Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Invisible Accretion: Ionized Envelopes of TNG50 HVCs can Sustain Star Formation

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In simulations of Milky Way-like galaxies, the warm and hot ionized envelopes around high-velocity clouds carry enough inflowing gas to sustain about 81% of star formation, while neutral clouds supply only 11%.

desk verdict Qualitatively sound population study of ionized HVC envelopes, but the headline 81% needs firmer envelope definitions and internal number fixes before it can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18687 v1 pith:YOQ3Z263 submitted 2025-07-24 astro-ph.GA

Scott Lucchini , Jiwon Jesse Han , Lars Hernquist , Charlie Conroy , Andrew J. Fox This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords high-velocitycloudscircumgalacticmediumionizedgasTNG50IllustrisTNGaccretionstarformationMilkyWayanalogs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the ionized gas surrounding high-velocity clouds (HVCs) is the main carrier of gas accretion onto Milky Way-like galaxies, not the neutral gas seen in 21-cm emission. Using 47 galaxies from the TNG50 simulation, it finds that the ionized envelopes contain about 5.6 times more mass than the neutral clouds, and that their infall rate can balance 81% of a galaxy's star formation rate, while neutral HVCs supply only 11%. The authors conclude that the diffuse, ionized circumgalactic medium is what actually sustains star formation at low redshift. The result matters because it reframes the dominant fuel source for galaxy growth as the 'invisible' ionized component rather than the easily observed neutral component.

What carries the argument

The central tool is a velocity-alignment criterion. For each gas cell, the normalized velocity difference dvi = |v_i - v_HVC|/|v_HVC| measures whether the cell is comoving with the HVC. An alignment fraction f(r) is fit with a cored exponential profile to define a 'half-size' radius where f = 0.5, and the ionized envelope is taken as gas with temperature above $10^{4}$.5 K, weighted by max(0, 1 - dvi), within twice the half-size. Accretion rates sum cell masses times the radial velocity divided by radius, with the ionized calculation using alignment weights to avoid double counting. This machinery lets the paper move from neutral H I emission analogs to the otherwise invisible ionized gas in three dimensions.

What would settle it

Trace the identified ionized envelopes forward in a simulation that resolves radiative cooling, turbulent mixing, and thermal conduction. If fewer than roughly half of the envelope cells reach the star-forming disk as cold gas, the claim that ionized HVCs can sustain 81% of the star formation rate fails. Observationally, a robust census of ionized HVC distances and inflow velocities in the Milky Way yielding a total ionized inflow well below the Galactic star formation rate would also contradict it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In TNG50 Milky Way-like galaxies, every neutral HVC is surrounded by a much more massive warm and hot ionized envelope that is comoving with it, and this envelope, not the neutral cloud, dominates the accreted mass. Across 47 galaxies, the ionized infall rate scales with the star formation rate with slope 0.94, and the distribution of ionized accretion divided by star formation rate peaks at 81%, versus 11% for neutral HVCs. The paper claims that the ionized high-velocity circumgalactic medium can sustain the observed star formation, provided the material can cool and condense into star-forming gas.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the ionized envelope gas, once it falls inward, can actually cool and condense into star-forming material; the paper measures inflow rates but does not simulate whether the clouds survive, cool, or mix before reaching the disk.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ionized envelopes are about six times more massive than neutral HVCs and are prolate in 73% of cases, linking them to filamentary infall rather than spherical accretion.
  • Mock absorption spectra through simulated sightlines show multiphase gas at HVC velocities, so HVCs should be detectable in ultraviolet ions such as C IV, Si III, and O VI even when H I emission is too faint.
  • Neutral HVC accretion alone accounts for roughly 11% of the star formation rate, implying that H I surveys substantially underestimate the mass accreting onto galaxies.
  • The linear scaling of ionized accretion rate with star formation rate indicates that low-redshift galaxy growth is tightly connected to diffuse circumgalactic medium inflow.
  • Combining neutral and ionized HVC accretion gives a total that peaks at 93% of the star formation rate, nearly closing the fuel budget for star formation.
  • The ionized envelopes are generally hotter than the ambient circumgalactic medium, suggesting that their high anomalous velocities generate shear heating.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 81% result holds, then the rate at which ionized envelope gas cools and condenses is the true bottleneck for star formation, so simulations resolving turbulent mixing layers should show envelope gas converting to neutral and molecular phases within a dynamical time.
  • The velocity-alignment technique could be applied to other multiphase circumgalactic structures, such as satellite streams and thermally unstable gas, to test whether similar ionized envelopes are a universal feature of accreting gas.
  • A testable extension is the prediction that envelope size decreases with galactocentric radius because of increasing shear and pressure; higher-resolution circumgalactic simulations or deep H I plus ultraviolet observations could check this trend.
  • Because the paper excludes Magellanic-Stream-like interactions, including such major satellite interactions would likely raise the ionized inflow budget further, potentially overshooting the star formation rate balance and indicating that some ionized gas must be ejected or fail to condense.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper identifies high-velocity cloud (HVC) analogs in TNG50, defines ionized envelopes around them using velocity alignment (dvi) and temperature thresholds, and computes neutral and ionized masses and accretion rates for one fiducial galaxy and a population of ~47 Milky Way-like galaxies. The central claims are that the ionized envelopes contain ~5.6 times more mass than the neutral HVCs, that the ionized accretion rate can balance ~81% of the galactic star formation rate (with neutral HVCs balancing only ~11%), and that these rates scale with SFR and with each other. The paper also presents mock absorption spectra and covering fractions for comparison with observations, and characterizes the envelopes as mostly prolate.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, the paper provides a direct simulation-based argument that ionized CGM gas comoving with HVCs is the dominant accretion reservoir in Milky Way-like galaxies at z=0, strengthening and extending observational estimates such as those of Fox et al. (2019). Strengths include the direct use of simulation cells rather than fitted models, a population of dozens of MW-like galaxies, mock spectra generated with Trident for observational comparison, and explicit caveats about cooling, condensation, and resolution. The main risk is that the headline numbers (5.6x mass ratio, 81% SFR fraction, 6.8 vs 1.3 Msun/yr) depend on the definition of the ionized envelope, and the paper itself notes that the dvi<=0.5 criterion can select ambient CGM gas by chance. Because the accretion-rate estimator does not apply the same step-down decontamination used for the 3D morphological envelopes, the quantitative results require a robustness check before the central claim is fully established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.2] The accretion rates that feed the headline numbers are computed from the half-size radial envelopes using dvi<=0.5, without the step-down procedure that the same section applies to the 3D Voronoi envelopes. The text explicitly states that dvi<=0.5 can produce "unrealistically large ionized envelopes due to random alignment of ambient CGM gas cells", yet the step-down (decreasing dvi by 0.05 until fewer than 2,000 cells) is applied only to the connected 3D envelopes used for morphology, not to the mass and accretion-rate sums that underlie Figure 7 and the 81% and 5.6x numbers. Section 4's validation of the half-size method against the 3D envelopes covers masses only, only in the fiducial galaxy, and reports that 20% of HVCs disagree by more than 15%; it does not compare accretion rates. Please quantify the ambient-CGM contamination by recomputing Mdot_ion with the stepped-down 3D envelopes (or by subtracting a baseline alignment fraction for ambient gas) and report how the 81% peak, the 5.6x mass ratio, and the Figure 7 scalings change with that choice.
  2. [Title and Abstract] The title "Invisible Accretion: Ionized Envelopes of TNG50 HVCs can Sustain Star Formation" and the concluding sentence assert a causal capacity, while the analysis does not model cooling, condensation, cloud survival, or mixing; the paper explicitly postpones the fate of these HVC analogs to future work. The abstract's parenthetical caveat about sufficient cooling and condensation is appropriate, but the title overstates the result. Please soften the title or add a sentence in the abstract and conclusions clarifying that the 81% figure is an upper-bound-style accretion-rate comparison, not a demonstrated star-formation pathway.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.3] The abstract states that the study covers 47 Milky Way-like galaxies, but Section 3.3 gives 52 total galaxies minus 6 excluded major mergers, yielding 46 galaxies, and the text says "In these 46 galaxies". Please reconcile this discrepancy.
  2. [Section 3.3 and Figure 7] The text near the left panel of Figure 7 writes the fit as Mdot_neut = 3.16 x Mdot_ion + 2.02, which contradicts the figure's equation Mdot_ion = 3.16 x Mdot_neut + 2.02 and the surrounding claim that ionized accretion is about three times the neutral rate. The text should be corrected to match the figure.
  3. [Section 2.2] Equation (3) has four free parameters (fmax, rc, alpha, tau), and the half-size is derived from the fit, but the paper does not report uncertainties on the fitted half-sizes or a sensitivity test of the alignment-fraction fit. A brief statement of the fitting uncertainties and their effect on the derived envelope masses would strengthen the robustness discussion.
  4. [Section 4] The sentence "The HVC envelopes are infalling (by selection)" is imprecise, because the envelope selection is based on velocity alignment rather than on radial infall; the accretion-rate calculation later restricts to infalling material. Please clarify whether the morphology statistics use all envelopes or only those of infalling HVCs.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the accretion rates and mass ratios are direct simulation measurements, not fitted to or defined by the SFR.

full rationale

The paper's central quantities—ionized envelope masses, M_ion, and M_neut—are computed directly from TNG50 gas cells using the explicitly defined velocity-alignment factor dvi, the cored exponential fit for the half-size (Equation 3), and the weighted sums in Section 2.2. The reported 81% SFR-balance value is the peak of the galaxy-by-galaxy distribution of M_ion/SFR (Figure 7, right panel), not a parameter fitted to match the SFR; the linear fits in Figure 7 are summaries of emergent correlations, and the SUBFIND SFR is an independent simulation output used only for comparison. The HVC analog sample and identification method are imported from the authors' Paper I, but that citation supplies a selection definition (cold, high-deviation clouds), not a result equivalent to the present claim, and applying that selection to 47 galaxies is an independent measurement. The comparison to Fox et al. (2019) is an external observational benchmark, and the deferred cooling/condensation analysis and momentum-alignment threshold caveats are physical and robustness limitations, not definitional circularity. No equation or fitted parameter reduces by construction to the claimed prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis introduces no new physical entities. It depends on the fidelity of the TNG50 simulation, on a kinematic definition of ionized envelopes that involves hand-tuned thresholds (dvi cutoff, max cell count), and on an unmodeled cooling/condensation step to connect infall to star formation.

free parameters (4)
  • alignment threshold dvi_cutoff = 0.5 initially, stepped down by 0.05 until envelope has <2000 cells
    Defines which ionized gas cells are comoving with the HVC and included in the envelope. The step-down procedure is a hand-tuned fix for 'random alignment of ambient CGM gas' (Section 2.2), and directly controls envelope mass and accretion rate.
  • max envelope size = 2000 cells (1000 and 3000 also tested)
    Cells in the connected comoving envelope are capped at 2000 cells; the authors chose this value as providing 'the best agreement with the half-size calculations' (Section 2.2).
  • HVC velocity deviation threshold = 70 km/s
    Cold clouds are classified as HVC analogs if their velocity deviates by more than 70 km/s from galactic rotation, defined in Paper I and reused here (Section 2, Paper I Sections 2.2/2.4).
  • ionized gas temperature threshold = T > 10^4.5 K
    Envelope gas is defined as ionized with T > 10^4.5 K (Section 2.2). This is a standard phase cut but changes mass and accretion estimates.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption TNG50 realistically captures the multiphase CGM and HVC population of Milky Way-like galaxies.
    The entire analysis rests on the fidelity of the TNG50 simulation at z=0; the paper acknowledges resolution limits in the CGM and cites convergence studies for global properties, but states that small-scale mixing layers and cold structures are not resolved (Section 2.3).
  • domain assumption Ionized cells kinematically aligned with a cold HVC analog are physically associated with that cloud, not with ambient CGM gas.
    The envelope definition assumes dvi <= 0.5 marks true comoving material; the paper explicitly notes that ambient gas can randomly align and produces unrealistically large envelopes, which is why the cutoff is manually reduced (Section 2.2).
  • domain assumption The ionized envelope material can cool and condense to form stars.
    The 'can sustain star formation' claim requires this step; the paper does not model it and defers cloud-fate analysis to future work (abstract; Section 4).
  • domain assumption Trident's cloudy-based ionization tables and the Haardt & Madau (2012) UV background correctly compute ionic species in TNG50 gas.
    The mock spectra and Si-based mass flow rates rely on Trident/yt and precomputed cloudy tables (Section 2.1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Invisible Accretion: Ionized Envelopes of TNG50 HVCs can Sustain Star Formation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YOQ3Z263

@misc{pith2026250718687,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Invisible Accretion: Ionized Envelopes of TNG50 HVCs can Sustain Star Formation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YOQ3Z263}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18687}
}
abstract

Galactic high-velocity clouds (HVCs) are known to be complex, multiphase systems consisting of neutral and/or ionized gas moving at high velocities relative to the rotation of the disk. In this work, we investigate Milky Way-like galaxies from the TNG50 simulation to characterize the properties, morphology, and accretion rates of the warm and hot ionized material comoving with neutral HVCs visible in HI. We find that the ionized gas forms an envelope around the neutral material, and in most cases (73% of the HVCs) it is prolate in morphology. We also find that the ionized mass is ~6 times greater than the neutral mass, which leads to significantly more accretion possible from the ionized gas ($\dot{M}_\mathrm{ion}$) than the neutral gas ($\dot{M}_\mathrm{neut}$), consistent with estimates made from observations of our own Galaxy. We investigate the accretion rates from both phases of HVCs around 47 Milky Way-like galaxies and find that $\dot{M}_\mathrm{ion}$ scales with $\dot{M}_\mathrm{neut}$, and both scale with the star formation rate of the galaxy. Finally, we find that, on average, $\dot{M}_\mathrm{ion}$ could account for 81% of the galactic star formation rate (assuming the material can sufficiently cool and condense), while $\dot{M}_\mathrm{neut}$ can only balance 11%. Thus, the diffuse, ionized, high-velocity circumgalactic medium plays a defining role in the evolution and growth of galaxies at low redshift.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18687 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The fraction of hot (T > 104.5 K) gas cells within a given spherical shell around an HVC that have velocities aligned with the mean HVC velocity. The top panels show the alignment fractions for four HVCs as measured in the simulation in blue. The black lines are fits using a cored exponential profile (see Equation 3). The green lines denote the half-size for these clouds−the radius at which the fraction of gas cells… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mock observations of our simulated galaxy. The background image is an all-sky projection from a solar-like position of H I emission colored by LSR velocity (with brightness denoting column density). The overlaid plots are synthetic spectra towards three of our identified HVC analogs. Each subpanel shows the absorption profile of a different transition as a function of LSR velocity (absorption from the disk at 0 km s… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Cartesian view of the galaxy and its HVCs. The central panel shows the gas density in grey in the background with nine 3D HVCs overlaid in blue and red, showing the cool and warm/hot gas, respectively. These 3D structures are generated by reconstructing the Voronoi mesh and isolating the connected comoving cells (as described in Section 2.2). Each of the surrounding four panels shows one of the HVCs from an alternat… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distributions of calculated half-sizes separated by HVC origin as determined in Paper I. We see that the disk origin HVCs tend to have smaller half-sizes, while the stripped satellite material and thermal instability clouds tend to coexist with larger ionized envelopes…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The total ionized mass vs. neutral mass for each HVC analog in our galaxy. The grey background shows the distribution for all clouds, while the colored dots and con￾tours show the populations separated by origin as determined in Paper I. The lines mark where the ionize…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Accretion rate values for the population of MW-like galaxies from Semenov et al. (2024). Left: The calculated accretion rate of the ionized HVC material vs. the neutral HVC gas. Each point represents the summed total accretion for all HVCs within a single galaxy. A lin…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gas accretion onto the Milky Way: high-velocity cloud survival and the revival of the terminal-velocity paradigm

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Terminal velocity is a local, conditional equilibrium for Milky Way high-velocity clouds: dense clouds fall quasi-ballistically, adiabatic clouds break up, and radiative cooling can restore terminal-like motion.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S., et al

    Augustin, R., Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.06551, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.06551

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.06551 2025

  2. [2]

    2010, ApJ, 717, 323, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/323

    Bauermeister, A., Blitz, L., & Ma, C.-P. 2010, ApJ, 717, 323, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/323

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/717/1/323 2010

  3. [3]

    Benjamin, R. A. 2004, in Astrophysics and Space Science

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    Woerden, B. P. Wakker, U. J. Schwarz, & K. S. de Boer, 371, doi: 10.1007/1-4020-2579-3 17

    doi:10.1007/1-4020-2579-3

  5. [5]

    1977, ApJ, 215, 483, doi: 10.1086/155378

    Binney, J. 1977, ApJ, 215, 483, doi: 10.1086/155378

    doi:10.1086/155378 1977

  6. [6]

    Madsen, G. J. 2013, ApJ, 778, 58, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/58

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/778/1/58 2013

  7. [7]

    2007, ApJL, 670, L109, doi: 10.1086/524657

    Bland-Hawthorn, J., Sutherland, R., Agertz, O., & Moore, B. 2007, ApJL, 670, L109, doi: 10.1086/524657

    work page doi:10.1086/524657 2007

  8. [8]

    J., Balbus, S

    Borkowski, K. J., Balbus, S. A., & Fristrom, C. C. 1990, ApJ, 355, 501, doi: 10.1086/168784

    doi:10.1086/168784 1990

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    A., & Oegerle, W

    Chevalier, R. A., & Oegerle, W. R. 1979, ApJ, 227, 398, doi: 10.1086/156744

    1979 doi

  2. [10]

    Chomiuk, L., & Povich, M. S. 2011, AJ, 142, 197, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/6/197

    2011 doi

  3. [11]

    Clark, S., Bordoloi, R., & Fox, A. J. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 811, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac504

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    E., & Hensley, B

    Clark, S. E., & Hensley, B. S. 2019, ApJ, 887, 136, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5803

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    A., Shull, J

    Collins, J. A., Shull, J. M., & Giroux, M. L. 2007, ApJ, 657, 271, doi: 10.1086/510770 —. 2009, ApJ, 705, 962, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/962 D’Onghia, E., & Fox, A. J. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 363, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023251 Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., Lidz, A., Zaldarr...

    2007 doi

  6. [14]

    2009, ApJ, 703, 1416, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/1416

    Hernquist, L. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1416, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/1416

    2009 doi

  7. [15]

    B., Ostriker, E

    Fielding, D. B., Ostriker, E. C., Bryan, G. L., & Jermyn, A. S. 2020, ApJL, 894, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8d2c

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    J., Cashman, F

    Fox, A. J., Cashman, F. H., Kriss, G. A., et al. 2023, ApJL, 946, L48, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc640

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    J., Richter, P., Ashley, T., et al

    Fox, A. J., Richter, P., Ashley, T., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab40ad

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    J., Savage, B

    Fox, A. J., Savage, B. D., & Wakker, B. P. 2006, ApJS, 165, 229, doi: 10.1086/504800

    2006 doi

  11. [19]

    J., Wakker, B

    Fox, A. J., Wakker, B. P., Barger, K. A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 787, 147, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/787/2/147

    2014 doi

  12. [20]

    M., Fox, A

    French, D. M., Fox, A. J., Wakker, B. P., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1b9f

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    K., Giroux, M

    Gibson, B. K., Giroux, M. L., Penton, S. V., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1830, doi: 10.1086/301545

    2000 doi

  14. [22]

    Gnat, O., Sternberg, A., & McKee, C. F. 2010, ApJ, 718, 1315, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/1315

    2010 doi

  15. [23]

    Gronke, M., & Oh, S. P. 2018, MNRAS, 480, L111, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly131 —. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 1970, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3332

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    P., Ji, S., & Norman, C

    Gronke, M., Oh, S. P., Ji, S., & Norman, C. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 859, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3351

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    2012, ApJ, 746, 125, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/125 HI4PI Collaboration, Ben Bekhti, N., Fl¨ oer, L., et al

    Haardt, F., & Madau, P. 2012, ApJ, 746, 125, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/125 HI4PI Collaboration, Ben Bekhti, N., Fl¨ oer, L., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629178

    2012 doi

  18. [26]

    B., Smith, B

    Hummels, C. B., Smith, B. D., & Silvia, D. W. 2017, ApJ, 847, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7e2d

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    B., Smith, B

    Hummels, C. B., Smith, B. D., Hopkins, P. F., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab378f

    2019 doi

  20. [28]

    Kalberla, P. M. W., Burton, W. B., Hartmann, D., et al. 2005, A&A, 440, 775, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041864

    2005 doi

  21. [29]

    P., & Mandelker, N

    Kaul, I., Tan, B., Oh, S. P., & Mandelker, N. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.17549, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.17549

    2025 doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    Kwak, K., & Shelton, R. L. 2010, ApJ, 719, 523, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/523

    2010 doi

  23. [31]

    Lehner, N., & Howk, J. C. 2011, Science, 334, 955, doi: 10.1126/science.1209069

    2011 doi

  24. [32]

    C., Marasco, A., & Fraternali, F

    Lehner, N., Howk, J. C., Marasco, A., & Fraternali, F. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 3228, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac987

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    C., Thom, C., et al

    Lehner, N., Howk, J. C., Thom, C., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 2896, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21428.x

    2012

  26. [34]

    F., Squire, J., & Hummels, C

    Li, Z., Hopkins, P. F., Squire, J., & Hummels, C. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 1841, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3567

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    C., & Newman, J

    Licquia, T. C., & Newman, J. A. 2015, ApJ, 806, 96, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/96

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    S., et al

    Lochhaas, C., Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 948, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbb06

    2023 doi

  29. [37]

    D., Sembach, K

    Lu, L., Savage, B. D., Sembach, K. R., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 162, doi: 10.1086/300181 13

    1998 doi

  30. [38]

    2024, Ap&SS, 369, 114, doi: 10.1007/s10509-024-04377-5

    Lucchini, S. 2024, Ap&SS, 369, 114, doi: 10.1007/s10509-024-04377-5

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    J., et al

    Lucchini, S., D’Onghia, E., Fox, A. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 203, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2663-4

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    J., Hernquist, L., & Conroy, C

    Lucchini, S., Han, J. J., Hernquist, L., & Conroy, C. 2024, ApJ, 974, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6dde

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    J., Smoker, J

    Mishra, S., Fox, A. J., Smoker, J. V., Lucchini, S., & D’Onghia, E. 2025, ApJ, 984, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc68a

    2025 doi

  34. [42]

    A., Oort, J

    Muller, C. A., Oort, J. H., & Raimond, E. 1963, Academie des Sciences Paris Comptes Rendus, 257, 1661

    1963

  35. [43]

    2000, ApJL, 529, L81, doi: 10.1086/312462

    Murali, C. 2000, ApJL, 529, L81, doi: 10.1086/312462

    2000 doi

  36. [44]

    M., Lockman, F

    Murphy, E. M., Lockman, F. J., & Savage, B. D. 1995, ApJ, 447, 642, doi: 10.1086/175906

    1995 doi

  37. [45]

    2019a, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 6, 2, doi: 10.1186/s40668-019-0028-x

    Nelson, D., Springel, V., Pillepich, A., et al. 2019a, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 6, 2, doi: 10.1186/s40668-019-0028-x

    doi

  38. [46]

    2019b, MNRAS, 490, 3234, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2306

    Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Springel, V., et al. 2019b, MNRAS, 490, 3234, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2306

    doi

  39. [47]

    S., Corlies, L., Tumlinson, J., et al

    Peeples, M. S., Corlies, L., Tumlinson, J., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0654 P´ eroux, C., & Howk, J. C. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 363, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-021820-120014

    2019 doi

  40. [48]

    2019, MNRAS, 490, 3196, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2338

    Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Springel, V., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3196, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2338

    2019 doi

  41. [49]

    2024, MNRAS, 535, 1721, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2165

    Pillepich, A., Sotillo-Ramos, D., Ramesh, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 1721, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2165

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    E., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Veilleux, S., et al

    Putman, M. E., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Veilleux, S., et al. 2003, ApJ, 597, 948, doi: 10.1086/378555

    2003 doi

  43. [51]

    E., Peek, J

    Putman, M. E., Peek, J. E. G., & Joung, M. R. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 491, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125612

    2012 doi

  44. [52]

    2024, MNRAS, 528, 3320, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae237

    Ramesh, R., & Nelson, D. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 3320, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae237

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    2024, A&A, 684, L16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348786

    Ramesh, R., Nelson, D., Fielding, D., & Br¨ uggen, M. 2024, A&A, 684, L16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348786

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    C., Fangano, A

    Richter, P., Charlton, J. C., Fangano, A. P. M., Bekhti, N. B., & Masiero, J. R. 2009, ApJ, 695, 1631, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/695/2/1631

    2009 doi

  47. [55]

    S., Widmann, H., et al

    Richter, P., de Boer, K. S., Widmann, H., et al. 1999, Nature, 402, 386, doi: 10.1038/46492

    1999 doi

  48. [56]

    E., Fox, A

    Richter, P., Nuza, S. E., Fox, A. J., et al. 2017, A&A, 607, A48, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630081

    2017 doi

  49. [57]

    P., & Whitney, B

    Robitaille, T. P., & Whitney, B. A. 2010, ApJL, 710, L11, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/710/1/L11

    2010 doi

  50. [58]

    R., Wakker, B

    Sembach, K. R., Wakker, B. P., Savage, B. D., et al. 2003, ApJS, 146, 165, doi: 10.1086/346231

    2003 doi

  51. [59]

    2024, ApJ, 962, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad150a

    Nelson, D. 2024, ApJ, 962, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad150a

    2024 doi

  52. [60]

    M., Jones, J

    Shull, J. M., Jones, J. R., Danforth, C. W., & Collins, J. A. 2009, ApJ, 699, 754, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/754

    2009 doi

  53. [61]

    D., Shull, J

    Slavin, J. D., Shull, J. M., & Begelman, M. C. 1993, ApJ, 407, 83, doi: 10.1086/172494

    1993 doi

  54. [62]

    V., Fox, A

    Smoker, J. V., Fox, A. J., & Keenan, F. P. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 1105, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18647.x

    2011

  55. [63]

    1956, ApJ, 124, 20, doi: 10.1086/146200

    Spitzer, Lyman, J. 1956, ApJ, 124, 20, doi: 10.1086/146200

    1956 doi

  56. [64]

    2010, MNRAS, 401, 791, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x

    Springel, V. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 791, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x

    2010

  57. [65]

    R., Stanimirovi´ c, S., et al

    Steffes, L., Rybarczyk, D. R., Stanimirovi´ c, S., et al. 2024, PASA, 41, e094, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2024.95

    2024 doi

  58. [66]

    P., & Gronke, M

    Tan, B., Oh, S. P., & Gronke, M. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 3179, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab053 —. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 2571, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad236 Tepper-Garc ´ ıa, T., Bland-Hawthorn, J., & Sutherland, R. S. 2015, ApJ, 813, 94, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/94

    2021 doi

  59. [67]

    L., Reynolds, R

    Tufte, S. L., Reynolds, R. J., & Haffner, L. M. 1998, ApJ, 504, 773, doi: 10.1086/306103

    1998 doi

  60. [68]

    S., & Werk, J

    Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., & Werk, J. K. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 389, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055240

    2017 doi

  61. [69]

    J., Smith, B

    Turk, M. J., Smith, B. D., Oishi, J. S., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 9, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/9 van de Voort, F., Springel, V., Mandelker, N., van den

    2011 doi

  62. [70]

    C., & Pakmor, R

    Bosch, F. C., & Pakmor, R. 2019, MNRAS, 482, L85, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly190 van Woerden, H., Rougoor, G. W., & Oort, J. H. 1957, Academie des Sciences Paris Comptes Rendus, 244, 1691

    2019 doi

  63. [71]

    Wakker, B. P. 2001, ApJS, 136, 463, doi: 10.1086/321783

    2001 doi

  64. [72]

    P., & Mathis, J

    Wakker, B. P., & Mathis, J. S. 2000, ApJL, 544, L107, doi: 10.1086/317316

    2000 doi

  65. [73]

    P., & van Woerden, H

    Wakker, B. P., & van Woerden, H. 1997, ARA&A, 35, 217, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.217

    1997 doi

  66. [74]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, 289, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2757

    Westmeier, T. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 289, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2757

    2018 doi

  67. [75]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.09083, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.09083

    Yang, L., Katz, N., Scannapieco, E., & Br¨ uggen, M. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.09083, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.09083

    2025 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.