Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 2 cited by

Flexible Intelligent Metasurfaces in High-Mobility MIMO Integrated Sensing and Communications

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that treating the vertical positions of flexible-metasurface elements as design variables improves both communication rate and sensing accuracy in high-mobility MIMO integrated sensing and communications.

desk verdict Solid incremental extension of the authors' DD-metasurface line, but the headline FIM gains are not isolated from generic per-element phase control. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18793 v1 pith:CPAH2ZEZ submitted 2025-07-24 eess.SP

Kuranage Roche Rayan Ranasinghe , Jiancheng An , Iván Alexander Morales Sandoval , Hyeon Seok Rou , Giuseppe Thadeu Freitas de Abreu , Chau Yuen , Mérouane Debbah This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords flexibleintelligentmetasurfacesdoublydispersivechannelMIMOintegratedsensingandcommunicationsOFDMOTFSAFDMachievablerate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Flexible intelligent metasurfaces (FIMs) can bend their elements out of the array plane, and this paper argues that those element positions are a usable design resource rather than a mechanical nuisance. It builds a doubly dispersive MIMO channel model in which each FIM element's vertical coordinate $y_b$ enters only through a phase factor in the array response, and it derives input-output relations for OFDM, OTFS, and AFDM under that model. The paper then optimizes the vertical positions of transmitter and receiver FIMs with gradient ascent, subject to a sensing power constraint, and reports about 2.5 dB of achievable-rate gain from random FIM shapes and roughly another 2 dB from optimized shapes. The same optimization sharpens MUSIC angle-of-arrival spectra, so a single FIM deformation serves both communication and sensing.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the FIM array response vector $\mathbf{b}(y,\phi,\theta)$, whose phase depends on each element's position $y$ along the morphing axis, combined with the effective MIMO channel $\bar{\mathbf{H}}(y_T,y_R)=\sum_p \check{\mathbf{H}}_p\otimes \mathbf{G}_p$, where $\check{\mathbf{H}}_p$ carries the FIM-dependent array outer products and $\mathbf{G}_p$ is the waveform-specific delay-Doppler matrix for OFDM, OTFS, or AFDM. This separable structure lets the gradient of the achievable rate with respect to each $y$ coordinate be written in closed form, so a simple gradient-ascent update with a line search can deform the surfaces. The morphing range $y_{\min}\le y_b\le y_{\max}$ is the resource being allocated.

What would settle it

Take a small morphing element or a full-wave model of one, move its position over the range $\pm\lambda$, and compare the measured or simulated complex channel against the phase-only prediction $e^{j2\pi y_b\sin\theta\sin\phi/\lambda}$. If amplitude variations, delay shifts, or pattern changes appear at a level that affects the channel, the reported rate and sensing gains from shape optimization will not transfer to hardware.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the geometric shape of a FIM is itself an optimization variable that materially changes MIMO performance in fast, frequency-selective channels. The paper's FPDD channel model writes the channel as a sum over paths of outer products of FIM array responses, with the $b$-th element's response carrying the factor $e^{j2\pi y_b \sin\theta \sin\phi/\lambda}$; because this factor depends on the vertical position $y_b$, the surface shape enters every waveform's effective channel through the same array response. Solving the achievable-rate maximization with the sensing constraint $\operatorname{tr}(\bar{H}(y_T,y_R)T\bar{H}^H(y_T,y_R))\ge \Psi$ by gradient ascent yields the reported rate gains and cleaner MUSIC peaks for all three waveforms.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the premise that moving a FIM element out of the plane changes only the phase of that element's contribution, leaving delays, Doppler shifts, radiation patterns, mutual coupling, and near-field behavior exactly as they were.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any of the three waveforms inherits the FIM gain, since the shape enters through the physical array response rather than through the modulation.
  • Optimized FIM shapes can be computed from one channel realization and then reused when delays, Doppler shifts, or the waveform change.
  • A sensing power constraint can be enforced alongside the rate objective through a penalty term without abandoning closed-form gradients.
  • Larger morphing ranges and more elements give more degrees of freedom, so the gain scales with the FIM's flexibility and size.
  • MUSIC direction finding benefits even though the optimization objective is communication rate, because the optimized response separates scatterer peaks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the phase-only model is optimistic, real FIM prototypes may show smaller gains; a full-wave simulation or measured prototype that compares the modeled and actual channel as $y$ moves would settle this.
  • The shape optimization acts as a mechanically reconfigurable phase taper, so combining it with digital precoding or power allocation could push the rate further than the identity-covariance assumption used here.
  • Rate parity across waveforms is a mutual-information statement; practical bit-error-rate and inter-carrier-interference behavior would probably still favor OTFS and AFDM at high Doppler.
  • Because the paper does not quantify angular resolution or Cramér-Rao bounds, the sensing improvement is demonstrated qualitatively via spectra; a resolution-bound analysis would be a direct next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a FIM-parameterized doubly-dispersive (FPDD) MIMO channel model in which the y-coordinates of the meta-atoms enter the array response through phase-only factors, and applies the model to OFDM, OTFS, and AFDM in a high-mobility ISAC setting. It derives effective input-output relations for the three waveforms, formulates a joint achievable-rate maximization problem with a sensing constraint, solves it by gradient ascent with closed-form gradients, and reports simulations showing rate gains and sharper MUSIC-based angle-of-arrival estimates when FIMs are optimized. The paper is clearly written and the signal-processing derivations are mostly standard, but the numerical evidence for the FIM-specific claim is incomplete.

Significance. If the results held, the paper would provide a unified optimization framework for metasurface shape design across three important DD-channel waveforms. The derivation of the effective channel matrices for OFDM, OTFS, and AFDM is careful, and the closed-form gradient expressions appear correct, which are useful assets. However, the paper does not compare against a conventional phase-controlled array or RIS with the same number of phase-only degrees of freedom, and the optimization and evaluation use the same idealized model. The paper is therefore more convincing as a rate-optimization framework for phase-configurable arrays than as evidence that physical FIM morphing provides intrinsic gains beyond what ordinary per-element phase control can achieve.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.A, Eq. (3), and Section IV.B, Eq. (35)] The response vector depends on the FIM coordinates only through the phase factor e^{j(2π/λ)y_b sinθ sinφ}. Because each y_b is an independent continuous variable, the optimization in Eq. (35) has the same structure and the same number of degrees of freedom as optimizing per-element phase shifters in a conventional array. The numerical comparisons in Figs. 2-6 are only y=0 versus random or optimized y; there is no baseline with the same number of phase-only degrees of freedom, such as a conventional phase-controlled array or an RIS with independent phase shifts. The reported gains of about 2.5 dB for random FIMs, the additional 2 dB for optimized FIMs, and the MUSIC improvements are therefore not attributable to the physical morphing mechanism; they may simply demonstrate the benefit of adding phase degrees of freedom. This is load-bearing for the paper's central claim.
  2. [Section II.A, Eqs. (1c)-(2), and Algorithm 1] The optimization treats each y_b as an independent variable under only box constraints and ignores the mechanical coupling of a continuous elastic surface, as well as changes in radiation patterns and mutual coupling. Moreover, the update rule in Eq. (46) is an unconstrained gradient step; no projection onto [ymin, ymax] is described, so the final y values may violate the stated bounds. Without either physical shape constraints or a projection/barrier mechanism, the optimized y values may not be realizable by a flexible metasurface.
  3. [Section IV.A-B, Eq. (31c), and Section V] The optimization and evaluation use the same idealized model, and Algorithm 1 requires perfect knowledge of all path parameters (gains, delays, Doppler shifts, and angles) while the transmit covariance is fixed to T=I_Nds. In addition, the sensing constraint in Eq. (31c) is a total received-power proxy, not a detection or estimation metric, so the MUSIC results in Figs. 4-6 are not directly optimized by the algorithm. These issues do not invalidate the derivations, but they mean that the practical gains in a real FIM/ISAC system are not yet established.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section II.A, Eq. (2)] The text sets ymin=0 after Eq. (1c), whereas Table II sets ymin=-λ m; Eq. (2) defines y as nonnegative, which also excludes the negative values permitted by Table II. Please reconcile these definitions.
  2. [Table II] The row 'Sampling Frequency λ 20 MHz' should read 'Sampling Frequency F_S 20 MHz'; the symbol λ is used for wavelength elsewhere.
  3. [Section IV.B, Eq. (37)] 'Hardamard product' should be 'Hadamard product'.
  4. [Figure captions] The captions in Figs. 2-3 contain 'NT=NT=4', which should be 'NT=NR=4', and the axis labels in Figs. 4-7 contain garbled LaTeX such as '?inp' and '3inp'. Please fix these rendering issues.
  5. [Section V.A] The sentence 'the achievable rates for the different waveforms across all the cases are almost identical...' is repeated verbatim after Fig. 3; the duplicate should be removed.
  6. [References] Reference [11] appears incomplete: 'D. W. Bliss and S. Govindasamy. Cambridge University Press, 2013' is missing the book title.
  7. [Section IV.B] The approximation T≈I_Nds is justified only for large N·ds, but the simulations use N=16 or 64 and ds=4; a sensitivity check or a footnote assessing this approximation would be useful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the FIM-dependent rate and sensing results are direct evaluations of the paper's own channel model, not predictions resting on fitted inputs or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-consistent but not circular. The FIM deformation vector y enters the channel exclusively through the array response b(y, φ, θ) in Eq. (3), via the phase term e^{j(2π/λ)(... + y sinθ sinφ + ...)}. The optimization problem in Eq. (35) maximizes an achievable-rate expression built from the same channel matrices, and the gradients in Eqs. (36)-(46) are closed-form derivatives of that same objective. This is ordinary optimization of a stated model, not a fitted parameter disguised as a prediction: there is no empirical dataset, no parameter estimated from a subset of outcomes, and no claim that the optimized rate is an independent measurement. The improved rates and MUSIC peaks are feasible values of the model's own objective, so reporting them does not reduce a predicted quantity to an input by construction. The paper does rely on prior work for its waveform I/O relationships (e.g., [13], an independent published comparative study) and for the FIM phase-only response model and the neglect of delay/Doppler variation due to morphing (e.g., [43], footnote 3). These are self-citations by the same research groups, but they are used as transparently stated modeling assumptions and background derivations, not as an external authority that is itself the target result. The main weaknesses, namely the absence of a same-degree-of-freedom phase-only baseline and the physical idealization that morphing creates only phase shifts, are correctness and physical-realizability concerns, not circularity: they do not make Eq. (35)'s result equal to its input by definition. Accordingly, no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central contribution is a parametric model, and the numbers listed are simulation or optimization hyperparameters, not fitted data constants. The load-bearing premises are the physical point-radiator FIM model and the discrete doubly dispersive channel structure borrowed from prior work.

free parameters (3)
  • AFDM chirp parameters c1 and c2 = not specified
    Defined in Eq. (26) as optimized and flexible, but the simulation values are not reported; AFDM behavior depends on them.
  • Penalty factor beta = 2
    Chosen by hand in Section V for the communication-sensing tradeoff; no systematic selection is described.
  • Gradient ascent step size mu = not specified (Armijo line search)
    Eq. (46) uses mu and the text says it is obtained via Armijo line search, but the line search parameters or step size values are not given.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Far-field point-radiator array response with plane-wave phase progression (Eq. 3)
    Underpins how y_b enters the channel; ignores mutual coupling, radiation pattern changes, and near-field effects.
  • domain assumption FIM motion affects only the array phase, not path delays or Doppler shifts (footnote 3)
    Required for the channel to factor as in Eq. (4) with y-independent delay and Doppler parameters.
  • domain assumption Discrete doubly dispersive channel per-path matrix G_p = Theta_p Omega^{f_p} Pi^{ell_p} taken from Rou et al. [13]
    Basis for Eqs. (7)-(9); assumes sampled, cyclic-prefixed circular convolution and integer normalized delays.
  • ad hoc to paper Transmit covariance T is approximated by I_Nds for large N*ds (Section IV.B)
    Replaces optimization over T to isolate FIM effects; no finite-N justification or convergence bound is provided.
  • domain assumption Perfect knowledge of all path parameters for gradient computation (Algorithm 1)
    Equations (36)-(45) require the full channel H and its gradients, hence h_p, angles, delays, and Doppler shifts for every path; channel estimation is not addressed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Flexible Intelligent Metasurfaces in High-Mobility MIMO Integrated Sensing and Communications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CPAH2ZEZ

@misc{pith2026250718793,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Flexible Intelligent Metasurfaces in High-Mobility MIMO Integrated Sensing and Communications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CPAH2ZEZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18793}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a novel doubly-dispersive (DD) multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channel model incorporating flexible intelligent metasurfaces (FIMs), which is suitable for integrated sensing and communications (ISAC) in high-mobility scenarios. We then discuss how the proposed FIM-parameterized DD (FPDD) channel model can be applied in a logical manner to ISAC waveforms that are known to perform well in DD environments, namely, orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM), orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS), and affine frequency division multiplexing (AFDM). Leveraging the proposed model, we formulate an achievable rate maximization problem with a strong sensing constraint for all the aforementioned waveforms, which we then solve via a gradient ascent algorithm with closed-form gradients presented as a bonus. Our numerical results indicate that the achievable rate is significantly impacted by the emerging FIM technology with careful parametrization essential in obtaining strong ISAC performance across all waveforms suitable to mitigating the effects of DD channels.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18793 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The considered FIM MIMO system for high-mobility scenarios, which includes two FIMs, one acting as the transmitter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Achievable Rate vs. signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Achievable Rate vs. SNR of the proposed FIM opti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Normalized Power Spectrum for OFDM waveforms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Normalized Power Spectrum for OTFS waveforms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Normalized 2D Power Spectrum for different wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Doubly-Dispersive Continuous MIMO Systems: Channel Modeling and Beamforming Design

    eess.SP 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A doubly-dispersive continuous MIMO channel model with matched-filter-like beamforming is derived, but the variational optimality proof is invalid because the unconstrained problem is unbounded.

  2. AFDM: Evolving OFDM Towards 6G+

    eess.SP 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    AFDM is presented as an OFDM-backward-compatible 6G+ waveform whose added transceiver cost is two O(N) chirp rotations, supported by a generalized pulse-shaped FDFD channel formulation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Advanced learning algorithms for integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) systems in 6G and beyond: A comprehensive survey,

    N. C. Luong et al., “Advanced learning algorithms for integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) systems in 6G and beyond: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , pp. 1–1, 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    From theory to reality: A design framework for integrated communication and computing receivers,

    K. R. Rayan Ranasinghe, K. Ando, and G. T. Freitas de Abreu, “From theory to reality: A design framework for integrated communication and computing receivers,” in 2025 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) , 2025, pp. 865–870

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    A flexible design framework for integrated communication and computing receivers,

    K. R. R. Ranasinghe, K. Ando, H. S. Rou, G. T. F. de Abreu, T. Takahashi, M. D. Renzo, and D. G. Gonzalez, “A flexible design framework for integrated communication and computing receivers,”

    work page

  4. [4]

    Toward 6G-based metaverse: Supporting highly-dynamic deterministic multi-user extended reality services,

    H. Yu, M. Shokrnezhad, T. Taleb, R. Li, and J. Song, “Toward 6G-based metaverse: Supporting highly-dynamic deterministic multi-user extended reality services,” IEEE Network, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 30–38, 2023. 12

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Network-aided intelligent traffic steering in 6G O- Ran: A multi-layer optimization framework,

    V .-D. Nguyen et al., “Network-aided intelligent traffic steering in 6G O- Ran: A multi-layer optimization framework,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 389–405, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Space-air-ground integrated network (SAGIN) for 6G: Requirements, architecture and challenges,

    H. Cui et al. , “Space-air-ground integrated network (SAGIN) for 6G: Requirements, architecture and challenges,” China Communications , vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 90–108, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Reconfigurable holographic surfaces for ultra-massive MIMO in 6G: Practical design, optimization and implementation,

    R. Deng et al. , “Reconfigurable holographic surfaces for ultra-massive MIMO in 6G: Practical design, optimization and implementation,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Comm. , vol. 41, no. 8, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    6G wireless communication systems: Applica- tions, requirements, technologies, challenges, and research directions,

    M. Z. Chowdhury et al., “6G wireless communication systems: Applica- tions, requirements, technologies, challenges, and research directions,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 1, 2020

    work page 2020

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    What should 6G be?

    S. Dang, O. Amin, B. Shihada, and M.-S. Alouini, “What should 6G be?” Nature Electronics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    To- ward 6G networks: Use cases and technologies,

    M. Giordani, M. Polese, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan, and M. Zorzi, “To- ward 6G networks: Use cases and technologies,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 55–61, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    D. W. Bliss and S. Govindasamy. Cambridge University Press, 2013

    2013

  4. [12]

    A speculative study on 6G,

    F. Tariq et al., “A speculative study on 6G,” IEEE Wireless Communi- cations, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 118–125, 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    H. S. Rou et al. , “From orthogonal time–frequency space to affine frequency-division multiplexing: A comparative study of next-generation waveforms for integrated sensing and communications in doubly disper- sive channels,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag. , vol. 41, no. 5, 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Orthogonal time frequency space modulation,

    R. Hadani et al. , “Orthogonal time frequency space modulation,” in Proc. IEEE WCNC , San Francisco, USA, 2017

    2017

  7. [15]

    Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual- functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond,

    F. Liu et al. , “Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual- functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Comm. , vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, 2022

    2022

  8. [16]

    Joint communications and sensing hybrid beam- forming design via deep unfolding,

    N. T. Nguyen et al., “Joint communications and sensing hybrid beam- forming design via deep unfolding,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 901–916, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    A novel joint angle-range-velocity estimation method for MIMO-OFDM ISAC systems,

    Z. Xiao et al. , “A novel joint angle-range-velocity estimation method for MIMO-OFDM ISAC systems,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Pro- cessing, vol. 72, pp. 3805–3818, 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Joint channel, data, and radar parameter estimation for AFDM systems in doubly-dispersive channels,

    K. R. R. Ranasinghe et al. , “Joint channel, data, and radar parameter estimation for AFDM systems in doubly-dispersive channels,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 24, no. 2, 2025

    2025

  11. [19]

    A novel angle-delay-doppler estimation scheme for AFDM-ISAC system in mixed near-field and far-field scenarios,

    Y . Luo et al. , “A novel angle-delay-doppler estimation scheme for AFDM-ISAC system in mixed near-field and far-field scenarios,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 12, no. 13, 2025

    2025

  12. [20]

    Integrated sensing and communications (ISAC) for vehicular communication networks (VCN),

    X. Cheng, D. Duan, S. Gao, and L. Yang, “Integrated sensing and communications (ISAC) for vehicular communication networks (VCN),” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 23, pp. 23 441–23 451, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Hybrid reconfigurable intelligent meta- surfaces: Enabling simultaneous tunable reflections and sensing for 6G wireless communications,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos et al. , “Hybrid reconfigurable intelligent meta- surfaces: Enabling simultaneous tunable reflections and sensing for 6G wireless communications,” IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine , vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Efficient and physically consistent modeling of reconfigurable electromagnetic structures,

    A. Stutz-Tirri et al. , “Efficient and physically consistent modeling of reconfigurable electromagnetic structures,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 6, pp. 1610–1633, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    Over-the-air multifunctional wideband electromagnetic signal processing using dynamic scattering arrays,

    D. Dardari, “Over-the-air multifunctional wideband electromagnetic signal processing using dynamic scattering arrays,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00619

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    A reconfigurable intelligent surface with surface-wave assisted beamforming capabilities,

    V . G. Ataloglou and G. V . Eleftheriades, “A reconfigurable intelligent surface with surface-wave assisted beamforming capabilities,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  17. [25]

    Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable metamaterials,

    T. J. Cui et al. , “Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable metamaterials,” Light Sci. & Appl. , vol. 3, no. 10, 2014

    2014

  18. [26]

    Nonlinear distortion radiated from large arrays and active reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    N. Kolomvakis, A. Kosasih, and E. Bj ¨ornson, “Nonlinear distortion radiated from large arrays and active reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 24, no. 6, 2025

    2025

  19. [27]

    Recon- figurable intelligent surfaces as spatial filters,

    S. Droulias, G. Stratidakis, E. Bj ¨ornson, and A. Alexiou, “Recon- figurable intelligent surfaces as spatial filters,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 16 922–16 934, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Target detection and positioning aided by reconfigurable surfaces: Reflective or holographic?

    X. Zhang, H. Zhang, L. Liu, Z. Han, H. V . Poor, and B. Di, “Target detection and positioning aided by reconfigurable surfaces: Reflective or holographic?” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 19 215–19 230, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Stacked intelligent metasurface-aided MIMO transceiver design,

    J. An et al. , “Stacked intelligent metasurface-aided MIMO transceiver design,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 123–131, 2024

    2024

  22. [31]

    Flexible intelligent metasurfaces for downlink multiuser MISO communications,

    J. An et al. , “Flexible intelligent metasurfaces for downlink multiuser MISO communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2940–2955, 2025

    2025

  23. [32]

    A dynamically reprogrammable surface with self-evolving shape morphing,

    Y . Bai et al., “A dynamically reprogrammable surface with self-evolving shape morphing,” Nature, vol. 609, no. 7928, pp. 701–708, Sep. 2022

    2022

  24. [33]

    Emerging technologies in intelligent metasurfaces: Shaping the future of wireless communications,

    J. An, M. Debbah, T. J. Cui, Z. N. Chen, and C. Yuen, “Emerging technologies in intelligent metasurfaces: Shaping the future of wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  25. [34]

    An ultrathin invisibility skin cloak for visible light,

    X. Ni et al., “An ultrathin invisibility skin cloak for visible light,” Sci., vol. 349, no. 6254, pp. 1310–1314, Sep. 2015

    2015

  26. [35]

    Decoupling optical function and geometrical form using conformal flexible dielectric metasurfaces,

    S. M. Kamali et al., “Decoupling optical function and geometrical form using conformal flexible dielectric metasurfaces,” Nature Commun. , vol. 7, no. 1, p. 11618, May 2016

    2016

  27. [36]

    Soft shape-programmable surfaces by fast electromagnetic actuation of liquid metal networks,

    X. Ni et al., “Soft shape-programmable surfaces by fast electromagnetic actuation of liquid metal networks,” Nature Commun., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 5576, Sep. 2022

    2022

  28. [37]

    Flexible intelligent metasurfaces for enhancing MIMO communications,

    J. An et al. , “Flexible intelligent metasurfaces for enhancing MIMO communications,” IEEE Trans. Commun., pp. 1–15, 2025, Early Access

    2025

  29. [38]

    Flexible intelligent metasurface for enhancing multi- target wireless sensing,

    Z. Teng et al. , “Flexible intelligent metasurface for enhancing multi- target wireless sensing,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., pp. 1–6, 2025

    2025

  30. [39]

    Metasurfaces-integrated doubly-dispersive MIMO: Channel modeling and optimization,

    K. R. R. Ranasinghe et al., “Metasurfaces-integrated doubly-dispersive MIMO: Channel modeling and optimization,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14985

    2025 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Doubly-dispersive MIMO channels with stacked intelligent metasurfaces: Modeling, parametrization, and receiver design,

    K. R. R. Ranasinghe et al. , “Doubly-dispersive MIMO channels with stacked intelligent metasurfaces: Modeling, parametrization, and receiver design,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07724

    2025 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Parametrized stacked intelligent metasurfaces for bistatic integrated sensing and communications,

    K. R. R. Ranasinghe, I. A. M. Sandoval, G. T. F. de Abreu, and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “Parametrized stacked intelligent metasurfaces for bistatic integrated sensing and communications,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20661

    2025 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for efficient holographic MIMO communications in 6G,

    J. An et al., “Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for efficient holographic MIMO communications in 6G,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 2380–2396, 2023

    2023

  34. [43]

    Flexible intelligent metasurfaces for downlink multiuser miso communications,

    J. An, C. Yuen et al. , “Flexible intelligent metasurfaces for downlink multiuser miso communications,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Com- munications, pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  35. [44]

    Two-dimensional direction-of-arrival estimation using stacked intelligent metasurfaces,

    J. An et al. , “Two-dimensional direction-of-arrival estimation using stacked intelligent metasurfaces,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2786–2802, 2024

    2024

  36. [45]

    Otfs transceiver design and sparse doubly-selective csi estimation in analog and hybrid beamforming aided mmwave mimo systems,

    S. Srivastava, R. K. Singh, A. K. Jagannatham, A. Chockalingam, and L. Hanzo, “Otfs transceiver design and sparse doubly-selective csi estimation in analog and hybrid beamforming aided mmwave mimo systems,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 10...

    2022

  37. [46]

    Off-grid channel estimation for OTFS-based mmwave hybrid beamforming systems,

    Y . Yan, C. Shan, J. Zhang, and H. Zhao, “Off-grid channel estimation for OTFS-based mmwave hybrid beamforming systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 2167–2171, 2023

    2023

  38. [47]

    Joint channel estimation and data detection for AFDM receivers with oversampling,

    K. R. Rayan Ranasinghe, Y . Ge, G. T. Freitas de Abreu, and Y . Liang Guan, “Joint channel estimation and data detection for AFDM receivers with oversampling,” in Proc. International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) , 2025

    2025

  39. [48]

    Interference cancellation and iterative detection for orthogonal time frequency space modulation,

    P. Raviteja et al. , “Interference cancellation and iterative detection for orthogonal time frequency space modulation,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 17, no. 10, 2018

    2018

  40. [49]

    Affine frequency division multiplexing for next generation wireless communications,

    A. Bemani, N. Ksairi, and M. Kountouris, “Affine frequency division multiplexing for next generation wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 8214–8229, 2023

    2023

  41. [50]

    A low- complexity radar system based on affine frequency division multiplexing modulation,

    J. Zhu, Y . Tang, X. Wei, H. Yin, J. Du, Z. Wang, and Y . Liu, “A low- complexity radar system based on affine frequency division multiplexing modulation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11125 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Pre-chirp-domain index mod- ulation for affine frequency division multiplexing,

    G. Liu, T. Mao, R. Liu, and Z. Xiao, “Pre-chirp-domain index mod- ulation for affine frequency division multiplexing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15185, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  43. [52]

    AFDM chirp-permutation-index modulation with quantum-accelerated codebook design,

    H. S. Rou et al. , “AFDM chirp-permutation-index modulation with quantum-accelerated codebook design,” IEEE Proceedings of the Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR)

  44. [53]

    Fast and efficient sequential radar parameter estimation in MIMO-OTFS systems,

    K. R. R. Ranasinghe, H. S. Rou, and G. T. F. de Abreu, “Fast and efficient sequential radar parameter estimation in MIMO-OTFS systems,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP , Seoul, South Korea, 2024

    2024

  45. [54]

    Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for integrated sensing and communications,

    H. Niu, J. An, A. Papazafeiropoulos, L. Gan, S. Chatzinotas, and M. Debbah, “Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for integrated sensing and communications,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , 2024

    2024

  46. [55]

    Blind bistatic radar parameter estimation for AFDM systems in doubly-dispersive channels,

    K. R. R. Ranasinghe et al., “Blind bistatic radar parameter estimation for AFDM systems in doubly-dispersive channels,” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) , 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05328

    2024 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Integrated sensing and communications with affine frequency division multiplexing,

    A. Bemani, N. Ksairi, and M. Kountouris, “Integrated sensing and communications with affine frequency division multiplexing,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., early access, 2024

    2024

  48. [2024]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02085

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02085

    arXiv

  49. [2025]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05944

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05944

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.