Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Interaction-induced nematic Dirac semimetal from quadratic band touching: A constrained-path quantum Monte Carlo study

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The ground state of the half-filled checkerboard lattice with nearest-neighbor repulsion hosts three interaction-induced phases, including an intermediate bond-nematic Dirac semimetal that survives on rotation-symmetric tori and…

desk verdict Solid small-system benchmarks, but the L=16 torus BNDS claim rests on a constrained method with uncontrolled bias; still worth peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15668 v2 pith:U5VAPT45 submitted 2025-07-21 cond-mat.str-el

Zi Hong Liu , Hongyu Lu , Zi Yang Meng , Lukas Janssen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 71.10.Fd71.30.+h02.70.Ss
keywords checkerboardlatticequadraticbandtouchingconstrained-pathquantumMonteCarlonematicDiracsemimetalanomalousHallinsulatorsite-nematicfermionsignproblemdensity-matrixrenormalizationgroup
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to settle a longstanding disagreement about what happens between the two known ordered phases of spinless fermions on the checkerboard lattice at half filling. Earlier mean-field, exact-diagonalization, and early DMRG studies disagreed on whether an intermediate bond-nematic Dirac semimetal (BNDS) exists or whether the system jumps directly from a quantum anomalous Hall insulator to a site-nematic insulator. The authors run constrained-path quantum Monte Carlo (CP-QMC) simulations on square torus geometries that keep the lattice's fourfold rotational symmetry, using multiple self-consistently optimized trial states, and benchmark against DMRG on small systems. They find the BNDS phase between the two insulators, with a window that broadens as the lattice grows, and finite-size scaling gives a finite bond-nematic order parameter in the thermodynamic limit. If right, the phase diagram has three interaction-induced phases and a numerical recipe for probing sign-problem-dominated models on symmetric lattices.

What carries the argument

The machine that carries the argument is constrained-path quantum Monte Carlo (CP-QMC): a ground-state projector in Slater-determinant space that uses branching random walkers and a trial-wavefunction constraint to escape the fermion sign problem. Its accuracy is controlled by the trial state, so the authors iterate a self-consistency loop in which the mixed estimator of the single-particle Green's function is diagonalized and the resulting eigenvectors define the next trial wavefunction. Because that loop can trap in local minima on a translationally symmetric torus, they initialize many independent runs from site-independent mean-field solutions taken at different interaction strengths and select the converged run with the lowest energy. This multi-trial, lowest-energy procedure is what lets the method find a phase that is absent from the mean-field starting point, and the $S^z$ Hubbard-Stratonovich channel is chosen for its milder sign problem.

What would settle it

A decisive check would be an unbiased simulation (or a symmetry-unrestricted variational answer) on a 16×16 torus at $V=1.46$: if the bond-nematic order parameter extrapolates to zero instead of $\Delta_{\mathrm{bond}}\simeq 0.069$, or if a lower-energy state without broken $C_4$ symmetry is found, the BNDS phase is a constraint or selection artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the central claim is that the half-filled spinless-fermion $t_1$-$t_2$-$V$ model on the checkerboard lattice (with $t_1=1$, $t_2=0.5$) has two first-order quantum phase transitions as the nearest-neighbor repulsion $V$ grows. At weak coupling the ground state is a quantum anomalous Hall insulator with spontaneously generated bond currents and a full gap; at intermediate coupling it is a bond-nematic Dirac semimetal in which the fourfold rotation is broken but time reversal survives and the spectrum has two Dirac cones; at strong coupling it is a site-nematic insulator with unequal sublattice densities and a full gap. The bond-nematic Dirac semimetal is not found in the authors' own site-independent mean-field theory, and on a $4\times 4$ torus CP-QMC reproduces DMRG energies to a relative error below $10^{-3}$ and places both transitions at $V=1.53$ and $V=1.56$. On $L=16$ tori the BNDS window broadens to roughly $1.4\lesssim V\lesssim 1.6$, and at $V=1.46$ the bond-nematic order parameter extrapolates to $\Delta_{\mathrm{bond}}(L\to\infty)=0.0693(5)$, which the authors take as evidence that the gapless Dirac phase persists in the thermodynamic limit.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the CP-QMC constraint bias is negligible at the largest torus size, so that the lowest-energy converged run among several self-consistency runs is the true ground state; the constraint is exact only when the trial wavefunction equals the true ground state, and no unbiased DMRG or sign-problem-free DQMC check exists at $L=16$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The bond-nematic Dirac semimetal is a genuine two-dimensional phase of the checkerboard-lattice model, not an artifact of cylindrical anisotropy, because it appears on square tori that preserve $C_4$ rotational symmetry and its order parameter stays finite under finite-size scaling.
  • The quantum anomalous Hall phase persists into the thermodynamic limit at $V=1.0$, with $\sqrt{J_{\mathrm{QAH}}}=0.015(3)$ after extrapolation.
  • The intermediate BNDS window broadens with system size, from a narrow sliver at $L=4$ to roughly $1.4\le V\le 1.6$ at $L=16$, implying the phase becomes more stable rather than vanishing as the thermodynamic limit is approached.
  • Self-consistent CP-QMC with multiple mean-field initializations can reproduce a state that mean-field theory does not contain, suggesting the approach generalizes to other sign-problem-dominated fermion models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the first-order character of both transitions at larger sizes could be tested directly by accumulating order-parameter histograms at $L=20$ and $L=24$; the authors report only order-parameter jumps.
  • Beyond the paper, the BNDS-SNI boundary may owe its liquid-gas-like character to the shared broken symmetry, so tuning $t_2$ might reveal a critical endpoint, a scenario the paper does not address.
  • Beyond the paper, the same multi-trial CP-QMC protocol could be applied to the CrCl$_2$(pyrazine)$_2$ model mentioned in the discussion, where mean-field predicts similar nematic and QAH states, to test whether those states survive beyond Hartree-Fock.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies spinless fermions on the checkerboard lattice with nearest-neighbor repulsion, using constrained-path quantum Monte Carlo (CP-QMC) on two-dimensional tori up to 2×16^2 sites, with DMRG benchmarks on small tori and cylinders. The authors claim a thermodynamic-limit phase diagram containing a quantum anomalous Hall insulator at weak coupling, a bond-nematic Dirac semimetal (BNDS) at intermediate coupling, and a site-nematic insulator at strong coupling. The main methodological novelty is a multi-trial self-consistent CP-QMC scheme that obtains the BNDS phase even though the trial wavefunctions are restricted to site-independent mean-field states that do not contain BNDS order.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper resolves a debated intermediate-coupling regime in a canonical model of quadratic band touching, and it demonstrates that CP-QMC can access a ground-state phase that is absent from the mean-field trial manifold. The small-system benchmarks are a genuine strength: the CP-QMC and DMRG energies agree to 10^-3 on both a 4×16 cylinder and a 4×4 torus, and the first-order transitions in the order parameters match DMRG. The paper also gives specific extrapolated values and finite-size fits, and it is careful to compare with prior tensor-network results. The significance is qualified by the fact that the thermodynamic-limit BNDS claim rests on CP-QMC at L=16, where the constrained-path bias is uncontrolled and where no independent unbiased method is available.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.C and Sec. IV.D, Fig. 6] The selection of the lowest-energy CP-QMC run among multiple self-consistency trials is not a variational procedure: under the constrained-path approximation the mixed energy estimator is biased, and a lower energy does not by itself establish that the corresponding state is closer to the true ground state. Because all trials are single Slater determinants from site-independent mean-field theory, a class that does not contain the BNDS phase, the energy comparison could systematically favor a trial that is biased toward an incorrect ordered state. This is load-bearing because the L=16 phase diagram is obtained exclusively from this selection rule. Please provide a quantitative check of trial dependence, for example by initializing from explicitly BNDS-ordered Slater determinants or from DMRG-derived trial states on accessible sizes, and by demonstrating that the selected state and its order parameters are insensitive to the trial family, or by showing that the constraint bias is controlled as a function of projection time and backpropagation time.
  2. [Sec. IV.D, Fig. 12] The thermodynamic-limit extrapolation of the BNDS order parameter uses only CP-QMC data, and the L=4 DMRG benchmark does not validate the constraint bias at L=16. The BNDS window also shifts substantially with system size, from 1.53–1.56 at L=4 to 1.4–1.6 at L=16, which is a large change that the text does not explain. The finite-size scaling at V=1.46 reports Δ_bond(∞)=0.0693(5) from a power-law ansatz with a small number of system sizes; this extrapolation should be accompanied by fit-quality measures and by a sensitivity study with respect to the included L values. More importantly, extrapolating order parameters at isolated couplings does not by itself establish the phase boundaries in the thermodynamic limit. Please provide an independent check for at least one intermediate system size, or a clear convergence test of the BNDS order parameter with respect to CP-QMC bias parameters, before the L→∞ persistence of the BNDS phase can be regarded as established.
  3. [Sec. IV.C and Sec. IV.D] The excellent CP-QMC/DMRG agreement on the 4×16 cylinder is obtained in a regime where the self-consistency converges to a unique solution from any initial state because of the open boundary conditions. The torus case is materially different: multiple local minima appear and an energy-selection rule is required (Secs. III.A and III.C). No argument is given that the OBC benchmark controls the PBC multiple-basin situation. Please state this limitation explicitly and address it, for example by benchmarking CP-QMC against DMRG on an L=6 or L=8 PBC cluster where DMRG remains feasible, or by showing that the spread of converged energies between different trial runs decreases with system size.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase "constrained-path quantum Monte Carlo simulations (CP-QMC) simulations" contains a duplicated word; remove one occurrence.
  2. [Sec. III] The sentence "In our integrated appraoch" contains a typo; it should read "approach".
  3. [Eq. (14)] The orientation sign factor ε_{r,δ} in the QAH order parameter is not defined; please specify its convention so that the current-current correlation is unambiguous.
  4. [Fig. 12 caption] The caption is inconsistent: it begins "(a-c) QAH order parameter" but then lists "(b) BNDS order parameter" and "(c) SNI order parameter"; the panel labels and descriptions should be aligned.
  5. [References] Refs. [42,43] and [44,45] are the same two works listed twice; merge the duplicate entries.
  6. [Eq. (16)] The SNI order parameter uses a fixed reference site r0 but sums over r; please clarify that this is a correlation function and explain how this estimator behaves in finite-size scaling for a symmetry-broken ground state.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the BNDS phase emerges from independent CP-QMC torus simulations and is not present in the mean-field ansatz used for initialization.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that the checkerboard-lattice model hosts QAH, bond-nematic Dirac semimetal (BNDS), and site-nematic insulator phases—is obtained from constrained-path quantum Monte Carlo ground-state projections on a torus, not from the mean-field trial states used to initialize the self-consistency. The mean-field starting points (Sec. IV.B) contain a mixed phase with simultaneous time-reversal and C4 breaking, whereas the CP-QMC result (Sec. IV.D, Fig. 12) identifies a BNDS phase with vanishing QAH order, so the claimed phase is not already present in the input ansatz. The small-lattice DMRG comparisons (Sec. IV.C/D, Figs. 9-11) are external cross-checks, and the L=16 torus result is a CP-QMC finite-size extrapolation, not a fit to the predicted order parameters. The only self-referential element is the introduction's citation of prior tensor-network work (Refs. [32,33]) for the BNDS phase on cylinders; that citation is contextual and is independently reproduced by the present CP-QMC calculation. Constraint-bias and lowest-energy-run-selection concerns are methodological limitations, not circular reductions: no equation defines the output in terms of its input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a fixed model (t1=1, t2=0.5, tuning V) and on the constrained-path approximation in CP-QMC, whose bias is controlled by trial quality. No new particles or conserved quantities are introduced. The finite-size scaling amplitude and exponent are fitted to the numerical data, and the thermodynamic-limit values depend on that fit.

free parameters (2)
  • Power-law finite-size scaling amplitude a = Not reported
    Fitted in Fig. 12(d-f) with ansatz O(1/L)=O(1/L=0)+a(1/L)^e; the extrapolated thermodynamic-limit values depend on this fit.
  • Power-law finite-size scaling exponent e = Not reported
    Fitted together with a in Fig. 12(d-f); the extrapolated values such as Delta_bond(1/L=0)=0.0693(5) and J_QAH=0.015(3) depend on the fitted exponent.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Imaginary-time projection e^{-Theta H} converges to the ground state when the trial wavefunction has nonzero overlap.
    Invoked in Sec. III.B and III.C as the basis for both DQMC and CP-QMC.
  • domain assumption The CP-QMC constraint, which terminates paths with non-positive overlap with the trial wavefunction, introduces a bias that is small enough at L=16.
    Stated in Sec. III.C; the approximation is exact only when the trial equals the true ground state, and at L=16 there is no unbiased cross-check.
  • domain assumption The multiple self-consistency runs, initialized from mean-field states at different V, explore the relevant ground-state manifold and the lowest-energy converged run is the true ground state.
    Sec. III.A and IV.D; the selection is made by comparing final energies, but no error bars are given for the energy differences.
  • domain assumption The finite-size scaling ansatz O(1/L)=O(1/L=0)+a(1/L)^e captures the thermodynamic limit for the ordered phases.
    Used in Sec. IV.D with three or four lattice sizes; the validity of this form is assumed and not independently justified.
  • domain assumption DMRG on small 4x4 tori provides an essentially unbiased reference for validating CP-QMC.
    Sec. IV.D; the agreement is at the 10^-3 level, but DMRG itself is a variational method and its own convergence is not discussed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interaction-induced nematic Dirac semimetal from quadratic band touching: A constrained-path quantum Monte Carlo study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U5VAPT45

@misc{pith2026250715668,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interaction-induced nematic Dirac semimetal from quadratic band touching: A constrained-path quantum Monte Carlo study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U5VAPT45}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15668}
}
read the original abstract

Electronic systems with quadratic band touchings, commonly found in two- and three-dimensional materials such as Bernal-stacked bilayer graphene, kagome metals, HgTe, and pyrochlore iridates, have attracted significant interest concerning the role of interactions in shaping their electronic properties. However, even in the simplest model of spinless fermions on a two-dimensional checkerboard lattice, the quantum phase diagram as a function of nearest-neighbor interaction remains under debate. We employ constrained-path quantum Monte Carlo simulations (CP-QMC) simulations to investigate the problem using a two-dimensional torus geometry. We cross-validate our results on small lattices by comparing them with density-matrix renormalization group calculations, finding quantitative agreement. In particular, we implement an improved optimization scheme within the CP-QMC simulations, enabling the identification of a bond-nematic Dirac semimetal phase that was found in tensor-network studies on cylindrical geometries, but remains inaccessible to Hartree-Fock mean-field methods. The CP-QMC approach makes it possible to establish the emergence of this phase in a geometry that preserves lattice rotational symmetry and permits extrapolation to the thermodynamic limit. Our results show that the quantum phase diagram of spinless fermions on the checkerboard lattice with nearest-neighbor repulsion features three interaction-induced phases at half filling: a quantum anomalous Hall insulator at weak coupling, a bond-nematic Dirac semimetal at intermediate coupling, and a site-nematic insulator at strong coupling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.15668 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (b). Unlike Dirac points, which feature linear dispersion, the band touching point displays a quadratic dispersion ∼ q 2 , where q corresponds to the distance from k = (𝜋, 𝜋) in mo￾mentum space, leading to a finite density of states at the Fermi level. This enhanced degeneracy renders the system highly susceptible to interaction-driven instabilities. III. METHODS In our integrated appraoch, we combine large-scale qu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Single-site energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (d). These jumps correspond to the cusp and disconti￾nuity in the energy curve shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Average sign as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Flowchart illustrating the self-consistency convergence pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Evolution of the energy expectation value as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) QAH order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: shows the order parameters from CP-QMC with self-consistency on 4 × 16 and 6 × 16 cylinders. The results reproduce the phase diagram previously found by DMRG [32, 33]. At weak coupling, a finite QAH order pa￾rameter confirms the stability of the QAH phase. Around 𝑉 ∼ …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Single-site energy, (b) QAH order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. (a) Single-site energy as a function of interaction strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. (a-c) QAH order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Bond current-current correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Phases in a Two-Dimensional Generalized interacting SSH Model

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A mean-field study finds that interactions in a 2D generalized SSH model stabilize a quantum anomalous Hall insulator, a bond-nematic Dirac semimetal, and their coexistence, with the nematic phase expanding under asym...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015001 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Boyack, H

    R. Boyack, H. Yerzhakov, and J. Maciejko, Quantum phase transitions in Dirac fermion systems, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 230, 979 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    I. F. Herbut and L. Janssen, Topological Mott Insulator in Three- Dimensional Systems with Quadratic Band Touching, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 106401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Janssen and I

    L. Janssen and I. F. Herbut, Phase diagram of electronic systems with quadratic Fermi nodes in 2<𝑑 <4: 2+𝜖expansion, 4−𝜖 expansion, and functional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B 95, 075101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Savary, E.-G

    L. Savary, E.-G. Moon, and L. Balents, New Type of Quantum Criticality in the Pyrochlore Iridates, Phys. Rev. X4, 041027 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    D. J. Moser and L. Janssen, Quasiuniversality from all-in–all- out Weyl quantum criticality in pyrochlore iridates, Phys. Rev. B109, L081111 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    E.-G. Moon, C. Xu, Y. B. Kim, and L. Balents, Non-Fermi- Liquid and Topological States with Strong Spin-Orbit Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 206401 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Uebelacker and C

    S. Uebelacker and C. Honerkamp, Instabilities of quadratic band crossing points, Phys. Rev. B84, 205122 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    A. G. Grushin, E. V. Castro, A. Cortijo, F. de Juan, M. A. H. Vozmediano, and B. Valenzuela, Charge instabilities and topo- logical phases in the extended Hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice with enlarged unit cell, Phys. Rev. B87, 085136 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Janssen and I

    L. Janssen and I. F. Herbut, Nematic quantum criticality in three- dimensional Fermi system with quadratic band touching, Phys. Rev. B92, 045117 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Pujari, T

    S. Pujari, T. C. Lang, G. Murthy, and R. K. Kaul, Interaction- Induced Dirac Fermions from Quadratic Band Touching in Bi- layer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 086404 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    S. Ray, M. Vojta, and L. Janssen, Quantum critical behavior of two-dimensional Fermi systems with quadratic band touching, Phys. Rev. B98, 245128 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    B. Roy, V. Juri ˇci´c, and I. F. Herbut, Emergent Lorentz sym- metry near fermionic quantum critical points in two and three dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 4 (2016) 18

    2016

  6. [14]

    Ray and L

    S. Ray and L. Janssen, Gross-Neveu-Heisenberg criticality from competing nematic and antiferromagnetic orders in bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B104, 045101 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Grover, D

    T. Grover, D. N. Sheng, and A. Vishwanath, Emergent Space- Time Supersymmetry at the Boundary of a Topological Phase, Science344, 280 (2014)

    2014

  8. [16]

    Zerf, C.-H

    N. Zerf, C.-H. Lin, and J. Maciejko, Superconducting quantum criticality of topological surface states at three loops, Phys. Rev. B94, 205106 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Z.-X. Li, A. Vaezi, C. B. Mendl, and H. Yao, Numerical ob- servation of emergent spacetime supersymmetry at quantum criticality, Sci. Adv.4, eaau1463 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    T. Sato, M. Hohenadler, and F. F. Assaad, Dirac Fermions with Competing Orders: Non-Landau Transition with Emer- gent Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 197203 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    Y.-C. Wang, M. Cheng, W. Witczak-Krempa, and Z. Y. Meng, Fractionalized conductivity and emergent self-duality near topo- logical phase transitions, Nat. Commun.12, 1 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Z. H. Liu, M. Vojta, F. F. Assaad, and L. Janssen, Metallic and Deconfined Quantum Criticality in Dirac Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 087201 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Z. H. Liu, M. Vojta, F. F. Assaad, and L. Janssen, Critical properties of metallic and deconfined quantum phase transitions in Dirac systems, Phys. Rev. B110, 125123 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    D. J. Moser and L. Janssen, Continuous order-to-order quantum phase transitions from fixed-point annihilation, arXiv:2412.06890

  15. [23]

    Biedermann and L

    J. Biedermann and L. Janssen, Twist-tuned quantum criticality in moir´e bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B112, L041109 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Huang, N

    C. Huang, N. Parthenios, M. Ulybyshev, X. Zhang, F. F. Assaad, L. Classen, and Z. Y. Meng, Angle-tuned Gross-Neveu quantum criticality in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Communications 16, 7176 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    L. Ma, R. Chaturvedi, P. X. Nguyen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Relativistic Mott transition in strongly correlated artificial graphene, arXiv:2412.07150

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Pan and Z

    G. Pan and Z. Y. Meng, inEncyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics (Second Edition), edited by T. Chakraborty (Academic Press, Oxford, 2024) pp. 879–893

    2024

  19. [27]

    K. Sun, H. Yao, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Topological Insulators and Nematic Phases from Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in 2D Fermi Systems with a Quadratic Band Crossing, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 046811 (2009)

    2009

  20. [28]

    S. Ray, M. Vojta, and L. Janssen, Soluble fermionic quantum critical point in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B102, 081112 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    Sur, S.-S

    S. Sur, S.-S. Gong, K. Yang, and O. Vafek, Quantum anomalous Hall insulator stabilized by competing interactions, Phys. Rev. B98, 125144 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Wu, Y.-Y

    H.-Q. Wu, Y.-Y. He, C. Fang, Z. Y. Meng, and Z.-Y. Lu, Diag- nosis of Interaction-driven Topological Phase via Exact Diago- nalization, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 066403 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    H. Lu, S. Sur, S.-S. Gong, and D. N. Sheng, Interaction-driven quantum anomalous Hall insulator in a Dirac semimetal, Phys. Rev. B106, 205105 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    T.-S. Zeng, W. Zhu, and D. Sheng, Tuning topological phase and quantum anomalous Hall effect by interaction in quadratic band touching systems, npj Quantum Mater.3, 49 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    H. Lu, K. Sun, Z. Y. Meng, and B.-B. Chen, Ubiquitous ne- matic Dirac semimetal emerging from interacting quadratic band touching systems, Phys. Rev. B109, L081106 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Zhang, J

    S. Zhang, J. Carlson, and J. E. Gubernatis, Constrained path Monte Carlo method for fermion ground states, Phys. Rev. B55, 7464 (1997)

    1997

  27. [35]

    Z.-Y. Xiao, H. Shi, and S. Zhang, Interfacing Branching Ran- dom Walks with Metropolis Sampling: Constraint Release in Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo, J. Chem. Theory Com- put.19, 6782 (2023). 12

    2023

  28. [36]

    Qin, C.-M

    M. Qin, C.-M. Chung, H. Shi, E. Vitali, C. Hubig, U. Schollw ¨ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang (Simons Collabo- ration on the Many-Electron Problem), Absence of Supercon- ductivity in the Pure Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. X10, 031016 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Xiao, Y.-Y

    B. Xiao, Y.-Y. He, A. Georges, and S. Zhang, Temperature Dependence of Spin and Charge Orders in the Doped Two- Dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. X13, 011007 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Xu, C.-M

    H. Xu, C.-M. Chung, M. Qin, U. Schollw ¨ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang, Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model, Science384, eadh7691 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    M. Qin, H. Shi, and S. Zhang, Coupling quantum Monte Carlo and independent-particle calculations: Self-consistent constraint for the sign problem based on the density or the den- sity matrix, Phys. Rev. B94, 235119 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    Qin, Self-consistent optimization of the trial wave func- tion within the constrained path auxiliary field quantum Monte Carlo method using mixed estimators, Phys

    M. Qin, Self-consistent optimization of the trial wave func- tion within the constrained path auxiliary field quantum Monte Carlo method using mixed estimators, Phys. Rev. B107, 235124 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    C. Feng, E. Ibarra-Garc ´ıa-Padilla, K. R. A. Hazzard, R. Scalet- tar, S. Zhang, and E. Vitali, Metal-insulator transition and quan- tum magnetism in the SU(3) Fermi-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043267 (2023)

    2023

  34. [44]

    Blankenbecler, D

    R. Blankenbecler, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Monte Carlo calculations of coupled boson-fermion systems. I, Phys. Rev. D 24, 2278 (1981)

    1981

  35. [45]

    D. J. Scalapino and R. L. Sugar, Monte Carlo calculations of cou- pled boson-fermion systems. II, Phys. Rev. B24, 4295 (1981)

    1981

  36. [46]

    X. Ji, J. Gao, C. Yue, Z. Wang, H. Wu, X. Dai, and H. Weng, Interaction-driven topological phase transition in monolayer CrCl2(pyrazine)2, Phys. Rev. B106, 235103 (2022)

    2022

  37. [47]

    Lu, H.-Q

    H. Lu, H.-Q. Wu, B.-B. Chen, K. Sun, and Z. Y. Meng, Interaction-driven Roton Condensation in𝐶=2/3 Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall State, arXiv:2403.03258

    arXiv

  38. [48]

    Lu, H.-Q

    H. Lu, H.-Q. Wu, B.-B. Chen, K. Sun, and Z. Yang Meng, From fractional quantum anomalous Hall smectics to polar smectic metals: nontrivial interplay between electronic liquid crystal order and topological order in correlated topological flat bands, Reports on Progress in Physi...

    2024

  39. [49]

    Z. Cao, J. Su, J. Li, T. Ying, W. Wang, J.-H. Sun, H.-K. Tang, and H. Lin, Exotic𝑑-wave Cooper Pair Bose Metal in two di- mensions, arXiv:2405.13405

    arXiv

  40. [50]

    Gukelberger, E

    J. Gukelberger, E. Kozik, L. Pollet, N. Prokof’ev, M. Sigrist, B. Svistunov, and M. Troyer,𝑝-Wave Superfluidity by Spin- Nematic Fermi Surface Deformation, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 195301 (2014)

    2014

  41. [51]

    http://www.nhr-verein.de/en/our-partners

  42. [52]

    HPC2021, Information Technology Services, The University of Hong Kong

  43. [53]

    Beijing PARATERA Tech CO.,Ltd

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.