Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Cryogenic light detectors with thermal signal amplification for $0\nu\beta\beta$ search experiments

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A batch of ten voltage-amplified germanium light detectors reached the speed and sensitivity needed to reject double-beta pile-up background in a tonne-scale experiment.

desk verdict Solid measured NTL-LD batch performance; the CUPID projections are optimistic but worth engaging, not dismissing. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15732 v1 pith:IHKXSHJR submitted 2025-07-21 physics.ins-det hep-exnucl-ex

A. Armatol , A.S. Barabash , D. Baudin , V. Berest , M. Beretta , L. Bergé , M. Buchynska , J.M. Calvo-Mozota
show 39 more authors
C. Capelli P. Carniti M. Chapellier I. Dafinei F.A. Danevich T. Dixon A. Drobizhev L. Dumoulin F. Ferri A. Gallas A. Giuliani C. Gotti Ph. Gras A. Ianni L. Imbert H. Khalife V.V. Kobychev S.I. Konovalov P. Loaiza P. de Marcillac S. Marnieros C.A. Marrache-Kikuchi M. Martinez E. Mazzucato C. Nones E. Olivieri A. Ortiz de Solórzano M. Pageot Y. Peinaud V. Pérez G. Pessina D.V. Poda P. Rosier J.A. Scarpaci B. Schmidt V.I. Tretyak V.I. Umatov M.M. Zarytskyy A. Zolotarova
This is my paper
classification physics.ins-dethep-exnucl-ex
keywords neutrinolessdouble-betadecayNeganov-Trofimov-Lukeeffectcryogeniclightdetectorsthermalsignalamplificationpile-uprejectionpulse-shapediscriminationgermaniumbolometerslithiummolybdatescintillators
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a batch of ten germanium light detectors that amplify their own thermal signals by applying a voltage across patterned electrodes, using the Neganov-Trofimov-Luke effect. Operated together at millikelvin temperatures in a pulse-tube cryostat, the detectors achieved a signal-to-noise gain of about a factor 9 at 80 V, baseline noise of order 10 eV, and sub-millisecond rise times. The authors argue this combination of speed and sensitivity is what is needed to reject random coincidences of two-neutrino double-beta decays, a leading background in searches for neutrinoless double-beta decay of molybdenum-100. Extrapolating their measured performance to full electrode coverage, they estimate the residual pile-up background would land close to the design goal of the planned tonne-scale experiment.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the Neganov-Trofimov-Luke effect: electron-hole pairs created by absorbed scintillation light drift in an applied electric field and deposit extra heat before collection, so the thermal pulse seen by the phonon sensor is amplified by roughly $G_{NTL}\approx e V_{NTL}\eta/\epsilon$, where $V_{NTL}$ is the electrode bias, $\epsilon\approx 3$ eV is the pair-creation energy in germanium, and $\eta<1$ accounts for trapping losses. The devices use concentric aluminium ring electrodes covering 56% of the square wafer, with the electrode side facing away from the scintillating crystal in the present geometry. The pile-up projection is carried by an area-weighted gain formula, which assumes the effective gain of a partially covered wafer scales linearly with the covered fraction, and by simulations that apply pulse-shape-discrimination cuts to synthetic pile-up events placed on real noise traces.

What would settle it

Measure the effective gain and baseline noise of a full-coverage wafer with the electrode side facing the scintillator, at the same 80 V bias: the paper's projection requires a gain about $1.7\times$ the $8.66$ measured at 56% coverage and a baseline noise near 10 eV in that geometry; if the noise remains near 23 eV, the SNR at the double-$\beta$ Q-value drops from about 90 to 40 and the pile-up background misses the target.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that NTL-assisted germanium light detectors can be produced as a uniform batch of ten and operated together in a pulse-tube cryostat, with an 80 V electrode bias improving the signal-to-noise ratio by a mean factor around 9 relative to the unbiased devices. In the best calibration geometry the baseline noise RMS reaches about 10 eV, and strong polarization of the germanium thermistors shortens the rise time to roughly 0.5 ms. From these measured values, pile-up simulations inject synthetic two-neutrino double-$\beta$ pulses onto the recorded noise baselines and show that a full-electrode-coverage version of the same detector would suppress random-coincidence background in a tonne-scale molybdenum-100 experiment close to the design goal of $0.5\times10^{-4}$ counts/keV/kg/yr.

Load-bearing premise

The projection rests on two untested assumptions: that the signal gain grows linearly with the fraction of the wafer covered by electrodes (so the gain measured at 56% coverage can be scaled to full coverage), and that the best measured baseline noise can be combined with the best measured light yield.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With full electrode coverage, the projected mean pile-up background index is about $6\times10^{-5}$ counts/keV/kg/yr, with several of the eight detectors approaching the $5\times10^{-5}$ design goal.
  • Because the thermistor readout and room-temperature front-end electronics are unchanged, existing bolometric arrays could adopt the NTL upgrade with added cabling, power supplies, and optical-fiber regeneration only.
  • Eight of nine operational devices held the 80 V bias without leakage current and reached similar gains, supporting reproducible production at the scale of a large array.
  • Operating at 22 mK with strong thermistor polarization shortens rise times to around 0.5 ms while costing only about 30% in signal-to-noise, improving the time separation available for pile-up rejection.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The linear-scaling assumption for partial electrode coverage is the main unmeasured step: if a full-coverage wafer does not reach about 1.7 times the gain seen at 56% coverage, the projected background index is optimistic.
  • Pairing the 10 eV baseline noise from the 'far' calibration with the 0.30 keV/MeV light yield of the 'close' geometry is an optimistic combination; using the 23 eV mean noise of the close geometry would put the SNR at the double-beta Q-value near 40 rather than 90.
  • The large spread in residual background across nominally identical detectors suggests that the shape of vibration noise, not just its RMS, controls pile-up rejection, so mechanical decoupling or noise-cancellation work may buy as much as higher gain.
  • The same electrode-on-wafer recipe should transfer to other scintillating bolometer materials and phonon sensors, so the result is not limited to molybdenum-bearing detectors.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports the fabrication, underground operation, and characterization of ten 45x45x0.3 mm Ge light detectors with Neganov-Trofimov-Luke (NTL) thermal signal amplification, mounted with Li2MoO4 and TeO2 bolometers in the CROSS mechanical structure in a pulse-tube cryostat at the Canfranc underground laboratory. At 22 mK and 80 V electrode bias, the authors measure a mean SNR gain of about 9 for light entering the electrode side, a baseline noise of about 10 eV RMS, and sub-millisecond rise times around 0.5 ms. Using synthetic pile-up pulses injected into the measured noise baselines, they simulate the 2νββ pile-up background index for four CUPID-related configurations and conclude that, assuming full NTL electrode coverage, the devices would suppress pile-up close to CUPID's design goal of 0.5×10^-4 counts/keV/kg/yr.

Significance. The demonstrated batch-level reproducibility of NTL-assisted light detectors in an underground pulse-tube cryostat is a substantial technical step, and the use of measured noise baselines in the pile-up simulations is a genuine strength. If the extrapolations are validated, the paper would provide a concrete route toward rejecting one of the dominant backgrounds in CUPID. The calibration strategy (external X-ray peaks for the absolute energy scale plus scintillation-light coincidences for the NTL gain) and the internal consistency of Tables 2 and 4 give confidence in the measured detector parameters. The main limitations are the unvalidated linear scaling law for the NTL gain and the optimistic combination of noise and light-yield figures, both of which directly affect the central Conclusion.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.3, Eqs. (5.1)-(5.5)] The scaling factor fscale rests on a linear area-weighted model of the NTL gain, G_eff = (1-ξ) + ξ·G_NTL, with a single uniform G_NTL over the covered area. This model is not validated by the data. The authors themselves note in Section 4.4 that NTL is a surface phenomenon whose efficiency depends on field lines and trapping centers, and the measured effective gains, 3.94 for close illumination versus 8.66 for far illumination, show a strong dependence on where the charge is generated. The semi-square and dual-spiral electrode patterns of Fig. 12 are not simple enlargements of the circular 56%-coverage pattern, so the per-area NTL gain cannot be assumed constant. Because fscale multiplies the SNR values used in Table 6 and therefore directly determines the predicted background index, the central projection is not yet established. The authors should provide a sensitivity scan of BI versus fscale or validate the scaling with measurements of the new electrode geometries.
  2. [Section 5.2 and Table 4] The projected SNR of about 90 at Qββ combines the 'close' light yield (0.30 keV/MeV) with the 10 eV baseline noise quoted from this work. Table 4 reports a mean σ_baseline of 23.0 eV for the close calibration and 9.5 eV for the far calibration; the 10 eV value is the far-geometry result, obtained when the scintillation light enters the electrode side and the NTL gain is high. Flipping the LD so that the electrode side faces the crystal is a reasonable design choice, but the specific combination of close light collection with the high-gain, low-noise configuration has not been measured, and the electrode pattern and antireflective coating on the entrance side could modify both the light collection and the pulse shape. The SNR entries in Table 6 should therefore be treated as an optimistic projection, and the associated systematic uncertainty should be quantified or the claim softened.
  3. [Conclusions and Table 6] The Conclusions state that the devices would enable efficient discrimination of pile-ups close to CUPID's background goals, defined as a pile-up contribution below 0.5×10^-4 ckky. The simulated values in Table 6 are all above that goal: mean BI values are 6.7×10^-5, 7.0×10^-5, and 6.1×10^-5 ckky for configurations (II), (III), and (IV), respectively, and the best individual value is 5.3×10^-5 ckky. The claim is therefore quantitatively stronger than the simulation supports. The paper should quote the simulated BIs and the residual gap relative to the goal, or explicitly present the technology as approaching but not yet meeting the CUPID target.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'we obtained a gain of around 9 in the signal-to-noise ratio' should specify that this mean gain of 8.66 is for the far-illumination geometry; the close geometry gives a mean gain of 3.94 (Table 4), and the distinction matters for the CUPID projection.
  2. [Table 4 and Fig. 11] The terms 'Close' and 'Far' should be defined in the caption as referring to the side of the Ge wafer on which the scintillation light is incident, since the difference between the two cases is central to the gain and noise argument.
  3. [Section 5.3, Eq. (5.7)] The formula for the background index would benefit from a derivation or a unit check; the roles of P, A, m, Time, and Δt_r=100% are stated in prose, but the typesetting of the equation is ambiguous about the division by the crystal mass.
  4. [References] Several citations refer to documents marked 'submitted', 'in preparation', or conference proceedings (e.g., [7], [10], [42], [48], [65]); these should be updated to published versions if they become available.
  5. [Throughout] There are minor typographical errors, such as 'at at Physik-Institut' in footnote 5 and some duplicated location text in the author affiliations; a final proofread is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identified: the NTL-LD performance figures are direct measurements with external calibrations, and the CUPID pile-up projections rest on an unvalidated linear area-scaling extrapolation rather than on a self-referential fit.

full rationale

The central measured results (Section 4: sensitivities, baseline RMS, rise times, NTL gain) are obtained from X-ray fluorescence and scintillation-light calibrations with external 232Th sources; they are not derived from the CUPID background goal. The pile-up background simulation (Section 5.3) injects synthetic 2νββ pulses into recorded noise baselines of all eight devices and uses the 2νββ pile-up probability P = 3.41e-4 keV^-1 from ref. [39] as an external input; the background index is then computed, not fitted to the target. The extrapolation to full electrode coverage (Eq. 5.1, f_scale values in Table 5) assumes a linear area-weighted NTL gain; this is a model-dependent extrapolation whose validity is uncertain (the paper itself notes NTL is a surface phenomenon), and Section 5.2 combines the 'close' light yield with a 10 eV baseline noise taken from the 'far' calibration, which is optimistic. These are correctness/robustness caveats, not circularity: no target quantity is defined in terms of the measurement, and the projection is not equivalent to its input by construction. Self-citations to prior CROSS/BINGO work supply methods and comparison points, but the core simulation is performed independently with the present data.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The only hand-set inputs in the CUPID extrapolation are the assumed electrode coverage fractions for the CUPID geometry and the assumed light yield of the CUPID Baseline structure; all other inputs are measured (Table 4) or taken from prior literature (P, A, 2νββ spectrum). The linear area-scaling model (Eq. 5.1) is an ad hoc assumption not validated against wafers of different coverage.

free parameters (2)
  • ξ_CUPID (electrode coverage for CUPID configurations) = 0.75 (config III), 1.0 (config IV)
    Assumed hand-chosen electrode coverage fractions for octagonal CUPID LDs; enters the scaling factor f_scale in Eqs. 5.3-5.5 and directly changes the projected pile-up background index in Table 6.
  • LY_CUPID (light yield of CUPID Baseline structure) = 0.36 keV/MeV
    Assumed average light yield for the CUPID Baseline detector structure, taken from Ref [33]; used in Eq. 5.4 to scale NTL gain for CUPID configurations.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption NTL amplification formula E_NTL = E0(1 + e V_NTL η/ε) with η between 0 and 1
    Used in Section 2.3.1; η depends on trapping and impact ionization and is not directly measured here; the paper relies on Ref [35] for η ~0.3-0.5.
  • ad hoc to paper Effective NTL gain of a partially covered wafer is a linear area-weighted sum of amplified and unamplified response (Eq. 5.1)
    Introduced in Section 5.3 to extrapolate from 56% to 100% electrode coverage; not validated against wafers with different coverage.
  • domain assumption The pulse-shape discrimination rejection power r and the pile-up probability P from Ref [39] apply to the present noise baselines
    Used in Section 5.3; P=3.41e-4 keV^-1 and the 2νββ spectrum model are taken from earlier work.
  • domain assumption Scintillation light yields measured at 0 V hold for the NTL mode and for the flipped electrode geometry
    Calibration of NTL-mode signals in Section 4.4 and projection in Section 5.2 use LY values from 0 V measurements.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cryogenic light detectors with thermal signal amplification for $0\nu\beta\beta$ search experiments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IHKXSHJR

@misc{pith2026250715732,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cryogenic light detectors with thermal signal amplification for $0\nu\beta\beta$ search experiments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IHKXSHJR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15732}
}
abstract

As a step towards the realization of cryogenic-detector experiments to search for neutrinoless double-beta decay (such as CROSS, BINGO, and CUPID), we investigated a batch of 10 Ge light detectors (LDs) assisted by Neganov-Trofimov-Luke (NTL) signal amplification. Each LD was assembled with a large cubic light-emitting crystal (45 mm side) using the recently developed CROSS mechanical structure. The detector array was operated at milli-Kelvin temperatures in a pulse-tube cryostat at the Canfranc underground laboratory in Spain. We achieved good performance with scintillating bolometers from CROSS, made of Li$_{2}$$^{100}$MoO$_4$ crystals and used as reference detectors of the setup, and with all LDs tested (except for a single device that encountered an electronics issue). No leakage current was observed for 8 LDs with an electrode bias up to 100 V. Operating the LDs at an 80 V electrode bias applied in parallel, we obtained a gain of around 9 in the signal-to-noise ratio of these devices, allowing us to achieve a baseline noise RMS of $O$(10 eV). Thanks to the strong current polarization of the temperature sensors, the time response of the devices was reduced to around half a millisecond in rise time. The achieved performance of the LDs was extrapolated via simulations of pile-up rejection capability for several configurations of the CUPID detector structure. Despite the sub-optimal noise conditions of the LDs (particularly at high frequencies), we demonstrated that the NTL technology provides a viable solution for background reduction in CUPID.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Muon veto system for the CROSS double-beta decay search experiment

    physics.ins-det 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A nine-sector muon veto with single-sector trigger logic is projected to reject 99.7% of muon-induced events in the CROSS 0νββ region of interest, reducing that background to ~2e-3 cnts/keV/kg/yr.

  2. The Quest for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay: Progress and Prospects

    nucl-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review of theoretical foundations, experimental strategies, achieved sensitivities, and required advances to detect neutrinoless double beta decay.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Agostini, G

    M. Agostini, G. Benato, J.A. Detwiler, J. Men´ endez and F. Vissani, Toward the discovery of matter creation with neutrinoless double-beta decay , Rev. Mod. Phys. 95 (2023) 025002 – 27 – [2202.01787]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    G´ omez-Cadenas, J

    J.J. G´ omez-Cadenas, J. Mart ´ ın-Albo, J. Men´ endez, M. Mezzetto, F. Monrabal and M. Sorel, The search for neutrinoless double-beta decay , La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 46 (2023) 619

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Bossio and M

    E. Bossio and M. Agostini, Probing beyond the standard model physics with double-beta decays, J. Phys. G 51 (2023) 023001

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Adams et al., CUORE opens the door to tonne-scale cryogenics experiments , Prog

    D.Q. Adams et al., CUORE opens the door to tonne-scale cryogenics experiments , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 122 (2022) 103902

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Alduino et al., The CUORE cryostat: An infrastructure for rare event searches at millikelvin temperatures, Cryogenics 102 (2019) 9

    C. Alduino et al., The CUORE cryostat: An infrastructure for rare event searches at millikelvin temperatures, Cryogenics 102 (2019) 9

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Data-driven background model for the CUORE experiment

    D.Q. Adams et al., Data-driven background model for the CUORE experiment , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 052003 [ 2405.17937]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    CUPID, the CUORE Upgrade with Particle IDentification

    K. Alfonso et al., CUPID, the Cuore Upgrade with Particle Identification , Submitted to EPJC (2025) [ 2503.02894v1]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Pirro et al., Scintillating double beta decay bolometers , Phys

    S. Pirro et al., Scintillating double beta decay bolometers , Phys. Atom. Nucl. 69 (2006) 2109

    work page 2006

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Poda, Scintillation in Low-Temperature Particle Detectors , Physics 3 (2021) 473

    D. Poda, Scintillation in Low-Temperature Particle Detectors , Physics 3 (2021) 473

    2021

  2. [10]

    Alfonso et al., Sensitivity of the CUPID experiment to 0νββ decay of 100Mo, Submitted to EPJC (2025) [ 2504.14369]

    K. Alfonso et al., Sensitivity of the CUPID experiment to 0νββ decay of 100Mo, Submitted to EPJC (2025) [ 2504.14369]

    2025

  3. [11]

    Alenkov et al., First Results from the AMoRE-Pilot neutrinoless double beta decay experiment, Eur

    V. Alenkov et al., First Results from the AMoRE-Pilot neutrinoless double beta decay experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 791

    2019

  4. [12]

    AMoRE collaboration, Background study of the AMoRE-pilot experiment , Astropart. Phys. 162 (2024) 102991 [ 2401.07476]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Agrawal et al., Improved Limit on Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay of 100Mo from AMoRE-I, Phys

    A. Agrawal et al., Improved Limit on Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay of 100Mo from AMoRE-I, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025) 082501

    2025

  6. [14]

    Alenkov et al., Technical Design Report for the AMoRE 0νββ Decay Search Experiment, arXiv:1512.05957 (2015) [ 1512.05957]

    V. Alenkov et al., Technical Design Report for the AMoRE 0νββ Decay Search Experiment, arXiv:1512.05957 (2015) [ 1512.05957]

    2015 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Armengaud et al., The CUPID-Mo experiment for neutrinoless double-beta decay: performance and prospects, Eur

    E. Armengaud et al., The CUPID-Mo experiment for neutrinoless double-beta decay: performance and prospects, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 44

    2020

  8. [16]

    Augier et al., Final results on the 0νββ decay half-life limit of 100Mo from the CUPID-Mo experiment, Eur

    C. Augier et al., Final results on the 0νββ decay half-life limit of 100Mo from the CUPID-Mo experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 1033

    2022

  9. [17]

    Azzolini et al., CUPID-0: the first array of enriched scintillating bolometers for 0νββ decay investigations, Eur

    O. Azzolini et al., CUPID-0: the first array of enriched scintillating bolometers for 0νββ decay investigations, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 428

    2018

  10. [18]

    Azzolini et al., Final Result of CUPID-0 Phase-I in the Search for the 82Se Neutrinoless Double-β Decay, Phys

    O. Azzolini et al., Final Result of CUPID-0 Phase-I in the Search for the 82Se Neutrinoless Double-β Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 032501

    2019

  11. [19]

    Bandac et al., The 0 ν2β-decay CROSS experiment: preliminary results and prospects , JHEP 01 (2020) 018

    I.C. Bandac et al., The 0 ν2β-decay CROSS experiment: preliminary results and prospects , JHEP 01 (2020) 018

    2020

  12. [20]

    Armatol et al., BINGO innovative assembly for background reduction in bolometric 0νββ experiments, Nucl

    A. Armatol et al., BINGO innovative assembly for background reduction in bolometric 0νββ experiments, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1069 (2024) 169936 [ 2402.12262]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Kim et al., Searching for neutrinoless double beta decay with the AMoRE experiments , Il Nuovo Cimento C 46 (2023) 8

    S.C. Kim et al., Searching for neutrinoless double beta decay with the AMoRE experiments , Il Nuovo Cimento C 46 (2023) 8. – 28 –

    2023

  14. [22]

    Bandac et al., Phonon-mediated crystal detectors with metallic film coating capable of rejecting α and β events induced by surface radioactivity , Appl

    I.C. Bandac et al., Phonon-mediated crystal detectors with metallic film coating capable of rejecting α and β events induced by surface radioactivity , Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 (2021) 184105

    2021

  15. [23]

    Berg´ e et al.,Purification of molybdenum, growth and characterization of medium volume ZnMoO4 crystals for the LUMINEU program , JINST 9 (2014) P06004

    L. Berg´ e et al.,Purification of molybdenum, growth and characterization of medium volume ZnMoO4 crystals for the LUMINEU program , JINST 9 (2014) P06004

    2014

  16. [24]

    Armengaud et al., Development of 100Mo-containing scintillating bolometers for a high-sensitivity neutrinoless double-beta decay search , Eur

    E. Armengaud et al., Development of 100Mo-containing scintillating bolometers for a high-sensitivity neutrinoless double-beta decay search , Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 785

    2017

  17. [25]

    Grigorieva et al., Li2MoO4 crystals grown by low thermal gradient Czochralski technique, J

    V.D. Grigorieva et al., Li2MoO4 crystals grown by low thermal gradient Czochralski technique, J. Mat. Sci. Eng. B 7 (2017) 63

    2017

  18. [26]

    Armatol et al., A CUPID Li 2100MoO4 scintillating bolometer tested in the CROSS underground facility, JINST 16 (2021) P02037

    A. Armatol et al., A CUPID Li 2100MoO4 scintillating bolometer tested in the CROSS underground facility, JINST 16 (2021) P02037

    2021

  19. [27]

    Alfonso et al., Twelve-crystal prototype of Li 2MoO4 scintillating bolometers for CUPID and CROSS experiments , JINST 18 (2023) P06018 [ 2304.04611]

    K. Alfonso et al., Twelve-crystal prototype of Li 2MoO4 scintillating bolometers for CUPID and CROSS experiments , JINST 18 (2023) P06018 [ 2304.04611]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Auguste et al., A novel mechanical design of a bolometric array for the CROSS double-beta decay experiment, JINST 19 (2024) P09014 [ 2405.18980]

    D. Auguste et al., A novel mechanical design of a bolometric array for the CROSS double-beta decay experiment, JINST 19 (2024) P09014 [ 2405.18980]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Neganov and V

    B. Neganov and V. Trofimov, USSR patent no 1037771 , Otkrytia i Izobreteniya 146 (1985) 215

    1985

  22. [30]

    Luke, Voltage-assisted calorimetric ionization detector, J

    P.N. Luke, Voltage-assisted calorimetric ionization detector, J. Appl. Phys. 64 (1988) 6858

    1988

  23. [31]

    Armstrong et al., CUPID pre-CDR, (2019) [ 1907.09376]

    W.R. Armstrong et al., CUPID pre-CDR, (2019) [ 1907.09376]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Alfonso et al., Optimization of the first CUPID detector module , Eur

    K. Alfonso et al., Optimization of the first CUPID detector module , Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 810

    2022

  25. [33]

    Alfonso et al., A Gravity-Based Mounting Approach for Large-Scale Cryogenic Calorimeter Arrays, Submitted to EPJC (2025) [ 2503.04481v1]

    K. Alfonso et al., A Gravity-Based Mounting Approach for Large-Scale Cryogenic Calorimeter Arrays, Submitted to EPJC (2025) [ 2503.04481v1]

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Alfonso et al., A first test of CUPID prototypal light detectors with NTD-Ge sensors in a pulse-tube cryostat, JINST 18 (2023) P06033

    K. Alfonso et al., A first test of CUPID prototypal light detectors with NTD-Ge sensors in a pulse-tube cryostat, JINST 18 (2023) P06033

    2023

  27. [35]

    Novati et al., Charge-to-heat transducers exploiting the Neganov-Trofimov-Luke effect for light detection in rare-event searches , Nucl

    V. Novati et al., Charge-to-heat transducers exploiting the Neganov-Trofimov-Luke effect for light detection in rare-event searches , Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 940 (2019) 320

    2019

  28. [36]

    Chernyak et al., Random coincidence of 2ν2β decay events as a background source in bolometric 0ν2β decay experiments, Eur

    D.M. Chernyak et al., Random coincidence of 2ν2β decay events as a background source in bolometric 0ν2β decay experiments, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1989

    2012

  29. [37]

    Chernyak et al., Rejection of randomly coinciding events in ZnMoO 4 scintillating bolometers, Eur

    D.M. Chernyak et al., Rejection of randomly coinciding events in ZnMoO 4 scintillating bolometers, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2913

    2014

  30. [38]

    Chernyak et al., Rejection of randomly coinciding events in Li 2100MoO4 scintillating bolometers using light detectors based on the Neganov-Luke effect , Eur

    D.M. Chernyak et al., Rejection of randomly coinciding events in Li 2100MoO4 scintillating bolometers using light detectors based on the Neganov-Luke effect , Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 3

    2017

  31. [39]

    Ahmine et al., Enhanced light signal for the suppression of pile-up events in Mo-based bolometers for the 0νββ decay search, Eur

    A. Ahmine et al., Enhanced light signal for the suppression of pile-up events in Mo-based bolometers for the 0νββ decay search, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 373 [ 2302.13944]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Haller, Advanced far-infrared detectors, Infrared Phys

    E.E. Haller, Advanced far-infrared detectors, Infrared Phys. Techn. 35 (1994) 127

    1994

  33. [41]

    Olivieri et al., Vibrations on pulse tube based Dry Dilution Refrigerators for low noise measurements, Nucl

    E. Olivieri et al., Vibrations on pulse tube based Dry Dilution Refrigerators for low noise measurements, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 858 (2017) 73

    2017

  34. [42]

    CUPID collaboration, Bolometric investigation of US-produced Li 2MoO4 crystals for CUPID, in preparation, 2025. – 29 –

    2025

  35. [43]

    Avignone III et al., Development of large-volume 130TeO2 bolometers for the CROSS 2β search experiment, JINST 19 (2024) P09013 [ 2406.01444]

    F.T. Avignone III et al., Development of large-volume 130TeO2 bolometers for the CROSS 2β search experiment, JINST 19 (2024) P09013 [ 2406.01444]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Andreotti et al., Production, characterization and selection of the heating elements for the response stabilization of the CUORE bolometers , Nucl

    E. Andreotti et al., Production, characterization and selection of the heating elements for the response stabilization of the CUORE bolometers , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 664 (2012) 161

    2012

  37. [45]

    Antman, D.A

    S.O.W. Antman, D.A. Landis and R.H. Pehl, Measurements of the Fano factor and the energy per hole-electron pair in germanium , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 40 (1966) 272

    1966

  38. [46]

    Koc, The quantum efficiency of the photo-electric effect in germanium for the 0.3–2 µ wavelength region, Czech

    S. Koc, The quantum efficiency of the photo-electric effect in germanium for the 0.3–2 µ wavelength region, Czech. J. Phys. 7 (1957) 91–95

    1957

  39. [47]

    Wilson et al., Improved modeling of detector response effects in phonon-based crystal detectors used for dark matter searches , Phys

    M.J. Wilson et al., Improved modeling of detector response effects in phonon-based crystal detectors used for dark matter searches , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 112018

    2024

  40. [48]

    SURF αCE collaboration, SURFαCE: a cryogenic α detector for the radioactive contamination of material surfaces, in preparation , 2025

    2025

  41. [49]

    E. Olivieri et al., The new CROSS Cryogenic Underground (C2U) facility: an overview , in XXIX International (online) Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics (Neutrino 2020), June 22 – July 02, 2020 , 2020, https://indico.fnal.gov/event/19348/contributions/186315/

    2020

  42. [50]

    Ahmine et al., Test of 116CdWO4 and Li 2MoO4 scintillating bolometers in the CROSS underground facility with upgraded detector suspension , JINST 18 (2023) P12004

    A. Ahmine et al., Test of 116CdWO4 and Li 2MoO4 scintillating bolometers in the CROSS underground facility with upgraded detector suspension , JINST 18 (2023) P12004

    2023

  43. [51]

    The ultra-quiet technology

    “The ultra-quiet technology.” https://cryoconcept.com/product/the-ultra-quiet-technology/

  44. [52]

    Carniti, C

    P. Carniti, C. Gotti and G. Pessina, High-Resolution Digitization System for the CROSS Experiment, J. Low Temp. Phys. 199 (2020) 833

    2020

  45. [53]

    Carniti, C

    P. Carniti, C. Gotti and G. Pessina, High resolution filtering and digitization system for cryogenic bolometric detectors, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1045 (2023) 167658

    2023

  46. [54]

    Mancuso, Development and optimization of scintillating bolometers and innovative light detectors for the search for neutrinoless double beta decay , Ph.D

    M. Mancuso, Development and optimization of scintillating bolometers and innovative light detectors for the search for neutrinoless double beta decay , Ph.D. thesis, Universit´ e Paris-Sud, Orsay, France, February, 2016

    2016

  47. [55]

    Gatti and P

    E. Gatti and P. Manfredi, Processing the signals from solid-state detectors in elementary-particle physics, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 9 (1986) 1

    1986

  48. [56]

    Bandac et al., Li2100deplMoO4 scintillating bolometers for rare-event search experiments , Sensors 23 (2023) 5465

    I. Bandac et al., Li2100deplMoO4 scintillating bolometers for rare-event search experiments , Sensors 23 (2023) 5465

    2023

  49. [57]

    Bekker et al., Aboveground test of an advanced Li 2MoO4 scintillating bolometer to search for neutrinoless double beta decay of 100Mo, Astropart

    T.B. Bekker et al., Aboveground test of an advanced Li 2MoO4 scintillating bolometer to search for neutrinoless double beta decay of 100Mo, Astropart. Phys. 72 (2016) 38

    2016

  50. [58]

    Armatol et al., Characterization of cubic Li 2100MoO4 crystals for the CUPID experiment , Eur

    A. Armatol et al., Characterization of cubic Li 2100MoO4 crystals for the CUPID experiment , Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 104

    2021

  51. [59]

    Spassky et al., Low temperature luminescence and charge carrier trapping in a cryogenic scintillator Li 2MoO4, Journal of Luminescence 166 (2015) 195

    D.A. Spassky et al., Low temperature luminescence and charge carrier trapping in a cryogenic scintillator Li 2MoO4, Journal of Luminescence 166 (2015) 195

    2015

  52. [60]

    Casali et al., Phonon and light read out of a crystal with multiplexed kinetic inductance detectors, Eur

    N. Casali et al., Phonon and light read out of a crystal with multiplexed kinetic inductance detectors, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 724

    2019

  53. [61]

    Mailyan et al., Light collection of some molybdate crystal absorbers for cryogenic calorimeters at millikelvin temperatures , IEEE Trans

    B. Mailyan et al., Light collection of some molybdate crystal absorbers for cryogenic calorimeters at millikelvin temperatures , IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 70 (2023) 1307. – 30 –

    2023

  54. [62]

    Bratrud et al., First demonstration of a TES based cryogenic Li 2MoO4 detector for neutrinoless double beta decay search , Eur

    G. Bratrud et al., First demonstration of a TES based cryogenic Li 2MoO4 detector for neutrinoless double beta decay search , Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025) 118

    2025

  55. [63]

    Piperno, S

    G. Piperno, S. Pirro and M. Vignati, Optimizing the energy threshold of light detectors coupled to luminescent bolometers , JINST 6 (2011) P10005

    2011

  56. [64]

    Armatol et al., “Development of NTL light detectors for the CUPID 0 ν2β experiment

    A. Armatol et al., “Development of NTL light detectors for the CUPID 0 ν2β experiment. In Proceedings of the XXXI International (online) Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics (Neutrino 2024), Milan, Italy, 16–22 June 2024.” https://agenda.infn.it/event/37867/contribu...

    2024

  57. [65]

    Loaiza et al., “Backgrounds of the CUPID experiment

    P. Loaiza et al., “Backgrounds of the CUPID experiment. In Proceedings of the XXXI International (online) Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics (Neutrino 2024), Milan, Italy, 16–22 June 2024.” https://agenda.infn.it/event/37867/contributions/227875/

    2024

  58. [66]

    Armatol et al., Novel technique for the study of pileup events in cryogenic bolometers , Phys

    A. Armatol et al., Novel technique for the study of pileup events in cryogenic bolometers , Phys. Rev. C 104 (2021) 015501. – 31 –

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.