Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 41 references

Enhancing interfacial thermal conductance in Si/Diamond heterostructures by phonon bridge

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A 40 nm silicon carbide interlayer is predicted to raise Si/diamond interfacial thermal conductance by 46.6 percent.

desk verdict A solid first-principles Monte Carlo study of phonon bridges for Si/diamond; the headline enhancement is a stack-level prediction with a load-bearing thin-layer assumption that needs sensitivity analysis before being taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.22490 v1 pith:AEIJBJC4 submitted 2025-07-30 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph

Ershuai Yin , Qiang Li , Wenzhu Luo , Lei Wang This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph PACS 44.10.+i63.20.-e66.70.-f
keywords interfacialthermalconductancephononbridgeSi/diamondheterostructuresiliconcarbideinterlayerfirst-principlescalculationsMonteCarlotransportdiffusemismatchmodelspectralheat
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a silicon carbide interlayer can act as a phonon bridge between silicon and diamond, fixing the spectral mismatch that makes the bare Si/diamond interface a thermal bottleneck. Its central result is quantitative: at the optimal thickness of 40 nm, the SiC interlayer raises the interfacial thermal conductance from 137.8 to 202.3 W m$^{-2}$ K$^{-1}$, a 46.6% improvement. The reason is that SiC's phonon spectrum overlaps both silicon's low-frequency modes and diamond's mid-to-high-frequency modes, so it opens transmission channels that are closed in the two-layer structure. The paper also argues that the benefit is thickness-dependent, with an optimum set by a trade-off between phonon redistribution inside the interlayer and the added bulk resistance. If the model is right, interlayer selection for chip heat management can be guided by first-principles phonon spectra instead of trial-and-error fabrication.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a three-layer phonon transport model that couples first-principles phonon data to a variance-reduced Monte Carlo solution of the phonon Boltzmann transport equation. Interface transmission is handled by the frequency-resolved Diffuse Mismatch Model, which allows a phonon to cross only when the other side has a mode at the same frequency, with the transmission weight built from the full phonon density of states and group velocities. The named central object is the phonon bridge: an interlayer whose phonon spectrum overlaps both neighboring materials, so frequencies that are blocked at the bare interface become transmissible in two steps. Spectral heat conductance is then used to show which frequency channels are opened by the bridge and which are suppressed.

What would settle it

Measure the interfacial thermal conductance of a planar Si/diamond stack and of an identical stack with a 40 nm SiC interlayer using the same technique, such as time-domain thermoreflectance; finding no roughly 46.6% enhancement, or locating the thickness optimum well away from 40 nm, would refute the claim that this phonon-bridge mechanism controls the interface.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the poor thermal conductance of the Si/diamond interface, which it computes at 137.8 W m$^{-2}$ K$^{-1}$, is not an intrinsic limit but can be overcome by inserting an interlayer whose phonon density of states bridges the two materials. Silicon's phonons lie mainly below 15 THz while diamond carries heat in a broader 15–40 THz range; the bare interface transmits only the small overlapping 9–15 THz window. A 40 nm SiC layer, whose acoustic modes span 2–18 THz and optical modes 21–28 THz, overlaps both sides, and in the three-layer structure it raises the interfacial thermal conductance to 202.3 W m$^{-2}$ K$^{-1}$, a 46.6% enhancement, with new spectral heat conductance appearing in the 15–18 and 21–28 THz bands on the diamond side. The same mechanism explains the thickness dependence: very thin interlayers give phonons too little space for the three-phonon scattering that redistributes them into useful modes, while thick interlayers contribute their own bulk thermal resistance, so an optimum exists at 40 nm. Comparing thirteen candidate interlayers, the paper finds SiC is the best bridge, with AlN second at a 21.9% improvement.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the diffuse mismatch model built from bulk phonon densities of states governs both internal interfaces and that bulk first-principles relaxation times remain valid inside interlayers as thin as 1 nm.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A 40 nm SiC interlayer raises the Si/diamond interfacial thermal conductance from 137.8 to 202.3 W m$^{-2}$ K$^{-1}$, a 46.6% gain, by opening new phonon channels in the 15–18 and 21–28 THz ranges that the bare interface cannot use.
  • The thickness response is non-monotonic: 1 nm SiC lowers conductance below the bilayer value by about 14.2%, while layers beyond 40 nm add bulk resistance and erode the gain, so interlayer thickness must be tuned.
  • The same first-principles-plus-Monte-Carlo three-layer model can be applied to other material pairs to screen interlayer materials before fabrication.
  • Among the thirteen screened interlayers, only α-Si3N4 fails to improve the interface, with SiC best, followed by AlN (+21.9%) and Al0.1Ga0.9N (+21.3%).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If real interfaces behave as the model assumes, the same screening protocol should transfer to other mismatched pairs such as GaN-on-diamond, where a bridging interlayer could remove a large fraction of the device temperature rise.
  • The paper stops at single uniform layers; a natural extension is a graded or multilayer interlayer that steps the phonon spectrum in smaller increments, which could exceed the 46.6% gain by further reducing the impedance mismatch at each interface.
  • The thin-layer result, in which 1 nm of SiC performs worse than no interlayer, is the most sensitive part of the prediction because it relies on bulk relaxation times inside a slab only a few atomic layers thick; direct molecular-dynamics or ultrafast measurements at those thicknesses would test whether the decline is real.
  • The model screens only elastic, diffuse transmission; incorporating inelastic interface scattering would likely raise the absolute ITC values but could change which material is optimal.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper develops a variance-reduced Monte Carlo solution of the phonon Boltzmann transport equation with first-principles phonon dispersions and lifetimes, coupled to the diffuse mismatch model at interfaces, to compute heat transport across Si/interlayer/diamond heterostructures. It predicts that a 40 nm SiC interlayer raises the total thermal conductance of the stack from 137.8 to 202.3 W m-2 K-1, a 46.6% enhancement, and it screens thirteen interlayer materials, finding SiC best and AlN second. The proposed mechanism is that SiC bridges the phonon spectra of Si and diamond, with a thickness trade-off between interface resistance and interlayer bulk resistance.

Significance. If the quantitative predictions hold, the paper would provide a useful parameter-free screening strategy for interlayer materials in semiconductor/diamond thermal management, and it would quantify a design rule for optimum interlayer thickness. The strengths are that the phonon inputs come from first-principles calculations, the bulk thermal conductivities are validated against experiment, and the results for the bare Si/diamond and the isolated Si/SiC and SiC/diamond interfaces are compared with measured values. However, the central quantitative claims depend on assumptions about phonon behavior in nanometer-thick interlayers that are not tested by the validations shown, so the significance is conditional on additional benchmarking or a clear statement of the applicable thickness regime.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (2), and Section 3.4, Fig. 7] The load-bearing thickness dependence is computed by applying bulk phonon dispersions and bulk anharmonic relaxation times to SiC layers as thin as 1 nm, and by using DMM transmission coefficients derived for semi-infinite solids at both internal interfaces. The validations in Fig. 3(a)-(c) are for bulk thermal conductivities, and Fig. 3(d) is for isolated, comparatively thick interfaces; none tests a nanometer-thick embedded layer. In a 1-5 nm slab, phonon wavelengths and mean free paths are comparable to or larger than the layer thickness, so confined modes, interface-coupled lifetimes, and multiple reflections can differ substantially from the bulk picture. Since the thin-layer suppression of the bridge, the 40 nm optimum, and the 46.6% enhancement are emergent from this assumption, the quantitative central claim is not yet supported. A benchmark against atomistic Green's function or NEMD for thin interlayers, or at least a comparison of phonon mean free paths with h and a sensitivity study, would be needed.
  2. [Section 2, computational domain] The uniform 20 x 100 x 20 grid over a total height H = 200 nm + h gives a cell height of about 2 nm for h = 1 nm, so a 1 nm interlayer cannot be resolved by the mesh. Yet Fig. 7(a) reports an ITC of 118.2 W m-2 K-1 at h = 1 nm, and Fig. 8 reports optimal thicknesses of 1 nm for AlxGa1-xN with x = 0.2-0.9. The manuscript should clarify how material layers are assigned to grid cells and should provide a mesh-convergence study for thin interlayers; without this, those specific thin-layer data points are not meaningful.
  3. [Equation (3) and Section 3.4] The quantity reported as 'ITC' for the three-layer structure is defined using the total temperature drop from material 1 to material 3, which includes the two interface drops and the interlayer bulk resistance. Therefore the value 202.3 W m-2 K-1 is the total thermal conductance of the Si/SiC/diamond stack, not an interfacial conductance in the usual sense. The comparison with the two-layer 'ITC' is thus a stack-level comparison. This is acceptable if clearly labeled, but the abstract and conclusions present it as 'interfacial thermal conductance' enhancement, which overstates the result. I recommend renaming the quantity to 'total thermal conductance' or reporting the separate interface and bulk contributions throughout.
  4. [Section 3.5 and Fig. 8] The material ranking for AlxGa1-xN alloys relies on force constants interpolated between AlN and GaN with no direct validation of interface transmission for the alloys. Fig. 3(b) validates the bulk thermal conductivity, but the ITC of alloy interlayers is an emergent prediction of the same DMM treatment. The ranking of alloys, especially the claim that Al0.1Ga0.9N achieves a 21.3% enhancement while higher-x alloys do not, should be presented with appropriate uncertainty or supported by additional tests of the interpolation and DMM assumptions.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typos, including 'Damond' for diamond, 'ilustarted' for illustrated, 'themral' for thermal, 'transfferd' for transferred, and 'rangs' for ranges; these should be corrected in a revision.
  2. [Introduction, reference list] Reference [9] appears in the text as '[9][9,10]'; the duplicated citation should be fixed.
  3. [Section 3.3, text near Fig. 6] The comparison of spectral heat conductance distributions references 'Figures 5(d) and 6(e)', but Fig. 5 has only panels (a) and (b); this should presumably be Fig. 4(d) and Fig. 6(e).
  4. [Section 2, Eq. (1)] The equation for the deviational BTE is garbled in the manuscript text, so the notation for the deviational energy distribution, group velocity, and relaxation time is not fully readable; the equation should be typeset cleanly.
  5. [Section 2, Monte Carlo parameters] The choice of 6 x 10^5 total phonons and the 20 x 100 x 20 grid is stated without a convergence study; at least a brief convergence check in the supplemental material or a sentence reporting grid-independence would strengthen confidence in the reported ITC values.
  6. [Section 3.1, Fig. 3(d)] The comparison with experimental ITC values is described qualitatively as 'closely match' and 'more consistent', but no numerical values or uncertainty ranges are given; adding the computed and measured numbers to the text or table would make the validation more specific.
  7. [Section 2, alloy model] The description of the AlxGa1-xN model as an interpolation of force constants between AlN and GaN is brief; a sentence explaining how mass disorder and its effect on phonon lifetimes are treated would help readers assess the alloy results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the 202.3 W/m²K ITC and 40 nm optimum are emergent outputs of first-principles MC/DMM calculations, not fits; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

I traced the derivation chain. Phonon dispersions and relaxation times are computed from first-principles force constants (VASP/PHONOPY/thirdorder.py/almaBTE), not fitted. Interface transmission uses the standard DMM, Eq. 2, built from bulk densities of states. The Monte Carlo solver is the standard variance-reduced BTE (refs 22,23), and Eq. 3 defines the reported conductance from simulated heat flux and temperature drop. The central claims—137.8 W/m²K for the bilayer, 202.3 W/m²K at 40 nm SiC, the 46.6% enhancement, the 40 nm optimum, and the thirteen-material ranking—are outputs of the simulation. Figure 3 validates bulk thermal conductivities and isolated-interface ITC against experimental data, which is genuine comparison rather than calibration. The only self-citations (refs 9,10) describe prior nanostructure work and an extension of a two-layer solver; they are not used to justify the central result, and no uniqueness theorem or fitted parameter is imported from them. The thin-layer use of bulk DMM and bulk lifetimes is a modeling assumption that could affect the magnitude or optimum, but that is a correctness/validity concern, not circularity: the result is not equal to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical parameter is fitted to the target results. Phonon properties are first-principles outputs; interface transmission uses the unmodified DMM; the ITC values, the 40 nm optimum, and the material ranking are emergent model outputs. The modeling choices (LDA functional, supercell sizes, q-mesh, phonon count, RTA, DMM) are approximations or numerical settings, none calibrated against the central claims. No invented physical entities are introduced; 'phonon bridge' is a descriptive label for the established spectral-matching mechanism.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Interface phonon transmission follows the Diffuse Mismatch Model (Eq. 2) with coefficients computed from bulk phonon densities of states and group velocities at each frequency.
    Used for both internal interfaces in the three-layer stack (Section 2); assumes fully diffuse scattering and ignores inelastic transmission, specularity, and interface disorder, all of which affect real interfaces.
  • domain assumption Bulk first-principles relaxation times describe phonon lifetimes inside interlayers as thin as 1 nm.
    Underpins the Section 3.4 claim that thin interlayers fail to bridge because phonons lack space for three-phonon scattering; few-nm slabs confine phonon modes and change lifetimes, so bulk RTA may not apply.
  • domain assumption AlxGa1-xN alloys are represented by interpolating AlN and GaN force constants in a mixed crystal model.
    Section 2 'mixed crystal model'; neglects explicit alloy disorder beyond the interpolation; validated only against measured thermal conductivity, not against interface behavior.
  • standard math The linearized phonon Boltzmann equation under the relaxation time approximation (Eq. 1) governs steady-state phonon transport.
    Standard basis for variance-reduced phonon Monte Carlo (refs 22, 23); omits coherent and non-linear effects that can matter at few-nanometer scales.
  • domain assumption Three-layer 'ITC' is defined with ΔT equal to the total temperature drop from material 1 to material 3, including interlayer bulk resistance.
    Section 2 (Eq. 3); a definitional choice that makes the 46.6% enhancement a stack-level comparison and complicates comparison with true interface TBC values in the literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhancing interfacial thermal conductance in Si/Diamond heterostructures by phonon bridge." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AEIJBJC4

@misc{pith2026250722490,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhancing interfacial thermal conductance in Si/Diamond heterostructures by phonon bridge},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AEIJBJC4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.22490}
}
read the original abstract

This study investigates the mechanism of enhancing interfacial thermal transport performance in Silicon/Diamond (Si/Diamond) heterostructures using the phonon bridge. A heat transfer model for three-layer heterostructures is developed by combining First-principles calculations with the Monte Carlo method. The temperature distribution, spectral heat conductance, and interfacial thermal conductance are compared for Si/Diamond heterostructures with and without a silicon carbide (SiC) interlayer. The results show that the SiC interlayer effectively bridges low-frequency phonons in Si with mid-to-high-frequency phonons in Diamond, which forms a specific phonon bridge, significantly improving interfacial phonon transport. The influence of SiC interlayer thickness is further studied, revealing a size-dependent phonon bridge enhancement. For thin interlayers, intensified phonon boundary scattering weakens the bridging effect. Conversely, excessively thick interlayers increase the bulk thermal resistance, reducing overall interfacial thermal conductance. Thus, an optimal interlayer thickness exists, identified as 40 nm for SiC. Thirteen candidate interlayer materials, including SiC, AlN, {\alpha}-Si3N4, \b{eta}-Si3N4, and AlxGa1-xN (x ranges from 0.1 to 0.9), are compared at various thicknesses. SiC emerges as the most effective interlayer material, increasing interfacial thermal conductance by 46.6% compared to the bilayer heterostructure. AlN ranks second, improving thermal conductance by 21.9%. These findings provide essential insights into the phonon bridge mechanism at heterogeneous interface thermal transport and offer valuable theoretical guidance for designing heterostructures with enhanced thermal transport performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.22490 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Temperature distribution of the Si/SiC/diamond three-layer heterostructure with a 50 nm SiC interlayer. After completing the Monte Carlo simulation, the temperature and heat flux distributions within the heterostructure can be obtained. The interfacial thermal conductance can then be calculated using the following equation [33,34]: (3) where Q represents the steady-state heat flux across the interface, and ΔT denote… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Fig.6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Fig.7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Fig.8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bonding-Enhanced Interfacial Thermal Transport: Mechanisms, Materials, and Applications

    Zhang X-D, Yang G, Cao B-Y. Bonding-Enhanced Interfacial Thermal Transport: Mechanisms, Materials, and Applications. Adv Mater Interfaces 2022;9:2200078. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202200078

    work page doi:10.1002/admi.202200078 2022

  2. [2]

    Phonon thermal transport and its tunability in GaN for near-junction thermal management of electronics: A review

    Tang D-S, Cao B-Y. Phonon thermal transport and its tunability in GaN for near-junction thermal management of electronics: A review. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2023;200:123497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.123497

    work page arXiv 2023

  3. [4]

    Reducing interfacial thermal resistance by interlayer

    Ma D, Xing Y, Zhang L. Reducing interfacial thermal resistance by interlayer. J Phys Condens Matter 2022;35:053001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aca50a

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aca50a 2022

  4. [5]

    (Ultra)wide bandgap semiconductor heterostructures for electronics cooling

    Cheng Z, Huang Z, Sun J, Wang J, Feng T, Ohnishi K, et al. (Ultra)wide bandgap semiconductor heterostructures for electronics cooling. Appl Phys Rev 2024;11:041324. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0185305

    doi:10.1063/5.0185305 2024

  5. [6]

    Nanostructures Significantly Enhance Thermal Transport across Solid Interfaces

    Lee E, Zhang T, Yoo T, Guo Z, Luo T. Nanostructures Significantly Enhance Thermal Transport across Solid Interfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2016;8:35505–12. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b12947

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.6b12947 2016

  6. [7]

    Tunable Thermal Energy Transport across Diamond Membranes and Diamond–Si Interfaces by Nanoscale Graphoepitaxy

    Cheng Z, Bai T, Shi J, Feng T, Wang Y, Mecklenburg M, et al. Tunable Thermal Energy Transport across Diamond Membranes and Diamond–Si Interfaces by Nanoscale Graphoepitaxy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019;11:18517–27. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b02234

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.9b02234 2019

  7. [8]

    Study of phononic thermal transport across nanostructured interfaces using phonon Monte Carlo method

    Hua Y-C, Cao B-Y. Study of phononic thermal transport across nanostructured interfaces using phonon Monte Carlo method. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2020;154:119762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119762

    work page arXiv 2020

  8. [9]

    Enhancing interfacial thermal transport by nanostructures: Monte Carlo simulations with ab initio phonon properties

    Luo W, Wang N, Lian W, Yin E, Li Q. Enhancing interfacial thermal transport by nanostructures: Monte Carlo simulations with ab initio phonon properties. J Appl Phys 2025;137. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0243745

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0243745 2025

Show all 41 references
  1. [10]

    Mechanisms for enhancing interfacial phonon thermal transport by large-size nanostructures

    Yin E, Li Q, Lian W. Mechanisms for enhancing interfacial phonon thermal transport by large-size nanostructures. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2023;25:3629–38. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CP02887E

    2023 doi

  2. [11]

    Low-Cost Nanostructures from Nanoparticle-Assisted Large-Scale Lithography Significantly Enhance Thermal Energy Transport across Solid Interfaces

    Lee E, Menumerov E, Hughes RA, Neretina S, Luo T. Low-Cost Nanostructures from Nanoparticle-Assisted Large-Scale Lithography Significantly Enhance Thermal Energy Transport across Solid Interfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018;10:34690–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b08180

    2018 doi

  3. [12]

    Review—Integration Methods of GaN and Diamond for Thermal Management Optimization

    Tijent FZ, Faqir M, Chouiyakh H, Essadiqi EH. Review—Integration Methods of GaN and Diamond for Thermal Management Optimization. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol 2021;10:074003. https://doi.org/10.1149/2162-8777/ac12b3

    2021 doi

  4. [13]

    Effect of AlN interlayer thickness on thermal conductances of GaN epilayer and GaN/SiC interface in GaN-on-SiC heterostructures

    Wang L, Zhang Z, Su X, Zhou J, Chen J, Li Z, et al. Effect of AlN interlayer thickness on thermal conductances of GaN epilayer and GaN/SiC interface in GaN-on-SiC heterostructures. Appl Surf Sci 2025;686:162106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.162106

    2025

  5. [14]

    Enhanced Thermal Boundary Conductance across GaN/SiC Interfaces with AlN Transition Layers

    Li R, Hussain K, Liao ME, Huynh K, Hoque MSB, Wyant S, et al. Enhanced Thermal Boundary Conductance across GaN/SiC Interfaces with AlN Transition Layers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 17 2024;16:8109–18. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c16905

    2024 doi

  6. [15]

    Barrier-Layer Optimization for Enhanced GaN-on-Diamond Device Cooling

    Zhou Y, Anaya J, Pomeroy J, Sun H, Gu X, Xie A, et al. Barrier-Layer Optimization for Enhanced GaN-on-Diamond Device Cooling. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 2017:acsami.7b08961

    2017

  7. [16]

    Design rules for interfacial thermal conductance: Building better bridges

    Polanco CA, Rastgarkafshgarkolaei R, Zhang J, Le NQ, Norris PM, Ghosh AW. Design rules for interfacial thermal conductance: Building better bridges. Phys Rev B 2017;95:195303. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.195303

    2017 doi

  8. [17]

    Boosting phonon transport across AlN/SiC interface by fast annealing amorphous layers

    Tian S, Wu T, Hu S, Ma D, Zhang L. Boosting phonon transport across AlN/SiC interface by fast annealing amorphous layers. Appl Phys Lett 2024;124:042202. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0187793

    2024 doi

  9. [18]

    The role of optical phonons in intermediate layer-mediated thermal transport across solid interfaces

    Lee E, Luo T. The role of optical phonons in intermediate layer-mediated thermal transport across solid interfaces. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2017;19:18407–15. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP02982A

    2017 doi

  10. [19]

    Enhancing and tuning phonon transport at vibrationally mismatched solid-solid interfaces

    English TS, Duda JC, Smoyer JL, Jordan DA, Norris PM, Zhigilei LV. Enhancing and tuning phonon transport at vibrationally mismatched solid-solid interfaces. Phys Rev B 2012;85:035438. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.035438

    2012 doi

  11. [20]

    Heat transport exploration through the GaN/diamond interfaces using machine learning potential

    Sun Z, Song Y, Qi Z, Sun X, Liao M, Li R, et al. Heat transport exploration through the GaN/diamond interfaces using machine learning potential. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2025;241:126724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2025.126724

    2025

  12. [21]

    Thermal conductance of nanostructured interfaces from Monte Carlo simulations with ab initio-based phonon properties

    Zhao X, Qian X, Li X, Yang R. Thermal conductance of nanostructured interfaces from Monte Carlo simulations with ab initio-based phonon properties. J Appl Phys 2021;129:215105. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0050175

    2021 doi

  13. [22]

    MCBTE: A variance-reduced Monte Carlo solution of the linearized Boltzmann transport equation for phonons

    Pathak A, Pawnday A, Roy AP, Aref AJ, Dargush GF, Bansal D. MCBTE: A variance-reduced Monte Carlo solution of the linearized Boltzmann transport equation for phonons. Comput Phys Commun 2021;265:108003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108003

    2021

  14. [23]

    Efficient simulation of multidimensional phonon transport using energy-based variance-reduced Monte Carlo formulations

    Péraud J-PM, Hadjiconstantinou NG. Efficient simulation of multidimensional phonon transport using energy-based variance-reduced Monte Carlo formulations. Phys Rev B 2011;84:205331. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.205331

    2011 doi

  15. [24]

    Diffuse mismatch model of thermal boundary conductance using exact phonon dispersion

    Reddy P, Castelino K, Majumdar A. Diffuse mismatch model of thermal boundary conductance using exact phonon dispersion. Appl Phys Lett 2005;87:211908. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2133890

    2005 doi

  16. [25]

    Monte Carlo transient phonon transport in silicon and germanium at nanoscales

    Lacroix D, Joulain K, Lemonnier D. Monte Carlo transient phonon transport in silicon and germanium at nanoscales. Phys Rev B 2005;72:064305. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.064305

    2005 doi

  17. [26]

    Modelling of Thermal Rectification in Si and Ge Thin Films

    Chávez-Ángel E, Sotomayor Torres CM, Alzina F. Modelling of Thermal Rectification in Si and Ge Thin Films. ASME Int. Mech. Eng. Congr. Expo., vol. 56369, American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2013, p. V08CT09A013

    2013

  18. [27]

    Interfacial Phonon Transport Through Si/Ge Multilayer Film Using Monte Carlo Scheme With Spectral Transmissivity

    Ran X, Guo Y, Hu Z, Wang M. Interfacial Phonon Transport Through Si/Ge Multilayer Film Using Monte Carlo Scheme With Spectral Transmissivity. Front Energy Res 2018;6

    2018

  19. [28]

    Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set

    Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci 1996;6:15–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0

    1996 doi

  20. [29]

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using 18 a plane-wave basis set

    Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using 18 a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 1996;54:11169–86. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169

    1996 doi

  21. [30]

    Phonon-phonon interactions in transition metals

    Chaput L, Togo A, Tanaka I, Hug G. Phonon-phonon interactions in transition metals. Phys Rev B 2011;84:094302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.094302

    2011 doi

  22. [31]

    Thermal conductivity of bulk and nanowire Mg${}_{2}$Si${}_{x}$Sn${}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}$ alloys from first principles

    Li W, Lindsay L, Broido DA, Stewart DA, Mingo N. Thermal conductivity of bulk and nanowire Mg${}_{2}$Si${}_{x}$Sn${}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}$ alloys from first principles. Phys Rev B 2012;86:174307. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.174307

    2012 doi

  23. [33]

    Broadly manipulating the interfacial thermal energy transport across the Si/4H-SiC interfaces via nanopatterns

    Xu Y, Wang G, Zhou Y. Broadly manipulating the interfacial thermal energy transport across the Si/4H-SiC interfaces via nanopatterns. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2022;187:122499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.122499

    2022

  24. [35]

    Phonon properties and thermal conductivity from first principles, lattice dynamics, and the Boltzmann transport equation

    McGaughey AJH, Jain A, Kim H-Y, Fu B(傅博). Phonon properties and thermal conductivity from first principles, lattice dynamics, and the Boltzmann transport equation. J Appl Phys 2019;125:011101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5064602

    2019 doi

  25. [36]

    Emerging challenges and materials for thermal management of electronics

    Moore AL, Shi L. Emerging challenges and materials for thermal management of electronics. Mater Today 2014;17:163–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2014.04.003

    2014 doi

  26. [37]

    Phonon-engineered extreme thermal conductivity materials

    Qian X, Zhou J, Chen G. Phonon-engineered extreme thermal conductivity materials. Nat Mater 2021:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-00918-3

    2021 doi

  27. [38]

    First-principles based deep neural network force field for molecular dynamics simulation of N–Ga–Al semiconductors

    Huang Z, Wang Q, Liu X, Liu X. First-principles based deep neural network force field for molecular dynamics simulation of N–Ga–Al semiconductors. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2023;25:2349–58. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CP04697K

    2023 doi

  28. [39]

    Phys Rev Mater 2022;6:104602

    epitaxial layers. Phys Rev Mater 2022;6:104602

    2022

  29. [40]

    Phonon-boundary scattering and thermal transport in AlxGa1−xN: Effect of layer thickness

    Tran DQ, Delgado-Carrascon R, Muth JF, Paskova T, Nawaz M, Darakchieva V, et al. Phonon-boundary scattering and thermal transport in AlxGa1−xN: Effect of layer thickness. Appl Phys Lett 2020;117:252102. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0031404

    2020 doi

  30. [41]

    Theoretical upper limits of the thermal conductivity of Si3N4

    Zhou H, Feng T. Theoretical upper limits of the thermal conductivity of Si3N4. Appl Phys Lett 2023;122:182203. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0149298

    2023 doi

  31. [42]

    A Critical Review of Thermal Boundary Conductance across Wide and Ultrawide Bandgap Semiconductor Interfaces

    Feng T, Zhou H, Cheng Z, Larkin LS, Neupane MR. A Critical Review of Thermal Boundary Conductance across Wide and Ultrawide Bandgap Semiconductor Interfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2023;15:29655–73. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c02507

    2023 doi

  32. [43]

    On the importance of using exact full phonon dispersions for predicting interfacial thermal conductance of layered materials using diffuse mismatch model

    Subramanyan H, Kim K, Lu T, Zhou J, Liu J. On the importance of using exact full phonon dispersions for predicting interfacial thermal conductance of layered materials using diffuse mismatch model. AIP Adv 2019;9:115116. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5121727

    2019 doi

  33. [44]

    Thermal boundary conductance enhancement of the Si/Diamond interface via atomic transition strategy

    Zhao X, Qu Y, Deng N, Yuan J, Hu W, Zhang Z, et al. Thermal boundary conductance enhancement of the Si/Diamond interface via atomic transition strategy. Surf Interfaces 2025;56:105522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2024.105522

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.