Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 66 references

Persistent paramagnons in high-temperature infinite-layer nickelate superconductors

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper reports that in Sm-based infinite-layer nickelates, the effective exchange coupling is about 20% smaller than in Pr-based compounds even though Tc is twice as high, opposite to the cuprate trend.

desk verdict First RIXS look at Sm-based infinite-layer nickelates; the data are solid and useful, but the headline Tc-versus-J comparison rests on a ~1.2-sigma difference and uncontrolled cross-beamline systematics. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18373 v1 pith:EQKVDSJ2 submitted 2025-07-24 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

Yujie Yan , Ying Chan , Xunyang Hong , S. Lin Er Chow , Zhaoyang Luo , Yuehong Li , Tianren Wang , Yuetong Wu
show 20 more authors
Izabela Bia{l}o Nurul Fitriyah Saurav Prakash Xing Gao King Yau Yip Qiang Gao Xiaolin Ren Jaewon Choi Ganesha Channagowdra Jun Okamoto Xingjiang Zhou Zhihai Zhu Liang Si Mirian Garcia-Fernandez Ke-Jin Zhou Hsiao-Yu Huang Di-Jing Huang Johan Chang A. Ariando Qisi Wang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.str-el
keywords infinite-layernickelatesRIXSparamagnonexchangecouplingsuperconductivitySmNiO2spinfluctuationsTcenhancement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what determines the high superconducting transition temperature in the new Sm-based infinite-layer nickelate (SECS). Using resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, the authors observe paramagnons—spin excitations—in both optimally and overdoped SECS and measure their dispersion. Fitting the dispersion with a spin-wave model, they find the nearest-neighbor exchange coupling is about 20% weaker in SECS than in the Pr-based compound PSNO, even though SECS superconducts at a much higher temperature. That is the opposite of the cuprate correlation between magnetic coupling and Tc, pointing to other ingredients—such as three-dimensionality or rare-earth hybridization—as important for pairing.

What carries the argument

The core object is the paramagnon, a damped collective spin excitation of the nickelate planes, measured by Ni $L$-edge RIXS. Its momentum-dependent pole energy is fit to a linear spin-wave dispersion for a doped $S=1/2$ square lattice with nearest- ($J_1$) and next-nearest-neighbor ($J_2$) exchange, rescaling magnon energies by a quantum renormalization factor $Z_c = 1.187$. This converts the measured bandwidth and zone-boundary curvature into exchange couplings, enabling the comparison between SECS and PSNO.

What would settle it

A phase-pure undoped SmNiO2 would allow a model-independent check: if its magnon bandwidth is not close to 100 meV, then the small $J_1$ in SECS is a doping-induced softening rather than a property of the Sm-based rare earth, and the comparison with PSNO would no longer support the paper's conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the effective nearest-neighbour exchange coupling in optimally doped Sm-based infinite-layer nickelate (SECS) is $J_1 = 46.6 \pm 4.9$ meV, about 20% smaller than in Pr-based PSNO ($J_1 = 57.3 \pm 7.1$ meV), while the superconducting onset temperature is roughly four times higher (35 K vs 9 K). This inverted relation between magnetic coupling and $T_c$ is the opposite of what is seen in hole-doped cuprates and implies that in-plane spin fluctuations alone do not set the $T_c$ scale in nickelates.

Load-bearing premise

The central inference rests on assuming that the RIXS peak is a single paramagnon describable by a linear spin-wave model with a fixed renormalization factor even at 19% hole doping; if the mode includes multi-magnon or charge contributions, the fitted $J_1$ values are not true exchange couplings.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the exchange coupling is genuinely weaker while $T_c$ is higher, in-plane spin fluctuations alone cannot set the $T_c$ scale in infinite-layer nickelates.
  • The persistence of a large exchange coupling (~47 meV) in a superconductor with $T_c \sim 35$ K keeps spin-fluctuation-mediated pairing viable, but its strength is not the limiting factor.
  • The observed doping softening of the paramagnon in overdoped SECS resembles cuprate behavior, suggesting a common evolution of spin correlations with hole doping.
  • A cuprate-like design rule—maximize in-plane magnetic coupling to maximize $T_c$—does not transfer to nickelates; other parameters, such as interlayer coupling or rare-earth 5$d$ hybridization, must be tuned instead.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 20% contrast is based on comparing two different rare-earth hosts at slightly different lattice constants and doping; a systematic series across rare-earth elements with identical doping would test whether the trend is monotonic in ionic radius.
  • If the effective coupling reduction comes from added three-dimensionality, one might expect an out-of-plane exchange $J_\perp$ to appear; measuring the $c$-axis dispersion of the paramagnon (if any) would directly confirm the proposed mechanism.
  • The interpretation hinges on the validity of a single-magnon model at 19% doping; an alternative doped-spin-wave treatment might shift both $J_1$ values but the relative ordering is likely robust, strengthening the qualitative conclusion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports Ni L-edge resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) measurements on superconducting Sm-based infinite-layer nickelate thin films (SECS), including an optimally doped sample with Tc,onset ~35 K and an overdoped sample, and compares them with optimally doped Pr-based PSNO films. Dispersive paramagnon modes are observed in both SECS doping levels and in PSNO. Fitting the extracted dispersion with a J1-J2 linear spin-wave model yields J1 = 46.6 ± 4.9 meV and J2 = -2.4 ± 3.7 meV for OP SECS, and J1 = 57.3 ± 7.1 meV and J2 = -1.6 ± 5.2 meV for OP PSNO. The authors interpret the roughly 20% smaller effective exchange coupling in SECS, despite its higher Tc, as contrasting with the positive Tc-exchange correlation in hole-doped cuprates, and suggest that additional factors such as multi-band effects and rare-earth hybridization control Tc in the nickelates.

Significance. If the central comparison is correct, the paper reports a notable result: the highest-Tc infinite-layer nickelate would have a smaller in-plane exchange coupling than a lower-Tc Pr-based counterpart, inverting the cuprate-like Tc-J correlation. This would sharpen the case that spin fluctuations alone do not set the Tc scale in these nickelates and would motivate further work on rare-earth 5d hybridization and three-dimensionality. The raw data also provide a useful new measurement of paramagnons in the Sm-based family. However, the key quantitative claim currently rests on a difference that is only about 1.2 standard deviations given the quoted errors, and the two compounds were measured at different beamlines with different resolutions, temperatures, and sample environments, with no explicit systematic-error budget. The significance of the paper therefore depends on whether the statistical and systematic basis of the J1 comparison can be strengthened.

major comments (3)
  1. [Discussion and Fig. 3e] The central claim of a ~20% reduction in J1 is based on J1(SECS) = 46.6 ± 4.9 meV versus J1(PSNO) = 57.3 ± 7.1 meV. The difference is 10.7 meV, while the quadrature uncertainty is sqrt(4.9^2 + 7.1^2) = 8.6 meV, giving a significance of about 1.2 sigma (two-sided p ~ 0.21). By standard statistical criteria, these data do not establish a reduction, let alone a quantitative 20% value. Because the abstract and discussion present this comparison as the main finding, the authors should either provide substantially smaller or better-justified uncertainties, a joint fit that directly tests the difference, or explicitly reframe the claim as a tentative trend.
  2. [Methods: RIXS experiments] The SECS and PSNO data were collected on different beamlines with different energy resolutions (67 meV at TPS 41A versus 46 meV at Diamond I21), at different sample temperatures (30 K versus 16 K), with different scattering geometries, and on different film/substrate/cap stacks. The authors state that the 'beamline-specific photon energy offset has not been considered.' No cross-calibration or shared reference sample is reported. For broad damped modes, a resolution difference of this size can bias fitted damped-harmonic-oscillator pole positions by an amount comparable to the claimed 10.7 meV difference. The authors should provide a systematic uncertainty estimate or demonstrate, for example through a resolution-matching analysis, that the SECS-versus-PSNO comparison is robust to these experimental differences.
  3. [Discussion and Eq. (1)] The exchange couplings are extracted by applying an undoped S = 1/2 linear spin-wave model with a fixed quantum renormalization factor Zc = 1.187 to OP SECS at nominal doping p = 0.19. At this doping the magnon is already strongly damped and softened by hole doping, as the paper itself acknowledges when interpreting the reduced effective couplings. The fitted J1 and J2 are therefore effective parameters whose relation to intrinsic exchange constants is model-dependent. If the low-energy RIXS mode contains significant multi-magnon or charge spectral weight, or if the undoped spin-wave description is quantitatively inappropriate at p = 0.19, the 20% comparison between SECS and PSNO may not be meaningful. The manuscript should at least discuss the sensitivity of J1 to the choice of Zc and to potential multi-magnon contributions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption for panel (b) uses 'PNSO' instead of 'PSNO'; this typo should be corrected.
  2. [Introduction] The text contains 'nickealtes' instead of 'nickelates' in the sentence discussing charge order; this should be corrected.
  3. [Methods: RIXS experiments] Since the SECS and PSNO data were taken at 30 K and 16 K, respectively, a brief statement on whether temperature renormalization of the paramagnon could affect the comparison would be helpful.
  4. [Data availability] The data availability statement only offers data 'on a reasonable request'; for a quantitative claim of this nature, deposition in a public repository would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: exchange couplings are fitted to RIXS spectra and compared with an independent first-principles calculation; no claimed prediction reduces to an input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is experimental and self-contained at the level of the claims made. RIXS spectra are fitted with a damped harmonic oscillator to extract paramagnon pole energies; those pole energies are then fitted to a linear spin-wave model with J1 and J2 as free parameters, yielding J1 = 46.6 ± 4.9 meV for SECS and J1 = 57.3 ± 7.1 meV for PSNO. The central comparison (a smaller effective J1 in SECS despite higher Tc) is a direct result of these fits, not a parameter reused as a prediction. The theoretical statement that SmNiO2 should have a ~20% smaller in-plane exchange coupling than (Nd/La/Pr)NiO2 is attributed to ref. 35, an independent first-principles calculation by a different group; it is not an input to the present fits. The quantum renormalization factor Zc = 1.187 is taken from prior work partially involving the same authors, but it is a standard spin-wave renormalization factor applied equally to both compounds; any error or model-dependence in Zc largely cancels in the relative SECS-versus-PSNO comparison, so this self-citation is not load-bearing for the paper's main claim. Potential concerns about cross-beamline systematics and statistical significance (the J1 difference is about 1.2σ with quoted errors) are correctness risks, not circularity. No equation in the paper is equivalent to its own output by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as an independent prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on fitting a damped harmonic oscillator to RIXS spectra and extracting J1 and J2 from the dispersion using a linear spin-wave model. The main free parameters are the exchange couplings and the damping; the main assumptions are that the mode is a single paramagnon and that the spin-wave model is valid for doped samples.

free parameters (5)
  • J1 (SECS) = 46.6 ± 4.9 meV
    Exchange coupling between nearest-neighbor Ni spins, fitted from the paramagnon dispersion using a linear spin-wave model (S=1/2, Zc=1.187).
  • J1 (PSNO) = 57.3 ± 7.1 meV
    Exchange coupling between nearest-neighbor Ni spins in PSNO, fitted with the same model.
  • J2 (SECS) = -2.4 ± 3.7 meV
    Next-nearest-neighbor exchange coupling from the same fit for SECS.
  • J2 (PSNO) = -1.6 ± 5.2 meV
    Next-nearest-neighbor exchange coupling from the same fit for PSNO.
  • Gamma (DHO damping) = not reported in main text
    Damping factor in the damped harmonic oscillator model, fitted for each spectrum to describe the paramagnon linewidth.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Linear spin-wave theory for the S=1/2 square-lattice Heisenberg model with quantum renormalization factor Zc=1.187.
    Used to convert the measured paramagnon dispersion into exchange couplings J1 and J2. This is a standard theoretical framework for square-lattice antiferromagnets.
  • domain assumption The low-energy RIXS mode is a single-magnon (paramagnon) excitation.
    The mode assignment relies on its dispersion and resonant profile; alternative interpretations (e.g., two-magnon or charge excitations) are not fully excluded.
  • domain assumption The linear spin-wave model remains valid for doped nickelates with p~0.2, with hole doping diluting the spin sites.
    The paper applies an undoped spin-wave model to extract J values from doped samples, following common practice in cuprate studies but not rigorously justified for nickelates.
  • domain assumption The RIXS cross-section at the Ni L-edge is dominated by spin-flip scattering, giving access to the magnetic response.
    The analysis assumes the measured intensity mainly reflects single-magnon scattering; contributions from other channels are treated as a smooth background.
  • domain assumption The nominal hole doping values (p=0.19 and p=0.31) correspond to the actual carrier concentrations in the films.
    The doping level is estimated from the nominal cation composition; no direct Hall or other measurement is reported in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Persistent paramagnons in high-temperature infinite-layer nickelate superconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EQKVDSJ2

@misc{pith2026250718373,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Persistent paramagnons in high-temperature infinite-layer nickelate superconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EQKVDSJ2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18373}
}
abstract

The recent discovery of high-temperature superconductivity in hole-doped SmNiO$_2$, exhibiting the record-high transition temperature $T_c$ among infinite-layer (IL) nickelates, has opened a new avenue for exploring design principles of superconductivity. Experimentally determining the electronic structure and magnetic interactions in this new system is crucial to elucidating the mechanism behind the enhanced superconductivity. Here, we report a Ni $L$-edge resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) study of superconducting Sm-based IL nickelate thin films Sm$_{1-x-y-z}$Eu$_x$Ca$_y$Sr$_z$NiO$_2$ (SECS). Dispersive paramagnonic excitations are observed in both optimally and overdoped SECS samples, supporting a spin-fluctuation-mediated pairing scenario. However, despite the two-fold enhancement of $T_c$ in the Sm-based nickelates compared to their Pr-based counterparts, the effective exchange coupling strength is reduced by approximately $20\%$. This behavior contrasts with hole-doped cuprates, where magnetic interactions correlate positively with $T_c$, highlighting essential differences in their superconducting mechanisms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18373 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Resistivity measurement, XAS, and RIXS intensity map for optimally doped SECS. (a) The temperature-dependent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Paramagnonic excitations in optimally doped SECS and PSNO. (a,b) Representative raw RIXS spectra of OP (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Dispersions of paramagnon in SECS and PSNO. (a-d) Paramagnon spectral components for OP PSNO (red) and SECS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Li , author K

    author author D. Li , author K. Lee , author B. Y. \ Wang , author M. Osada , author S. Crossley , author H. R. \ Lee , author Y. Cui , author Y. Hikita , \ and\ author H. Y. \ Hwang ,\ 10.1038/s41586-019-1496-5 journal journal Nature \ volume 572 ,\ pages 624 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1496-5

  2. [2]

    author author G. A. \ Pan , author D. Ferenc Segedin , author H. LaBollita , author Q. Song , author E. M. \ Nica , author B. H. \ Goodge , author A. T. \ Pierce , author S. Doyle , author S. Novakov , author D. Córdova Carrizales , author A. T. \ N’Diaye , author P. Shafer , author H. Paik , author J. T. \ Heron , author J. A. \ Mason , author A. Yacoby ...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-0

  3. [3]

    Sun , author M

    author author H. Sun , author M. Huo , author X. Hu , author J. Li , author Z. Liu , author Y. Han , author L. Tang , author Z. Mao , author P. Yang , author B. Wang , author J. Cheng , author D.-X. \ Yao , author G.-M. \ Zhang , \ and\ author M. Wang ,\ 10.1038/s41586-023-06408-7 journal journal Nature \ volume 621 ,\ pages 493 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06408-7

  4. [4]

    Zhu , author D

    author author Y. Zhu , author D. Peng , author E. Zhang , author B. Pan , author X. Chen , author L. Chen , author H. Ren , author F. Liu , author Y. Hao , author N. Li , author Z. Xing , author F. Lan , author J. Han , author J. Wang , author D. Jia , author H. Wo , author Y. Gu , author Y. Gu , author L. Ji , author W. Wang , author H. Gou , author Y. S...

  5. [5]

    author author V. I. \ Anisimov , author D. Bukhvalov , \ and\ author T. M. \ Rice ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.7901 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 59 ,\ pages 7901 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.7901 1999

  6. [6]

    author author A. S. \ Botana \ and\ author M. R. \ Norman ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.011024 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 10 ,\ pages 011024 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.011024 2020

  7. [7]

    Lu , author M

    author author H. Lu , author M. Rossi , author A. Nag , author M. Osada , author D. F. \ Li , author K. Lee , author B. Y. \ Wang , author M. Garcia-Fernandez , author S. Agrestini , author Z. X. \ Shen , author E. M. \ Been , author B. Moritz , author T. P. \ Devereaux , author J. Zaanen , author H. Y. \ Hwang , author K.-J. \ Zhou , \ and\ author W. S. ...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abd7726

  8. [8]

    Ding , author Y

    author author X. Ding , author Y. Fan , author X. Wang , author C. Li , author Z. An , author J. Ye , author S. Tang , author M. Lei , author X. Sun , author N. Guo , author Z. Chen , author S. Sangphet , author Y. Wang , author H. Xu , author R. Peng , \ and\ author D. Feng ,\ 10.1093/nsr/nwae194 journal journal Natl. Sci. Rev. \ volume 11 ,\ pages nwae1...

    work page doi:10.1093/nsr/nwae194

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Sun , author Z

    author author W. Sun , author Z. Jiang , author C. Xia , author B. Hao , author S. Yan , author M. Wang , author Y. Li , author H. Liu , author J. Ding , author J. Liu , author Z. Liu , author J. Liu , author H. Chen , author D. Shen , \ and\ author Y. Nie ,\ 10.1126/sciadv.ad...

    doi

  2. [10]

    Li , author Y

    author author C. Li , author Y. Chen , author X. Ding , author Y. Zhuang , author N. Guo , author Z. Chen , author Y. Fan , author J. Ye , author Z. An , author S. Sangphet , author S. Tang , author X. Wang , author H. Huang , author H. Xu , author D. Feng , \ and\ author R. P...

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Lee , author B

    author author K. Lee , author B. Y. \ Wang , author M. Osada , author B. H. \ Goodge , author T. C. \ Wang , author Y. Lee , author S. Harvey , author W. J. \ Kim , author Y. Yu , author C. Murthy , author S. Raghu , author L. F. \ Kourkoutis , \ and\ author H. Y. \ Hwang ,\ 1...

    doi

  4. [12]

    \ Hsu , author K

    author author Y.-T. \ Hsu , author K. Lee , author S. Badoux , author C. Duffy , author A. Cuoghi , author B. Y. \ Wang , author A. Kool , author I. Haïk-Dunn , author H. Y. \ Hwang , \ and\ author N. E. \ Hussey ,\ 10.1038/s41467-024-54135-y journal journal Nat. Commun. \ vol...

    doi

  5. [13]

    \ Lee \ and\ author W

    author author K.-W. \ Lee \ and\ author W. E. \ Pickett ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.165109 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 70 ,\ pages 165109 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  6. [14]

    Kitatani , author L

    author author M. Kitatani , author L. Si , author O. Janson , author R. Arita , author Z. Zhong , \ and\ author K. Held ,\ 10.1038/s41535-020-00260-y journal journal npj Quantum Mater. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 59 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Chen , author M

    author author Z. Chen , author M. Osada , author D. Li , author E. M. \ Been , author S.-D. \ Chen , author M. Hashimoto , author D. Lu , author S.-K. \ Mo , author K. Lee , author B. Y. \ Wang , author F. Rodolakis , author J. L. \ McChesney , author C. Jia , author B. Moritz...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Si , author E

    author author L. Si , author E. Jacob , author W. Wu , author A. Hausoel , author J. Krsnik , author P. Worm , author S. Di Cataldo , author O. Janson , \ and\ author K. Held ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043104 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 043104 ( year ...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Lechermann ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041002 journal journal Phys

    author author F. Lechermann ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041002 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 10 ,\ pages 041002 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    Comin \ and\ author A

    author author R. Comin \ and\ author A. Damascelli ,\ 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031115-011401 journal journal Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 369 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    von Arx , author Q

    author author K. von Arx , author Q. Wang , author S. Mustafi , author D. G. \ Mazzone , author M. Horio , author D. J. \ Mukkattukavil , author E. Pomjakushina , author S. Pyon , author T. Takayama , author H. Takagi , author T. Kurosawa , author N. Momono , author M. Oda , a...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Rossi , author M

    author author M. Rossi , author M. Osada , author J. Choi , author S. Agrestini , author D. Jost , author Y. Lee , author H. Lu , author B. Y. \ Wang , author K. Lee , author A. Nag , author Y.-D. \ Chuang , author C.-T. \ Kuo , author S.-J. \ Lee , author B. Moritz , author T...

    doi

  13. [21]

    author author C. C. \ Tam , author J. Choi , author X. Ding , author S. Agrestini , author A. Nag , author M. Wu , author B. Huang , author H. Luo , author P. Gao , author M. García-Fernández , author L. Qiao , \ and\ author K.-J. \ Zhou ,\ 10.1038/s41563-022-01330-1 journal j...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Krieger , author L

    author author G. Krieger , author L. Martinelli , author S. Zeng , author L. E. \ Chow , author K. Kummer , author R. Arpaia , author M. Moretti Sala , author N. B. \ Brookes , author A. Ariando , author N. Viart , author M. Salluzzo , author G. Ghiringhelli , \ and\ author D....

    doi

  15. [23]

    Ren , author R

    author author X. Ren , author R. Sutarto , author Q. Gao , author Q. Wang , author J. Li , author Y. Wang , author T. Xiang , author J. Hu , author J. Chang , author R. Comin , author X. J. \ Zhou , \ and\ author Z. Zhu ,\ 10.1088/0256-307X/41/11/117404 journal journal Chin. P...

    doi

  16. [24]

    author author C. T. \ Parzyck , author N. K. \ Gupta , author Y. Wu , author V. Anil , author L. Bhatt , author M. Bouliane , author R. Gong , author B. Z. \ Gregory , author A. Luo , author R. Sutarto , author F. He , author Y.-D. \ Chuang , author T. Zhou , author G. Herranz...

    doi

  17. [25]

    Oppliger , author J

    author author J. Oppliger , author J. Küspert , author A.-C. \ Dippel , author M. v. Zimmermann , author O. Gutowski , author X. Ren , author X. Zhou , author Z. Zhu , author R. Frison , author Q. Wang , author L. Martinelli , author I. Biało , \ and\ author J. Chang ,\ 10.103...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Hepting , author D

    author author M. Hepting , author D. Li , author C. J. \ Jia , author H. Lu , author E. Paris , author Y. Tseng , author X. Feng , author M. Osada , author E. Been , author Y. Hikita , author Y.-D. \ Chuang , author Z. Hussain , author K. J. \ Zhou , author A. Nag , author M. ...

  19. [27]

    Li , author B

    author author D. Li , author B. Y. \ Wang , author K. Lee , author S. P. \ Harvey , author M. Osada , author B. H. \ Goodge , author L. F. \ Kourkoutis , \ and\ author H. Y. \ Hwang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.027001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 125 ,\ pages 027001...

    doi

  20. [28]

    author author S. P. \ Harvey , author B. Y. \ Wang , author J. Fowlie , author M. Osada , author K. Lee , author Y. Lee , author D. Li , \ and\ author H. Y. \ Hwang ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.12971 journal journal arXiv:2201.12971 \ ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    author author L. E. \ Chow , author S. K. \ Sudheesh , author Z. Y. \ Luo , author P. Nandi , author T. Heil , author J. Deuschle , author S. W. \ Zeng , author Z. T. \ Zhang , author S. Prakash , author X. M. \ Du , author Z. S. \ Lim , author P. A. \ van Aken , author E. E. ...

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    author author L. E. \ Chow , author K. Y. \ Yip , author M. Pierre , author S. W. \ Zeng , author Z. T. \ Zhang , author T. Heil , author J. Deuschle , author P. Nandi , author S. K. \ Sudheesh , author Z. S. \ Lim , author Z. Y. \ Luo , author M. Nardone , author A. Zitouni ,...

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    author author B. Y. \ Wang , author T. C. \ Wang , author Y.-T. \ Hsu , author M. Osada , author K. Lee , author C. Jia , author C. Duffy , author D. Li , author J. Fowlie , author M. R. \ Beasley , author T. P. \ Devereaux , author I. R. \ Fisher , author N. E. \ Hussey , \ a...

    doi

  24. [32]

    author author B. Y. \ Wang , author D. Li , author B. H. \ Goodge , author K. Lee , author M. Osada , author S. P. \ Harvey , author L. F. \ Kourkoutis , author M. R. \ Beasley , \ and\ author H. Y. \ Hwang ,\ 10.1038/s41567-020-01128-5 journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 17 ,...

    doi

  25. [33]

    Rossi , author H

    author author M. Rossi , author H. Lu , author K. Lee , author B. H. \ Goodge , author J. Choi , author M. Osada , author Y. Lee , author D. Li , author B. Y. \ Wang , author D. Jost , author S. Agrestini , author M. Garcia-Fernandez , author Z. X. \ Shen , author K.-J. \ Zhou...

    doi

  26. [34]

    Been , author W.-S

    author author E. Been , author W.-S. \ Lee , author H. Y. \ Hwang , author Y. Cui , author J. Zaanen , author T. Devereaux , author B. Moritz , \ and\ author C. Jia ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011050 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 11 ,\ pages 011050 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  27. [35]

    Zhang , author J

    author author Y. Zhang , author J. Zhang , author X. He , author J. Wang , \ and\ author P. Ghosez ,\ 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad108 journal journal PNAS Nexus \ volume 2 ,\ pages pgad108 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    author author S. L. E. \ Chow , author Z. Luo , \ and\ author A. Ariando ,\ 10.1038/s41586-025-08893-4 journal journal Nature \ volume 642 ,\ pages 58 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    Yang , author H

    author author M. Yang , author H. Wang , author J. Tang , author J. Luo , author X. Wu , author R. Mao , author W. Xu , author G. Zhou , author Z. Dong , author B. Feng , author L. Shi , author Z. Pei , author P. Gao , author Z. Chen , \ and\ author D. Li ,\ https://arxiv.org/...

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    author author N. N. \ Wang , author M. W. \ Yang , author Z. Yang , author K. Y. \ Chen , author H. Zhang , author Q. H. \ Zhang , author Z. H. \ Zhu , author Y. Uwatoko , author L. Gu , author X. L. \ Dong , author J. P. \ Sun , author K. J. \ Jin , \ and\ author J.-G. \ Chen...

    doi

  31. [39]

    Ren , author J

    author author X. Ren , author J. Li , author W.-C. \ Chen , author Q. Gao , author J. J. \ Sanchez , author J. Hales , author H. Luo , author F. Rodolakis , author J. L. \ McChesney , author T. Xiang , author J. Hu , author R. Comin , author Y. Wang , author X. Zhou , \ and\ a...

    doi

  32. [40]

    Lee , author X

    author author Y. Lee , author X. Wei , author Y. Yu , author L. Bhatt , author K. Lee , author B. H. \ Goodge , author S. P. \ Harvey , author B. Y. \ Wang , author D. A. \ Muller , author L. F. \ Kourkoutis , author W.-S. \ Lee , author S. Raghu , \ and\ author H. Y. \ Hwang ...

    doi

  33. [41]

    Worm , author Q

    author author P. Worm , author Q. Wang , author M. Kitatani , author I. Bia o , author Q. Gao , author X. Ren , author J. Choi , author D. Csontosov\'a , author K.-J. \ Zhou , author X. Zhou , author Z. Zhu , author L. Si , author J. Chang , author J. M. \ Tomczak , \ and\ aut...

    doi

  34. [42]

    author author V. M. \ Katukuri , author N. A. \ Bogdanov , author O. Weser , author J. van den Brink , \ and\ author A. Alavi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.241112 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 102 ,\ pages 241112 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  35. [43]

    Sakakibara , author H

    author author H. Sakakibara , author H. Usui , author K. Suzuki , author T. Kotani , author H. Aoki , \ and\ author K. Kuroki ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.077003 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 125 ,\ pages 077003 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  36. [44]

    Wu , author D

    author author X. Wu , author D. Di Sante , author T. Schwemmer , author W. Hanke , author H. Y. \ Hwang , author S. Raghu , \ and\ author R. Thomale ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.060504 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 101 ,\ pages 060504 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  37. [45]

    Lane , author R

    author author C. Lane , author R. Zhang , author B. Barbiellini , author R. S. \ Markiewicz , author A. Bansil , author J. Sun , \ and\ author J.-X. \ Zhu ,\ 10.1038/s42005-023-01213-0 journal journal Commun. Phys. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 90 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  38. [46]

    Qin \ and\ author Y.-f

    author author Q. Qin \ and\ author Y.-f. \ Yang ,\ 10.1038/s41535-025-00733-y journal journal npj Quantum Mater. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 13 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  39. [47]

    Rossi , author H

    author author M. Rossi , author H. Lu , author A. Nag , author D. Li , author M. Osada , author K. Lee , author B. Y. \ Wang , author S. Agrestini , author M. Garcia-Fernandez , author J. J. \ Kas , author Y.-D. \ Chuang , author Z. X. \ Shen , author H. Y. \ Hwang , author B....

    doi

  40. [48]

    Gao , author S

    author author Q. Gao , author S. Fan , author Q. Wang , author J. Li , author X. Ren , author I. Biało , author A. Drewanowski , author P. Rothenb\" u hler , author J. Choi , author R. Sutarto , author Y. Wang , author T. Xiang , author J. Hu , author K.-J. \ Zhou , author V. ...

    doi

  41. [49]

    Wang , author S

    author author Q. Wang , author S. Mustafi , author E. Fogh , author N. Astrakhantsev , author Z. He , author I. Biało , author Y. Chan , author L. Martinelli , author M. Horio , author O. Ivashko , author N. E. \ Shaik , author K. v. \ Arx , author Y. Sassa , author E. Paris ,...

    doi

  42. [50]

    Biało , author L

    author author I. Biało , author L. Martinelli , author G. De Luca , author P. Worm , author A. Drewanowski , author S. J\" o hr , author J. Choi , author M. Garcia-Fernandez , author S. Agrestini , author K.-J. \ Zhou , author K. Kummer , author N. B. \ Brookes , author L. Guo...

    doi

  43. [51]

    Meyers , author H

    author author D. Meyers , author H. Miao , author A. C. \ Walters , author V. Bisogni , author R. S. \ Springell , author M. d'Astuto , author M. Dantz , author J. Pelliciari , author H. Y. \ Huang , author J. Okamoto , author D. J. \ Huang , author J. P. \ Hill , author X. He...

    doi

  44. [52]

    Raji , author Z

    author author A. Raji , author Z. Dong , author V. Porée , author A. Subedi , author X. Li , author B. Mundet , author L. Varbaro , author C. Domínguez , author M. Hadjimichael , author B. Feng , author A. Nicolaou , author J.-P. \ Rueff , author D. Li , \ and\ author A. Glote...

    doi

  45. [53]

    Monney , author T

    author author C. Monney , author T. Schmitt , author C. E. \ Matt , author J. Mesot , author V. N. \ Strocov , author O. J. \ Lipscombe , author S. M. \ Hayden , \ and\ author J. Chang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.075103 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 075103 ( yea...

    doi

  46. [54]

    Le Tacon , author M

    author author M. Le Tacon , author M. Minola , author D. C. \ Peets , author M. Moretti Sala , author S. Blanco-Canosa , author V. Hinkov , author R. Liang , author D. A. \ Bonn , author W. N. \ Hardy , author C. T. \ Lin , author T. Schmitt , author L. Braicovich , author G. ...

    doi

  47. [55]

    Subedi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.024801 journal journal Phys

    author author A. Subedi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.024801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Mater. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 024801 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  48. [56]

    Wang , author G

    author author L. Wang , author G. He , author Z. Yang , author M. Garcia-Fernandez , author A. Nag , author K. Zhou , author M. Minola , author M. L. \ Tacon , author B. Keimer , author Y. Peng , \ and\ author Y. Li ,\ 10.1038/s41467-022-30918-z journal journal Nat. Commun. \ ...

    doi

  49. [57]

    Ivashko , author M

    author author O. Ivashko , author M. Horio , author W. Wan , author N. B. \ Christensen , author D. E. \ McNally , author E. Paris , author Y. Tseng , author N. E. \ Shaik , author H. M. \ Rønnow , author H. I. \ Wei , author C. Adamo , author C. Lichtensteiger , author M. Gib...

    doi

  50. [58]

    \ Zhang , author Y.-f

    author author G.-M. \ Zhang , author Y.-f. \ Yang , \ and\ author F.-C. \ Zhang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.020501 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 101 ,\ pages 020501 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  51. [59]

    Wang , author G.-M

    author author Z. Wang , author G.-M. \ Zhang , author Y.-f. \ Yang , \ and\ author F.-C. \ Zhang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.220501 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 102 ,\ pages 220501 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  52. [60]

    Singh , author H

    author author A. Singh , author H. Y. \ Huang , author Y. Y. \ Chu , author C. Y. \ Hua , author S. W. \ Lin , author H. S. \ Fung , author H. W. \ Shiu , author J. Chang , author J. H. \ Li , author J. Okamoto , author C. C. \ Chiu , author C. H. \ Chang , author W. B. \ Wu ,...

    doi

  53. [61]

    \ Zhou , author A

    author author K.-J. \ Zhou , author A. Walters , author M. Garcia-Fernandez , author T. Rice , author M. Hand , author A. Nag , author J. Li , author S. Agrestini , author P. Garland , author H. Wang , author S. Alcock , author I. Nistea , author B. Nutter , author N. Rubies ,...

    doi

  54. [62]

    Osada , author B

    author author M. Osada , author B. Y. \ Wang , author K. Lee , author D. Li , \ and\ author H. Y. \ Hwang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.121801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Mater. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 121801 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  55. [63]

    Ghiringhelli , author M

    author author G. Ghiringhelli , author M. L. \ Tacon , author M. Minola , author S. Blanco-Canosa , author C. Mazzoli , author N. B. \ Brookes , author G. M. D. \ Luca , author A. Frano , author D. G. \ Hawthorn , author F. He , author T. Loew , author M. M. \ Sala , author D....

    2012

  56. [64]

    author author J. Q. \ Lin , author H. Miao , author D. G. \ Mazzone , author G. D. \ Gu , author A. Nag , author A. C. \ Walters , author M. García-Fernández , author A. Barbour , author J. Pelliciari , author I. Jarrige , author M. Oda , author K. Kurosawa , author N. Momono ...

    doi

  57. [65]

    Wang , author K

    author author Q. Wang , author K. von Arx , author M. Horio , author D. J. \ Mukkattukavil , author J. K \"u spert , author Y. Sassa , author T. Schmitt , author A. Nag , author S. Pyon , author T. Takayama , author H. Takagi , author M. Garcia-Fernandez , author K.-J. \ Zhou ...

    doi

  58. [66]

    Arpaia , author L

    author author R. Arpaia , author L. Martinelli , author M. M. \ Sala , author S. Caprara , author A. Nag , author N. B. \ Brookes , author P. Camisa , author Q. Li , author Q. Gao , author X. Zhou , author M. Garcia-Fernandez , author K.-J. \ Zhou , author E. Schierle , author...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.