Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 49 references

Arrested Ostwald Ripening in Non-Equilibrium Systems

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Random identity swaps or momentum kicks arrest Ostwald ripening and stabilize finite-size droplets across several two-body potentials.

desk verdict A clean minimal demonstration that identity swaps or momentum kicks suppress droplet coarsening in LJ fluids, but the 'Ostwald ripening is absent' claim outruns the evidence: one-microsecond single runs, no error bars, and a conceded eventual-coalescence loophole. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.23580 v1 pith:UGOYT3VR submitted 2025-07-31 physics.bio-ph

Bradley D. Keister , Saeed Najafi , Joan-Emma Shea , Krastan B. Blagoev This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-ph
keywords Ostwaldripeningnon-equilibriumsteadystateliquid-liquidphaseseparationmoleculardynamicsbiomolecularcondensatesarrestedcoarseningtwo-stateparticlemodelLennard-Jonespotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

In a mixture of two particle states that attract each other differently, equilibrium droplets coarsen through Ostwald ripening: small droplets dissolve and feed larger ones. The paper tries to establish that this ripening disappears when the system is driven away from equilibrium by random A↔B identity swaps or by random momentum kicks, and that the effect is generic rather than tied to one interaction potential. Using molecular dynamics with Lennard-Jones, Lennard-Jones-plus-Gaussian double-well, and deeper Lennard-Jones interactions, the authors observe a steady distribution of small droplets under non-equilibrium driving, while the same systems coarsen at equilibrium. If true, the result would identify a simple physical mechanism—local energy input that breaks time-reversal symmetry—by which biomolecular condensates in living cells might avoid ripening and keep a finite size.

What carries the argument

The central object is a two-state particle model with a fixed A:B ratio, where A-A and A-B pairs interact via a Lennard-Jones potential and B-B pairs interact via a more attractive potential, either a double-well Lennard-Jones-plus-Gaussian or a fivefold-deeper Lennard-Jones. An identity swap changes a particle's interaction potential with its neighbors in place. The system is driven out of equilibrium by random A↔B identity swaps at a rate λ, or by random momentum kicks, which inject or remove local energy and break time-reversal symmetry while preserving total energy on average. This local energy transfer is the mechanism that suppresses the Gibbs-Thomson-driven diffusive transport from small to large droplets, leaving coalescence as the only, infrequent, growth route.

What would settle it

Run the same two-state simulations to $10^{7}$ or $10^{8}$ timesteps at fixed nonzero swap rates and track the largest and mean droplet sizes; if growth resumes with a power-law or logarithmic time dependence after the plateau, the arrest is a finite-time effect. Also check the plateau droplet size in boxes of increasing volume: if the plateau grows with system size, the apparent arrest may be a finite-size artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At equilibrium, droplets of the more-attractive B particles grow over time by coarsening and coalescence. When the system is held out of equilibrium—by exchanging the identities of 10% of A and B particles every 1,000 timesteps, or by giving random momentum kicks to 30% of particles—the droplet-size distribution stops changing and small droplets persist for the full one-million-step run. The paper reports this arrest for the modified Lennard-Jones potential, the Lennard-Jones-plus-Gaussian double-well potential, and the fivefold-deep Lennard-Jones potential, and concludes that across all interaction potentials considered, Ostwald ripening is absent away from equilibrium. The physical picture offered is that local energy deposition or extraction destabilizes large droplets, which contain many bulk particles, more than intermediate-sized droplets, so the thermodynamic driving force for ripening is neutralized.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the flat droplet-size plateau seen over one million timesteps is a genuine non-equilibrium steady state rather than a slow transient; the simulations last about one microsecond, so if ripening resumes on longer timescales the central claim collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Droplet size can be tuned by the swap rate: increasing λ gives progressively smaller largest-droplet sizes, with no ripening at nonzero rates.
  • Because the arrest appears for all tested B-B potentials, sustained local energy input, not the specific chemistry of the interactions, is the essential ingredient for suppressing Ostwald ripening.
  • Coalescence remains the only growth mechanism in the non-equilibrium steady state, so any eventual coarsening is slow and occurs on timescales long compared with physiological ones.
  • Momentum kicks reproduce the same arrest in a single-state system, so the mechanism does not require internal states or potential switching; any form of random local energy transfer suffices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the arrest is generic, then any sustained source of random energy input, not just ATP-driven enzymatic cycles, should stabilize finite-size condensates; this could be tested in vitro by adding an enzymatic fuel that maintains a non-equilibrium steady state.
  • The one-million-step horizon leaves open whether the plateau is a true steady state; a direct test is to run much longer and see whether the largest-droplet growth curve remains flat, and to check whether the plateau size depends on box size.
  • The simulations suggest a mean-field prediction that the plateau droplet size should scale with the swap rate and the curvature contribution to chemical potential; an analytic reaction-diffusion model with random state switching could be compared with the measured size distributions.
  • The mechanism may extend to other phase-separating mixtures, such as colloid-polymer systems, alloys, or emulsions, wherever random compositional or kinetic changes are present, though the paper only simulates the specific Lennard-Jones-type models.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports molecular dynamics simulations of a binary mixture of particles in states A and B, interacting through Lennard-Jones-type pair potentials. The B-B interaction is either a Lennard-Jones potential plus a shifted Gaussian (the 'double-well' model) or five times the A-A Lennard-Jones potential. The system is driven out of equilibrium either by randomly exchanging A-B identities at fixed composition or by random momentum kicks to a fraction of particles. In the equilibrium (no-swap) limit the largest droplet grows and the droplet-size distribution coarsens; at nonzero swap rates or with momentum kicks, the largest droplet size appears to plateau after a few hundred thousand steps and a stable distribution of small droplets is reported. The authors conclude that Ostwald ripening is suppressed or absent away from equilibrium and propose this as a mechanism for stabilizing biomolecular condensates. The paper contains no analytical theory; the evidence is entirely from LAMMPS simulations, with one million timesteps per run mapped to roughly one microsecond of physical time.

Significance. If the reported plateau is a genuine non-equilibrium steady state, the result would be significant: it would support a generic, potential-independent mechanism by which local energy input arrests Ostwald ripening, relevant to active emulsions and biological condensates. The study's strengths are the breadth of interaction potentials considered (Gaussian-modified Lennard-Jones with three Gaussian centers, a deeper Lennard-Jones potential) and the use of two distinct driving protocols (identity swaps and momentum kicks). The paper does not provide code or raw data, but the model is simple enough to reproduce. The significance is conditional on establishing that the observed plateau is a true steady state and not a slowly coarsening transient, which the current single-run, one-microsecond simulations do not yet establish.

major comments (4)
  1. [Figs. 5-6; Eq. (9); Conclusions] The central claim that Ostwald ripening is 'absent' or 'arrested' rests on a single one-million-step trajectory for each parameter set, corresponding to about one microsecond of physical time as stated. No replicate runs, error bars, or quantitative stationarity test are reported, and the Conclusions explicitly concede that 'eventual coarsening occurs through rare droplet coalescence.' With roughly 8,100 B particles, coalescence-limited ripening can naturally be slower than the simulated time horizon, so the plateau in the largest droplet size could be a pre-asymptotic transient rather than a non-equilibrium steady state. The manuscript needs multiple independent seeds, longer simulations or a stationarity criterion (e.g., no drift in the droplet-size distribution over several droplet turnover times), and ideally a measurement of the monomer evaporation/condensation flux to distinguish slowed ripening from true arrest.
  2. [Figs. 3-6; Analysis and Conclusions] The paper does not operationally distinguish 'no growth of the largest droplet' from 'Ostwald ripening is absent.' The authors themselves describe the growth in the no-swap control as 'likely due to coalescence,' and at finite swap rates the largest droplet could remain nearly constant even if Ostwald ripening continues to transfer material from smaller to larger droplets. To support the title's claim, the analysis should separate coalescence from Ostwald ripening, for example by tracking individual droplet volumes, monitoring the evolution of the full droplet-size distribution against Lifshitz-Slyozov scaling, or measuring monomer exchange between droplets. Without such an analysis, the observations are consistent with 'slowed ripening,' not uniquely with 'arrested Ostwald ripening.'
  3. [Models, Eq. (2), Figs. 5-6] The robustness claim 'across all interaction potentials considered' is based on two functional forms: the Lennard-Jones plus shifted Gaussian with H = -0.7 and three values of a, and the five-times Lennard-Jones potential, plus the momentum-kick protocol. The Gaussian parameters are explicitly chosen so that 'the special results ... do not occur' otherwise, which suggests the arrest may be parameter-sensitive. A systematic scan over H, delta, rho*, T*, or the B-particle fraction would be needed to substantiate the claim that arrested ripening is generic. At minimum, the abstract and conclusions should temper 'in all cases' to 'in the parameter regimes studied.'
  4. [Models; 'randomly exchanging identities' paragraph] The protocol is asserted to produce a non-equilibrium steady state because A-B transitions occur at equal rates, but the composition is held fixed by construction and the energy exchange during swaps is stated to average to zero. The manuscript also says the simulations run 'under constant number, volume, and energy (NVE) conditions, with a Langevin thermostat applied,' which is internally inconsistent because a Langevin thermostat exchanges energy. Since the paper's central comparison is equilibrium versus non-equilibrium, the authors should provide a quantitative check of non-equilibrium behavior, such as broken detailed balance in particle trajectories, non-zero entropy production, or a measured distribution that differs from the equilibrium ensemble at the same T* and rho*, and they should clarify whether the thermostat is active during production runs.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (9) and simulation parameters] The time mapping appears inconsistent: one million steps with a reduced timestep of 0.01 corresponds to 10^4 reduced time units, which with tau = 4.1e-10 s gives approximately 4 microseconds, not the stated 'approximately 1 microsecond.' Please check the conversion and state the physical time consistently.
  2. [Abstract and Introduction] There are several language issues, including 'This phenomena' (should be 'This phenomenon'), the inconsistent hyphenation of 'non-equilibrium'/'nonequilibrium', and the phrase 'interacting with each other via several central potential' (should be 'several central potentials').
  3. [Figure 3 caption] The word 'non-equlibrium' in the caption is a typo for 'non-equilibrium.'
  4. [Fig. 2 and phase-diagram text] The equilibrium phase diagram is shown for the plain Lennard-Jones potential and the double-well potential with a=2.2 only; the five-times-Lennard-Jones case is not shown, so the statement that the chosen operating point lies inside the coexistence region for all studied B-B potentials is not fully supported by the figure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the arrested-coarsening observation is read directly from controlled MD simulations, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction and no load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that Ostwald ripening is absent in the driven non-equilibrium simulations across several two-body potentials—is obtained directly from molecular dynamics trajectories. The simulation protocol is specified (27,000 particles, 70% A / 30% B, NVE with Langevin thermostat, 1 million steps, reduced time step 0.01), and the comparison between the equilibrium (no-swap) and non-equilibrium (swap or momentum-kick) cases is a controlled contrast. No parameter is fitted to the droplet-size plateau and then relabeled as a prediction; the plateau is measured, not derived from an input. The potentials are chosen from the literature or standard Lennard-Jones variants, and the phase diagram location is verified with independent Monte Carlo simulations. The only possible concern is the interpretation of the finite one-microsecond plateau as a true arrested steady state rather than a slow transient; however, this is a question of simulation duration and statistical convergence, not circular reasoning. Self-citations in the references are incidental and not load-bearing: the paper does not rely on a prior 'uniqueness theorem' by the same authors, nor does it smuggle in its conclusion via a cited ansatz. Thus the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to circularity, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests primarily on hand-chosen interaction parameters (Gaussian H, delta, a; 5LJ factor) and a selected operating point (T*=1.25, rho*=0.05), plus the assertion that the swap and kick protocols generate true non-equilibrium steady states. No new physical entities are postulated. The parameter choices explicitly condition the appearance of the effect, which limits the universality of the 'in all cases' claim.

free parameters (6)
  • Gaussian strength H = -0.7
    Chosen so the Gaussian bump competes with the LJ minimum; without this the 'special results' do not occur.
  • Gaussian width delta = 0.2
    Width of the added Gaussian in the double-well potential; part of the hand-tuned parameter set.
  • Gaussian center a = 1.5, 2.2, 3.5
    Three tested positions of the Gaussian bump; values must create a second well or the effect disappears.
  • B-B potential multiplier = 5 x V_AA
    Hand-chosen strength for the single-well variant V_BB = 5 V_AA.
  • Reduced temperature T* = 1.25
    Selected so the point lies outside A coexistence and inside B coexistence; part of the chosen operating point.
  • Reduced density rho* = 0.05
    Selected to be dilute; the paper says the system must be dilute to avoid very rapid ripening.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Pairwise-additive two-body central potentials capture the physics of biological condensates.
    The model represents proteins and RNA only through central pair potentials (LJ, LJ+Gaussian, 5LJ), ignoring multibody effects, hydrodynamics, and sequence-specific interactions. Invoked throughout The Models.
  • ad hoc to paper The random A-B identity swaps at equal rates constitute a genuine non-equilibrium drive.
    The paper asserts the swaps 'violate local energy conservation and keep the system out of local equilibrium.' If the swap process actually satisfied detailed balance with respect to the Hamiltonian, the steady state would be equilibrium and the interpretation of the arrest would change.
  • domain assumption The Langevin thermostat equilibrates the system to T* without erasing the non-equilibrium drive.
    NVE simulations use a Langevin thermostat to reach steady state; the paper claims it does not introduce significant heat exchange, a standard but unverified simulation assumption.
  • standard math The DL_MONTE Monte Carlo coexistence boundaries in Fig. 2 are accurate.
    The operating point is justified as inside the B coexistence region based on MC simulations; the paper provides no convergence or error analysis for these boundaries.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Arrested Ostwald Ripening in Non-Equilibrium Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UGOYT3VR

@misc{pith2026250723580,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Arrested Ostwald Ripening in Non-Equilibrium Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UGOYT3VR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.23580}
}
read the original abstract

Absence of Ostwald ripening has been observed in living cells, which operate out of equilibrium. Using molecular dynamics we study the behaviour of liquid droplets away from equilibrium in a system of particles interacting with each other via several central potential. The system is driven out of equilibrium either by the particles randomly transitioning between two states, or by randomly changing their momenta. In all cases Ostwald ripening is absent only away from equilibrium. This phenomena, might be the mechanism by which droplets in living cells are stabilized.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.23580 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Potentials used in the simulation. Black: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Equilibrium phase diagram obtained using Monte [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5. Plots showing the largest droplet size in the simula [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Same as Fig. 3, with the double-well potential re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Plots showing the largest droplet size in the simula [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Largest droplet size as a function of time, with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Same as Fig. 3, with the non-equilibrium case rep [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. P. Brangwynne, C. R. Eckmann, D. S. Courson, A. Rybarska, C. Hoege, J. Gharakhani, F. J¨ ulicher, and A. A. Hyman, Germline p granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation, Sci- ence324, 1729 (2009)

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Shin and C

    Y. Shin and C. P. Brangwynne, Liquid phase conden- sation in cellphysiology and disease, Science357, 1242 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    B. V. Treeck and R. Parker, Principles of stress granules revealed by imaging approaches, Cold Spring Harbor Per- spectives in Biology11, a033068 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    D. C. Carrettiero, M. C. Almeida, A. P. Longhini, J. N. Rauch, D. Han, X. Zhang, S. Najafi, J. E. Gestwicki, and K. S. Kosik, Stress routes clients to the proteasome via a BAG2 ubiquitin-independent degradation condensate, Nature Communications13, 10.1038/s41467-022-30751- 4 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30751- 2022

  5. [5]

    I. A. Sawyer, D. Sturgill, M.-H. Sung, G. L. Hager, and M. Dundr, Cajal body function in genome organization and transcriptome diversity, BioEssays38, 1197 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    C. P. Brangwynne, T. J. Mitchison, and A. A. Hyman, Active liquid-like behavior of nucleoli determines their size and shape in xenopus laevis oocytes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108, 4334 (2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    A. A. Hyman, C. A. Weber, and F. J¨ ulicher, Liquid-liquid phase separation in biology, Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology30, 39 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Patel, L

    A. Patel, L. Malinovska, S. Saha, J. Wang, S. Alberti, Y. Krishnan, and A. A. Hyman, Atp as a biological hy- drotrope, Science356, 753 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Alberti, A

    S. Alberti, A. Gladfelter, and T. Mittag, Considerations and challenges in studying liquid–liquid phase separation and biomolecular condensates, Cell176, 419 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Zwicker, A

    D. Zwicker, A. A. Hyman, and F. J¨ ulicher, Suppression of ostwald ripening in active emulsions, Phys. Rev. E92, 012317 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    I. M. Lifshitz and V. V. Slyozov, The kinetics of pre- cipitation from supersaturated solid solutions, J. Phys. Chem. Solids19, 35 (1961)

    1961

  4. [12]

    N. D. Alikakos, G. Fusco, and G. Karali, Ostwald ripen- ing in two dimensions—the rigorous derivation of the equations from the mullins–sekerka dynamics, Journal of Differential Equations205, 1 (2004)

    2004

  5. [13]

    H. Xu, Y. Zhou, D. Daniel, J. Herzog, X. Wang, V. Sick, and S. Adera, Droplet attraction and coalescence mecha- nism on textured oil-impregnated surfaces, Nature Com- munications14, 10.1038/s41467-023-40279-w (2023)

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    J. Jin, C. Ooi, D. Dao, and N.-T. Nguyen, Coalescence processes of droplets and liquid marbles, Micromachines 8, 336 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    A. A. Hyman, C. A. Weber, and F. J¨ ulicher, Liquid-liquid phase separation in biology, Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology30, 39 (2014), pMID: 25288112, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013325

    2014 doi

  8. [16]

    Kolimi, A

    N. Kolimi, A. Pabbathi, N. Saikia, F. Ding, H. Sanabria, and J. Alper, Out-of-equilibrium biophysical chemistry: The case for multidimensional, integrated single-molecule approaches, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B125, 10404 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    A. M. Miangolarra, S. H.-J. Li, J.-F. Joanny, N. S. Wingreen, and M. Castellana, Steric interactions and out-of-equilibrium processes control the internal organi- zation of bacteria, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, 10.1073/pnas.2106014118 (2021)

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    Amano, M

    S. Amano, M. Esposito, E. Kreidt, D. A. Leigh, E. Penoc- chio, and B. M. W. Roberts, Using catalysis to drive chemistry away from equilibrium: Relating kinetic asym- metry, power strokes, and the curtin–hammett principle in brownian ratchets, Journal of the American Chemical S...

    2022

  11. [19]

    Belan and M

    S. Belan and M. Kardar, Active motion of passive asym- metric dumbbells in a non-equilibrium bath, The Journal of Chemical Physics154, 10.1063/5.0030623 (2021)

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    Ornes, How nonequilibrium thermodynamics speaks to the mystery of life, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, 423 (2017)

    S. Ornes, How nonequilibrium thermodynamics speaks to the mystery of life, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, 423 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Fodor, R

    ´E. Fodor, R. L. Jack, and M. E. Cates, Irreversibility and biased ensembles in active matter: Insights from stochas- tic thermodynamics, Annual Review of Condensed Mat- ter Physics13, 215 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    K. K. Nakashima, M. H. I. van Haren, A. A. M. Andr´ e, I. Robu, and E. Spruijt, Active coacervate droplets are protocells that grow and resist ostwald ripening, Na- ture Communications12, 10.1038/s41467-021-24111-x (2021)

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Berthin, J

    R. Berthin, J. Fries, M. Jardat, V. Dahirel, and P. Illien, Microscopic and stochastic simulations of chemically ac- tive droplets, https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14256 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    C. A. Weber, D. Zwicker, F. J¨ ulicher, and C. F. Lee, Physics of active emulsions, Reports on Progress in Physics82, 064601 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    C. B. Muratov, Theory of domain patterns in systems with long-range interactions of coulomb type, Phys. Rev. E66, 066108 (2002)

    2002

  18. [26]

    S. C. Glotzer, D. Stauffer, and N. Jan, Monte carlo simu- lations of phase separation in chemically reactive binary mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 4109 (1994)

    1994

  19. [27]

    J. J. Christensen, K. Elder, and H. C. Fogedby, Phase segregation dynamics of a chemically reactive binary mix- ture, Phys. Rev. E54, R2212 (1996)

    1996

  20. [28]

    Zwicker, A

    D. Zwicker, A. A. Hyman, and F. J¨ ulicher, Suppression of Ostwald ripening in active emulsions, Phys. Rev. E92, 012317 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    Zwicker, M

    D. Zwicker, M. Decker, S. Jaensch, A. A. Hy- man, and F. J¨ ulicher, Centrosomes are auto- catalytic droplets of pericentriolar material or- ganized by centrioles, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences111, E2636 (2014), https://www.pnas.org/content/111/26/E2636.full.pdf

    2014

  22. [30]

    Kirschbaum and D

    J. Kirschbaum and D. Zwicker, Controlling biomolecu- lar condensates via chemical reactions, J R Soc Interface 8 18(179):20210255, 20210255 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Tjhung, C

    E. Tjhung, C. Nardini, and M. E. Cates, Cluster phases and bubbly phase separation in active fluids: Reversal of the ostwald process, Phys. Rev. X8, 031080 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    G. S. Redner, M. F. Hagan, and A. Baskaran, Structure and dynamics of a phase-separating active colloidal fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 055701 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    Buttinoni, J

    I. Buttinoni, J. Bialk´ e, F. K¨ ummel, H. L¨ owen, C. Bechinger, and T. Speck, Dynamical clustering and phase separation in suspensions of self-propelled colloidal particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 238301 (2013)

    2013

  26. [34]

    Chattaraj and E

    A. Chattaraj and E. I. Shakhnovich, Biophysical Journal 124, 428 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    A. M. Tayar, M. F. Hagan, and Z. Dogic, Active liquid crystals powered by force-sensing DNA-motor clusters, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, 10.1073/pnas.2102873118 (2021)

    2021 doi

  28. [36]

    Singh and M

    R. Singh and M. Cates, Hydrodynamically interrupted droplet growth in scalar active matter, Physical Review Letters123, 10.1103/physrevlett.123.148005 (2019)

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    M. E. Cates, D. Marenduzzo, I. Pagonabarraga, and J. Tailleur, Arrested phase separation in reproducing bac- teria creates a generic route to pattern formation, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 11715 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    M. E. Cates, Arrest and flow of colloidal glasses, Annales Henri Poincar´ e4, 647 (2003)

    2003

  31. [39]

    Caballero and M

    F. Caballero and M. C. Marchetti, Activity-suppressed phase separation, Physical Review Letters129, 10.1103/physrevlett.129.268002 (2022)

    2022 doi

  32. [40]

    Osmanovi´ c and Y

    D. Osmanovi´ c and Y. Rabin, Chemically active nan- odroplets in a multi-component fluid, Soft Matter15, 5965 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    J. D. Wurtz and C. F. Lee, Chemical-reaction-controlled phase separated drops: Formation, size selection, and coarsening, Physical Review Letters120, 078102 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    M. S. Cheung, A. E. Garcia, and J. N. Onuchic, Protein folding mediated by solvation: Water expulsion and for- mation of the hydrophobic core occur after the structural collapse, PNAS99, 685 (2002)

    2002

  35. [43]

    Mishima and H

    O. Mishima and H. E. Stanley, The relationship between liquid, supercooled and glassy water, Nature396, 329 (1998)

    1998

  36. [44]

    Franzese, G

    G. Franzese, G. Malescio, A. Skibinsky, S. V. Buldyrev, and H. E. Stanley, Generic mechanism for generating a liquid–liquid phase transition, Nature409, 692 (2001)

    2001

  37. [45]

    K. A. Dill, K. Ghosh, and J. D. Schmit, Physi- cal limits of cells and proteomes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108, 17876 (2011), https://www.pnas.org/content/108/44/17876.full.pdf

    2011

  38. [46]

    A. V. Brukhno, J. Grant, T. L. Underwood, K. Stratford, S. C. Parker, J. A. Purton, and N. B. Wilding, DL - MONTE: A multipurpose code for Monte Carlo simula- tion (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolin- tineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton, LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based mat...

    2022

  40. [48]

    B. A. Huberman, Striations in chemical reactions, Jour- nal of Chemical Physics65, 2013 (1976)

    1976

  41. [49]

    Pi˜ nol, J

    R. Pi˜ nol, J. Zeler, C. D. S. Brites, Y. Gu, P. T´ ellez, A. N. C. Neto, T. E. da Silva, R. Moreno-Loshuertos, P. Fernandez-Silva, A. I. Gallego, L. Martinez-Lostao, A. Mart ´ ınez, L. D. Carlos, , and A. Mill´ an, Real-time in- tracellular temperature imaging using lanthanid...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.