Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Fast Recovery of Niobium-based Superconducting Resonators after Laser Illumination

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Immersing niobium-based superconducting microwave resonators in superfluid helium-4 after laser illumination makes their resonance recover about three orders of magnitude faster than in vacuum.

desk verdict A useful experimental result showing superfluid helium accelerates resonator recovery after laser pulses by about three orders of magnitude, with a mechanism claim that needs a closer look. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16082 v1 pith:XV4PQ5UO submitted 2025-07-21 quant-ph physics.app-ph

Chunzhen Li , Yuntao Xu , Yufeng Wu , Manuel C. C. Pace , Matthew D. LaHaye , Michael Senatore , Hong X. Tang This is my paper
classification quant-phphysics.app-ph
keywords superconductingmicrowaveresonatorsniobiumnitridesuperfluidhelium-4laserilluminationquasiparticledynamicsthermalphononescaperesonancerecovery
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that immersing niobium nitride and niobium microwave resonators in superfluid helium-4 accelerates their resonance recovery after a laser pulse by about three orders of magnitude compared to vacuum. In vacuum, light creates quasiparticles and heat that lingers because phonon escape is throttled by the thermal boundary resistance at the superconductor-substrate interface, so the resonance takes milliseconds to recover or does not recover within the repetition period. In superfluid helium, the fast quasiparticle transient remains, but the slow thermal drift disappears and the NbN resonance fully recovers about one microsecond after the pulse fall edge. The authors argue that superfluid helium acts as an efficient parallel phonon escape path, stabilizing the resonance during illumination and enabling high pulse repetition rates.

What carries the argument

The analysis rests on separating two time constants in the transient resonance response: a fast (nanosecond) channel assigned to quasiparticle generation and pair-breaking-phonon downconversion, and a slow (millisecond) channel assigned to thermal phonon accumulation throttled by the thermal boundary resistance at the superconductor-substrate interface. The intervention is immersion in superfluid helium-4, a phase of liquid helium with zero viscosity and exceptionally high thermal conductivity, which wets the device surfaces and extends the phonon-escape interface. A supporting mechanical detail is the cavity ring-down interference ripple in the high-Q Nb resonator, which shows that the frequency transition at the pulse fall edge is faster than the cavity photon lifetime once the thermal bottleneck is removed.

What would settle it

Measure the superconductor's temperature rise or the thermal phonon flux during and after the laser pulse in vacuum and in superfluid helium with fast local thermometry or phonon sensors. The proposed mechanism predicts a much smaller temperature excursion and a rapid return to base temperature in helium while the fast quasiparticle edge transient is unchanged; observing a comparable temperature rise in helium, or an unchanged slow recovery, would falsify the phonon-escape explanation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that superfluid helium-4 removes the phonon-induced slow-recovery bottleneck in optically illuminated superconductors. By measuring the time-resolved resonant frequency and quality factor of NbN and Nb resonators under 2, 5, and 8 microsecond laser pulses, the authors show that in vacuum the resonance exhibits two distinct responses: a nanosecond-scale frequency shift at pulse edges attributed to quasiparticle generation and pair-breaking phonons, and a millisecond-scale drift during and after the pulse attributed to thermal phonon accumulation limited by thermal boundary resistance. In superfluid helium the slow component disappears entirely, while the fast component is unchanged, and the resonance returns to its no-light state within about 1 microsecond (NbN) or about 10 microseconds (Nb, limited by cavity ring-down) after the fall edge, versus failure to recover within the 1 millisecond repetition period in vacuum. The authors conclude that the extended superconductor-helium interface and the high thermal conductivity of superfluid helium provide a low-impedance path for thermal phonons, thermalizing the device to base temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on attributing the slow vacuum recovery to thermal phonon accumulation limited by the superconductor-substrate thermal boundary resistance, and on assuming that superfluid helium accelerates recovery by adding a parallel phonon escape path through the superconductor-helium interface; this is inferred from the disappearance of the slow frequency drift rather than from direct thermometry or phonon-flux measurements, and it assumes the absorbed optical power is similar in vacuum and helium.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In superfluid helium, the NbN resonator fully recovers about 1 microsecond after the laser pulse fall edge for all tested pulse widths, so optical pulse repetition rates near the quasiparticle-recombination limit become accessible.
  • In vacuum, 5 and 8 microsecond pulses prevent full recovery within 1 millisecond; in helium the same pulses show no residual heating, so the usable duty cycle is set by laser heating rather than by the 1 ms repetition period.
  • The fast quasiparticle transient is unaffected by helium, showing that the speedup comes specifically from removing the thermal-phonon bottleneck, not from reducing quasiparticle generation.
  • For the high-Q Nb resonator, the recovery in helium is about 10 microseconds and is limited by the cavity photon lifetime and ring-down, implying that in low-loss resonators the intrinsic linewidth, not thermalization, becomes the recovery speed limit.
  • The helium cooling power remained unsaturated at 22 dBm laser power at the fiber-chip interface, indicating headroom for higher powers or longer pulses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism generalizes, immersion cooling in superfluid helium could protect superconducting qubits and amplifiers from stray-light or radiation-induced heating, not just resonators, but the direct quasiparticle poisoning component would remain unsolved.
  • A direct test of the phonon-escape interpretation would be to measure the superconductor temperature or emitted phonon flux during the pulse: the model predicts a strongly suppressed temperature excursion and fast return in helium, with no change in the fast edge transient.
  • Comparing normal liquid helium (He-I) with superfluid helium-4 would isolate whether the zero-viscosity wetting of interfaces and high thermal conductivity are essential, or whether ordinary liquid immersion already helps.
  • For single-photon detectors, the persistent fast quasiparticle transient means helium immersion improves repetition rate only up to the point set by quasiparticle recombination, so detector designs would still need to address quasiparticle poisoning directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports time-resolved microwave measurements of NbN and Nb superconducting resonators under pulsed 1560/1550 nm laser illumination, in vacuum and in superfluid helium-4 at millikelvin temperatures. In vacuum, the resonance frequency drifts downward during the optical pulse and recovers slowly after the pulse, with 5 and 8 µs pulses showing incomplete recovery within the 1 ms repetition period. In superfluid helium, the resonance remains stable during illumination and recovers within about 1 µs for the NbN resonator and about 10 µs for the Nb resonator. The authors interpret this as a three-orders-of-magnitude faster recovery enabled by efficient thermal phonon escape through the superconductor-helium interface, whereas the slow vacuum recovery is attributed to thermal boundary resistance at the superconductor-substrate interface. The paper also discusses quasiparticle and phonon dynamics, including an anomalous TLS-related frequency shift in the Nb resonator.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result provides a practical path toward high-repetition-rate operation of superconducting microwave-optical hybrid devices, which is relevant for photon detection and quantum transduction. The direct experimental comparison across two material systems and several pulse widths is a useful contribution, and the authors are appropriately careful in framing much of the mechanism discussion as qualitative. The data and code availability statements are positive but would be strengthened by deposition in a permanent repository. The quantitative and mechanistic conclusions, however, rest on two assumptions that are not fully demonstrated: that the absorbed optical power is the same in vacuum and in superfluid helium, and that single-shot traces without repeated measurements suffice to support a three-orders-of-magnitude quantitative claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II.C] The faster recovery in helium is attributed to enhanced thermal phonon escape, but the comparison does not hold the absorbed optical power constant. Immersion in superfluid helium changes the dielectric environment, as evidenced by the 19.04 MHz and 19.76 MHz resonant-frequency shifts and the changes in Q values reported in Section II.C. For the NbN chip, the grating-coupler transmission is quoted only for vacuum (-22 dB at 1560 nm), and helium immersion will shift the coupler passband and radiation pattern; for the edge-coupled Nb chip, the scattering and absorption geometry can also change. Since the laser power is fixed only at the fiber-chip interface, a smaller absorbed energy per pulse in helium could explain the disappearance of the slow thermal drift and the fast recovery without invoking superfluid heat-escape. The authors should calibrate the on-chip optical power or absorbed power in both environments, or provide a control experiment that matches the optical heat load, before the mechanistic conclusion in Sections II.B and II.C can be regarded as established.
  2. [Section II.C] The stated three-orders-of-magnitude recovery improvement is based on an inequality: in vacuum with 5 and 8 µs pulses the resonance 'fails to fully recover within the 1-ms repetition period,' while in helium the NbN resonance recovers in about 1 µs. This gives a ratio of at least 1000, not a measured value of exactly three orders of magnitude. The manuscript should state this as a lower bound, and preferably measure the actual vacuum recovery time for the longer pulses, or at least quote the 1 ms limit explicitly as a bound rather than as an equality.
  3. [Section II.B/C] No repeated measurements, error bars, or statistical analysis are presented for any of the quoted quantities, including the Qtot and Qin values, the recovery times, and the frequency shifts. The central quantitative claim relies on single traces and single-point values (e.g., Qtot dropping to 1.7 k and Qin to 8.7 k in helium). The authors should report at least a small number of repeated measurements and estimate uncertainties, or explicitly state that the observations are single-shot qualitative demonstrations and reduce the quantitative emphasis accordingly.
  4. [Section II.C] The proposed mechanism—that superfluid helium provides an efficient parallel phonon escape path and 'efficiently thermalizes the system'—is inferred from the absence of slow frequency drift, not from direct temperature or phonon-flux measurements. This is a plausible interpretation, but it is not uniquely determined by the data; for example, a reduction in absorbed optical power would also remove the slow drift. The manuscript should either present a direct measurement of the thermal response or explicitly acknowledge that the mechanism is conditional on the absorbed-power calibration being identical in the two environments.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2] The axis label 'Frequnecy (GHz)' contains a typo and should read 'Frequency (GHz)'.
  2. [Section V] The acknowledgment contains 'ARFL discloses' which appears to be a typo for 'AFRL discloses'.
  3. [VI and VII] The data and code availability statements say materials are available 'upon reasonable request'; for reproducibility, the authors should deposit the processed data and analysis scripts in a permanent public repository.
  4. [Section II.B] The anomalous TLS-related frequency upshift at the pulse rise edge is discussed at length, but the paper does not provide a quantitative estimate of the TLS contribution versus the QP contribution; a brief model or a reference to a quantitative analysis would make this section more conclusive.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: direct experimental comparison with independently cited physics.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an empirical comparison: measured transient resonance recovery in vacuum versus superfluid helium-4, with recovery rates read directly from time traces. No parameter is fitted and then renamed as a prediction, and no output quantity is defined in terms of the input quantity. The mechanism discussion invokes established external results (thermal boundary resistance, quasiparticle lifetimes, two-level-system theory, superfluid helium properties). The only self-citations, notably reference [41] for the NbN device geometry and for the ripple-interference interpretation, are not load-bearing for the three-orders-of-magnitude recovery claim; that claim would stand unchanged even if those interpretations were incorrect. There is no derivation chain in which an equation reduces to its own input, and the comparison against external benchmarks is self-contained. Accordingly, no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The work makes no parameter fits; its interpretation relies on standard superconductivity and thermal-transport assumptions. The main non-standard interpretive step is attributing the Nb positive frequency shift to TLS, which the paper itself flags as uncertain. No invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Optical photons absorbed in the superconductor break Cooper pairs, increasing quasiparticle density and kinetic inductance, which shifts the resonant frequency down.
    Invoked in Sections II.B and II.C to interpret the fast frequency shifts at laser pulse edges; this is standard superconductivity but not directly verified in this work.
  • ad hoc to paper The slow resonant frequency shift during laser pulse-on in vacuum is dominated by thermal phonon accumulation limited by thermal boundary resistance at the superconductor-substrate interface.
    Section II.B attributes slow shifts to phonon-related heating; this is a modeling interpretation, not measured locally.
  • domain assumption Immersing the device in superfluid 4He creates an extended superconductor-helium interface with efficient thermal phonon escape, so heat is dissipated before it causes slow frequency shifts.
    Section II.C relies on this to explain the observed stable resonance and fast recovery in He-II.
  • domain assumption The optical illumination conditions (absorbed power and spatial distribution) are qualitatively similar in vacuum and superfluid helium.
    The paper argues non-local scattered excitation makes conditions similar, but optical power absorbed is not measured in either case.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fast Recovery of Niobium-based Superconducting Resonators after Laser Illumination." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XV4PQ5UO

@misc{pith2026250716082,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fast Recovery of Niobium-based Superconducting Resonators after Laser Illumination},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XV4PQ5UO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16082}
}
read the original abstract

Interfacing superconducting microwave resonators with optical systems enables sensitive photon detectors, quantum transducers, and related quantum technologies. Achieving high optical pulse repetition is crucial for maximizing the device throughput. However, light-induced deterioration, such as quasiparticle poisoning, pair-breaking-phonon generation, and elevated temperature, hinders the rapid recovery of superconducting circuits, limiting their ability to sustain high optical pulse repetition rates. Understanding these loss mechanisms and enabling fast circuit recovery are therefore critical. In this work, we investigate the impact of optical illumination on niobium nitride and niobium microwave resonators by immersing them in superfluid helium-4 and demonstrate a three-order-of-magnitude faster resonance recovery compared to vacuum. By analyzing transient resonance responses, we provide insights into light-induced dynamics in these superconductors, highlighting the advantages of niobium-based superconductors and superfluid helium for rapid circuit recovery in superconducting quantum systems integrated with optical fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.16082 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic drawing of the NbN resonator under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The time evolution of the NbN resonator’s resonance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The time evolution of the Nb resonator’s resonance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A kilometer photonic link connecting superconducting circuits in two dilution refrigerators

    quant-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A pair of frequency-matched aluminum nitride electro-optic transducers connected by a 1-km telecom fiber demonstrated coherent microwave-to-optical-to-microwave signal transfer between two dilution refrigerators.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    W., Pernice, W., Srinivasan, K., Benson, O

    Elshaari, A. W., Pernice, W., Srinivasan, K., Benson, O. & Zwiller, V. Hybrid integrated quantum photonic circuits. Nature Photonics 14, 285–298 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    Shen, M. et al. Photonic link from single-flux-quantum circuits to room temperature. Nature Photonics18, 371– 378 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Hadfield, R. H. Single-photon detectors for optical quan- tum information applications. Nature Photonics 3, 696– 705 (2009). 7

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Sprengers, J. et al. Waveguide superconducting single- photon detectors for integrated quantum photonic cir- cuits. Applied Physics Letters99 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Superconducting nanowire single-photon detec- tors for quantum information

    You, L. Superconducting nanowire single-photon detec- tors for quantum information. Nanophotonics 9, 2673– 2692 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Rueda, A. et al. Efficient microwave to optical photon conversion: an electro-optical realization. Optica 3, 597– 604 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Fan, L. et al. Superconducting cavity electro-optics: a platform for coherent photon conversion between super- conducting and photonic circuits. Science Advances 4, eaar4994 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Xu, Y. et al. Bidirectional interconversion of microwave and light with thin-film lithium niobate. Nature Com- munications 12, 4453 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    Sahu, R. et al. Quantum-enabled operation of a microwave-optical interface. Nature Communications13, 1276 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    & Girvin, S

    Schoelkopf, R. & Girvin, S. Wiring up quantum systems. Nature 451, 664–669 (2008)

    2008

  3. [11]

    Zhong, C. et al. Proposal for heralded generation and detection of entangled microwave–optical-photon pairs. Physical Review Letters124, 010511 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    M., Sørensen, A

    Jiang, L., Taylor, J. M., Sørensen, A. S. & Lukin, M. D. Distributed quantum computation based on small quan- tum registers. Physical Review A76, 062323 (2007)

    2007

  5. [13]

    I., Zoller, P., Kimble, H

    Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P., Kimble, H. J. & Mabuchi, H. Quantum state transfer and entanglement distribution among distant nodes in a quantum network. Physical Review Letters 78, 3221 (1997)

    1997

  6. [14]

    Il’in, K. et al. Picosecond hot-electron energy relaxation in NbN superconducting photodetectors. Applied Physics Letters 76, 2752–2754 (2000)

    2000

  7. [15]

    Beck, M. et al. Energy-gap dynamics of superconducting nbn thin films studied by time-resolved terahertz spec- troscopy. Physical Review Letters107, 177007 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Barends, R. et al. Minimizing quasiparticle generation from stray infrared light in superconducting quantum cir- cuits. Applied Physics Letters99 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    et al.The electron-phonon relaxation time in thin superconducting titanium nitride films

    Kardakova, A. et al.The electron-phonon relaxation time in thin superconducting titanium nitride films. Applied Physics Letters 103 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Benevides, R. et al. Quasiparticle dynamics in a su- perconducting qubit irradiated by a localized infrared source. Physical Review Letters133, 060602 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Kozorezov, A. et al. Quasiparticle-phonon downconver- sion in nonequilibrium superconductors. Physical Review B 61, 11807 (2000)

    2000

  12. [20]

    V., Plourde, B., Vavilov, M

    Patel, U., Pechenezhskiy, I. V., Plourde, B., Vavilov, M. & McDermott, R. Phonon-mediated quasiparticle poi- soning of superconducting microwave resonators. Physi- cal Review B96, 220501 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Iaia, V. et al. Phonon downconversion to suppress corre- lated errors in superconducting qubits. Nature Commu- nications 13, 6425 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    & Umlauf, E

    Schmidt, C. & Umlauf, E. Thermal boundary resistance at interfaces between sapphire and indium. Journal of Low Temperature Physics22, 597–611 (1976)

    1976

  15. [23]

    & Kn¨ oner, R

    Sahling, S., Engert, J., Gladun, A. & Kn¨ oner, R. The thermal boundary resistance between sapphire and alu- minum monocrystals at low temperature. Journal of Low Temperature Physics45, 457–469 (1981)

    1981

  16. [24]

    Swartz, E. T. & Pohl, R. O. Thermal boundary resis- tance. Reviews of Modern Physics61, 605 (1989)

    1989

  17. [25]

    Quantum information processing with atoms and photons

    Monroe, C. Quantum information processing with atoms and photons. Nature 416, 238–246 (2002)

    2002

  18. [26]

    Quantum information processing with su- perconducting circuits: a review

    Wendin, G. Quantum information processing with su- perconducting circuits: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics 80, 106001 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Blais, A., Girvin, S. M. & Oliver, W. D. Quantum in- formation processing and quantum optics with circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature Physics 16, 247–256 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Men’shchikov, E. et al. Superconducting fast detector based on the nonequilibrium inductance response of a film of niobium nitride. Technical Physics Letters 23, 486–488 (1997)

    1997

  21. [29]

    Ferrari, S. et al. Hot-spot relaxation time current depen- dence in niobium nitride waveguide-integrated supercon- ducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Optics Express 25, 8739–8750 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Uzawa, Y. et al. Optical and tunneling studies of energy gap in superconducting niobium nitride films. Journal of Low Temperature Physics199, 143–148 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Haberkorn, N. et al. Probing the Quasiparticle Relax- ation Time in Ultrathin NbN Microbridges via Larkin– Ovchinnikov Instability Near Tc. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 6, 5077–5084 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Kaplan, S. B. et al. Quasiparticle and phonon lifetimes in superconductors. Physical Review B14, 4854 (1976)

    1976

  25. [33]

    & Blamire, M

    Warburton, P. & Blamire, M. Quasiparticle lifetimes in epitaxial niobium and tantalum films. IEEE Transac- tions on Applied Superconductivity5, 3022–3025 (1995)

    1995

  26. [34]

    Lobo, R. et al. Photoinduced time-resolved electrody- namics of superconducting metals and alloys. Physical Review B 72, 024510 (2005)

    2005

  27. [35]

    Superconducting kinetic inductance de- tectors: theory, simulations & experiments

    Vardulakis, G. Superconducting kinetic inductance de- tectors: theory, simulations & experiments. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge (2007)

    2007

  28. [36]

    Photon-detecting superconducting res- onators

    Barends, R. Photon-detecting superconducting res- onators. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology (2009)

    2009

  29. [37]

    Anderson, P. W. Considerations on the flow of superfluid helium. Reviews of Modern Physics38, 298 (1966)

    1966

  30. [38]

    Brooks, J. S. & Donnelly, R. J. The calculated thermo- dynamic properties of superfluid helium-4. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data6, 51–104 (1977)

    1977

  31. [39]

    S., Jou, D

    Mongiov ` ı, M. S., Jou, D. & Sciacca, M. Non-equilibrium thermodynamics, heat transport and thermal waves in laminar and turbulent superfluid helium. Physics Reports 726, 1–71 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Minowa, Y. et al. Optical trapping of nanoparticles in superfluid helium. Optica 9, 139–144 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Xu, Y. et al. Light-induced dynamic frequency shifting of microwave photons in a superconducting electro-optic converter. Physical Review Applied18, 064045 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Cheng, L., Mao, S., Li, Z., Han, Y. & Fu, H. Grating couplers on silicon photonics: Design principles, emerg- ing trends and practical issues. Micromachines 11, 666 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    McKenna, T. P. et al. Alignment-free cryogenic optical coupling to an optomechanical crystal. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05293 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Merberg, G. N. & Harrington, J. A. Optical and mechan- ical properties of single-crystal sapphire optical fibers. Applied optics 32, 3201–3209 (1993). 8

    1993

  37. [45]

    Soref, R. A. Silicon-based optoelectronics. Proceedings of the IEEE81, 1687–1706 (2002)

    2002

  38. [46]

    Micro-resonator optomechanics with superfluid helium

    He, X. Micro-resonator optomechanics with superfluid helium. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Queensland (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    Wasserman, W. et al. Cryogenic and hermetically sealed packaging of photonic chips for optomechanics. Optics Express 30, 30822–30831 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    Circuit quantum electrodynamics with elec- trons on helium

    Yang, G. Circuit quantum electrodynamics with elec- trons on helium. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Chicago (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    Zhou, X. et al. Single electrons on solid neon as a solid- state qubit platform. Nature 605, 46–50 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Thiemann, M. et al. Niobium stripline resonators for mi- crowave studies on superconductors. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 568, 022043 (2014)

    2014

  43. [51]

    Valenti, F. et al. Interplay between kinetic inductance, nonlinearity, and quasiparticle dynamics in granular alu- minum microwave kinetic inductance detectors. Physical Review Applied 11, 054087 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    et al.Photoresponse of nb films; observation of biexponential recovery times of the superconducting state

    Johnson, M. et al.Photoresponse of nb films; observation of biexponential recovery times of the superconducting state. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics27 (1991)

    1991

  45. [53]

    & Wilson, R

    Riffe, D. & Wilson, R. B. Excitation and relaxation of nonthermal electron energy distributions in metals with application to gold. Physical Review B 107, 214309 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Takeda, K. et al. Ultrafast electron-electron scattering in metallic phase of 2 h-nbse 2 probed by high harmonic generation. Physical Review Letters132, 186901 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    de Visser, P. J. et al.Number fluctuations of sparse quasi- particles in a superconductor. Physical Review Letters 106, 167004 (2011)

    2011

  48. [56]

    et al.Effects of nonequilibrium quasiparticles in a thin-film superconducting microwave resonator un- der optical illumination

    Budoyo, R. et al.Effects of nonequilibrium quasiparticles in a thin-film superconducting microwave resonator un- der optical illumination. Physical Review B93, 024514 (2016)

    2016

  49. [57]

    & Tang, H

    Xu, M., Han, X., Fu, W., Zou, C.-L. & Tang, H. X. Frequency-tunable high-q superconducting resonators via wireless control of nonlinear kinetic inductance. Ap- plied Physics Letters114 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    & Bylander, J

    Niepce, D., Burnett, J. & Bylander, J. High kinetic in- ductance nb n nanowire superinductors. Physical Review Applied 11, 044014 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    Frasca, S. et al. Nbn films with high kinetic inductance for high-quality compact superconducting resonators. Physical Review Applied20, 044021 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    & Hunklinger, S

    Von Schickfus, M. & Hunklinger, S. Saturation of the di- electric absorption of vitreous silica at low temperatures. Physics Letters A64, 144–146 (1977)

    1977

  53. [61]

    & Hunklinger, S

    Strom, U., Von Schickfus, M. & Hunklinger, S. Low- temperature anomalies in the microwave dielectric prop- erties of na β-alumina. Physical Review Letters41, 910 (1978)

    1978

  54. [62]

    Phillips, W. A. Two-level states in glasses. Reports on Progress in Physics50, 1657 (1987)

    1987

  55. [63]

    Gao, J. et al. Experimental evidence for a surface distribution of two-level systems in superconducting lithographed microwave resonators. Applied Physics Let- ters 92 (2008)

    2008

  56. [64]

    & Tzalenchuk, A

    Lindstr¨ om, T., Healey, J., Colclough, M., Muirhead, C. & Tzalenchuk, A. Y. Properties of superconducting planar resonators at millikelvin temperatures. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics80, 132501 (2009)

    2009

  57. [65]

    Development of Niobium Superconducting Microwave Resonators

    Fischer, F. Development of Niobium Superconducting Microwave Resonators. Ph.D. thesis, Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    Bruno, A. et al. Reducing intrinsic loss in superconduct- ing resonators by surface treatment and deep etching of silicon substrates. Applied Physics Letters106 (2015)

    2015

  59. [67]

    Murthy, A. A. et al.Developing a chemical and structural understanding of the surface oxide in a niobium super- conducting qubit. ACS nano 16, 17257–17262 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Wang, Y. et al. Photon-induced thermal effects in su- perconducting coplanar waveguide resonators. Journal of Applied Physics114 (2013)

    2013

  61. [69]

    Poorgholam-Khanjari, S. et al. Engineering high-q su- perconducting tantalum microwave coplanar waveguide resonators for compact coherent quantum circuits. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16099 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Foshat, P. et al. Characterizing niobium nitride-based superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators for mi- crowave hybrid circuit quantum electrodynamics. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity(2025)

    2025

  63. [71]

    & Zheludev, N

    Savinov, V., Delfanazari, K., Fedotov, V. & Zheludev, N. I. Giant nonlinearity in a superconducting sub- terahertz metamaterial. Applied Physics Letters 108 (2016)

    2016

  64. [72]

    Kalhor, S. et al. Active terahertz modulator and slow light metamaterial devices with hybrid graphene– superconductor photonic integrated circuits. Nanomate- rials 11, 2999 (2021)

    2021

  65. [73]

    Lane, J. et al. Integrating superfluids with supercon- ducting qubit systems. Physical Review A101, 012336 (2020)

    2020

  66. [74]

    Lucas, M. et al. Quantum bath suppression in a super- conducting circuit by immersion cooling. Nature Com- munications 14, 3522 (2023)

    2023

  67. [75]

    Viscosity of liquid helium below the λ-point

    Kapitza, P. Viscosity of liquid helium below the λ-point. Nature 141, 74–74 (1938)

    1938

  68. [76]

    Leggett, A. J. Superfluidity. Reviews of Modern Physics 71, S318 (1999)

    1999

  69. [77]

    Gomez, L. F. et al. Shapes and vorticities of superfluid helium nanodroplets. Science 345, 906–909 (2014)

    2014

  70. [78]

    P., Vissers, M

    Pappas, D. P., Vissers, M. R., Wisbey, D. S., Kline, J. S. & Gao, J. Two level system loss in superconducting mi- crowave resonators. IEEE Transactions on Applied Su- perconductivity 21, 871–874 (2011)

    2011

  71. [79]

    & Ioffe, L

    Faoro, L. & Ioffe, L. B. Internal loss of superconduct- ing resonators induced by interacting two-level systems. Physical Review Letters109, 157005 (2012)

    2012

  72. [80]

    M¨ uller, C., Cole, J. H. & Lisenfeld, J. Towards under- standing two-level-systems in amorphous solids: insights from quantum circuits. Reports on Progress in Physics 82, 124501 (2019)

    2019

  73. [81]

    De Graaf, S. et al. Two-level systems in superconducting quantum devices due to trapped quasiparticles. Science Advances 6, eabc5055 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.