Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Scattering of Antiplane Shear Waves by Fractals in Strain Gradient Elasticity

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that in strain gradient elasticity, the fractal dimension of a Koch-snowflake pin layout, not the number of pins, controls resonant SH-wave trapping.

desk verdict Solid new Green's function and an intriguing trapping effect, but the fractal-dimension claim is not supported by the paper's own data. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18768 v1 pith:2EAHZIPW submitted 2025-07-24 physics.class-ph physics.comp-ph

E. Alevras , Th. Zisis , P.A. Gourgiotis This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.class-phphysics.comp-ph MSC 74J2074A35
keywords antiplaneshearwavesstraingradientelasticityKochsnowflakefractaldimensionwavetrappingGreen'sfunctionresonancerigidpins
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that the way antiplane shear waves scatter off an array of rigid pins is controlled by the fractal dimension of the pin layout, not by how many pins it contains. The vehicle is a Koch-snowflake arrangement of pins embedded in a solid governed by strain gradient elasticity, compared against circular arrays with the same pin counts. The authors derive a closed-form Green's function that stays finite at the pins, convert the scattering problem into a linear system, and identify resonant trapping modes as sharp higher-order minima of the determinant of the Green's matrix. They report that sharp trapped resonances appear only in the anomalous dispersion regime (microstructural length ratio $H<1$), and that the snowflake's response saturates after the third iteration even as the pin count quadruples. If correct, this gives a design rule: the geometry's dimension, not pin density, sets the resonant response.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the time-harmonic antiplane Green's function of strain gradient elasticity, $g(r;r') = [i\pi H_0^{(1)}(q_1 s) - 2K_0(q_2 s)]/[4\mu\pi\ell^2(q_1^2+q_2^2)]$, which remains finite at the source point $s=0$, unlike its classically singular counterpart. That finiteness lets the authors superpose $N_p$ unknown reaction amplitudes and solve $\mathbf{G}\mathbf{A} = -\mathbf{U}^{(\mathrm{in})}$ for the scattered field; resonances are then identified as sufficiently flat minima of $\Gamma = \log|\det\mathbf{G}|$ with respect to the dimensionless wavenumber $K_S = \ell\omega/V_S$. The geometric input is the effective box-counting dimension of the finite Koch iteration, $\dim_{\mathrm{box}}^{(n)} = 1/n + \ln 4/\ln 3$, which is used to quantify how the fractal boundary differs from the one-dimensional circle.

What would settle it

Measure the resonant spectrum of two pin clusters with the same effective box-counting dimension but different corner counts (for example, a Koch snowflake at one iteration and a different self-similar generator whose finite-iteration dimension matches), over the same $K_S$ window at $H=0$; if the sharp trapped modes appear in only one cluster, the controlling variable is something other than the dimension.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under antiplane shear in strain gradient elasticity, a small cluster of rigid pins shaped like a Koch snowflake can trap SH-wave motion inside itself at discrete wavenumbers, while a circular cluster with the same number of pins in the same wavenumber window cannot. The trapping shows up as sharp local minima of $|\det \mathbf{G}(K_S)|$ satisfying a higher-order flatness condition, and these sharp minima occur consistently when the dispersion is anomalous ($H<1$, i.e. micro-inertia weaker than the gradient stiffness length). The resonance positions stabilize and the displacement amplitude saturates beyond the third iteration, from which the paper concludes that it is the fractal dimension of the boundary, rather than the pin count, that dictates the response. The same framework yields time-averaged kinetic and strain energy densities that localize more strongly than the displacement field, because they involve squared first and second derivatives of the regularized Green's function.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation stands or falls on the assumption that the finite-iteration box-counting dimension of the Koch snowflake, and not corner density, segment length, perimeter, or reentrant corner concentration, is the physical quantity controlling the resonances.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Trapped modes exist only in the anomalous dispersion regime ($H<1$), so the microstructural length ratio is a material-level switch for wave trapping.
  • The resonance spectrum and displacement amplitudes stabilize by the third Koch iteration, meaning a few hundred pins suffice to reproduce the fractal's trapping behavior.
  • Circular layouts with 48, 192, or 768 pins show no sharp trapped resonances for $0<K_S<300$, so smooth convex arrays are not equivalent substitutes.
  • Because the Green's matrix criterion is configuration-independent, the same resonance-detection algorithm applies directly to any finite pin cluster in strain gradient elasticity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A stricter test than the snowflake-versus-circle comparison would vary the effective dimension while holding the generator and corner concentration fixed; the paper does not isolate dimension as a single variable.
  • The reported response sharpens as the computed dimension decreases from 2.26 to 1.51 across iterations, so the trend tracks iteration count and boundary complexity as much as the dimension itself; treating dimension as the control may be a proxy.
  • The multi-snowflake cavity result suggests a tiling route to tunable resonant cavities between fractal scatterers, an extension the paper does not develop.
  • The determinant criterion is geometry-agnostic, so the same $K_S$ scan could be applied to Sierpinski-type layouts or random fractal point sets to test whether the saturation behavior is generic for fractals.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies time-harmonic antiplane SH wave scattering by finite clusters of rigid pins in a Toupin–Mindlin strain-gradient elastic solid. It derives a closed-form Green's function for the antiplane problem, formulates the scattering problem as a linear system for fictitious pin forces, and identifies resonant wavenumbers from higher-order minima of |det(G)|. The main application is a Koch-snowflake pin layout compared with circular pin arrangements at equal pin counts. The authors report localized 'trapping' modes in the anomalous dispersion regime (H < 1) and claim that the response is dictated by the fractal dimension of the pin configuration rather than by the number of pins.

Significance. If the central claim were secured, the paper would be a useful contribution to wave trapping in microstructured solids: the Green's function is derived from first principles in Appendix A with no fitted parameters, it is finite at the source point, and the pin-collocation system is a straightforward and transparent formulation. The displacement-field plots in Figs. 5, 7, and 15 provide visual evidence that localized modes do occur. However, the paper's headline causal assertion about fractal dimension is not supported by its own data, and the comparisons presented do not isolate the dimension variable. The Green's function and the resonance-detection machinery are valuable independently of that assertion, but the interpretation needs substantial reworking or additional controlled computations.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.2, Eq. (B.6), Table 1] The abstract and Section 5.2 claim that the response is 'dictated by the fractal dimension rather than by the total number of pins', but the paper's own data show no monotone dimension-response correlation. The quantity defined in Eq. (B.6), dim_box(n) = 1/n + ln4/ln3, decreases monotonically from 2.26 (12 pins) to 1.51 (768 pins), while the reported resonant response sharpens and then saturates across iterations. Moreover, Eq. (B.6) is not a box-counting dimension of the finite polygonal pin set, which is topologically one-dimensional; it is a one-scale slope estimate at the chosen resolution, so its use as the causal variable is an interpretive step that the current comparisons cannot validate.
  2. [Section 5.2, Figs. 6-8] The Koch-snowflake versus circular comparison changes several geometric descriptors simultaneously: geometry type (self-similar with cusps versus smooth convex), boundary dimension, corner sharpness, number of reentrant corners, segment length, and pin spacing. The absence of sharp resonances for the circular arrangements with 48, 192, and 768 pins in 0 < KS < 300 therefore cannot be attributed specifically to the dimension variable. Controlled comparisons that vary one descriptor at a time, such as a polygonal approximation with the same reentrant corner count or a circle with comparable local pin spacing, are needed to isolate the claimed effect.
  3. [Section 4, Eq. (50)] The resonance detection criterion in Eq. (50) is asserted rather than validated. Because the system (47) is non-homogeneous, 'true resonance' is a heuristic notion, and the condition that the third derivative of Gamma vanishes while the fourth is negative needs to be shown to correlate robustly with displacement amplification. Figure 2 gives visual support for the distinction between trapping and propagating modes, but a quantitative validation against a known benchmark or a convergence study of the resonance search would strengthen the method.
  4. [Section 5.1, Fig. 4] The paper states that sharp local minima and trapping modes are 'consistently observed' for H < 1, but the evidence is limited to a small set of H values and configurations. The paper does not quantify how the sharpness of the minima or the displacement amplification varies with H, nor does it identify a threshold separating the trapping and delocalized regimes. A quantitative diagnostic such as a quality factor or an amplitude ratio would make the dispersion-regime claim testable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction and Fig. 5 caption] There are typographical errors: 'elasticty' in the Introduction and 'pined' in the Fig. 5 caption; the abstract also uses 'pined' once.
  2. [Section 2, Eqs. (32) and (12)] The notation for the microstructural lengths is inconsistent: Eq. (12) introduces l1 and l2, but Eq. (32) uses l without explicitly stating that l = l2 in the antiplane specialization; please make this explicit at the point of first use.
  3. [Appendix B, Eq. (B.6)] The term 'effective box-counting dimension' should be motivated more carefully; the expression is a one-scale logarithmic slope rather than the limit in Eq. (B.5), and the text should explain why this finite-iteration quantity is the physically relevant descriptor.
  4. [Section 5.2 and Table 1] The iteration numbering is confusing: Table 1 lists 12, 48, 192, and 768 pins, but the text variously calls these 'first to fourth iterations' and 'first to second iteration'; please state explicitly that N_p = 3*4^n and identify which n corresponds to each entry.
  5. [Section 4, Eq. (49) and Eq. (50)] The symbol Gamma is introduced in Eq. (49) as a logarithmic measure, but the text around Eq. (50) also uses Gamma as a generic displacement response variable in the discussion of Figure 2; unifying the notation would prevent confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the scattering and Green's-function derivation is self-contained, and the fractal-dimension interpretation is confounded but not circular.

full rationale

The central calculation chain is self-contained. The antiplane equation of motion (32) follows from Form II of Mindlin's theory; the Green's function (39) is derived in Appendix A by Fourier transforming the bi-Helmholtz equation (36) and using standard Bessel identities (A.10), with no parameter fitted to any scattering output. The scattering system (47) is the standard superposition of source amplitudes chosen to null the incident field at pin locations, and the determinant-minimum criterion (50) is a detection rule applied to the resulting Green's matrix, not a fit. The dispersion classification (normal/anomalous) follows from Eqs. (20)-(21) derived in the paper. The self-citations to [23], [40], [41], [46], [50], and [51] provide background or prior related Green's functions, but none carries the load: the dispersion relations and Green's function needed here are derived in Sections 2-3 and Appendix A. The possible weakness of the paper, namely that the conclusion that the response is 'dictated by the fractal dimension rather than by the total number of pins' is confounded because the finite-iteration dimension (B.6), perimeter, corner count, and pin spacing all change together along the Koch sequence, and the dimension decreases while the response sharpens and then saturates, is an interpretive and causal-inference issue rather than a circular one. No equation in the paper defines the response in terms of the dimension, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Accordingly, no circular step meets the evidentiary bar for the specific reduction patterns defined in the review criteria.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central computation rests on standard gradient elasticity theory, the point-pin multiple-scattering ansatz, and two paper-specific assumptions: the higher-order flatness resonance criterion (Eq. 50) and the effective finite-iteration box-counting dimension (Eq. B.6). The latter is especially fragile because the paper's own data show response sharpening then saturating as this dimension decreases. No genuinely new physical entities or fitted constants are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The elastic material obeys Form II of Mindlin's strain gradient elasticity with the constitutive and kinetic energy forms in Eqs. (1) and (5), introducing the length scales l and h.
    Invoked throughout as the governing framework, taken from Mindlin [22] and prior papers by the same group. This is a modeling choice, not a derived consequence.
  • standard math Antiplane shear reduces the displacement equations to the scalar bi-Helmholtz equation (32), with l = l2 while l1 does not appear.
    Standard reduction for SH waves in gradient elasticity; cited to [45] and derived in Section 2.
  • domain assumption Pins are modeled as point constraints with zero out-of-plane displacement, and the scattered field is a superposition of Green's functions with amplitudes solved from Eq. (47).
    This is the multiple-scattering ansatz introduced in Section 4. It requires that point constraints are physically realizable in gradient elasticity, which is supported by the finite Green's function but not proven experimentally.
  • ad hoc to paper True trapped resonances correspond to higher-order flat minima of |det(G)| where the first three derivatives of Gamma vanish appropriately, as stated in Eq. (50).
    This criterion is asserted in Section 4 without derivation or validation against an eigenvalue analysis of the homogeneous system. It is load-bearing for the identification of trapping modes.
  • domain assumption The strain energy density of the antiplane problem uses the simplification a3 = 0, equivalent to Poisson's ratio 1 in the thin-plate analogue, as stated in Section 5.5.
    Used for the energy densities in Figs. 14 and 15; the authors explicitly flag that this is a simplified theory. It does not affect the displacement-field results but does limit the energy localization conclusions.
  • ad hoc to paper The effective box-counting dimension of the finite-iteration snowflake, Eq. (B.6) with values in Table 1, is the geometric parameter that controls the resonance response.
    Introduced in Section 5.2 and Appendix B as the basis for the central 'fractal dimension dictates response' claim. This definition is unconventional because the dimension of any finite polygon is 1; the finite-iteration expression is not the true box-counting dimension of the constructed geometry. The causal role of this quantity is not established.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scattering of Antiplane Shear Waves by Fractals in Strain Gradient Elasticity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2EAHZIPW

@misc{pith2026250718768,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scattering of Antiplane Shear Waves by Fractals in Strain Gradient Elasticity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2EAHZIPW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18768}
}
read the original abstract

Wave manipulation is essential in various applications, including seismic wave protection, sound isolation, and acoustic device design. This study examines the scattering and trapping of antiplane SH waves in a microstructured solid embedded with rigid pins. The material's response is governed by the theory of strain gradient elasticity. A method is proposed for identifying the wavenumbers that induce resonance in the elastic body, based on specific material parameters and pin configurations. The analysis focuses on a system featuring a Koch snowflake-type pin layout, a fractal curve generated through an iterative process. This geometry allows the exploration of a complex arrangement characterized by a high concentration of sharp corners that promote scattering. The system's response to this self-similar configuration is analysed and compared to circular pin arrangements with an equivalent number of pins. A distinct resonance mode is identified, where the motion is trapped within the pin configuration and the conditions for its emergence are analyzed in detail. Furthermore, the study explores the influence of the characteristic lengths of the problem that are induced by the dynamic gradient elasticity theory. The findings indicate that in fractal pin arrangements, the system's response is rather dictated by the fractal dimension rather than by the total number of pins, highlighting the significance of geometry in wave propagation dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18768 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Configuration of pins embedded in an infinite elastic microstructured medium subjected to an incident SH harmonic plane wave. To facilitate the numerical computations, the Green’s function (39) is expressed using the following dimensionless parameters: X = x ℓ , Y = y ℓ , H = h ℓ , KS = ℓkS = ℓω VS . (45) This normalisation enables the classification of the dispersion behavior using solely the dimen￾sionless paramet… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) − (c) detected resonant frequencies, (d) propagating (non-localized) mode KS = 275.851, and (e) trapping (localized) mode KS = 296.959, for a circular configuration of unit diameter consisting of 12 pins, H = 0 (no microinertia). Figure 2a illustrates the detected local minima for a circular arrangement of 12 pins subjected to unit amplitude SH waves for values of KS < 100. In general, sharper local minima of |d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. First five iterations of the Koch snowflake, Np denotes the number of corners where the pins are located. The Koch snowflake is constructed in a sequence of stages starting with an equilateral tri￾angle, followed by a recursive alteration of each line segment as follows: Initially the straight segments are divided into three segments of equal length. Then, an outward pointing equilat￾eral triangle that has the middl… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Variation of the normalized determinant of the Green’s matrix for a pin configuration corresponding to the 2nd iteration of the Koch snowflake, for different values of H. . Moreover, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distribution of the non-dimensional displacement for a pined configuration corresponding to the 4 th iteration of the Koch snowflake: (a) H = 0, (b) H = 0.1, (c) H = 1. 5.2 The effect of pin configuration dimension For a given pin configuration, whether circular or bas…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Beyond a certain iteration, however, the response converges: both the number and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Variation of the normalized determinant of the Green’s matrix and detected trapping (localized) modes for the Koch snowflake and for circular configurations with: (a) 12, (b) 48, (c) 192, (d) 768 pins, H = 0. same number of pins as the corresponding Koch iterations, in…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distribution of the non-dimensional displacement for the first four iterations of the Koch snowflake at the first resonant mode. 𝑎 𝐾𝑆 = 208.135 𝑏 𝐾𝑆 = 256.395097 𝑐 𝐾𝑆 = 256.591120 𝑋 𝑌 𝑋 𝑌 𝑋 𝑌 𝑈 𝑈 𝑈 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distribution of the non-dimensional displacement for circular configurations with: (a) 12, (b) 48, (c) 192 pins at the first resonant mode, H = 0. 𝑎 𝑌 𝑌 𝑋 𝑈 𝑈 𝑈 𝑈 𝑋 𝑏 𝑌 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Deformed state of the: (a) surrounding area and (b) Koch snowflake, at a trapping (localized) mode, KS = 381.592, H = 0, NP = 12. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Deformed state of the: (a) surrounding area and (b) Koch snowflake, at a propagating (non￾localized) response, KS = 524.125, H = 0, NP = 12. response amplitude quantified by |Umax| varies with ψ. For each resonance, there exists an optimal angle of incidence that maxi…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Distribution of the non-dimensional displacement for a pined configuration corresponding to the 2 nd iteration of the Koch snowflake at different incident wave angles when KS = 436.43373, H = 0. In the case of circular pin arrangements, the angle of incidence, as expe…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Distribution of the non-dimensional displacement for multiple pin configurations corresponding to the: (a) 1st, (b) 2nd iterations of the Koch snowflake at the first resonant mode. 𝑎 𝐾𝑆 = 64.29056 𝑏 𝐾𝑆 = 262.1498154 𝑋 𝑌 𝑌 𝑋 𝑈 𝑈 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Distribution of the non-dimensional displacement for multiple pin configurations corresponding to the: (a) 1st, (b) 2nd iteration of the Koch snowflake, shown at different resonant modes in which waves localise within each pin arrangement. This response is attained fo…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Distribution of the non-dimensional time-averaged energy densities: (a) kinetic T¯, (b) strain W¯ , and (c) total mechanical E¯ energy for the 2nd iteration of the Koch snowflake, for a propagating (non-localized) response: H = 0. 𝑎 𝐾𝑆 = 338.2425 𝑏 𝐾𝑆 = 338.2425 𝑐 𝐾𝑆 …
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Distribution of the non-dimensional time-averaged energy densities: (a) kinetic T¯, (b) strain W¯ , and (c) total mechanical E¯ energy for the 2nd iterations of the Koch snowflake, for a trapping (localized) mode: H = 0. framework. Two pin configurations are studied: …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Berry, Diffractals, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 12 (6) (1979) 781

    M. Berry, Diffractals, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 12 (6) (1979) 781

    work page 1979

  2. [2]

    D. L. Jaggard, On fractal electrodynamics (1990) 183–224

    work page 1990

  3. [3]

    D. L. Jaggard, Fractal electrodynamics and modeling, Springer, 1991, pp. 435–446

    work page 1991

  4. [4]

    C. L. Aguili, T. B. Salah, T. Aguili, A. Bouallegue, H. Baudrand, Study of electromag- netic waves diffraction by bi-dimensional fractal structures using the renormalization method, Vol. 63, Elsevier, 2009, pp. 720–727

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Bhattacharyya, J

    A. Bhattacharyya, J. ¨Ogren, M. Holz, V. Ziemann, Wave propagation in a fractal wave guide, Proc. IPAC2017. Copenhagen, Denmark 86 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    I. V. Andrianov, J. Awrejcewicz, V. Danishevskyy, Linear and nonlinear waves in mi- crostructured solids: homogenization and asymptotic approaches, CRC Press, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    A. B. Movchan, N. V. Movchan, I. S. Jones, D. J. Colquitt, Mathematical modelling of waves in multi-scale structured media, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Parnell, P

    W. Parnell, P. Martin, Multiple scattering of flexural waves by random configurations of inclusions in thin plates, Wave Motion 48 (2) (2011) 161–175

    work page 2011

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    R. V. Craster, J. Kaplunov, A. V. Pichugin, High-frequency homogenization for periodic media, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 466 (2120) (2010) 2341–2362

    2010

  2. [10]

    Guenneau, R

    S. Guenneau, R. Craster, T. Antonakakis, K. Cherednichenko, S. Cooper, Homogeniza- tion techniques for periodic structures, arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.7519 (2013)

    2013 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Touboul, B

    M. Touboul, B. Vial, R. Assier, S. Guenneau, R. V. Craster, High-frequency homoge- nization for periodic dispersive media, Multiscale Modeling & Simulation 22 (3) (2024) 1136–1168

    2024

  4. [12]

    V. A. Eremeyev, G. Rosi, S. Naili, Comparison of anti-plane surface waves in strain- gradient materials and materials with surface stresses, Mathematics and mechanics of solids 24 (8) (2019) 2526–2535

    2019

  5. [13]

    Eremeyev, Strongly anisotropic surface elasticity and antiplane surface waves, Philo- sophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 378 (2162) (2020) 20190100

    V. Eremeyev, Strongly anisotropic surface elasticity and antiplane surface waves, Philo- sophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 378 (2162) (2020) 20190100

    2020

  6. [14]

    H. M. Shodja, L. Pahlevani, Surface/interface effect on the scattered fields of an anti- plane shear wave in an infinite medium by a concentric multi-coated nanofiber/nanotube, European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids 32 (2012) 21–31

    2012

  7. [15]

    H. M. Shodja, A. Goodarzi, M. R. Delfani, H. Haftbaradaran, Scattering of an anti-plane shear wave by an embedded cylindrical micro-/nano-fiber within couple stress theory with micro inertia, International Journal of Solids and Structures 58 (2015) 73–90

    2015

  8. [16]

    M. R. Delfani, H. Bidi, Strain-gradient solution to elastodynamic scattering from a cylin- drical inhomogeneity, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 261 (2024) 108667

    2024

  9. [17]

    L´ azaro, M

    M. L´ azaro, M. Mart´ ı-Sabat´ e, R. V. Craster, V. Romero-Garc´ ıa, Weak scattering formu- lation for flexural waves in thin elastic plates with point-like resonators, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.23351 (2025). 23

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    D. V. Evans, R. Porter, Penetration of flexural waves through a periodically constrained thin elastic plate in vacuo and floating on water, Journal of Engineering Mathematics 58 (2007) 317–337

    2007

  11. [19]

    S. G. Haslinger, N. V. Movchan, A. B. Movchan, R. C. McPhedran, Transmission, trap- ping and filtering of waves in periodically constrained elastic plates, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 468 (2137) (2012) 76–93

    2012

  12. [20]

    S. G. Haslinger, R. C. McPhedran, N. V. Movchan, A. B. Movchan, Localisation near defects and filtering of flexural waves in structured plates, in: Fracture Phenomena in Nature and Technology: Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium on Fracture Phenomena in Nature and Technology he...

    2012

  13. [21]

    S. G. Haslinger, I. S. Jones, N. V. Movchan, A. B. Movchan, Localization in semi-infinite herringbone waveguides, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 474 (2211) (2018) 20170590

    2018

  14. [22]

    R. D. Mindlin, Micro-structure in linear elasticity, Archive for rational mechanics and analysis 16 (1964) 51–78

    1964

  15. [23]

    I. D. Gavardinas, A. E. Giannakopoulos, T. Zisis, A von karman plate analogue for solving anti-plane problems in couple stress and dipolar gradient elasticity, International Journal of Solids and Structures 148 (2018) 169–180

    2018

  16. [24]

    Alshaqaq, A

    M. Alshaqaq, A. Erturk, Graded multifunctional piezoelectric metastructures for wide- band vibration attenuation and energy harvesting, Smart Materials and Structures 30 (1) (2020) 015029

    2020

  17. [25]

    J. M. De Ponti, A. Colombi, R. Ardito, F. Braghin, A. Corigliano, R. V. Craster, Graded elastic metasurface for enhanced energy harvesting, New Journal of Physics 22 (1) (2020) 013013

    2020

  18. [26]

    J. M. De Ponti, et al., Graded elastic metamaterials for energy harvesting, Springer, 2021

    2021

  19. [27]

    Giannakopoulos, C

    A. Giannakopoulos, C. Knisovitis, A. Charalambopoulos, T. Zisis, A. J. Rosakis, Hy- perbolicity, mach lines, and super-shear mode iii steady-state fracture in magneto- flexoelectric materials, part i: Methodology, Journal of Applied Mechanics 90 (12) (2023) 121009

    2023

  20. [28]

    Knisovitis, A

    C. Knisovitis, A. E. Giannakopoulos, A. J. Rosakis, Anti-plane yoffe-type crack in flexo- electric material, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 311 (2024) 110551

    2024

  21. [29]

    Badreddine Assouar, M

    M. Badreddine Assouar, M. Senesi, M. Oudich, M. Ruzzene, Z. Hou, Broadband plate- type acoustic metamaterial for low-frequency sound attenuation, Applied Physics Letters 101 (17) (2012)

    2012

  22. [30]

    Miniaci, A

    M. Miniaci, A. Krushynska, F. Bosia, N. M. Pugno, Large scale mechanical metamaterials as seismic shields, New Journal of Physics 18 (8) (2016) 083041

    2016

  23. [31]

    Achaoui, T

    Y. Achaoui, T. Antonakakis, S. Brˆ ul´ e, R. Craster, S. Enoch, S. Guenneau, Clamped seismic metamaterials: ultra-low frequency stop bands, New Journal of Physics 19 (6) (2017) 063022. 24

    2017

  24. [32]

    Brˆ ul´ e, E

    S. Brˆ ul´ e, E. Javelaud, S. Enoch, S. Guenneau, Experiments on seismic metamaterials: molding surface waves, Physical review letters 112 (13) (2014) 133901

    2014

  25. [33]

    Brˆ ul´ e, E

    S. Brˆ ul´ e, E. H. Javelaud, S. Enoch, S. Guenneau, Flat lens effect on seismic waves propagation in the subsoil, Scientific reports 7 (1) (2017) 18066

    2017

  26. [34]

    R. V. Craster, S. Guenneau, Acoustic metamaterials: negative refraction, imaging, lens- ing and cloaking, Vol. 166, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  27. [35]

    Nobili, E

    A. Nobili, E. Radi, C. Signorini, A new rayleigh-like wave in guided propagation of antiplane waves in couple stress materials, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 476 (2235) (2020) 20190822

    2020

  28. [36]

    Movchan, G

    A. Movchan, G. Mishuris, F. Sabina, Wave generation and transmission in multi-scale complex media and structured metamaterials, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 380 (2231) (2022) 20220141

    2022

  29. [37]

    Rizzi, M

    G. Rizzi, M. V. d’Agostino, J. Voss, D. Bernardini, P. Neff, A. Madeo, From frequency- dependent models to frequency-independent enriched continua for mechanical metama- terials, European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids 106 (2024) 105269

    2024

  30. [38]

    J. Voss, G. Rizzi, P. Neff, A. Madeo, Modeling a labyrinthine acoustic metamaterial through an inertia-augmented relaxed micromorphic approach, Mathematics and Me- chanics of Solids 28 (10) (2023) 2177–2201

    2023

  31. [39]

    R. A. Toupin, Theories of elasticity with couple-stress, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 17 (2) (1964) 85–112

    1964

  32. [40]

    P. A. Gourgiotis, D. Bigoni, Stress channelling in extreme couple-stress materials part i: Strong ellipticity, wave propagation, ellipticity, and discontinuity relations, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 88 (2016) 150–168

    2016

  33. [41]

    P. A. Gourgiotis, H. G. Georgiadis, I. Neocleous, On the reflection of waves in half-spaces of microstructured materials governed by dipolar gradient elasticity, Wave Motion 50 (3) (2013) 437–455

    2013

  34. [42]

    Srivastava, Elastic metamaterials and dynamic homogenization: a review, Interna- tional Journal of Smart and Nano Materials 6 (1) (2015) 41–60

    A. Srivastava, Elastic metamaterials and dynamic homogenization: a review, Interna- tional Journal of Smart and Nano Materials 6 (1) (2015) 41–60

    2015

  35. [43]

    Achenbach, Wave propagation in elastic solids, Elsevier, 2012

    J. Achenbach, Wave propagation in elastic solids, Elsevier, 2012

    2012

  36. [44]

    G. Rosi, N. Auffray, Anisotropic and dispersive wave propagation within strain-gradient framework, Wave Motion 63 (2016) 120–134

    2016

  37. [45]

    Mishuris, A

    G. Mishuris, A. Piccolroaz, E. Radi, Steady-state propagation of a mode iii crack in couple stress elastic materials, International Journal of Engineering Science 61 (2012) 112–128

    2012

  38. [46]

    P. A. Gourgiotis, D. Bigoni, The dynamics of folding instability in a constrained cosserat medium, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 375 (2093) (2017) 20160159

    2017

  39. [47]

    K. F. Graff, Wave motion in elastic solids, Courier Corporation, 2012

    2012

  40. [48]

    J. N. Reddy, Theory and analysis of elastic plates and shells, CRC press, 2006. 25

    2006

  41. [49]

    Clebsch, Th´ eorie de l’´ elasticit´ e des corps solides, Dunod, 1883

    A. Clebsch, Th´ eorie de l’´ elasticit´ e des corps solides, Dunod, 1883

  42. [50]

    P. A. Gourgiotis, H. G. Georgiadis, Torsional and sh surface waves in an isotropic and homogenous elastic half-space characterized by the toupin–mindlin gradient theory, In- ternational Journal of Solids and Structures 62 (2015) 217–228

    2015

  43. [51]

    Zisis, X

    T. Zisis, X. Kuci, H. G. Georgiadis, Wave reflection and rayleigh waves in the context of the complete toupin–mindlin theory of strain gradient elasticity, Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures 18 (4) (2023) 567–592

    2023

  44. [52]

    H. V. Koch, Sur une courbe continue sans tangente, obtenue par une construction g´ eom´ etrique ´ el´ ementaire, Arkiv for Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik 1 (1904) 681–704

    1904

  45. [53]

    J. H. Conway, H. Burgiel, C. Goodman-Strauss, The symmetries of things, CRC Press, 2016

    2016

  46. [54]

    G. N. Watson, A treatise on the theory of Bessel functions, Vol. 2, The University Press, 1922. 26

    1922

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.