Topological chiral superconductivity from antiferromagnetic correlations in moir\'{e} bands with extreme spin-orbit coupling

Chenyuan Li; Fang Xie; Jennifer Cano; Qimiao Si

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Topological chiral superconductivity from antiferromagnetic correlations in moir\'{e} bands with extreme spin-orbit coupling

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In the strong-coupling regime of twisted bilayer WSe2, the preferred superconducting state is chiral and topological.

desk verdict A credible strong-coupling prediction of chiral topological superconductivity in tWSe2, but the f-only pairing premise is load-bearing and the 'robust' claim is wider than the two parameter regimes studied. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21043 v1 pith:OWTRI6V7 submitted 2025-07-28 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

Chenyuan Li , Fang Xie , Jennifer Cano , Qimiao Si This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.str-el

keywords topologicalchiralsuperconductivitytwistedbilayerWSe2moiréKondolatticet-Jmodelspin-orbitcouplingDzyaloshinskii-MoriyainteractionChernnumberWilsonloop

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what kind of superconducting state twisted bilayer WSe2 forms when the normal state is strongly correlated, as experiments at relatively small twist angles indicate. Using two Kondo-lattice t-J models, one for the regime where the top two moiré bands carry the same Chern number and one where they carry opposite Chern numbers, it finds that the energetically preferred pairing lies in the $^{1,2}E$ representations of the threefold rotation symmetry $C_3$; the order parameter is chiral, with a $p\pm ip$ component intermixed with a $d\pm id$ component. Wilson-loop calculations on the Bogoliubov quasiparticles then show that these chiral states are topological, with a Chern-number change of $\pm 2$ in the same-Chern-number model and $\pm 1$ in the opposite-Chern-number model, and that they carry chiral edge modes. If the paper is right, the superconductivity in this material breaks time-reversal symmetry and is topologically nontrivial, which is directly testable.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a two-orbital Kondo-lattice t-J model: a localized f orbital near half filling hosts spin-valley moments, an itinerant c orbital carries the conduction electrons, and f-c hybridization plus a superexchange interaction among f moments mediate pairing (Eqs. (2)-(4)). The spin-orbit coupling enters through a complex f-orbital hopping phase $\phi_f$, which makes the exchange interaction anisotropic and generates a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya term; pairing enters only in the f sector. The pairing potential is decomposed into the three irreducible representations of $C_3$ through $\gamma_\Gamma(\mathbf{k}) = \cos(k_1+\phi_f) + \omega_\Gamma\cos(k_2+\phi_f) + \omega_\Gamma^2\cos(k_3+\phi_f)$ with $\omega_\Gamma = 1, e^{i2\pi/3}, e^{-i2\pi/3}$, enabling a symmetry-resolved mean-field comparison of the $A_1$, $^{1}E$, and $^{2}E$ channels. Topology is diagnosed with a Wilson loop of the non-Abelian Berry connection of the Bogoliubov quasiparticles, computed in the plane-wave basis because one orbital (the topological power-law orbital) is not exponentially localized; the superconducting Chern number is referenced to the normal-state Chern number.

What would settle it

A direct numerical solution of the full two-orbital Hubbard model at the same parameters (without the t-J reduction) would settle the theoretical claim: if the ground-state pairing is in the $A_1$ channel or a mixed state instead of pure $^{1}E$/$^{2}E$, the central claim fails. Experimentally, the absence of time-reversal-breaking chiral edge modes in a superconducting tWSe2 sample would refute the topological prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that antiferromagnetic correlations among localized spin-valley moments, shaped by extreme spin-orbit coupling, drive chiral topological superconductivity in twisted bilayer WSe2. In both Kondo-lattice t-J models considered, the ground-state energy is minimized by pairing in the two-dimensional $^{1}E$ and $^{2}E$ representations of $C_3$, which are degenerate and preferred over the $A_1$ channel, and full minimization over all three order parameters shows no mixing between them. The pairing functions in these channels combine $p\pm ip$ and $d\pm id$ components, with relative weight set by the spin-orbit-dependent hopping phase $\phi_f$: in the $C=(-1,-1)$ regime the gap phase winds by $4\pi$ around $\Gamma$, giving a Chern-number change of $\pm 2$, while in the $C=(-1,+1)$ regime it winds by $2\pi$, giving $\pm 1$. The paper confirms the topological character by computing Wilson loops of the Bogoliubov quasiparticles in the plane-wave basis and by resolving chiral edge modes in an open-boundary calculation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the low-energy physics of twisted bilayer WSe2 is captured by a two-orbital Kondo-lattice t-J model with a localized f orbital near half filling, an itinerant c orbital, and pairing only in the f sector; if the real material lacks this orbital separation, or if c-orbital pairing or other channels contribute significantly, the predicted $^{1,2}E$ chiral ordering could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The superconductivity of twisted bilayer WSe2 at relatively small twist angles is predicted to be time-reversal breaking and topological, with the $^{1,2}E$ chiral channels preferred over the $A_1$ channel in both band-topology regimes.
The topology differs by regime: a Chern-number change of $\pm 2$ in the same-Chern-number model (predominantly $d\pm id$) and $\pm 1$ in the opposite-Chern-number model (with a substantial $p\pm ip$ component).
Chiral edge modes accompany these states — two per edge in the opposite-Chern case and four expected per edge in the same-Chern case — making them observable with scanning tunneling microscopy.
Because the result does not rely on a van Hove singularity near the Fermi surface or on proximity to an $A_1$ instability, it holds in the strongly correlated normal-state regime where the Mott-Ioffe-Regel limit is reached.
The same framework extends to other moiré systems with nontrivial band topology and strong correlations, such as twisted MoTe2 and rhombohedral graphene.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper's statements, a phase-sensitive probe of the gap function (for example Josephson interferometry or quasiparticle interference) could directly test the predicted $p\pm ip$/d$\pm id$ admixture.
If the prediction is right, tuning the displacement field should shift $\phi_f$ and thereby change the relative $p$ and $d$ weight of the order parameter, giving a control knob the paper notes but does not explore.
The mechanism should transfer to other moiré materials only when their low-energy bands admit the same localized-itinerant split; in systems where both orbitals are itinerant, different pairing symmetries may win.
Probes of time-reversal-symmetry breaking used for bulk cobaltate superconductors could be adapted to tWSe2 to look for the predicted chiral order.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's what I'd tell you before you read it: this is a careful mean-field calculation that produces a concrete, testable claim—tWSe2 in the strong-coupling regime should favor chiral 1,2E pairing (p±ip mixed with d±id) and the resulting superconducting state is topological, with Chern number change ±2 in the C=(-1,-1) model and ±1 in the C=(-1,+1) model. The Wilson-loop analysis is genuinely careful, especially for the non-Wannierizable orbital. But the 'robustly develops' language in the introduction outruns the evidence: the whole calculation sits on the authors' two-orbital Kondo-lattice model, where only the f orbital carries the Hubbard interaction and only f electrons pair. That is a premise inherited from their earlier papers, not something this work justifies.

The genuinely new pieces are the energetic selection of the E channels in both Chern regimes and the Chern-number changes extracted from Wilson loops. The mean-field energetics are standard but presented cleanly; the authors also do the honest thing of subtracting the normal-state winding in the C=(-1,-1) case, where the topological power-law orbital makes the raw winding ambiguous. The edge-mode spectrum in the C=(-1,+1) model gives a useful cross-check of the bulk-boundary correspondence.

The soft spots are real but proportionate. The Schrieffer-Wolff transformation is used up to J/W ~ 0.4, which is not obviously in the perturbative regime; the paper mentions renormalized bandwidths but doesn't quantify higher-order corrections. Pairing is restricted to the f sector, so any c-orbital or f-c pairing that a microscopic Coulomb interaction would produce is excluded by construction. For the C=(-1,-1) model, the c orbital carries the full topological obstruction, so 'localized correlated f plus unaffected itinerant c' is a physical assumption, not a mathematical consequence. If U_cc or U_fc is comparable to U_ff, the favored channel could shift. The phase diagrams cover only two parameter sets, so the 'robust' claim rests on a narrower base than the discussion implies.

None of this makes the central result circular—the chiral state is the output of an energy minimization, not an input. The paper is internally consistent and the presentation is honest about what is assumed. I'd send it to a good referee. The referee should ask for a microscopic estimate of the interaction matrix elements in the two-orbital basis, and for a parameter survey that tests whether the E-channel preference survives when J/W is pushed down or when hybridization is varied. If those checks hold, this is a useful prediction for the tWSe2 experiments; if they don't, the model's range is narrower than claimed.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies two multi-orbital Kondo-lattice t-J models intended to describe the strongly correlated normal state of twisted bilayer WSe2 in two different topological regimes: C=(-1,-1) (same Chern numbers, partial Wannierization with a topological power-law orbital) and C=(-1,+1) (opposite Chern numbers). The models include a localized f orbital with antiferromagnetic exchange, renormalized by spin-orbit coupling into an anisotropic XXZ plus Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya form. The authors perform a mean-field decoupling of the pairing interaction in the three C3 irreps, minimize the ground-state energy, and find that the degenerate 1E/2E channels (chiral p±ip intermixed with d±id) are favored over A1. They compute Wilson loops for the BdG quasiparticles and obtain Chern-number changes of ±2 (C=(-1,-1)) or ±1 (C=(-1,+1)), and identify chiral edge modes. The paper concludes that the superconducting state in tWSe2 is topological chiral and discusses experimental detection and connections to cobaltates.

Significance. If the model accurately captures tWSe2, the result would establish a concrete, strong-coupling mechanism for topological chiral superconductivity in a moiré system, with falsifiable signatures such as time-reversal symmetry breaking and chiral edge modes. The two-model comparison is a valuable robustness check. The paper contains a detailed derivation of the SOC-induced exchange, a transparent mean-field energy comparison, and a careful Wilson-loop treatment for the non-Wannierizable TPLO case, which is methodologically non-trivial. The main caveats are that the results depend on the f-only interaction assumption and on parameter regimes where the Schrieffer-Wolff expansion may be uncontrolled.

major comments (3)

[Eq. (3), Fig. 2(a,d), and SM Sec. B] The superexchange interaction (3) is derived by a second-order Schrieffer-Wolff expansion in the hopping amplitude, which requires |tf|/U to be small. With J = 4|tf|^2/U and f-bandwidth W_f ≈ 6|tf|, the expansion parameter is |tf|/U = (3/2) J/W_f, which is at least (3/2) J/W. The key energy comparison in Fig. 2(a,d) is performed at J/W = 0.40 and 0.42, implying |tf|/U > 0.6, i.e., the expansion is uncontrolled in the very regime where the central claim is demonstrated. The authors should either present the main results at values of J/W for which the Schrieffer-Wolff derivation is controlled, or provide an independent justification (e.g., exact diagonalization of the two-site or finite-cluster Hubbard model) for the t-J form in this regime.
[Eqs. (2)-(4) and SM Sec. C] The effective interaction Hint acts only on the f orbital; the c orbital is treated as non-interacting. The paper justifies this by saying interaction effects are 'expected to be significantly stronger' on the f orbital, but no projection of the continuum-model Coulomb interaction onto the ML-WF/TPLO (or two-orbital) basis is given to establish that U_cc/U_ff and U_fc/U_ff are small. This separation is a physical input, not a consequence of the model construction, and it is load-bearing: in the C=(-1,-1) regime the c (TPLO) orbital carries the full topological obstruction, so if c-orbital or inter-orbital interactions contribute, the pairing may no longer be confined to the f sector and the preferred channel could move away from 1E/2E. The authors should compute (or at minimum estimate) the projected interaction matrix elements to support the f-only assumption, or soften the claim that the calculated chiral state applies to tWSe2.
[SM Sec. D] The topological index for the C=(-1,-1) case is obtained from the Wilson loop of the positive BdG bands in a reference state with both bands fully filled, and the physical Chern number is identified with the change in winding relative to the normal state. Because the positive and negative BdG bands carry opposite Chern numbers in the particle-hole redundant representation, and because the TPLO is not Wannierizable (so the gauge fixing described in SM Sec. D is delicate), the identification of the Wilson-loop winding change with the physical Chern number of the superconducting state should be stated more rigorously. In particular, the authors should specify which Chern number (occupied bands vs. positive bands) is reported, and justify why the remote bands' winding exactly cancels in the difference.

minor comments (3)

[Throughout] There are several typos: 'sufface' in the Introduction, 'dimentional' in the Fig. 3 caption, 'pairng' in the text preceding Fig. 3, 'the the' in SM Sec. D, and 'obstructed' should read 'obstructed' or 'topologically obstructed' in the same section.
[SM Sec. A4] The cross-reference in SM Sec. A4 to 'Fig. 3(f) in the main text' is incorrect: the main-text Fig. 3 has only panels (a) and (b). The intended reference is probably to Fig. 2(f).
[Discussion] The statement in the Discussion that the topological chiral superconductivity is robust 'provided the underlying bands are topological' goes somewhat beyond the evidence, since only two continuum-model parameter regimes are studied. Suggest revising to 'in the two parameter regimes studied here' or adding a more explicit caveat.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the chiral 1,2E pairing preference is the output of mean-field energy minimization, and the Chern-number changes are computed from Bogoliubov Wilson loops; the self-cited two-orbital model construction is code-anchored, not an assumed result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: take the two-orbital Kondo-lattice t-J models constructed by Wannierization of a continuum model (SM Sec. A, Eqs. S7-S8; Refs [11,19]); derive the anisotropic superexchange including the DM term by Schrieffer-Wolff (Eqs. (2)-(3), SM Sec. B); rewrite the pairing interaction as an exact decomposition into C3 irreps (Eq. (5)); minimize the mean-field ground-state energy Eq. (S38) over all pairing amplitudes, including checks against 1E-2E mixing (Fig. 3; SM Sec. C); and obtain the topological index from Wilson loops with the normal-state winding subtracted (SM Sec. D). At no point is the 1,2E preference inserted as an input: the A1 channel is treated on equal footing and found higher in energy across both models and the full (epsilon_D, J) phase diagrams (Fig. 2), and the global minimum is verified not to mix the degenerate channels. The Chern-number changes Delta C = +/-2 (C = (-1,-1)) and +/-1 (C = (-1,+1)) are properties of the self-consistently determined gap, computed numerically, and the agreement with the phase winding of gamma_Gamma(k) (Fig. 4) is a consistency check, not a definition. The one genuine dependency is that the effective models derive from the authors' own prior work (Refs [11,19]); however those constructions are numerical Wannierizations (Wannier90) anchored to an external continuum model whose potentials come from ab initio fits, with assumptions that do not include the present pairing-symmetry result, so the self-citation constitutes independent support rather than a circular premise. The restriction of pairing to the f sector is an explicit modeling assumption (justified by the orbital-separation construction); if the projected Coulomb interaction had comparable U_cc or U_fc terms the preferred channel could shift, which is a correctness or scope risk, not circularity. SM Sec. A4 candidly limits the C = (-1,+1) Kondo-lattice description to finite displacement field, bounding but not invalidating the claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central prediction depends on a chain of modeling assumptions inherited from the authors' prior work (two-orbital Kondo lattice, t-J reduction, mean-field treatment). The only new variational objects are the pairing amplitudes ΔΓ. No independent experimental input is used to set the model parameters; they come from continuum-model fits. The topological index is defined via a subtraction procedure, an extra modeling step.

free parameters (4)

exchange coupling J/W = scanned 0.1-0.5
J = 4|tf|^2/U from Schrieffer-Wolff but treated as a free control parameter in phase diagrams (Fig. 2).
displacement field εD/W = scanned 0-0.5
External vertical field, control parameter in phase diagrams.
chemical potential μ/W = tuned to half-filling
Chosen to maintain half-filling; affects Fermi surface and pairing.
pairing amplitudes ΔΓ = variational
Minimized in mean-field energy Eq. (S38).

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Two-orbital Kondo lattice model captures top two moiré bands of tWSe2
Used throughout; derived from partial Wannierization in SM Sec. A; if this fails the central claim fails.
domain assumption U >> |tf| so Schrieffer-Wolff gives t-J model
Eq. (3) and SM Sec. B; later J/W is scanned to values around 0.4, near the boundary of the expansion.
ad hoc to paper Only opposite-spin pairing terms retained in Eq. (4)
The interaction Eq. (3) contains spin-flip and Ising terms; the paper keeps only the opposite-spin pairing decoupling, ignoring same-spin triplet pairing contributions.
domain assumption Mean-field decoupling of the pairing interaction
Energy comparison Eq. (S38) is mean-field; pairing fluctuations and competing orders (e.g., magnetism) are neglected.
domain assumption Chern number change ΔC defined relative to the normal state is the topological invariant of the SC state
SM Sec. D justifies by adding the winding of all filled bands; this differs from the standard total BdG Chern number and needs further scrutiny.
standard math Class A tenfold classification applies
1,2E states break time reversal; used to say Z-index determines topology.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological chiral superconductivity from antiferromagnetic correlations in moir\'{e} bands with extreme spin-orbit coupling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OWTRI6V7

@misc{pith2026250721043,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological chiral superconductivity from antiferromagnetic correlations in moir\'e bands with extreme spin-orbit coupling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OWTRI6V7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21043}
}

abstract

Motivated by the strong-correlation phenomenology observed near the superconducting phase in twisted bilayer WSe$_2$, we study multi-orbital $t$-$J$ models that are derived from different parameter regimes. The models contain effective antiferromagnetic interactions that are influenced by the strong underlying spin-orbit coupling. The possible superconducting pairing states are investigated in these models. We find that the preferred pairing order parameters are associated with the $^{1,2}E$ representations of the three-fold rotation symmetry operator $C_3$, with the $p\pm i p$ component intermixing with the $d\pm id$ component. The chiral superconducting states are shown to be topological, based on the Wilson loops of the corresponding Bogoliubov quasiparticles. We discuss the implications of our findings for experimental observations, as well as the new connections our results uncover between the moir\'{e} superconductivity and its counterpart in bulk quantum materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.21043 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Superconducting properties of the two models with distinct band topology. (a-c) correspond to the model with Chern [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** shows the ground state energy density Eq. (S38) as a function of the pairing amplitudes in 1E and 2E channels for both models. In each plot, we fix the contribution of channel A1 to 0 and assume that the pairing amplitudes ∆1E and ∆2E are real. While the figure represents only a two-dimentional slice of the full parameter space, comprehensive minimization over all pairing amplitudes ∆A1 , ∆1E and ∆2E consistently… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Phase of the pairing function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Topology and compact molecular orbitals in twisted bilayer WSe$_2$
cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The top two moiré valence bands of twisted WSe2, computed from first principles, carry Chern number C=+1 each and decompose into a compact f-orbital plus a topological c-orbital, giving ab initio parameters for effect...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Nature 556, 43 (2018)

2018
[2]

G. Chen, A. L. Sharpe, P. Gallagher, I. T. Rosen, E. J. Fox, L. Jiang, B. Lyu, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Jung, Z. Shi, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Y. Zhang, and F. Wang, Nature 572, 215 (2019)

work page 2019
[3]

J. M. Park, Y. Cao, L.-Q. Xia, S. Sun, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Nature Materials 21, 877 (2022)

work page 2022
[4]

Y. Xia, Z. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Nature 637, 833 (2025)

work page 2025
[5]

Y. Guo, J. Pack, J. Swann, L. Holtzman, M. Cothrine, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. G. Mandrus, K. Barmak, J. Hone, A. J. Millis, A. Pasupathy, and C. R. Dean, Nature 637, 839 (2025)

work page 2025
[6]

T. Han, Z. Lu, Z. Hadjri, L. Shi, Z. Wu, W. Xu, Y. Yao, A. A. Cotten, O. Sharifi Sedeh, H. Weldeyesus, J. Yang, J. Seo, S. Ye, M. Zhou, H. Liu, G. Shi, Z. Hua, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, P. Xiong, D. M. Zumb¨ uhl, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Nature 10.1038/s41586-025-09169-7 (2025)

doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09169-7 2025
[7]

F. Xu, Z. Sun, J. Li, C. Zheng, C. Xu, J. Gao, T. Jia, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, L. Lu, J. Jia, Z. Shi, S. Jiang, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Lei, X. Liu, and T. Li, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2504.06972 (2025), arXiv:2504.06972 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

arXiv 2025
[8]

Keimer and J

B. Keimer and J. E. Moore, Nature Physics 13, 1045 (2017)

2017

Show all 68 references

[9]

Paschen and Q

S. Paschen and Q. Si, Nature Reviews Physics3, 9 (2021)

2021
[10]

H. Hu, L. Chen, and Q. Si, Nat. Phys. 20, 1863 (2024)

2024
[11]

F. Xie, L. Chen, S. Sur, Y. Fang, J. Cano, and Q. Si, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 136503 (2025)

2025
[12]

S. Kim, J. F. Mendez-Valderrama, X. Wang, and D. Chowdhury, Nature Communications16, 1701 (2025)

2025
[13]

Christos, P

M. Christos, P. M. Bonetti, and M. S. Scheurer, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2407.02393 (2024), arXiv:2407.02393 [cond-mat.supr-con]

2024 arXiv
[14]

Guerci, D

D. Guerci, D. Kaplan, J. Ingham, J. H. Pixley, and A. J. Millis, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.16075 (2024), arXiv:2408.16075 [cond-mat.supr-con]

2024 arXiv
[15]

Tuo, M.-R

C. Tuo, M.-R. Li, Z. Wu, W. Sun, and H. Yao, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2409.06779 (2024), arXiv:2409.06779 [cond-mat.str-el]

2024
[16]

Fischer, L

A. Fischer, L. Klebl, V. Cr´ epel, S. Ryee, A. Rubio, L. Xian, T. O. Wehling, A. Georges, D. M. Kennes, and A. J. Millis, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2412.14296 (2024), arXiv:2412.14296 [cond-mat.str-el]

2024
[17]

A. V. Chubukov and C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. B 111, 014507 (2025)

2025
[18]

Zhu, Y.-Z

J. Zhu, Y.-Z. Chou, M. Xie, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 111, L060501 (2025)

2025
[19]

F. Xie, C. Li, J. Cano, and Q. Si, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.21769 (2025), arXiv:2503.21769 [cond- mat.str-el]

2025 arXiv
[20]

Schrade and L

C. Schrade and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. B 110, 035143 (2024)

2024
[21]

Chen and D

F. Chen and D. N. Sheng, Phys. Rev. B 108, L201110 (2023)

2023
[22]

Zegrodnik and A

M. Zegrodnik and A. Biborski, Phys. Rev. B 108, 064506 (2023)

2023
[23]

Akbar, A

W. Akbar, A. Biborski, L. Rademaker, and M. Zegrod- nik, Phys. Rev. B 110, 064516 (2024)

2024
[24]

Zhou and Y.-H

B. Zhou and Y.-H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 108, 155111 (2023)

2023
[25]

Cr´ epel and A

V. Cr´ epel and A. Millis, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033127 (2024)

2024
[26]

Qin, W.-X

W. Qin, W.-X. Qiu, and F. Wu, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2409.16114 (2024), arXiv:2409.16114 [cond- mat.supr-con]

2024
[27]

F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, I. Martin, and A. H. Mac- Donald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 086402 (2019)

2019
[28]

Devakul, V

T. Devakul, V. Cr´ epel, Y. Zhang, and L. Fu, Nature Communications 12, 6730 (2021)

2021
[29]

See supplemental materials
[30]

J. R. Schrieffer and P. A. Wolff, Phys. Rev. 149, 491 (1966)

1966
[31]

A. H. MacDonald, S. M. Girvin, and D. Yoshioka, Phys. Rev. B 37, 9753 (1988)

1988
[32]

H. Pan, F. Wu, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033087 (2020)

2020
[33]

Goswami, P

P. Goswami, P. Nikolic, and Q. Si, Europhysics Letters 91, 37006 (2010)

2010
[34]

R. Yu, P. Goswami, Q. Si, P. Nikolic, and J.-X. Zhu, Nature Communications 4, 2783 (2013)

2013
[35]

Kotliar, Phys

G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3664 (1988)

1988
[36]

C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016)

2016
[37]

M. Sato, Y. Takahashi, and S. Fujimoto, Phys. Rev. B 82, 134521 (2010)

2010
[38]

A. M. Black-Schaffer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 197001 (2012)

2012
[39]

F. Xie, L. Chen, and Q. Si, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013219 (2024)

2024
[40]

Baskaran, Phys

G. Baskaran, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 097003 (2003), arXiv:cond-mat/0303649 [cond-mat.str-el]

2003 arXiv
[41]

Kumar and B

B. Kumar and B. S. Shastry, Phys. Rev. B 68, 104508 7 (2003)

2003
[42]

Wang, D.-H

Q.-H. Wang, D.-H. Lee, and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 69, 092504 (2004), arXiv:cond-mat/0304377 [cond-mat.supr- con]

2004 arXiv
[43]

Ogata, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 72, 1839 (2003), arXiv:cond-mat/0304405 [cond-mat.supr- con]

M. Ogata, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 72, 1839 (2003), arXiv:cond-mat/0304405 [cond-mat.supr- con]

2003 arXiv
[44]

Watanabe, H

T. Watanabe, H. Yokoyama, Y. Tanaka, J.-i. Inoue, and M. Ogata, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 73, 3404 (2004), arXiv:cond-mat/0408447 [cond-mat.supr- con]

2004 arXiv
[45]

Takada, H

K. Takada, H. Sakurai, E. Takayama-Muromachi, F. Izumi, R. A. Dilanian, and T. Sasaki, Nature 422, 53 (2003)

2003
[46]

Fu and C

L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Phys. Rev. B 76, 045302 (2007)

2007
[47]

T. L. Hughes, E. Prodan, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. B 83, 245132 (2011)

2011
[48]

Marzari and D

N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997)

1997
[49]

Souza, N

I. Souza, N. Marzari, and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 65, 035109 (2001)

2001
[50]

Pizzi, V

G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Bl¨ ugel, F. Freimuth, G. G´ eranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune, J. Iba˜ nez-Azpiroz, H. Lee, J.-M. Lihm, D. Marchand, A. Marrazzo, Y. Mokrousov, J. I. Mustafa, Y. Nohara, Y. Nomura, L. Paulatto, S. Ponc´ e, T. Pon- wei...

2020
[51]

D. J. Thouless, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 17, L325 (1984)

1984
[52]

F. Xie, Y. Fang, L. Chen, J. Cano, and Q. Si, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2407.08920 (2024), arXiv:2407.08920 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

2024 arXiv
[53]

J. Yu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, M. Wang, O. Vafek, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Phys. Rev. B 109, 045147 (2024)

2024
[54]

Koretsune and M

T. Koretsune and M. Ogata, Phys. Rev. B 72, 134513 (2005). 8 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL CONTENTS Acknowledgments 5 References 6 Supplemental Material 8 A. Continuum model and Wannierization 8

2005
[55]

Partial Wannierization 9
[56]

Two-orbital effective model 10
[57]

Derivation of the Kondo lattice t-J model 11

The limit of vanishing displacement field 10 B. Derivation of the Kondo lattice t-J model 11
[58]

Schrieffer-Wolff transformation 11
[59]

Superexchange interaction with spin-orbit coupling 12
[60]

Pairing channels, BdG Hamiltonian and Energetics of the Pairing States 13 D

t-J model description for tWSe 2 13 C. Pairing channels, BdG Hamiltonian and Energetics of the Pairing States 13 D. Determination of topological index 14 A. CONTINUUM MODEL AND W ANNIERIZA TION In this section, we present the continuum model for twisted bilayer transition meta...
[61]

Continuum model The single-valley continuum model [27, 28] provides a simple description of the low-energy electronic structure of twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides. For tWSe 2, the single-valley electronic structure is captured by the following Hamiltonian: h0(...
[62]

partial Wannierization

Partial W annierization We first investigate the band topology in the case shown in Fig. S1(a), in which the top two moir´ e bands have the same valley Chern number C = (−1, −1). The C3z eigenvalues of the top two moir´ e bandscannot be written as the summation of two elementa...
[63]

spinless

Two-orbital effective model We also briefly describe the effective two-orbital model, that is suitable for the parameter regime shown in Fig. S1(b), in which the top two moir´ e bands carry the opposite valley Chern numbers C = (−1, +1). The construction of the two orbital mod...
[64]

pseudo-inversion

The limit of vanishing displacement field The previous discussion about these two effective models are based on space group P 3, which possesses three-fold rotation symmetry. In fact, at zero displacement field limit, the moir´ e continuum model also has an extra C2yT symmetry...
[65]

The derivation is similar to that in Ref

Schrieffer-W olff transformation In this section, we briefly review the derivation of the effectivet-J model from a tight-binding model. The derivation is similar to that in Ref. [31], while here we also take the spin-orbit coupling into account as in Refs. [21, 32]. The found...
[66]

The spin-spin interactions can be derived from a Schrieffer-Wolff transformation of the above Hamiltonian at half-filling

Superexchange interaction with spin-orbit coupling Generally, the t-J model is considered as a low-energy effective theory of a tight-binding model with strong Hubbard interaction. The spin-spin interactions can be derived from a Schrieffer-Wolff transformation of the above Ha...
[67]

A, the top two bands of the continuum model can be well described by compact molecular orbitals, with one orbital near half-filling being more correlated

t-J model description for tWSe 2 As we have already addressed in Sec. A, the top two bands of the continuum model can be well described by compact molecular orbitals, with one orbital near half-filling being more correlated. We denote this orbital as the f orbital, while the m...
[68]

spin-singlet

, (S37) where ωΓ = 1 , ei2π/3, ei4π/3 corresponds to the basis functions of the C3 irreducible representations. Due to the presence of strong spin-orbit coupling (SOC), spin SU(2) symmetry is explicitly broken. As a result, the supercon- ducting order parameter is no longer co...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Nature 556, 43 (2018)

2018

[2] [2]

G. Chen, A. L. Sharpe, P. Gallagher, I. T. Rosen, E. J. Fox, L. Jiang, B. Lyu, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Jung, Z. Shi, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Y. Zhang, and F. Wang, Nature 572, 215 (2019)

work page 2019

[3] [3]

J. M. Park, Y. Cao, L.-Q. Xia, S. Sun, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Nature Materials 21, 877 (2022)

work page 2022

[4] [4]

Y. Xia, Z. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Nature 637, 833 (2025)

work page 2025

[5] [5]

Y. Guo, J. Pack, J. Swann, L. Holtzman, M. Cothrine, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. G. Mandrus, K. Barmak, J. Hone, A. J. Millis, A. Pasupathy, and C. R. Dean, Nature 637, 839 (2025)

work page 2025

[6] [6]

T. Han, Z. Lu, Z. Hadjri, L. Shi, Z. Wu, W. Xu, Y. Yao, A. A. Cotten, O. Sharifi Sedeh, H. Weldeyesus, J. Yang, J. Seo, S. Ye, M. Zhou, H. Liu, G. Shi, Z. Hua, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, P. Xiong, D. M. Zumb¨ uhl, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Nature 10.1038/s41586-025-09169-7 (2025)

doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09169-7 2025

[7] [7]

F. Xu, Z. Sun, J. Li, C. Zheng, C. Xu, J. Gao, T. Jia, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, L. Lu, J. Jia, Z. Shi, S. Jiang, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Lei, X. Liu, and T. Li, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2504.06972 (2025), arXiv:2504.06972 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

arXiv 2025

[8] [8]

Keimer and J

B. Keimer and J. E. Moore, Nature Physics 13, 1045 (2017)

2017