Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Confronting infrared divergences in de Sitter: loops, logarithms and the stochastic formalism

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that light scalars in de Sitter space show no genuine secular growth: loop corrections inherit tree-level time dependence, so the growth stochastic inflation resums is a regularization artifact.

desk verdict A serious challenge to the no-secular-growth orthodoxy, with careful explicit loop computations, but the central multiloop claim is conjectural and the physical IR cutoff is an input, not a result. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21310 v2 pith:TRVTDTYK submitted 2025-07-28 hep-th astro-ph.COhep-ph

Gonzalo A. Palma , Spyros Sypsas , Danilo Tapia This is my paper
classification hep-thastro-ph.COhep-ph MSC 81T2083F05 PACS 04.62.+v98.80.Cq11.10.Gh
keywords infrareddivergencesseculargrowthdeSitterstochasticinflationlightscalarWilsonaxiomsSchwinger-Keldyshrenormalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper challenges a long-standing assumption about quantum field theory in de Sitter space: that light scalar fields with weak non-derivative interactions inevitably develop time-dependent (secular) growth in their correlation functions, amplified by loops and resummed by stochastic inflation. The authors distinguish two cases. A massless field protected by shift symmetry has derivative-only interactions, so the logarithmic growth of the bare two-point function drops out of physical observables. A light field without that symmetry does produce infrared divergences in the massless limit, but the divergences respect the de Sitter isometry group and can be removed order by order using a de Sitter-invariant regularization scheme built on the axioms for momentum-space integration. If the argument holds, secular growth is an artifact of symmetry-breaking cutoffs, and neither massless nor light scalars genuinely grow in time.

What carries the argument

Two mechanisms carry the argument. The first is the axiomatic definition of momentum-space integration\textemdash linearity, scaling under dilations, and translation invariance, which the paper calls Wilson's axioms\textemdash adopted as the unique, de Sitter-invariant way to integrate loop momenta. Under these axioms the anomalous shift term that produces $\ln a(\tau)$ growth in the free two-point function is absent, and internal momentum integrals scale cleanly under dilation, enforcing dilation invariance of $n$-point functions at every loop order. The second mechanism is the decomposition of the closed-time-path (Schwinger\textendash Keldysh) propagators into real and imaginary parts, summarized in two selection rules: every vertex must be touched by at least one imaginary propagator, and no closed loop of purely imaginary propagators exists. Since imaginary parts behave as $\tau_a^3-\tau_b^3$ in the superhorizon limit, they soften each vertex's $\tau_a^{-4}$ integrand into exactly one logarithm $\ln(-\tau f(\mathbf{k}))$; the number of logarithms is therefore the vertex count $V$, independent of loops.

What would settle it

Compute a two-vertex one-loop equal-time correlator (Section IV.E's example) numerically with the infrared divergence regulated by a physical cutoff $\Lambda_{\rm IR}$, and check whether the leading time dependence contains exactly $V=2$ logarithms of $-\tau$ or an extra logarithm contributed by the loop momentum integral near $x\to 1$; one extra logarithm would falsify the structure in Eq.~(109). A second check: the paper's coincident-point two-point function is time-independent, whereas the classical stochastic equation gives $\langle\varphi^2\rangle\propto t$; a lattice simulation of the full interacting field, or long-lived spectator-field statistics in a de Sitter-like epoch, would discriminate between the two.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is a structural result: in the superhorizon limit, the equal-time connected $n$-point correlation function belonging to any diagram topology with $V$ interaction vertices takes the form $D_T(k_1,\ldots,k_n;\tau)=\delta^{(3)}(K)\sum_s A_T^s(k_1,\ldots,k_n)\prod_{a=1}^V\ln\!\big(-\tau\, f_{s,a}(k_1,\ldots,k_n)\big)$, with definite scaling laws for the amplitudes $A_T^s$ and the logarithmic arguments $f_{s,a}$. The number of time-valued logarithms is fixed by the vertex count $V$, not by the loop order. The proof uses the splitting of Schwinger\textendash Keldysh propagators into real and imaginary parts: every non-vanishing diagram must attach at least one imaginary propagator to each vertex, each imaginary part is cubic in the vertex times, and that pairing reduces every vertex time integral to exactly one logarithm. Consequently loop corrections share the time dependence of the corresponding tree-level diagram and cannot grow relative to it, and the infrared divergences carried by loops are de Sitter-invariant, proportional to tree-level structures, and removable by nonlocal counterterms built from the physical infrared scale $\Lambda_{\rm IR}$ that non-derivative interactions introduce.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the infrared scale $\Lambda_{\rm IR}$ introduced by non-derivative interactions is a physical, fixed length rather than a comoving one that stretches with the expansion; the paper argues for this but does not derive it, and if $\Lambda_{\rm IR}$ were comoving the secular growth the paper eliminates would reappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Loop corrections to superhorizon correlation functions cannot grow in time relative to tree-level contributions; if they are small at horizon crossing, they remain small.
  • Infrared divergences of light-scalar theories are de Sitter-invariant and can be renormalized order by order, yielding finite correlators for external momenta above $\Lambda_{\rm IR}$; standard effective-field-theory machinery, not stochastic resummation, handles them.
  • The standard Fokker\textendash Planck equation of stochastic inflation follows only if one replaces the windowed interaction force $\hat{W}[V'(\varphi)]$ by $V'(\varphi_w)$; the correct replacement yields a modified Fokker\textendash Planck equation with a time-dependent effective potential and a corrected diffusion term, Eq.~(201).
  • Equal-time $n$-point functions at coincident points are time-independent constants, and coordinate-space correlators depend only on de Sitter-invariant distances, at every order in perturbation theory.
  • Cumulants of the smoothed field scale like $(\ln a(\tau)/a(\tau_0))^{n-1+V}$, set by the vertex number, so the time evolution of statistics is governed by interactions, not by loop order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the no-secular-growth conclusion holds, the standard stochastic-inflation estimates of primordial black hole abundances and non-Gaussian tails from light spectator fields would need revision: the classical equilibrium $\rho_{\rm eq}\propto e^{-8\pi^2 V(\varphi)/3H^4}$ would in this picture be reached through a different dynamical equation with modified diffusion, changing the tail shape.
  • The physical-versus-comoving regulator choice is in principle observable: the two prescriptions disagree on the time dependence of low-order correlators for momenta in the window $\Lambda_{\rm IR}\ll k\ll H$, so a simulation or measurement sensitive to that window could decide which regulator describes the true infrared dynamics.
  • The paper's conjecture that multi-loop infrared-divergent parts of two-vertex diagrams reduce to tree-level structures, if proven, would promote the no-secular-growth theorem from a one-loop demonstration to an all-orders statement without explicit higher-loop computation.
  • A natural extension is to apply the same axiomatic regularization to graviton or gauge-field loops in de Sitter, where the infrared structure differs, to test whether the absence of secular growth survives beyond the scalar sector.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper argues that infrared effects for light scalar fields in four-dimensional de Sitter space do not produce genuine secular growth. For shift-symmetric massless fields it notes that physical observables are built from derivatives of the two-point function and therefore remain de Sitter invariant. For light fields with non-derivative interactions it asserts that the interactions introduce a physical infrared scale Λ_IR; adopting Wilson's axioms for momentum integration and a de Sitter-invariant physical infrared cutoff, it computes equal-time correlation functions in the Schwinger–Keldysh formalism. The central structural claim is Eq. (109): in the superhorizon limit each diagram topology with V vertices contributes exactly V time logarithms, with no dependence on loop order, so that loop corrections cannot grow relative to tree level. This is verified for one- and two-vertex tree diagrams (Sections IV.B and IV.C), daisy diagrams (Section IV.D), and a two-vertex one-loop diagram (Section IV.E), whose infrared-divergent part reduces to a tree-level propagator factor. Section IV.F discusses renormalization of these divergences, proposes without constructing nonlocal counterterms, and conjectures (Eq. 149) that the two-vertex reduction extends to all loops. Section V revisits stochastic inflation, attributing the standard Fokker–Planck equation to the replacement (185) and to comoving cutoffs, and derives a modified Fokker–Planck equation (Eq. 201).

Significance. Should Eq. (109) hold at arbitrary loop order, the conclusions would be substantial: the standard picture in which infrared loops amplify secular growth would be replaced by a de Sitter-invariant perturbative description, and stochastic inflation would require modification. The concrete computations are careful and internally consistent, notably the one-loop function F_+- (Eqs. 129–144) and its reduction of the infrared divergence to a tree-level propagator factor (Eq. 141), and the split-propagator counting rules of Section III.E and Appendix A are clean and useful. The critique of stochastic inflation is also substantive: Section V.G pinpoints the assumption (185) underlying the standard derivation and shows that a dS-invariant regularization yields a different Fokker–Planck structure (Eq. 201). The paper is honest about its limitations, explicitly labeling Eq. (149) as conjectural and stating in Section IV.F that it does not present the counterterm operator.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV.A and Eq. (109)] The paper's central no-secular-growth conclusion is drawn from Eq. (109), but the general statement is not established. The 'proof' in Section IV.A consists of a counting argument: it asserts that only the |qτ_a| ≪ 1 part of each loop integral can generate logarithms, that configurations with n_I imaginary propagators contribute at order τ^{3(n_I−V)}, and that 'after solving all V time-integrals, the leading term will be a function with an overall factor ∝ [ln(τ/τ_0)]^V'. Each of these steps is asserted rather than derived. In particular, for loop momenta with |qτ| of order one the loop-momentum and vertex-time integrals do not factorize, and the manuscript does not rule out non-factorizable τ-dependence surviving the vertex integrations; the passage from 'each vertex contributes one ln(−τf)' to the product form (109) also requires a statement about the fate of subleading terms after summing the 2^V color assignments. The only nontrivial check beyond tree level is the single two-vertex one-loop diagram of Section IV.E, and the all-order result is explicitly conjectural: Eq. (149) is prefaced by 'it is tempting to conjecture', and the section ends with 'We leave the task of establishing this result more rigorously to future work'. Relatedly, the cancellation of the O(τ^{−n}) terms between Eqs. (123) and (124) is justified by reference to the general split-propagator rules rather than demonstrated. Since the abstract and Section I.C present the vertex-counting structure and the conclusion that loop corrections cannot grow in time as established results, Section IV.A must either be upgraded to a genuine arbitrary-loop derivation (including a treatment of the |qτ| ~ 1 regions) or the claims must be explicitly downgraded to a conjecture supported by one-loop evidence.
  2. [Section I.A and Section II.E] The no-secular-growth conclusion is conditional on the premise, asserted in Section I.A, that non-derivative interactions introduce a physical infrared scale Λ_IR (as opposed to a comoving cutoff), together with the decision in Section II.E to 'simply adopt the validity of Wilson's axioms from the start'. The argument for the physical nature of Λ_IR is qualitative—the equilibrium and self-shielding picture of Fig. 1—and is not derived from the dynamics of V(φ); the mass scale m_IR is then defined in terms of Λ_IR by Eq. (4). The fragility of the premise is visible inside the paper itself: in Section V.D the same theory regulated with a comoving cutoff k_L produces the time-dependent cumulants (177) with σ^2(τ) ∝ ln a(τ), i.e., the standard secular growth, and the difference between (173) and (177) is precisely the regulator choice. Because Wilson's axiom (6) removes by construction the anomalous shift (35) that produces secular growth in Section II.A, the central physical conclusion is an output of the chosen scheme rather than an independently derived property of de Sitter QFT. I raise this as a correctness-risk concern rather than a circularity objection: the paper should either (a) derive Λ_IR as a physical scale from the interacting dynamics (for example from the breakdown scale of the perturbative expansion in V(φ) at p ~ Λ_IR), or (b) identify an in-principle observable, such as a correlation function on a finite-duration inflationary patch, where the two regulators give different predictions and that discriminates the physical- and comoving-cutoff prescriptions. Without one of these, the statement that neither massless nor light scalars exhibit genuine secular growth should be reported as a property of a specific dS-invariant regularization scheme.
  3. [Section IV.F] The claim that infrared divergences 'can be systematically removed order by order' in a de Sitter-invariant scheme is not demonstrated even at one loop. The nonlocal counterterm that would subtract Eq. (147) is not constructed: the text states 'we do not present the explicit form of this operator'; the subtraction (140) is introduced with the caveat that it 'involves a degree of arbitrariness'; and the finite constant c_1 in Eq. (148) is presented as fixed by the requirement that 'physical observables must be independent of such ambiguities', but no condition is stated and no computation is shown that would determine c_1 or prove uniqueness. Moreover the one resummation that is given explicitly, the mass-insertion chain in Eq. (146), is itself acknowledged to omit 'other contributions of the same order in the number of vertices', so it does not constitute the claimed order-by-order renormalization. As it stands, the procedure of Section IV.F specifies neither the counterterm operators nor the renormalization conditions; until it does, the finiteness and uniqueness of the renormalized correlators asserted in Section VI are not established.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eqs. (120)–(121) and Section V.C] The leading logarithms in Eqs. (120)–(121) are written as ln(−τK), where K = k_1 + ... + k_n is the total external momentum whose conservation forces K = 0 through the overall δ^{(3)}(K). The manuscript should state the prescription that defines the logarithm on the support of the delta function, for example that K is evaluated before the delta function is imposed, or that in the cumulant computation (167) one momentum is integrated out and the log arguments become functions of the remaining n−1 momenta.
  2. [Section III.E, Eqs. (90)–(91)] Both displayed equations (90) and (91) are labelled G_R; the second one, which is odd under τ_a ↔ τ_b and contains the sine term, is the function G_I defined in the surrounding text, so the label of Eq. (91) should be corrected.
  3. [Section IV.B] The one-vertex result (121) is obtained after dropping O(τ^0) and higher terms; since Section IV.C takes care to explain the fate of the O(τ^{−n}) terms by cancellation among color assignments, a parallel sentence on the fate of the O(τ^0) terms in the one-vertex case would make the truncation fully systematic.
  4. [Throughout] Minor typographical errors remain: 'If one where to impose the limit' should read 'were' (Section II.D), and 'Consequentially' should read 'Consequently' (Section IV.D).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the no-secular-growth claim is a stated consequence of the physical-IR-scale premise and Wilson axioms, not a hidden restatement; the loop-log theorem has independent content, though the higher-loop extension is explicitly conjectural.

full rationale

The paper is transparent that its central result is conditional on a choice of integration scheme. Section II.E states: 'as far as the computation of equal-time correlation functions is concerned, one may simply adopt the validity of Wilson's axioms from the start,' and Section I.A argues the physical IR scale Lambda_IR 'must be a physical length (as opposed to a comoving length).' The dilation-invariance proof in Section III.C then derives time-independence of coincident correlators. This is a valid derivation from an explicit assumption, not a circular identification: Wilson's axioms are not defined in terms of 'no secular growth,' and the physical-vs-comoving status of Lambda_IR is independently argued from strong-coupling physics, even if debatable. The core loop result Eq. (109) is not obtained by assuming the conclusion: it follows from the split-propagator counting rules (proven in Appendix A) and is checked explicitly at one loop in Section IV.E. Self-citations ([54], [57], [58]) appear in supporting roles—daisy-loop resummation, stochastic derivation—and the central counting argument does not reduce to them. The main caveats are limitations rather than circularity: Section IV.F concedes 'we do not present the explicit form of this operator,' and Eq. (149) says 'it is tempting to conjecture that this pattern persists at higher orders' and 'We leave the task of establishing this result more rigorously to future work.' These omissions weaken the generality of the claimed no-secular-growth theorem but do not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on two key inputs not derived from the theory: the physical nature of the IR cutoff Λ_IR and the validity of Wilson's axioms for loop integrals. The free parameters Λ_IR and its associated mass regulator m_IR set the scale of the theory, while the nonlocal counterterm is postulated but not explicitly built.

free parameters (3)
  • Λ_IR (physical IR cutoff) = not determined; set by strong nonlinearity scale of V(φ)
    Introduced in Section I.A as the physical scale at which non-derivative interactions render the theory strongly nonlinear. It replaces the comoving IR cutoff and is the central regulator making loop integrals dS-invariant. Its value is not computed from the theory; it is an input.
  • m_IR (infrared mass regulator) = m_IR^2 = 3H^2/(2 ln(H/Λ_IR))
    Defined in Eq. (4) and Eq. (48) as a fiducial mass capturing the effect of Λ_IR. It is a derived combination, but effectively a free parameter since Λ_IR is free.
  • c_1 (finite IR constant in F_+-) = unspecified finite constant
    Appears in Eq. (148) as the finite constant capturing the IR sector contribution to the loop function F_+-. It is left arbitrary and would need to be fixed by matching to the nonlocal counterterm, which is not explicitly constructed.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Wilson's axioms for momentum-space integration: linearity, scaling, and translation invariance (Eqs. (5)-(7))
    Adopted in Section I.A and Section II.E as the correct definition of integration, enforcing dilation invariance of loop integrals. A comoving cutoff violates the scaling axiom, so this assumption directly drives the no-secular-growth conclusion.
  • ad hoc to paper Non-derivative interactions introduce a physical, dS-invariant IR scale Λ_IR
    Section I.A states 'non-derivative interactions inevitably introduce a constant physical infrared length scale 2πΛ_IR^{-1}'. This is argued heuristically, not derived, and is the physical input that justifies dS-invariant regularization.
  • domain assumption Weak interaction assumption V(φ)/H^4 << 1 over the field range
    Section I.C uses this to justify treating all couplings, including λ_2, as interactions and to ensure perturbative control. This organizes the perturbation theory and is needed for the vertex-counting argument.
  • domain assumption The quadratic coupling λ_2 is treated as an interaction, not a free mass, regardless of its value
    Section I.C, motivated by the axionic potential example, argues that the theory should be organized with a massless free sector. This choice affects the diagrammatic expansion and the interpretation of loop corrections.
invented entities (1)
  • Nonlocal IR counterterm operator
    purpose: To subtract the IR divergence proportional to ln(H/Λ_IR) in loop diagrams, rendering correlation functions finite and dS-invariant (Section IV.F, Eqs. (147)-(148))
    The paper states that such an operator exists but does not construct it explicitly. It is a postulated object needed to make the central renormalization claim work, and its absence is a notable gap.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Confronting infrared divergences in de Sitter: loops, logarithms and the stochastic formalism." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TRVTDTYK

@misc{pith2026250721310,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Confronting infrared divergences in de Sitter: loops, logarithms and the stochastic formalism},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TRVTDTYK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21310}
}
read the original abstract

A well-established result in quantum field theory in four-dimensional de Sitter space is that the vacuum state of a massless scalar field breaks the de Sitter isometry group, leading to time-dependent (secular) growth in correlation functions computed in inflationary coordinates. This behavior is widely believed to extend to more general theories involving light scalar fields with weak non-derivative interactions. In such cases, secular growth is thought to be further amplified by loop corrections, and the stochastic formalism is often regarded as the appropriate framework to resum these infrared effects. In this article we challenge this prevailing view. A crucial distinction must be made between two cases: a massless scalar field protected by a shift symmetry, and a light scalar without such a symmetry. In the former, the shift symmetry enforces derivative interactions, yielding observables in which secular growth plays no physical role. In the latter, although correlation functions develop infrared divergences in the massless limit, they remain fully invariant under the de Sitter isometry group. We analyze the structure of these divergences arising from loop integrals and show that, in the soft-momentum limit, they do not alter the time dependence of tree-level correlators. In fact, using a de Sitter-invariant renormalization scheme based on Wilson's axioms for integration, these divergences can be systematically removed order by order. We therefore conclude that neither massless nor light scalar fields in de Sitter space exhibit genuine secular growth. We further discuss the implications of these findings for the validity and scope of the stochastic approach to inflation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.21310 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Initially, at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. A representation of de Sitter space covered by con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stochastic inflation from a non-equilibrium renormalization group

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Stochastic inflation is the leading infrared limit of a coarse-grained Schwinger–Keldysh effective theory, and the same Fokker–Planck dynamics follows from a Polchinski-type renormalization-group flow for the reduced ...

  2. The Quantum Mechanics of Rare Events: From Quantum Walks to Stochastic Inflation

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Rare fluctuations in quantum walks are ruled by a measurement-induced relative entropy, and applying this to stochastic inflation yields a steady state that violates detailed balance.

  3. Efficient training of photonic quantum generative models

    quant-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Photonic quantum generative models can be trained classically via maximum mean discrepancy, with deployment corresponding to boson sampling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, The Physical basis for infrared divergences in inflationary quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.11, 2969 (1994)

    1994

  2. [2]

    Brunier, V

    T. Brunier, V. K. Onemli, and R. P. Woodard, Two loop scalar self-mass during inflation, Class. Quant. Grav. 22, 59 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0408080

    arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    V. K. Onemli and R. P. Woodard, Superacceleration from massless, minimally coupledϕ 4, Class. Quant. Grav.19, 4607 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0204065

    arXiv 2002

  4. [4]

    Miao and R

    S.-P. Miao and R. P. Woodard, The Fermion self-energy during inflation, Class. Quant. Grav.23, 1721 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511140

    arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    M. S. Sloth, On the one loop corrections to inflation and the CMB anisotropies, Nucl. Phys. B748, 149 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0604488

    arXiv 2006

  6. [6]

    M. S. Sloth, On the one loop corrections to inflation. II. The Consistency relation, Nucl. Phys. B775, 78 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0612138

    arXiv 2007

  7. [7]

    Riotto and M

    A. Riotto and M. S. Sloth, On Resumming Inflationary Perturbations beyond One-loop, JCAP2008(04), 030, arXiv:0801.1845 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Riotto and M

    A. Riotto and M. S. Sloth, The probability equation for the cosmological comoving curvature perturbation, JCAP10, 003, arXiv:1103.5876 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

Show all 121 references
  1. [9]

    Seery, One-loop corrections to a scalar field during inflation, JCAP2007(11), 025, arXiv:0707.3377 [astro- ph]

    D. Seery, One-loop corrections to a scalar field during inflation, JCAP2007(11), 025, arXiv:0707.3377 [astro- ph]

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Bartolo, S

    N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, M. Pietroni, A. Riotto, and D. Seery, On the Physical Significance of Infra-red Cor- rections to Inflationary Observables, JCAP2008(01), 015, arXiv:0711.4263 [astro-ph]

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Rajaraman, J

    A. Rajaraman, J. Kumar, and L. Leblond, Construct- ing Infrared Finite Propagators in Inflating Space-time, Phys. Rev. D82, 023525 (2010), arXiv:1002.4214 [hep- th]

    2010 arXiv

  4. [12]

    W. Xue, K. Dasgupta, and R. Brandenberger, Cosmo- logical UV/IR Divergences and de Sitter Spacetime, Phys. Rev. D83, 083520 (2011), arXiv:1103.0285 [hep- th]

    2011 arXiv

  5. [13]

    E. T. Akhmedov, F. K. Popov, and V. M. Slepukhin, Infrared dynamics of the massiveϕ4 theory on de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D88, 024021 (2013), arXiv:1303.1068 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  6. [14]

    E. T. Akhmedov, U. Moschella, K. E. Pavlenko, and F. K. Popov, Infrared dynamics of massive scalars from the complementary series in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D96, 025002 (2017), arXiv:1701.07226 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [15]

    E. T. Akhmedov, U. Moschella, and F. K. Popov, Char- acters of different secular effects in various patches of de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D99, 086009 (2019), arXiv:1901.07293 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    E. T. Akhmedov, V. I. Lapushkin, and D. I. Sadekov, Light fields in various patches of de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D111, 125015 (2025), arXiv:2411.11106 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Baumgart and R

    M. Baumgart and R. Sundrum, De Sitter Diagrammar and the Resummation of Time, JHEP2020(07), 119, arXiv:1912.09502 [hep-th]

    1912 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Baumgart and R

    M. Baumgart and R. Sundrum, Manifestly Causal In- In Perturbation Theory about the Interacting Vacuum, JHEP03, 080, arXiv:2010.10785 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Sasaki, H

    M. Sasaki, H. Suzuki, K. Yamamoto, and J. Yokoyama, Superexpansionary divergence: Breakdown of perturba- tive quantum field theory in space-time with accelerated expansion, Class. Quant. Grav.10, L55 (1993)

    1993

  12. [20]

    Bilandzic and T

    A. Bilandzic and T. Prokopec, Quantum radiative cor- rections to slow-roll inflation, Phys. Rev. D76, 103507 (2007), arXiv:0704.1905 [astro-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Weinberg, Quantum contributions to cosmologi- cal correlations, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Quantum contributions to cosmologi- cal correlations, Phys. Rev. D72, 043514 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0506236

    2005 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Weinberg, Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations

    S. Weinberg, Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations. II. Can these corrections become large?, Phys. Rev. D74, 023508 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0605244

    2006 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Senatore and M

    L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, On Loops in Inflation, JHEP2010(12), 008, arXiv:0912.2734 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Senatore and M

    L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, On Loops in Inflation II: IR Effects in Single Clock Inflation, JHEP01, 109, arXiv:1203.6354 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Afshordi and R

    N. Afshordi and R. H. Brandenberger, Super Hubble nonlinear perturbations during inflation, Phys. Rev. D 63, 123505 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0011075

    2001 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Braglia and L

    M. Braglia and L. Pinol, One-loop renormalization of the effective field theory of inflationary fluctuations from gravitational interactions, (2025), arXiv:2504.07926 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  19. [27]

    Braglia and L

    M. Braglia and L. Pinol, Freezing of the renormalized one-loop primordial scalar power spectrum, (2025), arXiv:2504.13136 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  20. [28]

    J. Kong, J. Jeon, and J.-O. Gong, Scalar one-loop ten- sor power spectrum during single-field inflation, (2024), arXiv:2410.16688 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Mirbabayi, Infrared dynamics of a light scalar field in de Sitter, JCAP2020(12), 006, arXiv:1911.00564 [hep-th]

    M. Mirbabayi, Infrared dynamics of a light scalar field in de Sitter, JCAP2020(12), 006, arXiv:1911.00564 [hep-th]

    1911 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Negro and S

    A. Negro and S. P. Patil, Hadamard regularization of the graviton stress tensor, Phys. Rev. D111, 045009 (2025), arXiv:2403.16806 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Kamenshchik and P

    A. Kamenshchik and P. Petriakova, IR finite correla- tion functions in de Sitter space, a smooth massless limit, and an autonomous equation, JHEP04, 127, arXiv:2410.16226 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Kamenshchik and P

    A. Kamenshchik and P. Petriakova, From the Fokker- Planck equation to perturbative QFT’s results in de Sitter space, JHEP08, 063, arXiv:2504.20646 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Seery, Infrared effects in inflationary correlation functions, Class

    D. Seery, Infrared effects in inflationary correlation functions, Class. Quant. Grav.27, 124005 (2010), arXiv:1005.1649 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  26. [34]

    E. T. Akhmedov, Lecture notes on interacting quan- tum fields in de Sitter space, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23, 32 1430001 (2014), arXiv:1309.2557 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Hu, Infrared Behavior of Quantum Fields in In- flationary Cosmology – Issues and Approaches: an overview, (2018), arXiv:1812.11851 [gr-qc]

    B.-L. Hu, Infrared Behavior of Quantum Fields in In- flationary Cosmology – Issues and Approaches: an overview, (2018), arXiv:1812.11851 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Allen, Vacuum States in de Sitter Space, Phys

    B. Allen, Vacuum States in de Sitter Space, Phys. Rev. D32, 3136 (1985)

    1985

  29. [37]

    A. D. Linde, Scalar Field Fluctuations in Expanding Universe and the New Inflationary Universe Scenario, Phys. Lett. B116, 335 (1982)

    1982

  30. [38]

    Vilenkin, Quantum Fluctuations in the New Infla- tionary Universe, Nucl

    A. Vilenkin, Quantum Fluctuations in the New Infla- tionary Universe, Nucl. Phys. B226, 527 (1983)

    1983

  31. [39]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations, Phys. Lett. B117, 175 (1982)

    1982

  32. [40]

    Vilenkin and L

    A. Vilenkin and L. H. Ford, Gravitational Effects upon Cosmological Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. D26, 1231 (1982)

    1982

  33. [41]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Stochastic de Sitter (inflationary) stage in the early universe, Lect. Notes Phys.246, 107 (1986)

    1986

  34. [42]

    A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter back- ground, Phys. Rev. D50, 6357 (1994), arXiv:astro- ph/9407016

    1994

  35. [43]

    Gorbenko and L

    V. Gorbenko and L. Senatore,λϕ 4 in dS (2019), arXiv:1911.00022 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  36. [44]

    N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, Stochastic quantum gravitational inflation, Nucl. Phys. B724, 295 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505115

    2005 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Finelli, G

    F. Finelli, G. Marozzi, A. A. Starobinsky, G. P. Vacca, and G. Venturi, Generation of fluctuations dur- ing inflation: Comparison of stochastic and field- theoretic approaches, Phys. Rev. D79, 044007 (2009), arXiv:0808.1786 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  38. [46]

    C´ espedes, A.-C

    S. C´ espedes, A.-C. Davis, and D.-G. Wang, On the IR divergences in de Sitter space: loops, resummation and the semi-classical wavefunction, JHEP2024(04), 004, arXiv:2311.17990 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Kitamoto, Infrared resummation for derivative in- teractions in de Sitter space, Phys

    H. Kitamoto, Infrared resummation for derivative in- teractions in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D100, 025020 (2019), arXiv:1811.01830 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Honda, R

    M. Honda, R. Jinno, L. Pinol, and K. Tokeshi, Borel re- summation of secular divergences in stochastic inflation, JHEP08, 060, arXiv:2304.02592 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Serreau and R

    J. Serreau and R. Parentani, Nonperturbative resum- mation of de Sitter infrared logarithms in the large-N limit, Phys. Rev. D87, 085012 (2013), arXiv:1302.3262 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Creminelli, Conformal invariance of scalar pertur- bations in inflation, Phys

    P. Creminelli, Conformal invariance of scalar pertur- bations in inflation, Phys. Rev. D85, 041302 (2012), arXiv:1108.0874 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  43. [51]

    A. J. Tolley and N. Turok, Quantization of the mass- less minimally coupled scalar field and the dS / CFT correspondence, (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0108119

    2001 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Arai, Nonperturbative Infrared Effects for Light Scalar Fields in de Sitter Space, Class

    T. Arai, Nonperturbative Infrared Effects for Light Scalar Fields in de Sitter Space, Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 215014 (2012), arXiv:1111.6754 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Allen and A

    B. Allen and A. Folacci, The Massless Minimally Cou- pled Scalar Field in De Sitter Space, Phys. Rev. D35, 3771 (1987)

    1987

  46. [54]

    Huenupi, E

    J. Huenupi, E. Hughes, G. A. Palma, and S. Sypsas, Regularizing infrared divergences in de Sitter spacetime: Loops, dimensional regularization, and cutoffs, Phys. Rev. D110, 123536 (2024), arXiv:2406.07610 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    [54, 57, 58, 61–63, 108–113]

    A physical IR momentum-cutoff has been advocated in Refs. [54, 57, 58, 61–63, 108–113]. Computations of cor- relators via the wavefunction of the universe approach, also support a physical IR regulator [64, 65, 114, 115]. In addition, a de Sitter invariant approach is compatib...

  48. [56]

    K. G. Wilson, Quantum field theory models in less than four-dimensions, Phys. Rev. D7, 2911 (1973)

    1973

  49. [57]

    G. A. Palma and S. Sypsas, Non-Gaussian statistics of de Sitter spectators: A perturbative derivation of stochastic dynamics (2023), arXiv:2309.16474 [hep-th]

    2023

  50. [58]

    G. A. Palma and S. Sypsas, Revisiting stochastic infla- tion with perturbation theory (2023), arXiv:2311.17644 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Spradlin, A

    M. Spradlin, A. Strominger, and A. Volovich, Les Houches lectures on de Sitter space, inLes Houches Summer School: Session 76: Euro Summer School on Unity of Fundamental Physics: Gravity, Gauge Theory and Strings(2001) pp. 423–453, arXiv:hep-th/0110007

    2001 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Cheung, P

    C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, and L. Senatore, The Effective Field Theory of Inflation, JHEP2008(03), 014, arXiv:0709.0293 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    G. A. Palma and W. Riquelme, Axion excursions of the landscape during inflation, Phys. Rev. D96, 023530 (2017), arXiv:1701.07918 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  54. [62]

    X. Chen, G. A. Palma, W. Riquelme, B. Schei- hing Hitschfeld, and S. Sypsas, Landscape tomography through primordial non-Gaussianity, Phys. Rev. D98, 083528 (2018), arXiv:1804.07315 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  55. [63]

    X. Chen, G. A. Palma, B. Scheihing Hitschfeld, and S. Sypsas, Reconstructing the Inflationary Landscape with Cosmological Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161302 (2018), arXiv:1806.05202 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Melville and E

    S. Melville and E. Pajer, Cosmological Cutting Rules, JHEP2021(05), 249, arXiv:2103.09832 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    M. H. G. Lee, C. McCulloch, and E. Pajer, Leading loops in cosmological correlators, JHEP2023(11), 038, arXiv:2305.11228 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    Calzetta and B

    E. Calzetta and B. L. Hu, Closed Time Path Functional Formalism in Curved Space-Time: Application to Cos- mological Back Reaction Problems, Phys. Rev. D35, 495 (1987)

    1987

  59. [67]

    X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, Schwinger- Keldysh Diagrammatics for Primordial Perturbations, JCAP2017(12), 006, arXiv:1703.10166 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    [65, 121]

    Note that the constancy of daisy loops is in agreement with the treatment of Refs. [65, 121]

  61. [69]

    Adshead, R

    P. Adshead, R. Easther, and E. A. Lim, Cosmology With Many Light Scalar Fields: Stochastic Inflation and Loop Corrections, Phys. Rev. D79, 063504 (2009), arXiv:0809.4008 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Enqvist, S

    K. Enqvist, S. Nurmi, D. Podolsky, and G. I. Rigopou- los, On the divergences of inflationary superhorizon perturbations, JCAP2008(04), 025, arXiv:0802.0395 [astro-ph]

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    Fujita, M

    T. Fujita, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tada, and T. Take- 33 sako, A new algorithm for calculating the curvature perturbations in stochastic inflation, JCAP12, 036, arXiv:1308.4754 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    Fujita, M

    T. Fujita, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tada, Non-perturbative approach for curvature perturbations in stochastic δNformalism, JCAP10, 030, arXiv:1405.2187 [astro- ph.CO]

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    Perreault Levasseur, Lagrangian formulation of stochastic inflation: Langevin equations, one-loop cor- rections and a proposed recursive approach, Phys

    L. Perreault Levasseur, Lagrangian formulation of stochastic inflation: Langevin equations, one-loop cor- rections and a proposed recursive approach, Phys. Rev. D88, 083537 (2013), arXiv:1304.6408 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Perreault Levasseur and E

    L. Perreault Levasseur and E. McDonough, Backreac- tion and Stochastic Effects in Single Field Inflation, Phys. Rev. D91, 063513 (2015), arXiv:1409.7399 [hep- th]

    2015 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Mirbabayi, Markovian dynamics in de Sitter, JCAP 09, 038, arXiv:2010.06604 [hep-th]

    M. Mirbabayi, Markovian dynamics in de Sitter, JCAP 09, 038, arXiv:2010.06604 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Cohen and D

    T. Cohen and D. Green, Soft de Sitter Effective Theory, JHEP12, 041, arXiv:2007.03693 [hep-th]

    2007 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Green, EFT for de Sitter Space (2023) arXiv:2210.05820 [hep-th]

    D. Green, EFT for de Sitter Space (2023) arXiv:2210.05820 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Cohen, D

    T. Cohen, D. Green, A. Premkumar, and A. Ridg- way, Stochastic Inflation at NNLO, JHEP09, 159, arXiv:2106.09728 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Cohen, D

    T. Cohen, D. Green, and A. Premkumar, Large devia- tions in the early Universe, Phys. Rev. D107, 083501 (2023), arXiv:2212.02535 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Moss and G

    I. Moss and G. Rigopoulos, Effective long wave- length scalar dynamics in de Sitter, JCAP05, 009, arXiv:1611.07589 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    Ailiga, S

    M. Ailiga, S. Mallik, and G. Narain, Boundary choices and one-loop complex gravitational path integral, Phys. Rev. D111, 123538 (2025), arXiv:2410.19724 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Choudhury and A

    S. Choudhury and A. Mukherjee, Quantum random- ness in the Sky, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 554 (2019), arXiv:1812.04107 [physics.gen-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Li, Stochastic inflation as an open quantum sys- tem, (2025), arXiv:2507.02070 [hep-th]

    Y.-Z. Li, Stochastic inflation as an open quantum sys- tem, (2025), arXiv:2507.02070 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Cruces, Review on Stochastic Approach to Inflation, Universe8, 334 (2022), arXiv:2203.13852 [gr-qc]

    D. Cruces, Review on Stochastic Approach to Inflation, Universe8, 334 (2022), arXiv:2203.13852 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Bhattacharya and S

    S. Bhattacharya and S. Kumar, Yukawa coupling, and inflationary correlation functions for a specta- tor scalar via stochastic spectral expansion, (2025), arXiv:2502.07428 [gr-qc]

    2025

  78. [86]

    Tokuda and T

    J. Tokuda and T. Tanaka, Statistical nature of in- frared dynamics on de Sitter background, JCAP02, 014, arXiv:1708.01734 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    Cruces, C

    D. Cruces, C. Germani, and T. Prokopec, Failure of the stochastic approach to inflation beyond slow-roll, JCAP 03, 048, arXiv:1807.09057 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    Cruces, C

    D. Cruces, C. Germani, A. Nassiri-Rad, and M. Ya- maguchi, Small noise expansion of stochastic inflation, JCAP04, 090, arXiv:2410.17987 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  81. [89]

    [87] for the case of a quasi-de Sitter background

    Similar statements have been made in Ref. [87] for the case of a quasi-de Sitter background

  82. [90]

    Baumann and L

    D. Baumann and L. McAllister,Inflation and String Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathe- matical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2015) arXiv:1404.2601 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  83. [91]

    L. H. Ford, Quantum Instability of De Sitter Space- time, Phys. Rev. D31, 710 (1985)

    1985

  84. [92]

    Antoniadis, J

    I. Antoniadis, J. Iliopoulos, and T. N. Tomaras, Quan- tum Instability of De Sitter Space, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 1319 (1986)

    1986

  85. [93]

    A. M. Polyakov, Infrared instability of the de Sitter space (2012), arXiv:1209.4135 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  86. [94]

    P. R. Anderson and E. Mottola, Quantum vacuum in- stability of “eternal” de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D89, 104039 (2014), arXiv:1310.1963 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Weinberg, Anthropic Bound on the Cosmological Constant, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Anthropic Bound on the Cosmological Constant, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2607 (1987)

    1987

  88. [96]

    Creminelli, S

    P. Creminelli, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis, L. Senatore, and M. Zaldarriaga, The Phase Transition to Slow-roll Eter- nal Inflation, JHEP09, 036, arXiv:0802.1067 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  89. [97]

    J. M. Ezquiaga, J. Garc ´ ıa-Bellido, and V. Vennin, The exponential tail of inflationary fluctuations: con- sequences for primordial black holes, JCAP03, 029, arXiv:1912.05399 [astro-ph.CO]

    1912 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Celoria, P

    M. Celoria, P. Creminelli, G. Tambalo, and V. Yingcharoenrat, Beyond perturbation theory in inflation, JCAP2021(06), 051, arXiv:2103.09244 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  91. [99]

    Hooshangi, M

    S. Hooshangi, M. H. Namjoo, and M. Noorbala, Tail di- versity from inflation, JCAP09, 023, arXiv:2305.19257 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  92. [100]

    Cai, X.-H

    Y.-F. Cai, X.-H. Ma, M. Sasaki, D.-G. Wang, and Z. Zhou, Highly non-Gaussian tails and primordial black holes from single-field inflation, JCAP12, 034, arXiv:2207.11910 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  93. [101]

    Cai, X.-H

    Y.-F. Cai, X.-H. Ma, M. Sasaki, D.-G. Wang, and Z. Zhou, One small step for an inflaton, one giant leap for inflation: A novel non-Gaussian tail and primor- dial black holes, Phys. Lett. B834, 137461 (2022), arXiv:2112.13836 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Hooshangi, M

    S. Hooshangi, M. H. Namjoo, and M. Noorbala, Rare events are nonperturbative: Primordial black holes from heavy-tailed distributions, Phys. Lett. B834, 137400 (2022), arXiv:2112.04520 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Pi and M

    S. Pi and M. Sasaki, Logarithmic Duality of the Curva- ture Perturbation, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 011002 (2023), arXiv:2211.13932 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Vennin,Stochastic inflation and primordial black holes, Ph.D

    V. Vennin,Stochastic inflation and primordial black holes, Ph.D. thesis, U. Paris-Saclay (2020), arXiv:2009.08715 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Achucarro, S

    A. Achucarro, S. Cespedes, A.-C. Davis, and G. A. Palma, The hand-made tail: non-perturbative tails from multifield inflation, JHEP05, 052, arXiv:2112.14712 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  98. [106]

    A. D. Gow, H. Assadullahi, J. H. P. Jackson, K. Koyama, V. Vennin, and D. Wands, Non- perturbative non-Gaussianity and primordial black holes, EPL142, 49001 (2023), arXiv:2211.08348 [astro- ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Cruces, S

    D. Cruces, S. Pi, and M. Sasaki,δnformalism: A new formulation for the probability density of the curvature perturbation, (2025), arXiv:2505.24590 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  100. [108]

    C. P. Burgess, L. Leblond, R. Holman, and S. Shandera, Super-Hubble de Sitter Fluctuations and the Dynamical RG, JCAP2010(03), 033, arXiv:0912.1608 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  101. [109]

    C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, L. Leblond, and S. Shandera, Breakdown of Semiclassical Methods in de Sitter Space, JCAP2010(10), 017, arXiv:1005.3551 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  102. [110]

    Negro and S

    A. Negro and S. P. Patil, An ´Etude on the regu- larization and renormalization of divergences in pri- mordial observables, Riv. Nuovo Cim.47, 179 (2024), arXiv:2402.10008 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Urakawa and T

    Y. Urakawa and T. Tanaka, Influence on obser- 34 vation from IR divergence during inflation: Multi field inflation, Prog. Theor. Phys.122, 1207 (2010), arXiv:0904.4415 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Urakawa and T

    Y. Urakawa and T. Tanaka, Influence on Observation from IR Divergence during Inflation. I., Prog. Theor. Phys.122, 779 (2009), arXiv:0902.3209 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Tanaka and Y

    T. Tanaka and Y. Urakawa, Loops in inflationary corre- lation functions, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 233001 (2013), arXiv:1306.4461 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Anninos, T

    D. Anninos, T. Anous, D. Z. Freedman, and G. Kon- stantinidis, Late-time Structure of the Bunch-Davies De Sitter Wavefunction, JCAP2015(11), 048, arXiv:1406.5490 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  107. [115]

    Huenupi, E

    J. Huenupi, E. Hughes, G. A. Palma, and S. Sypsas, A note on loop resummation in de Sitter spacetime with the wavefunction of the universe approach, (2024), arXiv:2412.01891 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Arkani-Hamed, D

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, H. Lee, and G. L. Pi- mentel, The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Cor- relators from Symmetries and Singularities, JHEP2020 (04), 105, arXiv:1811.00024 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  109. [117]

    Pajer, Building a Boostless Bootstrap for the Bispec- trum, JCAP2021(01), 023, arXiv:2010.12818 [hep-th]

    E. Pajer, Building a Boostless Bootstrap for the Bispec- trum, JCAP2021(01), 023, arXiv:2010.12818 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  110. [118]

    G. L. Pimentel and D.-G. Wang, Boostless cosmologi- cal collider bootstrap, JHEP10, 177, arXiv:2205.00013 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  111. [119]

    D.-G. Wang, G. L. Pimentel, and A. Ach´ ucarro, Boot- strapping multi-field inflation: non-Gaussianities from light scalars revisited, JCAP05, 043, arXiv:2212.14035 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  112. [120]

    Anninos, T

    D. Anninos, T. Anous, and A. Rios Fukelman, De Sitter at all loops: the story of the Schwinger model, JHEP 08, 155, arXiv:2403.16166 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  113. [121]

    Creminelli, S

    P. Creminelli, S. Renaux-Petel, G. Tambalo, and V. Yingcharoenrat, Non-perturbative wavefunction of the universe in inflation with (resonant) features, JHEP 2024(03), 10, arXiv:2401.10212 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.