, Mediterr. J. Math. 13 (2016) 2105--2145

  4. [4]

    Hermitian conformal classes and almost K\"ahler structures on 4-manifolds

    Apostolov, V., Draghici, T. Hermitian conformal classes and almost K\"ahler structures on 4-manifolds. Differential Geom. Appl. 11 (1999), no. 2, 179--195

  5. [5]

    A local index theorem for non-K\"ahler manifolds

    Bismut, J.-M. A local index theorem for non-K\"ahler manifolds. Math. Ann. 284 (1989), no. 4, 681--699

  6. [6]

    Chern-Ricci curvatures, holomorphic sectional curvature and Hermitian metrics

    Chen, H.-J., Chen, L.-L., Nie, X.-L. Chern-Ricci curvatures, holomorphic sectional curvature and Hermitian metrics. Sci. China Math. 64 (2021), no. 4, 763--780

  7. [7]

    Kodaira dimensions of almost complex manifolds

    Chen, H.-J., Zhang, W.-Y. Kodaira dimensions of almost complex manifolds. Amer. J. Math. 145 (2023), no. 2, 477--514

  8. [8]

    Invariant solutions to the Strominger system on complex Lie groups and their quotients

    Fei, T., Yau, S.-T. Invariant solutions to the Strominger system on complex Lie groups and their quotients. Comm. Math. Phys. 338 (2015), no. 3, 1183--1195

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Properties of manifolds with skew-symmetric torsion and special holonomy

    Fino, A., Grantcharov, G. Properties of manifolds with skew-symmetric torsion and special holonomy. Adv. Math. 189 (2004), no. 2, 439--450

  2. [10]

    On generalized Gauduchon metrics

    Fino, A., Ugarte, L. On generalized Gauduchon metrics. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2) 56 (2013), no. 3, 733--753

  3. [11]

    On non-K\"ahler Calabi-Yau threefolds with balanced metrics

    Fu, J.-X. On non-K\"ahler Calabi-Yau threefolds with balanced metrics. Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. Volume II, 705--716, 2010

  4. [12]

    Fu, J.-X., Tseng, L.-S., Yau, S. -T. Local heterotic torsional models. Comm. Math. Phys. 289(2009), no. 3, 1151--1169

  5. [13]

    The theory of superstring with flux on non-K\"ahler manifolds and the complex Monge-Amp\'ere equation

    Fu, J.- X., Yau, S.-T. The theory of superstring with flux on non-K\"ahler manifolds and the complex Monge-Amp\'ere equation. J. Differential Geom. 78 (2008), no. 3, 369--428

  6. [14]

    Scalar curvatures in almost Hermitian geometry and some applications

    Fu, J.-X., Zhou, X.-C. Scalar curvatures in almost Hermitian geometry and some applications. Sci. China Math. 65 (2022), no. 12, 2583--2600

  7. [15]

    Levi-Civita Ricci-flat metrics on compact complex manifolds

    He, J., Liu, K.-F., Yang, X.-K. Levi-Civita Ricci-flat metrics on compact complex manifolds. J. Geom. Anal. 30 (2020), no. 1, 646--666

  8. [16]

    Vanishing theorems and string backgrounds

    Ivanov, S.; Papadopoulos, G. Vanishing theorems and string backgrounds. Classical Quantum Gravity 18 (2001), no. 6, 1089--1110

  9. [17]

    Symplectic Calabi-Yau surfaces

    Li, T.-J. Symplectic Calabi-Yau surfaces. Handbook of geometric analysis, No. 3, 231-356, Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM), 14, Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2010

  10. [18]

    Integrability theorems and conformally constant Chern scalar curvature metrics in almost Hermitian geometry

    Lejmi, M., Upmeier, M. Integrability theorems and conformally constant Chern scalar curvature metrics in almost Hermitian geometry. Comm. Anal. Geom. 28 (2020), no. 7, 1603--1645

  11. [19]

    The existence of supersymmetric string theory with torsion

    Li, J., Yau, S.-T. The existence of supersymmetric string theory with torsion. J. Differential Geom. 70(2005), no. 1, 143--181

  12. [20]

    Geometry of Hermitian manifolds

    Liu, K.-F., Yang, X.-K. Geometry of Hermitian manifolds. Internat. J. Math. 23 (2012) 40pp

  13. [21]

    Ricci curvatures on Hermitian manifolds

    Liu, K.-F., Yang, X.-K. Ricci curvatures on Hermitian manifolds. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 369 (2017), no. 7, 5157--5196

  14. [22]

    Minimal complex surface with Levi-Civita Ricci flat metrics

    Liu, K.-F., Yang, X.-K. Minimal complex surface with Levi-Civita Ricci flat metrics. Acta. Math. Sinica. 34(2018), 1195--1207

  15. [23]

    Comparison and vanishing theorems for K \"ahler manifolds

    Ni, L., Zheng, F.-Y. Comparison and vanishing theorems for K \"ahler manifolds. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 57(6):Paper No. 151, 31, 2018

  16. [24]

    On Hermitian manifolds whose Chern connection is Ambrose-Singer

    Ni, L., Zheng, F.-Y. On Hermitian manifolds whose Chern connection is Ambrose-Singer. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 376 (2023), no. 9, 6681--6707

  17. [25]

    Nuclear Phys

    Otal, A., Ugarte, L., Villacampa, R., Invariant solutions to the Strominger system and the heterotic equations of motion. Nuclear Phys. B 920 (2017), 442--474

  18. [26]

    Riemannian Geometry

    Petersen, P. Riemannian Geometry. 3nd edition. Springer, 2016

  19. [27]

    Superstrings with Torsion, Nuclear Phys

    Strominger, A. Superstrings with Torsion, Nuclear Phys. B 274 (1986), 253--284

  20. [28]

    A general Schwarz lemma for almost-Hermitian manifolds

    Tosatti, V. A general Schwarz lemma for almost-Hermitian manifolds. Comm. Anal. Geom. 15 (2007), no. 5, 1063--1086

  21. [29]

    On K \"ahlerian manifolds with positive holomorphic sectional curvature

    Y\^otar\^o Tsukamoto. On K \"ahlerian manifolds with positive holomorphic sectional curvature. Proc. Japan Acad. , 33:333--335, 1957

  22. [30]

    Curvatures of real connections on Hermitian manifolds

    Wang, J., Yang, X.-K. Curvatures of real connections on Hermitian manifolds. Pacific J. Math. 337 (2025), no. 2, 365--391

  23. [31]

    and Zheng, F.-Y

    Wang, Q.,Yang, B. and Zheng, F.-Y. On Bismut flat manifolds. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 373 (2020), no. 8, 5747--5772

  24. [32]

    On curvature tensors of Hermitian manifolds, Comm

    Yang, B., Zheng, F.-Y. On curvature tensors of Hermitian manifolds, Comm. Anal. Geom. 26 (2018), no. 5, 1195--1222

  25. [33]

    On compact Hermitian manifolds with flat Gauduchon conmnections, Acta Math

    Yang, B., Zheng, F.-Y. On compact Hermitian manifolds with flat Gauduchon conmnections, Acta Math. Sinica (English Series). 34 (2018) 1259--1268

  26. [34]

    Hermitian manifolds with semipositive holomorphic sectional curvature

    Yang, X.-K. Hermitian manifolds with semipositive holomorphic sectional curvature. Math. Res. Lett. 23 (2016), no.3, 939--952

  27. [35]

    Scalar curvature on compact complex manifolds

    Yang, X.-K. Scalar curvature on compact complex manifolds. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 371 (2019), no. 3, 2073--2087

  28. [36]

    Scalar curvature, Kodaira dimension and A -genus

    Yang, X.-K. Scalar curvature, Kodaira dimension and A -genus. Math. Z. 95 (2020), 365--380

  29. [37]

    On Strominger K\" a hler-like manifolds with degenerate torsion

    Yau, S.-T., Zhao, Q.-T., Zheng, F.-Y. On Strominger K\" a hler-like manifolds with degenerate torsion. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 376 (2023), no. 5, 3063--3085

  30. [38]

    Hessian comparison and spectrum lower bound of almost Hermitian manifolds

    Yu, C.-J. Hessian comparison and spectrum lower bound of almost Hermitian manifolds. Chinese Ann. Math. Ser. B 39 (2018), no. 4, 755--772

  31. [39]

    Strominger connection and pluri-closed metrics

    Zhao, Q.-T., Zheng, F.-Y. Strominger connection and pluri-closed metrics. J. Reine Angew. Math. 796 (2023), 245--267

  32. [40]

    Hermitian harmonic maps between almost Hermitian manifolds

    Zhang, X. Hermitian harmonic maps between almost Hermitian manifolds. Recent developments in geometry and analysis, 485--493, Adv. Lect. Math. 2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.