Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

MINERVA: A NIRCam Medium Band and MIRI Imaging Survey to Unlock the Hidden Gems of the Distant Universe

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read By adding eight NIRCam medium-band filters to existing JWST broadband fields, this survey shows photometric redshift scatter drops 3.7-fold and catastrophic outliers fall 2.6-fold, while enlarging medium-band sky coverage roughly sevenfold.

desk verdict A well-designed treasury survey with honest but incomplete simulations: the headline gains are inflated by an omitted HST near-IR baseline, though the qualitative case for medium bands holds. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19706 v1 pith:KPG5FKIH submitted 2025-07-25 astro-ph.GA

Adam Muzzin , Katherine A. Suess , Danilo Marchesini , Luke Robbins , Chris J. Willott , Stacey Alberts , Jacqueline Antwi-Danso , Yoshihisa Asada
show 76 more authors
Gabriel Brammer Sam E. Cutler Kartheik G. Iyer Ivo Labbe Nicholas S. Martis Tim B. Miller Ikki Mitsuhashi Alexandra Pope Anna Sajina Ghassan T. E. Sarrouh Monu Sharma Mauro Stefanon Katherine E. Whitaker Roberto Abraham Hakim Atek Marusa Bradac Samantha Berek Rachel Bezanson Westley Brown Adam J. Burgasser Nathalie Chicoine Aidan P. Cloonan Olivia R. Cooper Pratika Dayal Anna de Graaff Guillaume Desprez Robert Feldmann Ben Forrest Marijn Franx Yoshinobu Fudamoto Seiji Fujimoto Lukas J. Furtak Karl Glazebrook Ilias Goovaerts Jenny E. Greene Naadiyah Jagga William W.H. Jarvis Mariska Kriek Gourav Khullar Valentina La Torre Joel Leja Jamie Lin Brian Lorenz Daniel Lyon Vladan Markov Michael V. Maseda Ian McConachie Maya Merchant Rosa M. Merida Lamiya Mowla Katherine Myers Rohan P. Naidu Themiya Nanayakkara Erica J. Nelson Gael Noirot Pascal A. Oesch Kiyoaki C. Omori Richard Pan Natalia Porraz Barrera Sedona H. Price Swara Ravindranath Marcin Sawicki David J. Setton Renske Smit Visal Sok Joshua S. Speagle Edward N. Taylor Vivian Yun Yan Tan Roberta Tripodi Arjen van der Wel Edgar Perez Vidal Bingjie Wang John R. Weaver Christina C. Williams Sunna Withers Kumail Zaidi
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords JWSTNIRCammediumbandsphotometricredshiftsstellarmassesdeepextragalacticfieldsMIRIimaginggalaxyevolutiontreasurysurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

MINERVA is a Cycle-4 JWST treasury survey that will add eight NIRCam medium-band filters (F140M, F162M, F182M, F210M, F250M, F300M, F360M, F460M) and two MIRI filters (F1280W, F1500W) to four of the five CANDELS deep fields, which already have 7-9 broadband NIRCam filters from PRIMER, CEERS, and JADES. The paper's central claim, backed by simulations that degrade deep 23-filter photometry to PRIMER depth, is that the extra spectral resolution of medium bands breaks the Lyman/Balmer break and emission-line degeneracies that limit broadband-only surveys: photometric redshift scatter falls from 3.41% to 0.91% and the outlier fraction from 14.1% to 5.5%, while stellar mass scatter and outlier fraction improve by 1.78x and 2.47x. These gains come at only 2x the integration time of PRIMER alone. The survey increases the sky area with JWST medium-band coverage in at least eight bands by roughly 7x, to about 542 $arcmin^{2}$, making it the wide, shallow tier that can supply rare galaxies and statistically robust mass functions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the NIRCam medium-band filter set, which achieves spectral resolution R~15-30 instead of the R~4-5 typical of broadband filters. The eight chosen medium bands, spread evenly from 1.4 to 4.6 micron and supplemented by the existing F410M broadband, sample galaxy SEDs finely enough to separate the Balmer break from strong emission lines and to distinguish Lyman-break galaxies from low-redshift line-emitting impostors. The quantitative argument rests on a simulation pipeline: take the deep 23-filter photometry from UNCOVER/MegaScience and CANUCS/Technicolor as ground truth, add noise to mimic PRIMER depth, recompute photometric redshifts with EAZY and stellar masses with DENSE BASIS, with and without the medium bands, and compare the recovered values to the ground truth.

What would settle it

Take the four MINERVA fields, where thousands of NIRSpec spectroscopic redshifts already exist, and compare broadband-only versus broadband-plus-medium-band photometric redshifts against spectroscopy for galaxies with S/N>10 in F277W or F444W at PRIMER depth; if the outlier fraction does not drop from near 14% to near 5.5%, the central quantitative claim is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that medium-band photometry is not a luxury but a correction to broadband-only JWST surveys: adding eight medium bands to PRIMER-like data improves photometric redshift scatter by a factor of 3.7 and cuts catastrophic outliers by a factor of 2.6, with similar large reductions in stellar mass outliers. The paper further shows that after the first eight medium bands, additional filters and longer integrations continue to improve photo-z and mass precision roughly linearly with exposure time, and that the chosen 4+4 filter configuration is the most efficient use of Cycle-4 time. With 20-26 JWST filters per field and 26-35 total including HST, MINERVA aims to deliver a legacy photometric catalog whose completeness and systematics are understood well enough for population studies that current broadband data cannot support.

Load-bearing premise

The predicted improvement factors assume that the UNCOVER/MegaScience and CANUCS/Technicolor deep photometry, and the photometric redshifts and stellar masses derived from it, are exactly correct, so any bias in those reference values for faint or line-emitting galaxies would make the simulated gains smaller than claimed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Photometric redshift scatter in the four deep fields should fall by a factor of 3.7 and outlier fractions by 2.6, making demographic samples at $z>3$ far less contaminated by line-emitting or Balmer-break impostors.
  • Stellar masses improve by 1.78x in scatter and 2.47x in outlier fraction, which directly tightens stellar mass function and number density measurements, reducing systematics by factors of about 3 or more.
  • The roughly 7x larger medium-band area should yield samples of rare sources, including about 8,000 extreme emission-line galaxies, hundreds of Balmer-break quiescent galaxies at $z>4-6$, and robust candidates at $z>13$ that broadband surveys misclassify.
  • Resolved medium-band and MIRI maps can deliver H-alpha and continuum maps at ~500 pc scales for more than 10,000 galaxies at $1<z<6$.
  • The catalog with 20-26 JWST filters per field will be a long-lived resource for spectroscopic follow-up, since photo-z preselection becomes reliable enough to plan NIRSpec observations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's linear-scaling result implies that adding further medium bands to completed JWST deep fields is a roughly time-proportional investment, so the same filter logic could be transplanted to any future survey.
  • If broadband-only claims about 'impossibly early' or 'Lambda-CDM-breaking' galaxies include objects that medium bands later reclassify, some published number densities at $z>10$ may need downward revision.
  • A direct observational test is already available: compare MINERVA's medium-band photo-z against the existing NIRSpec redshifts in these four fields, checking the predicted 5.5% outlier rate without waiting for new spectroscopy.
  • Because the survey spans four independent sightlines, the cosmic-variance error on rare-population number densities should shrink enough to distinguish between competing galaxy-formation models, not just improve individual measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents the MINERVA survey, an approved JWST Cycle-4 treasury program that obtains eight NIRCam medium-band filters and two MIRI filters in four CANDELS fields (UDS, COSMOS, AEGIS, GOODS-N), totaling approximately 542 arcmin^2 of new NIRCam imaging and 275 arcmin^2 of MIRI imaging. It describes the field layouts, exposure times, and legacy supporting data, and uses simulations based on the public UNCOVER/MegaScience and CANUCS/Technicolor catalogs to argue that adding the eight medium bands to a PRIMER-like broadband baseline reduces the photometric redshift scatter (sigma_NMAD) from 3.41% to 0.91% and the outlier fraction from 14.1% to 5.5%, and improves stellar mass scatter by 1.78x and outliers by 2.47x. The paper also places MINERVA in the context of other medium-band surveys and lays out science goals including rare high-redshift galaxies, Balmer-break and quiescent galaxies, extreme emission-line galaxies, stellar mass functions, and resolved stellar population mapping.

Significance. If the quantitative performance gains hold, MINERVA will be a major legacy dataset: a factor of ~7 increase in the area with at least eight NIRCam medium bands, located in the best-studied extragalactic deep fields with extensive spectroscopy. The paper's strengths are its detailed and transparent exposure/footprint tables, the use of public benchmark catalogs and standard tools (EAZY, DENSE BASIS), and the explicit statement of the photometric ground-truth assumption. The main technical claim, that medium bands markedly improve photometric redshifts and stellar masses over broadband-only data, is plausible and consistent with prior medium-band surveys. However, the headline improvement factors are computed against a baseline that omits existing WFC3/IR HST data, so the magnitudes of the gains over actual pre-MINERVA datasets are not yet established as stated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.2.1, Figures 2 and 4, Abstract, Figure 9] The simulated 'PRIMER-like' baseline contains only the ACS filters F435W, F606W, and F814W in addition to the eight JWST PRIMER filters, but every MINERVA field already has WFC3/IR F125W, F140W, and/or F160W imaging (Tables 2-5). The stated improvements (sigma_NMAD 3.41% to 0.91%, outliers 14.1% to 5.5%, and mass scatter/outlier factors 1.78 and 2.47) are therefore gains over this incomplete baseline, not over the actual existing broadband datasets that contain 17-27 HST+JWST filters. The abstract and Figure 9 describe these factors as improvements 'over existing broadband data,' which is likely an overestimate. Please either rerun the simulations including all existing HST filters in the baseline or, at minimum, rephrase the abstract and Figure 9 so that the quoted factors are explicitly attributed to a 'PRIMER-like JWST+ACS baseline' rather than to 'existing broadband data.'
  2. [Tables 3 and 5] The proposal IDs in the coverage tables are internally inconsistent with the text. Table 3 assigns PID 5893 to the COSMOS-Web NIRCam row, but Section 2.1.2 identifies 5893 as the COSMOS-3D survey (PI: Kakiichi) and cites COSMOS-Web as a separate program; Table 5 assigns PID 1181 to the MEOW MIRI row, while Section 2.1.4 states that MEOW is PID 5407 (PI: Leung). Because these tables are the primary record of the survey footprint and legacy data, these entries should be corrected and the remaining rows should be checked for similar copy errors.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2.2.1, footnote 3 and Figure 9] The outlier fraction for the MINERVA-like survey is computed using the PRIMER-like 3*sigma_NMAD threshold rather than the MINERVA-like threshold; this is a reasonable benchmarking choice but should be stated in the main text and in the Figure 9 caption so that readers do not interpret the absolute outlier fraction as the usual self-calibrated value.
  2. [Section 2.2.2] The sentence 'the log(M/M_sun) from the PRIMER-like survey have a sigma_NMAD in delta z/(1+z) that is 0.1110' should read 'sigma_NMAD in log(M/M_sun)'; the misplaced delta z/(1+z) appears to be a copy error from the photometric redshift section.
  3. [Section 2.1.4 and Abstract] The abstract states that MINERVA obtains '2 filter MIRI imaging (F1280W, F1500W)', but Section 2.1.4 and Table 5 show that the GOODS-N MIRI observations use F1280W and F1800W instead of F1500W; the abstract and Section 2.1 should specify this field-dependent filter choice.
  4. [Figure 8 caption] The caption of Figure 8 contains the placeholder '(CITE)' instead of a proper citation for the CANUCS/Technicolor catalog, which should be fixed before publication.
  5. [Section 3.1.4] The text states that MINERVA will cover ~277 arcmin^2 with at least four MIRI filters, whereas Tables 1 and the abstract quote 275 arcmin^2 of MIRI coverage; these numbers should be reconciled.
  6. [Section 2.2.1] There is a typo in the sentence 'This typoe of improvement has also been shown in previous medium band surveys'; it should read 'This type of improvement.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey-simulation claims are forward predictions against external public catalogs, not reductions to their own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative claims—that adding MINERVA's eight medium bands to a PRIMER-like broadband baseline reduces photometric-redshift scatter and outliers and improves stellar-mass precision—are produced by a forward simulation: deep public UNCOVER/MegaScience and CANUCS/Technicolor catalogs are degraded to PRIMER/MINERVA depth, then refit with EAZY and DENSE BASIS, and the resulting values are compared to the original full-depth catalog values. This is not circular: the medium-band information is genuinely absent from the PRIMER-like baseline and present in the MINERVA-like runs, so the improvement is a predicted consequence of adding filters, not a restatement of the input. The ground-truth assumption is explicitly stated and justified by the <5% outlier fraction of those catalogs relative to spectroscopy, which is external, publicly available support rather than a self-referential construction. Although many MINERVA authors contributed to the UNCOVER/MegaScience and CANUCS/Technicolor catalogs, the comparison does not feed back into those catalogs, and the cited validation is independent of the present paper's fitted values. The acknowledged limitation that ground truth could itself be biased is a correctness caveat, not a circularity. The separate concern that the PRIMER-like baseline omits existing WFC3/IR HST filters (F125W, F140W, F160W) is a potential overestimate of the improvement over real pre-MINERVA data, but it is a baseline-fidelity issue, not a case where the prediction is equivalent to its input by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained with respect to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central forecasts rest on the stated ground-truth assumption and on standard fitting tools, both of which are reasonable but not independently verified within this paper. There are no free parameters fitted to data in the simulations, and no new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The UNCOVER/MegaScience and CANUCS/Technicolor photometry and derived zphot and stellar masses represent ground truth.
    Section 2.2 states this assumption explicitly; it is the benchmark against which all simulated improvements are measured.
  • domain assumption Noise can be added to deep photometry to faithfully simulate shallower PRIMER and MINERVA depth.
    Section 2.2.1: 'noise was added to the photometry... such that the photometry has similar depth in each filter to PRIMER'; this assumes a simple noise rescaling with no correlated noise or confusion effects.
  • domain assumption The EAZY template set and DENSE BASIS star formation history parameterizations used in the simulations are adequate for the target galaxy populations.
    Sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.2; results depend on these choices, though they are standard in the field.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MINERVA: A NIRCam Medium Band and MIRI Imaging Survey to Unlock the Hidden Gems of the Distant Universe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KPG5FKIH

@misc{pith2026250719706,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MINERVA: A NIRCam Medium Band and MIRI Imaging Survey to Unlock the Hidden Gems of the Distant Universe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KPG5FKIH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19706}
}
abstract

We present an overview of the MINERVA survey, a 259.8 hour (prime) and 127 hour (parallel) Cycle 4 treasury program on the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). MINERVA is obtaining 8 filter NIRCam medium band imaging (F140M, F162M, F182M, F210M, F250M, F300M, F360M, F460M) and 2 filter MIRI imaging (F1280W, F1500W) in four of the five CANDELS Extragalactic fields: UDS, COSMOS, AEGIS and GOODS-N. These fields were previously observed in Cycle 1 with 7 - 9 NIRCam filters by the PRIMER, CEERS and JADES programs. MINERVA reaches a 5$\sigma$ depth of 28.1 mag in F300M and covers $\sim$ 542 arcmin$^2$, increasing the area of existing JWST medium-band coverage in at least 8 bands by $\sim$ 7$\times$. The MIRI imaging reaches a 5$\sigma$ depth of 23.9 mag in F1280W and covers $\sim$ 275 arcmin$^2$ in at least 2 MIRI filters. When combined with existing imaging, these data will provide a photometric catalog with 20-26 JWST filters (depending on field) and 26-35 filters total, including HST. This paper presents a detailed breakdown of the filter coverage, exposure times, and field layout relative to previous observations, as well as an overview of the primary science goals of the project. These include uncovering the physics of enigmatic sources hiding in current broadband catalogs, improving systematics on stellar mass functions and number densities by factors of $\gtrsim$ 3, and resolved mapping of stellar mass and star formation at 1 $< z <$ 6. When complete, MINERVA will become an integral part of the treasury deep field imaging datasets, significantly improving population studies with well-understood completeness, robust photometric redshifts, stellar masses, and sizes, and facilitating spectroscopic follow up for decades to come.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.19706 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The layout of the MINERVA coverage of the UDS, COSMOS, AEGIS and GOODS-N fields. The background greyscale images are the existing F444W imaging from PRIMER (UDS and COSMOS), CEERS (AEGIS), and JADES (GOODS-N) and includes additional parallel observations. The wider-field F444W COSMOS-Web data are also shown for the COSMOS field. Blue squares are the MINERVA NIRCam coverage in 8 medium bands, and yellow squares are t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left Panels: Photometric redshift results from simulating a PRIMER-like survey by degrading existing deep pho￾tometry from UNCOVER/MegaScience and CANUCS/Technicolor to PRIMER depth and filter coverage (8 JWST broadband filters + 3 HST ACS filters). PRIMER-like is plotted on the Y-axis and the ”ground truth” from UNCOVER/MegaScience and CANUCS/Technicolor is plotted on the X-axis (23 filters). Right Panels: The same… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left Panels: Photometric redshift results from simulating a 10 filter MINERVA survey from UNCOVER/MegaScience and CANUCS/Technicolor to PRIMER/MINERVA depth and including the PRIMER filters (18 JWST filters + 3 HST filters). This is plotted on the Y-axis, and the ”ground truth” from UNCOVER/MegaScience and CANUCS/Technicolor is plotted on the X-axis. In this case, MINERVA’s zphot are estimated to have had a ∼ 1.26x … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left Panels: Stellar mass results from simulating a PRIMER-like survey by degrading existing deep photometry from UNCOVER/MegaScience and CANUCS/Technicolor to PRIMER depth and filter coverage (8 JWST broadband filters + 3 HST ACS filters). Right Panels: The same simul…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left Panels: Stellar mass results from simulating a 10 filter MINERVA survey from UNCOVER/MegaScience and CANUCS/Technicolor to PRIMER/MINERVA depth and including the PRIMER filters (18 JWST filters + 3 HST filters). In this case, MINERVA’s M/M⊙ are estimated to have h…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of various deep/wide JWST imaging surveys. The Y-axis represents the 5σ depth of the surveys in the F300M filter where available, or if unavailable an ex￾trapolation to the equivalent depth using the identical expo￾sure time on the nearest broadband filter. …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Example of constraints on Balmer break galaxies with (red) and without (grey) medium-band data. Galaxy and SED fits taken from the UNCOVER/MegaScience public catalog (Bezanson et al. 2024; Suess et al. 2024), scaled to the depth and filter coverage of PRIMER/MINERVA. W…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Example of constraints on extreme emission line galaxies with (red) and without (grey) medium-band data. Galaxy and SED fits taken from CANUCS/Technicolor (CITE), scaled to the depth and filter coverage of PRIMER/MINERVA. The medium bands allow for signifi￾cantly more …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Random errors (circles) and catastrophic out￾lier fractions (squares) on photometric redshifts (y-axis) and stellar mass (x-axis) when using only broadband NIRCam filters (blue;“PRIMER-like” simulations), as delivered by the MINERVA survey (red; “MINERVA-like” simulati…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Left: Poisson error vs area for z∼6 galaxies with Mstar>1010 M⊙ (blue dashed curve) and z∼4 massive (Mstar>1010.5 M⊙) quiescent galaxies (orange curve). The vertical dashed lines show the combined area in current JWST imaging surveys with MBs (blue) and MINERVA (red).…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: MINERVA filter coverage as a function of redshift for several strong spectral features. We show only the four MIRI filters that are available in all of the MINERVA fields; however, we note that additional MIRI imaging is available in COSMOS, GOODS-N, and AEGIS (see Ta…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Three-color medium-band images of two z ∼ 2.3 galaxies (Hα in green; continuum in blue and red) as well as continuum-subtracted Hα maps following the methods in Lorenz et al. (2025). Data is from UNCOVER/MegaScience, with additional noise added to simulate the shallow…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Type Ia Supernova Candidate at $z\sim4.3$: A Transient Interloper in the Search for $z\sim14$ Galaxies

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A JWST candidate z~14 galaxy is reclassified as a Type Ia supernova at z~4.3, implying SN Ia minimum delay times shorter than 1 Gyr.

  2. Towards Unbreaking the Universe: MINERVA Measurements of Color Gradients in Massive Quiescent Galaxies Can Help Ease Too-Early Star Formation Tensions

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Resolved photometry of four high-redshift quiescent galaxies reveals negative color gradients that lower estimated stellar masses by 0.1 dex relative to slit measurements, reducing model tensions under an age-driven i...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

154 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    C., Helton, J

    Alberts, S., Williams, C. C., Helton, J. M., et al. 2024a, ApJ, 975, 85, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cc

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cc

  2. [2]

    2024b, ApJ, 976, 224, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7396

    Alberts, S., Lyu, J., Shivaei, I., et al. 2024b, ApJ, 976, 224, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7396

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7396

  3. [3]

    R., et al

    Argyriou, I., Glasse, A., Law, D. R., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346489

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346489 2023

  4. [4]

    J., Le F` evre, O., et al

    Arnouts, S., Walcher, C. J., Le F` evre, O., et al. 2007, A&A, 476, 137, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077632 Arrabal Haro, P., Dickinson, M., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2023, Nature, 622, 707, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06521-7

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077632 2007

  5. [5]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 11372, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3902

    Asada, Y., Sawicki, M., Abraham, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 11372, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3902

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3902 2024

  6. [6]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.03124, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.03124 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A

    Asada, Y., Willott, C., Muzzin, A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.03124, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.03124 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.03124 2025

  7. [7]

    E., Kirkpatrick, A., Yang, G., et al

    Backhaus, B. E., Kirkpatrick, A., Yang, G., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.19078, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.19078

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.19078 2025

  8. [8]

    M., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al

    Baker, W. M., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, Astronomy &; Astrophysics, 697, A90, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553766

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553766 2025

Show all 154 references
  1. [9]

    A., Weibel, A., et al

    Barrufet, L., Oesch, P. A., Weibel, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 449, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad947

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    Beckwith, S. V. W., Stiavelli, M., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1729, doi: 10.1086/507302

    2006 doi

  3. [11]

    F., Wolf, C., Meisenheimer, K., et al

    Bell, E. F., Wolf, C., Meisenheimer, K., et al. 2004, ApJ, 608, 752, doi: 10.1086/420778

    2004 doi

  4. [12]

    E., et al

    Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., Whitaker, K. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    2023, MNRAS, 523, 1009, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1014

    Bouwens, R., Illingworth, G., Oesch, P., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 1009, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1014

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    2023, grizli, 1.9.11, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8370018

    Brammer, G. 2023, grizli, 1.9.11, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8370018

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    B., Whitaker, K

    Brammer, G. B., Whitaker, K. E., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2009, ApJL, 706, L173, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/L173

    2009 doi

  8. [16]

    B., van Dokkum, P

    Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G., Franx, M., et al. 2012, ApJS, 200, 13, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/200/2/13

    2012 doi

  9. [17]

    J., Katz, H., Rey, M

    Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., Rey, M. P., & Saxena, A. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 3516, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1579

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    N., van Dokkum, P

    Cardamone, C. N., van Dokkum, P. G., Urry, C. M., et al. 2010, ApJS, 189, 270, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/189/2/270

    2010 doi

  11. [19]

    C., Cullen, F., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., Cullen, F., McLure, R. J., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 325, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2092

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    2024, Nature, 633, 318, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9

    Carniani, S., Hainline, K., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2024, Nature, 633, 318, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    M., Kartaltepe, J

    Casey, C. M., Kartaltepe, J. S., Drakos, N. E., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc2bc

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    2024, ApJ, 972, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88

    Castellano, M., Napolitano, L., Fontana, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 972, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    Chen, N., Motohara, K., Spitler, L., & Malkan, M. A. 2025, ApJ, 981, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adad69

    2025 doi

  16. [24]

    2025, MNRAS, 537, 2535, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf058

    Claeyssens, A., Adamo, A., Messa, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 2535, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf058

    2025 doi

  17. [25]

    J., McLure, R

    Cullen, F., McLeod, D. J., McLure, R. J., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 997, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1211

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 622, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01918-w

    Curtis-Lake, E., Carniani, S., Cameron, A., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 622, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01918-w

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    L., Belli, S., Park, M., et al

    Davies, R. L., Belli, S., Park, M., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 4976, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae327

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    P., et al

    Davis, M., Guhathakurta, P., Konidaris, N. P., et al. 2007, ApJL, 660, L1, doi: 10.1086/517931 26 de Graaff, A., Setton, D. J., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.05683, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.05683 de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al. 2025, A&A, ...

    2007 doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    S., Asada, Y., et al

    Desprez, G., Martis, N. S., Asada, Y., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 2935, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1084

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    T., McLeod, D

    Donnan, C. T., McLeod, D. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 6011, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3472

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    T., McLure, R

    Donnan, C. T., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 3222, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2037

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    J., Hutchings, J

    Doyon, R., Willott, C. J., Hutchings, J. B., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 098001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acd41b

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al

    Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al. 2023a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.02465, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.02465

    doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    J., Johnson, B

    Eisenstein, D. J., Johnson, B. D., Robertson, B., et al. 2023b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.12340, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.12340

    doi

  27. [35]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.01905, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.01905 Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A

    Whitler, L. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.01905, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.01905 Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 3717, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2595

    2024 doi arXiv

  28. [36]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Arrabal Haro, P., et al. 2022, ApJL, 940, L55, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac966e —. 2025, ApJL, 983, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adbbd3

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    S., & Santini, P

    Fontanot, F., De Lucia, G., Monaco, P., Somerville, R. S., & Santini, P. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1776, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15058.x F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., van Dokkum, P. G., Franx, M., et al. 2004, ApJ, 616, 40, doi: 10.1086/424838

    2009

  30. [38]

    B., Casey, C

    Franco, M., Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5e6a

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    2023a, ApJL, 949, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd2d9

    Fujimoto, S., Arrabal Haro, P., Dickinson, M., et al. 2023a, ApJL, 949, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd2d9

    doi

  32. [40]

    L., Burgarella, D., et al

    Fujimoto, S., Finkelstein, S. L., Burgarella, D., et al. 2023b, ApJ, 955, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aceb67

    doi

  33. [41]

    P., Chisholm, J., et al

    Fujimoto, S., Naidu, R. P., Chisholm, J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.11678, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.11678

    2025 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    R., & Mirocha, J

    Furlanetto, S. R., & Mirocha, J. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 5274, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1799

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    2013, ApJS, 206, 10, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/206/2/10

    Galametz, A., Grazian, A., Fontana, A., et al. 2013, ApJS, 206, 10, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/206/2/10

    2013 doi

  36. [44]

    G., Herrera, D., et al

    Gawiser, E., van Dokkum, P. G., Herrera, D., et al. 2006, ApJS, 162, 1, doi: 10.1086/497644

    2006 doi

  37. [45]

    C., Koekemoer, A

    Giavalisco, M., Ferguson, H. C., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2004, ApJL, 600, L93, doi: 10.1086/379232

    2004 doi

  38. [46]

    L., Nelson, E., Williams, C

    Gibson, J. L., Nelson, E., Williams, C. C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad64c2 Gim´ enez-Arteaga, C., Oesch, P. A., Brammer, G. B., et al. 2023, ApJ, 948, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc5ea

    2024 doi

  39. [47]

    2024, Nature, 628, 277, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9

    Glazebrook, K., Nanayakkara, T., Schreiber, C., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 277, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    A., et al

    Gottumukkala, R., Barrufet, L., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 966, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae754

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    A., Kocevski, D

    Grogin, N. A., Kocevski, D. D., Faber, S. M., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 35, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/35

    2011 doi

  42. [50]

    C., Giavalisco, M., et al

    Guo, Y., Ferguson, H. C., Giavalisco, M., et al. 2013, ApJS, 207, 24, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/207/2/24

    2013 doi

  43. [51]

    L., McLure, R

    Hamadouche, M. L., McLure, R. J., Carnall, A. C., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 541, 463, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf971

    2025 doi

  44. [52]

    J., et al

    Harvey, T., Conselice, C., Adams, N. J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.03908, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.03908

    2024 doi arXiv

  45. [53]

    J., Adams, N

    Harvey, T., Conselice, C. J., Adams, N. J., et al. 2025a, ApJ, 978, 89, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8c29 —. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.05244, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.05244

    doi

  46. [54]

    J., et al

    Ilbert, O., Arnouts, S., McCracken, H. J., et al. 2006, A&A, 457, 841, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065138

    2006 doi

  47. [55]

    2017, ApJ, 838, 127, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa63f0

    Iyer, K., & Gawiser, E. 2017, ApJ, 838, 127, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa63f0

    2017 doi

  48. [56]

    G., Gawiser, E., Faber, S

    Iyer, K. G., Gawiser, E., Faber, S. M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 879, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2052

    2019 doi

  49. [57]

    G., Tacchella, S., Genel, S., et al

    Iyer, K. G., Tacchella, S., Genel, S., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 430, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2150

    2020 doi

  50. [58]

    C., Tacchella, S., et al

    Ji, Z., Williams, C. C., Tacchella, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6e7f

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    B., Hodge, J., et al

    Jin, S., Sillassen, N. B., Hodge, J., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, L16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451445

    2024 doi

  52. [60]

    2023, MNRAS, 524, 2594, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3743

    Kannan, R., Springel, V., Hernquist, L., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 2594, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3743

    2023 doi

  53. [61]

    J., Saxena, A., et al

    Katz, H., Cameron, A. J., Saxena, A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.03189, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.03189

    2024 doi arXiv

  54. [62]

    D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0

    2023 doi

  55. [63]

    M., Faber, S

    Koekemoer, A. M., Faber, S. M., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 36, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/36

    2011 doi

  56. [64]

    E., et al

    Kokorev, V., Jin, S., Magdis, G. E., et al. 2023, ApJL, 945, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acbd9d

    2023 doi

  57. [65]

    2025, ApJL, 983, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc458

    Kokorev, V., Atek, H., Chisholm, J., et al. 2025, ApJL, 983, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc458

    2025 doi

  58. [66]

    E., Reddy, N

    Kriek, M., Shapley, A. E., Reddy, N. A., et al. 2015, ApJS, 218, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/15 MINER V A 27 Labb´ e, I., Oesch, P. A., Bouwens, R. J., et al. 2013, ApJL, 777, L19, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/777/2/L19

    2015 doi

  59. [67]

    J., Almaini, O., et al

    Lawrence, A., Warren, S. J., Almaini, O., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1599, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x

    2007

  60. [68]

    2025, ApJ, 984, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc07c

    Lebowitz, S., Hainline, K., Juneau, S., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc07c

    2025 doi

  61. [69]

    Lines, N. E. P., Bowler, R. A. A., Adams, N. J., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 2685, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf627

    2025 doi

  62. [70]

    J., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al

    Looser, T. J., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.02470, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.02470

    2023 doi arXiv

  63. [71]

    A., Kriek, M., et al

    Lorenz, B., Suess, K. A., Kriek, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.10632, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.10632

    2025 doi arXiv

  64. [72]

    M., Koekemoer, A., Coe, D., et al

    Lotz, J. M., Koekemoer, A., Coe, D., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/837/1/97

    2017 doi

  65. [73]

    C., Vijayan, A

    Lovell, C. C., Vijayan, A. P., Thomas, P. A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 2127, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3360

    2021 doi

  66. [74]

    H., et al

    Lyu, J., Alberts, S., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 229, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3643

    2024 doi

  67. [75]

    2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 695, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0558-1

    Man, A., & Belli, S. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 695, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0558-1

    2018 doi

  68. [76]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.01579, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.01579

    Martis, N., Withers, S., Felicioni, G., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.01579, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.01579

    2025 doi arXiv

  69. [77]

    V., de Graaff, A., Franx, M., et al

    Maseda, M. V., de Graaff, A., Franx, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449914

    2024 doi

  70. [78]

    J., Milvang-Jensen, B., Dunlop, J., et al

    McCracken, H. J., Milvang-Jensen, B., Dunlop, J., et al. 2012, A&A, 544, A156, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219507

    2012 doi

  71. [79]

    2024, ApJS, 275, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad7d8f

    Mehta, V., Rafelski, M., Sunnquist, B., et al. 2024, ApJS, 275, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad7d8f

    2024 doi

  72. [80]

    2016, A&A, 590, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527513

    Merlin, E., Amor ´ ın, R., Castellano, M., et al. 2016, A&A, 590, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527513

    2016 doi

  73. [81]

    B., van Dokkum, P., & Mowla, L

    Miller, T. B., van Dokkum, P., & Mowla, L. 2023, ApJ, 945, 155, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbc74

    2023 doi

  74. [82]

    B., Whitaker, K

    Miller, T. B., Whitaker, K. E., Nelson, E. J., et al. 2022, ApJL, 941, L37, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aca675

    2022 doi

  75. [83]

    J., Greene, J

    Mintz, A., Setton, D. J., Greene, J. E., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.16510, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.16510

    2025 doi

  76. [84]

    G., Brammer, G

    Momcheva, I. G., Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2016, ApJS, 225, 27, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/27

    2016 doi

  77. [85]

    M., Finkelstein, S

    Morales, A. M., Finkelstein, S. L., Leung, G. C. K., et al. 2024, ApJL, 964, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad2de4

    2024 doi

  78. [86]

    2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.10521, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.10521

    Morishita, T., Liu, Z., Stiavelli, M., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.10521, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.10521

    doi arXiv

  79. [87]

    A., Kreilgaard, K

    Morishita, T., Mason, C. A., Kreilgaard, K. C., et al. 2025b, ApJ, 983, 152, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbbdc

    doi

  80. [88]

    Z., & Tacchella, S

    Mosleh, M., Hosseinnejad, S., Hosseini-ShahiSavandi, S. Z., & Tacchella, S. 2020, ApJ, 905, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc7cc

    2020 doi

  81. [89]

    P., Oesch, P

    Naidu, R. P., Oesch, P. A., Setton, D. J., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.02794, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2208.02794

    2022 doi arXiv

  82. [90]

    P., Oesch, P

    Naidu, R. P., Oesch, P. A., Brammer, G., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.11263, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.11263

    2025 doi

  83. [91]

    P., Finkelstein, S

    Narayanan, D., Stark, D. P., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb41c

    2025 doi

  84. [92]

    J., van Dokkum, P

    Nelson, E. J., van Dokkum, P. G., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 828, 27, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/27

    2016 doi

  85. [93]

    J., Suess, K

    Nelson, E. J., Suess, K. A., Bezanson, R., et al. 2023, ApJL, 948, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc1e1

    2023 doi

  86. [94]

    A., Brammer, G., Naidu, R

    Oesch, P. A., Brammer, G., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 2864, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2411 ¨Ostlin, G., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Melinder, J., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451723 P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Rinaldi, P., Caputi, K. I., et al. ...

    2023 doi

  87. [95]

    2023, A&A, 675, A164, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245756

    Picouet, V., Arnouts, S., Le Floc’h, E., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A164, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245756

    2023 doi

  88. [96]

    H., Suess, K

    Price, S. H., Suess, K. A., Williams, C. C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada0b1

    2025 doi

  89. [97]

    H., Alberts, S., Shivaei, I., et al

    Rieke, G. H., Alberts, S., Shivaei, I., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6cd2

    2024 doi

  90. [98]

    J., Kelly, D

    Rieke, M. J., Kelly, D. M., Misselt, K., et al. 2023a, PASP, 135, 028001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acac53

    doi

  91. [99]

    J., Robertson, B., Tacchella, S., et al

    Rieke, M. J., Robertson, B., Tacchella, S., et al. 2023b, ApJS, 269, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acf44d

    doi

  92. [100]

    I., Costantin, L., et al

    Rinaldi, P., Caputi, K. I., Costantin, L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdc27

    2023 doi

  93. [101]

    2021, ApJ, 910, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe45b

    Roberts-Borsani, G., Treu, T., Mason, C., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe45b

    2021 doi

  94. [102]

    C., Daddi, E., et al

    Rujopakarn, W., Williams, C. C., Daddi, E., et al. 2023, ApJL, 948, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/accc82

    2023 doi

  95. [103]

    2022, ApJ, 940, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9a48

    Santini, P., Castellano, M., Fontana, A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 940, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9a48

    2022 doi

  96. [104]

    Sarrouh, G. T. E., Muzzin, A., Iyer, K. G., et al. 2024, ApJL, 967, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad43e8

    2024 doi

  97. [105]

    Sarrouh, G. T. E., Asada, Y., Martis, N. S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.21685. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21685

    2025 arXiv

  98. [106]

    2007, ApJS, 172, 1, doi: 10.1086/516585 28

    Scoville, N., Aussel, H., Brusa, M., et al. 2007, ApJS, 172, 1, doi: 10.1086/516585 28

    2007 doi

  99. [107]

    J., Khullar, G., Miller, T

    Setton, D. J., Khullar, G., Miller, T. B., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 145, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6a18

    2024 doi

  100. [108]

    E., Sanders, R

    Shapley, A. E., Sanders, R. L., Topping, M. W., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, 242, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adad68

    2025 doi

  101. [109]

    V., Lange-Vagle, D., Marchesini, D., et al

    Shipley, H. V., Lange-Vagle, D., Marchesini, D., et al. 2018, ApJS, 235, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaacce

    2018 doi

  102. [110]

    2023, MNRAS, 523, 5468, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1749

    Simmonds, C., Tacchella, S., Maseda, M., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 5468, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1749

    2023 doi

  103. [111]

    E., Whitaker, K

    Skelton, R. E., Whitaker, K. E., Momcheva, I. G., et al. 2014, ApJS, 214, 24, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/24

    2014 doi

  104. [112]

    J., Franx, M., et al

    Smit, R., Bouwens, R. J., Franx, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 14, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/14

    2012 doi

  105. [113]

    J., Labb´ e, I., et al

    Smit, R., Bouwens, R. J., Labb´ e, I., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 58, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/58

    2014 doi

  106. [114]

    P., Schenker, M

    Stark, D. P., Schenker, M. A., Ellis, R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 763, 129, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/129

    2013 doi

  107. [115]

    2017, ApJS, 229, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa66cb

    Stefanon, M., Yan, H., Mobasher, B., et al. 2017, ApJS, 229, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa66cb

    2017 doi

  108. [116]

    Straatman, C. M. S., Spitler, L. R., Quadri, R. F., et al. 2016, ApJ, 830, 51, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/51

    2016 doi

  109. [117]

    A., Kriek, M., Price, S

    Suess, K. A., Kriek, M., Price, S. H., & Barro, G. 2019a, ApJ, 877, 103, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1bda —. 2019b, ApJL, 885, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4db3

    doi

  110. [118]

    A., Weaver, J

    Suess, K. A., Weaver, J. R., Price, S. H., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.13132, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.13132

    2024 doi arXiv

  111. [119]

    M., Egami, E., et al

    Sun, F., Helton, J. M., Egami, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 69, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad07e3

    2024 doi

  112. [120]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.15587, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.15587

    Sun, F., Fudamoto, Y., Lin, X., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.15587, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.15587

    2025 doi arXiv

  113. [121]

    M., Renzini, A., et al

    Tacchella, S., Carollo, C. M., Renzini, A., et al. 2015, Science, 348, 314, doi: 10.1126/science.1261094

    2015 doi

  114. [122]

    2025, MNRAS, 540, 851, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf718

    Tacchella, S., McClymont, W., Scholtz, J., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 851, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf718

    2025 doi

  115. [123]

    Tan, V. Y. Y., Muzzin, A., Sarrouh, G. T. E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.07829, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.07829

    2024 doi

  116. [124]

    S., Silverman, J

    Tanaka, T. S., Silverman, J. D., Nakazato, Y., et al. 2024, PASJ, 76, 1323, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psae091

    2024 doi

  117. [125]

    2007, ApJS, 172, 9, doi: 10.1086/516596

    Taniguchi, Y., Scoville, N., Murayama, T., et al. 2007, ApJS, 172, 9, doi: 10.1086/516596

    2007 doi

  118. [126]

    N., Franx, M., van Dokkum, P

    Taylor, E. N., Franx, M., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2009, ApJS, 183, 295, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/183/2/295

    2009 doi

  119. [127]

    R., Quadri, R

    Tomczak, A. R., Quadri, R. F., Tran, K.-V. H., et al. 2014, ApJ, 783, 85, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/85 —. 2016, ApJ, 817, 118, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/118

    2014 doi

  120. [128]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.07163, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.07163

    Trussler, J., Conselice, C., Adams, N., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.07163, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.07163

    2024 doi arXiv

  121. [129]

    Trussler, J. A. A., Conselice, C. J., Adams, N., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 3662, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf213 van der Wel, A., Straughn, A. N., Rix, H. W., et al. 2011, ApJ, 742, 111, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/111

    2025 doi

  122. [130]

    2023, ApJL, 957, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acfe07

    Wang, B., Fujimoto, S., Labb´ e, I., et al. 2023, ApJL, 957, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acfe07

    2023 doi

  123. [131]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.15255, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.15255

    Wang, B., Leja, J., Atek, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.15255, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.15255

    2025 doi arXiv

  124. [132]

    2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.02399, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.02399

    Wang, T., Sun, H., Zhou, L., et al. 2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.02399, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.02399

    doi arXiv

  125. [133]

    I., Sun, L., et al

    Wang, X., Teplitz, H. I., Sun, L., et al. 2024b, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 26, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ad1f6f

    doi

  126. [134]

    2023, mwaskom/seaborn: v0.13.0 (September 2023), v0.13.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.592845

    Waskom, M., Gelbart, M., Botvinnik, O., et al. 2023, mwaskom/seaborn: v0.13.0 (September 2023), v0.13.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.592845

    2023 doi

  127. [135]

    R., Davidzon, I., Toft, S., et al

    Weaver, J. R., Davidzon, I., Toft, S., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A184, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245581

    2023 doi

  128. [136]

    A., Barrufet, L., et al

    Weibel, A., Oesch, P. A., Barrufet, L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 1808, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1891

    2024 doi

  129. [137]

    A., Williams, C

    Weibel, A., Oesch, P. A., Williams, C. C., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.06292, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.06292

    doi arXiv

  130. [138]

    J., et al

    Weibel, A., de Graaff, A., Setton, D. J., et al. 2025b, ApJ, 983, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adab7a

    doi

  131. [139]

    2012, ApJL, 754, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/754/2/L29

    Franx, M. 2012, ApJL, 754, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/754/2/L29

    2012 doi

  132. [140]

    E., Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P

    Whitaker, K. E., Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/86

    2011 doi

  133. [141]

    C., Tacchella, S., Maseda, M

    Williams, C. C., Tacchella, S., Maseda, M. V., et al. 2023, ApJS, 268, 64, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acf130

    2023 doi

  134. [142]

    C., Alberts, S., Ji, Z., et al

    Williams, C. C., Alberts, S., Ji, Z., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3f17

    2024 doi

  135. [143]

    C., Oesch, P

    Williams, C. C., Oesch, P. A., Weibel, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad97bc

    2025 doi

  136. [144]

    E., Blacker, B., Dickinson, M., et al

    Williams, R. E., Blacker, B., Dickinson, M., et al. 1996, AJ, 112, 1335, doi: 10.1086/118105

    1996 doi

  137. [145]

    J., Desprez, G., Asada, Y., et al

    Willott, C. J., Desprez, G., Asada, Y., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 74, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad35bc

    2024 doi

  138. [146]

    M., Wuyts, S., et al

    Wisnioski, E., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., Wuyts, S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 209, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/209

    2015 doi

  139. [147]

    M., Fossati, M., et al

    Wisnioski, E., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., Fossati, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 886, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4db8

    2019 doi

  140. [148]

    2023, ApJL, 958, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad01c0

    Withers, S., Muzzin, A., Ravindranath, S., et al. 2023, ApJL, 958, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad01c0

    2023 doi

  141. [149]

    Wold, I. G. B., Malhotra, S., Rhoads, J. E., Weaver, J. R., & Wang, B. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.19023, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.19023 —. 2025, ApJ, 980, 200, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada8a6 MINER V A 29

    2024 doi arXiv

  142. [150]

    W., et al

    Wolf, C., Meisenheimer, K., Rix, H. W., et al. 2003, A&A, 401, 73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021513

    2003 doi

  143. [151]

    M., et al

    Wuyts, S., Labb´ e, I., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 682, 985, doi: 10.1086/588749

    2008 doi

  144. [152]

    2024, ApJ, 969, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad45fa

    Zaidi, K., Marchesini, D., Papovich, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 969, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad45fa

    2024 doi

  145. [153]

    A., Buat, V., Casey, C

    Zavala, J. A., Buat, V., Casey, C. M., et al. 2023, ApJL, 943, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acacfe

    2023 doi

  146. [154]

    J., Ji, Z., et al

    Zhu, Y., Rieke, M. J., Ji, Z., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.11464, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.11464

    2024 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.